User talk:Geometry guy/Archive 27

1010:

much mind as I have the sense that GAR is being looked after by Gguy, and so is in capable hands. There are other areas around Wiki where one or more individuals are active and take responsibility (with or without titles) and that is as it should be. Like Gguy I am slightly against the notion of formalising that process if there is no need. If GAR was in need of more organisation or attention and nobody was stepping forward to do the work, then having some form of formal position in which somebody was encouraged into the role would be appropriate. I will look into passing by once a month or so to see how things are going, just in order to help out now and again. Meanwhile, I think many of us already regard Gguy as the person most responsible within the GA project, and as the voice (and ethos) of the project. He has the unseen title of Director of Good Articles, but more important than that he has the respect of people who are aware of what he does. Let's get on with improving the 'pedia and leave formal titles and positions out of it unless needed. The bureaucracy involved in setting up a formal position, and having annual elections, etc, is more than it is worth. Gguy is our go-to guy for as long as he is willing, and everyone is encouraged to get involved in all aspects of the GA project in the true open spirit of Knowledge (XXG).

563:. The Malvern GA was reviewed by a very strict but extremely fair reviewer - which is the way it should be. Other admins, not you, however have expressed what appears to be a view that the article may eventually not have been entirely correctly passed, but I would stress that I have no intentions, at least for a long time, of preparing the article for FA. If other members of the project wish to do so much sooner, that is of course fine, but I will probably not participate. I do however remember you saying that you would be prepared to go to Malvern on an investigative excursion, so I assume you are near the area. Any help you can give therefore would be most appreciated, and you do not have to be a specialist in UK geography. Although some Wikipedians insist that editors should only work on articles about the countries they live in, the opposite seems to reflect the current facts.we are mainly, a Malvern physicist who lives and works in Switzerland, a retired linguist/educationalist from Malvern who lives and works most of the time in Thailand, and a former Malvern RRE scientist from the 1950s who lives in America. You are not a member of the 1128:. I made some edits to the article, left some comments for some more minor edits to be done (build the lead and clarify some technical terms), and put it on hold. The nominator and main contributor reverted my edits and has asked me to fail the review as he is not happy with me editing the article. I have tried to enter into discussion, but he appears unwilling. It may be a case that someone else coming in and taking over would ease the problem. The work needed to be done is quite small, and I (well, anyone) could do it in less than 30 minutes. Seems odd to fail under those circumstances, but also seems inappropriate to make somebody unhappy, especially as they have been fairly productive so far. What do you think? Would you be willing to take it over. or shall I ask someone else? Or just for a general second opinion? 1796:

there may be later views or refutations, or the author may have changed their mind. Conversely, if you write "Gomme suggested..." instead of "Gomme suggests...", it draws attention to the time of writing, and may even cast doubt upon the currency of the information. Secondly, phrases such as "Pevsner states..." or "Gomme suggests..." are typically shorthand for something like "The cited book by Pevsner states..." or "Gomme's work suggests..." The attribution is there to ensure readers know that the view is a notable opinion. Knowledge (XXG) itself should neither endorse nor cast doubt upon such opinions.

945:

those who have titled roles (who are typically exemplary Wikipedians IMO), such titles are not for me in the spirit of Knowledge (XXG). "Authority" has two distinct meanings: it is the meaning connected to expertise, rather than status, that I think matters here. We value other editors for the quality of their contributions, and turn to them for advice and other input because they have proven to be helpful or have valuable experience.

39: 1922: 367:! While the article you link is an uncompromising caricature at his expense, the question "Howcum aa have aal this munni?" might apply. Incidently I now own a bona fide Mulholland Drive Dvd. "What, you didn't before?" you may ask. Yes, it just goes to show how stupid I can be that I rented it to watch many times before I realized "Duh, G'guy, you can buy it for almost the same price!". Oh well. 93: 775:

appealing prospect for users who also need the tools, but who are too afraid to come forward. I trust that you will allow me to poach on your experience from time to time, and I look forward to working together with you as a fellow admin, and perhaps meeting up with you in Malvern when I get over to the UK. Regards, --

244:, I'm sure you realised that my mention of the mouse was a literary device. And it worked. The problem is that the people list has grown considerably since the article passed its review a year ago, and it has been hinted, with many exaggerated interpretations of policy, that the reviewer may have improperly awarded the page its GA badge. -- 290:" as the criteria are unsourced. Even sourcing the criteria to English Heritage may not be helpful, as they decide how the criteria are applied. If Franklin D. Roosevelt, aged 7, resided in Malvern for a significant period, there should be reliable secondary sources which say so, and our readers deserve to know about them. 1353:

the confusingly entangled WikiProject and community assessments: there is too much inertia in the system. I just politely point out, when appropriate, that "It's barely C-Class according to WikiProject Mongolian Graphic Literature" is not, on its own, an argument that an article does not meet the GA criteria.

2093:

I happened to see this on my watchlist. I can't speak for the developers, but my sense is that (1) they generally feel like the template limits are quite high, so that even if the limits are being cut in half they are still adequate for typical articles and (2) because there are so many things to do,

812:

was nominated for Good Article status back in January, but was delisted. I know you contributed to it, so I just wanted to say that I have worked on the article extensively and I think I have resolved the problems that stopped the article for achieving GA status. The reference formatting was an issue

583:

I am not aware of any misunderstandings. If I believed the article deviated significantly from the GA criteria, I would have opened a reassessment, and this has nothing to do with me being an admin: any Wikipedian can do that. Instead I decided to help spruce the article up a bit. I have no intention

259:

Hi. Your comments are among the most welcome, objective, helpful, and polite that have ever been posed to that page. I don't know what, if any, personal connections you have to Malvern, but I do hope you will continue to support the article with your kind advice. I was surprised to learn however that

2107:

To make things worse, the problem is with the parser code in Mediawiki, which is particularly complex and which has to be extremely efficient. If more people voted on the bug, that might help, but to make the voting more compelling it would be nice for someone to compile a list of the pages that are

1572:

I will continue to encourage better wording if I can. I was deeply depressed on Monday (14th), thinking that my flawed comments would make no difference, and that Knowledge (XXG) was heading towards becoming a dumbed-down repository. I got involved in this encyclopedia because of its aspirations to

1231:

Lol! Thanks guys for your kind words here and above. You made me laugh and smile - which is pretty good going after the day I've had IRL! I shall be adding the initials SDoGAbGAhnSDsTiJaJ to my signature henceforth, obviously ;). In return, and in the generous spirit of GA :), may I cordially invite

1029:

I think Gguy and others have done a superb job in keeping GA egalitarian and remarkably free from bureaucracy; the project is very fortunate in the calibre of its membership. To my mind the main argument for having formal positions is to ensure continuity of function, and as you say while continuity

944:

I have thought about whether GA or GAR should have a director or directors, but have generally rejected the idea for several related reasons. Knowledge (XXG) is not a bureaucracy, but a volunteer project: we all work on things which interest us and the remuneration is lousy :). With no disrespect to

1725:

Well, it made it, largely thanks to your intervention. Also thanks for the latest edits. Just a question on style. I note that you have changed Gomme's comments to the present tense, even though he is dead. I have never been clear on the convention about this. It worries me when I say "Pevsner

1398:

Sorry I pipped you to the post with the DYK hook! I should have said last night that you can always suggest an ALT hook, but I guess I was a bit tired. Anyway the hook's already been "approved" with the comment "An interesting hook", so maybe I can do something right! I repeat my thanks for your

1352:

Thanks for the links. I don't hold out much hope making progress against community inertia on en-wiki: it takes years! Consider for example, issues such as the GA symbol (introduced after years of acrimonious debate), and the ongoing discussions about Pending Changes. I've given up trying to reform

1009:

I have to confess that I don't have GAR in my regular scope. Sometimes I turn up there because in my wanderings I note an article is being reassessed, and will look at that particular GAR, and then at others on the GAR page, adding comments or closing the GAR if applicable. I don't generally pay it

695:

It's possible to install (but not save) the PR template on an article talk page, to view it in preview mode, and to click through and fill in the rest of the form without remembering to save on the article talk page. I think that's what I must have done, and I think that's the process that accounts

615:

I think it's probably best to wait and see what Brian comes up with. He's an archivist, and an author of books on the history of Malvern, and if he can provide a copy of the letter, that's all we need to know. I don't think there's much to be gained in bombarding him with mail from

510:

You are entitled to your beliefs. In mathematics, "map" nearly always means some sort of function, and with a prefix such as "linear" or "continuous" there is no ambiguity whatsoever. The use of "transformation" as a synonym for "function" or "map" is slowly dying out, as the word is long and prone

445:

Yes, some are on commons, some not: scroll down from the image for the "commons" banner (or check at the top whether the file is redlinked). It may be best to start with the articles on Knowledge (XXG), as there is always a danger that when you label an image as copyrighted, someone will delete it:

1795:

I thus share your hesitation about using the present tense in attributions, but have a couple of suggestions which may help. First, ask the question "Is it relevant to the discussion/article when this material was written?" It might be: the views being attributed may reflect the views of the time;

1509:

Thanks Elen, for responding positively like this, despite the many things going on right now! I can't promise it will make everyone happy, but apart from the redlink (which will soon be fixed I'm sure!) your revised version looks much better to me. In particular, the new version takes on board the

988:

Darn, EyeSerene saw through my unwillingness to commit to endless janatorial work! :) Fortunately, subsequent to comments made here, Wizardman and SilkTork have been closing some GAR discussions. They are excellent "GAR coordinators" in every sense, including EyeSerene's, and I hope that many more

567:

project, but if you hail from, or live in the area and intend to become involve with the entire suite of Malvern articles, I would like to extend the invitation for you to consider joining it. However, going to the Malvern Museum on behalf of Knowledge (XXG) might not add much to

948:

I have taken a long term interest in the stability, reliability and integrity of GA. It is that interest that underpins my involvement at GAR, in that when a nominator or reviewer has a bad experience, or something goes wrong, I want to sort it out. I would rather encourage others to do likewise.

490:

I believe you jumped the gun on changing the page title to "Linear map". The most commonly recognized name is "linear transformation" and this is the most distinctive name. The name "map" means all kinds of things; "transformation" is not used for nearly as many things, in fact, hardly any. See

2121:

What would help more is for someone to have both the time and expertise to submit a code patch that fixes the problem. I might be able to try that this summer, but I won't have time to do it before June, and I don't know if I would even be able to fix it then. My memory is that I researched this

1792:

common tense mistakes I find at GA involve writing "in the moment", i.e., from the perspective of the time: "he would later receive an Oscar" is a typical example; it should be "he later received an Oscar". Writing "in the moment" is common in journalism, but is inappropriate for an encyclopedia.

537:

I agree that "map" is used in graph theory in a different sense. I don't discuss my credentials as part of an argument, even though I am a professional mathematician with plenty of teaching experience (including linear algebra). Anything which any editor says can be considered as just an opinion

2046:

Thanks -- that was crystal clear and extremely helpful. A different question: I followed the MediaWiki link and voted for that bug; do you think it would be sensible to suggest that others who see this as a problem also do the same? I don't know anything about the culture of MediaWiki, and if

1791:

Knowledge (XXG) articles should be written in the present of the reader, something which I have started referring to as the "encyclopedic present". Ironically, this typically means using the simple past tense, since most articles discuss things that happened before the time of reading! The most

282:

Thank you for your kind remarks. I did indeed appreciate that the "mouse click" was metaphorical, but it created a wrong impression. Also, I do not regard any good faith GA review as "improper": GA is a process that encourages and assesses article improvement incrementally and no one review can

774:

Hi Geo guy! I'm not sending out thankspam, but I would like to personally thank you for your support and for the kind words. What I learned on this RfA will also go towards continuing to mentor others, especially the younger editors, and participating in the campaign to make RfA a more

976:

grand doyen of the GA WikiProject, Gguy is as always being modest :) It's an interesting point though. Giving someone a title is often a simple way of getting them to commit to a role; normally the sort of janitorial work that otherwise probably wouldn't get done (or would fall to a very few

790:

Congratulations on your successful request for adminship, and many thanks for your personal message. I also look forward to working with you and hope that appointments of good admins will encourage better practice. You are more than welcome to consult me on any issue, bearing in mind that my

599:

I hope your kind friends in Malvern will not consider it rude that Michael and myself have been asking questions about the letter: this is now curiosity driven as much as anything else! It is a pity that Aldwyn Tower is no longer a hotel, as that greatly diminishes the chances of there being

568:

the article as it stands. If the museum has the original letter, Brian is a very kind and helpfull fellow, a family friend for 30 years, and I'm hoping he will send us a scan or a photo of it. I'm as curious as you are to see what he comes up with. I will be in Malvern in April. --

591:

Insisting that Wikipedians only work on articles about countries they live in is daft! This is a volunteer project and everyone is free to work on whatever interests them! Personally, I quite like contributing to topics I know very little about because (1) I learn something, and (2) I

646:

for a few weeks, and I could show you around. You'll also meet someone who is the very opposite of a child hater! Malvern has a fine 11th C. priory church, some of the best food in the county, and still plenty more to dig up for Knowledge (XXG) Malvern articles. Regards,

756:

I've seen the consequences of this mistake myself a few times. CBM has a clever idea to use the difference between the time of the last revision to the talk page and the current time to ensure the PR template is saved before it is used. I don't have a better idea than that.

1258:

Um... "Supreme Director of Good Articles but GA has no Supreme Directors so This is Just a Joke"? Re the other, I'll try to take a look but I can't promise anything (my employers quite unreasonably expect me to produce some work occasionally in return for my salary).

1468:", an experience which can be very frustrating to others. So I have simply proposed an alternative wording at the Workshop: criticism is welcome, as it may not be ideal from multiple perspectives, but I think it improves upon the principle receiving current support. 918:

You are welcome, and thank you for raising the reassessment and thus helping to maintain the integrity of GA article quality. Any uninvolved editor can close a reassessment (much like an AfD), but it seems that if I don't do it, it often doesn't get done!

630:

I think you may have misunderstood: I was not proposing to ask more questions or send any emails. I have rephrased my comment above for clarity. I agree we should wait and see what he can find - and then ask whether it is all we need/would like to know :)

1874:. You need to elaborate the story (which you summarize in the lead) in the body of the article, "Show don't tell" is an excellent principle in my view, and your comments about the market should flow easily into the article if you apply that principle. 616:

all of us - he has the diffs, and he can follow the talk page if he wishes. Aldwyn Tower has not been a hotel for a very long time, not, I believe, in my lifetime (61 years) so it's highly unlikely that any records are extant.

846:

can provide detailed peer review comments on the GAN review page, then I am willing to act as "lead reviewer" and make the final assessment as to whether the article meets the criteria. Please let me know, and I will start the review page.

1741:

It's a common literary convention to always use the present tense, based I suppose on the fact that it's still what he says through his writing and the writing is not a corpse. In fact it's sometimes called the "literary present tense".

1606:

My instinctive feeling as a Wikipedian (rather than as a mathematician) is to try to say less rather than more, Arbcom does not need to rule on everything, as long as it provides sufficient support for its resolution of the dispute.

1510:

point that the main danger of synthesis is an unsourced conclusion, rather than an unsourced derivation (this does not imply that unsourced derivations are approved!). Also quoting policy, rather than paraphrasing it, is a good idea.

1686:

That would certainly be appreciated! I don't mean to be a pest, especially since you've already been helpful in your comments, but I think the article is very nearly ready for GA and am eager to do what it takes to get it there. —

900: 522:

Please tell me how you know all that! I don't see it in my experience. (Just one example: The word "map" is often used in a specialized meaning without any distinguishing adjective.) Thank you for your expected explanation.

696:

for similar glitches that we see from time-to-time at PR. This is a form of operator error rather than a flaw in the template design, but maybe a guru could make a doofus-proof template that would not work unless saved first.

161:

Would it be possible for you to give us a headups of what still needs fixing, I'm sure the neutrality issues and references have been fixed I've also addressed the injuries issue and will address the reception shortly.

1895:

on how best to treat these nuances in our policy. It defies an easy answer, because of the differences in sources between different disciplines, and I think the discussion would benefit from your insight. Thank you,

121: 54: 2073:

may have a better idea. Greater awareness that template limits issues affect content review processes (including FAC, upon which substantial main page content is based) may carry more weight than numbers of votes.

1849:

What would it take to take this article to GA? I'm not so concerned with the hacking out prose and format, but with content. Any thoughts on what is needed for an "industry overview"? Or models of GAs that are?

1056: 58:. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. If you have any questions, you can leave a note on my talk page. Have a great day. – 52:. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, you can find the interview questions 1198:

I hereby award Geometry guy the chair of Supreme Director of Good Articles. I hope you find it comfy. (I got it from Marks & Sparks, so if you don't like the colour you can always get it changed).

587:

I don't have any personal connection with Malvern (beyond being English and living in the UK!), nor do I live particularly close, but I have never visited the town, and I think it would make a pleasant

1646:

I made on Amadscientist's talk page. No need for you to comment or anything, I just try to give people a heads up when I make a comment on somebody else's talk page that mentions them. Thanks! —

686:

Hi Geometry guy, thanks for updating the PR archive and page. I have noticed that occasionally there are PRs which have no PR template on the article talk page. This happened recently on a PR

1334:

serious when it will be about time to implement "ideas" in each respective wikis as we will need every contributors to give a good push against inherent communities inertia and conservatism.

1539:

An intellectual/political figure described a political organization as being like "the French—a nation of anarchists that want to be told what to do!"; c.f. "The Anarchists' Convention" by

1891:

Hi Geometry guy, I know you have thought carefully about the nuances distinguishing primary and secondary sources in a scientific context in the past. There is a discussion underway at

416:

Sure: step one is to fix the copyright notices/licensing information for the images, here or on commons, according to where the image is stored. Do you have a commons account?

1592:

Thank you guys all for your help on this. I'm sure we can work it out if not to everyone's complete satisfaction, at least so it doesn't cause massive unintended consequences.

264:

in the UK. As the photo is not a fake - I took it myself - I don't think any further references are necessary. I've removed the {{cn}} tag. I hope you don't mind. Regards, --

1573:

freely document the "sum of human knowledge". Yet I find myself increasingly spending more time arguing for the ideal than contributing to it. I am not happy about that.

1726:

says", and even more "Ormerod says" (Ormerod was a Cheshire historian who died in 1873). When should I use the present tense, and do we ever use the past? Cheers. --

1241: 642:

I had of course misunderstood, and please accept my apologies. If you are really keen on a visit to Malvern, you could wait until April when I get home to

977:

committed and proactive individuals). I'm willing to bet that if the project did use titles like 'GAR coordinator' there would be a wider pool of active closers.

2020: 1853:

I was thinking some more overall market sizing and segmentation, and then some on methods. Maybe a bit more on pricing or other aspects of the economics.

1414:

No worries. My hook would have been much the same, so it would be silly to provide an alternative. I'm glad the DYK was accepted so readily and positively.

1320: 446:

such images are only allowed if they are being used in an article under the "fair use" provision. This relates to the second step, which is to provide

218:

I'm still mulling over the problem, and am not prepared to propose a solution, but if it's clearer to you, then please feel free to jump in.

401:

Sorry, off to Ottawa, just getting back. Can you help me with the images in NIF? I'll do the work if you can give me some specific pointers.

822: 2060: 2036: 817:

has agreed to peer review it either today or tomorrow, but she will not carry out a full review due to her being a tad unfamiliar with the

1118: 2162: 2056: 2032: 821:. Would it be possible for you to conduct a full review, as I am desperate to get it into GA status? The article is nominated under the 818: 2181: 1699: 1658: 1100: 1071: 331:

Much as I'd like to help, there are plenty of other things occupying my limited wikitime at the moment, so don't hold your breath.

2047:

canvassing for bug votes is regarded as poorly as canvassing for RfAs is here then I'd rather not suggest it. What do you think?

989:

editors will discover that it is actually quite fun to contribute at GAR, because all sorts of interesting articles appear there.

288:

In order to be eligible for an English Heritage blue plaque, a figure must... have resided in a locality for a significant period

596:

to rely upon RSS in my contributions, which I think is good for the article. However I also work on topics where I am an expert.

661:

That's a kind invitation: we can discuss it by email; I hope I will not be too busy to make a short visit while you are there.

1974:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

1313: 1310: 427:

I do. Have these been moved to the Commons? (I find it oddly difficult to know). Just some or all? If it's a subset, perhaps

77:

Thanks for asking: you may regret it! I hope you will be able to produce an interesting and balanced article on the project.

1903: 1458: 348: 1788:", which we use to write plot summaries because we are summarizing the experience of reading the book or watching the film. 1368:

Having been part of the previous discussions, i have a sort "déjà vu" feeling with the current ones. Discussions is always

1316: 930:

Have you ever thought of establishing yourself as the director of Good Article reassessments or something along the lines?

1928: 1309:

You questioned what can be done. I would point you to read a lot of the last year brainstorming session discussions like

1188: 366:

Billy Ray found himself in a world he did not understand in Mulholland drive - nothing new there then</b'dum-tish: -->

1675:

Thanks for posting - I got distracted from my read-through by several other things, but will return to the article now.

241: 813:

as well as the balance, but both have been improved considerably. I have nominated the article for GA status again and

2186: 1704: 1663: 1623: 1597: 1492: 1105: 1076: 868: 831: 1719: 1125: 2166: 2145: 1975: 1961: 1750: 1563: 1454: 1051: 1043: 462: 395: 2209: 436: 406: 1897: 1141: 2004: 1812: 1767: 1731: 1404: 878:

Great. I've started the review page: I'll fill in the table when I get time and as the peer review progresses.

185:

I won't re-review in depth until Sunday, but will look at the article again and add comments as appropriate.

2156: 2052: 2028: 1735: 1643: 863: 826: 234: 313:

for what seems to be a rather astounding (to me, at least) assertion about sourcing requirements for GAs?

212: 2076: 1921: 1876: 1823: 1798: 1677: 1619: 1609: 1593: 1575: 1515: 1488: 1470: 1416: 1355: 1283: 1246: 1149: 991: 951: 921: 880: 849: 793: 759: 663: 633: 606: 540: 513: 467: 452: 418: 384: 369: 333: 321: 292: 223: 204: 187: 142: 79: 17: 2069:

I don't either, but it is likely to be a culture of trying to maximize the utility of limited resources.

325: 2176: 1989: 1933: 1747: 1694: 1653: 1549: 1440: 1095: 1066: 843: 814: 1971: 1399:

input into the impasse, and will do a bit of work on the article, I hope, later today. Best wishes. --

1300: 2023:? There's a question there for a template expert, and I know you are expert in that area. Thanks -- 903:. Now while I wanted the reassessment to be closed earlier, its still good to have it closed. Thanks. 935: 908: 432: 402: 1892: 1030:

is provided by the gentle encouragement and example of people like Gguy there's no need for titles.

2000: 1808: 1763: 1727: 1400: 1381: 1342: 740: 716: 2152: 2048: 2024: 1949: 1940: 1281:, which sufficed to close the reassessment. Thanks to you both for your help and offers of help. 1209: 1172: 1138: 1020: 131: 104: 65: 1376:. It took one year for the Foundation to make something of the previous round of discussions. -- 564: 1059:. Please take a look and shoot me a response at your earliest convenience. Thanks very much! — 1785: 780: 652: 621: 573: 314: 269: 249: 219: 1871: 194:(PS. I think KimvdLinde must have accidentally hit the rollback button on her/his watchlist.) 2171: 1985: 1689: 1648: 1513:

I hope both mathematics editors and arbitrators will appreciate the merits of this version.

1237: 1090: 1061: 528: 500: 310: 169: 447: 2192: 2134: 2080: 2064: 2040: 2008: 1993: 1907: 1880: 1864: 1827: 1816: 1802: 1771: 1753: 1743: 1710: 1681: 1669: 1627: 1613: 1601: 1579: 1567: 1519: 1496: 1474: 1420: 1408: 1385: 1359: 1346: 1287: 1265: 1253: 1226: 1212: 1175: 1153: 1111: 1082: 1036: 1023: 995: 983: 955: 939: 931: 925: 912: 904: 884: 873: 853: 836: 797: 784: 763: 750: 726: 667: 656: 637: 625: 610: 584:

to bring the article to FA, but if others wish to do so, then I am likely willing to help.

577: 544: 532: 517: 504: 492: 471: 456: 440: 422: 410: 388: 373: 360: 356: 337: 296: 273: 253: 227: 191: 179: 146: 135: 108: 83: 69: 120:, has move the publication date to this coming Monday, 21 February. The final draft has 1842: 1377: 1338: 1260: 1221: 1031: 978: 736: 712: 687: 643: 379: 38: 2129: 1860: 1240:

and it is possible that it now meets the criteria, as some article editors assert at

1202: 1165: 1131: 1013: 126: 117: 99: 60: 1965: 2199: 1465: 825:. If you can help, I very much appreciate it. If you can't, no worries. Thanks. :) 776: 648: 617: 569: 265: 261: 245: 2019:

Hi -- if you have time, would you mind taking a look at the note I just posted at

1437:

I proposed an alternative on the WP project mathematics talk page. Best regards,

1540: 809: 705: 524: 496: 283:

capture every issue; I fixed quite a few things myself on a single read-through.

163: 2122:

problem in source code in detail once, and I didn't see any simple fix. — Carl

1958:

You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page

286:

As for the Blue plaques, readers only have Knowledge (XXG)'s word for it that "

116:

Thanks for participating in the interview. Just a heads up that section editor

484: 352: 1187: 215:

is doubtless how the article came to the attention of the tagging editor.

124:. Please go through it to check for any inaccuracies, etc. Thanks again. – 2125: 2070: 1856: 1272:

Hmmm... maybe I should have left it all caps to keep you guessing longer!

732: 1278: 1233: 1916: 33: 690:

opened and when I asked him about it, this is what he said.

1945:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 538:

until they supply reliable secondary sources to back it up.

378:

PS. "Being in an incomprehensible world" reminded me of the

1088:

Thanks, and thanks again for your very helpful comments! —

382:, which I'm sure you've seen, but it still makes me laugh. 1434:

Elen twice asked for suggestions for alternative wording.

1372:, putting in practice the results of those discussions is 600:

something like a guestbook which might pin down precisely

431:

the first place to start, deciding on a single location?

207:(and the section above, and elsewhere), which relates to 1147:

I will take a look this weekend, if it is not too late.

260:

you do not appear to know about the extremely exacting

1999:

Nearly made the 5K, but not quite. A pity. Cheers. --

1484: 791:

experience varies considerably depending on the issue!

559:

I would like to rectify a possible misunderstanding

208: 2210:

User talk:Mrs_muffet#Netball (Geometry guy's comments)

2169:

GAR or review comments that have already been made. —

1483:

I've responded on the workshop page, and come up with

1277:

SilkTork kindly provided excellent review comments on

1274:

I won't elaborate further on the associated in-joke ;)

1049:

Just wanted to let you know I've made some changes to

560: 1232:

either or both of you (or any TPS) to take a look at

701:

Does this seem like anything that could be done for

1321:strategy:Wikimedia Movement Strategic Plan Summary 862:She said she will do that. Thank you for helping. 344:The root of all evil, according to Billy Ray Cyrus 2165:) has declined to participate any further in the 1236:? This article improved both during and after an 1190:File:Gold Medal 2018 Classic Directors Chair.jpg 1426: 1124:There's a small problem with the GA review of 8: 1464:Organizing academics is often described as " 1270:How the blazes did you deduce that, Holmes? 44:"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on 1427:MHP: Elen's request for alternative wording 2094:(1) makes this sort of bug a low priority. 1870:The most obvious immediate issue to me is 1937:was updated with a fact from the article 1746:is a good, straightforward explanation. 203:I'd be happy to have you keep an eye on 240:Hi. I would like to thank you for your 2015:Collapsible comments template question 1055:and responded to your comments at the 899:I just read your comment on the GAR's 1314:strategy:Task force/Reader Conversion 1311:strategy:Task force/Wikipedia Quality 7: 1327:conclusions over those discussions. 1317:strategy:Task force/Community Health 90: 1117: 262:criteria for the Blue Plaque system 1242:the ongoing community reassessment 1119:Talk:St Mary's Church, Astbury/GA1 140:Thanks for all your careful work! 24: 1194:Supreme Director of Good Articles 461:I have made a first attempt with 205:User_talk:WhatamIdoing#Talkback_2 1920: 91: 37: 1784:A closely related term is the " 1718: 1546:The text is a big improvement. 823:Theatre, Film and Drama section 1807:Thanks, that's helpful too. -- 895:Daytona International Speedway 380:Mulholland Drive Support Group 1: 2202:? Your comments to Laura Hale 1956:first name was a family joke? 1887:Primary and secondary sources 1642:Just wanted to make sure you 804:GA - David Yates (March 2011) 668:21:05, 27 February 2011 (UTC) 657:19:59, 27 February 2011 (UTC) 638:19:17, 27 February 2011 (UTC) 626:18:24, 27 February 2011 (UTC) 611:18:02, 27 February 2011 (UTC) 578:07:07, 27 February 2011 (UTC) 545:18:02, 27 February 2011 (UTC) 533:03:12, 27 February 2011 (UTC) 518:15:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC) 505:07:28, 26 February 2011 (UTC) 472:00:02, 27 February 2011 (UTC) 463:File:NIF beamline diagram.png 457:00:26, 23 February 2011 (UTC) 441:11:49, 22 February 2011 (UTC) 423:00:48, 22 February 2011 (UTC) 411:17:37, 21 February 2011 (UTC) 389:00:08, 18 February 2011 (UTC) 374:23:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC) 361:22:13, 17 February 2011 (UTC) 338:00:07, 17 February 2011 (UTC) 326:22:06, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 305:Post Valentine's Day Wikilove 297:00:50, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 274:23:49, 15 February 2011 (UTC) 254:21:26, 14 February 2011 (UTC) 228:18:05, 13 February 2011 (UTC) 147:00:09, 17 February 2011 (UTC) 136:23:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 304: 211:at a recently promoted GA. 192:22:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC) 180:04:08, 8 February 2011 (UTC) 109:07:53, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 84:23:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC) 70:04:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC) 48:for an upcoming edition of 2227: 2193:20:37, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 2167:The Incredible Melting Man 2146:The Incredible Melting Man 2135:01:19, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 2081:00:26, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 2065:13:27, 27 March 2011 (UTC) 2041:14:41, 26 March 2011 (UTC) 2009:08:08, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 1994:08:03, 24 March 2011 (UTC) 1913:DYK for Andor Harvey Gomme 1908:16:39, 18 March 2011 (UTC) 1881:22:40, 16 March 2011 (UTC) 1865:22:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 1828:20:19, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 1817:19:08, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 1803:18:37, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 1772:14:38, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 1762:Thanks, that's helpful. -- 1754:13:49, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 1736:09:41, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 1711:21:15, 20 March 2011 (UTC) 1682:20:21, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 1670:02:33, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 1628:00:26, 17 March 2011 (UTC) 1614:00:12, 17 March 2011 (UTC) 1602:23:51, 16 March 2011 (UTC) 1580:23:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC) 1568:09:33, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 1520:23:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC) 1497:23:00, 14 March 2011 (UTC) 1475:21:56, 14 March 2011 (UTC) 1459:15:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC) 1421:21:56, 14 March 2011 (UTC) 1409:09:28, 14 March 2011 (UTC) 1386:08:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC) 1360:21:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC) 1347:20:36, 12 March 2011 (UTC) 1288:20:28, 12 March 2011 (UTC) 1266:14:11, 11 March 2011 (UTC) 1254:21:14, 10 March 2011 (UTC) 1227:11:09, 10 March 2011 (UTC) 1213:09:44, 10 March 2011 (UTC) 1176:09:07, 10 March 2011 (UTC) 1052:The Incredible Melting Man 1044:The Incredible Melting Man 1037:11:25, 10 March 2011 (UTC) 1024:09:38, 10 March 2011 (UTC) 1720:St Mary's Church, Astbury 1154:23:31, 9 March 2011 (UTC) 1142:18:29, 7 March 2011 (UTC) 1126:St Mary's Church, Astbury 1112:19:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC) 1083:06:33, 7 March 2011 (UTC) 996:23:41, 9 March 2011 (UTC) 984:11:03, 7 March 2011 (UTC) 956:18:58, 6 March 2011 (UTC) 940:18:29, 6 March 2011 (UTC) 926:18:18, 6 March 2011 (UTC) 913:18:11, 6 March 2011 (UTC) 885:19:54, 6 March 2011 (UTC) 874:19:09, 6 March 2011 (UTC) 854:18:10, 6 March 2011 (UTC) 837:17:29, 6 March 2011 (UTC) 798:00:48, 3 March 2011 (UTC) 785:12:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC) 764:21:26, 4 March 2011 (UTC) 751:14:24, 3 March 2011 (UTC) 731:PS I also posted this on 727:03:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC) 1984:Thanks for the article 1976:Did you know? talk page 309:Gguy, could you review 235:Malvern, Worcestershire 209:this placement of a tag 157:Elimination Chamber GAR 46:WikiProject Mathematics 1195: 18:User talk:Geometry guy 1618:That's the key thing 1536:Herding cats, indeed! 1330:Things will only get 1193: 555:Roosevelt Blue Plaque 485:Linear transformation 2200:Objective of Netball 450:on the image pages. 1947:... that Professor 808:Hello. The article 491:further remarks on 448:fair use rationales 2151:Just so you know, 1950:Andor Harvey Gomme 1941:Andor Harvey Gomme 1251:SDoGAbGAhnSDsTiJaJ 1196: 242:excellent comment 2133: 1982: 1981: 1969: 1821:You are welcome! 1786:narrative present 1620:Elen of the Roads 1594:Elen of the Roads 1561: 1489:Elen of the Roads 1452: 1301:March 2011 Update 1238:individual delist 747: 723: 75: 74: 2218: 2189: 2184: 2179: 2174: 2123: 1959: 1955: 1924: 1917: 1900: 1707: 1702: 1697: 1692: 1666: 1661: 1656: 1651: 1560: 1558: 1547: 1451: 1449: 1438: 1263: 1224: 1220: 1211: 1205: 1191: 1174: 1168: 1140: 1134: 1108: 1103: 1098: 1093: 1079: 1074: 1069: 1064: 1034: 1022: 1016: 981: 871: 866: 834: 829: 815:User:Betty Logan 745: 721: 710: 704: 682:Possible PR fix? 349:Mulholland Drive 318: 176: 166: 96: 95: 94: 41: 34: 2226: 2225: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2204: 2187: 2182: 2177: 2172: 2149: 2108:being affected. 2017: 1953: 1915: 1898: 1889: 1847: 1723: 1705: 1700: 1695: 1690: 1664: 1659: 1654: 1649: 1640: 1550: 1548: 1441: 1439: 1429: 1396: 1323:the Foundation 1304: 1273: 1261: 1252: 1222: 1218: 1203: 1200: 1189: 1186: 1166: 1163: 1132: 1129: 1122: 1106: 1101: 1096: 1091: 1077: 1072: 1067: 1062: 1047: 1032: 1014: 1011: 979: 974:glorious leader 897: 869: 864: 832: 827: 806: 772: 744: 720: 708: 702: 684: 604:FDR was there. 557: 493:Talk:Linear map 488: 433:Maury Markowitz 403:Maury Markowitz 399: 346: 316: 311:this discussion 307: 238: 201: 170: 164: 159: 122:now been posted 92: 32: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2224: 2222: 2203: 2196: 2148: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2016: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2001:Peter I. Vardy 1980: 1979: 1970:and add it to 1925: 1914: 1911: 1899:Sławomir Biały 1888: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1846: 1843:turtle farming 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1809:Peter I. Vardy 1793: 1789: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1764:Peter I. Vardy 1757: 1756: 1728:Peter I. Vardy 1722: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1639: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1544: 1537: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1511: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1478: 1477: 1428: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1401:Peter I. Vardy 1395: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1363: 1362: 1303: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1275: 1271: 1250: 1185: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1157: 1156: 1121: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1046: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 946: 896: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 857: 856: 805: 802: 801: 800: 771: 768: 767: 766: 741: 735:'s talk page. 717: 699: 698: 683: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 644:Barnards Green 597: 589: 585: 556: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 487: 482: 481: 480: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 398: 393: 392: 391: 376: 345: 342: 341: 340: 306: 303: 302: 301: 300: 299: 284: 277: 276: 237: 231: 200: 197: 196: 195: 158: 155: 154: 153: 152: 151: 150: 149: 73: 72: 42: 31: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2223: 2214: 2212: 2211: 2201: 2197: 2195: 2194: 2191: 2190: 2185: 2180: 2175: 2168: 2164: 2161: 2158: 2154: 2153:Amadscientist 2147: 2144: 2136: 2131: 2127: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2082: 2079: 2078: 2072: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2049:Mike Christie 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2025:Mike Christie 2022: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1977: 1973: 1967: 1963: 1957: 1952: 1951: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1936: 1935: 1934:Did you know? 1930: 1929:24 March 2011 1926: 1923: 1919: 1918: 1912: 1910: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1894: 1886: 1882: 1879: 1878: 1873: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1851: 1844: 1841: 1829: 1826: 1825: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1801: 1800: 1794: 1790: 1787: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1755: 1752: 1749: 1745: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1721: 1712: 1709: 1708: 1703: 1698: 1693: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1680: 1679: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1668: 1667: 1662: 1657: 1652: 1645: 1644:saw this post 1637: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1612: 1611: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1581: 1578: 1577: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1565: 1559: 1557: 1553: 1545: 1542: 1538: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1521: 1518: 1517: 1512: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1476: 1473: 1472: 1467: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1456: 1450: 1448: 1444: 1435: 1432: 1422: 1419: 1418: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1393: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1361: 1358: 1357: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1335: 1333: 1328: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1315: 1312: 1307: 1302: 1299: 1289: 1286: 1285: 1280: 1276: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1264: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1249: 1248: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1225: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1210: 1207: 1206: 1192: 1183: 1177: 1173: 1170: 1169: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1155: 1152: 1151: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1139: 1136: 1135: 1127: 1120: 1113: 1110: 1109: 1104: 1099: 1094: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1081: 1080: 1075: 1070: 1065: 1058: 1054: 1053: 1045: 1042: 1038: 1035: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1021: 1018: 1017: 997: 994: 993: 987: 986: 985: 982: 975: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 957: 954: 953: 947: 943: 942: 941: 937: 933: 929: 928: 927: 924: 923: 917: 916: 915: 914: 910: 906: 902: 894: 886: 883: 882: 877: 876: 875: 872: 867: 861: 860: 859: 858: 855: 852: 851: 845: 841: 840: 839: 838: 835: 830: 824: 820: 816: 811: 803: 799: 796: 795: 789: 788: 787: 786: 782: 778: 769: 765: 762: 761: 755: 754: 753: 752: 749: 748: 738: 734: 729: 728: 725: 724: 714: 707: 697: 693: 692: 691: 689: 681: 669: 666: 665: 660: 659: 658: 654: 650: 645: 641: 640: 639: 636: 635: 629: 628: 627: 623: 619: 614: 613: 612: 609: 608: 603: 598: 595: 590: 586: 582: 581: 580: 579: 575: 571: 566: 562: 554: 546: 543: 542: 536: 535: 534: 530: 526: 521: 520: 519: 516: 515: 509: 508: 507: 506: 502: 498: 494: 486: 483: 473: 470: 469: 464: 460: 459: 458: 455: 454: 449: 444: 443: 442: 438: 434: 430: 426: 425: 424: 421: 420: 415: 414: 413: 412: 408: 404: 397: 394: 390: 387: 386: 381: 377: 375: 372: 371: 365: 364: 363: 362: 358: 354: 350: 343: 339: 336: 335: 330: 329: 328: 327: 323: 319: 312: 298: 295: 294: 289: 285: 281: 280: 279: 278: 275: 271: 267: 263: 258: 257: 256: 255: 251: 247: 243: 236: 232: 230: 229: 225: 221: 216: 214: 210: 206: 198: 193: 190: 189: 184: 183: 182: 181: 177: 175: 174: 167: 156: 148: 145: 144: 139: 138: 137: 133: 129: 128: 123: 119: 115: 112: 111: 110: 106: 102: 101: 88: 87: 86: 85: 82: 81: 71: 67: 63: 62: 57: 56: 51: 47: 43: 40: 36: 35: 29: 26: 19: 2207: 2205: 2170: 2159: 2150: 2077:Geometry guy 2075: 2018: 1983: 1948: 1946: 1939: 1938: 1932: 1890: 1877:Geometry guy 1875: 1855: 1852: 1848: 1824:Geometry guy 1822: 1799:Geometry guy 1797: 1724: 1688: 1678:Geometry guy 1676: 1647: 1641: 1610:Geometry guy 1608: 1576:Geometry guy 1574: 1555: 1551: 1516:Geometry guy 1514: 1471:Geometry guy 1469: 1466:herding cats 1446: 1442: 1436: 1433: 1430: 1417:Geometry guy 1415: 1397: 1373: 1369: 1356:Geometry guy 1354: 1336: 1331: 1329: 1324: 1308: 1305: 1284:Geometry guy 1282: 1247:Geometry guy 1245: 1201: 1197: 1164: 1150:Geometry guy 1148: 1130: 1123: 1089: 1060: 1050: 1048: 1012: 1008: 992:Geometry guy 990: 973: 952:Geometry guy 950: 922:Geometry guy 920: 898: 881:Geometry guy 879: 850:Geometry guy 848: 807: 794:Geometry guy 792: 773: 760:Geometry guy 758: 739: 730: 715: 700: 694: 685: 664:Geometry guy 662: 634:Geometry guy 632: 607:Geometry guy 605: 601: 593: 558: 541:Geometry guy 539: 514:Geometry guy 512: 489: 468:Geometry guy 466: 453:Geometry guy 451: 428: 419:Geometry guy 417: 400: 385:Geometry guy 383: 370:Geometry guy 368: 351:. No lie. -- 347: 334:Geometry guy 332: 308: 293:Geometry guy 291: 287: 239: 220:WhatamIdoing 217: 202: 188:Geometry guy 186: 172: 171: 160: 143:Geometry guy 141: 125: 113: 98: 80:Geometry guy 78: 76: 59: 53: 50:The Signpost 49: 45: 28:The Signpost 27: 1986:Victuallers 1966:quick check 1541:John Sayles 844:Betty Logan 810:David Yates 511:to misuse. 89:I will try. 1962:here's how 1564:Discussion 1455:Discussion 932:GamerPro64 905:GamerPro64 711:? Thanks, 588:excursion! 396:NIF images 233:GA mice + 1556:Wolfowitz 1447:Wolfowitz 1378:KrebMarkt 1339:KrebMarkt 1262:EyeSerene 1223:EyeSerene 1033:EyeSerene 980:EyeSerene 901:talk page 870:Horcruxes 833:Horcruxes 743:<: --> 737:Ruhrfisch 719:<: --> 713:Ruhrfisch 688:Finetooth 30:interview 2163:contribs 2057:contribs 2033:contribs 1972:DYKSTATS 1751:Fatuorum 1394:DYK hook 1325:very own 1319:and the 1204:SilkTork 1167:SilkTork 1162:Thanks. 1133:SilkTork 1057:GAR page 1015:SilkTork 819:criteria 565:WP:WORCS 213:WT:EMBED 127:SMasters 118:Mabeenot 100:SMasters 61:SMasters 2061:library 2037:library 1872:WP:LEAD 1748:Malleus 1431:Hi GG! 1279:Lolicon 1234:Lolicon 972:As the 865:Hallows 828:Hallows 777:Kudpung 770:Thanks! 649:Kudpung 618:Kudpung 570:Kudpung 317:Georgia 266:Kudpung 246:Kudpung 114:Update: 2021:WT:FAC 1552:Kiefer 1443:Kiefer 1332:really 525:Zaslav 497:Zaslav 429:that's 2213:: --> 1893:WT:OR 1845:to GA 1184:Chair 742:: --> 718:: --> 353:Moni3 315:Sandy 16:< 2208:See 2206:< 2198:The 2157:talk 2130:talk 2071:Carl 2053:talk 2029:talk 2005:talk 1990:talk 1904:talk 1861:talk 1813:talk 1768:talk 1744:This 1732:talk 1624:talk 1598:talk 1493:talk 1487:. -- 1485:this 1405:talk 1382:talk 1374:hard 1370:easy 1343:talk 1306:Hi, 936:talk 909:talk 781:talk 653:talk 622:talk 602:when 594:have 574:talk 561:here 529:talk 501:talk 437:talk 407:talk 357:talk 322:Talk 270:talk 250:talk 224:talk 199:Ping 173:Talk 165:Afro 132:talk 105:talk 66:talk 55:here 2178:ter 2173:Hun 2126:CBM 2059:- 2035:- 1927:On 1857:TCO 1696:ter 1691:Hun 1655:ter 1650:Hun 1638:FYI 1097:ter 1092:Hun 1068:ter 1063:Hun 842:If 733:CBM 2188:hn 2183:Ka 2128:· 2063:) 2055:- 2039:) 2031:- 2007:) 1992:) 1964:, 1954:'s 1931:, 1906:) 1863:) 1815:) 1770:) 1734:) 1706:hn 1701:Ka 1665:hn 1660:Ka 1626:) 1600:) 1566:) 1495:) 1457:) 1407:) 1384:) 1345:) 1337:-- 1244:. 1219::D 1107:hn 1102:Ka 1078:hn 1073:Ka 938:) 911:) 783:) 709:}} 706:PR 703:{{ 655:) 624:) 576:) 531:) 503:) 495:. 465:. 439:) 409:) 359:) 324:) 272:) 252:) 226:) 178:) 134:) 107:) 97:– 68:) 2160:· 2155:( 2132:) 2124:( 2051:( 2027:( 2003:( 1988:( 1978:. 1968:) 1960:( 1902:( 1859:( 1811:( 1766:( 1730:( 1622:( 1596:( 1562:( 1554:. 1543:. 1491:( 1453:( 1445:. 1403:( 1380:( 1341:( 1208:* 1171:* 1137:* 1019:* 934:( 907:( 779:( 746:° 722:° 651:( 620:( 572:( 527:( 499:( 435:( 405:( 355:( 320:( 268:( 248:( 222:( 168:( 130:( 103:( 64:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index