User talk:Frank/Archive 3 - Knowledge (XXG)

3889:

templates is entirely optional and was a system that was introduced as an aid to formatting reference sources. The citation templates have not been able to be rewritten to adopt to other style guides. If there was a template that would conform to MLA standards, I would gladly use them because of the ease of just dropping the information in. There is not a means to do that at present without an editor creating a unique template. One of the issues that has been addressed on numerous occasions in style guide forums is that the templates are written for an ISO dating standard that is not easily read or understood by all readers. The typical month day, year or (in the case of this article), day month year style cannot be worked into the template. Talk about a lack of consistency, with the body of the article written in one style while the reference notations are written in an entirely different style. There are also many small template issues that do not allow for multiple authors, publishing dates (not placed by author's name), lack of punctuation "stops" and many other niggling problems that continue to befuddle the template designers. Usually when I detect errors in formatting, I correct them, and as you can readily discern, I am not enamoured with the citation templates. When I first came upon this article, it was due to a disagreement over the naming convention which popped up on my watchlist. On first reading, I observed numerous verbatim copyviols that were present from the very first submission to the article's "string", and this discovery was the main reason for my interest in the article. I do not particularly care for the style of writing that is inherent in the article as it is mainly an amalgam of other author's writing styles and not even very artfully cribbed. My two options were one: suspend the editing regime of the article and begin the task of correcting the plagarism, by rewriting one sentence at a time or two: completely rewrite the article from "scratch", again indicating that a major rewrite was in progress. Although you may have begun the process, I attempted to inform interested editors of the problems "buried" in the article, but did not elaborate as I am not blaming any of the current editors on the copyviols. I added an "under construction" tag to highlight the upcoming efforts and began the first option, necessitating a longer and more comprehensive edit. When I saw that you and other editors were also making substantial edits and changes, I tried to incorporate those changes, but as I had noted earlier, this is not a "be-all" or "end-all" project for me. As opposed to many editors, I use Knowledge (XXG) writing and editing as a work exercise, honing and sharpening my editing skills. (In my other life, I am an author and editor, after a career as a librarian.) FWiW

1009:

What I find with Knowledge (XXG) these days, is, to find out some detail/meat on a subject, one has to go to the edits and look at stuff that has been deleted. There seems to be a huge effort by people to delete stuff on subjects they know nothing about. I just got through going around in circles with a guy (I think he was also a Knowledge (XXG) administrator) where he deleted all sorts of stuff from the bio of Anthony Senter (a convicted Lucchese/Gambino mobster doing life for multiple murders). The whole bio was taken from a well-known book called "Murder Machine" and it was referenced at the bottom under "References", but this guy wanted everything deleted if it didn't have a citation at the end of each sentence. I had to tell him that the entire article came from that one book (and it's a good book, written by a well-known NY crime reporter). What the guy/administrator should have done is first known the subject matter then edit - that way, he would have known that the whole thing was in fact already referenced at the bottom. I tried putting in a few links but I couldn't get them to work (somebody else fixed them). It's really too much work to go around and around in circles with these guys (they seem to be "busybodies") as they delete and delete and delete, when in fact the items are either (1) well known to anybody that knows the subject matter (like Conrad's friendship with Spilotro), or (2) they are very easily found. The way you are running things here at Knowledge (XXG), the only entries will be made by administrators like yourself who know Knowledge (XXG)'s syntax, etc. You will either not get edits from people like me, or, if you do, they will be deleted. I have no interest in spending the time to become a Knowledge (XXG) administrator or Knowledge (XXG) edit expert.

3846:

indicated previously. I noted the errors and then corrected the citation (more citations have again appeared introducing new errors). It has very little to do with the templates, you might have first started to use them, but they do not conform with the bibliography or notes now in use in the article. If you prefer templates, then go and change everything to a template and I will simply retire from the fray. It's not a big deal to me, it was mainly an article that I came across that indicated serious problems in structure and I tend to get involved in editing on that level. BTW, the template issue is entirely spurious as it is an optional format that was devised to help editors with little or no cataloging background to have a "drop-and-drag" system. The templates were never intended to be mandatory nor should they be. FWiW, I don't get the dig about school papers? you are not in favour of properly formatted bibliographic cataloging?

1599:

meantime, rather than having me act as a coach, if you do have any questions, feel free to simply ask and I'll do my best to answer or direct you to someone who can. My main interest in nominating you is that I thought you were ready the first time and I saw the primary reason for opposing was that folks didn't think you'd been around quite long enough for them to judge. Another month will help that even more. I'm not a regular RfA nominator; I think there's way too much politicking and I'm not into that at all. (That may be a plus or a minus; not sure.) There is perhaps one other candidate I'd be interested in nominating, but I don't have an agenda, a schedule, or even a to-do list. When you're ready, and if you would like me to nominate, let me know. And, if you'd rather ask someone else, or self-nominate, I'll gladly support.

4079:

not permitted here. (I believe many times that editors think "anyone can edit" translates to "anyone can do anything they want".) I chose 24 hours specifically to have the best chance of conveying b) to the editor, without appearing to be punitive (always a fine line to walk). A shorter block might not even be noticed by the student who has a free period at the same time every day, for example. I definitely saw the edit you referenced; that was the one I blocked for. My own opinion is that such vicious edits are most often worthy of an immediate indef block. In this case, however, since the user has demonstrated some desire in the past to contribute constructively, I thought indef was too harsh. We can always indef an editor "tomorrow" (figuratively), but we cannot always encourage a formerly contributing editor to return.

3786:

the switch from ISO to Military-style dating was apparent as a conflict in the citation styles. What I use is a full text cataloguing of the citation into a Modern Language Association (MLA) style guide which is typical for works that are in the social sciences (bear with me, I was a former librarian) into which a biographical work would neatly fit. The second thing is that our Knowledge (XXG) templates for citations do not accommodate the MLA variations as they are written in a American Psychological Association (APA) style that is at odds with the MLA standard in a number of areas. As I indicated, nothing wrong with your references, just a matter of a reader seeing them in a consistent fashion. FWiW, I certainly understand you have a lot of passion for this subject.

1983:. Notability for the product was not established or even asserted, and its entire content was a rehash of why you would want to buy/license/download the software. The fact that the software is free, open source, and/or non-commercial does not automatically confer notability and does not automatically preclude the article from being advertising. (You can certainly advertise a freely available product.) I make no representation as to the product itself; it is possible it is notable and worthy of an article. However, as it was written and nominated, it clearly met the criteria for speedy deletion. The existence of an article on de.wikipedia.org does not affect that decision; it was deleted on its own merits. 3867:

formatted and cited - and then hack it apart under the guise of "conforming with the bibliography or notes now in use". It just doesn't make sense to me, since there was nothing to conform to before I got to it. I most certainly didn't put any copyvio text in there, and I removed a bunch of stuff that really didn't belong anyway, and found and properly cited most of the refs in the article. I am not trying to drive anyone away from the article, nor am I claiming anything is required or optional. I'm giving a reason for using the citation templates and attempting to discuss why you changed them. Nothing more, nothing less, and certainly nothing personal.

1058:

my router for a few minutes and go get a new IP. It is people like you that limit the usefulness of Knowledge (XXG). Oh, and by the way, I didn't get that bit about Lampert losing money from a "source" - it's original authorship - all you have to do is punch in SHLD and C in any quote site. How do you "cite" that - the link would just take someone to a quote site - they reader probably wouldn't even know the ticker symbols for Sears and Citicorlp (just as I am sure you do not know them). I hope the life you are building around what you are doing (you basically live on Knowledge (XXG)), following people around, is worth it.

944:

It's quite well known. You didn't even bother to do even a minimum of research. I notice this a lot in Knowledge (XXG) - people deleting things they know nothing about, on subjects they know nothing about, and not bothering to do any research. For the record, I don't delete or even modify anything if I do not know the subject matter quite well. I don't know why you edited this out - you obviously know very little about Robert Conrad. Anyway, I've put it back in, with the very first link I found, which was the very first entry that comes up on Google when you put in both their names. Duh.

721:

warning" or skipping straight to "this is your final warning" on really minor vandalism edits. (Not the blatant F-U sorts, mind you.) Here's someone who went away for six months and put one external link for a magazine; I kinda figured the reminder looks like it did the trick. I truly think of vandals as kids who do, despite our best efforts, need to be told "yes, we're serious" every so often. I also think that blocking the account has the chance of resulting in a sock, maybe 3 months more down the road, maybe a year...more complication for us.

1960:

program should not be a problem for Knowledge (XXG), should it? At least it would be nice to discuss possible improvements to the article prior to deleting it. The german article is perfectly fine and updated on a regular base. Since the software also comes in english and is currently in use for non-commercial english fan games it would be nice to have the information online again in the english Knowledge (XXG). I would be happy to hear from you, Robert. --

2940: 4979: 31: 2831: 1160: 843:.” A simple search on the Internet will give you lots of information on comparatives and superlatives, or simply finding the words at www.Dictionary.com will also let you know into which category words fall when using them as comparatives and superlatives. If you find the word with –er, -est on its suffix then it falls into that category and if not, then it must be more, most. 1317:, but please feel free to contact me for anything I can help with. Regarding barnstars, I don't think I've given even three...but you were well-deserving. (I'm not really about barnstars, and I don't think you are either, even though you do have a few. I get the impression you're really more about the content, as I believe I am.) Anyway, thanks, and all the best to you! 1869: 2481:

around privately, that's fine too, this isn't a "gotcha". What I'm hoping we'll get by the end of the discussion is a set of representative answers from everyone who has an opinion, so that when anyone posts a silly question at RFA, we don't have to go through all this mess again, we can just link to a summary of the community's response. (Watchlisting) - Dan

3752: 3718: 1201: 3061:” (actually I tried to sum it up as neutral as possible), I'd like to make a point I deem more important here. Whilst I still think my course of action back then was not indefensible, with hindsight I now agree that the course of action you explained at that time would have been better than mine. Just wanted to point that out. :) Best wishes, — 4009:

errors. (That may be somewhat my reception of the comment.) I am much more interested in getting it right as far as what we are putting in the article. As for BRD, well...let's not forget the D part of that. BRBRBR is the same as "edit war" and not constructive. I think discussion about the article probably belongs on its talk page, too.

3021: 1159: 832:

changes to lines of code in a program, I would have endeavoured to learn something about programming language and what you were changing before rendering judgment. Likewise, I provided enough information in my change summary to lead you to learn something about comparatives and superlatives and it is unfortunate that you did not.

322:, a composer who has not written music for any Square Enix titles in the past. This instance of deference to Square Enix Music Online seems somewhat unfair to other fansites that would honestly wish to treat Knowledge (XXG) as a repository of links, were it not for their consideration for respecting the greater online community. 767:

spammed alot earlier this year. Also, in general I don't agree with the "not editing right now" approach for accounts. it makes sense for Ip editors, since we have no reason to think the same person will be back. But for an account, we do. Thanks for the comments, and I'm going to block indef, with your kind permission. --

2804:. I wanted to thank you for weighing in on the RFA--I will do everything I can to uphold the policies of this site, and try to make it a better place. All the comments, questions, and in particular the opposes I plan to work on and learn from, so that I can hopefully always do the right thing with the huge trust given to me. 315:. I agree that the fansite is not notable and that its numerous copyright violations are problematic--the site is in no way affiliated with companies Square Enix or Square Enix Music. I was interested to know why it is listed in the number one or two spots in the external links sections of various composer pages. 530: 836:

is higher than yours” and “my ladder is the highest.” Common mistakes among native English speakers are to say and write, “more likely,” “more widely,” and “funner,” and “funnest.” The word “fun,” funnily, is a more, most comparative and superlative, as opposed to funny, which is “funnier” and “funniest.”

4101:

Well said. I agree, and that is why I have let the user choose his own time of return. A simple promise to no act racist or abusively while on Knowledge (XXG) is all that the user needs to become unblocked. Keeping that promise is all the user needs to stay unblocked. This way the user can be blocked

4059:

I hope you do not mind, but I have taken my own direction with this user's block. I think it is incumbent on this user to give some sort of indication that he understands that racist comments are not acceptable before he is unblocked. I have the user's talk page on my watch list and if at any time he

3845:

Without going into details here, this article was suspect of being a copyviol and I was changing it entirely to remove any possibility that the work was plagiarized. There were also tiny errors inherent in the citations, mainly missing author, title, publisher information and use of the ISO dating as

3658:

I believe you need to focus on content rather than individual users. If you start taking things personally every time someone disagrees with your edits, you will not find this to be rewarding for very long. There are many people around here and we all have to find a way to make things work within the

3506:

is a reason for deletion. These are mistakes I see at AfD often. If the article's subject is noteworthy and the article itself is neutral, it doesn't matter who wrote it. That the author of that article is highly likely to be its subject is not in doubt...it's just beside the point of the discussion.

3368:

I was going to tweak it a bit but...doesn't look like it needs it. So far, so good! You might consider putting {{RfX-notice|a}} on your user page and/or your talk page. A check of current candidates indicates that some do and some don't; totally your choice. (It's 50/50 on the four other than yours.)

2602:

There are 2 antagonists who continue to want to make this page a jewish issue. i simply reverted it, and compromised with Laurelton. I doubt these two propagandists would write "muslim" or "arab" parents. i am just going to keep reverting it each time they add "jewish" to describe the parents. it

2138:

Thank you so much for stepping in as a third nom. It didn't seem to have the effect you (or I) would have wished, but then I also contributed in my own way to the failure. It's been, and will be, a great learning experience - for one thing I have met a whole load more excellent editors like you. Best

1598:

Whenever you think is an appropriate time is fine with me; I'll be ready to write a nominating statement. I'm not a real big fan of admin coaching, nor do I participate in such, but I'm not against it, either. If you wanted to find someone to do coaching, there are certainly respected choices. In the

699:

Hi Frank, not to step on your toes, but if an account is given a final warning for spamming, and returns a few months later to spam the same website, I don't think we need to "remind" them of what we told them earlier in the year, nor give them a pass because we didn't happen to catch it the same day

4270:

Yeah well. The problem is that no matter where or how often I complain to him, he just ignores it and makes his changes. The only times I've seen him actually react to the issue were the two times I reported him, and in neither case did he address me directly nor tried to explain his case. I, on the

4078:

Different admins have different takes on this particular issue. This was definitely a borderline case. The editor was being disruptive and inappropriate, and had never been blocked, so I chose a block of 24 hours to a) stop the disruption immediately, and b) convey to the editor that the activity is

3931:

Now, I am mystified? what consensus is being challenged? The issues were explained clearly above. The article was under construction, editors were welcome to contribute and edits took place, back-and-forth. In order to see the difference in citation style, read the article in both "reader" and "edit

3866:

citations. I put citations in, and they were correct, and you went and reformatted them completely, which irked me a bit. It's one thing to fix an article's content - this is a collaborative effort, after all. It's quite another to take content that was just put in there - carefully and consistently

3810:

chance that dates can be formatted in the user's preferred format. When we explicitly write them out in our own preferred format (APA, MLA, or whatever), any such chance is eliminated. That's why I use {{cite}} exclusively, and that's why I have questioned the change. As for establishing a format or

1550:

Good morning Frank, and thank you for the message. I'm certainly very happy that you think I'm ready for another crack at adminship, but could we wait for another month or so? Although I'm happy with the progress I've made since the RfA, there are some things I'd like to do here before trying again,

835:

Words fall into two different categories and none are in both: Words are either –er, -est comparatives and superlatives, or they are more, most. You probably would not and should not ever say “my ladder is more high than yours” and “my ladder is the most high.” You would say, correctly, “my ladder

3785:

Hi Frank, nice talking to you via this electronic note. I really appreciate your edits on this subject and I would like to explain my reasoning behind the citations. The first being consistency, once I had established a format or bibliographic style, I tend to use the same format relentlessly, and

2016:

There is an ongoing issue with Kung Fu Man over an edit dispute which is getting out of hand, and I'm fairly certain the user is relying on sockpuppets to make revisions to the article. Check the revision history yourself to verify this. Also, I've been receiving harassing comments and threats from

1057:

I see must have touched a raw nerve with you - you are now following me around. Why not delete all the other stuff in Eddie Lampert's bio that is unsourced? Oh, I see, you are not really being professional at this - you are being a busybody and just want to follow me around. Fine, I'll go unplug

824:

However, my changes should hardly have been labelled vandalism by you, the Knowledge (XXG) definition being: “Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Knowledge (XXG). The most common types of vandalism include the addition

766:

warnings for "hi mom" edits. Also, there are a lot of "you wimpy admins should resign if you won't block this IP address indef" complaints. But in this particular case, I'm going to block indef because it's not so much test edits, as a resumption of spamming another website; the same website they

182:

I quite agree with you that it is borderline. In my opinion it is on the speedy deletion side of the border, not because the author is not notable but because notability is not demonstrated by the article itself. The creator clearly could ask for a deletion review if he wanted. Lots of people do,

4672:

Well, according to evidence presented at Syjytg's talkpage, it is apparent that Syjytg used an IP address to evade the block (he would deny it, of course). I think he is a sockpuppet of Shabushabu because of his edits, and his repeated appeal to be unblocked almost immediately after the block went

4030:

Frank, I honestly think we are both on the same side and as I frequently have said, our Wickywacky world operates best as a "collaborative" effort and I do not intend to do everything possible to adhere to that principle. Now to completely change the subject, can you look over vandal attacks (your

2480:

thread: "There have been many off-the-wall RFA questions, Frank, and many answers, so if you believe they tell us something useful about the candidate, please pick one and tell us how it helped make your decision." You don't have to answer, this isn't RFA :) Or if you'd rather bounce these ideas

2280:

I cannot believe you deleted 2 hours of my time! the article was sourced and the topic was applicable. at the very least you could create a Recovery of Funds page for Madoff. i don't know why you have more power than i do, but you are doing a disservice to those who might get a lead to research

1524:

I would probably Oppose again for the same reason as last time. I have high standards I suppose. I don't like the already slim Project space being almost exclusivley Wikiprojects and AfD. Just like how when I have waffles and syrup, I get the syrup in all the squares; not just two or three, unless

943:

Frank, I've reversed your deletion in the Robert Conrad entry for his friendship with mafia hitman/murderer Tony Spilotro. You deleted because it was "uncited". All you had to do was go to Google and Google " 'Robert Conrad' 'Spilotro' " and it is the very first entry - in an interview he gave.

831:

As to my changes, they were and still are correct and are grammatical fact, as opposed to two different ways to state the same thing. I noticed that your background is in Science and Industrial Technology, as opposed to English and English grammar. If the situation were reversed and you had made

820:

Frank, I am still very new to editing and navigating through Knowledge (XXG), so please do not take anything that I have done as vandalism, much less trying to post a message here for you to read. To that end, I have tried to research and deduce the correct procedure to respond to you and this is

481:

Thanks for your action Frank, and for the feedback regarding my two recent edit summaries. I've added another comment to the editor's talk page for the "chris shay" reversion. In regard to the second summary, I doubt there's anything I can do for "Rex", but hopefully that editor isn't heading for

3988:

The templates have an inherent formatting and programming problem, if you do not list author notations, in the proper order, it will spit it back, first name, last name, ISO dating is also used, the notations as to title were incorrectly made, not identifying each as primary or corollary title or

3628:

I am sick and tired of sockpuppets of Darvit Chundarai. He has created multiple socks. I see you have blocked one of his anon for harassing me, but it seems he created another one, so it will never end. I will be subjected to endless harassment and I have to keep on reverting his edits on various

1959:

Hi Frank, I dropped by to ask you if you contacted the Visionaire-team before deleting the article about their software? ("Visionaire (software)") I wrote that article. It was about a free software for non-commercial users with many fans who liked the old adventure games. Listing facts about that

1008:

No, actually, we're not here for the same reason. I don't have a lot of experience with Knowledge (XXG), and I'm not here to do lots of work on Knowledge (XXG), and I don't read their policies (would take too much time - not really interested - I'm an armchair reader/editor of Knowledge (XXG)).

391:

You'd have to check on those pages to determine if it was appropriate to add the link. I wouldn't automatically assume that because a site doesn't have enough notability to have its own article that it would not be appropriate to have an external link to it. On the other hand, it's quite possible

720:

Explanation: I've been getting the feeling that I've been seeing more reports at AIV that aren't worthy; people want to shoot first and ask questions later...and often they aren't even interested in the asking part. (This is on the part of users, mind you, not admins.) Lots of "this is your only

276:

about makers' marks (or "maker's mark", as appropriate), or create a new article, preferably in your own user space first, and then move it to the main space. Then we can redirect from the disambiguation page to the appropriate target. There's a link in the welcome message I sent you about "Your

4646:

That's what I would do. I don't think it's productive to threaten to block a user when they are already blocked. Also, I don't have any opinion on the sockpuppet accusation, other than to say that it might be best to get better evidence and a second opinion on the matter rather than placing the

4289:

No, the fact is that he is only making changes this week. For the previous few weeks or months, it has been 5 decimal places and nobody reverted it, either because they think it is correct or they are ignorant of it, so it the onus of Antti29 to gain consensus before he can revert the original

4008:

Well, I would say that what you are characterizing as "errors" are "formatting", not errors in the citations. The cites themselves are carefully researched and cited; understanding that you prefer them to be listed a different way is quite a bit different than understanding that they contained

4690:

I have no comment on the sockpuppet stuff; it's not an area I'm very familiar with. On the warning, I don't see the need to re-issue the warning when the block expires. I think we can let it pass for the moment and see if Syjytg changes his editing habits when he returns. If so, no need to do

3888:

To be clear, I mean no disrespect. I found there were errors in the citations. I corrected them, and in correcting, I used a full text bibliographic style. What you characterize as "hacking your work apart" is nothing of the sort, I meticulously maintained the information. The use of citation

2965:

Thanks for the note about the number of edits. I know the requirements are not set in stone but after doing some research about the other current RfA's I see I still have a lot of work to do. feel free to delete that RfA page when you are ready. I will call you if I wish to make another RfA.

878:

My characterization of your edits with the word "vandalism" is not based on any single edit itself; rather, the several changes you've made under the guise of "grammar fixes" are viewed as incorrect by more than one editor (myself included). Persistent introduction of errors or edits against

700:

he did it. In a similar situation a few weeks ago, I was kind of a dick to Tanthalas and just blocked an account he had commented on but not blocked. Don't want to do that again, so I'll ask if you've got a problem with me blocking the account? Your call, I'll leave it if you want me to. --

108:. If having a few books published was in itself notable, I'd have a wikipedia article myself. My main concern - though admittedly not the reason I gave for deletion - was that it looked terribly like self-promotion. The references were not independent. It had also been speedied previously. 249:

I intended to have the note redirect (at least the portion about makers' marks) to ceramic arts. I noticed there was no information about makers' marks which are a pretty big deal in the ceramics arts field, and I think is a pretty interesting topic. I hoped at a later date, when I am more

2987:. Regarding your talk page, it's not usually necessary to strike out text once you've read it. People tend to keep their talk pages as a running history of conversations, and when they get too long, they archive the contents to another page. (There are automated ways to do this as well.) 1897:

Thats fine, but I did NOT, I repeat did NOT set up that "Theplaystation3dude" account, and before I go could you please do me one more favour?, I heard that there is no way to delete a wikipedia account (which I want to do) BUT I heard Aministrators could do it and seeing as you are an

497:

No problem. I saw your comment already; looked good. Now we need to check for sources :-) On the other one, I was amused; I was just pointing out that some editors think everything has to be 100% serious around here. I think it can be serious with a little humor every so often. Cheers!

3552:. I have seen cases of the Afb, but it is all pertaining to the wheel warring issue. Do you know where I can see all cases consisting of all types of issues? Also in the voting tally, there are 4 digits. I know the first one is accept. What are the other 3 headings of the vote tally? 156:

I hope you take my discussion on this as exactly that - discussion. I'm a relatively new with the mop (4 months) and I don't claim to always be right. To me this is a borderline case; I'm not trying to badger you but really just asking for the sake of refining my own opinion on this.

2091:

Question (not a joke): if someone asks "Is the moon made of green cheese?" at RFA, should I leave a note on their talk page asking them not to ask those kinds of questions at RFA? As I mentioned at WT:RFA, some candidates honestly don't get that many voters like to take a serious,

349:. I was not the deleting administrator, although I did nominate it for deletion. The community consensus was that it was not notable. If you can establish that it is, then recreating the article would be appropriate. If you wish to contest the deletion of the article, please visit 4907:

I have nominated the page for deletion and for the moment I am delaying any action. I am unconvinced that your attempt to resurrect the page is the best thing in this situation but as I have put it before the community, I hope the correct course of action can be decided shortly.

2281:

their tax options. this is worse than a teacher telling you to write "I hate the wikipedia website" 1,000 times after school because the student copied from it! i am finished here for a long time --- you caused that---hope you feel powerful. go find someone else to torture!

1116:

We have multiple sources, some are Jewish sources, others are even news agencies. I've seen much worse sources used on WP before. Why is him being Jewish a fact that we need to coverup? Is it because it plays into people's stereotypes? That's the only reason I can think of.

2154:

I'm dismayed as to how this turned out. I hope you won't let it affect your participation in the project, and if adminship appeals to you, we can try again in a couple of months. I really do believe you'd be an asset as an administrator if that's where your interest lies.

2915:

No problem, although I do have to admit I noticed there were already 3 deleted edits, so something might have been restored that shouldn't have been. I'll have to be more careful next time. I know you coulda done it yourself, but I didn't know if you were around. Cheers!

1898:

Administrator, Could you please delete my wikipedia account for me, I am ABSOLUTELY POSITIVE about this and I do NOT want to go back, do not leave a comment on my talk page asking me If I'm sure I want it deleted please, I am sure about this, deadly serious, thank you!--

4199:

i have no clue what you are referring to, the talk comment? all i did was copy a poem to get my point across, which is in circulation and copied in every classroom. you are "wildly" confusing and making something from nothing...which many on this web site tend to do.

4592:

Yes, I'm fully aware of the situation. I've tried contacting Syjytg every way I could think of but he has never replied. I'm delighted to see that you admins have common sense and also use it, but I wish that one day people outside Finland got my first name right :)

3861:

No dig; it's just that the point is citation, not whether it's MLA, APA, or neither. The point is to get the info in there, as much as possible. As for the tiny errors inherent in the citations, here's the crux of the issue: when I got to the article, there were

224:- it seems you've created a redirect back to itself. Typically disambiguation pages list other pages in the encyclopedia, not back to themselves...at least that's the way I've seen it. Can you clarify what you're intending with that Maker's Mark page? Thanks! 1088:

policy for details; all you need to read is the nutshell on the top of that page to understand how that policy applies. And, I have over 500 pages on my watch list. If you create an account, you can automatically watch pages you are interested in as well.

883:

as much as anything, and while none of us may be able to achieve the exact wording we want all the time, we do have to strive to achieve something that we can agree on. The best forum for a change in wording of this type would be on the talk page of the

3695: 1163:

Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed, all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced. Mizu onna

2867:

Hey, no problem...I had actually hit "undo" on that edit as well, and thought my edit took, so I was following up with him. It wasn't until I went back to the RfA and looked at the history that I saw you had done the same...apparently beating

2519:

Apologies. I stopped after the first one I reverted, in some bit of confusion as to why they'd suddenly (at least to me) disappeared. Thanks for the pointer to the talk page. Don't know that it's resolved, but it's certainly out of my hands.

730:

cool with it. I even considered if a username block was in order, edits aside. It's borderline on both issues. If you feel more strongly, I've said as much as needs to be said (more, probably) and won't raise any ruckus. Thanks for asking!

2646:

says that links shouldn't be in the subject headers. I disagree, and I think you were right when you put them in there. If we could work together to get that policy changed, I think it would be a great benefit to Knowledge (XXG) readers.

3713:

passed successfully earlier today, and it's pretty obvious a lot of that success was down to your excellent nomination. So, as a gesture of my appreciation for all your work, have a barnstar on me! It's the least I can do to say thanks

1127:

No coverup. We just need reliable sources. Blogs don't qualify, and the Pakistani editorial (I use the term very loosely) doesn't either. Those are opinions. We need citations from reliable sources, or it can't go in the article, per

3819:

in the article, so I'm kind of wondering how establishing "a format or bibliographic style" applies. I started with the citation template and used it for every subsequent citation as well. What you have done is completely change an

250:

comfortable working in Knowledge (XXG), to add an article specifically about Marks. I am still learning how this Knowledge (XXG) system works and may have made a mistake through ignorance. If you have any coaching, I welcome it!

4495:

Sorry - Frank I saw you did the original block. I was just reviewing unblock requets 2 when I note you declined - as the original blocking admin I don't think you should have reviewed it - would you leave it with me for a moment?

2187: 3806:, although I do feel there is a whole lot of good work to be done on the article. Regarding APA/MLA...we're not writing school papers here. We're writing an online encyclopedia. When we use a template-based citation, there is 2586:

Thanx again. you are better at this than I am. I suggested adding new pages to link to on the Madoff talk page. perhaps you can do that for Cohmad and Fairfield Greenwich. It will help with cleaning the Madoff article.

4545:

No problem with the block on Syjytg. Clear vio and user has gotten off before. The only thing I'll say is that ... well ... there was a good case for blocking Anti too, a case I shan't make since he's already been warned!

4063:

I have used indefinite in duration not to mean "forever", but to mean duration not yet determined. This users editing pattern is a bit spaced out in time so it may be a while. Just letting you know where I am coming from.

3034:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!

2306:. And, the work is not gone forever; it's all there in the history of the article, so if you can find an appropriate place to put it (perhaps a separate article as you suggest), you can certainly recover the work easily. 1929:. However, I'd like to stress that a premature RfA is not really grounds for this sort of action; it is merely a reflection of the community's standards for adminship, not a personal opinion of your editing skills. 4891:

Hi, can you not delete this page please. The information posted is disturbing and I have sent details to the police for their perusal and referenced this page. I thought that was best as this user may be a danger.

2626:

Ok, you said you'd help. You're right in that those vote tallies are big and might be better in another article even if I don't agree on your assessment of their importance. Hopefully this will be a good solution.

2069:. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Knowledge (XXG) policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted. 1294:

I totally missed your RfA - would have chimed in and mentioned how indiscriminate you are in giving out barnstars...... Very belated congrats - hope you don't mind if I ask for help from time to time! All best

146:

Regarding the previous CSD, it was a correct A7, more than a year before this recent recreation of the article, which was substantially longer. As for self-promotion - I totally agree, and throw in a helping of

2092:

job-interview-style approach to RFA, and being flippant may provoke a flip response from the candidate. Perhaps we should put "ignore joke questions" in the instructions. (Watchlisting for a few days.) - Dan

1410:? I'm not asking for a full review, but your quick general thoughts would be appreciated. I've asked a number of opposers from the original RfA to comment here...basically, do you think it's time yet? Thanks! 4691:

anything else. If not, we can always warn again. I would also add that an "only warning" is not really useful in this case; Syjytg has been here plenty long enough that such a warning pretty much falls under

4673:

into effect. Yes, the evidence is circumstantial at best, but it is evidence nonetheless under WP:DUCK. As for the warning, I will remove it for the time being. I will re-warn the user after he is unblocked.

426:. The fansite undid the revision. User Semoderm just added links to Square Enix Music Online to the top of the external links sections of an additional twelve pages, including non-Square Enix composers 2571:

Thanx 4 your assistence. Perhaps we can insert the supreme court case as time goes on. please retain it in your notes so we can retrieve it once the legal strategy to avoid state charges is disclosed.

1820:

In other words what you are saying Frank is that you could verify a lie printed in a publication and you could list it here on Knowledge (XXG) as a "truth". That just does not make any sense at all.

825:

of obscenities or crude humor, page blanking, or the insertion of nonsense into articles. Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism.”

3171:. That will get faster action than asking an individual admin. So far, the user has only 3 edits total, and the last one was 15 days ago, so I don't think we need to worry too much about this one. 346: 861:

Shawn - thanks for your detailed, considered message on these edits. However, I must respectfully disagree on the point of English grammar. Please read the sentences in full by checking out

375:

I agree with the community consensus that it was not notable. I'm wondering why, if this is the case, the site is listed on the external links section of pages unrelated to Square Enix.

4431:

I believe this user has gone too far, and he is openly disregarding the MOS, and making disruptive edits to prove his intent. I think he should be banned immediately. What do you think?

789:

Not a problem at all. I should also have added that being relatively new myself, and not feeling strongly on this one, the opportunity to discuss and refine doesn't hurt either. Thanks!

2777:

Tell me what you think. It's coming along. The cite news tags need to go in later, right now it's mostly just a skeleton still, but each new day adds a little meat to that skeleton.

1178: 650:

did as well. Don't know if there's any relation. Was just commenting that I noticed; I kinda felt like blocking but wasn't sure about it. Just keeping in the loop, I guess. Cheers!

2603:

is irrelevant since the page is about him, not his parents. the talk page cannot resolve it. if you are an editor, please do so, or refer to the editors for relevance. thanx.

1620:

Just to chime in again. I agree that admin coaching is not the way to go - there's no need - you'll learn much more delving into to 3O and continuing project space work. However

137:'s 3000+, but at what point do you think notability is determined? I usually go by whether or not the title(s) are self-published and/or vanity-published, which these do 4445:

is a community-based decision, not based simply on what you or I think. I also think that, despite all evidence to the contrary (and there's plenty), we lose nothing by

3908:

means around here, but the article is expanding and I guess that is the main goal. (I am still mystified as to what errors you found in the citations I added, however.)

3122:

edits being pushed on it? I don't want to seem heavy-handed as the only (human) one warning editors over it. (And please let me know here if you have added it.) Thanks!

3571:? I don't really follow that drama stuff too closely, and I suggest you don't either. Work on building the encyclopedia; it's the best reason I know of for being here. 3993:

cycle, rather than what you characterized. As I indicated earlier, I am trying to be cognizant that all actions are above board. FWiW, keep this dialogue flowing.

3236:

I have looked (twice now) but I don't see the need to do anything. Seems like some folks arguing a bit; it happens. Is there something you think needs to be done?

3167:

Just follow the normal procedures; if a vandalism edit occurs, revert it and warn the user. When the user reaches a final warning (usually 4th warning), report to

2197: 536: 2731: 4860: 4290:

version. The fact that my version has been there for a long period of time before Antti29 changes the format show that many users are supportive of my format.

3051: 2801: 2032:

I'm not sure I can offer anything in this discussion. I did look at the discussion and it looks largely like a content dispute, not a sockpuppetry case to me.

1477:

too weak for me to be comfortable. Enough effort has been made in that direction that I would now support with only a reminder to take it slowly at first. —

4109:" when it comes to these types of decisions. If you think a fixed length block is more appropriate you have my blessings in reversing my decision. Thank you. 828:

Regardless of what you thought of my changes, which were changing “more closely” to “closer” and “more widely” to “wider” could hardly fit that definition.

3710: 3326: 1906:) 15:11, 5 January 2009 (UTC) And also when your deleting my user profile can you please delete all my edits, and eveything to do with my user, thank you.-- 1407: 4353:

The user is ignoring all my warnings and now yours too and he continues abusing the two articles he's been warned about. A time for the admins to step in?

2354: 970:

for that article so that the information could be properly added in a verifiable way. Since you clearly have way more experience with Knowledge (XXG), its

205:

I appreciated your welcome note and the helpful information for new users. It has certainly pointed me in the right direction! Thanks for all your work.

3614:

90.196.91.202 has been vandalizing Template:2008–09 NBA Conference standings and Knowledge (XXG):Admin coaching/Requests for Coaching. Please block him.

2953: 2233:. It's fun! Please visit the project and wikify a few articles to help clear the backlog. If you can recruit some more participants, then even better. 1387: 1364: 2011: 1504:

Hmm. Still not quite sure with this one. I might have to abstain. However, depending on the strength of the nom, I might be convinced to support ;) —

2705: 2620: 1172: 873:

in the sentence. To change it to "differentiates clearer" is anything but clear and does not follow any English grammatical rule I am familiar with.

3087:

You have my sincere appreciation for this message. I look forward to continuing to move forward in improving this project together. Best regards -

2734:

If you think it's not a big deal, I can take it or leave it, but in the meantime i'll ask around to see if there's any problems with changing it.

318:

For instance, this week links to Square Enix Music Online were added by IP address 129.67.117.245 to eight separate pages, including the page for

1559:

to try my hand at dispute resolution. Also, would you think it'd be a good idea to put my name down for admin coaching, or is this not needed?

1218:

all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced.

2077: 916:

Thanks for supporting my successful Rfa! Hope to work with you more in the future! Your thoughtful comments were well-appreciated, I think.--

840: 3207:. The unsigned comments are very rude. Look at the unsigned commenter's talk page as well as there are discussions about this topic as well. 889:

Again, thanks for your message, and I would be glad to help you with any questions you have about using and contributing to Knowledge (XXG).

3568: 2690:

on this one, IMO, but it's your call. I think you are right, but somebody gave me a hard time about this a few days ago in another article.

2992:

At any rate, welcome to Knowledge (XXG). Please jump in and find something that interests you, and if you have any questions, let me know!

2348: 1662: 1065: 1016: 951: 454:

I'm not sure what you want looked at. If you think an editor is adding content inappropriately, you should contact that editor directly.

151:

as well...but are these reasons for CSD? (Some of the obvious problems were addressed to the author on the talk page as well, by others.)

4102:

in less than 24 hours if he so chooses. It is also my motive to emphasize to the user that the block is preventative and not punitive.

2302:

article is about Bernard Madoff, not about tax strategy. The edit I undid was off topic. If you disagree, the appropriate forum is the

2501: 2018: 4642:

Should I rescind the warning? This user did the things in question, afterall. However, I understand what you mean. What should I do?

3177: 1367:. "clueful candidate" was generous and appreciated. Please let me know on my talk page if you have any suggestions for me. - Dan 1085: 1395: 614: 1925:, and I'm not sure there is any reason to do so. If you feel you need to go away for some reason, you may be able to invoke the 4387:. I won't change it back in fear of a block but it's fairly obvious that he's just gone behind an IP and continuing his abuse. 3960:

No consensus is being challenged; it just isn't being developed in advance. ("Edit-revert-re-edit-re-revert" isn't consensus.)

3350:

Aw, what a lovely shade of blue that bluelink is! Thanks mate - with such a glowing recommendation, let's hope things go well.

2811: 923: 4517:

You're right; reverted myself. Figured since it was second in 5 minutes it would be OK. I'm leaving it alone for now. Thanks!

4742:

And of course this comment went slightly to the wrong place, it was supposed to go under my previous comment a few lines up.

4552: 4407: 2846:

Thanks for giving Syjytg guidance on the RfA process, I obviously need to be quicker in contacting users when delisting RfAs

628: 580: 3759: 3390:

Yes, it's all very positive so far. I've gone ahead and put that template on my userpage - it seems to fit in quite nicely!

1843:

is subjective, so we have to rely on sources that we can trust, with a reputation for fact-chcecking and neutral reporting.

3286:

I'd be pleased to, but if I'm the primary one to write it, it will need to wait until the weekend. Will that work for you?

2372: 4271:

other hand, have provided sufficient reasons for my case but like everything else, he ignores them and makes his changes.

438:. This makes a total of twenty pages in a week. Is there an admin that might possibly have time to take a look at this? 2907: 2390: 2017:

this user and am not sure where to turn for help. Please get involved and try to act as the voice of reason. Thank you.

1684: 4728:

Yep, I planned to do one revert and then watch if he simply created a new username but apparently you beat me to it :)

4564: 2061: 4223:

for details. (Whether or not "every classroom" is also committing copyright violation is quite beside the point here.)

2549:

in differentiating good faith from bad faith edits. It's commendable to note the difference and can avoid bad blood.

1555:

under my belt, a bit more new page patrolling (I notice there's a major backlog there), and perhaps popping down to

1490:, an incorrect db-nonsense tag that happened on November 24, but that's pretty minor. AFD contribution looks solid. 5037: 4986: 4449:. I placed what I think is a pretty stern warning on his user page right above your note. If we need to initiate a 4151: 1035:

your intentions. Perhaps you should avoid editing if you're "not really interested" in understanding our policies.

89: 38: 1836: 1338:

You have that right. But I appreciated yours very much, for what you said. And you can count on hearing from me!

423: 5029: 5024: 5012: 5007: 4547: 4402: 4207: 4152:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Syjytg_reported_by_User:Antti29

2782: 2763: 2739: 2695: 2652: 2632: 2610: 2592: 2577: 2554: 2545:

I saw that too, and regardless of the distinction, I hope you don't mind if I try to emulate you in terms of the

2288: 81: 76: 64: 59: 2342: 1657: 1069: 1020: 955: 760: 3744: 1486:

Agree with those above. I opposed the first RFA due to lack of experience; she has improved since. I did find

312: 1525:

I'm feeling silly and want to spell things or make a smily face. But I wouldn't make a smily face an admin.--

4169: 2758:

With all the news lately, this could shape up to be a great article once we put a little more meat into it.

124: 1953: 1911: 1903: 1061: 1012: 947: 675:

Apparently so did GraemeL. So I could be wrong then, but regardless the account should remain blocked. :-)

277:

first article" but you might just start with a section in an existing article. If I can help, let me know.

4944: 4032: 3429: 2022: 1260: 1221: 851: 608: 4453:

then we can do so. But we certainly don't just go around blocking users for openly disregarding the MOS.

3905: 2337: 1628:

wise to wait a month or so - the last RFA was a bit too recent. Maybe I could suggest the start of 2009?

880: 393: 2856: 2248: 2144: 1825: 1775: 839:

Again, I do not write any of this with malice, but rather to follow the Knowledge (XXG) stated goal to “

622: 255: 210: 4802: 3763: 3119: 3031: 2969:

P.S. I've seen the message via the change log and... I'll work on some more edits over the next months

2477: 2108: 1839:(in fact, the very first line) which is official site policy. Why would a reliable source print a lie? 1391: 986:. I appreciate your efforts to clean up the project; we're all here for the same reason. Thanks again! 971: 105: 1965: 1907: 1899: 4203: 2778: 2759: 2735: 2691: 2648: 2628: 2606: 2588: 2573: 2550: 2284: 1879: 1850: 1439: 693: 604: 4952:

Yep; I contacted several people because it seemed to warrant serious attention. Thanks for looking.

4695:. I know, I used a template for 3RR just this morning, but somehow I still think this is different. 4220: 2970: 98: 4885: 4674: 4432: 4384: 2974: 2817: 2509: 2329: 2303: 1650: 1514: 1256: 920: 618: 617:), who I had just blocked a few minutes earlier for vandalism. There could also be a connection to 4863:...would appreciate a pointer to any templates used for alerting the user and interested parties. 3470: 4567:

this needs to be directed to. I've declined unblock and I'm sure Anti is aware of the situation.

4175:

For future reference, take a look at the nightmare scenario of editing this article. You thought

1961: 1886: 680: 636: 577: 560: 443: 380: 330: 4810: 3478: 2366: 1840: 978:, I can see that you immediately understood why that information was a blatant violation of the 1184: 123:

OK, I'd agree based on the way I phrased the question. Perhaps instead of Amazon I should have

4937: 4897: 4747: 4733: 4623: 4598: 4392: 4358: 4279: 4110: 4065: 3425: 1495: 847: 772: 705: 647: 4692: 3660: 2643: 2066: 975: 967: 879:

consensus is a form of vandalism. Please make sure to remember that Knowledge (XXG) is about

397: 4313: 4295: 4159: 3727: 3648: 3634: 3619: 3597: 3557: 3396: 3356: 3313: 3273: 3264: 3226: 3212: 3157: 3076: 2905: 2851: 2486: 2456: 2413: 2266: 2244: 2140: 2097: 1821: 1771: 1747: 1727: 1706: 1584: 1565: 1372: 1215:

Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed,

488: 251: 206: 4834: 4450: 4446: 4442: 4231: 3990: 3812: 3803: 3499: 3176:

Also, when you are linking to many internal pages, you can make the link shorter this way:

3168: 2687: 2662: 2403: 2230: 2012:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#Final_Fantasy_Legend_name_translation_woes.2C_mk._II

1980: 1926: 1129: 1032: 982:

policy which must be strictly adhered to, and that I removed it because it was uncited and

979: 350: 148: 4995: 4961: 4917: 4872: 4845: 4822: 4781: 4704: 4656: 4576: 4526: 4505: 4483: 4462: 4333: 4250: 4132: 4088: 4018: 3969: 3917: 3876: 3833: 3672: 3580: 3532: 3516: 3489: 3447: 3378: 3338: 3295: 3245: 3189: 3149: 3131: 3096: 3001: 2946: 2939: 2925: 2881: 2830: 2717: 2674: 2529: 2437: 2315: 2219: 2164: 2120: 2073: 2041: 1992: 1938: 1875: 1844: 1807: 1637: 1608: 1457: 1435: 1419: 1326: 1314: 1276: 1141: 1098: 1044: 995: 898: 798: 740: 659: 507: 463: 427: 409: 362: 286: 233: 166: 47: 17: 4663: 3503: 3482: 2636: 1795: 1556: 2378: 183:

and I would probably opt out of the discussion if he did. Consensus is always better.

4184: 4040: 3998: 3937: 3894: 3851: 3791: 3040: 2805: 2505: 2299: 1624:

bounce some queries around if you have any. Ask first act second. I also think you are

1506: 1346: 1303: 917: 319: 104:

Hmm. Well, I wouldn't say that he really met the criteria for notability as listed in

3629:

pages which is tiring and time-consuming. What to do to stop him from evading blocks?

2704:

Why don't you work on the votes while I build the page? And, let's move discussion to

1922: 1791: 983: 927: 4176: 3779: 3767: 3474: 3027: 2215: 1526: 677: 633: 571: 439: 435: 431: 376: 326: 188: 131: 127: 113: 4893: 4743: 4729: 4619: 4617:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2008%E2%80%9309_NBA_season&action=history

4594: 4388: 4354: 4317: 4275: 3549: 3466: 1552: 1491: 768: 701: 134: 3932:

modes" and you will discern that templates were adapted as much as possible. FWiW

1399: 726:

Having said all that - again, the short answer applies: block if you see fit, I'm

1448:

I think the "Per Pedro" comments at RFA 1 would indicate where I sit on this....

4994:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4380: 4324:

for you and recommend you read your talk page (top to bottom!) very thoroughly.

4291: 4155: 3722: 3644: 3630: 3615: 3593: 3553: 3391: 3351: 3308: 3268: 3222: 3208: 3153: 3115: 3065: 2900: 2482: 2451: 2408: 2262: 2239: 2229:

Thanks again for your participation. I am currently concentrating my efforts on

2093: 1741: 1721: 1700: 1579: 1560: 1368: 1241: 1118: 483: 273: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4968: 4946: 4924: 4901: 4879: 4852: 4829: 4788: 4751: 4737: 4711: 4677: 4627: 4602: 4583: 4557: 4533: 4512: 4490: 4469: 4435: 4412: 4396: 4362: 4340: 4299: 4283: 4257: 4211: 4188: 4163: 4139: 4117: 4095: 4072: 4044: 4025: 4002: 3976: 3941: 3924: 3898: 3883: 3855: 3840: 3795: 3770: 3734: 3679: 3652: 3638: 3623: 3601: 3587: 3561: 3535: 3523: 3492: 3454: 3432: 3403: 3385: 3363: 3345: 3320: 3302: 3280: 3252: 3230: 3216: 3196: 3161: 3138: 3103: 3081: 3008: 2978: 2932: 2909: 2888: 2861: 2823: 2786: 2767: 2743: 2724: 2699: 2681: 2656: 2614: 2596: 2581: 2558: 2536: 2513: 2490: 2463: 2444: 2420: 2322: 2292: 2270: 2252: 2171: 2148: 2127: 2101: 2081: 2048: 2026: 1999: 1969: 1945: 1915: 1856: 1829: 1814: 1779: 1755: 1735: 1714: 1668: 1644: 1615: 1591: 1572: 1538: 1519: 1499: 1481: 1464: 1443: 1426: 1376: 1350: 1333: 1307: 1283: 1249: 1148: 1121: 1105: 1073: 1051: 1024: 1002: 959: 933: 905: 855: 805: 776: 747: 709: 684: 666: 640: 589: 514: 491: 470: 447: 416: 384: 369: 334: 293: 259: 240: 214: 192: 173: 117: 4955: 4911: 4866: 4839: 4816: 4775: 4698: 4650: 4570: 4520: 4499: 4477: 4456: 4327: 4244: 4126: 4082: 4012: 3963: 3911: 3870: 3827: 3694: 3666: 3592:

Yup, almost there. This only show the current cases. What about the archives?

3574: 3529: 3510: 3486: 3441: 3372: 3332: 3289: 3239: 3183: 3125: 3090: 2995: 2919: 2875: 2711: 2668: 2523: 2431: 2309: 2223: 2158: 2114: 2035: 1986: 1932: 1801: 1631: 1602: 1478: 1451: 1413: 1320: 1270: 1264: 1135: 1092: 1038: 989: 892: 792: 734: 653: 501: 457: 403: 356: 280: 227: 160: 4274:

Maybe it's because his case cannot be justified and he's just being an a**.

4180: 4036: 3994: 3933: 3890: 3847: 3787: 1683:

I have replied to your comments on my talk page. Thanks for dropping by. :)

1340: 1297: 4219:

We do not re-publish copyrighted material on this site, period. Please see

4474:

He just got blocked for 24hr's for 3RR. Frank - further reply on my talk.

3751: 1868: 756:

I agree AIV gets a lot of too-early reports, and there have been a lot of

4035:

article. I have gone as far as I can without invoking 3R concerns. FWiW

2238:

Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by

715:

Bottom line/short answer: I don't object. Go ahead and block if you wish.

184: 109: 2226:

for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board.

1200: 272:

I see two possibilities (there may be others as well): add a section to

4379:

An IP address (which to my great surprise resolves to Singapore, where

4123:

I'm indifferent; let's move along. (And thanks for the notification.)

4060:

gives his word to behave I will unblock him and hold him to his word.

2186: 529: 2242:

which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it.

3267:, would you say now would be a good time to turn that redlink blue? 3204: 603:

I was assuming that it was the same user (and thus a sockpuppet of)

3485:. Or am I mistaken? If you wish to reply I am watching this page. 3152:

and hopefully do something before he vandalizes wikipedia further?

2402:, can you do that delete and partial restore thing for the sake of 3980:

PS: you still haven't identified which citations contained errors.

3020: 1533: 3815:

discussion which might look like it would apply)...it looks like

4647:

template. (I'm not qualified to render such an opinion myself.)

4106: 1770:]. You're right. I wasn't thinking clearly. Revert if you want. 221: 3481:

was writen by himself is relevant, I would have thought, under

2298:

Editing of articles on Knowledge (XXG) is not about power. The

4973: 25: 4237:

In addition, you have surely seen by now that another editor

4105:

That being said, I recognize the traditional right of "first

3750: 3019: 2956:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2938: 1867: 1785:

Concerning a strange statement you made on a talk page......

1158: 865:. The operative grammar rule here is that the adverb phrase 2055:

Orphaned non-free image (File:Reverbnation150x120black.gif)

1473:

First time 'round, I opposed because policy experience was

3766:

by wishing you a Happy Saint Patrick’s Day! Sincerely, --

1835:

It's hardly a strange statement. It's a direct quote from

1798:. Your motivation to improve the project is most welcome. 3811:

bibliographic style in that article (again, avoiding any

3150:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Jessemon111

2384: 4798: 4794: 4770: 4616: 4309: 4238: 4227: 3816: 2984: 2546: 2476:

Hiya Frank. I added a question for you in the current

2426: 2396: 2360: 1976: 1487: 1406:(admins only), what do you think about me blue-linking 1403: 862: 396:; again, they'd have to be checked individually. I say 342: 220:

My pleasure. I did have a question about your edits to

2899:

for removing that trash from my talk page history! :)

2212:; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral. 3550:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Wheel_war/Examples

846:I now ask that you return my changes to the pages. 3904:We seem to have a difference of opinion as to what 1578:Oh, by the way Useight - I'm a dude, not a dame :) 4615:Needless to say I'm sure, but he's at it again... 3817:I'm the first one that actually put any citations 2796: 1889:}} to other's talk pages with a friendly message. 1792:Knowledge (XXG) is about verifiability, not truth 984:Knowledge (XXG) is about verifiability, not truth 3057:While I am not quite sure what's wrong with my “ 3052:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Requests for comment/Aitias 1794:. References are always useful, especially from 559:If you want to reply to this message please use 563:as watch listing about 150 pages is a bit messy 392:that external links were added in violation of 3043:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 2076:. For assistance on the image use policy, see 353:, which is the forum for reviewing deletions. 325:Please allow me to thank you for your time. 8: 2067:Knowledge (XXG)'s rules for non-free images 4401:I've already reverted and blocked the IP. 4234:. Mr. Madoff qualifies as a living person. 3989:confusing them. As to editing we are in a 3180:. (Edit this page to see the difference.) 524: 130:. I got 94 and 77 hits. Clearly we're not 3692: 3205:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Htrbrse 2184: 2078:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions 1363:Thanks for your careful consideration at 1198: 841:Knowledge (XXG):Be_bold_in_updating_pages 4179:was tough, get a gander over here. FWiW 3569:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration 2945:Hello, Frank. You have new messages at 4563:But at least he did atempt to use talk 2621:Confirmations of Barack Obama's Cabinet 4992:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1885:Spread peace and goodwill by adding {{ 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4383:is from) just reverted the change by 3643:Frank, can you please say something? 3118:and keep an eye out for some blatant 2065:, and indicated that it's used under 1699:I replied at my talk page. Regards, — 7: 3802:Don't worry, this isn't an issue of 3715: 2196:Thank you for your participation in 553:Thanks for your support in my RFA!! 422:Yes, the links were removed, citing 304:Deletion of Square Enix Music Online 4230:was inappropriate. Please remember 3203:Please look at sections 2 and 3 of 3059:characterization of our interaction 1768:Hi Frank. I left a note for you at 821:the solution to which I arrived. 3465:I merely used the admin recall of 3461:Re: Jae Bryson deletion discussion 3030:has smiled at you! Smiles promote 2665:, but what the heck. I'll fix it. 1863:Best wishes for the holiday season 1222: 24: 4239:independently said the same thing 3760:Knowledge (XXG):Kindness Campaign 2062:File:Reverbnation150x120black.gif 1923:not possible to delete an account 1082:complete no-no on Knowledge (XXG) 482:another block on that address. -- 4977: 3716: 3693: 3263:Good afternoon Frank. Regarding 2829: 2276:Bernard Madoff Recovery of Funds 2185: 1199: 528: 29: 4935:Looks like I was too late. :) – 3473:was Jae Bryson, in response to 2111:, as you may have seen by now. 2072:This is an automated notice by 1515: 1507: 1242: 1185: 1179: 1173: 1171: 535:Thank you for participating in 345:over three months ago, after a 1691:21:47, 13 December 2008 (UTC) 1527: 1209:The Mizu onna sango15 Barnstar 1: 3661:parameters that already exist 3321:09:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 3303:18:36, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 3281:15:52, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 3217:11:59, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 3197:15:59, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 3178:"Jessemon111's contributions" 3162:15:47, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 3139:21:46, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 3104:17:55, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 3082:17:19, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 3009:00:19, 21 February 2009 (UTC) 2979:23:34, 20 February 2009 (UTC) 2933:02:41, 19 February 2009 (UTC) 2910:02:35, 19 February 2009 (UTC) 2889:14:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 2862:13:35, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 2787:02:09, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 2615:21:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 2452: 2409: 1837:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability 1780:08:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC) 1756:21:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC) 1736:21:11, 18 December 2008 (UTC) 1715:20:28, 18 December 2008 (UTC) 1685: 1669:02:25, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1645:13:31, 10 December 2008 (UTC) 1616:13:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC) 1592:10:32, 10 December 2008 (UTC) 1573:10:30, 10 December 2008 (UTC) 1250:23:35, 30 November 2008 (UTC) 1149:22:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1122:22:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1106:19:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 1074:19:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 1052:16:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 1025:16:12, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 1003:15:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 960:15:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 934:19:57, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 906:20:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 856:20:28, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 806:19:54, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 777:19:35, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 748:18:03, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 710:17:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 539:, which recently passed with 3039:Smile at others by adding {{ 2857: 2852: 2824:08:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 2768:01:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 2744:20:27, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 2725:20:17, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 2700:20:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 2682:20:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 2657:20:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 2637:19:48, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 2597:19:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 2582:17:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 2559:19:27, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 2537:22:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 2514:21:44, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 2491:15:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 2464:22:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 2445:22:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 2421:22:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 2323:20:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 2293:20:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 2271:22:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 2253:22:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 2231:the Wikification WikiProject 2172:13:45, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 2149:23:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 2128:22:59, 12 January 2009 (UTC) 2102:22:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC) 1979:was a crystal-clear case of 1539:00:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC) 1534: 1520:22:22, 8 December 2008 (UTC) 1500:16:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC) 1482:13:31, 8 December 2008 (UTC) 1465:12:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC) 1444:11:50, 8 December 2008 (UTC) 1427:08:12, 8 December 2008 (UTC) 1377:00:39, 7 December 2008 (UTC) 1351:02:38, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 1334:01:26, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 1308:00:32, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 1284:00:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC) 685:21:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 667:21:07, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 641:21:05, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 590:23:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC) 534: 515:17:38, 5 November 2008 (UTC) 492:17:08, 5 November 2008 (UTC) 471:19:33, 3 November 2008 (UTC) 448:19:31, 3 November 2008 (UTC) 417:19:14, 1 November 2008 (UTC) 385:17:33, 1 November 2008 (UTC) 370:20:04, 31 October 2008 (UTC) 335:19:53, 31 October 2008 (UTC) 294:15:35, 3 November 2008 (UTC) 260:15:18, 3 November 2008 (UTC) 241:19:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 215:17:47, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 193:12:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC) 174:01:28, 3 November 2008 (UTC) 118:22:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC) 2642:Good job so far! One thing 2458: 2415: 2335:Regarding the vandalism by 2107:My opinions on this are at 2082:12:23, 7 January 2009 (UTC) 2049:16:29, 7 January 2009 (UTC) 2027:01:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC) 2010:Please see this discussion 2000:16:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 1970:16:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 1946:15:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 1916:15:18, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 1857:22:58, 3 January 2009 (UTC) 1830:14:37, 3 January 2009 (UTC) 1815:06:27, 3 January 2009 (UTC) 1080:"Original authorship" is a 980:biography of living persons 646:I got an email; apparently 5056: 4969:18:03, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4947:17:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4925:15:41, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4902:15:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4880:14:53, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 4853:13:36, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 4830:12:47, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 4789:12:42, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 4752:13:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 4738:13:17, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 4712:20:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 4678:20:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 4664:20:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 4628:14:24, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 4603:16:33, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 4584:13:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 4558:13:32, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 4534:13:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 4513:13:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 4491:13:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 4470:19:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 4436:19:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 4413:14:19, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 4397:14:10, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 4363:12:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 4341:16:04, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 4300:15:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 4284:15:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 4258:19:32, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 4212:18:57, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 4189:18:15, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 4164:14:42, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 4140:14:45, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 4118:14:39, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 4096:14:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 4073:13:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 4045:18:07, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 4026:17:57, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 4003:17:45, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 3977:16:54, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 3942:16:15, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 3925:14:38, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 3899:21:52, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 3884:20:10, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 3856:04:33, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 3841:20:55, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 3796:20:41, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 3771:15:56, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 3680:15:37, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 3050:Regarding your comment on 1649:I would support. Erik the 527: 311:I noticed the deletion of 3762:, we just want to spread 3735:14:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC) 3699: 3653:07:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC) 3639:18:39, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 3624:15:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 3602:15:31, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 3588:14:12, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 3562:11:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 3536:19:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC) 3524:14:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 3493:02:17, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 3455:20:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 3433:20:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 3404:16:19, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 3386:14:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 3364:11:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 3346:02:03, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 3253:14:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 3231:14:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 3114:Can you please watchlist 2827: 2799: 2304:talk page for the article 2214:Special thanks go out to 2191: 1790:Please keep in mind that 1205: 816:Cherokee Language Changes 4320:some advice, but I have 3764:Knowledge (XXG):WikiLove 3730:(bring on the trumpets!) 3477:question. The fact that 3399:(bring on the trumpets!) 3359:(bring on the trumpets!) 3316:(bring on the trumpets!) 3307:Yep, that's fine by me. 3276:(bring on the trumpets!) 2802:passed today at 150/48/6 1434:I responded via e-mail. 313:Square Enix Music Online 4637: 4170:Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-15 4033:Manfred von Richthofen‎ 3221:Have you looked at it? 3148:Can you take a look at 2686:Nah, you should invoke 2619: 912:Thanks for the support! 4310:replied in detail here 4031:forte, I hear) in the 3755: 3024: 2943: 2496:Sr/jr. distinction out 1872: 1764:Cloward-Piven Strategy 1382:Attention RfA regulars 1165: 869:is modifying the verb 4990:of past discussions. 4771:Good morning folks... 3754: 3709:I'm very glad to say 3023: 2942: 1954:Visionaire (software) 1882:) wishes you peace! 1871: 1551:like perhaps getting 1313:You're talking about 1162: 966:Thanks for finding a 42:of past discussions. 4548:Deacon of Pndapetzim 4403:Deacon of Pndapetzim 4055:SoulBrotherNumberOne 3703:The Special Barnstar 3686:I passed! Thank you! 2773:Come And Take A Look 2706:the page's talk page 2500:Please, look at the 2200:, which failed with 1977:deletion in question 1086:no original research 4447:assuming good faith 4385:User:Richard Rundle 3745:Saint Patrick’s Day 2330:Timothy F. Geithner 1981:blatant advertising 347:deletion discussion 4942: 4316:). I already gave 3756: 3025: 2954:remove this notice 2944: 2839: 2834: 1873: 1695:RE: Recent actions 1343: 1300: 1191: 1166: 201:Thanks for Welcome 5043: 5042: 5002: 5001: 4996:current talk page 4967: 4936: 4923: 4878: 4851: 4828: 4787: 4710: 4662: 4582: 4555: 4532: 4511: 4489: 4468: 4410: 4339: 4256: 4138: 4094: 4024: 3987: 3981: 3975: 3923: 3882: 3839: 3758:On behalf of the 3740: 3739: 3731: 3678: 3586: 3567:Perhaps you mean 3522: 3453: 3438:My pleasure. :-) 3400: 3384: 3360: 3344: 3317: 3301: 3277: 3259:Revisit revisited 3251: 3195: 3137: 3102: 3072: 3045: 3007: 2947:Mazca's talk page 2931: 2887: 2872:to it! Cheers... 2838: 2837: 2828: 2795: 2723: 2680: 2535: 2443: 2321: 2260: 2259: 2243: 2170: 2126: 2047: 1998: 1944: 1927:"right to vanish" 1813: 1667: 1643: 1614: 1588: 1569: 1463: 1425: 1365:my successful RfA 1349: 1339: 1332: 1306: 1296: 1282: 1230: 1229: 1223:Mizu onna sango15 1190: 1169: 1168: 1147: 1104: 1084:. Please see the 1064:comment added by 1050: 1015:comment added by 1001: 950:comment added by 904: 804: 746: 665: 648:User:Ohnoitsjamie 596: 595: 585: 564: 513: 469: 415: 368: 292: 239: 172: 95: 94: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5047: 5021: 5004: 5003: 4981: 4980: 4974: 4966: 4964: 4958: 4953: 4940: 4922: 4920: 4914: 4909: 4877: 4875: 4869: 4864: 4850: 4848: 4837: 4827: 4825: 4819: 4814: 4786: 4784: 4778: 4773: 4709: 4707: 4701: 4696: 4661: 4659: 4653: 4648: 4638:Syjytg's Warning 4581: 4579: 4568: 4551: 4531: 4529: 4523: 4518: 4510: 4508: 4497: 4488: 4486: 4475: 4467: 4465: 4459: 4454: 4406: 4338: 4336: 4330: 4325: 4255: 4253: 4247: 4242: 4150:Can you look at 4137: 4135: 4129: 4124: 4115: 4093: 4091: 4085: 4080: 4070: 4023: 4021: 4015: 4010: 3985: 3979: 3974: 3972: 3966: 3961: 3922: 3920: 3914: 3909: 3881: 3879: 3873: 3868: 3838: 3836: 3830: 3825: 3732: 3729: 3725: 3721: 3720: 3719: 3697: 3690: 3689: 3677: 3675: 3669: 3664: 3585: 3583: 3577: 3572: 3521: 3519: 3513: 3508: 3452: 3450: 3444: 3439: 3401: 3398: 3394: 3383: 3381: 3375: 3370: 3361: 3358: 3354: 3343: 3341: 3335: 3330: 3318: 3315: 3311: 3300: 3298: 3292: 3287: 3278: 3275: 3271: 3250: 3248: 3242: 3237: 3194: 3192: 3186: 3181: 3136: 3134: 3128: 3123: 3101: 3099: 3093: 3088: 3075: 3070: 3068: 3062: 3037: 3006: 3004: 2998: 2993: 2957: 2930: 2928: 2922: 2917: 2903: 2886: 2884: 2878: 2873: 2858: 2854: 2849: 2833: 2820: 2814: 2808: 2797: 2722: 2720: 2714: 2709: 2679: 2677: 2671: 2666: 2534: 2532: 2526: 2521: 2459: 2454: 2442: 2440: 2434: 2429: 2416: 2411: 2401: 2400: 2355:deleted contribs 2320: 2318: 2312: 2307: 2237: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2189: 2182: 2181: 2169: 2167: 2161: 2156: 2125: 2123: 2117: 2112: 2059:You've uploaded 2046: 2044: 2038: 2033: 1997: 1995: 1989: 1984: 1943: 1941: 1935: 1930: 1853: 1847: 1812: 1810: 1804: 1799: 1796:reliable sources 1720:Replied again. — 1689: 1665: 1660: 1656: 1653: 1642: 1640: 1629: 1613: 1611: 1605: 1600: 1589: 1586: 1582: 1570: 1567: 1563: 1536: 1531: 1517: 1511: 1462: 1460: 1449: 1424: 1422: 1416: 1411: 1345: 1331: 1329: 1323: 1318: 1302: 1281: 1279: 1273: 1268: 1255:Maybe you could 1246: 1224: 1203: 1196: 1195: 1189: 1187: 1181: 1175: 1170: 1167: 1146: 1144: 1138: 1133: 1103: 1101: 1095: 1090: 1076: 1049: 1047: 1041: 1036: 1027: 1000: 998: 992: 987: 976:the five pillars 962: 903: 901: 895: 890: 803: 801: 795: 790: 765: 759: 745: 743: 737: 732: 683: 664: 662: 656: 651: 639: 588: 583: 574: 558: 545:22 in opposition 532: 525: 512: 510: 504: 499: 486: 468: 466: 460: 455: 424:WP:NOTREPOSITORY 414: 412: 406: 401: 367: 365: 359: 354: 291: 289: 283: 278: 238: 236: 230: 225: 171: 169: 163: 158: 73: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5055: 5054: 5050: 5049: 5048: 5046: 5045: 5044: 5017: 4978: 4962: 4956: 4954: 4938: 4933: 4918: 4912: 4910: 4889: 4873: 4867: 4865: 4846: 4838: 4823: 4817: 4815: 4799:the first block 4795:Created 5 March 4782: 4776: 4774: 4768: 4705: 4699: 4697: 4657: 4651: 4649: 4640: 4577: 4569: 4527: 4521: 4519: 4506: 4498: 4484: 4476: 4463: 4457: 4455: 4429: 4334: 4328: 4326: 4322:far more advice 4308:Syjytg, I have 4268: 4251: 4245: 4243: 4204:Furtive admirer 4197: 4173: 4148: 4133: 4127: 4125: 4111: 4089: 4083: 4081: 4066: 4057: 4019: 4013: 4011: 3970: 3964: 3962: 3918: 3912: 3910: 3877: 3871: 3869: 3834: 3828: 3826: 3783: 3749: 3728: 3723: 3717: 3688: 3673: 3667: 3665: 3612: 3581: 3575: 3573: 3546: 3517: 3511: 3509: 3463: 3448: 3442: 3440: 3422: 3397: 3392: 3379: 3373: 3371: 3357: 3352: 3339: 3333: 3331: 3314: 3309: 3296: 3290: 3288: 3274: 3269: 3261: 3246: 3240: 3238: 3190: 3184: 3182: 3146: 3132: 3126: 3124: 3112: 3097: 3091: 3089: 3073: 3066: 3064: 3055: 3047: 3017: 3002: 2996: 2994: 2963: 2958: 2951: 2926: 2920: 2918: 2901: 2897: 2882: 2876: 2874: 2847: 2844: 2818: 2812: 2806: 2794: 2779:Spinach Monster 2775: 2760:Spinach Monster 2756: 2736:Spinach Monster 2718: 2712: 2710: 2692:Spinach Monster 2675: 2669: 2667: 2661:I could invoke 2649:Spinach Monster 2629:Spinach Monster 2624: 2607:Furtive admirer 2589:Furtive admirer 2574:Furtive admirer 2569: 2551:Spinach Monster 2530: 2524: 2522: 2498: 2474: 2438: 2432: 2430: 2340: 2336: 2333: 2316: 2310: 2308: 2285:Furtive admirer 2278: 2256: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2180: 2165: 2159: 2157: 2136: 2121: 2115: 2113: 2089: 2057: 2042: 2036: 2034: 2008: 1993: 1987: 1985: 1957: 1939: 1933: 1931: 1895: 1890: 1887:subst:WikiPeace 1865: 1851: 1845: 1808: 1802: 1800: 1787: 1766: 1697: 1681: 1663: 1658: 1651: 1638: 1630: 1609: 1603: 1601: 1585: 1580: 1566: 1561: 1458: 1450: 1420: 1414: 1412: 1384: 1361: 1327: 1321: 1319: 1315:ancient history 1292: 1277: 1271: 1269: 1238: 1157: 1142: 1136: 1134: 1114: 1099: 1093: 1091: 1059: 1045: 1039: 1037: 1010: 996: 990: 988: 945: 941: 914: 899: 893: 891: 818: 799: 793: 791: 763: 761:uw-vandalism4im 757: 741: 735: 733: 697: 694:User:CAR Online 676: 660: 654: 652: 632: 601: 586: 572: 569: 549:6 neutral votes 523: 508: 502: 500: 484: 479: 464: 458: 456: 428:Hirokazu Tanaka 410: 404: 402: 363: 357: 355: 351:deletion review 306: 287: 281: 279: 234: 228: 226: 203: 167: 161: 159: 102: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 18:User talk:Frank 12: 11: 5: 5053: 5051: 5041: 5040: 5035: 5032: 5027: 5022: 5015: 5010: 5000: 4999: 4982: 4972: 4971: 4932: 4929: 4928: 4927: 4888: 4883: 4858: 4857: 4856: 4855: 4807: 4806: 4767: 4764: 4763: 4762: 4761: 4760: 4759: 4758: 4757: 4756: 4755: 4754: 4719: 4718: 4717: 4716: 4715: 4714: 4683: 4682: 4681: 4680: 4675:Arbiteroftruth 4667: 4666: 4639: 4636: 4635: 4634: 4633: 4632: 4631: 4630: 4608: 4607: 4606: 4605: 4587: 4586: 4565:which is where 4543: 4542: 4541: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4537: 4536: 4433:Arbiteroftruth 4428: 4425: 4424: 4423: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4418: 4417: 4416: 4415: 4370: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4366: 4365: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4343: 4303: 4302: 4267: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4261: 4260: 4235: 4224: 4196: 4193: 4172: 4167: 4147: 4144: 4143: 4142: 4099: 4098: 4056: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4047: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3954: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3782: 3777: 3775: 3748: 3741: 3738: 3737: 3706: 3705: 3700: 3698: 3687: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3611: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3545: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3469:as proof that 3462: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3421: 3418: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3260: 3257: 3256: 3255: 3202: 3200: 3199: 3173: 3172: 3145: 3142: 3111: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3054: 3048: 3036: 3018: 3016: 3013: 3012: 3011: 2989: 2988: 2962: 2959: 2950: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2896: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2860: 2843: 2842:Syjytg and RfA 2840: 2836: 2835: 2826: 2793: 2790: 2774: 2771: 2755: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2623: 2618: 2601: 2568: 2567:Bernard Madoff 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2540: 2539: 2497: 2494: 2473: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2338:75.249.224.138 2332: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2300:Bernard Madoff 2277: 2274: 2258: 2257: 2235: 2193: 2192: 2190: 2179: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2135: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2088: 2087:Joke questions 2085: 2056: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2007: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1956: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1894: 1891: 1883: 1866: 1864: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1818: 1817: 1786: 1783: 1765: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1696: 1693: 1680: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1595: 1594: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1390:, considering 1383: 1380: 1360: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1291: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1240:Yes, very :P 1237: 1234: 1232: 1228: 1227: 1219: 1216: 1212: 1211: 1206: 1204: 1193: 1156: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1113: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1066:86.129.127.155 1055: 1054: 1031:Oh, I guess I 1017:86.129.127.155 1006: 1005: 952:86.129.127.155 940: 937: 913: 910: 909: 908: 886: 885: 875: 874: 871:differentiates 817: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 782: 781: 780: 779: 751: 750: 723: 722: 717: 716: 696: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 670: 669: 600: 597: 594: 593: 581: 568: 554: 541:126 in support 533: 522: 519: 518: 517: 478: 475: 474: 473: 420: 419: 373: 372: 341:That page was 305: 302: 301: 300: 299: 298: 297: 296: 265: 264: 263: 262: 244: 243: 202: 199: 198: 197: 196: 195: 177: 176: 153: 152: 143: 142: 101: 99:Chuck Hustmyre 96: 93: 92: 87: 84: 79: 74: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5052: 5039: 5036: 5033: 5031: 5028: 5026: 5023: 5020: 5016: 5014: 5011: 5009: 5006: 5005: 4997: 4993: 4989: 4988: 4983: 4976: 4975: 4970: 4965: 4959: 4951: 4950: 4949: 4948: 4945: 4941: 4930: 4926: 4921: 4915: 4906: 4905: 4904: 4903: 4899: 4895: 4887: 4886:User:Mitchcoe 4884: 4882: 4881: 4876: 4870: 4862: 4854: 4849: 4843: 4842: 4836: 4833: 4832: 4831: 4826: 4820: 4812: 4809: 4808: 4804: 4801:, but unused 4800: 4796: 4793: 4792: 4791: 4790: 4785: 4779: 4772: 4765: 4753: 4749: 4745: 4741: 4740: 4739: 4735: 4731: 4727: 4726: 4725: 4724: 4723: 4722: 4721: 4720: 4713: 4708: 4702: 4694: 4689: 4688: 4687: 4686: 4685: 4684: 4679: 4676: 4671: 4670: 4669: 4668: 4665: 4660: 4654: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4629: 4625: 4621: 4618: 4614: 4613: 4612: 4611: 4610: 4609: 4604: 4600: 4596: 4591: 4590: 4589: 4588: 4585: 4580: 4574: 4573: 4566: 4562: 4561: 4560: 4559: 4554: 4549: 4535: 4530: 4524: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4509: 4503: 4502: 4494: 4493: 4492: 4487: 4481: 4480: 4473: 4472: 4471: 4466: 4460: 4452: 4448: 4444: 4441:I think that 4440: 4439: 4438: 4437: 4434: 4426: 4414: 4409: 4404: 4400: 4399: 4398: 4394: 4390: 4386: 4382: 4378: 4377: 4376: 4375: 4374: 4373: 4372: 4371: 4364: 4360: 4356: 4352: 4351: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4342: 4337: 4331: 4323: 4319: 4315: 4311: 4307: 4306: 4305: 4304: 4301: 4297: 4293: 4288: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4281: 4277: 4272: 4265: 4259: 4254: 4248: 4240: 4236: 4233: 4229: 4225: 4222: 4218: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4213: 4209: 4205: 4201: 4194: 4192: 4190: 4186: 4182: 4178: 4177:Leroy Grumman 4171: 4168: 4166: 4165: 4161: 4157: 4153: 4145: 4141: 4136: 4130: 4122: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4116: 4114: 4108: 4103: 4097: 4092: 4086: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4074: 4071: 4069: 4061: 4054: 4046: 4042: 4038: 4034: 4029: 4028: 4027: 4022: 4016: 4007: 4006: 4004: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3984: 3983: 3982: 3978: 3973: 3967: 3943: 3939: 3935: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3921: 3915: 3907: 3903: 3902: 3900: 3896: 3892: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3880: 3874: 3865: 3860: 3859: 3857: 3853: 3849: 3844: 3843: 3842: 3837: 3831: 3823: 3818: 3814: 3809: 3805: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3797: 3793: 3789: 3781: 3780:Leroy Grumman 3778: 3776: 3773: 3772: 3769: 3765: 3761: 3753: 3746: 3742: 3736: 3733: 3726: 3712: 3708: 3707: 3704: 3701: 3696: 3691: 3685: 3681: 3676: 3670: 3662: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3654: 3650: 3646: 3641: 3640: 3636: 3632: 3626: 3625: 3621: 3617: 3609: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3584: 3578: 3570: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3559: 3555: 3551: 3544:Viewing cases 3543: 3537: 3534: 3531: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3520: 3514: 3505: 3501: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3491: 3488: 3484: 3480: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3460: 3456: 3451: 3445: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3431: 3427: 3419: 3405: 3402: 3395: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3382: 3376: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3362: 3355: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3342: 3336: 3328: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3319: 3312: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3299: 3293: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3279: 3272: 3266: 3258: 3254: 3249: 3243: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3228: 3224: 3219: 3218: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3198: 3193: 3187: 3179: 3175: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3143: 3141: 3140: 3135: 3129: 3121: 3117: 3110:Any stalkers? 3109: 3105: 3100: 3094: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3080: 3079: 3071: 3069: 3060: 3053: 3049: 3046: 3044: 3042: 3033: 3029: 3022: 3014: 3010: 3005: 2999: 2991: 2990: 2986: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2967: 2960: 2955: 2948: 2941: 2934: 2929: 2923: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2908: 2906: 2904: 2894: 2890: 2885: 2879: 2871: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2850: 2841: 2832: 2825: 2821: 2815: 2809: 2803: 2798: 2791: 2789: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2772: 2770: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2753: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2730: 2726: 2721: 2715: 2707: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2678: 2672: 2664: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2645: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2622: 2617: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2599: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2584: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2566: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2538: 2533: 2527: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2495: 2493: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2479: 2471: 2465: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2455: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2441: 2435: 2428: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2412: 2405: 2398: 2395: 2392: 2389: 2386: 2383: 2380: 2377: 2374: 2371: 2368: 2365: 2362: 2359: 2356: 2353: 2350: 2347: 2344: 2339: 2331: 2328: 2324: 2319: 2313: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2275: 2273: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2255: 2254: 2250: 2246: 2241: 2234: 2232: 2227: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2199: 2198:my recent RfA 2195: 2194: 2188: 2183: 2178:RfA thankspam 2177: 2173: 2168: 2162: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2133: 2129: 2124: 2118: 2110: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2086: 2084: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2070: 2068: 2064: 2063: 2054: 2050: 2045: 2039: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2014: 2013: 2005: 2001: 1996: 1990: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1942: 1936: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1893:My recent RfA 1892: 1888: 1884: 1881: 1877: 1870: 1862: 1858: 1855: 1854: 1848: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1816: 1811: 1805: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1788: 1784: 1782: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1763: 1757: 1754: 1751: 1750: 1746: 1743: 1740:Once again. — 1739: 1738: 1737: 1734: 1731: 1730: 1726: 1723: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1713: 1710: 1709: 1705: 1702: 1694: 1692: 1690: 1688: 1678: 1670: 1666: 1661: 1654: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1641: 1635: 1634: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1612: 1606: 1597: 1596: 1593: 1590: 1583: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1571: 1564: 1558: 1554: 1540: 1537: 1532: 1530: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1518: 1513: 1512: 1510: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1466: 1461: 1455: 1454: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1423: 1417: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1381: 1379: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1358: 1352: 1348: 1342: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1330: 1324: 1316: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1305: 1299: 1289: 1285: 1280: 1274: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1247: 1245: 1235: 1233: 1226: 1225: 1214: 1213: 1210: 1207: 1202: 1197: 1194: 1188: 1182: 1176: 1161: 1154: 1150: 1145: 1139: 1131: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1120: 1111: 1107: 1102: 1096: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1053: 1048: 1042: 1034: 1033:misunderstood 1030: 1029: 1028: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1004: 999: 993: 985: 981: 977: 973: 969: 965: 964: 963: 961: 957: 953: 949: 939:Robert Conrad 938: 936: 935: 932: 931: 930: 929:the Orphanage 925: 922: 919: 911: 907: 902: 896: 888: 887: 882: 877: 876: 872: 868: 864: 860: 859: 858: 857: 853: 849: 844: 842: 837: 833: 829: 826: 822: 815: 807: 802: 796: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 778: 774: 770: 762: 755: 754: 753: 752: 749: 744: 738: 729: 725: 724: 719: 718: 714: 713: 712: 711: 707: 703: 695: 692: 686: 682: 679: 674: 673: 672: 671: 668: 663: 657: 649: 645: 644: 643: 642: 638: 635: 630: 627: 624: 620: 616: 613: 610: 606: 598: 592: 591: 587: 578: 576: 575: 567: 562: 557: 550: 546: 542: 538: 531: 526: 520: 516: 511: 505: 496: 495: 494: 493: 490: 487: 476: 472: 467: 461: 453: 452: 451: 449: 445: 441: 437: 436:Manabu Namiki 433: 432:Akira Yamaoka 429: 425: 418: 413: 407: 399: 395: 390: 389: 388: 386: 382: 378: 371: 366: 360: 352: 348: 344: 340: 339: 338: 336: 332: 328: 323: 321: 316: 314: 309: 303: 295: 290: 284: 275: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 266: 261: 257: 253: 248: 247: 246: 245: 242: 237: 231: 223: 219: 218: 217: 216: 212: 208: 200: 194: 190: 186: 181: 180: 179: 178: 175: 170: 164: 155: 154: 150: 145: 144: 141:appear to be. 140: 136: 133: 132:talking about 129: 126: 122: 121: 120: 119: 115: 111: 107: 100: 97: 91: 88: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 72: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5018: 4991: 4985: 4939:Juliancolton 4934: 4890: 4859: 4840: 4811:Quack, quack 4769: 4641: 4571: 4544: 4500: 4478: 4430: 4321: 4273: 4269: 4228:edit summary 4202: 4198: 4174: 4149: 4112: 4104: 4100: 4067: 4062: 4058: 3959: 3906:WP:CONSENSUS 3863: 3821: 3807: 3784: 3774: 3757: 3702: 3642: 3627: 3613: 3548:I have seen 3547: 3467:User:MBisanz 3464: 3426:Slrubenstein 3423: 3262: 3220: 3201: 3147: 3113: 3077: 3063: 3058: 3056: 3038: 3026: 2968: 2964: 2898: 2869: 2845: 2776: 2757: 2625: 2605: 2600: 2585: 2570: 2547:Edit Summary 2499: 2487:send/receive 2475: 2457: 2450: 2414: 2407: 2393: 2387: 2381: 2375: 2369: 2363: 2357: 2351: 2345: 2334: 2283: 2279: 2261: 2236: 2228: 2213: 2137: 2098:send/receive 2090: 2071: 2060: 2058: 2019:74.242.123.2 2015: 2009: 1958: 1952:Deletion of 1896: 1874: 1849: 1819: 1767: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1698: 1686: 1682: 1679:I replied... 1632: 1625: 1621: 1549: 1528: 1508: 1505: 1474: 1452: 1385: 1373:send/receive 1362: 1293: 1290:Meanwhile... 1267:for me. :-) 1243: 1239: 1231: 1217: 1208: 1192: 1183:| Design by 1174:The Barnstar 1115: 1081: 1056: 1007: 942: 928: 926: 915: 870: 867:more clearly 866: 848:Shawnbgreene 845: 838: 834: 830: 827: 823: 819: 727: 698: 625: 611: 602: 570: 565: 561:my talk page 555: 552: 548: 544: 540: 480: 421: 394:WP:PROMOTION 374: 324: 317: 310: 307: 204: 138: 135:John Grisham 103: 70: 43: 37: 4984:This is an 4861:Case opened 4803:until today 4381:User:Syjytg 3986:all of them 3528:Ok, thanks 3327:take a look 3120:WP:MEMORIAL 3116:LeRoi Moore 3041:subst:Smile 2449:Thanks! :) 2245:Itsmejudith 2141:Itsmejudith 1908:John-joe123 1900:John-joe123 1822:Dr CareBear 1772:Syntacticus 1687:NoSeptember 1553:my first GA 1186:L'Aquatique 1060:—Preceding 1011:—Preceding 946:—Preceding 274:ceramic art 252:Aclayartist 207:Aclayartist 106:WP:CREATIVE 36:This is an 5038:Archive 10 4266:My dispute 4221:WP:COPYVIO 3479:Jae Bryson 3475:Dravecky's 3078:discussion 2961:RE: My RfA 2754:Good Work! 2391:block user 2361:filter log 2220:Dougweller 2074:FairuseBot 1876:Ecoleetage 1749:discussion 1729:discussion 1708:discussion 1436:Ecoleetage 1386:Regarding 1236:RE: Bored? 605:Verystages 573:·Add§hore· 521:RfA thanks 308:Hi Frank, 90:Archive 10 5030:Archive 5 5025:Archive 4 5019:Archive 3 5013:Archive 2 5008:Archive 1 4797:, during 4314:talk page 3420:Pharisees 2971:Doggie015 2807:rootology 2792:thank you 2506:Cassandro 2502:talk page 2397:block log 1261:next week 1155:Thank you 918:Aervanath 881:consensus 863:your edit 450:Jeriaska 398:go for it 387:Jeriaska 337:Jeriaska 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 71:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 3822:existing 3768:A Nobody 3498:Neither 3424:Thanks! 3032:WikiLove 3028:A Nobody 2952:You can 2349:contribs 2216:Moreschi 2139:wishes. 1388:this RfA 1112:Geithner 1062:unsigned 1013:unsigned 972:policies 968:citation 948:unsigned 884:article. 629:contribs 619:Metabane 615:contribs 477:Rollback 440:Jeriaska 377:Jeriaska 327:Jeriaska 320:Kō Ōtani 128:Worldcat 4987:archive 4931:Re: MfD 4894:Smartse 4744:Antti29 4730:Antti29 4693:WP:DTTR 4620:Antti29 4595:Antti29 4389:Antti29 4355:Antti29 4318:Antti29 4276:Antti29 4113:Chillum 4068:Chillum 3824:style. 3804:passion 3471:Brrryce 2895:thanks! 2853:Richard 2800:My RFA 2644:WP:HEAD 1841:"Truth" 1587:(rawr!) 1568:(rawr!) 1492:Useight 1265:my life 1164:sango15 769:barneca 728:totally 702:barneca 343:deleted 125:checked 39:archive 4957:Frank 4913:Frank 4868:Frank 4835:WP:SSP 4818:Frank 4777:Frank 4700:Frank 4652:Frank 4522:Frank 4458:Frank 4451:WP:RFC 4443:WP:BAN 4427:Syjytg 4329:Frank 4312:(your 4292:Syjytg 4246:Frank 4232:WP:BLP 4195:madoff 4156:Syjytg 4128:Frank 4084:Frank 4014:Frank 3991:WP:BRD 3965:Frank 3913:Frank 3872:Frank 3829:Frank 3813:WP:OWN 3743:Happy 3724:Bettia 3711:my RfA 3668:Frank 3645:Syjytg 3631:Syjytg 3616:Syjytg 3594:Syjytg 3576:Frank 3554:Syjytg 3533:Pyfan! 3512:Frank 3500:WP:COI 3490:Pyfan! 3443:Frank 3393:Bettia 3374:Frank 3353:Bettia 3334:Frank 3310:Bettia 3291:Frank 3270:Bettia 3241:Frank 3223:Syjytg 3209:Syjytg 3185:Frank 3169:WP:AIV 3154:Syjytg 3127:Frank 3092:Frank 3067:Aitias 3015:Smile! 2997:Frank 2921:Frank 2902:Thingg 2877:Frank 2713:Frank 2688:WP:IAR 2670:Frank 2663:WP:IAR 2525:Frank 2483:Dank55 2478:WT:RFA 2433:Frank 2404:WP:BLP 2311:Frank 2263:Denbot 2160:Frank 2134:My RfA 2116:Frank 2109:WT:RFA 2094:Dank55 2037:Frank 1988:Frank 1962:Shodan 1934:Frank 1921:It is 1803:Frank 1742:αἰτίας 1722:αἰτίας 1701:αἰτίας 1604:Frank 1581:Bettia 1562:Bettia 1415:Frank 1402:, and 1369:Dank55 1359:Thanks 1322:Frank 1272:Frank 1244:Garden 1180:My RFA 1137:Frank 1130:policy 1119:Tocino 1094:Frank 1040:Frank 991:Frank 894:Frank 794:Frank 736:Frank 655:Frank 537:my RfA 503:Frank 485:Zigger 459:Frank 405:Frank 358:Frank 282:Frank 229:Frank 162:Frank 149:WP:COI 4963:talk 4919:talk 4874:talk 4847:Chat 4841:Pedro 4824:talk 4783:talk 4766:Quack 4706:talk 4658:talk 4578:Chat 4572:Pedro 4528:talk 4507:Chat 4501:Pedro 4485:Chat 4479:Pedro 4464:talk 4335:talk 4252:talk 4226:Your 4134:talk 4090:talk 4020:talk 3971:talk 3919:talk 3878:talk 3835:talk 3674:talk 3582:talk 3518:talk 3504:WP:AB 3483:WP:AB 3449:talk 3380:talk 3340:talk 3297:talk 3247:talk 3191:talk 3133:talk 3098:talk 3003:talk 2927:talk 2883:talk 2732:Done. 2719:talk 2676:talk 2531:talk 2439:talk 2427:Done. 2367:WHOIS 2317:talk 2240:a bot 2224:Frank 2166:talk 2122:talk 2043:talk 2006:Help! 1994:talk 1940:talk 1852:Cobra 1846:Glass 1809:talk 1639:Chat 1633:Pedro 1610:talk 1557:WP:3O 1479:Coren 1459:Chat 1453:Pedro 1421:talk 1328:talk 1278:talk 1257:cover 1143:talk 1100:talk 1046:talk 997:talk 921:lives 900:talk 800:talk 742:talk 661:talk 599:Reply 509:talk 465:talk 411:talk 364:talk 288:talk 235:talk 168:talk 16:< 4898:talk 4813:... 4748:talk 4734:talk 4624:talk 4599:talk 4553:Talk 4408:Talk 4393:talk 4359:talk 4296:talk 4280:talk 4208:talk 4185:talk 4181:Bzuk 4160:talk 4107:dibs 4041:talk 4037:Bzuk 3999:talk 3995:Bzuk 3938:talk 3934:Bzuk 3895:talk 3891:Bzuk 3852:talk 3848:Bzuk 3808:some 3792:talk 3788:Bzuk 3649:talk 3635:talk 3620:talk 3610:Help 3598:talk 3558:talk 3502:nor 3430:Talk 3325:OK, 3265:this 3227:talk 3213:talk 3158:talk 2985:Done 2975:talk 2783:talk 2764:talk 2740:talk 2696:talk 2653:talk 2633:talk 2611:talk 2593:talk 2578:talk 2555:talk 2510:talk 2453:Grsz 2410:Grsz 2385:http 2379:RBLs 2373:RDNS 2343:talk 2289:talk 2267:talk 2249:talk 2222:and 2145:talk 2023:talk 1975:The 1966:talk 1912:talk 1904:talk 1880:talk 1826:talk 1776:talk 1626:very 1529:Koji 1516:eran 1496:talk 1488:this 1475:just 1440:talk 1408:this 1404:this 1400:this 1396:this 1392:this 1347:talk 1341:Tvoz 1304:talk 1298:Tvoz 1259:the 1070:talk 1021:talk 974:and 956:talk 852:talk 773:talk 706:talk 681:khoi 678:Khoi 637:khoi 634:Khoi 623:talk 609:talk 547:and 444:talk 434:and 381:talk 331:talk 256:talk 222:Mark 211:talk 189:talk 114:talk 3530:Oli 3487:Oli 3428:| 2472:RFA 2251:), 1652:Red 1263:of 631:). 584:ont 489:«º» 185:Deb 139:not 110:Deb 5034:→ 4960:| 4943:| 4916:| 4900:) 4871:| 4844:: 4821:| 4780:| 4750:) 4736:) 4703:| 4655:| 4626:) 4601:) 4575:: 4556:) 4525:| 4504:: 4482:: 4461:| 4411:) 4395:) 4361:) 4332:| 4298:) 4282:) 4249:| 4241:. 4210:) 4191:. 4187:) 4162:) 4154:? 4146:Hi 4131:| 4087:| 4043:) 4017:| 4005:. 4001:) 3968:| 3940:) 3916:| 3901:. 3897:) 3875:| 3864:no 3858:. 3854:) 3832:| 3798:. 3794:) 3671:| 3663:. 3651:) 3637:) 3622:) 3600:) 3579:| 3560:) 3515:| 3446:| 3377:| 3337:| 3329:! 3294:| 3244:| 3229:) 3215:) 3188:| 3160:) 3144:Hi 3130:| 3095:| 3074:// 3000:| 2977:) 2924:| 2880:| 2870:me 2848::P 2822:) 2816:)( 2785:) 2766:) 2742:) 2716:| 2708:. 2698:) 2673:| 2655:) 2635:) 2613:) 2595:) 2580:) 2557:) 2528:| 2512:) 2504:. 2489:) 2436:| 2406:? 2314:| 2291:) 2269:) 2218:, 2206:38 2202:90 2163:| 2147:) 2119:| 2100:) 2080:. 2040:| 2025:) 1991:| 1968:) 1937:| 1914:) 1828:) 1806:| 1778:) 1664:~~ 1659:~~ 1655:2 1636:: 1622:do 1607:| 1498:) 1456:: 1442:) 1418:| 1398:, 1394:, 1375:) 1325:| 1275:| 1248:. 1177:| 1140:| 1132:. 1117:-- 1097:| 1072:) 1043:| 1023:) 994:| 958:) 924:in 897:| 854:) 797:| 775:) 764:}} 758:{{ 739:| 708:) 658:| 551:. 543:, 506:| 462:| 446:) 430:, 408:| 400:. 383:) 361:| 333:) 285:| 258:) 232:| 213:) 191:) 165:| 116:) 86:→ 4998:. 4896:( 4805:. 4746:( 4732:( 4622:( 4597:( 4550:( 4405:( 4391:( 4357:( 4294:( 4278:( 4206:( 4183:( 4158:( 4039:( 3997:( 3944:. 3936:( 3893:( 3850:( 3790:( 3747:! 3647:( 3633:( 3618:( 3596:( 3556:( 3225:( 3211:( 3156:( 2973:( 2949:. 2819:T 2813:C 2810:( 2781:( 2762:( 2738:( 2694:( 2651:( 2631:( 2609:( 2591:( 2576:( 2553:( 2508:( 2485:( 2399:) 2394:· 2388:· 2382:· 2376:· 2370:· 2364:· 2358:· 2352:· 2346:· 2341:( 2287:( 2265:( 2247:( 2210:3 2208:/ 2204:/ 2143:( 2096:( 2021:( 1964:( 1910:( 1902:( 1878:( 1824:( 1774:( 1753:• 1745:• 1733:• 1725:• 1712:• 1704:• 1535:† 1509:C 1494:( 1438:( 1371:( 1344:/ 1301:/ 1220:— 1068:( 1019:( 954:( 850:( 771:( 704:( 626:· 621:( 612:· 607:( 582:C 579:/ 566:• 556:• 442:( 379:( 329:( 254:( 209:( 187:( 112:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index