User talk:GreatLeader1945 - Knowledge (XXG)

1730:

some explanation, and if you thought that explanation wasn't adequate it would have been more helpful to explain why. GreatLeader, it is not true that a citation to an external source is needed only when there is no Knowledge (XXG) article is available to link to. There are sever reasons why Knowledge (XXG) policy does not accept a link to a Knowledge (XXG) article as a source; here are two of them. Firstly, a Knowledge (XXG) article is not a reliable source. Ideally, as you say, a Knowledge (XXG) article should consist entirely of "proven facts", but unfortunately that is not always the case: there are many places where articles contain inaccurate, doubtful, or misleading information, whether because of good-faith mistakes by editors or because of deliberate misrepresentation. Many editors spend a large amount of time correcting such inaccuracies in articles, but the mere fact that a Knowledge (XXG) article says something is not by any means reliable proof. Secondly, suppose that, as a citation for a statement in article A, I post a blue link to article B, which contains an external citation for that fact, but some months later someone editing article B removes the information from there. Then suppose that a year after that someone reading article A wishes to verify the fact in question. How much searching through the editing history are they expected to do? Anyway, Knowledge (XXG) policy is that a link to another Knowledge (XXG) article is not acceptable as a citation. Such links are intended as a convenient way for readers to find further information relevant to the subject of the article they are reading, not as a way of enabling verification of content of that article.

628:

edit-warring again I am likely to block you from editing, no matter how short or long a time has elapsed since the last relevant edit. And just in case you may be inclined to think that doing so after some time would not be preventive, let me explain that indeed it would. Far too often over the years have I seen editors who think that it's perfectly all right to keep repeatedly edit-warring, provided they stop each edit-war once they have been warned about it. I hope, of course, that you won't make that mistake, but just in case you may, I will tell you that my experience is that the only way of preventing an editor who makes that mistake from doing it again and again is for them to be blocked. It is neither necessary nor desirable for a new warning to be issued each time.

567:) and your conduct in that discussion, I'm warning you against the use of personal attacks. Do not describe the actions of other editors as "whitewashing", which can be construed as an unevidenced assertion about their motives. If you're saying that the effect of an edit was to create an NPOV problem, just say that. Do not comment on other editors' ethnicity or national origin without good reason, especially when doing so implies that they may be biased based on those characteristics. 1132:, and that is what should be followed. Nowhere in there does that policy suggest edit warring as a means to an end. Nowhere in that policy does it suggest that brute force is a way forward. If you find your 'success' as justification for future edit warring, you will be blocked, and possibly indefinitely. Your choice how you proceed. As to my tone, sorry you don't like it. I don't see any reason to change it, since you have been quite instransigent with regards to edit warring. -- 979: 2040: 2842: 1061:. If your go to "solution" to "fixing" an article is attempting to brute force your will onto articles, you will find yourself not part of this community. It does not matter how right you think you are. If you're not capable of discussing things, you will be gone from this community. You were previously concerned with how long a block would be for edit warring. You got off light here with the 24 hour block I placed on you. 2628: 1966: 1375: 23: 461: 1341:"Edit counts doesn't matter at all." It does. The sandbox advice implies that I'm a new user with a few edists that doesn't know how Knowledge (XXG) works, which is not the case. "The given summary was not at all adequate to justify why that section had to be removed". No, it was. It's a hilarious propaganda statement which has NO place in Knowledge (XXG). That you don't like this fact is not my problem. 1836: 2659:. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Knowledge (XXG)’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Knowledge (XXG) administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. 2463: 2363: 903: 369: 1454:. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in 2546: 2809: 2737: 1923: 1439: 1247: 1611:

adding an uncited fact constitute as vandalism, but I chose to go with an edit summary warning. Please provide citation or inline cite for every edit. Bluelinks are not equivalent to references, as Knowledge (XXG) itself is not a reliable source. Maybe it was a copy paste error from your part to remove that reference. If you are still not convinced, you may approach

665:. If things happen in the future, it is highly likely a block will happen without warning. It's a valid point that needs to be considered. I've seen editors who try to dodge around the policy by saying stuff like "that was years ago!" or "I wasn't blocked then, why am I blocked now after just two reverts?". There's no dancing around this. -- 1497:. That, sadly isn't self explanatory. Kindly provide citations for every additions in Knowledge (XXG) from reliable source, especially when it is a biography. Also, please be more specific in your edit summaries, and make sure you give a rationale for removing well cited sections from the article. Thanks and happy editing. 147:— here, the idea is to extract the axiological asymmetry argument into a dedicated page. This way, a more detailed presentation could be given. In addition, we could expand on the various responses others philosophers made and counters from Benatar. Other pages could have a brief description and link to the details page. 2508:

You yourself are to be blamed, as you behaved illogically, not giving an explanation when I politely asked you to "please elaborate". Also at the Battle of Bakhmut talk page. Being "an administrator" does give you the right to behave illogically and ignore things other users address to you. There are

2487:

We are well into disruption territory here. I will warn you this one last time--and since you don't seem to understand, I'll repeat what I said: WARNING an IP editor after they are already blocked is useless, and IP addresses do NOT get blocked indefinitely. I understand if you don't understand that,

1477:

Why did you remove the info about the Juche calendar when it's not in the Kim Il Sung page as far as I can see? And thus its place is right next to the mentioned "Day of the sun", his birthday, on which this year-numbering system is based. As for the edit summary, I very often writen one, you can see

494:

where is says "A customised signature should make it easy to identify your username." Your current signature has absolutely nothing to do with your username, and nobody would conclude your signature is that of "GreatLeader1945". If you want to change your username to "MagnusRegnumAntichristiAdvenit",

2438:

please read this - RfCs are time consuming, and editor time is valuable. Editors should try to resolve their issues before starting an RfC. Try discussing the matter with any other parties on the related talk page. If you can reach a consensus or have your questions answered through discussion, then

2414:

on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit

958:

420:

284:

today, continuing the edit war despite conversation still ongoing. You are WELL over the line here. If you conduct another such edit while discussion has yet to conclude about changing the image on the article, I will report you for edit warring and it is likely you will be blocked. Please, don't do

1791:

About the previous revert in India article, that issue must be discussed in the talk page for consensus before removing a paragraph from the lede with adequately explain why it is a propaganda of sort. For such an old FA with multiple peer review, that is the exact procedure to determine what is to

1192:

Time stamp 08:52, 23 October 2023 (UTC). Pretty simple really. You make it clear from your perspective that without edit warring/brute force, that situation would not have resolved favorably. Regardless, semantic discussions aren't going to resolve this. What will is your personal understanding and

1806:

I haven't looked into the India situation, but I would agree in principle that removal of a paragraph from the lead of an FA is the sort of obviously contentious move that would best be discussed first at talk. The Herald, it's great to see you take the feedback so well here. Happy editing to all.

1720:

Herald, it is true that in principle all Knowledge (XXG) article content should be cited, but GreatLeader1945 is of course right in saying that in practice that doesn't happen. Probably if one of us searched we could find a Knowledge (XXG) article somewhere which says that grass is green without a

1610:

or external, especially a fact that you stated. I really don't doubt your competence and I have been in the same place as you. But as a newbie, you have to understand that citations are necessary, especially if it's a biography. Sorry, if you feel I'm patronising, but removing a cited sentence and

1113:

This edit war brought the attention of many other users, some of which agreed with my position and backed it with additional objective sources etc.! You know, as in life, sometimes you have to "brute force" to deal with untruth ;) I will also suggest you to watch your tone, we're not at the police

2817:

in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving,

1729:

must have a citation to a reliable source. Also your original message, saying "you recently removed content from India without adequately explaining why", was not very helpful. That sort of message is perhaps adequate for an editor who has given no explanation at all, but GreatLeader1945 did give

1322:

Edit counts doesn't matter at all. When you are removing huge texts from a featured article, (one of the oldest and highly watched) you must discuss it in the talk page for consensus and then after obtaining consensus, you may proceed. The given summary was not at all adequate to justify why that

697:

Does it matter? The point is DO NOT EDIT WAR. Edit wars are pointless and disruptive to the project. How long a block is has no bearing on whether to conduct edit warring or not. Either give up edit warring as a means to an end, or you will be blocked. Your choice. If you try to make that choice

499:

for how to do it. In the meantime, please change your custom signature back to something that clearly identifies your current username. Please understand; I know where at disagreement at the Kim Jong Un article; this had nothing top do with that. I'm not here to harass you. I was confused by the

2771:

There's no term like "scientific" in transliteration, it is "phonetic" transliteration; it shows pronunciation which couldn't contain hyphens. I advise you to read the definition of transliteration: "Transliteration helps people speak a language by showing the pronunciation in the language they

1733:

OK, there are a few comments. I have not by any means covered every aspect of your discussion, but I hope some or all of what I have said may be helpful to one or both of you. However, the thing which strikes me most about the discussion between you is that both of you could try to conduct the

1419:

While their approach to dealing with disagreements with other editors is not ideal, they have made a considerable improvement in how they do so compared to how they started out, and I don't see any justification for getting rid of them now. There is a significant amount of constructive editing.

2509:

many cases of administrators being blocked for behaving unconstructively and abusing their block right. I DID NOT "vandalize Knowledge (XXG)". Again, absolutely illogical statements from your side. I'll have to address this to the respective authorities if you continue with this behavior.

627:

gave you a warning about edit-warring above. Had I seen your editing at the time I would have blocked you from editing; you had already been warned, and did not need another warning. I am not blocking you now, because it is quite a while since your last edit-warring edit, but if I see you

2280:

My mistake, tone reads a little sharp. I read the discussion after you linked it, I meant that you should have linked it more explicitly in the move request or similar. Everything else in my recent reply is with the understanding of the thread you linked. Am I misunderstanding anything?

1734:

discussion in a less combative spirit. That way both of you would be more likely to listen constructively to what the other one is saying, and therefore more likely to hear and understand the constructive points the other is making; both of you do have constructive points to make.

2373:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the 917:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the 379:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the 122:

directly to ask for some help. I've started 3 initiatives for these pages. If you could spare some time in the near future, could you please take a look at the proposal and voice your opinion? Of course, if you have interest, time, and energy to participate that would be amazing!

1357:

Editors with over a million edits still use sandboxes on a daily basis for testing out wiki syntax and for test edits. Nothing wrong in that. If you feel it was a propaganda, kindly discuss it in the talk page. It will be removed otherwise. Thank you.

777:

GreatLeader1945; ...and yet you continue with personal attacks that we don't "seem to be able to read". That's quite enough. I don't have to answer how long the block will be. Different administrators will apply different blocks. Discussion about the

1716:

I don't think either of you is completely wrong, but neither of you is completely right either. There is quite an extended disagreement between you, and I'm not going to try to comment on every point that has come up: I will restrict myself to a few

2812:

Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Knowledge (XXG) has some

1755:

I take very seriously the definition of vandalism and the sanctity of the word "unexplained" in "unexplained removal", and I'd encourage everyone to move forward with a commitment to respect good-faith contributions and contributors.

1492:

As the edit summary in my revert said, the addition was uncited and the section you removed had references from a reliable source. You removed an already well cited section and added an uncited sentence with an edit summary that said

1780:

Thank you both for the inputs. I might have come out harsh with the warnings and usage of the term vandalism/unexplained removal. I did try to explain the changes and reverts, but I couldn't provided some more links to policies like

1056:

regarding your edit warring. You still don't seem to have taken the seriousness of edit warring to heart. If you want to be part of this community, you're going to have to learn to work with it. Discussing issues with an article is

500:"MagnusRegnumAntichristiAdvenit" signature as I hadn't seen that username in the conversation before and the alerts notification system told me that "GreatLeader1945" had pinged me, not ""MagnusRegnumAntichristiAdvenit". Thanks, -- 444:

You're the one that started the edit war and you're arguing with facts stated in the page itself! You're abusing your top-tier-user position and literally try to white-wash an authoritarian regime of whom you're a fan of.

744:

I'm asking informatively is it a perma (as a perma one is used for sock-puppetry, for example) or not, because I'm not acquaintanced with the character of the edit war block and you have to answer this question of mine.

2240:

I haven't seen the discussion before, something that you should have linked. I'm confused by your reasoning. That discussion is not policy yet, and I don't think you're interpreting it correctly. If it went into force,

2248:

You're implying here that proof was given for Ri, but she's a separate person from the three Kims. No common name for her has been rigorously established yet, so unilaterally removing the hyphen still wouldn't make

1881: 2146:

in October last year because of assumed standardized romanization of DPRK names. I'm skeptical of the reasoning you gave, although it's possible that that's really the romanization we should use (because it's her

1323:

section had to be removed. The article and the lede had undergone multiple peer views from the community. Hence, consensus is a must. Kindly proceed to talk page and discuss it there. Thanks and happy editing :)

140:— related to the one above. The historical account is overly detailed. It would be much better to have a dedicated page for the history of philosophical pessimism and leave only a brief history in the main page. 601:, I won't further participate in the edit war (because of it's pointlessness - there's a user who's literally arguing with facts stated in the said Knowledge (XXG) pages, and not because I'm afraid of a block). 728:, I won't further participate in the edit war (because of it's pointlessness - there's a user who's literally arguing with facts stated in the said Knowledge (XXG) pages, and not because I'm afraid of a block). 2226:- that doesn't count here, as as per the requested move discussion I linked, the said names were written half the times with a hyphen and half the times without one. Again, see the discussion I've linked. 342:

I did read it, but it did not appear to address the overall abstract issue. Further, I wanted to record the reverts you have been doing in case another administrator wishes to address this issue. Thanks,

1865:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 661:

I concur with JBW. GreatLeader1945, JBW brings a valid point forward here. Given how much has happened, more warnings are not needed. There is no reason you should not have a strong understanding of

1053: 1850: 2071:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. 1606:

Kindly read my previous message to understand what I am trying to say. The calander fact you mentioned was already cited, but your edit removed it. You have to provide citations, be it

2252:

If you want to make a unilateral change to NK name style, propose it. But if your version of the proposal includes overriding common name in all scenarios, I'm skeptical that'll pass.

2749: 2690:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics

1215:

As I said, I will not participate anymore in edit wars, and if I do, block me permanently. If there is something that I don't agree with, I will create a talk page topic. Cheers.

1752:

is pretty clear that editors adding unsourced material should add citation when it's challenged. Tagging is better than removal if most editors agree the material is likely true.

2699: 465: 2772:

understand." The other pages in wikipedia cannot be given as an evidence that yours is correct because all these transliterations with hyphens are unfortunately incorrect,

26:

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on

2173:. That is established policy, and nowhere is it written in there that NK names are not hyphenated by default. If you'd like to add that policy, propose it on that page. 716:"Either give up edit warring as a means to an end, or you will be blocked." - All of you guys that came to my talk page the last two days don't seem to be able to read - 1308:

should explain what you don't agree with. As for the sandbox part – it's funny as you didn't even saw that I'm an extended autoconfirmed user with over 600 edits xD.

200:, but if not then you should read it, because you are in danger of being blocked from editing for violation of that policy if you continue editing as you have done. 133:— this initiative is already in progress. The idea is to raise the quality of the page by switching it from a mere historical account to a more encyclopedic format. 260:

discussion about a possible replacement photo was recently initiated at the talk page of the article. You have used three different photos that you seem to like:

88:

I am finding it too difficult to make sense out of your reverts here. Are you okay if photo of Gandhi and Sukarno have been used instead of Mazibur and Gandhi?

2188:

Furthermore, you did that as an undiscussed move. I feel like it at least should have been discussed. Have you moved any other pages under this reasoning?

1304:

without adequately explaining why" – I "adequately" and explicitly explained why, what are you even talking about? - It's written in the the edit summary.

1383: 1073:

clearly demonstrating you are not capable of working with this community. Either you change your ways, or you will be gone. I hope I've been clear. If

171:

I reverted your move and changes. This has been moved previously. The talk page has some informaiton on why this title is appropriate. Please create a

1816: 1765: 768: 583: 2596: 2442:

Let's try and sort this out on the talkpage please - you should not be requesting RFCs before you're made any real attempt at resolving the issue.

2206:

Don't know what are you talking about but generally the 'evidence' I give is that the pages "Kim Il-sung", "Kim Jong-il" and "Kim Jong-un" became "

1262:

without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Knowledge (XXG) with an accurate

2553:. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to 2745: 2295:

If no reply within a week, I may request that the article be renamed back to the original btw. I'll make a post on her article talk page later

1560: 1022: 2752:, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you very much! 1406: 1170:

openly declaring your intention to continue to edit contrary to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies, and also to the whole ethos of Knowledge (XXG)" -

1148:

openly declaring your intention to continue to edit contrary to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies, and also to the whole ethos of Knowledge (XXG).

2607: 2587:

to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an

1904: 647:, why haven't you read the above comments on my talk page before writing this wall of text about something that has already been settled? 35: 873:

confirmed my position in KZ's talk page discussion. You're arguing with the article. We can continue this pointless talking for eternity.

31: 265: 1646: 1405:

GreatLeader1945 clearly has no respect for the WP ethos. Reading thru the talk page it's clear the time has come to issue a permaban.

1197:. If you don't, and you return to edit warring after this block expires, I think it highly likely the next block will be indefinite. -- 782:

of the block is meaningless. If you don't engage in edit warring again, you don't have to worry about it. You should consider applying

2740:

Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors

2443: 2420: 2850: 2846: 2374: 1974: 1970: 1003: 918: 380: 43: 2222:

for more info about why a hyphen should not be used in romanizations of names of people from the DPRK/related to the DPRK. As for

1900: 2592: 2558: 2390: 1874: 1129: 1058: 1011: 934: 396: 2162:

as evidence for some reason, but that's not a supporting piece of evidence, as Park's name was romanized that way because of

2155: 1943: 2741: 2394: 1721:

citation, and I doubt that anyone would object to that. (Well, not anyone other than a troll.) However, it is true that any

1015: 938: 496: 400: 2245:

would still be the highest authority, and then we'd default to what significant style guides do, which is to not hyphenate.

2166:

and he's South Korean. Really, all romanizations for Korean people's names are first and foremost governed by common name.

1146:

GreatLeader1945, when I read your latest message above, I seriously considered blocking you indefinitely, because you were

1052:

six times on your talk page here before this sub thread on your edit warring on Tunisia. You also were taken to WP:AN/I at

1812: 1761: 1443: 764: 579: 1982: 1935: 1607: 1379: 1266:. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use 570:

I'm eager to see this content dispute settled at the talk page. Please, as you discuss with your fellow volunteers, keep

27: 2056: 165: 137: 130: 2858: 2602: 2480: 2402: 1297: 1255: 987: 946: 408: 2092: 1886: 293:

If any of it is unclear to you, ask questions. Don't continue edit warring. It will not go well for you. Thank you, --

144: 2814: 1939: 39: 2219: 490:

Your currently chosen signature username of "MagnusRegnumAntichristiAdvenit" does not comply with our guideline at

1267: 114:

Hello there! I see you've been quite active in some things related to the above mentioned pages. I'm pinging you

261: 2588: 2550: 2407: 2386: 2370: 1712:

Because of lack of time I have not prof read this message, so please forgive any typoes or other silly mistakes.

996: 992: 951: 930: 914: 662: 413: 392: 376: 288: 273: 1808: 1757: 1681: 1410: 760: 721: 594: 575: 2611: 1862: 1065:. Some administrators would have indefinitely blocked you because you are showing a blatant disregard for our 491: 2475: 2122:

Thank you very much! I wish to you and your loved ones a Merry Christmas and all the best in the new year!

269: 104: 2242: 2223: 2163: 2148: 1583: 1168:"when I read your latest message above, I seriously considered blocking you indefinitely, because you were 2706: 2348: 2324: 2300: 2286: 2257: 2193: 2178: 2695: 2562: 2554: 2471: 2378: 1007: 922: 384: 69:

has to say on the subject. Religions, usually, have an ideology although it's usually called a doctrine.

2721: 2447: 2424: 2015:

Bruhhh. It ain't matter. No one pronounces it that way and that's audible in the respective audio file.

155: 2320: 2296: 2282: 2253: 2203: 2189: 2174: 2170: 2060: 1612: 277: 2510: 2267: 2227: 2123: 2108: 2080: 2016: 1797: 1685: 1620: 1591: 1502: 1479: 1463: 1395: 1363: 1342: 1328: 1309: 1279: 1271: 1216: 1202: 1179: 1137: 1115: 1082: 1038: 874: 838: 791: 746: 730: 703: 684: 670: 648: 602: 538: 520: 505: 446: 348: 329: 298: 256:. You have been reverted by three different editors, myself included. Four of these changes happened 223: 117: 93: 2823: 1844: 815:

I tried twice page protection and once anti vandalism request, however there was nothing in return.

2831: 2565:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. 2315:

You moved it back again without discussion, despite known challenge to the move. That goes against

1455: 51: 2382: 2319:; please make sure you understand that policy before doing something similar again in the future. 1858: 1782: 1749: 1109:, there'd only be a discussion between me and him at the talk page and he'd say that he's "right" 926: 388: 1955: 1947: 1789:. I wasn't trying to sound combative. But I will try to put forward a clearer message next time. 1548: 1382:

information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Knowledge (XXG) about

856: 820: 473: 430: 179: 2640: 571: 1706:

OK, since you have alerted me to this, GreatLeader1945, I will say a few things. Also alerting

1101:. But I'm glad that, in the end, I won in the Kazakhstan infobox debate with this user and his 2866: 2787:

If you're so interested in wp:rules I think you also know 3 revert rule and its consequences.

2757: 2344: 1978: 1665:. Else, said articles wouldn't exist and would get deleted. One ABSOLUTELY can use blue links 1643:

Bluelinks are not equivalent to references, as Knowledge (XXG) itself is not a reliable source

1526:

is based on his birth year, as it's explicitly stated in the ARTICLE about the calendar: "The

1447: 1263: 968: 74: 2316: 1870: 1786: 1650: 1587: 1270:. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 2792: 2777: 2717: 2527: 2494: 1988: 1893: 837:- that's because you are literally arguing with the article itself. You're wrong, not I xD 325: 220: 151: 2340: 1873:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1866: 783: 725: 598: 560: 196:

you wrote "stop with your edit war". That suggests that you are aware of Knowledge (XXG)'s

145:

Talk:Antinatalism#A proposal to create a dedicated page for Benatar's axiological asymmetry

2584: 2119: 2104: 2076: 2039: 2001: 1793: 1707: 1677: 1630: 1616: 1512: 1498: 1474: 1459: 1391: 1359: 1338: 1324: 1291: 1275: 1251: 1212: 1198: 1133: 1092: 1078: 1034: 978: 787: 713: 699: 680: 666: 534: 516: 501: 344: 309: 294: 89: 1194: 1066: 1049: 1021:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Knowledge (XXG)'s

197: 172: 1150:

I strongly urge you to take every word of what Hammersoft has said to heart. Seriously.

2827: 2411: 2381:

among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about

2159: 1520: 955: 925:

among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about

851:

You're bringing up stuff. And that terminology is not even appropriate on the infobox.

417: 387:

among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about

47: 2841: 2627: 2385:. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant 929:. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant 391:. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant 66: 2854: 2055:

Hello GreatLeader1945, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this

1951: 1927: 1739: 1425: 1155: 866: 852: 834: 830: 816: 633: 624: 469: 441: 426: 285:

this. More abstractly, given that you've been edit warring elsewhere on the project,

205: 176: 1582:

exist yet, and so one needs to point to EXTERNAL sources. I think there's a serious

2862: 2753: 2702:. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the 2488:

but edit warring with an administrator over something like this is not a good idea.

1938:. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to 1069:

and a very strong willingness to brute force your way around this project. You are

964: 870: 108: 70: 1965: 1835: 1374: 138:

Talk:Philosophical_pessimism#A proposal to split the History into a dedicated page

22: 2419:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 963:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 698:

based on your guess of how long the block will be, you will be...disappointed. --

425:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 2788: 2773: 2655:

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as

2523: 2505: 2490: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2143: 1544: 1540: 238: 193: 2870: 2835: 2796: 2781: 2761: 2725: 2615: 2531: 2517: 2498: 2462: 2451: 2428: 2362: 2352: 2328: 2304: 2290: 2275: 2261: 2235: 2197: 2182: 2131: 2112: 2084: 2024: 2005: 1959: 1908: 1820: 1801: 1769: 1743: 1693: 1624: 1599: 1506: 1487: 1467: 1429: 1414: 1399: 1367: 1350: 1332: 1317: 1283: 1224: 1206: 1187: 1159: 1141: 1123: 1086: 1042: 972: 902: 882: 860: 846: 824: 795: 772: 754: 738: 707: 692: 674: 656: 637: 610: 587: 546: 528: 509: 477: 454: 434: 368: 352: 337: 302: 231: 209: 182: 159: 97: 78: 55: 2012: 1993: 362: 2064: 1387: 2683:

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

726:

WP:ANI#Edit warring on Kazakhstan and personal attacks User:GreatLeader1945

599:

WP:ANI#Edit warring on Kazakhstan and personal attacks User:GreatLeader1945

561:

WP:ANI#Edit warring on Kazakhstan and personal attacks User:GreatLeader1945

2266:

Watch your tone and probably see the discussion before commenting maybe?

2068: 1931: 1735: 1673: 1421: 1165: 1151: 810: 644: 629: 317: 313: 216: 201: 38:. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting 2808: 2744:

while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at

2736: 2573:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;

2369:

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an

1922: 1877:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1246: 375:

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an

2158:, doesn't mention anything about hyphenization in names. You also gave 1854:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

910: 896: 131:

Talk:Philosophical_pessimism#A proposal for an overhaul of the article

468:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

237:(For the record) GreatLeader1945, you have changed the photo used on 1725:

statement should have a citation, and it is a very firm policy that

219:

I agreed to not changed the photo if consensus is not reached, see

2826:

to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

1559:

calendar. The calendar was adopted in 1997, three years after the

1535: 1301: 1259: 2819: 1987:

The short vowel /e/ or the diphthong /ej/ do not exist in formal

65:

I am not going to revert you, but you may want to check out what

1890:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 42:

and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the

2410:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 1946:. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on 1880:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

1848:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

1684:. Tagging you because there is a serious problem arising here. 1025:, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: 954:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 416:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 2583:

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's

1930:. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2511: 2361: 1563:." Not sure if you even realize what you said. In this case 977: 901: 759:

GL1945, you pinged me. Is there something you need from me?

367: 1977:

of published material to articles as you apparently did to

2845:

Please stop. If you continue to violate Knowledge (XXG)'s

1547:, the founder of North Korea. His birth year, 1912 in the 1010:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek 322:

agreed to not change the photo if consensus is not reached

2644:. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and 1576:

used when a Knowledge (XXG) article about this said fact

280:

in the Kim Jong Un article, I would have blocked you for

1653:

problem on your part. Bluelinks point to articles about

1105:

and untrue claims because the factology was on my side!

1861:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

564: 281: 254: 252: 250: 248: 246: 244: 242: 150:

I hope at least some of this will spark your interest!

2401:

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being

2220:

Talk:Kim Jong Un/Archive 9#Requested move 6 April 2023

1659:, events, people etc. PRO-VEN. And they are backed by 1178:" in bold and italic. What message were you reading?! 945:

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being

407:

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being

175:

discussion if you'd like to continue with the move. -

2142:

I saw that you requested a move of Ko Yong-hui -: -->

1942:

and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at

1635:

Please provide citation or inline cite for every edit

1014:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 466:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

1792:

be added in the lede and what shouldn't be. Thanks.

519:

OK, I'll revert it to my original one (my username)

2698:or you may learn more about this contentious topic 2677:

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

2393:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 1128:There is no 'winning' in Knowledge (XXG). There is 937:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 399:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 272:. This is unquestionably a direct violation of our 2578:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. 1539:ideology, is the system of year-numbering used in 995:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 109:Antinatalism#Asymmetry between good and bad things 2670:, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and: 2650:imply that there are any issues with your editing 2417:even if you do not violate the three-revert rule 2377:to work toward making a version that represents 961:even if you do not violate the three-revert rule 921:to work toward making a version that represents 423:even if you do not violate the three-revert rule 383:to work toward making a version that represents 2680:follow editorial and behavioural best practice; 2662:Within contentious topics, editors should edit 1727:any uncited statement which has been challenged 1172:False. I literally wrote at the very begining " 1059:one of the earliest steps of dispute resolution 241:seven times between October 5 and October 17: 1641:does that for EVERY edit and you know that. " 1077:of this is unclear, then by all means ask. -- 8: 2339:If you are reverted make a case at talk per 2634:You have recently edited a page related to 913:shows that you are currently engaged in an 2674:adhere to the purposes of Knowledge (XXG); 2595:. In some cases, it may be appropriate to 1748:I second JBW's points here. I'll add that 1662:external references in these said articles 1002:During a dispute, you should first try to 287:you need to carefully read and follow the 2549:You currently appear to be engaged in an 1027:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} 2746:Old Calendar Bulgarian Orthodox Church 2046:Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! 1669:and that's exactly what most users do. 2474:Knowledge (XXG) again, as you did at 1384:living (or recently deceased) persons 7: 2849:by adding your personal analysis or 2822:Knowledge (XXG). Take a look at the 2599:. If you engage in an edit war, you 1845:2023 Arbitration Committee elections 869:"You're bringing up stuff." False. @ 316:just above this comment of yours: "@ 1863:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 1829:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message 464:There is currently a discussion at 266:File:Kim Jong-un 2019 (cropped).jpg 36:not for use as a forum or chat room 2621:Introduction to contentious topics 2439:there is no need to start an RfC. 2218:" respectively some time ago. See 1615:or other reference desks. Thanks. 1378:Please do not add unreferenced or 1130:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution 14: 2597:request temporary page protection 497:Knowledge (XXG):Changing username 192:I see that in an edit summary at 46:for more information. Thank you. 2840: 2807: 2735: 2626: 2544: 2461: 2154:The page you gave for evidence, 2038: 1989:Modern Standard Arabic phonology 1964: 1921: 1834: 1452:always fill in the summary field 1437: 1373: 1245: 724:As I said in my reply to you at 597:As I said in my reply to you at 459: 21: 2696:arbitration clerks' noticeboard 2686:refrain from gaming the system. 2406:—especially if you violate the 1985:for all of your contributions. 1884:and submit your choices on the 1442:Hello. I have noticed that you 950:—especially if you violate the 909:Your recent editing history at 412:—especially if you violate the 312:, did you read what I said to @ 2767:Transliterations Ibn Saud page 2557:with others, to avoid editing 2343:, do not edit war it back in. 2156:Romanization of Korean (North) 1686:GreatLeader1945GreatLeader1945 1543:. It begins with the birth of 1478:this in my user edit history. 1254:. I noticed that you recently 555:Warning about personal attacks 521:MagnusRegnumAntichristiAdvenit 447:MagnusRegnumAntichristiAdvenit 224:MagnusRegnumAntichristiAdvenit 183:12:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC) 1: 2853:into articles, as you did at 2636:the Balkans or Eastern Europe 2452:21:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC) 2429:21:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC) 2353:19:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC) 2132:11:58, 26 December 2023 (UTC) 2113:06:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC) 2085:06:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC) 2025:19:36, 31 December 2023 (UTC) 2006:19:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC) 1960:17:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC) 1909:00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 1821:22:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC) 1802:20:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 1770:19:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 1744:11:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 1694:09:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 1625:09:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 1600:09:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 1507:09:16, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 1488:09:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 1468:08:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 1430:23:00, 20 November 2023 (UTC) 1415:10:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC) 1400:19:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC) 1368:17:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC) 1351:16:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC) 1333:16:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC) 1318:18:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC) 1296:"I noticed that you recently 1284:17:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC) 1107:If there wasn't this edit war 1004:discuss controversial changes 991:temporarily from editing for 833:For the millionth time, mr. @ 326:Talk:Kim Jong Un#New portrait 221:Talk:Kim Jong Un#New portrait 166:Protestant Church in Germany 160:14:04, 6 September 2023 (UTC) 2748:. Here is Knowledge (XXG)'s 2305:19:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC) 2291:10:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC) 2276:10:07, 2 February 2024 (UTC) 2262:10:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC) 2236:09:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC) 2198:09:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC) 2183:09:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC) 2169:You should be defaulting to 2095:}} to other user talk pages. 2091:Spread the love by adding {{ 1225:15:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC) 1207:14:52, 23 October 2023 (UTC) 1188:13:11, 23 October 2023 (UTC) 1160:12:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC) 1142:11:04, 23 October 2023 (UTC) 1124:08:52, 23 October 2023 (UTC) 1087:02:49, 23 October 2023 (UTC) 1043:18:38, 22 October 2023 (UTC) 973:10:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC) 883:15:29, 18 October 2023 (UTC) 861:15:26, 18 October 2023 (UTC) 847:15:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC) 825:15:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC) 796:17:54, 18 October 2023 (UTC) 773:16:37, 18 October 2023 (UTC) 755:16:31, 18 October 2023 (UTC) 739:17:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 708:16:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC) 693:15:17, 18 October 2023 (UTC) 675:15:12, 18 October 2023 (UTC) 657:14:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC) 638:13:27, 18 October 2023 (UTC) 611:17:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 588:17:06, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 547:16:18, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 529:16:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 510:15:45, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 478:15:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 455:14:37, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 435:13:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 353:18:51, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 338:18:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 303:18:41, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 232:08:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 210:08:31, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 2847:no original research policy 1934:, but you didn't provide a 574:at the front of your mind. 98:04:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 79:20:01, 14 August 2023 (UTC) 2886: 2762:18:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC) 2329:20:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC) 2138:NK romanization standards? 2063:by wishing another user a 1901:MediaWiki message delivery 1515:You're joking, right? You 683:Is the block a perma one? 559:Per evidence presented at 2871:12:02, 23 July 2024 (UTC) 2836:16:47, 10 July 2024 (UTC) 2726:16:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 2616:17:34, 9 March 2024 (UTC) 2532:16:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC) 2518:15:45, 7 March 2024 (UTC) 2499:14:22, 7 March 2024 (UTC) 2037: 1944:referencing for beginners 1450:. Please do your best to 1114:station here xD. Cheers. 1023:guide to appealing blocks 997:make useful contributions 262:File:Kim Jong-un 2019.png 56:09:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC) 2797:10:08, 30 May 2024 (UTC) 2782:06:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC) 2694:you may ask them at the 2638:, a topic designated as 2563:try to reach a consensus 2271: 2231: 2127: 2093:subst:Seasonal Greetings 2020: 1898:to your user talk page. 1689: 1595: 1483: 1346: 1313: 1220: 1183: 1119: 1048:You were pointed to the 878: 842: 750: 734: 688: 652: 606: 542: 524: 450: 333: 227: 2589:appropriate noticeboard 2476:User talk:31.218.86.208 1590:problem emerging here. 663:our edit warring policy 620:Persistent edit-warring 270:File:KimjongunPhoto.jpg 126:Here are the projects: 105:Philosophical pessimism 32:policies and guidelines 2483:without further notice 2366: 1519:need to cite that the 1446:edit without using an 982: 906: 372: 198:policy on edit-warring 2365: 1859:Arbitration Committee 1842:Hello! Voting in the 981: 905: 371: 2859:blocked from editing 2481:blocked from editing 2403:blocked from editing 2105:The Herald (Benison) 2077:The Herald (Benison) 2031:Seasonal greetings!! 1794:The Herald (Benison) 1617:The Herald (Benison) 1569:about a certain fact 1561:death of Kim Il Sung 1499:The Herald (Benison) 1460:The Herald (Benison) 1392:The Herald (Benison) 1360:The Herald (Benison) 1325:The Herald (Benison) 1276:The Herald (Benison) 1095:You got a point and 947:blocked from editing 409:blocked from editing 84:Father of the Nation 44:talk page guidelines 1809:Firefangledfeathers 1758:Firefangledfeathers 1682:Firefangledfeathers 1195:edit warring policy 1067:edit warring policy 1050:edit warring policy 761:Firefangledfeathers 722:Firefangledfeathers 595:Firefangledfeathers 576:Firefangledfeathers 289:edit warring policy 274:edit warring policy 2669: 2665: 2657:contentious topics 2649: 2593:dispute resolution 2391:dispute resolution 2367: 1969:Please do not add 1940:include a citation 1875:arbitration policy 1549:Gregorian calendar 1533:, named after the 1495:important addition 1012:dispute resolution 983: 935:dispute resolution 907: 397:dispute resolution 373: 40:our reference desk 2742:assume good faith 2667: 2663: 2647: 2408:three-revert rule 2102: 2101: 2057:seasonal occasion 1979:As-salamu alaykum 1971:original research 1911: 1380:poorly referenced 1193:adherence to our 1111:and that'd be it! 952:three-revert rule 414:three-revert rule 2877: 2844: 2811: 2739: 2711: 2705: 2630: 2568:Points to note: 2548: 2547: 2513: 2465: 2383:how this is done 2096: 2042: 2035: 2034: 1981:. Please cite a 1968: 1925: 1899: 1897: 1838: 1456:your preferences 1441: 1440: 1386:, as you did to 1377: 1295: 1249: 1028: 927:how this is done 895:Edit warring on 814: 463: 462: 389:how this is done 361:Edit warring on 121: 30:and the project 28:reliable sources 25: 2885: 2884: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2818:please use the 2805: 2769: 2733: 2715: 2714: 2709: 2703: 2631: 2623: 2545: 2542: 2512:GreatLeader1945 2459: 2436: 2395:page protection 2360: 2337: 2268:GreatLeader1945 2228:GreatLeader1945 2140: 2124:GreatLeader1945 2090: 2065:Merry Christmas 2033: 2017:GreatLeader1945 1983:reliable source 1975:novel syntheses 1936:reliable source 1919: 1914: 1913: 1891: 1839: 1831: 1592:GreatLeader1945 1480:GreatLeader1945 1438: 1407:129.222.253.198 1343:GreatLeader1945 1310:GreatLeader1945 1298:removed content 1289: 1256:removed content 1243: 1217:GreatLeader1945 1180:GreatLeader1945 1116:GreatLeader1945 1031: 1030: 1026: 1019: 1016:page protection 1000: 939:page protection 900: 875:GreatLeader1945 839:GreatLeader1945 808: 786:to yourself. -- 747:GreatLeader1945 731:GreatLeader1945 685:GreatLeader1945 649:GreatLeader1945 622: 603:GreatLeader1945 557: 539:GreatLeader1945 488: 460: 401:page protection 366: 330:GreatLeader1945 190: 169: 118:GreatLeader1945 115: 112: 86: 67:merriam webster 63: 61:Ideology/nazism 19: 12: 11: 5: 2883: 2881: 2804: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2768: 2765: 2732: 2729: 2688: 2687: 2684: 2681: 2678: 2675: 2668:constructively 2651: 2632: 2625: 2624: 2622: 2619: 2608:37.245.222.139 2581: 2580: 2575: 2541: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2458: 2455: 2435: 2432: 2359: 2356: 2336: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2293: 2250: 2246: 2200: 2160:Park Chung Hee 2139: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2100: 2099: 2075: 2073:Happy editing, 2072: 2069:Happy New Year 2052: 2049: 2048: 2043: 2032: 2029: 2028: 2027: 1950:. Thank you. 1918: 1915: 1882:the candidates 1851:eligible users 1840: 1833: 1832: 1830: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1790: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1753: 1731: 1718: 1714: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1670: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1490: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1371: 1370: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1320: 1242: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1144: 1020: 1001: 985:You have been 984: 976: 899: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 775: 742: 717: 659: 621: 618: 616: 614: 613: 556: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 492:WP:CUSTOMSIG/P 487: 486:Your signature 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 365: 359: 358: 357: 356: 355: 235: 234: 189: 186: 168: 163: 111: 101: 85: 82: 62: 59: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2882: 2873: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2857:, you may be 2856: 2855:Ksar el-Kebir 2852: 2848: 2843: 2838: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2816: 2810: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2766: 2764: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2738: 2730: 2728: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2713: 2708: 2707:Ctopics/aware 2701: 2697: 2693: 2685: 2682: 2679: 2676: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2660: 2658: 2653: 2645: 2643: 2642: 2637: 2629: 2620: 2618: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2606: 2605:from editing. 2604: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2579: 2576: 2574: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2566: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2539: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2516: 2514: 2507: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2489: 2484: 2482: 2478:, you may be 2477: 2473: 2469: 2466:This is your 2464: 2456: 2454: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2440: 2433: 2431: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2404: 2398: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2364: 2357: 2355: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2334: 2330: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2244: 2243:WP:COMMONNAME 2239: 2238: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2224:WP:COMMONNAME 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2167: 2165: 2164:WP:COMMONNAME 2161: 2157: 2152: 2150: 2149:WP:COMMONNAME 2145: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2098: 2097: 2094: 2087: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2059:. Spread the 2058: 2051: 2050: 2047: 2044: 2041: 2036: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1992: 1990: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1967: 1962: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1924: 1917:December 2023 1916: 1912: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1895: 1889: 1888: 1883: 1878: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1855: 1853: 1852: 1847: 1846: 1837: 1828: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1788: 1784: 1779: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1754: 1751: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1719: 1715: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1668: 1664: 1663: 1658: 1657: 1652: 1648: 1647:WP:COMPETENCE 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1584:WP:COMPETENCE 1581: 1580: 1575: 1571: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1537: 1532: 1530: 1525: 1523: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1491: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1476: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1390:. Thank you. 1389: 1385: 1381: 1376: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1321: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1293: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1248: 1241:November 2023 1240: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1176: 1175:I take a note 1171: 1167: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1099: 1098:I take a note 1094: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1024: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 998: 994: 990: 989: 980: 975: 974: 970: 966: 962: 957: 953: 949: 948: 942: 940: 936: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 912: 904: 898: 894: 884: 880: 876: 872: 868: 864: 863: 862: 858: 854: 850: 849: 848: 844: 840: 836: 832: 828: 827: 826: 822: 818: 812: 807: 797: 793: 789: 785: 781: 776: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 757: 756: 752: 748: 743: 740: 736: 732: 729: 727: 723: 718: 715: 711: 710: 709: 705: 701: 696: 695: 694: 690: 686: 682: 678: 677: 676: 672: 668: 664: 660: 658: 654: 650: 646: 642: 641: 640: 639: 635: 631: 626: 619: 617: 612: 608: 604: 600: 596: 592: 591: 590: 589: 585: 581: 577: 573: 568: 566: 562: 554: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 531: 530: 526: 522: 518: 514: 513: 512: 511: 507: 503: 498: 495:you can read 493: 485: 479: 475: 471: 467: 458: 457: 456: 452: 448: 443: 439: 438: 437: 436: 432: 428: 424: 419: 415: 411: 410: 404: 402: 398: 394: 390: 386: 382: 378: 370: 364: 360: 354: 350: 346: 341: 340: 339: 335: 331: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 306: 305: 304: 300: 296: 292: 290: 283: 279: 276:. Were I not 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 253: 251: 249: 247: 245: 243: 240: 233: 229: 225: 222: 218: 214: 213: 212: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 187: 185: 184: 181: 178: 174: 167: 164: 162: 161: 157: 153: 148: 146: 141: 139: 134: 132: 127: 124: 119: 110: 106: 102: 100: 99: 95: 91: 83: 81: 80: 76: 72: 68: 60: 58: 57: 53: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 24: 16: 2839: 2824:welcome page 2806: 2770: 2750:welcome page 2734: 2716: 2691: 2689: 2661: 2656: 2654: 2639: 2635: 2633: 2600: 2582: 2577: 2572: 2567: 2559:disruptively 2543: 2540:Edit warring 2515: 2486: 2479: 2468:only warning 2467: 2460: 2441: 2437: 2416: 2400: 2399: 2368: 2358:Edit warring 2345:Slatersteven 2338: 2321:toobigtokale 2297:toobigtokale 2283:toobigtokale 2254:toobigtokale 2204:Toobigtokale 2190:toobigtokale 2175:toobigtokale 2168: 2153: 2141: 2103: 2089: 2088: 2054: 2053: 2045: 1995: 1994: 1986: 1963: 1948:my talk page 1920: 1885: 1879: 1856: 1849: 1843: 1841: 1726: 1723:substantial 1722: 1711: 1667:in this case 1666: 1661: 1660: 1656:proven facts 1655: 1654: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1578: 1577: 1573: 1568: 1567: 1564: 1556: 1552: 1534: 1528: 1527: 1521: 1516: 1494: 1451: 1448:edit summary 1436: 1372: 1305: 1272:my talk page 1268:your sandbox 1264:edit summary 1244: 1174: 1173: 1169: 1147: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1097: 1096: 1074: 1070: 1062: 1032: 993:edit warring 986: 960: 944: 943: 908: 779: 720: 623: 615: 569: 558: 489: 422: 406: 405: 374: 321: 286: 257: 236: 191: 188:Edit-warring 170: 149: 142: 135: 128: 125: 113: 87: 64: 20: 2828:– robertsky 2718:TylerBurden 2712:template. 2641:contentious 2555:collaborate 2522:Go for it. 2444:2.49.40.106 2421:2.49.40.106 2387:noticeboard 2216:Kim Jong Un 2212:Kim Jong Il 2208:Kim Il Sung 2171:WP:NCKOREAN 2144:Ko Yong Hui 1926:Hello, I'm 1887:voting page 1613:WP:TEAHOUSE 1545:Kim Il Sung 1541:North Korea 1458:. Thanks! 1250:Hello, I'm 1103:very biased 1054:this thread 931:noticeboard 393:noticeboard 328:". Cheers. 239:Kim Jong Un 194:Kim Jong Un 152:Fantastiera 34:; they are 2815:guidelines 2731:April 2024 2692:procedures 2457:March 2024 2120:The Herald 1871:topic bans 1708:The Herald 1678:Hammersoft 1645:" – again 1631:The Herald 1555:1" in the 1513:The Herald 1475:The Herald 1339:The Herald 1292:The Herald 1274:. Thanks. 1252:The Herald 1213:Hammersoft 1199:Hammersoft 1134:Hammersoft 1093:Hammersoft 1079:Hammersoft 1063:Very light 1035:Hammersoft 788:Hammersoft 714:Hammersoft 700:Hammersoft 681:Hammersoft 667:Hammersoft 535:Hammersoft 517:Hammersoft 502:Hammersoft 363:Kazakhstan 345:Hammersoft 310:Hammersoft 295:Hammersoft 103:Help with 90:Capitals00 2851:synthesis 2803:July 2024 2664:carefully 2585:talk page 2561:, and to 2472:vandalize 2470:; if you 2379:consensus 2375:talk page 1867:site bans 1783:WP:BURDEN 1750:WP:BURDEN 1388:Elon Musk 1008:consensus 1006:and seek 923:consensus 919:talk page 565:permalink 385:consensus 381:talk page 282:this edit 48:Shellwood 17:July 2023 2591:or seek 2551:edit war 2415:warring— 2389:or seek 2371:edit war 2061:WikiLove 1952:Skyerise 1932:Demiurge 1928:Skyerise 1817:contribs 1766:contribs 1579:does not 1531:calendar 1524:calendar 959:warring— 933:or seek 915:edit war 867:Beshogur 853:Beshogur 835:Beshogur 831:Beshogur 817:Beshogur 769:contribs 625:Beshogur 584:contribs 572:WP:CIVIL 470:Beshogur 442:Beshogur 427:Beshogur 421:warring— 395:or seek 377:edit war 278:involved 177:UtherSRG 2863:Skitash 2754:Veverve 2603:blocked 2601:may be 2412:reverts 2335:editwar 2317:WP:RMUM 2214:" and " 1894:NoACEMM 1787:WP:ONUS 1717:points. 1651:WP:IDHT 1588:WP:IDHT 988:blocked 965:Skitash 956:reverts 911:Tunisia 897:Tunisia 871:DeCausa 418:reverts 71:Kleuske 2789:Egeymi 2774:Egeymi 2524:Drmies 2506:Drmies 2491:Drmies 2341:wp:brd 2249:sense. 2067:and a 1639:no one 1608:inline 1565:citing 1551:, is " 784:WP:1RR 780:length 324:, see 308:Dear @ 268:, and 180:(talk) 2646:does 2013:Idell 1996:Idell 1637:." – 1557:Juche 1553:Juche 1536:Juche 1529:Juche 1522:Juche 1517:DON'T 1444:often 1302:India 1300:from 1260:India 1258:from 537:Done 258:after 173:WP:RM 2867:talk 2832:talk 2820:test 2793:talk 2778:talk 2758:talk 2722:talk 2700:here 2666:and 2612:talk 2528:talk 2495:talk 2448:talk 2425:talk 2349:talk 2325:talk 2301:talk 2287:talk 2272:talk 2258:talk 2232:talk 2210:", " 2194:talk 2179:talk 2128:talk 2109:talk 2081:talk 2021:talk 2002:talk 1956:talk 1905:talk 1857:The 1813:talk 1798:talk 1785:and 1762:talk 1740:talk 1690:talk 1649:and 1621:talk 1596:talk 1586:and 1574:ONLY 1503:talk 1484:talk 1464:talk 1426:talk 1411:talk 1396:talk 1364:talk 1347:talk 1329:talk 1314:talk 1280:talk 1221:talk 1203:talk 1184:talk 1156:talk 1138:talk 1120:talk 1083:talk 1071:very 1039:talk 969:talk 879:talk 857:talk 843:talk 821:talk 792:talk 765:talk 751:talk 735:talk 704:talk 689:talk 671:talk 653:talk 634:talk 607:talk 580:talk 543:talk 525:talk 506:talk 474:talk 451:talk 431:talk 349:talk 334:talk 299:talk 228:talk 206:talk 156:talk 107:and 94:talk 75:talk 52:talk 2861:. 2648:not 2434:RFC 2397:. 2151:). 1973:or 1736:JBW 1674:JBW 1572:is 1422:JBW 1306:You 1166:JBW 1152:JBW 1075:any 941:. 811:JBW 645:JBW 630:JBW 403:. 318:JBW 314:JBW 217:JBW 202:JBW 143:3. 136:2. 129:1. 2869:) 2834:) 2795:) 2780:) 2760:) 2724:) 2710:}} 2704:{{ 2652:. 2614:) 2530:) 2497:) 2485:. 2450:) 2427:) 2351:) 2327:) 2303:) 2289:) 2274:) 2260:) 2234:) 2196:) 2181:) 2130:) 2111:) 2083:) 2023:) 2004:) 1958:) 1907:) 1896:}} 1892:{{ 1869:, 1819:) 1815:/ 1800:) 1768:) 1764:/ 1742:) 1710:. 1692:) 1623:) 1598:) 1505:) 1486:) 1466:) 1428:) 1413:) 1398:) 1366:) 1349:) 1331:) 1316:) 1282:) 1223:) 1205:) 1186:) 1158:) 1140:) 1122:) 1085:) 1041:) 1033:-- 1029:. 999:. 971:) 881:) 859:) 845:) 823:) 794:) 771:) 767:/ 753:) 737:) 719:"@ 706:) 691:) 673:) 655:) 636:) 609:) 586:) 582:/ 545:) 527:) 508:) 476:) 453:) 433:) 351:) 343:-- 336:) 320:I 301:) 264:, 230:) 208:) 158:) 96:) 77:) 54:) 2865:( 2830:( 2791:( 2776:( 2756:( 2720:( 2610:( 2526:( 2504:@ 2493:( 2446:( 2423:( 2347:( 2323:( 2299:( 2285:( 2270:( 2256:( 2230:( 2202:@ 2192:( 2177:( 2126:( 2118:@ 2107:( 2079:( 2019:( 2011:@ 2000:( 1991:. 1954:( 1903:( 1811:( 1796:( 1760:( 1738:( 1688:( 1680:@ 1676:@ 1672:@ 1633:" 1629:@ 1619:( 1594:( 1511:@ 1501:( 1482:( 1473:@ 1462:( 1424:( 1409:( 1394:( 1362:( 1345:( 1337:@ 1327:( 1312:( 1294:: 1290:@ 1278:( 1219:( 1211:@ 1201:( 1182:( 1164:@ 1154:( 1136:( 1118:( 1091:@ 1081:( 1037:( 1018:. 967:( 877:( 865:@ 855:( 841:( 829:@ 819:( 813:: 809:@ 790:( 763:( 749:( 741:" 733:( 712:@ 702:( 687:( 679:@ 669:( 651:( 643:@ 632:( 605:( 593:@ 578:( 563:( 541:( 533:@ 523:( 515:@ 504:( 472:( 449:( 440:@ 429:( 347:( 332:( 297:( 291:. 226:( 215:@ 204:( 154:( 120:: 116:@ 92:( 73:( 50:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index