304:, and has been for several months. That said, I'm not sure if they really are similar -- the donkey is in fact the logo of the Democratic party (I assume we're talking US, here, given the context), and I don't see such an argument applying in favor of this username, here. Your latest choice is probably better than the current name, but still sounds to me like a POV-username -- this is one of the few sites where that sort of thing may be problematic. Feel free to discuss, though. –
32:
202:
388:
to put up with to help here. I've just sort of been surfing random articles and doing little clean-ups and such where I could. Now my name's being attacked and I'm being accused of being this
Torture guy. What next, someone will say I'm a clone? (Don't tell me, clone probably has some secret meaning here too.)
387:
I'm not entirely sure what a sockpuppet is, but I've looked it up. I don't know who this person is who is making this allegation against me, and I looked at the 'evidence' and have no idea what they're talking about. I'm not sure this place is worth the effort if this is the sort of garbage you have
177:
I didn't say I was not opposed to changing the name. I said I'm not TOTALLY opposed to changing it, but I think it should be given a fair hearing. I was fishing around and noticed the name "Demsaredonkeys" was allowed to stand, even though that user has since changed it. I also wonder if either of
286:
Thanks for your advice, and you have more experience with this place than I do, but if "Demsaredonkeys" can be approved I see no reason why WhiteHouseDelouse shouldn't be. I mean, who wants lice to be left alone? Then again I don't see what's wrong with
GrotesqueOldParty - you yourself had a long
187:
Further - the very first thing I will do if I do change my name is go public and request a full discussion in the appropriate forum on usernames. I will use the prior decision in favor of
Demsaredonkeys and any other names which may possibly be seen as anti-Democratic to argue in my favor. This
117:
I don't understand this at all - and isn't there some sort of process to go through? I think there should be some sort of discussion about this and I should be able to take part in it. I think I've been a good citizen even though I'm fairly new here and I don't understand why I'm being treated so
324:
I'm new, but as far as I can tell POV usernames are not banned. I see them all the time here. BTW, why was the
Demsaredonkeys guy banned after his name was allowed? Was it for some other reason?
341:
is just vague enough that most blocks/renames/etc are judgment calls, but you also get the blatantly objectionable ones as well. I'd say both your current name and requested name (
72:
170:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
346:
232:
67:
155:
413:
118:
abruptly. I ask that the ban be lifted and for a discussion. I'm not totally opposed to changing this name, BTW, I just want a chance.
86:
257:
135:
261:
45:
256:- "To rid (a person or an animal) of lice by physical or chemical means". I would expect this name to be rejected by
39:
129:
None of that needed, especially since you're not opposed to changing the name. Just follow the directions above. —
44:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
226:
407:
337:
You're right that I don't have any real objection to your current name, but I can see where others would. The
342:
222:
389:
369:
325:
288:
189:
179:
50:
297:
278:
244:
192:
182:
145:
25:
358:
314:
273:
338:
403:
22:
287:
interaction with me and didn't object to it, after all. If this one is rejected I'll try another.
422:
350:
306:
265:
164:
140:
417:
241:
427:
392:
372:
363:
328:
319:
291:
178:
you even bothered to look up the word "grotesque" before making your decisions.
130:
349:
before committing to a new name, I'd be willing to unblock for that purpose. -
260:
under the grounds that it may be "insulting to other people or groups." (See
253:
188:
discussion will take place either way, so why not get it over with now?
345:) fall into the judgment call area. If you'd like to file a report at
264:). Just a heads up, as you may wish to give it another a try. -
402:
You have been blocked indefinitely for being a sockpuppet of
30:
196:
152:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
172:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
301:
262:
Knowledge (XXG):Username policy#Inappropriate usernames
100:
96:
90:
81:
77:
63:
59:
55:
38:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
368:Yes, I would very much like to do that. Thanks!
347:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/User names
8:
21:Say it slowly, one syllable at a time. --
7:
16:
14:
258:Knowledge (XXG):Changing username
200:
1:
416:) As confirmed by checkuser.
296:As a bit of a clarification,
218:for the following reason(s):
221:Allowing username change to
212:Your request to be unblocked
42:, who declined the request.
17:What's wrong with that name
443:
199:
428:15:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
393:05:15, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
373:05:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
364:04:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
329:05:08, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
320:04:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
292:03:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
279:01:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
245:07:23, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
193:01:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
183:01:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
156:guide to appealing blocks
146:21:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
26:04:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
35:
383:Sockpuppet accusation
87:change block settings
34:
298:User:Demsaredonkeys
239:Request handled by:
36:
390:GrotesqueOldParty
370:GrotesqueOldParty
361:
343:WhiteHouseDelouse
326:GrotesqueOldParty
289:GrotesqueOldParty
276:
251:
250:
223:WhiteHouseDelouse
190:GrotesqueOldParty
180:GrotesqueOldParty
51:GrotesqueOldParty
434:
359:
356:
353:
318:
311:
274:
271:
268:
207:
204:
203:
197:
169:
163:
143:
138:
133:
106:
104:
93:
75:
73:deleted contribs
33:
442:
441:
437:
436:
435:
433:
432:
431:
400:
385:
354:
351:
339:username policy
307:
305:
269:
266:
205:
201:
175:
167:
161:
160:, then use the
149:
141:
136:
131:
120:
94:
84:
70:
53:
46:blocking policy
31:
19:
12:
11:
5:
440:
438:
404:TortureIsWrong
399:
396:
384:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
249:
248:
220:
219:
208:
150:
127:
123:Decline reason
115:
111:Request reason
108:
29:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
439:
430:
429:
425:
424:
419:
415:
412:
409:
405:
397:
395:
394:
391:
382:
374:
371:
367:
366:
365:
362:
357:
348:
344:
340:
336:
330:
327:
323:
322:
321:
316:
312:
310:
303:
300:is currently
299:
295:
294:
293:
290:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
277:
272:
263:
259:
255:
247:
246:
243:
240:
236:
234:
231:
228:
224:
217:
213:
209:
198:
195:
194:
191:
185:
184:
181:
174:
173:
166:
159:
157:
148:
147:
144:
139:
134:
126:
124:
119:
114:
112:
107:
102:
98:
92:
88:
83:
79:
74:
69:
65:
64:global blocks
61:
60:active blocks
57:
52:
47:
43:
41:
40:administrator
28:
27:
24:
421:
410:
401:
386:
308:
252:
238:
237:
229:
215:
211:
210:
186:
176:
171:
153:
151:
128:
122:
121:
116:
110:
109:
82:creation log
49:
37:
20:
309:Luna Santin
78:filter log
214:has been
154:read the
97:checkuser
56:block log
414:contribs
233:contribs
68:contribs
418:GDonato
398:Blocked
302:blocked
254:Delouse
242:Spartaz
216:granted
165:unblock
91:unblock
352:auburn
267:auburn
23:Milton
355:pilot
270:pilot
158:first
423:talk
408:talk
360:talk
315:talk
275:talk
227:talk
132:Jmlk
101:log
48:).
426:)
235:)
168:}}
162:{{
125::
113::
95:•
89:•
85:•
80:•
76:•
71:•
66:•
62:•
58:•
420:(
411:·
406:(
317:)
313:(
230:·
225:(
206:Y
142:7
137:1
105:)
103:)
99:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.