User talk:Fullmetal2887 - Knowledge (XXG)

185:), one that you reverted TTN's redirect. Your edit summary said "there is no violation of WP:EP". Well, not only do they not come close to the guidelines set forth by WP:EPISODE, but they are clear violation of copyrights. The screenshot, and the plot, are both non-free, and thus must provide a fair-use rationale for their existence. When it comes to images, FU rationales are on the image page (which the image has, but does not fulfill). For plot summaries, you need realworld context on the page to justify their use. That means production information, or reception information, or something that isn't "in-universe". This page has nothing but a plot (one that is overly long at that), thus it not only doesn't meet the criteria for an episode article, but it meets the criteria to considered a copyright violation. Remember, all shows are copyrighted by their networks, as the only reason we are allowed to give any kind of detail is because we are supposed to be provided critical commentary on the subject. This isn't IMDb, or TV.com, this is an encyclopedia. The only way we can justify encyclopedic fair use is to provide critical commentary, which goes for the image as well. Just putting a generic fair use rationale on the image isn't enough. There needs to be critical commentary in the article to justify needing an image to illustrate something. This is why all those images were pulled from the "list of episodes" articles. Because do not justify image use, and detailed plots (like what is in the article that I linked) can cause legal problems. And studios have successfully sued over this type of infringement. Being a "non-profit" business doesn't exclude us from lawsuits and copyright infringements, especially when we don't provide a justifiable reason for their use. Knowledge (XXG) isn't a substitution for watching an episode, a film, or reading a book. I saw your comment to TTN, and yes, plot summaries should be included..but to add context to the real world information. Plot summaries should never be their own articles. 2502:, that Fullmetal might act out of frustration again in the future. Therefore, I won't lift the block unconditionally, but am willing to exchange it for a topic ban from post-1932 American politics. That topic ban can be appealed no sooner than six months from now. I also need a personal assurance from Fullmetal that he has removed the "Drumpf" extension, or in some other way has made sure it will never affect Knowledge (XXG) again. Fullmetal, please look up 306: 1672:

Trump administration to be able to edit about it objectively(your browser extension, while certainly your choice to have, doesn't help) I'm not convinced here that you won't make another similar edit due to frustration, so I must decline your request. It will be up to the next reviewer, but I suspect you will need to agree to some sort of topic ban from edits related to the Trump administration or even US politics in general.

2422: 1410: 2672: 1123: 813: 3159: 3022: 2934: 2767: 1279: 1177: 1029: 956: 1757: 1487: 3124:. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in 253:

policies then you should have simply cut down those parts of the articles. Furthermore, next time kindly discuss such radical changes before taking them. As a result, I am restoring all the articles. If you wish to discuss this further, reply at my talk page. However, until then please do not redirect the articles again. Thanks for your understanding. Fullmetal2887 05:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)"

1433: 1981:. I checked all 1,633 tweets since:2020-01-30 until:2020-02-01 that included the words Senate AND (dead OR died OR formerly), and found just two that even broke into triple digits of RTs and/or Likes. Obviously neither went viral. The top such tweet had but 141 RTs and 349 Likes. And, significantly, none of those 1,633 tweets mentioned Knowledge (XXG). The only tweet that 3109: 2728: 1364: 2689:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1140:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 260:! You say I've redirected all the Fullmetal Alchemist pages and done major edits to plot summaries? If you look on my contribution page, or the history page for Fullmetal Alchemist, you'll see IT WASN'T ME. Either that, or someone else has used my name for their edits, and whatever you're babbling about wasn't me. Check my 2643:- sorry I didn't mean that to sound like a castigation. It was merely a friendly caution about driving close to the median as I know we want to ensure prolific content contributors such as yourself are able to contribute without encumbrance. (Thanks to Bishonen for more adroitly communicating my imperfect comment!) 2161:

But I was under the impression that we are here (user Talk page) specifically discussing the block. So I commented here, not there. As to personal interpretation of Twitter messages, that is germane to the user's unblock request, where he asserts he's being punished for his edit going viral on social

2098:

my tweet had received very little attention (as you would expect since I previously only had ~100 followers) until @JoyceWhiteVance tweeted about it. I never expected or wanted all the attention it subsequently received, although I admit I did enjoy it at the time. I realize it was a mistake both to

2004:

has not acknowledged that he is the Twitter user who bragged about this vandalism a mere two minutes after Fullmetal2887 edited Knowledge (XXG). And to be sure, there is room for doubt. For example, as Fuzheado notes, "The wiki user did not express regret until blocked." By contrast, the Twitter user

1935:

I can't review this again. But if you hadn't have put the edit there in the first place, it wouldn't have needed to be reverted an hour later or even ten seconds later. The block is not a punishment; I was unconvinced that you would not act out of frustration again in the future. A topic ban would

1869:

Bad block. @El C: A quick look at Fullmetal's contribs shows that your reason of WP:NOTHERE is false on its face. One bad edit does not render an editor NOTHERE. If an otherwise productive editor has a problem with political articles, a TBAN from the community is a lot clearer than forcing an editor

1701:

Therefore, this block is indeed preventative and not punitive, as the user has not been transparent nor complete in describing the series of events. It has been up to the admins here to reconcile and clean up behind the activities of the user. The user is potentially in violation of multiple aspects

70:

You recently added two future episode titles and summaries to the list. Please note that this information can only be added when it is supported by a verifiable and reliable source. TV.com is not considered as a reliable source as it is user-submitted. The only source that is considered valid is the

1888:

The issue of vandalism to the U.S. Senate article itself justifies blocking. The other edits also justify blocking since blocks are meant to be protective, not punitive. For instance, an improperly configured browser extension may have resulted in unintended vandalism, but vandalism nonetheless did

160:

How exactly do those meet the guideline? Episodes must contain out of universe material (reception and development, not directors) backed by secondary sources (these have none). Plot summaries cannot be the only content on the page; an episode has to have pretty much all the things outlined on the

2608:

Yes, Fullmetal2887, topic bans are very strict; you're supposed to not edit, however minorly, articles that are related to American politic, as obviously those two articles are. Please keep that in mind till August. That said, I can't say I'm worried about those two edits as such. They really are

1706:

policy - self-interest, amusing outside parties, editorial dishonesty, lack of interest in working constructively. If the user wants any chance of being reinstated, I suggest they volunteer all the relevant info openly and completely. Full disclosure: I was originally involved as an admin for the

1671:

The edit you made about the US Senate was visible for over an hour and was seen by readers and made viral on social media, which damaged Knowledge (XXG)'s reputation. Combined with your other edits, it seems to me that you are too passionate about US politics or at a minimum issues related to the

1640:

I have a 13-year-long history of making valuable contributions to Knowledge (XXG) (including reversions of vandalism) and have been thanked by other editors and administrators for my edits many times. I have never engaged in edit-warring or other disruptive behavior prior to this incident. This

1697:

policy, we are limited in how much we can link on-wiki users with social media profiles or actual human identities. However, this much is clear: a Twitter user bragged about this vandalism edit publicly on social media, which gained more than 9,000 likes and 2,500 retweets. The Twitter user took

252:

episodes. In fact, according to the Content section of that article, a plot summary and information on an episode's significance to the overall plot SHOULD be included in the article. If you feel that the articles contained too much plot summary as to be a violation of Knowledge (XXG)'s fair use

1041:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1189:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2202:. In gauging this editor's sincerity, Twitter could be uniquely helpful. Certainly Fullmetal2887 is under no obligation to reveal his Twitter username. But as I mentioned above, the Twitter user in question has not apologized, and is taking exactly the same stance as 626: 2099:

commit and perhaps especially to brag about the vandalism, and I have since tweeted to discourage people from repeating my error. I don’t know what more I can do to convince you that I won’t do anything like this again. I just want to move on from this incident.

2493:

Drumpf thing is stupid, but I (and no doubt other admins) have several times excused users who used that stupid extension without realizing what harm it could do on Knowledge (XXG). (I remember especially one guy who changed every occurrence of "Trump" on

827:

To the editor who like attention I hereby bestow this attention grabbing Barnstar of Good Humor. I must confess that this is the first time in a long time I've had such a good chuckle over userpage content, so do enjoy the Barnstar - you've earned it :)

360:

Greetings White Cat! I'm currently revamping my user page and I like yours so much that I'd like to use it as a model for mine (format, etc.). I thought I should ask your permission before doing so. Please let me know if this is all right with you.

968:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

2555:

Glad to hear it. In the meantime, I've done some thinking about the topic ban, and decided that it really isn't necessary in this case to make it indefinite with an appeal in six months. Instead I'm topic banning you from post-1932 American politics

1850:

I realize now that Knowledge (XXG) is not the place for such outbursts and that my recklessness damaged Knowledge (XXG)'s reputation as a repository of unbiased information. I am willing to agree to a topic ban or a more limited form of sanction but

1841:

It is unreasonable to punish me for my edit going viral on social media, as the tweets that first went viral about it were not even my own. Nor is it reasonable to punish me for other Knowledge (XXG) users carrying out similar forms of vandalism -

2143:, this new comment seems to be more about personal interpretation of Twitter messages than Knowledge (XXG). An ANI thread exists; let's perhaps keep the discussion in one place, and let's focus on Knowledge (XXG) itself when discussing the topic. 610: 605: 2210:: "I stand by my edit," he declared defiantly, "which was 100% factually correct." Under the circumstances, it would greatly clarify our understanding if Fullmetal2887 would voluntarily for the record deny and disavow the Twitter user whom both 209:

Thought I'd let you know those discussions were closed. Determing if a page needs to be merge is not a place for the incident board. TTN's behavior is, but not his actions themselves. The discussion is on the talk page of the list of episodes.

1583:, which I admit was one example of bias. I understand that this edit was disruptive and violated Knowledge (XXG)'s policies. However, this was a single, isolated incident born of extreme frustration, which I would not repeat if unblocked. 1649:

erroneously cited as justification for blocking me. One incident of vandalism is hardly grounds for an indefinite block, and I will not make any such disruptive edits again if unblocked. A continuing block on me would contradict the

171:

As I stated, you cannot just take a couple of those. They need plot summaries along with reception and development. You cannot pick and choose. You also need verifiable info from secondary sources before the articles are even created.

1689:

The user appealing this failed to mention that they had a chance to rescind the edit and apologize for a temporary lack of judgment but did the opposite. Instead, the user said "I stand by my edit, which was 100% factually correct."

2009:

He has repeatedly confirmed he made the edit; has not deleted his tweet that went viral, instead making it his account's pinned tweet lest anyone mistake him for some other vandal; and has unashamedly basked in the attention (both

713: 709: 3204: 3067: 2977: 2810: 1322: 1217: 1069: 996: 552:

is against Knowledge (XXG)'s policies. "If you continue to vandalize articles," you wrote, "you will be reported to administrators and subsequently blocked from the site." Of course, much can change in 12 years.

866:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1893:

always applies. Continuation of the block for a period of time would allow the editor in question to check things like their browser extensions to ensure they are interacting on WP using reliable software.

3188:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3051:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2961:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2794:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1306:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1201:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1053:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 980:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1870:

to agree to one as an unblock condition from an indef. And your citing concern over Knowledge (XXG)'s reputation is, frankly, bullshit. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:50, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

1576:

incorrectly stated that I "show a pattern spanning nearly three years of violating Knowledge (XXG)'s Neutral Point of View policy by clearly expressing editorial bias." Among the examples he cites:

2252:, and I unpinned my original tweet hours ago. I don't think it should be deleted as that would be an alteration of history, but I disavowed my actions and encouraged people not to repeat them. 1878:, and I unpinned my original tweet hours ago. I don't think it should be deleted as that would be an alteration of history, but I disavowed my actions and encouraged people not to repeat them. 1698:

pleasure in the resulting compliments and inspired other forms of on-wiki vandalism. The resulting vandalism was picked up by media outlets. The wiki user did not express regret until blocked.

3173: 3036: 2947: 2780: 2466: 2458: 2451: 2443: 2439: 2344:

I accidentally edited my talk page from a different device on which I was logged out. I subsequently logged in and changed the signature. Why are you always assuming the worst in people?

1292: 1246: 338:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 615: 2360:

You've been editing Knowledge (XXG) since November 2006. You ought to know by now why it's important to explain in the edit summary why you are changing another user's contribution.

705: 2736: 334:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2438:

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

1968:

a Twitter user who "bragged about this vandalism edit publicly on social media, which gained more than 9,000 likes and 2,500 retweets," I feel free to expand upon that point.

1951:

It is fair to say that if I hadn't put the edit there in the first place, it wouldn't have needed to be reverted. I sincerely apologize and I won't make this mistake again.

1414: 146:. If you do not list it within a reasonable amount of time, I will assume you no longer wish it deleted and remove the tag. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. -- 2492:

I believe Fullmetal has apologized adequately. Looking at his contributions in other areas, it is surely not the case that he's not here to contribute. The Trump —: -->

327:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

2914:

It's not a threat. It was a warning. You are engaging in edit warring and being disruptive. If you continue to do so I will be forced to take action. That's all.

323:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1928:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1748:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2869: 920: 778: 697: 1797: 1527: 1451: 51:

Also, it is good to use an edit summary when you contribute, as suggested above. It does help understand what you changed. Thanks, and enjoy the wiki.

1631: 2701: 1152: 343: 1693:

The user performed the edit and within minutes, a Twitter post appears that highlights the exact edit that performed the vandalism. Because of our

264:

for proof! Never point the finger blaming people for things that they haven't done. I've stated and proved my innocence, so I accept your apology.

1597:

noted that part of the reason for impeachment is Trump's alleged obstruction of Congress, which in fact is the second article of impeachment.

256:

What are you talking about!? The only change I've EVER made to ANY Full Metal Alchemist page was a grammar correction in the trivia section in

2469:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 1913: 1733: 1458: 2865: 916: 774: 693: 527: 2720: 2211: 3227: 3090: 3000: 2832: 2631:. I've tried to be diligent in complying with my topic ban, sorry if these two edits skirted the line. I'll be more careful going forward. 1344: 1231: 1083: 1010: 891: 423: 2217: 1990: 1792: 1522: 335: 686:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

1100: 505: 471: 440: 2462: 1610:, which were mistakenly caused by a Chrome browser extension. Those were good-faith edits in which "Trump" got changed to "Drumpf" 561:

please update your views on vandalizing Knowledge (XXG). In particular, should a good Wikipedian give due warning to the offender?

508:. And far from whining, I am being a good Wikipedian by reverting vandalism when I see it and giving due warning to the offender. 1375:

appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please

444: 245: 3223: 3086: 2996: 2828: 1340: 1227: 1079: 1006: 887: 3197: 3060: 2970: 2803: 1315: 1210: 1062: 989: 2732: 2498:

to "Drumpf", and had no idea he had done so.) On the other hand, I have taken on board the worries expressed above, e. g. by

913:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 771:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 690:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2685:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1136:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 315:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2681: 1634: 2690: 2447: 1141: 328: 311: 3113: 2051:, which was the first to go viral. You didn't find it because it doesn't contain any of the keywords you searched for. 1770: 1651: 1625: 1500: 1446: 1441: 878:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3209: 3072: 2982: 2904: 2815: 1811: 1541: 1327: 1222: 1074: 1001: 883: 671: 382: 182: 1764: 1494: 1376: 687: 285:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Mass_deletion_of_television_articles_by_TTN

2478: 1769:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1499:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

905:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

763:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1890: 3142: 531: 56: 2162:

media, particularly on Twitter. Fullmetal2887 opened the door, and I responded on point and at the same thread.

125: 2739:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards,

2377:

afaics, you're misunderstanding the change. Fullmetal changed his own comment (signed it), not anybody else's.

1864: 284: 3185: 3048: 2958: 2791: 1303: 1198: 1050: 977: 1859:

applies to people who have a pattern of unhelpful edits, which I have demonstrated is not the case. To quote

1853:

an indefinite block after one isolated mistake following 13 years of productive contributions is unreasonable

1628: 1255:

suggests you are using an auto-replacement script. Could you turn it off please to avoid problems like this?

2859: 523: 2900: 1103:

of the Board of Supervisors. Her political future beyond adding "acting mayor" to her portfolio is TBD. –

436: 257: 1132: 879: 549: 288: 2579: 2474: 1936:

help with that- and I will leave it to whomever reviews this to decide what the topic ban should cover.

486:

Psycho T wasn't vandalism, that's his nickname. If you don't even follow the sport then stop whining.

392:

start with "List of", and 2) why have you not discussed this on the talk page prior to either move? --

2048: 3138: 2850:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2207: 1994: 1372: 398: 52: 3167: 3030: 2941: 2774: 2560:

six months, to expire automatically on August 12. The block has been lifted and the t-ban is logged

2249: 2022: 1875: 1856: 1703: 1642: 1380: 1286: 1185: 1037: 964: 946: 855: 846: 448: 3125: 2648: 2599: 1899: 1379:

or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the

833: 732: 347: 249: 3181: 3044: 2954: 2787: 1694: 1299: 1194: 1046: 973: 875: 859: 320: 2915: 2746: 2640: 2632: 2614: 2569: 2547: 2511: 2382: 2365: 2355: 2345: 2323: 2304: 2294: 2277: 2263: 2253: 2231: 2176:

Further to the relevance of tweets in considering Fullmetal2887's unblock request: Administrator

2167: 2148: 2123: 2110: 2100: 2082: 2067: 2062: 2052: 2030: 2001: 1952: 1860: 1775: 1720: 1712: 1655: 1505: 1422: 1395: 1384: 1108: 566: 543: 509: 477: 403: 362: 2737:

Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 2#Characters of Blood+ (other characters)

1991:"I made some edits to Knowledge (XXG) this morning #RIPGOP #RIPSenate #RIPDemocracy #RIPAmerica" 1982: 504:

I undid that edit when I realized my mistake. That doesn't change the fact that you vandalized

26:

Hi. Just wanted to let you know that any math notation should be italic, so instead of a plain

2074: 2011: 558: 487: 3117: 2885: 2015: 936: 794: 749: 645: 470:

is against Knowledge (XXG)'s policies. If you continue to vandalize articles as you did with

431: 408: 373: 223: 198: 89: 3193: 3056: 2966: 2799: 2506:

to see what a "topic ban" is, and reply below to say if my conditions are acceptable to you.

2503: 1383:. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 1311: 1206: 1058: 985: 871: 863: 452: 427: 388:

Just to get to the brass tacks of the issue: 1) what "naming standards" say that the article

324: 3216: 3079: 2989: 2822: 2530: 2428:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

1941: 1922: 1742: 1677: 1464: 1334: 585: 305: 3196:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3189: 3059:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3052: 2969:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2962: 2802:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2795: 2546:

I uninstalled the browser extension in question several days ago, and I accept your offer.

1585:

It is my desire and intention to contribute positively to Knowledge (XXG) for years to come

1314:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1307: 1209:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1202: 1061:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1054: 988:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 981: 874:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 867: 520:

Donald Trump is the president get over. And stop changing it on wiki. Like black panther.

143: 139: 2709: 1160: 621: 393: 273: 265: 2686: 1137: 316: 2862:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 261: 110:

as the title that is shown on the press release is actually "Fin Del Camino". Regards,

2644: 2624: 2595: 1895: 1260: 829: 491: 147: 107: 103: 2421: 467: 2876:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2740: 2628: 2610: 2591: 2565: 2541: 2522: 2507: 2378: 2374: 2361: 2339: 2319: 2288: 2273: 2242: 2227: 2163: 2144: 2140: 2119: 2093: 2078: 2042: 2026: 1962: 1855:

and would only serve to punish, when less extreme measures could be used to prevent.

1716: 1573: 1418: 1391: 1368: 1104: 927:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

785:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

740:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

562: 2881: 2877: 2851: 2585: 932: 928: 790: 786: 745: 741: 637: 212: 187: 132: 84:

Hi. Sorry deleting your edits indicating "nonsense info". The reason is written by

3158: 3021: 2933: 2766: 1846:

on social media or anywhere else. I was passionate in the heat of the moment, and

1587:, including on topics related to U.S. politics and the presidency of Donald Trump. 1278: 1176: 1028: 955: 812: 474:, you will be reported to administrators and subsequently blocked from the site. 142:. RFD nominations are a two step process. Please complete the second step on the 2526: 2499: 1937: 1708: 1673: 910: 728: 724: 581: 111: 85: 76: 1620:, in which I categorized Fox News as "state media". This characterization has 548:

Nearly 12 years ago, you opened this thread by admonishing another editor that

2705: 2188:"I, for one, am unwilling to take the risk of it happening again without some 1156: 663: 3231: 3146: 3094: 3004: 2918: 2908: 2889: 2836: 2752: 2713: 2652: 2635: 2617: 2603: 2572: 2550: 2534: 2514: 2482: 2385: 2369: 2348: 2332: 2297: 2281: 2256: 2235: 2196:"I sincerely apologize and I won't make this mistake again." The keyword is 2177: 2171: 2152: 2127: 2103: 2086: 2055: 2034: 1955: 1945: 1903: 1723: 1681: 1658: 1646: 1480: 1477: 1426: 1398: 1348: 1264: 1256: 1235: 1164: 1112: 1087: 1014: 940: 895: 837: 798: 764: 753: 720: 676: 651: 589: 570: 535: 512: 495: 480: 457: 412: 365: 350: 291: 229: 204: 176: 165: 150: 114: 92: 79: 60: 2899:

You can't go around threatening other users either. You should learn more.

1971:"It is unreasonable to punish me for my edit going viral on social media," 1432: 1457:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the

283:

You should please add your side of things to the following discussion at

173: 162: 72: 3200:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3063:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2973:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2806:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2727: 1461:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 1363: 1318:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1213:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1065:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

992:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3177:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3040:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2951:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2855: 2784:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1296:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

862:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

2115:

I too want to move on. Perhaps you missed my edit over two hours ago

1975:"as the tweets that first went viral about it were not even my own." 906: 768: 71:

press release by FOX, which will also be published by the media like

2223: 2609:

very minor, and aren't in themselves to do with American politics.

2021:

So maybe, just maybe, Fullmetal2887 is being wrongfully blamed for

1641:

long history is strong evidence that I do not meet the criteria of

244:

You've recently posted this on my talk page: "There is nothing at

371:

Feel free to! It's licensed under a free license after all! :) --

3213:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3076:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2986:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2819:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2434:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

1331:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3203:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

3171:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

3066:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

3034:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

2976:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

2809:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

1321:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

1216:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

1068:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

995:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

2945:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

2778:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

620:

It is dedicated to improving all articles associated with the

300:

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Fullmetal Alchemist s01e26.png)

2667:

Orphaned non-free image File:San Francisco Bay Ferry logo.jpg

138:, but you have not completed the nomination by listing it at 2670: 1755: 1485: 1431: 1247:

Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 December 8

1121: 1608:

Donald Trump disclosure of classified information to Russia

1417:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

2023:

trying to score brownie points outside of Knowledge (XXG).

1652:

policy that blocks should be preventative and not punitive

2293:

I don’t see how that makes it any less valid or sincere.

1910:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

1730:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

1389:

Please stop adding opinionated and inaccurate information

1930:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1750:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1290:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

3184: