478:. If you're Bill Phillips or your work for Phillips, you need to understand that Knowledge is an encyclopedia, not a forum for advertising or promoting yourself, or a vanity press. As such, it should contain only material that complies with its content policies, and Wikipedians must place the interests of the encyclopedia first. Any editor who gives priority to outside interests may be subject to a conflict of interest. A neutral point of view does not mean we remove all material that does not portray the subject as a saint. That in fact would violate Knowledge's NPOV policy just as much as an article that focuses on just one negative aspect or event. There's a reason why Knowledge has a
420:
myself). Chloe81375 was then blocked (14:14, May 31, 2010). Then on June 2, you insinuate that I'm TC Luoma while making the same accusations in the redacted posts by Chloe81375. Seeing as how there is no real evidence in either my editing patterns or evidence on my talk page to suggest that I am Luoma; then only the individual who posted the alleged personal information would know to insinuate a connection to that individual - meaning that
516:
263:
38:
245:. I'm more than happy to work towards consensus with any editor on any article, and since your wild and baseless allegations were first posted, some minor changes have been made to the Bill Phillips article, however they were done through civil discussion – not edit warring and not widespread blanking and censorship of sourced material (what you're calling "good faith" edits). --
654:
I've been asked to discuss my relationship to Chloe81375, who was blocked. I have no idea who this user is. I've also been associated above with User:Susan6235 and User:Susan2341. Again, these users are unknown to me. I have never posted personal information about any user. A check of my IP address
21:
could be considered vandalism. The
Phillips article is the target of a number of "new" editors with a conflict of interest with the subject (ie: writing it like a press release, removing sourced information - usually to write the article so as to remove and modify any references to steroids, Muscle
399:
My apologies for focusing on other editors. My reason for requesting an unblock has to do with updating the Bill
Phillips page with information about his new book and website. As for my relation to Chloe81375, I have none. I have no idea who this person is. I'm sure an IP check would resolve that.
136:
Yankees76 wasted no time in labeling them "ludicrous accusations." However, despite
Yankees76’s aggressive response, there has been an interesting development. Over the past weeks, the Bill Phillips page has been edited to remove some of the more egregious claims. A happy ending, right? Wrong. As
482:
policy. You should give it a read and ask yourself if your edits, and your accusations against other editors are the result of a conflict of interest and wether or not your edits are entirely encyclopedic. Considering that they're confined (as are the sockpuppets you're accused of using) to one
448:
who nearly all have user names with a word/name followed by a 3-5 digit number. Who else do we know who edits the Bill
Phillips article, removes the same information and references, and has a word followed by a random number 3-5 digit number in their user name? I think you'll find that there is
419:
have been redacted, meaning that they have been removed from
Knowledge's history, so that only certain administrators can view what was posted - making the number of individuals who knew the content of what was posted there extremely small (mostly confined to the user who posted it, admins and
141:
The charge is false. I have no idea who Chloe81375 is. Nevertheless I have been blocked. I understand
Knowledge’s policies regarding neutrality and biographies of living people. I also understand the futility of edit warring. But in the case of the Bill Phillips page, a single contributor has
489:
and work as part of a collaboration with other editors on not just the
Phillips article, but other articles as well, I would actually endorse you being unblocked. However, if you insist on following your current path of accusing me of adding "troublesome" material and continue to not
127:
For more than four years, user
Yankees76 has insisted on being the primary contributor to the page. In that time, Yankees76 has displayed extreme bias against Bill Phillips. As the Revision History clearly shows, Yankees76 promptly deletes/undoes any good faith additions to the page:
16:
Thanks for finding a source for the info on Amy Molen. Please note I reverted your other edits to Bill
Phillips (author). If you wish to make widespread changes to the article in the future, please dicuss your edits on the articles talk page. Deleting material for which there is a
474:, and as far as possible without bias, all significant views that have been published by reliable sources on the subject. So far you've painted the picture of my edits as being nothing but unsourced egregious claims - which is an outright lie and a
218:
Sorry, but my sockpuppet accusations are completely fair and founded. I went through the proper channels and an admin, looking at your edacted posts where you post my alleged personal information drew the obvious conclusion that you indeed are also
612:
I've just reviewed every edit this account has ever made. I'm convinced you are either a sock of some sort or a troll whose only purpose here is to push a particular point of view. It doesn't really matter which since neither are welcome.
494:, I will continue to remind administrators about your attempted outing/posting of personal information of one editor and threats to post the personal information of another. Give me the go ahead, and I'll add you to the
415:
It may be impossible to IP check, as all of Chloe81375's posts have been deleted/redacted from
Knowledge. However what's interesting is that the posts of Chloe81375 "outing" me as
442:
who's edits and content removal patterns in the article are nearly identical to yours. This isn't even mentioning the suspected and checkuser confirmed sockpuppets of Chloe81375
227:
about me, you too are also blocked, along with a number of other confirmed sockpuppets who coincidentally have only edited the Bill Phillips article in the same fashion as you.
470:, you could be a respected editor here. However these accusations against me need to stop. The material I've added is not only verifiable, but it also represents fairly,
142:
repeatedly added troublesome material over an extended period. And has now unfairly had me blocked. Your help in unblocking my account would be greatly appreciated.
647:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
392:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
198:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
157:. You request should focus solely on your behavior. Furthermore, you will need to discuss your relation to Chloe81375 (if any), showing how you are not her.
233:
and dealt with accordingly. I'm not sure why you feel the need to have a personal vendetta against me, but I won't be intimidated by editors who do not
556:
303:
78:
137:
soon as my objections were raised on the BLP Noticeboard, Yankees76 wasted no time in accusing me of being a sockpuppet of Chloe81375. See here:
632:
377:
183:
551:
298:
73:
168:
22:
Media, TC Luoma, Dan Duchaine bodybuilding etc.), and as such sweeping changes should be discussed before being implemented. --
479:
443:
138:
483:
article alone are you here to improve Knowledge or are you here to promote your own (or your employer's) interests?
528:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
365:
275:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
50:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
400:
Also, I have no knowledge whatsoever of the above claim about posting personal information. Thanks for your time.
133:
529:
276:
51:
570:
523:
317:
270:
92:
45:
229:
Posting another person's personal information is harassment and threats to out an editor are treated as a
446:
424:
posted the alleged personal information and continued the outing during your personal attack on me here.
360:
134:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Bill_Phillips_.28author.29
618:
500:
451:
247:
23:
506:
457:
253:
163:
27:
498:
and hopefully we can work together to make the Phillips article even better than it already is. --
241:
and false accusations to get the edits they want instead of working with other editors to form a
416:
224:
154:
641:
467:
386:
192:
658:
614:
534:
495:
486:
401:
281:
220:
205:
56:
439:
435:
242:
158:
491:
475:
238:
234:
230:
18:
655:
would make that clear. Please consider this a good-faith request to be unblocked.
130:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Bill_Phillips_(author)&action=history
139:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Chloe81375/Archive
124:
666:
622:
509:
460:
409:
367:
256:
213:
173:
31:
123:
Hello, This concerns the Knowledge page of the author Bill Phillips:
514:
485:
I tell you what - if you pledge to take a mentor by joining
261:
36:
153:
I'm sorry, but your unblock request is focused too much on
629:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
374:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
180:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
649:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
394:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
348:
To update Bill Phillips' page with new book information
223:, and since that user name was blocked indefinitely for
200:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
584:
580:
574:
565:
561:
547:
543:
539:
425:
331:
327:
321:
312:
308:
294:
290:
286:
129:
106:
102:
96:
87:
83:
69:
65:
61:
522:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
438:
a virtually identical user name to another editor -
359:
Request does not addres the reason for your block.--
269:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
44:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
449:plenty of evidence that shows your Chloe81375. --
434:positively match IPs with Chloe81375 - including
125:http://en.wikipedia.org/Bill_Phillips_(author)
8:
430:In addition, a number of user accounts
466:Just to let you know, I think with an
225:releasing alleged personal information
496:Candidates for rehabilitation section
132:Once these objections were raised on
7:
14:
1:
526:, who declined the request.
273:, who declined the request.
48:, who declined the request.
682:
667:15:31, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
633:guide to appealing blocks
623:16:21, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
510:23:05, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
461:22:11, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
410:20:17, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
378:guide to appealing blocks
368:21:20, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
257:18:57, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
214:15:34, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
184:guide to appealing blocks
174:16:37, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
662:
405:
209:
32:18:33, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
601:Accusations are false
519:
487:WikiProject User Rehab
468:involuntary mentorship
266:
41:
571:change block settings
518:
318:change block settings
265:
93:change block settings
40:
480:Conflict of interest
520:
267:
42:
492:assume good faith
235:assume good faith
673:
646:
640:
590:
588:
577:
559:
557:deleted contribs
517:
504:
455:
391:
385:
362:Anthony.bradbury
337:
335:
324:
306:
304:deleted contribs
264:
251:
197:
191:
171:
161:
112:
110:
99:
81:
79:deleted contribs
39:
681:
680:
676:
675:
674:
672:
671:
670:
652:
644:
638:
637:, then use the
626:
603:
578:
568:
554:
537:
530:blocking policy
515:
502:
476:personal attack
472:proportionately
453:
397:
389:
383:
382:, then use the
371:
350:
325:
315:
301:
284:
277:blocking policy
262:
249:
231:personal attack
203:
195:
189:
188:, then use the
177:
169:
159:
144:
100:
90:
76:
59:
52:blocking policy
37:
19:reliable source
12:
11:
5:
679:
677:
627:
610:
606:Decline reason
599:
595:Request reason
592:
513:
484:
464:
463:
440:User:Susan2341
436:User:Susan6235
428:
372:
357:
353:Decline reason
346:
342:Request reason
339:
260:
228:
178:
151:
147:Decline reason
121:
117:Request reason
114:
35:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
678:
669:
668:
664:
660:
656:
651:
650:
643:
636:
634:
625:
624:
620:
616:
609:
607:
602:
598:
596:
591:
586:
582:
576:
572:
567:
563:
558:
553:
549:
548:global blocks
545:
544:active blocks
541:
536:
531:
527:
525:
524:administrator
512:
511:
508:
507:
505:
497:
493:
488:
481:
477:
473:
469:
462:
459:
458:
456:
447:
444:
441:
437:
433:
429:
426:
423:
418:
414:
413:
412:
411:
407:
403:
396:
395:
388:
381:
379:
370:
369:
366:
364:
363:
356:
354:
349:
345:
343:
338:
333:
329:
323:
319:
314:
310:
305:
300:
296:
295:global blocks
292:
291:active blocks
288:
283:
278:
274:
272:
271:administrator
259:
258:
255:
254:
252:
244:
240:
236:
232:
226:
222:
216:
215:
211:
207:
202:
201:
194:
187:
185:
176:
175:
172:
167:
166:
162:
156:
155:other editors
150:
148:
143:
140:
135:
131:
126:
120:
118:
113:
108:
104:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
75:
71:
70:global blocks
67:
66:active blocks
63:
58:
53:
49:
47:
46:administrator
34:
33:
29:
25:
20:
657:
653:
648:
630:
628:
611:
605:
604:
600:
594:
593:
566:creation log
533:
521:
499:
471:
465:
450:
431:
421:
398:
393:
375:
373:
361:
358:
352:
351:
347:
341:
340:
313:creation log
280:
268:
246:
237:and who use
217:
204:
199:
181:
179:
164:
152:
146:
145:
122:
116:
115:
88:creation log
55:
43:
15:
659:Getfit1980
615:Beeblebrox
562:filter log
535:Getfit1980
402:Getfit1980
309:filter log
282:Getfit1980
221:Chloe81375
206:Getfit1980
84:filter log
57:Getfit1980
631:read the
581:checkuser
540:block log
376:read the
328:checkuser
287:block log
243:consensus
182:read the
103:checkuser
62:block log
24:Yankees76
552:contribs
417:TC Luoma
299:contribs
74:contribs
642:unblock
575:unblock
501:Yankees
452:Yankees
387:unblock
322:unblock
248:Yankees
239:threats
193:unblock
97:unblock
635:first
380:first
186:first
663:talk
619:talk
406:talk
210:talk
28:talk
585:log
532:).
432:did
422:you
332:log
279:).
170:Man
107:log
54:).
665:)
645:}}
639:{{
621:)
608::
597::
579:•
573:•
569:•
564:•
560:•
555:•
550:•
546:•
542:•
503:76
454:76
408:)
390:}}
384:{{
355::
344::
326:•
320:•
316:•
311:•
307:•
302:•
297:•
293:•
289:•
250:76
212:)
196:}}
190:{{
160:TN
149::
119::
101:•
95:•
91:•
86:•
82:•
77:•
72:•
68:•
64:•
30:)
661:(
617:(
589:)
587:)
583:(
538:(
445:,
427:.
404:(
336:)
334:)
330:(
285:(
208:(
165:X
111:)
109:)
105:(
60:(
26:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.