User talk:Graeme Bartlett/archive 11

389:.) Their lead singer has been in at least three other bands that have Knowledge (XXG) pages - Emarosa, In Fear and Faith, and Greeley Estates, which makes him notable for his participation in those supposedly notable bands, as well as enhancing their notability by their having once included a member who is now in a band whose star is rising. The Word Alive has played Warped Tour, Bamboozle, and tours nationwide. There are multiple references to the band in Revolver magazine, HM (Hard Music) Magazine, AltPress, MetalHammer, We Are Hunted, Kik Axe Music, Metal Underground, Absolute Punk, and elsewhere. They are known to last.fm (1,008,165 plays by 82,368 listeners). The Empire EP landed them #15 on Billboard's Heatseakers chart and #10 on the Alternative New Artist Chart. In terms of followers, their Facebook page has over 10,000, and they also have followers on MySpace, Twitter, YouTube and other social sites. All in all, I think there is adequate notability for a Knowledge (XXG) page -- without the added argument that they are clearly more notable than several other bands with pages, and those bands' pages are not routine targets for deletion. 2459:

can see on my account) I have been active on a fairly regular basis since 2006 (save for very little activity actually on the account in 2007). Lately, I have been better about remembering to login when I make changes so they are actually credited to me instead of a rotating IP address. Is there some kind of problem with my contributions listing from your end? I'd appreciate any help in sorting it out. Recently I've been more active and I've been doing more to figure out all of the tools and features so that I can contribute the best way I can. I will de-nominate myself for adminship if the trend continues towards opposition and possibly try again in the future when I have a better grasp of the finer technical points of the Knowledge (XXG) system. Thanks again for your input.

3863:

about it, so I decided to explicitly write what it is so that other people outside myself can understand it better. I was in the process of creating an online reference center via Wiki. I was not finished. I still have a lot fo work todo but right now I have to establish a foothold. And that foothold begins with keeping a page for Universal absolutism that is separate from regular Absolutism or regular Universalism, since there are multiple versions of each, and Universal Absolutism is very specific in what it partains to. I would like to at least know the reason why you in specific chose to delete the page and what we can do to bring it to where it needs to be with all the credit its due. How do we get that done? demostheneskostapapasjr

2875:. That helps clarify - that all rights have not been released. So I think that means that I filled out the image template correctly. (I don't think it's necessary to try to persuade the organization to release any additional rights) The one possible image template change that comes to mind is to change the sentence "Appears to lack copyright, but this is not explicitly stated" to read something like "No copyright is claimed within the book, but neither is there any explicit statement about the work being in the public domain." Do you think the latter sentence would be preferable to the former (current) sentence? (file is 2182:

MF:Johannes Hendericus van der Meulen 19 Nov 1809 L MFF:Bouwe Ydes van der Meulen 12 dec 1756 L MFFF:Yde Bouwes van der Meulen MFFM:Aafke Douwes Gorter MFM:Antje Paulus Haitsma 11 november 1778 F MFMF:Paulus Haitsma MFMM:Janneke van der Meulen MM:Sjoukje Faber MMF:Yme S Faber 8 Apr 1779 F MMFF:Sipke Faber MMFM:Martha Ymes MMM:Sjoukje Romar 29 februari 1784 F MMMF:Paulus Romar apoteker MMMM:Sjoukje Ottes Salverda 8 april 1750 F MMMMF:Otte Lucas Salverda MMMMM:Trijntie Johannes Oosterbaen

31: 2946:) has a notice at the bottom stating "Copyright © 2010 Idaho National Laboratory". I'm sorry for my mistake, I have to admit I don't have a great understanding of how the whole US government pd thing works and assumed if the organisation could copyright one thing then anything else they produced wouldn't be automatically in the public domain. I apologise for the inconvenience and will seek advice before placing such tags in the future, the tags I placed on 4067: 3980: 3945: 3795: 2084: 1599: 1877: 3199:

doesn't exist. And as for the place you suggest it is close to - while I don't deny it exists - its nothing at all except an area of blanket bog near the little roadway that happens to have a name. I think you should put my markers back on because as you live in the Netherlands and I live in North Mayo I know this is a farce and is not true. Somebody will be having a good laugh at you for believing this nonsense.

3333: 3769:) to be blocked until June 29 of this year. I would prefer if the ability to edit their respective talkpages was also blocked, but they were still able to e-mail, but I don't mind if this ability is also removed. If you are willing to accept this request, could you please let me know before you implement the block so I can put appropriate notices on my userpage and talkpage? Thanks for your time. -- 3619:, is quite notable for inviting people to watch and appreciate forgotten, cult-like, missed and soon-to-be-missed films. The content and breath of their episodes is wide, going in depth within many aspects of a film from its production to its significance at the time of release and how well it has held up today. Many Knowledge (XXG) entries of films they have covered now have links to their episodes. 3163:) I started today because you said it had enough claims for no speedy delete. I stared a very similar article stub today and it got the same SD tag but it was deleted quickly (within nine hours) even though it had more info re: importance than the article you saved. The article was on German stage, television, and film actress Antje Thiele. Here is the article archived on my user page: 672: 600: 2852:

the (name of organization that prints it) for additional copies of this publication, which may be used and reprinted without special permission." I wasn't sure exactly how this should be configured, or whether this means they do NOT have a copyright (nothing about copyright is mentioned in searching the downloadable version). The image in question is

3008: 3566: 797:'s article which has been deleted last month and currently ready to create a completely new article on the same topic with sufficient citations and references. Would it be OK to move on and start wrtining the article? or would there be anything I need to do beforehand since my article was deleted previously? Thanks. 2229: 4202:

Sorry about not signing, I've done it thousands of times now, I should know better. Thanks for taking the time to look at that article for me, Im just a little concerned. I Noticed that a Rollbacker (tommy2010) using huggle is reverting (last time I checked) an enormous amount of pages, 80% of them,

2904:

Thank you for your help on the Jacki Randall page. I've been trying to find some fresh links to replace the newly dead, but still struggling. I am new to this and having some difficulty navigating. I wonder if you could please help me with posting a photo for this bio. What I tried to upload is this;

2458:

Thank you for your input. Rollback rights are more what I was looking for - it seems I didn't adequately research this prior to nominating myself. I am, however, confused about your comment that I have only been active since April of this year. According to my user contributions (at least from what I

2181:

FFFM: Huberdina Servaas ~1747 d jan 1810 FFM:Minke Elzinga FM:Grietje Hamstra, geboren 12 juni 1811 L FMF:Coenrad Hamstra Geboren op 10 april 1785 L FMFF:Albert Jennes Hamstra FMFM:Grietie Pieters Wijnbergen b ~1749 FMM:Truyke Berkenbijl M:Antje van der Meulen, geboren 21 april 1842 F

1160:

I'd like to request the page for We Are The In Crowd to be reviewed and restored. They were originally deleted for not being a notable band and then locked for being recreated. However, this band is notable. They are signed to a reputable label, tour nationally on high profile tours, have releases on

572:

Yes I am Bill E from NYCSubway. That's how I was able to upload the full original version of the photo. There is nothing I can do about adding any notices on the nycsubway.org website since I do not own it; however I have added a note that I submit photos to nycsubway.org on my username page. I don't

4018:

I find myself in disagreement with your decline of the speedy on this page. We should not have pages, even as redirects, perpetuating random gratuitous scatological punning alleged nicknames of seminotable people. Would you be willing to reconsider your view on this? I really hesitate either to give

3336:

was the search that I used to find the text. The author has obviously copy/pasted then changed words around. It's in that gray area of looking the same because it obviously shares the same info and a copyright issue. I just wanted you to know so that you don't think I'm a deletion hungry editor.

2495:

template. My own searches were unable to find any magazines that covered the topic at all, or any reliable books that appeared to give any significant coverage to the topic. Certainly the article itself doesn't provide any such sources. Hence I reverted your removal of the template. If you could let

1445:

Well per WP:MUSICBIO her song can just be in rotation, or and press releases are reprinted our publications where she talks about herself. And about the 12 hour thing, the user who nominated it for deletion the second time re-nominated it less than 12 hours after deletion was declined! It was on the

236:

I believe the previous version was deleted less than 15 minutes before the creation of this one. It could've been an hour and 15 min.; daylight savings time is confusing my understanding of my watchlist history. That's the main source of my curiosity. I didn't think the creator had enough time to

2851:

Hello Graeme, many thanks for your help a few weeks ago about uploading book covers, which has guided me to successfully uploading several. Today I encountered a puzzle: How to properly record the cover of a book that is freely downloadable from the internet, and bears the statement "Please contact

1528:

If everything looks OK, I may use it as my personal prototype for uploading a few other book covers to illustrate other book articles in the next few weeks. (NB: I can see some details in the actual book cover that are not visible in the uploaded scan, confirming the lower-resolultion). Many thanks

149:

I am truly sorry that I did not complain before the deletion of the Eurocsys article, the reason was that I was amazed that your policies allow all Vegas Hotels or Porno magazines to “inform” their clients their background, but not a foundation dedicated to fund and provide education and technology

3862:

Alright Demostheneskostapapasjr working on online definition of Universal Absolutism, and all the information to it. The US army considers it to be a religion, and it is written on my military issued Government verified Dog tags. I am wondering why there is no internet place to go to find out more

358:

Why was the article deleted? They're a noteworthy band at this point, and I believe said band deserves an article here on Knowledge (XXG). It should NOT be deleted. Maybe when it was first made and they weren't so noteworthy then it could be deleted, but since they're getting out there and getting

3198:

I think you must be very gullible if you think Boytown is marked on Google maps. Anybody can mark things like this and then save it and put in on any site they like. However, if you go into Google Earth directly and search this area for Boytown, I can guarantee you, you won't find it because it

1327:

from being created again, which at the time was a good move. However, I began to make the article on one of my userpages. When I felt like it was good enough for the mainspace I tried to move it and couldn't. I requested a move and I got no response. So since it was ultimately your call could you

458:

I won't copy paste the title, but according to google translate, the title of the page is "Category: WikiProject Music" in farsi, and the page text itself is unclear, but appears to be advertising for a band, although on second look maybe for a new music wiki. I didn't just tag it because it's

1484:

It appears that, probably unknowing to the person who started the DRV, the old article was for a completely different game than the one the person wanted to have a page on (and I found sources for). Not sure if this means it should be deleted again, or simply changed completely in user space,

380:

I would like to second the motion that this band is sufficiently noteworthy to be on Knowledge (XXG) and should be "undeleted". (If nothing else, I can cite a dozen similar bands with lesser accomplishments and notability that have pages here.) However, on their own merit, this band should be

3659:

I consider it's deletion premature and request that it's deletion be reconsidered. It's initial entry was quite short and thus lacked significance. But it was intended as a stepping stone, as are many other entries on Knowledge (XXG), to expand it's content and context. It is, from what I've

3417:

Re this one, fair enough not a speedy, but the references you have supplied so far are from a website/blog that describes itself as 'unofficial site of your local league'. The club itself is sponsored by its local pub. This an amateur team playing in a local league and falls short of meeting

1500:

Well the person, who I though was User:Make is free to change it in anyway they wish as it is a userspace draft. So it can become a completely different game article (rather than the one it started with) and if others want to have an article on another game with the same name, we will need

3540:

Only in so far as that is where they are loaded from. Most software can be found on the web somewhere, but that does not put it in the category of web content. If it is not just part of a web site, but is intended to be downloaded and run on a computer then I don't count as web content.

1521:

Hello Graeme, I just uploaded a photo of a book cover to illustrate an article on the book. Since you seem to have experience on this topic (you were helpful on another photo last November), I was wondering if, when you get a chance, you could check out that I've done everything right:

1161:

Amazon and iTunes, and are covered regularly in national print and online press. Their merchandise is sold through major retailers like Glamour Kills and Hot Topic. They are also endorsed by major companies like Fender and Ernie Ball. Below are a few of the links covering the band.

3123:

It did not look as if it was going to become a suitable article with a claim of importance, Do you want to have the article as a userspace draft, where it won't be deleted so fast? at User:Ukirednffc/The Chlenstvo Brothehood Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:15, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

4019:

further publicity to this nonsense with a 7-day RFD discussion, or to unilaterally invoke the hardcore aspect of the BLP policy, which seem to be the two alternative next steps open to me, but I'm not very comfortable leaving that redirect sitting around, either.

4310:

You are right that is what the procedure says. Well I requested the reduce, and I was happy with the result. Anyway if anyone wants the big version back please say so. (earlier I recued from speedy delete of the whole thing due to mislicense when FUR would do).

919:

hello graeme, if thats your real name, i would just like to say your opinion in the speedy deletion of nathan Konarski has resulted in his death. I hope your proud because I sure am not proud to call YOU an Auzzy , Cheers mate shuve it up your clit! AvalonKids

2049:

About the page for Taylor Dinsmore, i spent maybe an hour working on it last night. i didnt have the time to refrence all the facts about his life, nor was i able to include why he is important. please send me that page, so i can futher edit it. thanks :)

1990:

is coming across as a legitimate exploration of the correct process for this situation, as opposed to contentiousness. I think it is a fascinating issue. (We may also have to address File:Secmarilla Bandera.png, but I'm less concerned about the image.)

4157:

I'm aware that RC patrollers are only allowed to revert articles if it is clearcut Vandalisum. Would you be able to look at the Diff of the article (the link i gave you there) and let me know in that event whether that really is clear cut vandalisum.

1116:

Did you check the users talk page history? I certainly warned them several times, but the IP blanked his talk page in between. Sorry for bringing it up again I just want to check whether I actually hadn't given enough warnings for next time. PS, see

4229:

No Problem, So do you mean that you can issue a wraning first and then leave it at that? I mean Yer removing chunks of articles isnt quite oviouse vandalisum but it is a little sus. otherwise you could just click the revert without warning button?

4152:

Howdy, My name is James and Im an RC patroller. I'm sorry to pull you away from your work, just wanted to ask a question to someone more experienced. I refere you to this article which was recently rolledback using huggle by an RC patroller.

3000: 2144:

people known. I included their ethnicity in their articles but it was removed because the editor said it was controversial and I needed to give a source? Could you please look into this? It looks a bit strange to me! Kind regards,

500:

Oh, never mind! I can resolve this one at today's CP board without a ticket #. I've had a look at the source, and I see it is now licensed properly there. I'll restore the text, attribute on the article face and mark it done. :)

642:

I was just wondering - is the Juan SaltSinker only blocked at ENWP due to your block, or are all accounts with this name blocked? The main reason I brought up the case was that I got the impression he was cross-wiki spamming.

2605:

and is highly discouraged. A first name may not seem such a detailed piece of information, but given the context of the discussion, it is sufficient for other editors to know that the editor in question has a very definite

3729:

Hi. I was wondering if I could make a request for my account to be blocked for a few weeks to remove any temptation for me to edit during what will be a very busy time for me in real life. I noticed your name in the

2401:

That was my first image categorizing, I think, sorry I had it wrong... all I could tell from the flag was that it wasn't right. My ignorance is reduced. Hopefully I'll get it right on future images. Thanks again. -

1184: 2601:) was doing you a favor when he replaced a real-life name with an editor's Knowledge (XXG) name. Identifying Knowledge (XXG) editors by their real name, when they have not done so themselves first, is considered 1065:

on the 15th. His attitude, and this particular topic interest (bacon), reminds me of the attitude and one of the non-controversial interests of a certain user who was banned a few days before this one turned up.

1457:

I'm talking about the first time it was declined, not on that revision of the talk page, the one before the 2nd nomination was started. Then I think it was the Bongo user that re-nominated it less than 12 hrs.

4203:

an example such as the one I showed you which was not clear cut vandalisum. I'm just thought I would raise the issue due to the fact that I've heard that huggle can cause alot of harm is used incorrectly.

1415:

1 Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves, and all advertising that mentions the musician or ensemble, including manufacturers' advertising.

3924:

Note: I just asked this of CactusWriter before I saw you declined the deletion. The copy is apparently copied from Knowledge (XXG), but only licensed under GFDL, so as it stands it's still a copyvio per

3735: 1420:

Works comprising merely trivial coverage, such as articles that simply report performance dates, release information or track listings, or the publications of contact and booking details in directories.

819:

I had just started creating the page yesterday and did not have time to finish it in one go. Can you please atleast send me a copy of the page so I can fully finish it and then post it all at one time?

1987: 3451:

Yes, the club exists, but they do not show notability. There are no 'good ones', the club is a local district team, playing in a local district league with many GHits of results in the local press.

686:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 359:

recognized and touring with bands on a bigger scale, as well as having an EP out and they're recording a full-length, they need the article. The Word Alive's article should NOT be deleted. --

1745:

based upon the g-hits you found. I belive the results have shown that your inclination was the correct one. Perhaps you might visit the article and let me know if it being improved from

172:. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Thanks, 697:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

3096:

My article was deleted but it wasn't finished! I pressed save page by mistake and didn't have the chance to respond to your speedy deletion list in time - please re-consider this!

3306:

Unfortunately this time there are 33 revisions with problems, and lots if intermediate edits, so it will just have to stay. Deleting the revisions will cause attribution problems.

868: 4084: 3993: 3958: 2097: 1616: 4331:

Hi you revised my article and put it on hold because it was lacking reliable source. I have added those, but the article is still put on hold. What can I do now to publish it?

3026:

It may be best not to include it as a reverence, but if a book picks a topic it indicates notability, even if it is useless as a source (in this case). 09:13, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

193:

I'm gonna assume that you declined the speedy on this article since you proded it. I'm just curious if the present version is different from the previously deleted version?

3269:

Good you spotted the change, my first attempt at this revision hiding, I have been off watching TV. You are way down the list of people who misspell my name, so no worries!

2856:, and I've already embedded it in the article about the book. But have I put in the proper text to document the image, or should I change it somehow? Many thanks in advance. 169: 158: 3608:(Article about a web site, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject). 3057:(I think they're beautiful logos, but) In Knowledge (XXG), video game's articles discouraged to use logo for game, encourage to upload boxart. So, I follow the guideline. 3035:

I've had that userbox for a while now; I thought the policies were unfair when I put it up, but I guess I can take it down now. I've reconsidered upon studying them more.

614: 520: 459:

foreign though--I think that given the translations, speedy's still appropriate. Doesn't really matter either way, but in case you revisit it, something to keep in mind.

1735: 1544:

Many thanks! (FYI: I added book dimensions, but the book doesn't seem to name the artist or explain the image, so in that regard I made no changes) Have a great week!

4039: 526: 283:

Do not speedy delete redirects things without first doing some basic research. A quick search off or on wiki would have provided you with the relevant information.--

165: 3879: 3833: 3788: 3731: 698: 486:, but there's no link to the ticket #, and the only ticket I was able to find in OTRS was closed as unsuccessful because it did not provide usable license ( 3929:. However, if the history is restored it could fix this problem. Assuming the history is fixed, should it also just be re-deleted under A7 or sent to AfD? 2909:-but I must be doing something wrong, I believe this is accepted as public domain. I hope to be a more active contributor soon, please forgive my lapses. 989: 2235: 237:

write a completely different article. Oh well, it's no big deal. I think the result will be the same in any event. Thanks for your response. Regards

4098:

Hello, Graeme Bartlett, I wanted to know why you deleted the talk page for this file and had such an edit summary when the file itself is clearly there.

3500:

I have declined the speedy delete as the article is about a software item, which is not a candidate for speedy delete A7. A prod could be used instead.

66:. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than 3766: 487: 1192: 4379: 2178:

F:Adam Zelle, geboren 2 oktober 1840 L FF:Cornelius Zelle, geboren 21 januari 1812 L FFF:Adam Selle FFFF: Herman Otto Zelle ~1743 d apr 1806

843:. Do you really think he took that picture himself? He has uploaded at least two images from other websites that he claimed were his own. Thanks. -- 1036: 129:

If I deleted your article, it may be possible for me to restore it. Please post a message for reconsideration of the deletion. and you can read

2530:

This has appeared in the Enigma newsletter, (and Enigma control list 22) and the numbers and oddities newsletter. Also Popular Communications).

890: 1200: 130: 4401:

guidelines which is why I tagged it for an admin to look at), it needs the history from the deleted version restored to preserve attribution.

3231:

Hi Graham, it's me again ;) Would you mind hide (I think that now en:admin have also access to the light oversight) 2 versions of the article

4109: 983: 396: 123: 2906: 2161: 2066: 1083: 1070: 181: 120: 117: 114: 111: 108: 105: 102: 99: 96: 2018: 1281: 3828: 3783: 3752: 2743: 2735: 435:

Thanks for the work you have been doing on this template. I noticed that you added a find sources to the template, but that violates

3232: 1372:. As stated in the discussion page, ottoman is more logical since the republic of Turkey was established only in 1923. Best regards-- 661: 385:). They have an EP already released (Empire, Fearless Records) and a full-length CD coming July 21 (Deceiver, Fearless Records - see 3875: 3528: 3487: 1176: 3166:. Would you not consider that it is worthy of a reinstatement? Here is the conversation I'm having with the editor who deleted it: 46: 2943:

I had assumed that the work of the organisation would be in the public domain until I saw that the main page for the INL website (

3143: 3112: 2925: 2561:

No problems, putting a copy there, I was not going to add a reference to the article until there was a more specific reference.

2550: 2505: 1030: 936: 218:

on it for some reason. His personal web site confirms the facts, so vandalism delete is hard to justify. Was there a AFD before?

1196: 3687: 3054:

Iggle Pop Logo and other games' logo uploaded by me (Big Money, Bookworm Adventures, Venice,...) will be tagged for deletion.

2688: 2652: 2617: 1949: 876: 872: 864: 52:

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than

257:

I think there were enough claims to avoid a speedy delete, but that refs do not support notability, but it was not vandalism.

4347: 3854: 3660:

witnessed of internet podcasts over the years, a significant (or to the very least an interesting) entry within the scope of

3633: 2996: 2598: 2667:, there is not hiding of identity here. The COI is not a reason to delete, but a reason to pay attention to promotion etc. 63: 4092: 3760: 2986:

Numbers Station: Shortwave, Radioteletype, Secret Broadcast, Letter Beacon, Lincolnshire Poacher, Cherry Ripe, Yosemite Sam

150:

around the world. This situation is sad but I will respect your policies. EuroCsys will not post any "advertising" again.

3016: 2981: 2969: 3926: 679: 4375: 3871: 3710:

you consider it worth keeping (it's obviously still a stub), could you vote in the AfD? If so, thanks and best regards.

2179: 1007: 2109: 610: 2951: 2884: 2861: 2188:

each supported by either primary documents or online database references. This is actually original research though.

1698: 1549: 1534: 1329: 4278: 3615:

which it is still present and can be flagged for the exact same reasons. The podcast's concept, much in the same way

2947: 2438:

Someone changed the criteria without consensus, but changed back. My instructions say file page for page on commons.

1369: 1365: 490:). Since you're not actively editing at the moment, I've blanked the article, just until the ticket # is produced. -- 4104: 2316: 2311: 995: 479: 3579:

Please let me know if you ever have any suggestions for me as an editor, or comments based on my admin actions.

412: 4316: 4285: 3546: 3505: 3442: 3386: 3311: 3274: 3040: 2836: 2672: 2632: 2566: 2535: 2443: 2372: 2320: 2210: 2193: 1937: 1854: 1807: 1794: 1776: 1762: 1721: 1506: 1188: 1097: 898: 776: 762: 420: 339: 303: 262: 223: 17: 3601: 573:

edit wikipedia a lot so I might not be familiar with all the details about it but thank you for helping me out!

3756: 3437:

They prove it exists, (step 1) there are lots more refs, so if you can identify the good ones please add them.

3012: 2944: 2717: 2261: 1568:

article. I have also gotten somebody to adopt me and help me out. Thanks for sending me in the right direction

1079:

Although the IP 80.564.583.0 geolocates to Italy, if I did it right, so I might be barking up the wrong sock. ←

1054: 977: 444: 1831: 400: 4371: 3238: 1257: 4122: 2303: 2165: 2062: 1679: 4367: 4335: 3867: 3842: 3675: 3210: 3131: 3100: 2913: 2054: 1581: 924: 687: 392: 381:

reinstated. One of their songs made enough of a splash to be selected for inclusion in the game Rock Band (

369: 4406: 4051: 4043: 4004: 3986: 3979: 3969: 3951: 3944: 3934: 3824: 3805: 3779: 3746: 3715: 3217: 3177: 2880: 2857: 2387: 2364: 2353: 1545: 1530: 1042: 1269: 4259: 4238: 4211: 4169: 4099: 4073: 4066: 4024: 3648: 3524: 3483: 3400: 3371: 2989: 2973: 2150: 2058: 1333: 1141: 1126: 439:

point 9. I'd like to get your thoughts on this, and possibly open this up to more feedback somewhere. —

3616: 2023:

Knowledge (XXG):VPR#Proposal to turn on revision deletion immediately (despite some lingering concerns)

1971: 1675: 1408: 869:

Knowledge (XXG):Templates for discussion/Log/2010 April 6#Template:Provinces and Districts of Sri Lanka

722:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 3337:

Just trying to protect Knowledge (XXG) from dubious or unambiguous additions of copyrighted material.

4312: 4137: 3896: 3623: 3542: 3501: 3438: 3382: 3307: 3270: 3139: 3108: 3036: 2921: 2832: 2803: 2668: 2628: 2582: 2562: 2546: 2531: 2501: 2464: 2439: 2428: 2368: 2206: 2189: 2090: 2083: 2043: 2001: 1930: 1886: 1850: 1803: 1787: 1772: 1755: 1717: 1502: 1093: 1024: 961: 932: 928: 894: 772: 758: 727: 578: 464: 416: 335: 321: 317: 299: 288: 284: 258: 245: 219: 201: 177: 3170: 2907:

http://www.facebook.com/profile/pic.php?uid=AAAAAQAQmSVhd1zTob5rj7PkDBTxjgAAAAnDF3A0YC_57GjAisPzNsKb

1785:

Only? That "only" acted to improve the encyclopedia. Keep up the good lookin' out. And thanks. --

1303: 1282:

http://www.hottopic.com/hottopic/WhatsNew/Music/We-Are-The-In-Crowd-Spooky-SlimFit-TShirt-163531.jsp

821: 4339: 4189: 3905: 3683: 2959: 2778: 2755: 2713: 2489: 2257: 1827: 1323: 1307: 972: 825: 651: 613:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 502: 491: 440: 3701: 2602: 532:

This hopefully avoids the problems of the various discussions split over several user talk pages.

4343: 4300: 3850: 3293: 2819: 2770: 2747: 2739: 2728: 2592: 2418:

CSD F2 if you read it, says nothing about Commons images, there is also a WP:AN thread on that.

2117: 1771:

Actually only declined a speedy delete, to give the article more or a chance to be reconsidered.

1664: 1655: 1635: 1605: 1598: 1574: 1463: 1451: 1430: 1080: 1067: 798: 363: 331: 313: 187: 4398: 536: 3817: 3772: 3742: 889:

Although that was stated by some voters, the closing comment asked for this to be discussed at

4410: 4402: 4391: 4383: 4351: 4320: 4304: 4267: 4246: 4219: 4191: 4177: 4142: 4116: 4080: 4055: 4047: 4028: 4008: 4000: 3973: 3965: 3938: 3930: 3911: 3883: 3719: 3711: 3590: 3550: 3535: 3509: 3494: 3460: 3446: 3431: 3404: 3390: 3375: 3347: 3315: 3300: 3278: 3264: 3260: 3249: 3245: 3221: 3213: 3195: 3181: 3173: 3147: 3116: 3085: 3080: 3068: 3063: 3044: 3020: 2993: 2963: 2929: 2888: 2865: 2840: 2825: 2796: 2782: 2759: 2721: 2692: 2676: 2656: 2636: 2621: 2570: 2556: 2539: 2519: 2511: 2468: 2447: 2432: 2408: 2403: 2391: 2383: 2376: 2357: 2349: 2284: 2265: 2214: 2197: 2169: 2154: 2121: 2070: 2037: 2007: 1858: 1843: 1811: 1797: 1780: 1765: 1725: 1711: 1709: 1683: 1657: 1637: 1612: 1585: 1553: 1538: 1510: 1494: 1490: 1467: 1434: 1396: 1392: 1381: 1377: 1354: 1348: 1311: 1145: 1130: 1101: 1087: 1074: 965: 940: 911: 902: 883: 849: 829: 806: 780: 766: 751: 731: 655: 629: 582: 559: 505: 494: 468: 448: 424: 404: 373: 343: 325: 307: 292: 266: 252: 227: 208: 140: 77: 3738:, but my knowledge of how to get around this has made it a slightly less effective solution. 3363: 3359: 1407:

The reason the article was re-created was because it was wrongfully deleted. The article met

1208:

There is a lot more coverage, but hopefully the above will be enough to help you reconsider.

953: 436: 30: 4252: 4231: 4204: 4162: 4020: 3661: 3653: 3521: 3480: 3456: 3427: 3396: 3367: 3191: 2280: 2146: 1964: 1623:

I have responded to your note on my own page. I am very interested in the New Page Patrol.

1565: 1137: 1122: 802: 794: 708:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

625: 3794: 3419: 2607: 2022: 719: 709: 702: 691: 588: 4129: 3338: 3135: 3104: 2937: 2917: 2515:

Should you wish to reply, please do so here. I will watch this page for a few days, so no

2460: 2424: 2203: 1996: 1643:

That's fine. I just was a little upset this morning and was being fairly rude. Apologies

1332:

and either move it onto the mainspace or unprotect the article so I can do it? Thank you.

1019: 957: 844: 723: 606: 592: 574: 460: 238: 194: 173: 386: 1524: 1167: 4363:

I have created the article and put proper sources to it. Why you deleted my article ?

4184: 3679: 3628: 3203: 3160: 3004: 2955: 2774: 2751: 2682: 2646: 2611: 2033: 2026: 1838: 1742: 1564:

I have done what you suggested and have either tagged stubs or other problems from the

647: 552: 382: 3611:

The initial MYMHM entry possessed as much relevant information than say the entry for

3576:

I can honestly say that your comments and your trust in me are greatly appreciated.

1876: 1841: 1716:

Worked! Thanks. I followed PhilKnight's protection example, even though unnecessary.

678:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

4296: 4183:

If look at the users contributions, it was legitimate as they were all unsourced. –

3918: 3846: 3643: 2815: 2809: 2588: 2137: 2113: 1671: 1644: 1624: 1569: 1459: 1447: 1426: 1233: 712:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

360: 277: 2627:

The editor clearly outed themselves, and has never complained about using the name.

521:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/2009 Singapore Romanian diplomat incident

3256: 3241: 3076: 3059: 1702: 1486: 1388: 1373: 1245: 744: 2337: 1293: 1180: 2984:

page, you've referenced a Betascript Publishing book: Lambert M. Surhone (2009).

4251:

Ahhh I see now, Thankyou Soo much for your assistance Graeme I appreciate it :D

3583: 3452: 3423: 3187: 2496:

me know the works to which you were referring, perhaps I would change my views.

2307: 2276: 1955: 1911: 1899: 1670:

On the page File talk:Wiki.png has started a discussion and voting for the file

908: 880: 621: 215: 2876: 2853: 1835: 671: 599: 527:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for creation/2009 Singapore Romanian diplomat incident

4277:

Howdy. It probably isn't a big deal, but when you deleted an old revision of

4155:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Nochex&diff=prev&oldid=370096125

3665: 3164: 3001:

User:PrimeHunter/Alphascript Publishing sells free articles as expensive books

2999:. Do you know what kinds of books are produced by this publishing house? See: 2710: 2348:, This page has been protected for a year now, so let's give it another try. 3612: 2133: 683: 665: 545: 214:

Yeah, the other deleted article was very very similar, but had a picture of

3899:

is a valid topic despite the fact that the author blatantly copied it from

1692: 1674:

to be returned to older version. Please get involve in discussion. Thanks,

298:

I did there was nothing reliable, just a question on facebook, and a blog.

1258:

http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/never-be-what-you-want-single/id342846838

3172:. Could you please comment/vote on the deltion review? Thanks very much. 3127:

yes please - can you email it to me? And can other members edit it too?

2421:

G6 was being used until F2 /F8 'explicitly' has the appropriate wording.

2141: 2127: 1172: 3903:

and has hardly made an effort to accurately covering the topic? Thanks!

3573:

Graeme Bartlett - Thank for your participation and support in my RfA.

2954:- copies of similar content - should probably also be removed. Regards, 1753:

has addressed your original thoughts toward its potential. Thank you. --

3638: 3332:

Hey, I noticed you declined the G12. I don't care much either way but

3169:. And here is the deletion review -- my request that it be reinstated: 3167: 2228: 2185:

L=Leeuwarden F=Franeker Frisian to at least 3 generations all around.

1270:

http://www.glamourkills.com/design/1569/WeAreTheInCrowdPreOrderPackage

1221: 1163: 3671:

Thank you for your time, Chauncey McAskill 20:19, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

2299: 1425:

2 Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network.

1092:

Thanks carrot eater, I will need to be more certain before blocking!

741:

Please remove backlinks and inclusions when deleting a page, thanks.

3514:

Pardon what may be technical ignorance, but are iPhone applications

3381:

Deleted, though I am working my way backwards through the alphabet!

2481:

I was unable to confirm the assumption behind the edit summary for

1750: 620:

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

535:

The page title was changed following discussions and concerns over

314:

Talk:Marina_Orlova#Marina_Rodina_Real_or_model_name.2Falias_sources

3565: 3564: 3477:

action in slightly greater detail than you already have? Thanks!

2831:

Thanks for that Martin, you got plenty of quote in that article!

2709:

Sorry about the mistaken CSD, I need to learn more about images.

1994:

Congrats on your Knowledge (XXG) day, that is quite impressive.--

1338: 839:

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. How are you doing? I'm not exactly sure

4046:

which you are, of course, very welcome to read if you wish to.

3605: 3900: 3290:

multiple times. Same source material is copied word for word.

2544:

Thanks for the reply. Moved to talk page if you don't object.

1802:

It looks far better now, I think the article is here to stay.

25: 3209:

You saved it from SD; now it's gone to AfD. Care to comment?

2017:

You are receiving this note because of your participation in

4087: