338:. What makes you feel that you can't trust me? Those two edits? The final form of that page with my changes is still up, by the way- it was part of the collaborative process of editing with someone that didn't agree with me, not nefarious. Thanks for any reply. Please really tell me what you mean by lack of trust, and look at my long work on Wiktionary. What do you mean you can't trust me? What's not to trust, specifically? Can you look at my history and say "this person is doing much more harm than good"? If I'm doing more good than harm, and the final result on that page was approved by the other editor involved, then my God, where's the trust issue? The other editor involved agrees with the final result on that page, with my change. That editor doesn't like me, but my edits are good enough for them that they're still up, even though they were over the line of the unblock conditions. It seems strange to ban for making a change on a page where the other editor says: "the last edit seems benign, even preferred"- I found a solution to the differences between us and implemented it. I improved the encyclopedia and the other person agrees. That's good, not bad! That was a positive result. Thanks.
83:. The earliest edit was part of a removal of several similar additions of Chinese characters to the lead sections of Russian articles a while back- I link to another article where I make a similar edit. The more recent edit concerning simplified/traditional was about a specific argument related to what should be displayed in the lead section as historically connected to the subject matter for the article. The third edit is described by the other editor in this way: "the last edit seems benign, even preferred", and the content is still up and not removed, but moved to a more appropriate location. Can you see how I might think this is acceptable behavior within the scope of the unblock conditions?
232:
597:
428:
146:
533:
253:
show you that I'm a good editor with a lot to contribute, and hence I would like to request unblock again (oops!). I apologize for breaking the conditions of my unblock by doing those reverts. I can agree to do the same conditions again or similar (with the now clearer understanding that this kind of
370:
Today I learned that removing content that had been in place for months with many intervening edits and moving content from one section to another are both considered reverts. Not what I would have guessed in either case. An opinion on the block itself is above my paygrade, but I would have made the
355:
Another editor saying that your edit was helpful doesn't erase the breaking of the unblock conditions that you agreed to. This makes it harder to trust your words without additional gestures(like 0RR). However, I will not stand in the way of someone else unblocking you(though that is my view only, I
240:
After several years, I got unblocked from
Knowledge (XXG). It was awesome, and I was making great strides in my area of expertise. But unfortunately, I accidentally violated a condition for my unblock: I had a 1RR limit and did two reverts- one partial, and one that moved the content to another part
97:
From that, I can see what you were thinking, but it still wasn't within it. You still removed the same material from the lead three times, and you still agreed you weren't going to do that any more. The agreement was not "I won't revert more than once unless I'm really convinced I'm right", nor even
333:
Thanks for looking at this. You talk about trust in the denial, as the main reason to deny. Could you elaborate on that? I did over 1000 positive edits on
Knowledge (XXG) after I was unblocked with no incident, and two of those were over the line of my conditions for unblock, though the ultimate
116:
Thanks for your help man. I understand what you're saying, and I apologize if I abused your trust in me. I guess they really are reverts, so I didn't fulfil your conditions. I want to try to unblock again, so I will make my request here. Thanks for your efforts working with me.
511:
you posted a single paragraph spanning 41 lines (!) of text without a line break. This makes it incredibly hard for other editors to parse your argument logically. I had to read your text five times to get what you were trying to say. Please break your texts into paragraphs.
283:
I don't think you had anything other than good intentions here, nothing nefarious- but ultimately you broke the conditions for an unblock, and I don't think this request is sufficient to return. Maybe agreeing to a 0RR restriction would help- but trust is a big issue here.
254:
behavior I did is a revert too), or whatever you think is best. I'm sorry. Thanks for any consideration. Check out this discussion thread I started today which is getting all kinds of interesting and encyclopedia-building replies:
56:), so I'm afraid you blew that final chance, and I am reinstating the indefinite block. I believe by now you are familiar with the process for appealing a block, but if you need to refresh your memory, that's at the
450:
385:
I also wouldn't have guessed that moving information from one section to another is considered a revert. I don't think they should have been reblocked over this, but that's not a decision I get to make.
259:
41:
Please note that this is a final chance, and that any violation of these conditions or other disruption is likely to lead to the indefinite block being reinstated without further warning
619:
79:
Thanks for working with me. I am willing to self-revert any of my edits if they violate my unblock conditions. My interaction with the editor led to a situation where the editor said
255:
235:
186:
318:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
625:
466:
181:
132:
556:
303:
585:
416:
545:
200:
508:
98:"I won't revert more than once unless it convinces someone else I'm right". You agreed not to do that any more, and you did.
19:
647:
482:
159:
153:
47:, you made three edits which at least partially removed the same disputed material each time from the lead section (
158:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
540:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
339:
263:
164:
124:
84:
513:
120:
636:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.
537:
525:
475:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.
567:
391:
376:
549:
111:
99:
74:
61:
241:
of the article- that I thought were good faith work on the page. The other editor involved said
231:
643:
478:
361:
312:
289:
541:
250:
57:
563:
387:
372:
246:
658:
596:
571:
518:
493:
427:
395:
380:
365:
347:
293:
271:
104:
92:
66:
536:
Hello, Geographyinitiative. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
652:
487:
357:
328:
285:
442:
On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
611:
On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
260:
Knowledge (XXG):Reference_desk/Archives/Humanities/2023 June 9#Outer
Manchuria
256:
Knowledge (XXG):Reference_desk/Humanities#Tibet's
Northern Boundary in 1820
44:
532:
262:. Oh man, what a joy it was to be editing again on Knowledge (XXG)!
230:
35:), I made very clear that a condition of your unblock was that
595:
426:
144:
300:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
245:. I think my recent edits both on Knowledge (XXG) and my
320:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
43:, and you stated your agreement to these conditions. At
335:
242:
214:
210:
204:
195:
191:
177:
173:
169:
80:
54:
51:
48:
33:
152:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
562:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge (XXG).
408:August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
258:. Check out this big thread too, from last month:
334:result was approved by the other editor who said
32:Well, that's unfortunate. When I unblocked you (
555:If the page has already been deleted, you can
8:
544:, so if you wish to retain the page, please
336:"the last edit seems benign, even preferred"
243:"the last edit seems benign, even preferred"
81:"the last edit seems benign, even preferred"
118:
37:you may not revert any edit more than once
236:I am once again asking for your support.
20:Wiktionary:User talk:Geographyinitiative
503:Please break your texts into paragraphs
467:Join the conversations on our talkpage
356:do not speak for the blocking admin).
40:
36:
7:
552:that it be moved to your userspace.
617:Interested in taking part? You can
559:so you can continue working on it.
448:Interested in taking part? You can
14:
531:
509:Talk:Russian Manchuria (Russia)
1:
659:02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
577:March 2024 GAN backlog drive
572:13:05, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
247:longer history on Wiktionary
519:21:31, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
156:, who declined the request.
674:
614:Barnstars will be awarded.
462:Other ways to participate:
445:Barnstars will be awarded.
438:August 2023 Backlog Drive:
635:
607:March 2024 Backlog Drive:
594:
494:05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
474:
460:
425:
422:August 2023 Backlog Drive
396:01:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
381:14:16, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
366:10:26, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
348:09:26, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
304:guide to appealing blocks
294:06:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
272:00:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
105:23:06, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
93:22:57, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
67:22:27, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
58:guide to appealing blocks
591:March 2024 Backlog Drive
586:Good article nominations
417:Good article nominations
343:
267:
128:
88:
557:request it be undeleted
600:
431:
238:
149:
599:
430:
234:
201:change block settings
148:
340:Geographyinitiative
264:Geographyinitiative
165:Geographyinitiative
125:Geographyinitiative
85:Geographyinitiative
626:ask questions here
601:
524:Concern regarding
432:
239:
150:
640:
639:
500:
499:
251:Wikimedia Commons
136:
123:comment added by
103:
65:
665:
655:
592:
581:
580:
538:Draft:Uzbel Pass
535:
526:Draft:Uzbel Pass
516:
490:
423:
412:
411:
332:
317:
311:
220:
218:
207:
189:
187:deleted contribs
147:
115:
102:
78:
64:
39:, and also that
18:My talkpage is:
673:
672:
668:
667:
666:
664:
663:
662:
653:
590:
579:
529:
514:
505:
488:
421:
410:
326:
323:
315:
309:
308:, then use the
297:
274:
208:
198:
184:
167:
160:blocking policy
145:
109:
72:
30:
25:
12:
11:
5:
671:
669:
638:
637:
633:
632:
631:
630:
615:
612:
603:
602:
593:
578:
575:
542:may be deleted
528:
522:
504:
501:
498:
497:
472:
471:
470:
469:
458:
457:
456:
455:
446:
443:
434:
433:
424:
409:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
371:same mistake.
298:
281:
277:Decline reason
229:
225:Request reason
222:
143:
142:
141:
140:
139:
138:
137:
29:
26:
24:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
670:
661:
660:
657:
656:
649:
645:
634:
628:
627:
622:
621:
616:
613:
610:
609:
608:
605:
604:
598:
589:
587:
583:
582:
576:
574:
573:
569:
565:
560:
558:
553:
551:
547:
543:
539:
534:
527:
523:
521:
520:
517:
510:
502:
496:
495:
492:
491:
484:
480:
473:
468:
465:
464:
463:
459:
453:
452:
447:
444:
441:
440:
439:
436:
435:
429:
420:
418:
414:
413:
407:
397:
393:
389:
384:
383:
382:
378:
374:
369:
368:
367:
363:
359:
354:
353:
352:
349:
345:
341:
337:
330:
325:
324:
322:
321:
314:
307:
305:
296:
295:
291:
287:
280:
278:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
252:
248:
244:
237:
233:
228:
226:
221:
216:
212:
206:
202:
197:
193:
188:
183:
179:
178:global blocks
175:
174:active blocks
171:
166:
161:
157:
155:
154:administrator
134:
130:
126:
122:
113:
112:Seraphimblade
108:
107:
106:
101:
100:Seraphimblade
96:
95:
94:
90:
86:
82:
76:
75:Seraphimblade
71:
70:
69:
68:
63:
62:Seraphimblade
59:
55:
52:
49:
46:
42:
38:
34:
27:
23:
21:
16:
651:
641:
624:
620:sign up here
618:
606:
584:
561:
554:
530:
506:
486:
476:
461:
451:sign up here
449:
437:
415:
350:
319:
301:
299:
282:
276:
275:
224:
223:
196:creation log
163:
151:
119:— Preceding
31:
17:
564:FireflyBot
388:Megathonic
351:(Modified)
192:filter log
548:again or
373:Folly Mox
302:read the
211:checkuser
170:block log
28:Reblocked
182:contribs
133:contribs
121:unsigned
45:Sakhalin
550:request
546:edit it
313:unblock
205:unblock
654:buidhe
489:buidhe
358:331dot
329:331dot
286:331dot
306:first
568:talk
392:talk
377:talk
362:talk
344:talk
290:talk
268:talk
249:and
129:talk
89:talk
623:or
507:On
215:log
162:).
650:)
646:·
570:)
515:NM
485:)
481:·
394:)
379:)
364:)
346:)
316:}}
310:{{
292:)
279::
270:)
227::
209:•
203:•
199:•
194:•
190:•
185:•
180:•
176:•
172:•
135:)
131:•
91:)
60:.
53:,
50:,
648:c
644:t
642:(
629:.
588:|
566:(
483:c
479:t
477:(
454:.
419:|
390:(
375:(
360:(
342:(
331::
327:@
288:(
266:(
219:)
217:)
213:(
168:(
127:(
114::
110:@
87:(
77::
73:@
22:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.