User talk:GLPeterson - Knowledge (XXG)

1575:

can be subject to small amounts of error. Level two is cause and effect. That's a rigorous deduction based on the laws of nature; on the conservation of mass, energy, and momentum; on Newtonian mechanics, Ohm's law, Charles's law, and all those kinds of relationships. These techniques for solving problems are not error free, but they do provide reliable and repeatable results. At the third level I put correlation studies. These are statistical techniques which allow the drawing of general and reasonable conclusions, but imprecise conclusions. An example of this is when you hear a conclusion such as 62 percent of the people who eat pistachio ice cream 20 or more times a week tend to gain weight. The fourth level is opinion sampling. Conclusions here can be useful, but they are often temperable and not repeatable. . . . — Neil Armstrong

1401:

2131:

change the article in any way that restores your preferred version or even part of it, it will be seen as a resumption of edit warring and may result in a longer block. Does that answer your question? Finally, don't lose sleep over this. It's not worth it. If it's too upsetting to you to edit here - and I acknowledge that editing at Knowledge (XXG) can be hard for many people until they become experienced - then don't edit here. I don't mean that "to get rid of you". I mean it sincerely. Your health and your real life are much more important than Knowledge (XXG). Oh, by the way, I can't always respond quickly as I, too, have a real life.

1987: 457: 340: 2755: 2483: 1752: 1691: 614: 3724: 3505: 4463: 4371: 3855: 3644: 3259: 2904:) but have come to believe there is no mechanism for assigning a facilitator to get the ball rolling. Knowledge (XXG) editing used to be a joyful experience. Over the last 12 or so months it has become psychologically taxing. Nevertheless, I will try to persevere, with hope that I might eventually make a small contribution leading to betterment of the human condition. Thank you for your kind concern. 866: 489: 4062: 2842: 1434: 4285: 4219: 4154: 2513: 970: 802: 3111: 3335: 3078: 2675: 2930:“If ever we can ascertain at what period the earth's charge, when disturbed, oscillates with respect to an oppositely electrified system or known circuit, we shall know a fact possibly of the greatest importance to the welfare of the human race. I propose to seek for the period by means of an electrical oscillator, or a source of alternating electric currents." 2135: 633:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1247: 676: 761: 4119: 4020: 3979: 3938: 1944: 276: 2097:. Is the bulk removal of technical details from an article bearing the tag, "This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve this article to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. The talk page may contain suggestions." a violation of Knowledge (XXG) policy?-- 2076:). It appears my intellectual tools are insufficient to cope with the present level of uncivil discourse that exists on Knowledge (XXG), and all the more so as time passes. Are you available to review my next comment when I post it on the Wireless power article talk page after my being blocked for edit warring? The link is 2364:

I respect your desire to improve the article. But we're all working toward that goal. I don't understand some of your edits, for example the figures in the "Directivity" column of the table in the "Overview" section. Can you please discuss your edits on the Talk page first, and give edit comments,

1712:

It is highly recommended that you make a statement at the above linked noticeboard with regards to your edits, particularly those that other editors have raised concerns about. Continued disruption of articles with original research and synthesis, both of which are prohibited on Knowledge (XXG), will

2130:

I appreciate your seeking guidance, but I'm not altogether clear what you're asking. What's most important at this point is that you use the article Talk page to discuss any changes you wish to make and that you obtain a clear consensus from other editors for your proposed changes. Otherwise, if you

2923:“Starting from two facts that the earth is a conductor insulated in space, and that a body cannot be charged without causing an equivalent displacement of electricity in the earth, I undertook to construct a machine suited for creating as large a displacement as possible of the earth's electricity.” 1052:

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can

2153:

Thank you for you prompt response. I'm interested in learning if the bulk removal of technical details from an article bearing the tag, "This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve this article to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the

1828:

RE: Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents). I learned that no mechanism exists for the assignment of legal counsel to assist me, in light of which I proceeded forward in the best manner that I know of. This involved making changes to the article with accompanying explanations of

1819:

Thank you for taking an interest in my case. As you may already be aware, I have contacted Knowledge (XXG) by e-mail on 12/7/2014 with a request for assistance in my ongoing effort to counter what I perceive as a violation of Knowledge (XXG) policy and to correct a fundamental error that has been

1574:

When knowledge, facts, or solutions are sought, there are a number of techniques available from which to select. These techniques can be ranked according to their effectiveness, from the most certain to the most uncertain. At the top, or level one, is measurement; but even excellent measurements

1400:

1835:

Getting back to the matter at hand, to wit, my ongoing work to improve the Wireless power article and what I perceive as a disruptive effort on the part of three Knowledge (XXG) Users to stifle my efforts, how do you suggest that I proceed? I am willing to endure the psychological pain that I am

1379:

We should probably not devote excess space in an article on historical dead ends tangential to the current state of the art. We probably don't serve the reader well with lengthy quotations from Tesla on how he thought the laws of physics worked, when these are (hem) at variance with the current

3607:

Thank you. I have taken you at your word that you won't continue and unblocked you. Please use the article talk pages to discuss your ideas with the other editors. Even if other editors disagree with you, there are ways of getting other opinions and mediation that helps avoid edit wars. Of the

3451:

or what I have written above don't you understand? Since you blanked the ANI notice as you have other attempts to communicate with you here on this talk page, it is presumed that you have read it. You need to read all of these links that we have been giving you. I note that you haven't been

3656:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3867:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1878:

Any success in such lopsidedness will be increasingly short-lived. These are the synergetic rules that evolution is employing and trying to make clear to us. They are not man-made laws. They are the infinitely accommodative laws of the intellectual integrity governing universe.

2236:

article during the period starting 13 December 2014 up to the present. While the recent modifications have some merit, previous issues of contention are still to be addressed. I too have a life other than Knowledge (XXG) so further pursuit of these matters by myself may not be

831:

or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our

2819:. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 2296:

Second, generally a draft is of a new article, not of an existing article. Are you trying to create "your version" of the existing article? I don't have the time to compare the two, so it's easier just to ask you. Anyway, please explain a bit more what you're doing.

3199:

There are multiple editors who dispute your content, and dispute that there is consensus to insert it. You need to stop and get others (maybe some other uninvolved editors) to agree that at least there is some agreement, and recognize that it might not go your

3271:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

3468:. Given that you keep doing these as-yet-unexplained reverts that are seen as disruptive and refuse to communicate in a meaningful way that leads to you being blocked until we have assurances that you won't continue. Now please explain your actions. 3754:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1384:

is already far too long for its contents and needs to be a concise overview of the field, not just another place to trot out the same old tired fanboy claims (which are already lovingly and minutely detailed in the Tesla-specific articles),

1006:

infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of

1443:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

2154:

technical details. The talk page may contain suggestions" might be judged to be an infringement of Knowledge (XXG) policy. As for my poor behavior, I have learned my lesson and will be operating in a much different manner from now on.--

1059:

to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with

823:

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

4506: 4414: 3895: 3684: 3299: 3758:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

2959:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2308:

on 16 December 2014. I alerted you of this action in my previous message. The existing illegitimate "article" contains errors and omissions that I am preparing to address at this time, hence the two new user

1836:

presently experiencing, suffer the 48 hour block, and then resume my present interaction with these individuals on the article's Talk page, if this is the least offensive alternative to all parties involved.

1510:, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the 3094:) and such material must state (with sources) its significance to the article topic/why its being copied into an article. Also please do not remove reliable secondary sourced material without reason. 2555:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at

4490:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4398:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3879:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3668:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3283:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1357:. As far as I know in professional documents the word transposer is preferred for ground station technology. Can you please check if the word translator has replaced transposer recently ? Thanks. 4476: 4384: 2774: 1552:) your ownership of the main sources you are citing, tfcbooks.com and TESLARADIO.COM, which, with wholesale quoting and paraphrasing of these sources, is getting to the point of violating 2738:

restoring this page it has been returned to the status quo ante, so you should "discuss" and not engage in back-and-forth reverts because that will probably be viewed as edit-warring.

1512: 2897:

clpo13: I've tried that in the past and my efforts have been stifled. I would like to take a stab at implementing a program of consensus decision-making using the Quaker-based model (

55:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing!

1764: 1756: 2704:

Please avoid using archaic wording from 100+ year old primary sources when describing technology and please check to make sure that what you add is actually in the cited sources.

4560: 4555: 1856:

Thanks for your response. What adjustments do you plan to make to your user page after your block expires? I can remove the article portion of your user page now if you wish.--

1544:

the problems with your edits re: drawing conclusions from primary sources and/or using them, or FRINGE writers opinions on them, as statements of fact in Knowledge (XXG) (see

597:

In the WTE article (induction sec), isn't it structures ... s ... for the launching and receiver elements? If I am wrong, please restore. Thanks on you quality work though. --

3448: 2786: 2628:

is not conducive to editing in a collegial atmosphere. Please restrict yoruself to the issues, especially in edit summaries which cannot be withdrawn or struck afterwards.

2487: 2168:

I would say that a significant removal of material from the article based on the tag is a bad idea at this point. However, you may propose such a removal on the Talk page.--

1695: 2288:

Good, but I'm confused by what you're doing. First, normally you would create a draft as a subpage of your user page, not as a subpage of your talk page. You've done both.

1099: 1029:

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge (XXG) to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you

3404:...you will have to 1.) explain the repeated reverts 2.) regardless of the reason, you will stop. This isn't yours to do with as you please. This is a collaborative site. 1055: 912: 1095: 4084: 3751: 2601:." . . . After his pioneering contribution to the advancement of science and technology is recognized perhaps someone else will see fit to reintroduce his name. . . . 4339:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

995: 963: 873: 859: 813: 795: 4246:, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at 1500: 2263:

I need to work on a Draft of proposed revisions to the above article and used my user page by mistake. Where do I find the instructions for Draft creation?--

3738: 3017: 2451: 2398:

Thanks. Now could you discuss your proposed changes on the Talk page so everyone interested in the article can participate and we can achieve consensus? --

1215: 1162: 1109: 1038: 1912:. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the 1205: 1152: 1034: 837: 4312:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 248: 52: 1201: 1148: 205: 2687: 959: 933: 645: 564: 115: 3081:

Try to keep Knowledge (XXG)'s policies in mind and avoid inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at

1832:

In answer to your question about my user page, I had no idea that such use is strictly forbidden. I'll make the appropriate adjustments forthwith.

3540: 3360: 2800: 2412::- So we are now in full agreement that the directivity of a large dish antenna is 50 dBi, and that of a short dipole antenna is 1.76 dBi? -- 2031: 385: 110: 3013: 2447: 1211: 1158: 1105: 470: 2530:

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply

4528: 4436: 3909: 3698: 3313: 2984: 3821:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge (XXG)'s 1042: 283: 210: 42: 4308:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

4242:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

4177:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

1802:

on your user page? I haven't compared it to see if it's identical, but, regardless, user pages are intended to be used in that manner.--

1876:

Take the initiative. Go to work, and above all co-operate and don't hold back on one another or try to gain at the expense of another.

1598:

can get us blocked. I don't understand the rationale behind your edits. If we talk about this, maybe we can figure something out. --

4047: 2380:: The directivity of an actual antenna can vary from 1.76 dBi for a short dipole, to as much as 50 dBi for a large dish antenna. See 1421: 937: 568: 463: 456: 3170: 2853: 2808: 2037: 373: 360: 120: 3764: 3535: 3099: 2743: 2495: 1703: 1659: 1642: 1564: 581: 38: 4076: 3608:

editors that disagree with you, good ones will still try to help you even if all you can do is agree to disagree. Just ask them.

258: 4524: 4432: 3905: 3694: 3309: 2980: 2791:

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means

4499: 4407: 3888: 3677: 3352: 3292: 3182: 3132: 2548:

code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

2045: 1522:, a friendly space on Knowledge (XXG) where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 1208:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1155:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1102:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 979: 95: 34: 3010:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2695: 2444:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3356: 3186: 2015: 925: 877: 855: 629:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 556: 500: 478: 138: 4181:, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at 3057: 769: 2804: 1061: 929: 634: 560: 438:

Both of these are currently making it very hard for people who have the page on their watchlist to tell what's going on!

181: 163: 158: 4262: 4197: 3742: 3347: 3342: 3192: 2971:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2847: 2816: 2304:

page is a duplicate of the draft text, plus subsequent changes, that was posted as a replacement of the actual article

2049: 1994: 1917: 1022: 105: 4511: 4419: 3900: 3760: 3689: 3304: 3095: 2976: 2739: 2491: 1699: 1655: 1638: 1560: 1087: 339: 3512: 2812: 2691: 986: 625: 355:, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Knowledge (XXG) takes 3825:

and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

2291:

The Talk page associated with /Draft came into existence when I placed a first entry on the /Draft page's Talk page.

4236: 4210: 4051: 4026: 4009: 3985: 3968: 3465: 3002:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2874: 2598: 2524: 2506: 2436:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1452: 1425: 1192:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1139:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1086:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

712: 696: 1913: 828: 153: 4133: 4092: 4034: 1362: 4080: 3178: 3146: 3120: 2796: 2011: 2003: 1760: 1634: 1595: 298: 100: 4171: 4145: 3786: 3776: 3554: 3460:"I've tried that in the past and my efforts have been stifled...." and so you rarely if ever reply pursuant to 420: 4487: 4395: 3876: 3665: 3280: 836:

for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see

288: 253: 3616: 3476: 3412: 3383: 3222: 3124: 3082: 2634: 1271:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

64: 4340: 4247: 4182: 3814: 3091: 3045: 2761:

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge (XXG). It does

2556: 2282: 2115:). I have spent a sleepless night worrying, Looking forward to your guidance. Respectfully, Gary Peterson, 1897: 1003: 833: 434:

Could you please combine some of your many small edits into fewer, larger edits in the future, if possible.

356: 238: 3789:, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from 402: 352: 333: 4309: 4302: 4276: 4243: 4178: 4125: 4108: 3944: 3927: 3430: 3174: 3136: 3128: 2972: 2549: 2041: 1553: 1046: 941: 704: 572: 293: 215: 2878: 2857: 2683: 2301: 1799: 1390: 1259: 537: 2792: 1518: 243: 90: 3456:

and further up on your talk page in a warning dated Oct 2015, you were directed to use talk pages but

1755:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at

4250:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — 4185:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — 4129: 4088: 4030: 2734:, redirect pages are not for developing articles, please use your personal project space. If you are 2314:

Also, I can delete subpages that you don't need, or you can request the deletions yourself by adding

1358: 1331: 1037:. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see 700: 655: 577: 4470: 4378: 4067:

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the

3863: 3652: 3267: 3243: 2948: 2937: 3993: 3952: 3733: 3713: 2409: 2377: 1765:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:GLPeterson reported by User:Chetvorno

1718: 1541: 949: 548: 525: 496: 482: 4483: 4391: 4343:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 4298: 4232: 4167: 3872: 3661: 3401: 3276: 2968: 2952: 1545: 364: 3611: 3486: 3471: 3426: 3407: 3378: 3007: 2645: 2629: 1284:

page_3601.html "Episode 126: Capacitance and the equation C =Q/V"], Institute of Physics website

1193: 1140: 782: 772:

with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going

721: 3139:

rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

3087:. Section headings are by consensus, please propose and explain changes in talk (talk is ongoing 368: 51:

on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to

3053: 3033: 2856:

by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at

2795:

administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the

2467: 2261:

Reverted edits by GLPeterson (talk) to last version by Bbb23 - not on your user page (again)).

1516:. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the 1231: 1178: 1125: 908: 742: 730: 533: 398: 4495: 4403: 3884: 3673: 3288: 2964: 2956: 1890:

Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0

688: 684: 667: 143: 4518: 4426: 4256: 4191: 3830: 3366: 3206: 2887: 2581: 2021: 1901: 1386: 1197: 4498:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4491: 4406:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4399: 4294: 4228: 4163: 4104: 4005: 3964: 3923: 3887:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3880: 3822: 3676:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3669: 3490: 3461: 3453: 3397: 3291:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3284: 2967:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2960: 2735: 2520: 1559:

for this material. May I suggest following that line of editing for this material instead?

1478: 1440: 999: 895: 680: 514: 392: 220: 148: 4347: 3586: 3518: 3434: 3226: 2905: 2654: 2605: 2413: 2385: 2337: 2327: 2264: 2238: 2183: 2173: 2155: 2144: 2116: 2098: 2081: 2057: 1986: 1967: 1956: 1927: 1861: 1842: 1807: 1780: 1729: 1671: 1608: 1580: 1406: 1327: 1251: 845: 649: 378: 320: 60: 3800: 3794: 3790: 1637:#1, #2, and #4. If you continue to follow this pattern I will have to take it to WP:ANI. 630: 428: 3585:

You have my assurances that I will no longer continue to make revisions in this fashion.

3989: 3948: 3003: 2782: 2437: 2399: 2366: 2357: 2317: 2228: 2223: 2007: 1821: 1768: 1714: 1599: 1549: 1523: 1484: 1381: 1373: 1071: 945: 894:

While all contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

773: 513:

While all contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

442: 3810: 3806: 2754: 2573:, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission. 998:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

4549: 4124:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

4025:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

3984:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

3943:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

3024:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2864: 2827: 2778: 2710: 2699: 2458:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1829:

those changes. This good-faith effort has resulted in the present state of affairs.

1222:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1169:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1116:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1019:. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators 777: 488: 3088: 3049: 3029: 3025: 2690:. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to 2463: 2459: 1557: 1227: 1223: 1174: 1170: 1121: 1117: 738: 381:. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Knowledge (XXG). 4462: 4370: 3854: 3643: 3258: 1909: 1905: 1499: 2694:

and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the

4251: 4186: 3826: 3218: 3202: 2882: 2591: 2577: 2381: 2219: 886: 817: 4061: 2901: 2841: 2730:

Continued development in anticipation of merging with the "Surface wave article

1896:

I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under

1433: 3221:, Thank you for taking an interest in the ongoing content editing activity of 2323: 2278: 2256: 2215: 2169: 2140: 2112: 2094: 2073: 2053: 1952: 1871:

Thank you in advance for your assistance. Please remove everything following

1857: 1803: 1346: 996: