211:
24:
I may have asked this question a year or two back, but I don't think it was answered. Is a published autobiography (by an respected academic press) considered as an acceptable source for a
Knowledge (XXG) biography, or not? Is there any explicit Knowledge (XXG) documentation addressing this? Is there
161:
I am a
Cannabis proponent, so my edits would be very POV. I'd want to put in something like "more rare than being struck in the ass by a meteorite." I was shocked to find that there were four; I'd only ever heard of one death in 2018. Hence, you are a far better person to correct the article than I.
137:
means; four is the sum of what's reported in the two existing citations. It is certainly possible/likely that more deaths have occurred since, but I didn't want the reader to think the number was in the hundreds or thousands.CHS is a nasty symptom that I'd never heard of till 2 days ago! (and I've
67:
Agreed re: the above replies, though my guess is that whether it would need an in-text attribution depends on the nature of the claim it's used as a citation for. If you search the archives using "autobiography" as the search term, it looks like there have been several relevant discussions. Some
110:
First, SUPERB updates to the
Cannabis article. Your work is appreciated. The last sentence regarding number of CHS deaths would appear, in context, to mean that four people in the group defined as "one Colorado medical center following legalization". Is there a way to make it clear that it is 4
338:
If you review the user's talk page, AGF is the only thing that prevents the application of the label, troll. I am sure they mean well, bless their heart. I think it is best for you to continue editing
Cannabis in good faith as you have been doing and let the community support you.
184:
This Alex person sounds like they need a large dose of the product in question. Every source I can find for differentiating between inhalation and oral consumption would equally miss the bar s/he has set for BMI.
312:. Also, please check sources before calling them "junk" ; the cited source was a solid reference (even if you personally dislike the book and publisher). (That said, I have now learned that the stricter
68:
identify other autobiographies of this sort, such as Barack Obama's and Burt
Reynold's, so you could also take a look at their pages to see how those autobiographies are used as sources. --
308:: "An edit war only arises if the situation develops into a series of back-and-forth reverts....not every revert or controversial edit is regarded as edit warrings". See also
265:
133:
Good suggestion, I did a preliminary change. BTW, what does POV mean here? Not Point of View, I think. Pissed-Off something? I'm not sure what your
384:
222:. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
431:
article (another odd time signature), would you be willing to look through the article as it stands and let me know if you have any critiques?
423:
Hi Finney1234. I've recently started an article here related to time signatures such as 11/4 and 11/8, and I've linked to the article in the
256:
to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
139:
261:
227:
381:
271:
317:
436:
257:
215:
424:
395:
373:
73:
301:
55:
94:
321:
309:
231:
223:
432:
234:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
69:
45:
313:
344:
287:
190:
167:
120:
91:
403:
I'm not quite sure what type of formatting you're referring to; could you clarify? Thanks.
305:
278:
428:
404:
365:
325:
253:
219:
148:
26:
87:
41:
21:(Copy a discussion from "Biographies of Living Persons" so I can access it easily).
340:
297:
283:
186:
163:
130:
116:
304:
revert is not an "edit war"; this posting on my talk page was inappropriate. See
147:
Thanks for the appreciation, most of my
Knowledge (XXG) changes get ignored :-)
59:
440:
427:
template box. Seeing as you have contributed quite substantially to the
412:
388:
348:
333:
291:
242:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
194:
171:
156:
124:
97:
90:
article is cited 95% to his autobiography, and that was promoted to GA.
77:
62:
49:
34:
320:
can be argued to apply here. Although I'm not sure I agree, I accept
371:-like tags to format your proposals or replies nicely. Regards.
252:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
25:
any noteworthy prior discussion on this topic? Thanks.
247:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
281:, especially before edit-warring in junk sources.
115:without sounding as POV as I would make it sound?
8:
40:It would probably need in-text attribution.
264:. In some cases, it may be appropriate to
218:according to the reverts you have made on
214:You currently appear to be engaged in an
162:And an excellent editor overall. Cheers,
54:At a minimum it would be usable as per
7:
268:. If you engage in an edit war, you
17:Published autobiographies as sources
316:guideline rather than the standard
14:
266:request temporary page protection
209:
140:Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome
226:with others, to avoid editing
1:
172:20:55, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
157:02:25, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
125:23:38, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
413:11:37, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
389:10:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
349:23:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
334:15:22, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
292:21:36, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
195:21:18, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
98:09:54, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
78:23:37, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
63:23:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
50:23:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
35:18:11, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
456:
441:04:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
138:done a lot of cleanup on
408:
329:
232:try to reach a consensus
152:
419:Undecuple Meter Article
258:appropriate noticeboard
262:dispute resolution
447:
401:
398:
387:
379:
376:
370:
364:
318:WP:Verifiability
237:Points to note:
213:
212:
106:Cannabis Changes
455:
454:
450:
449:
448:
446:
445:
444:
433:Toothlesswalrus
429:quintuple meter
421:
399:
396:
377:
374:
372:
368:
362:
359:
220:Cannabis (drug)
210:
207:
108:
19:
12:
11:
5:
453:
451:
425:Musical meters
420:
417:
416:
415:
358:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
250:
249:
244:
206:
203:
202:
201:
200:
199:
198:
197:
177:
176:
175:
174:
144:
143:
107:
104:
103:
102:
101:
100:
88:Colin Grainger
81:
80:
65:
52:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
452:
443:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
393:
392:
391:
390:
386:
383:
380:
367:
356:
350:
346:
342:
337:
336:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
302:WP:Good faith
299:
296:
295:
294:
293:
289:
285:
282:
280:
275:
274:from editing.
273:
267:
263:
259:
255:
248:
245:
243:
240:
239:
238:
235:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
205:December 2021
204:
196:
192:
188:
183:
182:
181:
180:
179:
178:
173:
169:
165:
160:
159:
158:
154:
150:
146:
145:
141:
136:
132:
129:
128:
127:
126:
122:
118:
114:
105:
99:
96:
93:
89:
85:
84:
83:
82:
79:
75:
71:
70:FactOrOpinion
66:
64:
61:
57:
56:WP:BLPSELFPUB
53:
51:
47:
43:
39:
38:
37:
36:
32:
28:
22:
16:
422:
361:You can use
360:
322:WP:Consensus
310:WP:Reverting
298:User:Alexbrn
276:
269:
251:
246:
241:
236:
228:disruptively
208:
134:
112:
109:
30:
23:
20:
224:collaborate
405:Finney1234
326:Finney1234
277:Maybe try
149:Finney1234
27:Finney1234
300:A single
254:talk page
230:, and to
357:Use tags
314:WP:MEDRS
260:or seek
216:edit war
42:Blueboar
341:Last1in
284:Alexbrn
272:blocked
270:may be
187:Last1in
164:Last1in
131:Last1in
117:Last1in
111:people
95:Snowman
382:(talk)
366:divbox
306:WP:WAR
279:WP:BRD
92:Giant
60:Ryk72
437:talk
409:talk
345:talk
330:talk
288:talk
191:talk
168:talk
153:talk
135:ever
121:talk
113:ever
86:The
74:talk
58:. -
46:talk
31:talk
400:NOV
397:AXO
394:Hi
378:NOV
375:AXO
324:).
439:)
411:)
369:}}
363:{{
347:)
332:)
290:)
193:)
170:)
155:)
142:).
123:)
76:)
48:)
33:)
435:(
407:(
385:⚑
343:(
328:(
286:(
189:(
166:(
151:(
119:(
72:(
44:(
29:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.