22:
50:
588:
463:
the article in any way - i.e., it doesn't compromise its integrity or credibility - and I don't think it's that far-fetched to imagine that some people might find this useful or interesting. On that note, I'll leave it up to you to make the final inclusion decision! Oh, and maybe don't make lazy edit
433:
Well, to be honest, I mainly used the OR thing as an excuse to not write a long edit summary (I was really tired last night but didn't feel like going to bed). I totally agree with you. However, I removed it mainly because I don't think it should be there in the first place. I don't think the rate at
412:
in its correct context - "unpublished ideas or arguments, the core reason behind the NOR policy." I don't believe that simply observing the rate - a matter of quintessential objectivity - is an idea or argument. However, I'm not going to revert it, just thought I'd see what you thought of my opinion.
458:
cared about the information - in fact, several months back, there was a big talk page discussion on how to present the current storage, whether to present the rate, and how often to update the storage space. I am not one for trivia - lots of articles, especially regarding fictional characters or TV
240:
Thanks Pwnage8. ThroughTheDarkness, I'm not going to enter into any more debates about music-related articles, but I'd be happy to comment on something if you need it. Since I kind of started that debate in a way, I don't feel it's fair to say no, so feel free to ask me something if that's what you
403:
Hey there. Typically, I'm as much of a stickler as you on our core policies of NPOV, NOR, and V. However, the deletion you made from this article - the rate of increase - isn't unpublished synthesis, or even an unpublished idea. It's simply stating a continuance of what can be verified directly on
697:
Ah, never mind, it was me. It was really long ago, but I'm guessing I added the tag because, at that point, the article had very few third-party sources; the majority of them were from LimeWire's website. The article seems to have improved since then; feel free to remove the tag if you feel the
438:
to me. I think the sentence sounds just fine with the phrase, "continuously increasing free storage." I just think that it's not needed information, and no one really cares about the rate anyway. Thanks for not reverting it without explanation; I'm waiting to hear your feedback. —
114:
Because no one uses Gopher. Everyone uses Flash. But either way, my point was that there is no reason to mention one unsupported feature without listing them all, which would be stupid. The fact that it does not support the protocol doesn't make it notable; no
221:
Regrettably, FatalError has given up editing music articles, so I doubt he cares. But I'll let him answer the question, because I am also curious as to what's happening about that. I just thought this would be a good time to thank him for his contributions to
648:
page. Can you describe which sections you feel are poorly referenced? Is the page still poorly referenced or could you replace these with citation needed for individual statements you feel are contentious? Maybe this was archived in the
785:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
315:
And now they put it back in. Either way, it won't solve the problem; the genres will still be in the articles, just in the body instead of the infobox. That proposal won't do anthing to stop genre disputes. —
603:
355:
Excuse me, I did not see it covered and regardless of whether or not it is a reliable source, it works, i have used this precise method and am currently using it, I do not see how this is unreliable.
278:. It doesn't matter what the band says, and it certainly doesn't matter what you'd qualify their music as. Making your own judgement about whether their music is Christian or not is
241:
wanted. Just don't drag me back into that debate...I'd rather not. I feel it's a waste of time until
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies change. But it doesn't hurt to ask, does it? :) —
483:
Hah okay thanks for the advice. Well I guess you're right. I'll add it back in. I just thought it was redundant. But yeah, it wouldn't hurt the article, so you're right. —
404:
the gmail page. I note you didn't remove the actual amount of storage space, which is retrieved directly from the gmail page, also. This is probably a matter of applying
259:
alright thanks man i was just wondering if you believed if a band's beliefs were christian than should they list themselves as and sing christian music...
181:
That's irrelevant...the numbers come from the source. Please don't change them again unless you have a more updated source. In the meantime, check out
378:. Blogs posts cannot be used as sources. Just because it works doesn't mean we should mention it. And it's already mentioned under the section "
810:
167:
298:
454:
Hmm. Well, I disagree with you there; almost every article on Wiki has information that wouldn't be considered essential. Obviously
99:
is an unimportant feature? I think Flash and all those lousy screaming and singing web ads are much more unimportant than Gopher.
442:
385:
319:
285:
244:
188:
130:
806:
566:
Fair enough. But the article does not currently establish the subject's notability, so I still think it ought to be deleted. —
297:
I dunno if you know this, but they took out the genre field from all artist and album articles. There is an ongoing discussion
748:), but you are right—many people on the Ajax page will probably be looking for a list of frameworks. I've added it back in. —
63:
595:
264:
210:
797:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
599:
802:
341:
72:
745:
260:
206:
171:
459:
shows, have so much "trivia" that I think I'm reading IMDb. In this case, however, I don't think that this
673:
658:
556:
798:
548:
473:
422:
337:
163:
517:
774:
765:
611:
602:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
532:
794:
778:
435:
37:. Likewise, if I send you a message, I will watch your page so we don't have to go back and forth.
722:
360:
119:
have mentioned it. Just because it's true doesn't mean we have to include it in the article. See
104:
78:
536:
405:
274:
I believe we should go by the sources. If they call a band "Christian rock", then list them as
144:
730:
669:
654:
552:
306:
231:
223:
96:
790:
782:
120:
465:
414:
143:
thanks for the signature teach. I'm partecipating to Wiki, from 1 month only. thanks again--
74:
49:
21:
793:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
786:
749:
699:
683:
622:
567:
513:
484:
409:
375:
279:
116:
741:
607:
275:
148:
371:
182:
124:
551:, merging the two is akin to merging the articles on Internet Explorer and Firefox.--
379:
356:
336:
If it doesn't have a constant
Christian theme to it, it most likely ain't Christian.
100:
726:
302:
227:
587:
370:
What do you mean "regardless of whether or not it is a reliable source"? See
76:
226:, an article he created. It's looking so much better now. He is missed. --
650:
645:
638:
434:
which the space increases benefits the article in any way. It seems like
814:
758:
734:
708:
692:
677:
662:
631:
615:
576:
560:
521:
493:
478:
449:
427:
392:
364:
345:
326:
310:
292:
268:
251:
235:
214:
195:
175:
152:
137:
108:
781:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Knowledge (XXG)
544:
509:
508:
Saw your edits on Lastfm. If you have an account you should join the
164:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/
604:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Erlang (programming language)
668:
Err, maybe it is that the references are not secondary sources?
79:
43:
15:
586:
721:
Please take note I have included the link in "see also" in
217:
Hey man i was just wondering if you still on that issue?
34:
725:
to prevent the inclusion of many links to frameworks.
594:An article that you have been involved in editing,
773:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
644:You added a tag for additional references in the
531:I have removed the merge tag from the article on
91:How can you say Gopher is an unimportant feature?
740:I removed it because we already have a link to
583:AfD nomination of Erlang (programming language)
8:
744:, which is close enough (and also links to
183:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies on verifiability
543:shell-extension, whereas PhpGmailDrive is
682:It wasn't me that added the tag... —
7:
547:. As pointed out by another user on
202:Hey about the Christian genre thing
33:If you send me a message, consider
162:I would say that the nightlies at
14:
799:review the candidates' statements
48:
20:
805:. For the Election committee,
775:Arbitration Committee election
766:ArbCom elections are now open!
196:04:20, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
176:01:44, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
153:23:50, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
815:13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
759:09:30, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
735:09:04, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
709:04:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
693:21:53, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
596:Erlang (programming language)
522:03:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
138:18:46, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
109:09:11, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
678:23:49, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
663:22:52, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
632:03:54, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
616:04:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
577:04:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
561:19:31, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
494:02:47, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
479:02:31, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
450:02:13, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
428:06:38, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
380:unofficial Chromium releases
327:05:09, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
311:23:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
30:I reply on my own talk page.
801:and submit your choices on
393:00:27, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
365:00:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
293:23:27, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
269:22:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
252:23:25, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
236:22:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
215:21:44, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
830:
807:MediaWiki message delivery
166:are "preview releases". --
346:22:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
282:. That's my two cents. —
698:sources are fine now. —
158:Firefox preview releases
746:List of Ajax frameworks
717:List of Ajax Frameworks
598:, has been listed for
591:
464:summaries anymore ;-)
779:Arbitration Committee
590:
653:talk pages. Thanks,
783:arbitration process
795:arbitration policy
723:Ajax (programming)
592:
549:Talk:PhpGmailDrive
351:google chrome edit
207:ThroughTheDarkness
35:watching this page
756:
706:
690:
629:
574:
491:
447:
390:
324:
290:
280:original research
249:
224:A Day to Remember
193:
135:
85:
84:
42:
41:
821:
755:
752:
705:
702:
689:
686:
628:
625:
573:
570:
490:
487:
476:
470:
446:
443:
425:
419:
389:
386:
338:Carak the zombie
323:
320:
289:
286:
248:
245:
192:
189:
134:
131:
117:reliable sources
95:How can you say
80:
52:
44:
24:
16:
829:
828:
824:
823:
822:
820:
819:
818:
803:the voting page
769:
753:
719:
703:
687:
642:
626:
606:. Thank you.
585:
571:
529:
510:wikipedia group
506:
488:
474:
466:
444:
423:
415:
401:
387:
353:
321:
287:
246:
204:
190:
160:
132:
93:
81:
75:
57:
38:
25:
12:
11:
5:
827:
825:
772:
768:
763:
762:
761:
742:Ajax framework
718:
715:
714:
713:
712:
711:
695:
641:
636:
635:
634:
584:
581:
580:
579:
528:
525:
505:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
400:
397:
396:
395:
352:
349:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
276:Christian rock
257:
256:
255:
254:
203:
200:
199:
198:
159:
156:
141:
140:
92:
89:
87:
83:
82:
77:
73:
71:
68:
67:
59:
58:
53:
47:
40:
39:
32:
28:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
826:
817:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
792:
788:
784:
780:
776:
767:
764:
760:
757:
750:
747:
743:
739:
738:
737:
736:
732:
728:
724:
716:
710:
707:
700:
696:
694:
691:
684:
681:
680:
679:
675:
671:
667:
666:
665:
664:
660:
656:
652:
647:
640:
637:
633:
630:
623:
620:
619:
618:
617:
613:
609:
605:
601:
597:
589:
582:
578:
575:
568:
565:
564:
563:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
533:PhpGmailDrive
527:PhpGmailDrive
526:
524:
523:
519:
515:
511:
503:
495:
492:
485:
482:
481:
480:
477:
471:
469:
462:
457:
453:
452:
451:
448:
441:
437:
432:
431:
430:
429:
426:
420:
418:
411:
408:, and taking
407:
398:
394:
391:
384:
381:
377:
373:
369:
368:
367:
366:
362:
358:
350:
348:
347:
343:
339:
328:
325:
318:
314:
313:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
295:
294:
291:
284:
281:
277:
273:
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
253:
250:
243:
239:
238:
237:
233:
229:
225:
220:
219:
218:
216:
212:
208:
201:
197:
194:
187:
184:
180:
179:
178:
177:
173:
169:
168:85.90.148.140
165:
157:
155:
154:
150:
146:
139:
136:
129:
126:
122:
118:
113:
112:
111:
110:
106:
102:
98:
90:
88:
70:
69:
66:
65:
61:
60:
56:
51:
46:
45:
36:
31:
27:
23:
18:
17:
770:
751:
720:
701:
685:
670:Bpringlemeir
655:Bpringlemeir
643:
624:
593:
569:
553:Innerproduct
541:windows only
540:
530:
507:
486:
467:
460:
455:
440:
416:
402:
383:
354:
335:
317:
283:
261:KillTheEnemy
258:
242:
205:
186:
161:
142:
128:
94:
86:
62:
54:
29:
413:Take care.
791:topic bans
621:...why? —
537:GmailDrive
514:Cassius 52
787:site bans
608:Fikusfail
651:LimeWire
646:LimeWire
639:LimeWire
600:deletion
406:WP:SENSE
399:Gmail OR
357:Petiatil
101:Urvabara
55:Archives
727:Macaldo
545:GmailFS
456:someone
303:Pwnage8
228:Pwnage8
121:WP:NOTE
777:. The
504:Lastfm
436:trivia
97:Gopher
754:Error
704:Error
688:Error
627:Error
572:Error
539:is a
489:Error
461:hurts
445:Error
410:WP:OR
388:Error
382:". —
376:WP:RS
322:Error
288:Error
247:Error
191:Error
133:Error
811:talk
731:talk
674:talk
659:talk
612:talk
557:talk
518:talk
374:and
372:WP:V
361:talk
342:talk
307:talk
301:. --
299:here
265:talk
232:talk
211:talk
185:. —
172:talk
149:talk
145:Efa2
127:. —
125:WP:V
123:and
105:talk
771:Hi,
472:|
468:Tan
421:|
417:Tan
813:)
789:,
733:)
676:)
661:)
614:)
559:)
535:.
520:)
512:--
475:39
424:39
363:)
344:)
309:)
267:)
234:)
213:)
174:)
151:)
107:)
809:(
729:(
672:(
657:(
610:(
555:(
516:(
359:(
340:(
305:(
263:(
230:(
209:(
170:(
147:(
103:(
64:1
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
