401:
subs tossed around in Guam is worthy of mentioning in the article. If you'll notice, I've only removed specific events like that, which are not relevant. The other stuff I've removed are the mentions to excessively specific detail (e.g. that table listing out tiny islands that had no damage, just warnings/evacuations), while leaving things like the coastal warning for the West Coast. I've brought up MANY topics on the talk page if I thought they might be controversial. Not to mention other topics there, just in the spirit of community editing. If you look at my own talk page, you'll note that I've resolved disputes and so forth in a pretty reasonable fashion, not by calling people offensive...
568:
that you might consider toning down how you describe your edits some. Taking such an aggressive stance (including using head-bashing all caps) tends to either incite the affected edtior into an edit war, or if they are new not to continue editing. Consider a more neutral approach (which I learned to adopt through the above trial and error). For example, the description I had used to the same content excision as you was simply "Sufficient detail", describing the entry in its truncated fashion. Ideally that gives an explanation for the edit without being overly contentious.
787:
saw that you did edit the talk page and that it was an admin decision to make the move, you'll notice I undid my change and went back to the name you moved it to. So please don't construe this as me not "letting it go", I simply didn't realize it was an admin decision on the move discussion as the talk page hadn't been updated yet, and once I did realize it I heeded that and even went and changed the name references within the page to conform to the new name. –
1138:
973:
629:
320:
26:
669:
510:
927:
737:
commitments to provide manpower and relief aids, that's INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE. Therefore that Reuter's article of Japan's initial response, of which you're obviously a huge fan of, DOES NOT FIT in the "International response" section of the article. Please understand and release you stranglehold on this
Knowledge (XXG) article.
761:, you need to let it go (as adviced by 66.214.170.230) and trust it to the Admins to handle it. Note that this is beginning to look badly on your part if you carry on with such potentially controversial moves in future, the Admins are there for a reason, you know? Also, might you be interested to read up on
786:
The reason I undid your move was because you hadn't made your edit to the earthquake page's talk page yet, thus I did not check your user info to notice you were an admin. So, I thought I was continuing the consensus of the same people who reverted ME earlier, by performing the same reversion. Once I
412:
Oh, and btw, I can't really add more detail about the
Japanese side of things than your average editor...because I'm an American, don't speak Japanese, have lived in the US my entire life, and have no ties to Japan! (Well, I did once visit Tokyo for a week, but I've visited a lot of places.) Though I
408:
as well. The fact is, most of the non-Japanese language news has been reporting on these minor things, but in the long run things like a misc non-notable city having had storm surges is NOT going to be relevant to this article. (Sorry, but
Brookings, OR, which appears to have about 6000 people and is
349:
Your campaign to remove any mention of the effects of this event outside of Japan is offensive and POV. If you desire more detail added on the effects inside Japan, please add it. The article is sorely missing it and I complained about it on the talk page many hours ago to no avail. But do not remove
1203:
The problem is the poorly documented, poorly written article on
Earthquake Prediction. It lacks references, contains errors, and is generally slanted toward uninformed, sensationalist news articles as sources. Forgive me for saying this, but at the moment this article is not a feather in the cap of
586:
Saw your positive response at my Talk page. Understand your frustration. Nothing is more so than editing either the daily feature article or one on breaking news. One really does get to the point of wanting to crack others on the head. Resisting asks alot. When there is blowback or a tug of war when
567:
I was trying to make the very same edit you were to a recent addition of flight specific detail on
Chinese aid being announced. Yours beat mine by seconds. When I saw it was the same change I was gratified, but reading your description of it (and others below on the History page) it occurred to me
400:
Hi, can you please point out what edits are so offensive specifically? I am not on a campaign to remove any mention of non-Japanese events in this disaster; however, one of my goals HAS been to remove non-NPOV material, a lot of which seems to be added by folks who think that things like a couple of
847:
Sorry, obviously I accidentally connected your comment on my talk page with my accidental reversion of the admin page move. As to your comment on my own move earlier, I really just didn't understand the page move process well, and will try to be more cautious of other folks' views of what should be
1215:
How should I proceed? Is it possible to form a little group to get this embarrassment for
Knowledge (XXG) straightened out? Please understand, I am seeking guidance for how tactically to proceed and how to formulate facts inoffensively. I do not need help with the science itself (if you need more
492:
I second that (= the above!)! Flodded, you are a great asset in the current
Japanese E&T article! I also <3 your snowman-figure! Diversity at its best! Well, take your involvement with the Sendai E&T and your snowman-figure, and you get the thing that follows right down below, something
365:
Absolutely. I should have just added my facts back. I didn't read carefully enough to see that the one death off the Oregon coast was already there--and done better than I did it--but unless there are other articles about the tsunami that include what happened in the United States, then I think we
1163:
I think you intended to revert
Zdavatz, not me. I just moved a sentence about ports within a paragraph. Each edit is taking me 3 or 4 attempts with new error messages I have never seen before (Too many people are reading this article! Cache failure.) So I haven't been able to fix this. Took me 10
1002:
I'm sorry that you see it that way but i'm not being personal in any way. I just think that you're removing information for it's own sake. Maybe
Equador, British Columbia, etc aren't the 'main' areas of the disaster, but the impact of the quake/tsunami there still deserves a mention. Please don't
714:
and let me know if it would be useful for me to start any of those articles if the ports have been mentioned in the news, especially on a national or international level. I know that Gold Beach and Port Orford, near
Brookings, were also badly affected. Normally I wouldn't create articles just to
736:
Please be logical and try to stop your harsh control of the 2011 Sendai earthquake and tsunami article. "Japan's request" for international aid, as oddly and unusually small as it was, was merely a governmental statement. When countries like Australia, China, South Korea, etc, responded with
438:
1039:
True, i can see your viewpoint, and i can admit that my interest in the Vancouver Island area stems from me having a friend there, but i still think that all information about any area is worth mentioning. Besides, i added one sentence, it wasn't like i wrote a massively detailed report.
1235:
More sorry: I just discovered that there is a wikiproject "Earthquakes". Have to figure out how to join it and who in it is a person committed to quality (Do you know?). The current article on "prediction" is more like an article in the Boulevard press, than in an
1207:
Steps I have taken so far: I have added about 2 dozen high quality references in the beginning paragraphs of the article, and have corrected wrong and inaccurate statements, trying however to keep the structure and as much of the original text as possible.
690:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
1199:
Hello Flooded: I am new at Knowledge (XXG) and would like to contribute. I am not sure how best to proceed. I am contacting you because I have seen some well reasoned remarks regarding the Tohoku page, and think that perhaps you can give me advice.
1098:
I left a message on the talk page of that article in hope of further discussion. At first I didn't know what was the vandalism cause Flodded messaged me before he made the deletion. I am not insulted, but I saw this at the least a cultural view.
413:
have tried to add what I can, on both sides of the equation. (Edit: I will gladly admit I have removed more non-Japanese related material than I have added...simply because there has been an undue amount of it added to the article by others.) –
559:
Dear Flodded: Just a thought your way. Did you happen to read the Knowledge (XXG) posting on their survey reporting decreasing numbers of editors joining/staying with the project? If not, perhaps you might take a few moments to:
883:
Otherwise, why would've I asked you to go slow and learn the ropes? You don't have to fast-acting or perfect, you just need to be more consistent and then everything will come easily for you, eventually. Best and... really out.
1272:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
1211:
Looking down the page, I see some serious problems coming up. If I go in there and change what I know to be wrong, misleading, or slanted, I will be on a major collision course with the original author.
250:
Now I did see the California man listed under "Casualties", but considering there has been damage in the United States, I think it should be covered. It wasn't enough detail, in my opinion.
605:
I hope you guys are getting paid for this, devoting so much effort policing how the 2011 Sendai earthquake is being edited, which seems like a very stressful devotion! Good luck!!!
475:
Allow me to decorate this barnstar with a (textual) thank you cluster. Your tireless, thoughtful and civil contributions to this challenging event article are appreciated. --
762:
1113:
Note: Discussion moved to the article's talk page. I incorrectly assumed vandalism instead of assuming good faith, since the edit seemed out of place to me. My apologies. –
452:
It almost seems like every time I've refreshed my watchlist over the past three days there's been a thoughtful edit made or an insightful comment left on the various
186:
I would like to thank you for being civil and discussing via talk page rather than via edit summary. I approve your edit to remove the improper content altogether.
710:
Hi there. I see you have added info about the tsunami to the Oregon port articles that exist. Since I created several of those, I'm wondering if you could look at
711:
526:
by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
58:
1164:
minutes to put in, after another 10 minutes of trying I can't get it changed. It took me 5 minutes to put in a one comma earlier today. What a mess.
635:
628:
295:
931:
649:
814:
Well, what is done is done. Still, I hope you'll learn from this instead of letting it go this way back to me. Go slow and learn the ropes,
493:
that this user sure likes to encourage you to spread all around (since it's not like an STD ;))! Signed with all the best regards possible:
1297:
738:
606:
686:
1151:
990:
642:
453:
337:
383:
267:
237:
687:
1293:
83:
if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1027:
32:
1284:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1289:
118:
1011:) 02:52, 17 March 2011 (UTC) Edit: Also, this is not vandalism. Surely you can see that this is a good-faith edit.
462:
304:
84:
70:
653:
143:
1082:
While astrology has no business being presented in an earthquake article unless it got a LOT of media mentions,
1091:
742:
610:
456:
articles and talk pages by you... excellent job, please accept this barnstar for your tireless efforts :) --
1015:
677:
1144:
1137:
730:
191:
177:
25:
1285:
673:
405:
592:
576:
547:
501:
375:
259:
229:
210:
102:
37:
523:
519:
80:
479:
62:
1261:
1252:
952:
935:
298:, please follow the template's documentation and don't use "UTC" like in your last edit. Thanks! --
1087:
979:
972:
956:
939:
720:
285:
163:
126:
1281:
1265:
1114:
1041:
1019:
1004:
849:
788:
414:
1184:
1169:
1104:
1065:
355:
53:
44:
437:
466:
1241:
1224:
1045:
1023:
1008:
696:
587:
one is already being moderate is more than twice the challenge. Glad to see you're up for it.
187:
173:
1277:
1269:
815:
588:
572:
540:
494:
367:
326:
319:
251:
221:
206:
94:
1280:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1273:
715:
stash info about recent news, but it's a good incentive to do some expansion work. Thanks!
539:
PS Involving your snowman: don't be icy; please, stay involved in a warm conversation! :)
476:
397:
Here is the reply I left for both of them, for anyone who happens to bother reading this:
716:
531:
122:
1180:
1165:
1100:
1061:
893:
820:
767:
351:
151:
74:
1237:
1220:
692:
921:
I WILL BRUTALLY DISASSEMBLE YOU IF YOU CROP PHOTOS THAT I UPLOAD TO COMMONS AGAIN!
684:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
1060:
You left a message on my page about vandalism. Perhaps you got the wrong user?
409:
only reported as having had a "storm surge" and nothing more, is not notable.)
67:
You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page
147:
117:
I came to RFPP to do the same thing for the Sendai earthquake article and for
561:
457:
299:
220:
Excuse me? Where is this information? I added it because it wasn't there.
1216:
credentials than what I put into my wikipedia page, I can supply them).
1268:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
155:
1301:
1245:
1228:
1188:
1173:
1123:
1108:
1069:
1049:
1031:
986:
960:
943:
899:
858:
826:
797:
773:
746:
724:
700:
657:
614:
596:
580:
549:
503:
481:
423:
391:
359:
333:
308:
275:
245:
214:
195:
181:
130:
107:
926:
681:
509:
142:
Four people were swept out to sea by the tsunami off the coast of
1086:
should not have been referred to as vandalism. It is insulting.
676:
and Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should
140:
Sorry, but this is incorrect in the next section of the article
350:
the actual facts about the worldwide effects of this disaster.
158:
border, with two of them later found alive, one still missing,
20:
888:
PPS:I ain't no Admin and I don't want to be one, in any case.
1154:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
1136:
993:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
971:
645:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
627:
522:
and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the
508:
404:
I am trying to write from a long-term perspective and avoid
340:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
318:
162:. A man who was taking pictures of the tsunami waves on the
49:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was
296:
Talk:2011_Sendai_earthquake_and_tsunami#Timezone_in_infobox
172:
If it is really just one casualty, this must be corrected.
934:
article! Have you found out how to block IP ranges yet?
672:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
1083:
949:
758:
562:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/Wikipedia_Editors_Survey_2011
1159:
25m wave in 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami article
205:
My mistake on the move, thanks for pointing that out!
1260:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
636:Talk:2011_Sendai_earthquake_and_tsunami#template?
518:, Robster1983 has smiled at you! Smiles promote
555:Edit descriptions at the Sendai earthquake page
534:}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
168:was also swept out to sea and later found dead
930:Just kidding... keep up the good work on the
8:
113:Thanks for requesting RFPP on the earthquake
818:, right? We were all newbies once. Best. --
59:Federal Correctional Institution at Phoenix
1143:Hello, Flodded. You have new messages at
978:Hello, Flodded. You have new messages at
886:PS:I really need to catch some Zzz now...
634:Hello, Flodded. You have new messages at
325:Hello, Flodded. You have new messages at
1179:I just got an error trying to save this!
1003:remove information just because you can.
435:
41:was updated with a fact from the article
1219:Sorry, for the length of this message
571:Just some food for thought. Good luck.
428:
7:
932:2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami
816:nobody is asking you to be perfect
14:
1286:review the candidates' statements
1132:Earthquake+Tsunami+Nuclear crisis
446:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
925:
685:
667:
436:
24:
119:Fukushima 1 Nuclear Power Plant
1292:. For the Election committee,
1262:Arbitration Committee election
1253:ArbCom elections are now open!
1:
1302:14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
530:Smile at others by adding {{
429:I'll just leave this here...
108:06:04, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
1288:and submit your choices on
1317:
1294:MediaWiki message delivery
1246:08:20, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
1229:17:29, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
1189:17:21, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
1174:17:21, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
1124:03:49, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
1109:06:54, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
1070:06:26, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
1050:02:58, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
1032:02:54, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
987:00:48, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
961:21:46, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
944:00:36, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
900:17:52, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
859:17:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
827:17:42, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
798:17:36, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
774:17:26, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
747:14:55, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
725:05:55, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
701:14:58, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
658:13:59, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
615:14:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
597:14:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
581:13:48, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
550:23:56, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
504:23:53, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
482:17:53, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
467:20:07, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
424:03:34, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
392:22:20, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
360:20:39, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
334:18:28, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
309:12:42, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
276:18:48, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
246:18:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
215:04:14, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
196:01:42, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
182:01:18, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
131:00:53, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
17:DYK for Jared Lee Loughner
442:
104:Penny for your thoughts?
1145:Geofferybard's talk page
85:Did you know? talk page
1141:
976:
848:included in general. –
731:2011 Sendai Earthquake
632:
513:
323:
1266:Arbitration Committee
1195:Earthquake prediction
1140:
980:BurtAlert's talk page
975:
631:
512:
366:deserve some mention.
322:
188:Antonio Carlos Porto
174:Antonio Carlos Porto
63:2011 Tucson shooting
57:was detained at the
1270:arbitration process
164:Northern California
1282:arbitration policy
1152:remove this notice
1142:
991:remove this notice
977:
765:? Best and out. --
643:remove this notice
633:
514:
338:remove this notice
327:Coffee's talk page
324:
54:Jared Lee Loughner
45:Jared Lee Loughner
1204:Knowledge (XXG).
1121:
1081:
1035:
1018:comment added by
950:Guess who's back?
898:
890:
856:
825:
795:
772:
757:Per your earlier
663:Your recent edits
536:
472:
471:
421:
345:Sendai earthquake
91:
90:
78:
1308:
1155:
1119:
1079:
1034:
1012:
994:
929:
892:
885:
854:
819:
793:
766:
689:
671:
670:
646:
545:
528:
499:
454:Japan earthquake
440:
433:
432:
419:
386:
378:
370:
341:
290:
284:
270:
262:
254:
240:
232:
224:
136:Death toll in CA
105:
99:
68:
28:
21:
1316:
1315:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1290:the voting page
1256:
1197:
1161:
1156:
1149:
1134:
1077:
1058:
1013:
1000:
995:
984:
969:
918:
734:
708:
680:by typing four
678:sign your posts
668:
665:
650:184.144.160.156
647:
640:
625:
623:sendai template
557:
541:
537:
495:
490:
465:
431:
384:
376:
368:
347:
342:
331:
316:
307:
292:
288:
282:
268:
260:
252:
238:
230:
222:
203:
201:Tsunami article
138:
115:
103:
95:
33:27 January 2011
19:
12:
11:
5:
1314:
1312:
1259:
1255:
1250:
1234:
1196:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1160:
1157:
1148:
1135:
1133:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1088:SchmuckyTheCat
1076:
1073:
1057:
1054:
1053:
1052:
999:
996:
985:Message added
983:
970:
968:
965:
964:
963:
917:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
779:
778:
777:
776:
739:66.214.170.230
733:
728:
707:
704:
664:
661:
639:
626:
624:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
607:66.214.170.230
600:
599:
556:
553:
527:
507:
489:
486:
485:
484:
470:
469:
461:
449:
448:
443:
441:
430:
427:
395:
394:
346:
343:
332:Message added
330:
317:
315:
312:
303:
291:
280:
279:
278:
248:
202:
199:
137:
134:
114:
111:
89:
88:
79:and add it to
29:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1313:
1304:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1254:
1251:
1249:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1232:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1158:
1153:
1146:
1139:
1131:
1125:
1122:
1116:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1080:edit conflict
1075:Not vandalism
1074:
1072:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1010:
1006:
997:
992:
988:
981:
974:
966:
962:
958:
954:
951:
948:
947:
946:
945:
941:
937:
933:
928:
923:
922:
915:
901:
897:
896:
889:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
860:
857:
851:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
828:
824:
823:
817:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
799:
796:
790:
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
775:
771:
770:
764:
760:
756:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
744:
740:
732:
729:
727:
726:
722:
718:
713:
705:
703:
702:
698:
694:
688:
683:
679:
675:
662:
660:
659:
655:
651:
644:
637:
630:
622:
616:
612:
608:
604:
603:
602:
601:
598:
594:
590:
585:
584:
583:
582:
578:
574:
569:
565:
563:
554:
552:
551:
548:
546:
544:
543:Ρόμπστερ 1983
535:
533:
525:
521:
517:
516:Hello Flodded
511:
506:
505:
502:
500:
498:
497:Ρόμπστερ 1983
487:
483:
480:
478:
474:
473:
468:
464:
459:
455:
451:
450:
447:
444:
439:
434:
426:
425:
422:
416:
410:
407:
402:
398:
393:
390:
387:
385:contributions
382:
379:
374:
371:
364:
363:
362:
361:
357:
353:
344:
339:
335:
328:
321:
313:
311:
310:
306:
301:
297:
287:
281:
277:
274:
271:
269:contributions
266:
263:
258:
255:
249:
247:
244:
241:
239:contributions
236:
233:
228:
225:
219:
218:
217:
216:
212:
208:
200:
198:
197:
193:
189:
184:
183:
179:
175:
171:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
152:United States
149:
145:
144:Crescent City
135:
133:
132:
128:
124:
120:
112:
110:
109:
106:
100:
98:
86:
82:
76:
72:
66:
64:
60:
56:
55:
48:
47:
46:
40:
39:
38:Did you know?
34:
30:
27:
23:
22:
16:
1257:
1236:encyclopedia
1233:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1162:
1118:
1078:
1059:
1014:— Preceding
1001:
924:
920:
919:
894:
887:
853:
821:
792:
768:
754:
735:
709:
706:Oregon ports
666:
648:
570:
566:
558:
542:
538:
529:
515:
496:
491:
445:
418:
411:
406:WP:RECENTISM
403:
399:
396:
388:
380:
372:
348:
293:
272:
264:
256:
242:
234:
226:
204:
185:
167:
160:and one dead
159:
141:
139:
116:
96:
92:
52:
50:
43:
42:
36:
1056:Wrong user?
589:Wikiuser100
573:Wikiuser100
532:subst:Smile
369:Vchimpanzee
253:Vchimpanzee
223:Vchimpanzee
207:NYyankees51
154:, near the
97:HJ Mitchell
75:quick check
1278:topic bans
989:. You can
674:talk pages
477:joe decker
336:. You can
286:start date
148:California
71:here's how
61:after the
1274:site bans
1084:this diff
998:Vengance?
953:BurtAlert
936:BurtAlert
759:page move
755:@Flodded:
717:Valfontis
712:this list
123:NellieBly
51:... that
1248:MaxWyss
1231:MaxWyss
1181:Rmhermen
1166:Rmhermen
1150:You can
1101:Benjwong
1062:Benjwong
1028:contribs
1016:unsigned
967:Talkback
641:You can
524:WikiLove
520:WikiLove
352:Rmhermen
314:Talkback
81:DYKSTATS
1238:Maxwyss
1221:Maxwyss
1120:(gripe)
1115:flodded
1042:Swalgal
1020:Swalgal
1005:Swalgal
916:Tsunami
855:(gripe)
850:flodded
794:(gripe)
789:flodded
693:SineBot
420:(gripe)
415:flodded
1264:. The
763:WP:OWB
682:tildes
166:coast
156:Oregon
488:Smile
1298:talk
1242:talk
1225:talk
1185:talk
1170:talk
1105:talk
1092:talk
1066:talk
1046:talk
1024:talk
1009:talk
957:talk
940:talk
895:Dave
822:Dave
769:Dave
743:talk
721:talk
697:talk
654:talk
611:talk
593:talk
577:talk
458:gtdp
377:talk
356:talk
300:gtdp
294:Per
261:talk
231:talk
211:talk
192:talk
178:talk
127:talk
121:. --
1258:Hi,
463:(C)
305:(C)
31:On
1300:)
1276:,
1244:)
1227:)
1187:)
1172:)
1117:☃
1107:)
1094:)
1068:)
1048:)
1030:)
1026:•
959:)
942:)
891:--
852:☃
791:☃
745:)
723:)
699:)
691:--
656:)
613:)
595:)
579:)
564:.
417:☃
358:)
289:}}
283:{{
213:)
194:)
180:)
150:,
146:,
129:)
101:|
73:,
35:,
1296:(
1240:(
1223:(
1183:(
1168:(
1147:.
1103:(
1090:(
1064:(
1044:(
1022:(
1007:(
982:.
955:(
938:(
741:(
719:(
695:(
652:(
638:.
609:(
591:(
575:(
460:/
389:·
381:·
373:·
354:(
329:.
302:/
273:·
265:·
257:·
243:·
235:·
227:·
209:(
190:(
176:(
170:.
125:(
93:—
87:.
77:)
69:(
65:?
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
