592:
do present it. I have come back with this account in an attempt to continue editing in my preferred topics, but have made sure to adhere strictly to guidelines. Everyone has their preferred subject matter, why would it be expected that they no longer edit articles relevant to that subject matter if they are adhering to policy? This will be my last unblock request, but please take the time to review my many constructive contributions to the encyclopedia before declining, and please point out to me any diffs where I made any questionable actions. See
707:, and is attempting to achieve better results by asking a more narrowly-focused, policy-based question of the community. Assumptions based on the previous RFC should be discarded before participation, particularly the assumption that Knowledge (XXG) has or inherently needs to have articles covering generalized perspective on each side of abortion advocacy, and that what we are trying to do is come up with labels for that. Thanks! —chaos5023 20:28, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
84:
506:
309:
760:
719:
177:
lot of work, and perhaps I can come back when I have better ideas for its improvement. On retrospect my comment about an image of the dog into the article may have been a bit misguided. It doesn't seem appropriate or encyclopedic. Perhaps on an article about
Columbo characters, but not the main article. —
591:
Per original reason above, and to add/respond to the declining admin: I was not "editing in the same way that got me into the conflict in the first place", I participated in no edit wars and violated no policies or guidelines with my edits through this account. If there is evidence that I did, please
150:
Fox, far be it from me to lecture anybody about their own talk pages. However, I have to ask: why did you delete my posts? You do have the right to delete it all - but you also have the right to ask an editor not to post to your page. You could have done that. In any case I get the hint and I won't
176:
with the rest of the archive. Sorry if you got the idea that I was being rude or did not want to discuss with you, that is not the case at all. Rather, I feel that I'd rather pull out of the
Columbo-related discussion for the time being before getting too involved. I agree that the article needs a
394:
Jayjg has been stalking me and upon banning me (he also banned my previous account), has also reverted all my (completely legitimate) edits, knowing full well that I can't dispute the reversions. I believe he is clearly doing this to promote his own POV in these matters and continue his personal
284:
at AN/I you neglected to inform the user concerned. As you may have seem I have subsequently blocked him/her but the editor is reasonably cross that s/he wasn't informed of the AN/I discussion that ultimately led to the block! Please be careful to follow the instructions at AN/I about informing
474:
Additional note: It appears that User:Jajyg's own personal views conflict directly with the use of BC/AD (he is Jewish), so I think that makes it very obvious that he is inappropriately pursuing his personal vendetta to push his OWN POV on these matters by reverting my legitimate edits. —
260:
Thank YOU for your contributions to wikipedia! Given your response on
Byzantine Empire talk and on my talk page, I clearly wasn't being very articulate. Nothing arbitrary intended. Thanks for letting me know, I've explained myself more fully on the topic talk
399:
after the block of the User:CIS account, and if you review my contributions you will see that there is not ONE POLICY that I have ever violated. If I have, I will gladly accept the permaban. I greatly appreciate administrator intervention on this issue. —
214:
434:
You were blocked repeatedly for abusing multiple accounts. The strategy of coming back with yet another account and editing in the same way that got you into conflict in the first place is, shall we say, poorly advised.
696:
775:
734:
692:
600:(there are others, check his contribs) of Jayjg seemingly abusing his admin privileges to advance his own POV. He reverted a perfectly legitimate edit that was in accordance with
131:
Hi. Just want to tell you that if I deleted comments, it was unintentional, and must have been an error I made when editing. I absolutely never delete talk page comments.
675:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
464:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
71:
to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
660:
449:
132:
753:
712:
546:
349:
593:
395:
vendetta against me, and at the very least I would like another administrator to look at this issue, not him. I have tried to
34:, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And
519:
322:
620:
541:
491:
416:
344:
240:
193:
159:
513:
316:
518:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
321:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
173:
136:
101:
111:
19:
295:
767:
37:
233:
152:
726:
48:
700:
51:
unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—
704:
684:
638:
789:
560:
363:
290:
286:
266:
117:
68:
396:
669:
646:
458:
113:
83:
601:
779:
641:. You, the person, are forbidden from editing Knowledge (XXG) with any account or IP.
262:
151:
post here again. If you prefer it, I won't even directly address you again, anywhere.—
436:
31:
596:
for an example of my positive contributions to the encyclopedia. Also, please see
55:—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if
642:
213:
738:
606:
524:
477:
402:
327:
179:
759:
718:
697:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage
229:
115:
793:
746:
699:, which is now in its community feedback phase. Please note that
650:
625:
496:
439:
421:
297:
270:
247:
198:
166:
140:
118:
77:
766:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
725:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
758:
717:
693:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Abortion article titles
504:
307:
695:, you may wish to register an opinion on its followup RFC,
232:. Your post also was read and understood--what a relief. —
657:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
446:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
677:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
466:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
597:
574:
570:
564:
555:
551:
537:
533:
529:
377:
373:
367:
358:
354:
340:
336:
332:
281:
285:
users, and it would be a nice gesture if you'd go to
512:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
315:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
26:
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the
172:I haven't deleted the posts, I moved them over to
8:
774:redirect, you might want to participate in
733:redirect, you might want to participate in
770:. Since you had some involvement with the
729:. Since you had some involvement with the
211:
7:
752:"Lists of Google Doodles" listed at
737:if you have not already done so. --
276:Notifying users about AN/I reports
14:
40:with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
289:and apologise for the omission.
212:
82:
687:now in community feedback phase
711:Happy Holidays 2011 listed at
1:
794:18:52, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
747:04:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
691:Hello. As a participant in
516:, who declined the request.
319:, who declined the request.
67:. Remember, we can use our
809:
703:is not simply a repeat of
248:18:49, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
199:20:50, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
167:19:25, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
141:12:59, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
661:guide to appealing blocks
450:guide to appealing blocks
298:17:20, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
271:21:14, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
218:
174:User talk:FoxCE/Archive 1
754:Redirects for discussion
713:Redirects for discussion
651:06:57, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
626:04:47, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
497:03:10, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
440:04:40, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
422:03:04, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
280:Hi there, when you made
778:if you wish to do so.
776:the redirect discussion
772:Lists of Google Doodles
768:Lists of Google Doodles
735:the redirect discussion
63:, please respond to it
763:
722:
509:
312:
228:For your fine work at
762:
721:
561:change block settings
508:
364:change block settings
311:
287:Bloodofox's talk page
222:The Editor's Barnstar
731:Happy Holidays 2011
727:Happy Holidays 2011
59:leave a comment on
764:
723:
510:
397:make a clean start
313:
38:sign your messages
624:
495:
420:
256:No, no, thank you
253:
252:
197:
127:Deleting comments
124:
123:
47:I prefer to keep
800:
786:
744:
683:Followup RFC to
674:
668:
614:
611:
610:
580:
578:
567:
549:
547:deleted contribs
507:
485:
482:
481:
463:
457:
410:
407:
406:
383:
381:
370:
352:
350:deleted contribs
310:
293:
245:
238:
216:
209:
208:
205:It is a pleasure
187:
184:
183:
164:
157:
119:
86:
78:
36:don't forget to
22:to my talk page!
808:
807:
803:
802:
801:
799:
798:
797:
780:
757:
739:
716:
689:
680:
672:
666:
665:, then use the
654:
629:
608:
607:
568:
558:
544:
527:
520:blocking policy
505:
479:
478:
469:
461:
455:
454:, then use the
443:
425:
404:
403:
371:
361:
347:
330:
323:blocking policy
308:
305:
291:
278:
258:
241:
234:
207:
181:
180:
160:
153:
148:
133:207.237.211.236
129:
120:
114:
105:
91:
76:
24:
12:
11:
5:
806:
804:
756:
750:
715:
709:
688:
681:
655:
636:
632:Decline reason
589:
585:Request reason
582:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
444:
432:
428:Decline reason
392:
388:Request reason
385:
306:
304:
301:
292:Kim Dent-Brown
277:
274:
257:
254:
251:
250:
225:
224:
219:
217:
206:
203:
202:
201:
147:
144:
128:
125:
122:
121:
116:
112:
110:
107:
106:
100:
97:
96:
93:
92:
87:
81:
61:your talk page
16:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
805:
796:
795:
791:
787:
785:
784:
777:
773:
769:
761:
755:
751:
749:
748:
745:
742:
736:
732:
728:
720:
714:
710:
708:
706:
702:
698:
694:
686:
682:
679:
678:
671:
664:
662:
653:
652:
648:
644:
640:
635:
633:
628:
627:
622:
618:
613:
612:
603:
599:
595:
588:
586:
581:
576:
572:
566:
562:
557:
553:
548:
543:
539:
538:global blocks
535:
534:active blocks
531:
526:
521:
517:
515:
514:administrator
498:
493:
489:
484:
483:
473:
472:
471:
470:
468:
467:
460:
453:
451:
442:
441:
438:
431:
429:
424:
423:
418:
414:
409:
408:
398:
391:
389:
384:
379:
375:
369:
365:
360:
356:
351:
346:
342:
341:global blocks
338:
337:active blocks
334:
329:
324:
320:
318:
317:administrator
302:
300:
299:
296:
294:
288:
283:
275:
273:
272:
268:
264:
255:
249:
246:
244:
239:
237:
231:
227:
226:
223:
220:
215:
210:
204:
200:
195:
191:
186:
185:
175:
171:
170:
169:
168:
165:
163:
158:
156:
145:
143:
142:
138:
134:
126:
109:
108:
103:
99:
98:
95:
94:
90:
85:
80:
79:
75:
72:
70:
66:
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
42:
41:
39:
33:
29:
23:
21:
782:
781:
771:
765:
740:
730:
724:
690:
676:
658:
656:
637:
631:
630:
616:
605:
598:this example
594:this article
590:
584:
583:
556:creation log
523:
511:
487:
476:
465:
447:
445:
433:
427:
426:
412:
401:
393:
387:
386:
359:creation log
326:
314:
279:
259:
242:
235:
221:
189:
178:
161:
154:
149:
130:
104:(2011–2012)
88:
73:
64:
60:
56:
53:my talk page
52:
44:
43:
35:
27:
25:
17:
701:WP:RFC/AAMC
643:Max Semenik
282:this report
74:Thank you!
49:discussions
30:, as a new
705:WP:RFC/AAT
685:WP:RFC/AAT
639:WP:NOTTHEM
552:filter log
355:filter log
45:Attention:
783:Steel1943
659:read the
571:checkuser
530:block log
448:read the
374:checkuser
333:block log
263:TheCormac
243:imacowboy
162:imacowboy
102:Archive 1
69:watchlist
621:contribs
542:contribs
492:contribs
437:jpgordon
417:contribs
345:contribs
236:Djathink
194:contribs
155:Djathink
89:Archives
670:unblock
565:unblock
459:unblock
368:unblock
303:Unblock
230:Columbo
32:section
20:welcome
18:Hello,
602:WP:ERA
28:bottom
663:first
609:FoxCE
525:FoxCE
480:FoxCE
452:first
405:FoxCE
328:FoxCE
261:page.
182:FoxCE
146:Query
65:there
790:talk
743:avix
647:talk
617:talk
604:. —
488:talk
413:talk
267:talk
190:talk
137:talk
575:log
522:).
378:log
325:).
792:)
673:}}
667:{{
649:)
634::
619:•
587::
569:•
563:•
559:•
554:•
550:•
545:•
540:•
536:•
532:•
490:•
462:}}
456:{{
435:--
430::
415:•
390::
372:•
366:•
362:•
357:•
353:•
348:•
343:•
339:•
335:•
269:)
192:•
139:)
788:(
741:T
645:(
623:)
615:(
579:)
577:)
573:(
528:(
494:)
486:(
419:)
411:(
382:)
380:)
376:(
331:(
265:(
196:)
188:(
135:(
57:I
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
