27:
53:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
57:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
39:
50:
43:
78:. You need relaible sources (not blogs etc) about the service from places other than the website itself.
83:
75:
71:
59:
87:
62:
79:
34:
18:
70:
In answer to your question on the article deletion page please read
32:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
38:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge according to
8:
51:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Geokrety
7:
40:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
14:
49:The article will be discussed at
25:
1:
88:18:49, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
63:18:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
106:
42:or whether it should be
97:
29:
28:
105:
104:
100:
99:
98:
96:
95:
94:
30:
26:
23:
12:
11:
5:
103:
101:
93:
92:
91:
90:
24:
22:
17:Nomination of
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
102:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
67:
66:
65:
64:
61:
55:
52:
47:
45:
41:
37:
36:
20:
16:
56:
48:
33:
31:
21:for deletion
60:ItsZippy
35:Geokrety
19:Geokrety
44:deleted
76:WP:WEB
72:WP:ORG
80:NtheP
84:talk
74:and
86:)
46:.
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.