112:(XXG), make some good, quality contributions other than just reverting articles where Gio was active. Str1977 and Musical Linguist are good editors; work with them (and the rest of us). I wouldn't just revert without gaining a consensus first...that way leads to trouble. I hope things work out...
111:
articles or elsewhere (heck, on any subject) - which are not controversial, non-confrontational. It's true, you're starting your Wiki career in a bad spot because of your association with a controversial user. That's really unfortunate, and probably unfair. So, if you're serious about
Knowledge
122:
Thanks for the advise. But, I did not just rv to Gio's version, I made my own changes based on feedback by Str1977, and accepted your changes. I agree its not fair that I'm met with such hostility over a small mistake. We all learn by mistakes. And, I have been working with everyone, here, but I'm
134:
P.S. I know Gio for a long time and he is a a very smart, educated, and kind person; Belinda Gong is a different person-- his wife. I know they also can make lot of valuable contributions to this encylopedia, and it seems to me that a lot of the hostility against him is overblown and stems from
88:
Ok, I re-read it and see that section, which is still a little unclear in my mind. It seems to talk about voting and arbitration disputes, not about editing an article that I'm intersted in. Also, it says, "Do not call these users "meatpuppets"; be civil." I guess your not supposed to call me a
68:
also. And please be aware that the enormous tolerance we showed for
Giovanni before he was blocked is wearing out. You're on very very shaky ground. I'm sure, if you are a different person, you don't want to start your career on Knowledge (XXG) with a block.
64:
Secondly, for your own sake, I urge you to stop reverting. Even if you're not a sockpuppet for
Giovanni, you are not entitled, as a meatpuppet, to show up and start reverting to his POV. Read
123:
just running into a brick wall, it seems. I'll take a look at some other articles that interest me. Thanks, again.
73:
70:
136:
124:
90:
31:
48:
52:
44:
17:
65:
43:
Hello, Freethinker. Just two things. First, you say on this page that you've looked at
108:
113:
21:
139:
127:
116:
93:
75:
34:
24:
104:
51:
that you don't know what a meatpuppet is. I suggest you read
103:My suggestion would be to make some edits - on the
8:
7:
14:
1:
140:02:01, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
128:02:01, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
117:01:51, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
94:01:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
76:01:23, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
35:23:19, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
25:23:15, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
55:again; it's explained there.
156:
135:ideologial differences.
49:Christianity talk page
47:. Then you say on the
147:
30:I have. Thanks.
155:
154:
150:
149:
148:
146:
145:
144:
12:
11:
5:
153:
151:
143:
142:
131:
130:
101:
100:
99:
98:
97:
96:
81:
80:
79:
78:
59:
58:
57:
56:
38:
37:
16:Please review
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
152:
141:
138:
137:Freethinker99
133:
132:
129:
126:
125:Freethinker99
121:
120:
119:
118:
115:
110:
106:
95:
92:
91:Freethinker99
87:
86:
85:
84:
83:
82:
77:
74:
72:
67:
63:
62:
61:
60:
54:
50:
46:
42:
41:
40:
39:
36:
33:
32:Freethinker99
29:
28:
27:
26:
23:
19:
109:Christianity
102:
89:meatpuppet?
15:
53:WP:SOCK
45:WP:SOCK
18:WP:SOCK
66:WP:3RR
114:KHM03
105:Jesus
22:KHM03
107:and
71:AnnH
20:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.