Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Groggy Dice

Source 📝

1374:
Knowledge (XXG) is a general audience encyclopedia, including those who don't know what Vorlons are, even if it's hard to see how someone who hadn't heard of Vorlons would be able to meaningfully expand a stub. However, beyond setting up the stub, I really have no plans to do anything further with it, nor do I consider myself the WP:OWNer of the template, so if you have ideas about things to do with it, you should probably post them on the template's talk page, so that other interested editors can see them and comment. --
3046:. There's a new bonus prize of $ 200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! 1481: 952:
articles (the lists of books without proper capitalization, the trivial nature of the information) didn't impress me. Since it appears as thought I was tagging articles that should stay I'm glad other editors found that my PRODs weren't the right choice and removed them. As for tagging them first for cleanup, I find that the threat of deletion if often the only way to get anyone to properly source an article. Not that that it always works. For example,
307:
unlike Anita Hill. As an aside, I had about the same coverage some time ago for a different (and more positive) reason. In no way did that make me notable, and people soon forgot my name. I expect the same for Bradford. I wish more people spent time with these AfDs, and I appreciate your digging as much as you have. In the same way, some of us have spent considerable time on this even if we come up with a different decision.
1245: 3061: 2854: 1763: 2755: 3017:. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ -- 1671: 2913: 3009:. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like 2042: 2455: 925:. Allowing the original prodder to decide whether he found the reasoning for a deprod to be sufficient or "proper" would essentially give him veto power over deprodding. As for the reason that was given in these cases, "seems notable" may be vague, but note that many prods give something like "seems nn" as their reason, which is just as vague. -- 3013:. For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current 1608: 1449: 1423: 1211:, or else have the edited version reviewed by an admin or other experienced and uninviolved editor, before moving this back into the mainspace. I also advise you to have all your ducks in a row, with sources clearly indicating notability in the article. But it is now up to you and whoever may choose to assist you. 2300:
the image is simple wiki markup, which you apparently understand. Personally, it doesn't seem necessary or even useful to have it in the image anymore, so it makes more sense to simply delete it. As you point out, it's actually virtually identical to the numbers from Q1, so go ahead and simply delete
1070:
See that the CentAm Crisis is a specialty of yours. I've worked on, or in some cases created, various articles on topics related to the Salvadoran civil war; these are listed on my user page if you're interested. If you speak Spanish, you might check out the articles in that Knowledge (XXG) as well —
901:
I see you've put up Karen Lamm and Kelsey Mulrooney for AfD already, But I wasn't the one who de-prodded them, and I looked at them, which goes to show that there are people more inclusionist than me. I think I even endorsed one or two of your prods. As for K.K. Dodds specifically, remember that PROD
522:
Hello. I just saw your rationale for upgrading your support to strong on my RfA. I had just read the latest oppose votes and while I had thus far been taking the punches rather well, I felt today a strong tingle of discouragement at the absurdity of it all (I guess I'm just having a bad day). So your
328:
On the basis of your excellent and successful attempt to provide reliable sources for the William Bradford article, proving his notability and substantiating the article's claims, I have changed my "vote" from a weak delete to a keep. I am seriously impressed by the quality and quantity of your work.
2227:
I want you to know that I went back to quadells edit before the block expired. I realize that I may have acted to soon and I apologize. I agreed to the mediation and I should have been more patient. Even though we never specifically agreed to it I realize that there was a sorta informal truce that I
1052:
is excised completely from such topics, as it's significant in its own right, yet I realize it doesn't have as major a role as some other topics. Bringing them all together as a common grouping seems like a workable solution as well as being informative and drawn from the existing published material
850:
who you argued had appeared in minor roles in major releases. Indeed she did, but my concerns are twofold: She only appeared in minor roles. This concerns me in that some will argue that simply appearing (even without lines) in a major release is notable. I was in a major release as an extra and I'm
719:
That said, thank you for your kind words about my conduct at the Carr AfD. I do try to be reasonable in every dispute I am involved with... and since my major reason for puting that article up for AfD was the lack of sources, and a frustration over the lack of response to my repeated calls for such
714:
Hey Groggy... Nothing serious... but I just want to register a slight objection to your labeling ALR, MSJapan and me as "the Masonic Three" (or whatever it was you called us) It sounds as if we are in collusion or a voting cabal or something. I can assure you that we don't always edit in lock step.
826:
I noticed that you have voted yes for the Category: Malayalee_Americans. There is now a vote started by Bakasuprman to delete and merge the Category: Tamil_Americans to Indian Americans and Sri Lankan Americans. This negative action will further divide the Tamils into either Indian or Sri Lankan.
689:
I'm sorry if you think I misrepresented what happened in that AfD, it was not my intention to leave a misleading impression. I never claimed to have any special evidence that you were anything other than an outside observer. Yes, you were not the only deletion vote (or !vote), but the three of you
162:
Frankly, I thing it would be a bad idea. What grounds would there be for denying anyone else who wanted to add a film or documentary to that section? Or books, etc. In fact, I considered deleting Nicaraguan Sign Language while I was there, I think its connection to the Sandinistas is tangential. I
2304:
As far as saving a copy of the image, the old one will still be there if you upload a new one, so go for it. I don't recall manipulating the URL so I don't know why "&chl=Internet+Explorer|Firefox|Safari|Opera|Netscape|Other" didn't appear. I think it would be great if this was an SVG, but my
1336:
Hmmm... At this point it's been up for most of a day without causing a firestorm, so my instinct is to leave it up unless someone else finds it problematic. In which case, I'll remove (not strikethrough) it. That's assuming that your advice is based on general caution. If there is some particular
951:
I happened upon them while going through the uncategorized pages cue and the manner in which one editor had been adding them to wikipedia made me suspicious. I honestly thought they were nothing but SPAM bios. I will admit that my PRODing them was a little haphazard, but the sloppy nature of the
771:
You're talking about JRR Tolkien? Despite my userbox, I'm afraid my Tolkien phase was many years ago, closer to the Rankin Bass era than the Peter Jackson era. He was a professor, but I don't know why he created original languages for Middle Earth. It may have something to do with his interest in
720:
sources, it was only right to withdraw the nom to give you time to add some once you expressed an interest in doing so. Many contentious AfD's could be resolved amicably if more people were willing to compromise and discuss. What is sad is that it often takes an AfD to get people to that point.
906:
deletions. Some of my deprods are for articles that I think would easily pass AfD, but sometimes I deprod if the article seems contestable. Dodds might or might not survive AfD - I myself noted it was a "close call" - but I can see it being contested. She might not be getting lead roles, but she
626:
I like your ideas regarding both the specific article revisions and the general changes to approach. Do you think is worth the effort to maintain a list of importance guidelines? I could create a subpage for that purpose so maintenance would not require editing a talk page (although editing talk
306:
news about Bradford among academics. There have been 2 articles that mention him in passing, and one that is about him (two in 2005, one in 2004). In your opinion, if that is enough for notability, then he is notable. Within two years, noone will remember his name -- even in academic circles;
1976:
I think I figured out what happened. When you went to Jpineda's talk page, the only item on it was a welcome template from SqueakBox. Somehow you ended up adding your comments to the welcome template rather than to Jpineda's page. Elchimba is one of the users who received a welcome from SB, and
1318:
Though I agree with your evaluation of the notability of the subject, I am not quite sure that your comment "I don't think Theresa Knott is fully equipped to appreciate the notability of Playboy Playmates. " was appropriate--and if you do not understand why, please email me. I suggest that you
879:
Which this bio doesn't meet. Indeed, the bios I have PRODed don't meet these criteria as well. My other concern is that for most of these folks there is a lack of biographical material on them besides a simple listing of credits. For many, the only real source is IMDB which is not considered a
1373:
There's a policy against using fair use images in stub templates, so a picture of Kosh is probably out. Even show logos have been deemed inadmissible. As for the text, it would probably be considered clever on a B5 wiki, but I doubt it would fly here on Knowledge (XXG). The principle is that
592:
Hey..you recently removed the prod at the above article saying the article has a "long history and several editors". I was wonder how edits by the same FEW people count has that. Additionally, if you don't want it deleted should you not write on the discussion and not just remove the prod?
1146: 2202:. The article is now up to par. The other person involved seems to have a problem with one Unification Church member's editing on creationism/intelligent design/evolution articles and is tagging UC articles to put pressure on him. (That's how it seems to me, I could be wrong however.) 176:
I can't really say you are wrong. There would be no grounds to deny adding a film, documentary or book. In my opinion, that would not be a bad thing; I have seen several articles mention related films etc. But if you strongly disagree, I see no reason to push forward with it.
1293:, yup, I shouldn't have reverted it, but you removed a sizable chunk of material (over 2 Kb) without actually mentioning it in the edit summary - always suspicious. Might I suggest that you get into the habit of making more detailed summary comments? Thank you, 3085:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
251:
I haven't been watching it very well. If you have no objections I would like to copy your comments from my talk page to the AfD talk page and leave a note for the closing admin. You've laid them out well and they shoud be somewhere that can be easily seen.
921:, you will see that it says that you are not supposed to reprod, even if the tag is removed without a reason or by the creator. Again, PROD is not for any article you think ought to be deleted, but those articles whose deletion you believe would not be 663:
No problem on editing out the article from Dyestat. Actually, that was already part of the Jordan Hasay entry when I started editing yesterday. All I did as far as the article was to put a link to the original. I was kind of surprised to find it here.
537:
Hello - I'm contacting you because of your involvement with using English instead of foreign terms in articles. A few are trying to "Anglicise" French terms in Wiki articles according to current guidelines but there is some resistance (eg/: "Région =:
2434:. I'm pretty sure I "know" you well enough that the following words are unnecessary, but just in case, please remain cool and civil even if you disagree vehemently with what he's posted, and respond to the issues raised as specifically as possible. -- 1269:, and for the helpful tips given to Hammer for his and his otters' next run at gaining the key. Also, Hammer has talked to the otters, and from now on they promise not to leave fish guts and clamshells on the Articles for Deletion pages anymore. 2880:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
1774:
prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
960:. I will assume her popularity means that she has been written up in independent and verifiable sources, and that eventually those sources will be added to her article. Thanks for bringing your concerns to my attention. Happy wikipedia-ing. 1977:
through transclusion, your comments addressed to Jpineda were showing on his talk page. So it appeared you were inviting him to join. Alfredo Lago also got a welcome from SB in the past couple of days, and had the same misunderstanding. --
1636:. Your trust in me is greatly appreciated, and I can assure you it has not been misplaced. I shall use these tools to the best of my ability, and will do my best not to let you down. Thank you once again, and happy editing as always! 604:
I perhaps should have noted in my PROD nomination that the category "Bahraini People" is a much better method of tracking Bahrainis that maintaining a list. It seems that many lists are going that way. Perhaps you may reconsider.
973:
Well, I guess every day you do learn something. Thanks for the FYI, I'll try to remember that. I do find myself assuming often that en.wikipedia contributors are always native speakers, but that isn't nearly always the case.
2673: 1104:
I've noticed that you are active in the BattleTech articles here at Knowledge (XXG). I've started a proposal for a Battletech Wikiproject. If you are interested please check out my proposal at the Battletech main article's
297:
who you are talking about. Bradford has nowhere near the name recognition of Hill, even among academics. There are certain people and groups who would like to change that, but it hasn't happened yet. I searched through
883:
Forgive my long-windedness, I simply wanted to give you a good explanation for my actions with PROD. It is nice to know someone is looking over my shoulder and I'm sure we'll be contesting PRODs in the future. Take care!
2606: 1818:
some agreement as to what will be done to statements you diagree with when the article is unlocked. My suggestion is to give the other guy a day to supply references, then flag them. Then wait a week or so and delete
2884:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
2539: 3089:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
2958:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1831:
that sections will be changed one at a time so the rest of us can appreciate what is going on. (And considering, polishing a section a day is probably better than having it get to this state. It won't take that
2917: 1852:
It doesn't have to be my list, above, but it needs to be something on the discussion page that indicates that you guys can function as a "team" however you may disagree with each other over the facts.
956:, who you de-PRODed saying that she was a 'popular romance author' remains a completely unreferenced article. Technically, being a 'popular romance author' doesn't pass the criteria for inclusion on 1904:
Chimba/Elchimba indicated on my page that he wants to join the mediation....as a mediator! I've forgotten why I asked him except I think you suggested it. Can you refresh my obviously bad memory?
277:
My comments were not ironic. I know of these groups. It is possible that eventually, William Bradford will become notable, but I doubt it. I do not want to dissuade you from your decision to
912:
As for using IMDB, it may be user-submitted, but the information is generally accurate. It does commit sins of omission - it says that Jack Klugman only appeared in 28 of Quincy's 147 episodes!
2998: 2877: 2052: 2267:
We're off and running for real now. Sections dealing with 2 of the 5 issues are now posted. Please read carefully and respond appropriately. Thanks so much for being part of this process. --
620: 2667: 3043: 3036: 3082: 3014: 2392:. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 690:
accounted for three of the four original delete votes. And I did allude to the fact that Blueboar withdrew his nomination. I'm not sure how my "story" is "different" from this. --
1739:
Thanks for your lucid comments on the Contras. A complex topic. We needed the balance and effort particularly after the extreme recent reversion to a blatantly biased article.
3006: 2600: 1435: 1266: 1254: 2351: 1363:
I noticed your Babylon 5 stub template. Wouldn't it be cool if it had a picture of Kosh and said something like "Reticence is for Vorlons. Please expand this article."? -
907:
seemes to be more than an extra - her parts generally have names, not just "secretary" or "nurse." Also, she apparently has some stage roles that aren't in the article yet.
2252:
I'm hamstrung because two of the parties are not responding at the mediation talk page. I'll nudge them again, but we'll then have to consider progressing without them. --
675:
I read the article as an outside observer, and gave my opinion. Mine was not the only deletion vote, and the only reason it was "no consensus" was because the nomination
2533: 1682: 2228:
should have honored. I agree we should wait for the mediation committee to make there decision before we start editing again. I will make no further edits until then.
2175: 739:
Deletion tag was removed by the original author, not an admin. I have put the tage back and suggest that it stay in place until the discussion has completed as per
192:
It occured to me that, as far as the "See also" part goes you are absolutely right. But, would you object if I created a special section about films, books, etc?
1629: 477: 108: 92: 1874:
You have been listed as a party on the above request for mediation. Please go to the aboce page and indicate whether or not you are happy to proceed. Regards,
3024: 3072: 2866: 2091: 2058: 1868: 1842:
We need you two guys since you seem to be the only ones with this whole article in your head. And we need the difference of opinion to get a good article.
1401: 128:
Thanks for the heads up--Guess it doesn't pay to plan ahead. This will reach far more if anyone starts doing characters and such. Shrug- I'm on break. //
2467: 1537:
to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add
70: 1521:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the 558:
I think you can stop adding citations at the AfD - I have withdrawn it (for now)... what would help is to add material to the article itself. Thanks
391: 2818: 1526: 54: 2389: 2378: 3010: 111:, so that others will see it. Easy enough to copy and paste. I'll do so if you don't in the next few minutes (if you've turned in for the night).-- 484:
during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion.
1123:
Oh, it was an error. It should have been a keep, so I re-opened the debate and leave it for someone else to close. Please accept my apologies. -
30:
to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
2983: 2688: 2283: 2115: 1506: 541: 352: 74: 2655: 827:
This is really uncalled for, and just a spitefull request by user Bakasuprman. So, please vote YES to keep the Category: Tamil Americans
2048: 1502: 407:
Hi Groggy... you recently removed the prod at the above article, saying the subject was notable. That is fine, but I am curious as to
209:
Personally, I think the best bet might be to create a new List page of such works, then link to the "List of..." page from See also. --
1337:
reason to believe that Theresa Knott might feel personally hurt, offended, or singled out if she saw it, I'd remove it immediately. --
995:
the other week. I don't know if you know anything more about him, or have any interest, but thought it never hurts to ask. All Best:)
2822: 1530: 772:
linguistics, and his desire to flesh out the details of his setting. I don't know how or if he he might be related to John Ruskin. --
461: 73:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out
1988: 1933: 1385: 1348: 1188: 936: 783: 701: 299: 3002: 2621: 1090:
It is my great plesure that someone have a diffrent opinon about notability for Fudokan as a style in the world of Martial Artists
917:
I also noticed that you have reprodded some articles, saying they had been deprodded "without proper justification." If you review
163:
also thought about whether Carlos Mejia Godoy should be there, but he at least has some merit as a troubador of the Revolution. --
2588: 1815:
We need some statement from you and anonymous (I'm leaving the same note to him) in the discussion page that (a suggested list):
2979: 799: 480:. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of 2649: 2554: 1792: 39: 27: 2484: 2810: 2766: 2744: 2521: 1776: 1771: 1498: 740: 2109: 1048:
template (and similar spots) while not getting coverage out of proportion. I, for example, tend to get irritated when the
644: 387: 269: 256: 2814: 2645: 1822:
reversions won't occur when the article is unlocked. That you will respect his edits even if you don't agree with them,
3076: 2970:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
2870: 2385: 1782: 1510: 1463: 59: 3018: 2975: 2729: 2582: 2314: 1462:
I've seen you weigh in on at least two articles regarding this, so you may want to help reach a final consensus here:
2722:
as an unsourced negative BLP, happy to restore if you can provide reliable sources for the contentious bits. Cheers
2695: 464:
process. I am notifying you because of your previous involvement in the editing of this article. I do not feel that
2636: 846:
Hi! I've noticed you have contested a few articles that I had PRODed. A few of these I will put up for AFD such as
828: 421: 313: 2578: 2515: 2333: 1556: 1204: 572:
I'd like to thank you for tactfully and civilly pointing out that I was talking complete bollocks. All the best!
1787:. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a 34: 2861: 2845: 2492: 2305:
understanding of SVG is poor at best, so I cannot do it myself and yes, MS Paint won't help me. Thanks again. —
1708: 383: 338: 266: 253: 2474:
policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure
2009:
Sorry to put you to all that work! I'm glad you figured it out! I thought I was going nuts for awhile since I
1013:, I was hoping you could weigh in on the category discussions going on related to the page. There are in fact 66: 2896: 2797: 2628: 2511: 2318: 2145: 1875: 1037: 576: 476:). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 2834: 2724: 2661: 2207: 2199: 1690:
I truly appreciate the many votes of confidence, and I will exert myself to live up to those expectations.
1518: 744: 2971: 2826: 2246: 1788: 1534: 468:
satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and I have explained why in the nomination space (see
2133: 1049: 1024: 78: 2561: 2479: 1767: 757:
He was a professor right? Why did he need to make up a fake language for his book? Was he related to
49: 1294: 1552: 808: 545: 2947: 2938: 2475: 3067: 3051: 2681: 2614: 2547: 2357:
Please check I've faithfully reproduced your issues and respond to my initial questions. Thanks. --
2296:
the image itself using MS Paint and changed the font size of the title with it as well. The legend
2121: 1704: 1439: 1270: 1262: 1044:
We'll see if it sticks. It is a good idea as an approach to keeping this relevant topic within the
436: 432: 334: 2967: 2951: 2594: 1670: 1517:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
851:
in the final cut, but am I notable, of course not. Even with a few lines, I think it's stretching
2886: 2482:. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2341: 2018: 1955: 1909: 1857: 1744: 1541: 1290: 1215: 1128: 996: 975: 961: 892: 573: 524: 485: 361: 134: 115: 99: 2762: 2748: 2569: 1145: 991:
Hi, Thanks for starting this article; I thought I'd let you know I added a few questions to its
1501:
process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge (XXG)'s
1480: 1244: 3099: 2865:
is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to
2830: 2793: 2709: 2439: 2416: 2397: 2362: 2272: 2257: 2203: 2183: 2103: 1581: 1548: 1494: 1076: 1058: 992: 953: 640: 598: 2963: 2955: 2527: 2245:
I'm sympathetic, but under the terms I need to operate with, I can't really do too much. See
2013:
the message (on the wrong page)! Then later, it appeared to be gone (and no history either!).
1522: 1072: 918: 733: 501: 2411:
Hi. I'm sorry, I seem to have inadvertently delayed the Mediation. I'll pick this up now. --
2074: 1978: 1923: 1375: 1338: 1227: 1178: 1161: 1019: 926: 773: 691: 606: 401: 210: 164: 2966:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2959: 2780: 2471: 2459: 1208: 1014: 1010: 957: 852: 494: 469: 2719: 2502: 2310: 2229: 1571: 1106: 803: 586: 290: 281:
the article, that is, after all, your judgement of the situation. I based my decision to
1054: 880:
reliable source as it is based on submitted information that may or may not be checked.
473: 1694:
will look to keep your concerns in mind in the future. Thanks for voicing your opinion!
2922: 2779:
While all contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be
1131: 1091: 428: 1762: 505: 2337: 2292:
First off, I am glad you alerted me - don't think it rude at all. I added the legend
2014: 1951: 1905: 1853: 1796: 1740: 1692:
Even though you did not support me, your comments are nevertheless appreciated, and I
1637: 1489: 1364: 1326: 1212: 1110: 885: 762: 721: 559: 509: 412: 357: 130: 112: 96: 44: 2754: 3095: 2705: 2435: 2412: 2393: 2358: 2268: 2253: 2179: 2098: 1577: 1467: 1405: 985: 855:. It should be noted that WP:BIO also includes the following criteria for actors: 680: 632: 293:
hearings. What makes Anita Hill notable is that you can say her name, and people
382:
article and make any improvements that seem appropriate? I tried to expand it. --
156: 2488:
article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the
2443: 2097:
Please could you pop over to the above page and state whether or not you accept
2070: 2041: 1408: 847: 758: 481: 465: 457: 450: 379: 372: 834:
Also, if you could get others to vote yes, it would be appreciated. Thank you.
2306: 1265:
and his romp of Knowledge (XXG)-editing otters thank you for participating in
286: 231: 193: 178: 153: 2803:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
500:
I've restored it at your request. You might like to work on the article for
308: 2178:
and then keep an eye on that page for further developments. Many thanks. --
619:
GroggyDice: Thanks for your feedback; there is a more detailed response at
3105: 3030: 2987: 2932: 2901: 2838: 2738: 2713: 2420: 2401: 2366: 2345: 2322: 2276: 2261: 2232: 2211: 2187: 2168: 2078: 2022: 1992: 1959: 1937: 1913: 1898: 1861: 1809: 1748: 1713: 1649: 1588: 1560: 1470: 1442: 1389: 1367: 1352: 1330: 1308: 1276: 1230: 1217: 1192: 1168: 1113: 1094: 1079: 1061: 1030: 999: 978: 964: 940: 895: 813: 787: 765: 747: 724: 705: 683: 650: 609: 579: 562: 548: 527: 512: 488: 440: 415: 394: 366: 341: 321: 272: 259: 234: 213: 196: 181: 167: 139: 118: 102: 81: 1321: 1045: 2454: 355:. I'll see if being a good samaritan qualifies for a Barnstar. Best! // 152:
Hi. Instead of deleting Carla's song, could we not mention both movies?
2954:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
2907:
AfD on a page you have previously edited or commented on a previous AfD
1828:
that an attempt will be made to avoid changing each other's statements.
1754: 1160:
I'm awarding you this barnstar for your great work on Knowledge (XXG)!
2918:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Quantum fiction (2nd nomination)
2301:
it if you want and re-upload the image as just a pie chart and title.
1607: 1448: 1422: 329:
I am still unwilling to consider FrontPageMag.com a reliable source
2332:
Hey there. I've placed a copy of the Scarlett McAlister article at
1404:, which passed 63 to 1. I hope that I am doing a good job so far. 1203:
I have restored restored the Abby Abadi article and userfied it to
679:. That's a very different story than the one you're telling now. 2999:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎
2878:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Free Rasalhague Republic
91:
You indicated in your edit summary that you would oppose the
2753: 2458:
Hello Groggy Dice! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
1669: 1525:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 1479: 623:. I was starting to wonder if anyone was paying attention. 1438:. It was a success, and I look forward to getting started! 378:
Could you please take a look at the current version of the
3071:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
1513:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the 3083:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/The Succession Wars
3015:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon
2174:
Thanks for agreeing. Please read my opening comments at
1505:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " 3065:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
3007:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge
2821:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
2431: 2139: 2127: 1615: 861:
Multiple features in credible magazines and newspapers.
2786:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
2680: 2613: 2546: 2352:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Requests for mediation/Contras/RS
1835:
Whether to keep or lose Brown or Kagan as references
1797: 523:
extra support was particularly appreciated. Cheers,
2694: 2627: 2560: 2057:You can find more information on the case subpage, 864:
A large fan base, fan listing, or "cult" following.
333:, but for the purposes of this article is apropos. 95:, so I thought it would be polite to notify you.-- 2946:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1497:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the 478:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Liza Wright 289:. She is completely non-notable, except for the 109:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Lynn Willis 2466:of the articles that you created are tagged as 2247:Knowledge (XXG):Mediation#What_mediators_are_not 1207:. Happy editing. I strongly urge you to come to 627:pages is not explicitely against wiki-policy)? 540:Departement"). Your input would be appreciated 427:I've put it up on AFD, if you want to comment. 3001:has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland 2092:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for mediation/Contras 2059:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for mediation/Contras 1869:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for mediation/Contras 800:Talk:Historical_Eastern_Germany#Requested_move 77:or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  — 107:You should probably enter your opposition at 8: 819:Please Vote YES for Category:Tamil_Americans 3011:Knowledge (XXG):The 1000 Challenge (Nordic) 1017:, and are somewhat stagnant at the moment. 798:I think you'll be quite interested in this: 2916:You are invited to join the discussion at 2468:Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons 2036: 1417: 65:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 3073:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 3042:Hi. We're into the last five days of the 2867:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 1766:You currently appear to be engaged in an 1621:So, yeah, you know how these work... »»»» 1427: 1242: 1143: 2390:User:C.m.jones/Wikipedia:I bid you adieu 2379:User:C.m.jones/Wikipedia:I bid you adieu 1922:???? I've never even heard of the guy!-- 1628:Thank you very much for your support in 2792:notice, but please explain why in your 2051:to which you were are a party has been 1493:template has been added to the article 75:Knowledge (XXG):Where to ask a question 2993:Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite 3096:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 2478:, all biographies should be based on 2284:Image:Usage share of web browsers.png 1665: 1632:, which closed with a final tally of 1578:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1319:strike it. Just some friendly advice. 1267:Hammer's failed request for adminship 7: 3003:Knowledge (XXG):The 10,000 Challenge 1791:among editors. If necessary, pursue 630:Thanks again, and happy editing :-) 1681:Hi Groggy Dice! Thank you for your 35:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 2781:deleted for any of several reasons 2769:because of the following concern: 1847:What we don't need is disarray! :) 1226:, I admit, a confusing situation. 671:Slightly disingenuous statement... 14: 3081:The article will be discussed at 2972:review the candidates' statements 2876:The article will be discussed at 1511:Knowledge (XXG)'s deletion policy 1154:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar 1137:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar 867:A credible independent biography. 741:Knowledge (XXG):Proposed deletion 300:The Chronicle of Higher Education 3059: 2911: 2852: 2453: 2040: 1761: 1606: 1447: 1421: 1296: 1243: 1144: 1825:that changes will be discussed. 411:you find the subject notable? 314: 2978:. For the Election committee, 2948:Arbitration Committee election 2939:ArbCom elections are now open! 2033:Request for mediation accepted 1434:Thank you for your support in 1289:With regards to your edits to 1119:Re : The Sorcerer's Cave close 1: 2988:13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 2739:15:13, 19 December 2010 (UTC) 2472:biographies of living persons 2144:as the mediator of the case? 1722: 1721: 1700: 1698: 1688: 1679: 1589:05:44, 11 February 2008 (UTC) 1533:, where it may be deleted if 1390:00:08, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 1368:23:37, 3 September 2007 (UTC) 1353:16:03, 3 September 2007 (UTC) 1331:06:03, 3 September 2007 (UTC) 788:20:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 766:19:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 748:16:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 725:19:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 706:22:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 684:20:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 651:00:16, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 610:21:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC) 422:List of direct-to-video films 348:Just left you a double thanks 230:OK. I might do that in time. 3031:00:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC) 2902:05:36, 18 January 2011 (UTC) 2718:HiGroggy dice, I've deleted 2714:05:34, 25 January 2010 (UTC) 2068:For the Mediation Committee, 1597: 1561:23:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 1471:19:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 1443:18:18, 20 October 2007 (UTC) 1420: 1409:21:12, 10 October 2007 (UTC) 1302: 1163: 1053:on the topic, as opposed to 1009:As a regular contributor to 580:22:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 563:01:07, 2 February 2007 (UTC) 549:16:05, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 539:Region"; "Département =: --> 528:22:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 489:17:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 441:04:24, 5 November 2006 (UTC) 416:18:14, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 395:04:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 302:, which is the best bet for 82:14:34, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 55:How to write a great article 2974:and submit your choices on 2839:10:08, 4 January 2011 (UTC) 2825:allows discussion to reach 2806:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 2789:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 2444:11:35, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 2421:10:09, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 1507:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 1446: 1309:01:08, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 1205:User:Groggy Dice/Abby Abadi 1071:they're even MORE prone to 615:Central America Assessments 513:21:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 470:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 456:I've nominated the article 3121: 3044:Women in Red World Contest 3037:Women in Red World Contest 2980:MediaWiki message delivery 2384:An editor has asked for a 2198:Thanks for your help with 1714:18:34, 31 March 2008 (UTC) 1650:20:09, 19 March 2008 (UTC) 1572:Talk:BattleTech#Comstar.3F 1400:Hi, thanks for supporting 1118: 1086:Thank you for your opinion 1080:01:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 1062:01:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 1031:18:37, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 1000:14:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 979:19:44, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 965:14:30, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 947:PRODing of romance authors 941:17:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 896:05:20, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 794:Historical Eastern Germany 315: 148:Sandinistas - Carla's Song 2811:proposed deletion process 2402:12:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 2334:User:Groggy Dice/Scarlett 2212:19:26, 25 June 2008 (UTC) 2188:09:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 2169:15:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC) 2079:09:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 2023:12:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 1993:02:02, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 1960:01:28, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 1938:19:37, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 1914:11:43, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 1899:13:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC) 1614: 1605: 1602: 1600: 1523:proposed deletion process 1277:17:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1249: 1231:14:54, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 1218:19:01, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1193:14:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 1169:14:53, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 1150: 1114:05:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 1095:08:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 814:04:26, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 367:05:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 342:21:01, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 322:20:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 273:07:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 260:06:43, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 235:11:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 214:09:43, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 197:08:50, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 182:08:02, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 168:22:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 157:20:53, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 140:23:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC) 119:07:42, 15 July 2006 (UTC) 103:07:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC) 3106:05:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC) 3075:or whether it should be 2933:23:26, 9 June 2012 (UTC) 2869:or whether it should be 2862:Free Rasalhague Republic 2846:Free Rasalhague Republic 2367:15:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC) 2346:20:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 2323:22:13, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 2277:15:06, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 2262:10:00, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 2233:00:41, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 1862:12:59, 6 June 2008 (UTC) 1810:01:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 1749:00:07, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 1527:speedy deletion criteria 1132:10:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 873:Commercial endorsements. 26:Hello, Groggy Dice, and 2798:the article's talk page 2637:José Francisco Cardenal 2498:tag. Here is the list: 2336:for you, as requested. 2200:Nicaragua Was Our Home‎ 2176:the mediation workspace 1683:participation in my RfA 1359:Babylon 5 Stub Template 1038:Central American Crisis 460:for deletion under the 3020:Ser Amantio di Nicolao 2758: 1675: 1503:criteria for inclusion 1484: 1100:Battletech Wikiproject 870:Wide name recognition. 2952:Arbitration Committee 2823:articles for deletion 2767:proposed for deletion 2757: 2049:Request for Mediation 1673: 1531:Articles for Deletion 1529:or it can be sent to 1483: 462:Articles for deletion 2377:Deletion review for 1458:Reality TV Precedent 1430:Thanks, Groggy Dice! 1050:Salvadoran civil war 554:Carr article and AfD 247:William Bradford AfD 147: 3068:The Succession Wars 3052:The Succession Wars 2956:arbitration process 2425: 1779:. If you continue, 1395: 1263:User:TenPoundHammer 1199:Abby Abadi userfied 384:TruthbringerToronto 267:CambridgeBayWeather 254:CambridgeBayWeather 3026:Lo dicono a Signa. 2968:arbitration policy 2815:deletion processes 2759: 2462:alerting you that 2430:Please respond to 1793:dispute resolution 1676: 1485: 1291:The Sleepover Club 1285:The Sleepover Club 1222:I restored it. It 656:Jordan Hasay Entry 544:page. Thankyou. -- 40:How to edit a page 2894: 2745:Proposed deletion 2700: 2633: 2566: 2449:Unreferenced BLPs 2344: 2088: 2087: 1777:three-revert rule 1772:three-revert rule 1732: 1731: 1659: 1658: 1655: 1654: 1622: 1549:Duchy of Andurien 1499:proposed deletion 1495:Duchy of Andurien 1490:proposed deletion 1476:Duchy of Andurien 1455: 1454: 1282: 1281: 1174: 1173: 1055:original research 954:Patricia Matthews 919:WP:PROD#Conflicts 902:is a process for 812: 649: 599:List of Bahrainis 3112: 3102: 3063: 3062: 3021: 2929: 2927: 2915: 2914: 2899: 2892: 2891: 2856: 2855: 2808: 2807: 2791: 2790: 2736: 2732: 2727: 2699: 2698: 2684: 2640: 2632: 2631: 2617: 2573: 2565: 2564: 2550: 2506: 2497: 2491: 2480:reliable sources 2457: 2432:Annoynmous' post 2426:Annoynmous' post 2340: 2328:Userfied article 2165: 2163: 2161: 2159: 2157: 2143: 2116:deleted contribs 2044: 2037: 1991: 1981: 1936: 1926: 1895: 1893: 1891: 1889: 1887: 1807: 1770:. Note that the 1765: 1728: 1726: 1725: 1719: 1717: 1712: 1696: 1666: 1620: 1616: 1610: 1598: 1586: 1584: 1546: 1540: 1516: 1451: 1425: 1418: 1388: 1378: 1351: 1341: 1306: 1300: 1273: 1272:Ten Pound Hammer 1247: 1240: 1239: 1191: 1181: 1165: 1148: 1141: 1140: 1027: 1022: 939: 929: 806: 786: 776: 704: 694: 631: 449:AfD Nomination: 402:William Guy Carr 364: 318: 317: 137: 124:Thanks 1632-stub 79:Fingers-of-Pyrex 3120: 3119: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3104: 3100: 3092: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3040: 3029: 3019: 2995: 2976:the voting page 2942: 2925: 2923: 2912: 2909: 2897: 2887: 2857: 2853: 2850: 2819:speedy deletion 2805: 2804: 2788: 2787: 2763:Fernando Agüero 2752: 2749:Fernando Agüero 2734: 2730: 2725: 2720:Sigifredo Ochoa 2641: 2574: 2570:Fernando Agüero 2507: 2503:Sigifredo Ochoa 2495: 2493:unreferencedBLP 2489: 2451: 2428: 2409: 2386:deletion review 2382: 2374: 2355: 2330: 2287: 2243: 2222: 2196: 2155: 2153: 2151: 2149: 2147: 2101: 2095: 2035: 1983: 1979: 1928: 1924: 1885: 1883: 1881: 1879: 1877: 1872: 1759: 1737: 1711: 1705:CobaltBlueTony™ 1703: 1664: 1596: 1587: 1582: 1576: 1568: 1553:Judgesurreal777 1544: 1538: 1514: 1478: 1464:deletion review 1460: 1432: 1416: 1398: 1380: 1376: 1361: 1343: 1339: 1316: 1301: 1287: 1271: 1238: 1201: 1183: 1179: 1139: 1121: 1109:. Thanks alot. 1102: 1088: 1042: 1025: 1020: 1007: 993:discussion page 989: 949: 931: 927: 844: 842:Contested PRODs 821: 796: 778: 774: 755: 753:Explain Tokkien 737: 696: 692: 673: 658: 648: 636: 617: 602: 597:PROD delete at 590: 587:Famous Muhajirs 585:PROD delete at 570: 556: 535: 520: 498: 474:Deletion policy 454: 425: 405: 400:PROD delete at 376: 362: 350: 320: 291:Clarence Thomas 249: 150: 135: 126: 89: 60:Manual of Style 19: 12: 11: 5: 3118: 3116: 3094: 3058: 3057: 3055: 3050:Nomination of 3048: 3039: 3034: 3023: 2994: 2991: 2945: 2941: 2936: 2908: 2905: 2851: 2849: 2844:Nomination of 2842: 2829:for deletion. 2809:will stop the 2777: 2776: 2751: 2742: 2702: 2701: 2634: 2567: 2450: 2447: 2427: 2424: 2408: 2405: 2381: 2375: 2373: 2370: 2354: 2349: 2329: 2326: 2307:Justin (koavf) 2286: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2242: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2221: 2218: 2216: 2195: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2094: 2089: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2062: 2056: 2045: 2034: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1917: 1916: 1871: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1849: 1848: 1844: 1843: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1833: 1829: 1826: 1823: 1820: 1758: 1752: 1736: 1733: 1730: 1729: 1720: 1718: 1707: 1697: 1693: 1691: 1677: 1674:I can has mop? 1663: 1660: 1657: 1656: 1653: 1652: 1645: 1642: 1625: 1624: 1612: 1611: 1604: 1601: 1595: 1592: 1575: 1567: 1564: 1547:to the top of 1515:{{dated prod}} 1477: 1474: 1459: 1456: 1453: 1452: 1445: 1440:Hiberniantears 1433: 1428: 1426: 1415: 1412: 1397: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1360: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1315: 1312: 1295: 1286: 1283: 1280: 1279: 1259: 1258: 1250: 1248: 1237: 1234: 1200: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1172: 1171: 1157: 1156: 1151: 1149: 1138: 1135: 1120: 1117: 1101: 1098: 1087: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1041: 1034: 1006: 1003: 988: 983: 982: 981: 976:Cornell Rockey 962:Cornell Rockey 948: 945: 944: 943: 914: 913: 909: 908: 877: 876: 875: 874: 871: 868: 865: 862: 843: 840: 837: 820: 817: 795: 792: 791: 790: 754: 751: 745:Walter Görlitz 736: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 717: 709: 708: 672: 669: 657: 654: 638: 634: 616: 613: 601: 595: 589: 583: 574:Angus McLellan 569: 566: 555: 552: 534: 531: 519: 516: 497: 492: 453: 447: 445: 424: 419: 404: 398: 375: 370: 349: 346: 345: 344: 335:Captainktainer 326: 325: 324: 312: 248: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 238: 237: 221: 220: 219: 218: 217: 216: 202: 201: 200: 199: 187: 186: 185: 184: 171: 170: 149: 146: 144: 125: 122: 88: 85: 71:sign your name 63: 62: 57: 52: 47: 42: 37: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3117: 3108: 3107: 3103: 3097: 3091: 3087: 3084: 3078: 3074: 3070: 3069: 3053: 3049: 3047: 3045: 3038: 3035: 3033: 3032: 3028: 3027: 3022: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2992: 2990: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2940: 2937: 2935: 2934: 2931: 2930: 2919: 2906: 2904: 2903: 2900: 2895: 2890: 2882: 2879: 2874: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2863: 2847: 2843: 2841: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2801: 2799: 2795: 2784: 2782: 2775: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2768: 2764: 2756: 2750: 2746: 2743: 2741: 2740: 2737: 2733: 2728: 2721: 2716: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2697: 2693: 2690: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2672: 2669: 2666: 2663: 2660: 2657: 2654: 2651: 2647: 2644: 2643:Find sources: 2638: 2635: 2630: 2626: 2623: 2620: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2605: 2602: 2599: 2596: 2593: 2590: 2587: 2584: 2580: 2577: 2576:Find sources: 2571: 2568: 2563: 2559: 2556: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2538: 2535: 2532: 2529: 2526: 2523: 2520: 2517: 2513: 2510: 2509:Find sources: 2504: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2494: 2487: 2486: 2481: 2477: 2476:verifiability 2473: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2456: 2448: 2446: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2423: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2406: 2404: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2380: 2376: 2371: 2369: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2353: 2350: 2348: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2327: 2325: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2302: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2285: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2250: 2248: 2240: 2234: 2231: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2219: 2217: 2214: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2167: 2166: 2141: 2138: 2135: 2132: 2129: 2126: 2123: 2120: 2117: 2114: 2111: 2108: 2105: 2100: 2093: 2090: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2069: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2060: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2043: 2039: 2038: 2032: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1897: 1896: 1870: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1850: 1846: 1845: 1841: 1840: 1834: 1830: 1827: 1824: 1821: 1817: 1816: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1808: 1806: 1803: 1800: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1784: 1778: 1773: 1769: 1764: 1756: 1753: 1751: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1734: 1727: 1724: 1716: 1715: 1710: 1706: 1699: 1695: 1687: 1686: 1684: 1678: 1672: 1668: 1667: 1661: 1651: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1643: 1640: 1635: 1631: 1630:my recent RfA 1627: 1626: 1623: 1618: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1599: 1593: 1591: 1590: 1585: 1579: 1573: 1565: 1563: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1543: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1519:its talk page 1512: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1491: 1482: 1475: 1473: 1472: 1469: 1465: 1457: 1450: 1444: 1441: 1437: 1431: 1424: 1419: 1413: 1411: 1410: 1407: 1403: 1396:Bearian's RfA 1391: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1366: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1323: 1313: 1311: 1310: 1307: 1305: 1299: 1292: 1284: 1278: 1274: 1268: 1264: 1261: 1260: 1257: 1256: 1251: 1246: 1241: 1235: 1233: 1232: 1229: 1225: 1220: 1219: 1216: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1177:Thanks! :) -- 1176: 1175: 1170: 1167: 1166: 1159: 1158: 1155: 1152: 1147: 1142: 1136: 1134: 1133: 1130: 1129:Mailer Diablo 1126: 1116: 1115: 1112: 1108: 1099: 1097: 1096: 1093: 1085: 1081: 1078: 1074: 1069: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1060: 1056: 1051: 1047: 1039: 1035: 1033: 1032: 1029: 1028: 1023: 1016: 1012: 1004: 1002: 1001: 998: 997:58.107.15.245 994: 987: 984: 980: 977: 972: 969: 968: 967: 966: 963: 959: 955: 946: 942: 938: 934: 930: 924: 920: 916: 915: 911: 910: 905: 900: 899: 898: 897: 894: 890: 888: 881: 872: 869: 866: 863: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 854: 849: 841: 839: 835: 832: 830: 824: 818: 816: 815: 810: 805: 801: 793: 789: 785: 781: 777: 770: 769: 768: 767: 764: 760: 752: 750: 749: 746: 742: 735: 732: 726: 723: 718: 713: 712: 711: 710: 707: 703: 699: 695: 688: 687: 686: 685: 682: 678: 677:was withdrawn 670: 668: 665: 661: 660:Groggy Dice, 655: 653: 652: 646: 642: 637: 628: 624: 622: 614: 612: 611: 608: 600: 596: 594: 588: 584: 582: 581: 578: 575: 567: 565: 564: 561: 553: 551: 550: 547: 543: 533:Using English 532: 530: 529: 526: 525:Pascal.Tesson 517: 515: 514: 511: 507: 503: 496: 493: 491: 490: 487: 486:GringoInChile 483: 479: 475: 471: 467: 463: 459: 452: 448: 446: 443: 442: 438: 434: 430: 423: 420: 418: 417: 414: 410: 403: 399: 397: 396: 393: 389: 385: 381: 374: 371: 369: 368: 365: 360: 359: 354: 347: 343: 340: 336: 332: 327: 323: 319: 316:Contributions 310: 305: 301: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 275: 274: 271: 268: 264: 263: 262: 261: 258: 255: 246: 236: 233: 229: 228: 227: 226: 225: 224: 223: 222: 215: 212: 208: 207: 206: 205: 204: 203: 198: 195: 191: 190: 189: 188: 183: 180: 175: 174: 173: 172: 169: 166: 161: 160: 159: 158: 155: 145: 142: 141: 138: 133: 132: 123: 121: 120: 117: 114: 110: 105: 104: 101: 98: 94: 86: 84: 83: 80: 76: 72: 68: 61: 58: 56: 53: 51: 48: 46: 43: 41: 38: 36: 33: 32: 31: 29: 24: 23: 16: 3093: 3088: 3080: 3066: 3054:for deletion 3041: 3025: 2996: 2943: 2921: 2910: 2888: 2883: 2875: 2860: 2859:The article 2858: 2848:for deletion 2831:Cumbriangirl 2817:exist. The 2813:, but other 2802: 2794:edit summary 2785: 2778: 2774:Not notable. 2773: 2761:The article 2760: 2723: 2717: 2703: 2691: 2685: 2677: 2670: 2664: 2658: 2652: 2642: 2624: 2618: 2610: 2603: 2597: 2591: 2585: 2575: 2557: 2551: 2543: 2536: 2530: 2524: 2518: 2508: 2483: 2463: 2452: 2429: 2410: 2383: 2356: 2331: 2303: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2288: 2251: 2244: 2215: 2204:Steve Dufour 2197: 2146: 2136: 2130: 2124: 2118: 2112: 2106: 2096: 2067: 2010: 1984: 1929: 1876: 1873: 1804: 1801: 1798: 1785:from editing 1780: 1760: 1738: 1723: 1701: 1689: 1680: 1639: 1638: 1633: 1619: 1569: 1488: 1486: 1461: 1429: 1399: 1381: 1362: 1344: 1320: 1317: 1314:your comment 1303: 1297: 1288: 1252: 1223: 1221: 1202: 1184: 1162: 1153: 1125:Best regards 1124: 1122: 1103: 1089: 1077:Lawikitejana 1067: 1059:Lawikitejana 1043: 1018: 1008: 990: 986:Robert Komer 970: 950: 932: 922: 903: 886: 882: 878: 845: 836: 833: 825: 822: 797: 779: 756: 738: 697: 676: 674: 666: 662: 659: 629: 625: 618: 603: 591: 571: 557: 536: 521: 518:About my RfA 499: 455: 444: 426: 408: 406: 377: 356: 351: 330: 303: 294: 282: 278: 250: 151: 143: 129: 127: 106: 90: 64: 25: 21: 20: 2668:free images 2601:free images 2534:free images 2249:, point 5. 1980:Groggy Dice 1925:Groggy Dice 1781:you may be 1570:Please see 1377:Groggy Dice 1340:Groggy Dice 1228:Daniel Case 1180:Groggy Dice 1164:Wikidudeman 1015:quite a few 928:Groggy Dice 904:uncontested 848:K. K. Dodds 775:Groggy Dice 759:John Ruskin 693:Groggy Dice 607:Maustrauser 568:Joachim AfD 482:Liza Wright 466:Liza Wright 458:Liza Wright 451:Liza Wright 380:Liza Wright 373:Liza Wright 211:Groggy Dice 165:Groggy Dice 87:Lynn Willis 3101:reply here 2964:topic bans 2898:Talk to me 2290:No rushing 2230:annoynmous 2134:block user 2128:filter log 1685:(87/3/3). 1594:RfA Thanks 1414:RfA Thanks 1040:article... 838:Wiki Raja 804:Hrödberäht 331:in general 287:Anita Hill 67:Wikipedian 45:Help pages 2960:site bans 2889:D O N D E 2827:consensus 2765:has been 2704:Thanks!-- 2140:block log 1789:consensus 1542:db-author 1535:consensus 1107:talk page 1092:Snake BGD 1036:Like the 923:contested 893:Dialogue? 429:Night Gyr 392:contribs) 285:based on 69:! Please 2997:Hi. The 2893:groovily 2735:Chequers 2338:Tony Fox 2110:contribs 2053:accepted 2015:Student7 1952:Student7 1906:Student7 1854:Student7 1768:edit war 1741:Student7 1634:(75/1/0) 1603:Thanks! 1365:Skaraoke 1304:Islander 1111:NeoFreak 1075:issues. 1046:Cold War 889:Ganymead 887:*Exeunt* 809:gespräch 763:Chivista 722:Blueboar 621:the page 560:Blueboar 510:Tyrenius 413:Blueboar 265:Thanks. 50:Tutorial 22:Welcome! 3077:deleted 2871:deleted 2706:DASHBot 2674:WP refs 2662:scholar 2607:WP refs 2595:scholar 2540:WP refs 2528:scholar 2436:Dweller 2413:Dweller 2407:Contras 2394:Martinp 2359:Dweller 2269:Dweller 2254:Dweller 2241:Contras 2220:Contras 2194:Thankss 2180:Dweller 2099:Dweller 1783:blocked 1755:Contras 1735:Contras 1566:ComStar 1468:Gamer83 1406:Bearian 1236:Thanks! 823:Hello, 734:Mgmbill 715::: --> 681:MSJapan 667:fizbin 502:WP:NPOV 28:welcome 17:Welcome 2950:. The 2928:jones 2796:or on 2646:Google 2579:Google 2512:Google 2470:. The 2342:(arf!) 2294:within 2071:Daniel 1950:Good! 1832:long). 1802:ndonic 1662:My RfA 1509:" and 1436:my RfA 1402:my RfA 1209:WP:DRV 1011:WP:DSI 958:WP:BIO 853:WP:BIO 577:(Talk) 283:delete 270:(Talk) 257:(Talk) 113:Kchase 97:Kchase 2731:Spiel 2689:JSTOR 2650:books 2622:JSTOR 2583:books 2555:JSTOR 2516:books 2298:below 1819:them. 1795:. · 1583:talk 971:reply 802:. -- 645:EDITS 633:SRICE 495:Domai 232:Atavi 194:Atavi 179:Atavi 154:Atavi 3005:and 2984:talk 2835:talk 2726:Ϣere 2710:talk 2682:FENS 2656:news 2615:FENS 2589:news 2548:FENS 2522:news 2440:talk 2417:talk 2398:talk 2363:talk 2273:talk 2258:talk 2208:talk 2184:talk 2122:logs 2104:talk 2075:talk 2019:talk 1956:talk 1910:talk 1858:talk 1745:talk 1709:talk 1644:fold 1641:Hers 1557:talk 1327:talk 1068:P.S. 1021:Baka 1005:note 829:here 743:. -- 641:TALK 542:here 506:WP:V 504:and 472:and 433:talk 388:Talk 353:here 339:Talk 304:real 295:know 279:keep 2944:Hi, 2924:Ron 2920:. 2747:of 2696:TWL 2629:TWL 2562:TWL 2485:700 2460:bot 2388:of 2372:DRV 2011:saw 1574:.-- 1551:. 1322:DGG 1298:The 1275:• 1255:RFA 1253:My 1213:DES 1073:POV 1026:man 546:Bob 538:--> 409:why 363:nkB 358:Fra 309:Ted 136:nkB 131:Fra 93:AfD 3079:. 2986:) 2962:, 2873:. 2837:) 2800:. 2783:. 2712:) 2676:) 2639:- 2609:) 2572:- 2542:) 2505:- 2496:}} 2490:{{ 2442:) 2419:) 2400:) 2365:) 2321:☯ 2275:) 2260:) 2210:) 2186:) 2164:te 2162:ai 2160:hw 2158:et 2156:tl 2154:os 2150:an 2148:Ry 2077:) 2047:A 2021:) 1987:| 1958:) 1932:| 1912:) 1894:te 1892:ai 1890:hw 1888:et 1886:tl 1884:os 1880:an 1878:Ry 1860:) 1747:) 1702:- 1559:) 1545:}} 1539:{{ 1487:A 1466:. 1384:| 1347:| 1329:) 1224:is 1187:| 1127:, 1057:. 935:| 891:| 831:: 782:| 761:? 700:| 643:| 635:13 508:. 439:) 437:Oy 390:| 337:* 3098:| 2982:( 2926:h 2833:( 2708:( 2692:· 2686:· 2678:· 2671:· 2665:· 2659:· 2653:· 2648:( 2625:· 2619:· 2611:· 2604:· 2598:· 2592:· 2586:· 2581:( 2558:· 2552:· 2544:· 2537:· 2531:· 2525:· 2519:· 2514:( 2464:3 2438:( 2415:( 2396:( 2361:( 2319:M 2317:☺ 2315:C 2313:☮ 2311:T 2309:❤ 2271:( 2256:( 2206:( 2182:( 2152:P 2142:) 2137:· 2131:· 2125:· 2119:· 2113:· 2107:· 2102:( 2073:( 2061:. 2055:. 2017:( 1989:C 1985:T 1954:( 1934:C 1930:T 1908:( 1882:P 1856:( 1805:O 1799:A 1757:. 1743:( 1580:| 1555:( 1386:C 1382:T 1349:C 1345:T 1325:( 1189:C 1185:T 937:C 933:T 811:) 807:( 784:C 780:T 716:) 702:C 698:T 647:) 639:( 435:/ 431:( 386:( 311:/ 116:T 100:T

Index

welcome
The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Wikipedian
sign your name
Knowledge (XXG):Where to ask a question
Fingers-of-Pyrex
14:34, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
AfD
Kchase
T
07:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Lynn Willis
Kchase
T
07:42, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Fra
nkB
23:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Atavi
20:53, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Groggy Dice
22:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Atavi
08:02, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Atavi

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.