67:. Please discuss problems with that user, not me. Just because my user name clearly states I adore Patsy Cline doesn't neccessarily mean I wrote all that information on Cline. In a way I am insulted from your remarks. Contact that user on the talk page to discuss problems with the article. I do understand however not to delete the informaton on top. That was a mistake of my wrongdoing. I would prefer a reply as well from you as soon as possible after you have read this message. Thank you. (
98:
439:
a decade: please note that I know 3RR does not imply that we are entitled to 3 reverts. What I am stating that your template warning without discussion was premature and lacked good faith, particularly because I do not believe the reverts violated 3RR nor did I breach the rule even if I am wrong in believing that. In the future, please take care before using such templates.
323:
438:
While the fact that Ms. Goodman revealed
Satoshi Nakamoto's identity is relevant to her biography, the enumeration of everything that may or may not have been in said reveal are not, and introduce a biased tone (e.g., that she was doxxing). Again, I have been a Knowledge editor for the better part of
412:
How was the information "biased" or "poorly sourced"? I know that the page has just come out of semi-protection following a string of IP vandal edits, but the information doesn't seem particularly biased to me. A little re-wording to make it sound less like criticism might be useful, but repeated
140:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
175:
status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually
62:
I understand what you have said, however, I was not the one who wrote the article for Patsy Cline. The only way I have contributed to her article was with images and I created her singles and albums charts. I have also added some trivia. The user who wrote her information was
417:
notes that we're not entitled to 3 reverts - that's just a rule beyond which blocking can be done by admins - and some of your reverts had no edit summary. As far as "out of line" goes, that essay you quote (it's not a policy) also says that
365:, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Knowledge is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a
16:
Wow, I cant belive you have been here for over a month and no one ever left a dicussion for you! Well, welcome to
Knowledge, even though this is a little late! Anyways, Im giving you the user box for your user page called
136:
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
216:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following
179:
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the
122:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
285:
176:
sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
346:, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
342:
another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on
Knowledge this is usually seen as obstructing the
229:
119:
395:
391:
225:
141:
130:
115:
361:. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the
245:
145:
183:
137:
210:
206:
200:
366:
358:
351:
386:"Removal of biased, contentious material that violates the policy on biographies of living persons (BLP)" is
343:
64:
362:
331:
327:
302:
CeBIT - I changed it, what do you mean it still reads like an advertisement? Could you be more specific?--
167:
159:
126:
106:
18:
83:
82:
If you feel you can do a better job writing Patsy Cline's article, then you write her article yourself. (
68:
428:
375:
33:
171:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the
335:
263:
440:
399:
49:
347:
268:
307:
233:
194:
111:
423:
387:
370:
262:
Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York
Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @
249:
149:
22:
419:
339:
97:
414:
303:
239:
222:
Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
118:
as to why its use in
Knowledge articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the
21:. It's a user box that says your a member of the AWWDMBJ.... Hope you like it! —
289:
390:. Nevertheless, I had reverted the contentious material exactly 3 times before
357:
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be
172:
322:
448:
433:
407:
380:
311:
292:
271:
252:
152:
110:. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
86:
71:
52:
38:
190:
281:
In order to defeat the "deletionists" would you be prepared to
96:
217:
334:
with one or more editors according to your reverts at
213:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
244:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
144:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
193:. If you believe the media meets the criteria at
413:deletion is unnecessary. Please also note that
8:
93:Fair use rationale for Image:184383406 l.jpg
420:recipients should still assume good faith
189:tag can be used to release it under the
207:Knowledge:Image copyright tags#Fair use
228:. If the image is copyrighted under a
7:
394:, so your warning was premature and
205:or one of the other tags listed at
14:
330:. You appear to be engaged in an
321:
246:Media copyright questions page
242:after 00:23, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
211:Knowledge:Image copyright tags
146:Media copyright questions page
1:
293:11:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
120:boilerplate fair use template
312:22:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
226:criteria for speedy deletion
142:criteria for speedy deletion
39:03:34, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
87:15:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
72:21:15, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
53:19:07, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
469:
392:requesting semi-protection
258:Knowledge New York Meet-Up
238:the image will be deleted
127:the image description page
449:17:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
434:17:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
408:16:48, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
381:16:28, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
272:23:33, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
129:and edit it to include a
444:
403:
253:00:23, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
184:GFDL-self-no-disclaimers
153:00:23, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
116:explanation or rationale
158:Unspecified source for
48:I'm able to help.... --
344:normal editing process
338:. Although repeatedly
101:
286:Safia Aoude's article
168:Image:184383406 l.jpg
165:Thanks for uploading
160:Image:184383406 l.jpg
107:Image:184383406 l.jpg
104:Thanks for uploading
100:
359:blocked from editing
340:reverting or undoing
336:Leah McGrath Goodman
328:welcome to Knowledge
264:Knowledge:Meetup/NYC
201:non-free fair use in
197:, use a tag such as
19:Template:User Member
234:Knowledge:Fair use
224:, as described on
195:Knowledge:Fair use
131:fair use rationale
102:
363:three-revert rule
460:
431:
426:
388:not edit warring
378:
373:
325:
230:non-free license
204:
188:
182:
138:my contributions
114:but there is no
65:Patsycline's1fan
36:
31:
28:
25:
468:
467:
463:
462:
461:
459:
458:
457:
429:
424:
376:
371:
319:
300:
279:
269:David Shankbone
260:
203:|article name}}
198:
186:
180:
163:
95:
80:
60:
46:
34:
29:
26:
23:
12:
11:
5:
466:
464:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
318:
315:
299:
296:
278:
275:
266:
259:
256:
162:
156:
94:
91:
84:LovePatsyCline
79:
76:
69:LovePatsyCline
59:
56:
45:
42:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
465:
450:
446:
442:
437:
436:
435:
432:
427:
421:
416:
411:
410:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
384:
383:
382:
379:
374:
369:. Thank you.
368:
364:
360:
355:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
324:
316:
314:
313:
309:
305:
297:
295:
294:
291:
287:
284:
276:
274:
273:
270:
265:
257:
255:
254:
251:
247:
243:
241:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
214:
212:
208:
202:
196:
192:
185:
177:
174:
170:
169:
161:
157:
155:
154:
151:
147:
143:
139:
134:
132:
128:
125:Please go to
123:
121:
117:
113:
109:
108:
99:
92:
90:
88:
85:
78:Another Reply
77:
75:
73:
70:
66:
57:
55:
54:
51:
43:
41:
40:
37:
32:
20:
356:
320:
301:
282:
280:
261:
248:. Thank you.
237:
221:
215:
178:
166:
164:
148:. Thank you.
135:
124:
105:
103:
81:
61:
47:
15:
396:out of line
326:Hello, and
277:Safia Aoude
250:Betacommand
150:Betacommand
44:Patsy Cline
422:. Thanks,
317:March 2014
441:GregChant
400:GregChant
352:talk page
348:consensus
218:this link
173:copyright
50:Gold-Horn
332:edit war
304:Moenni01
240:48 hours
112:fair use
58:Replying
350:on the
236:) then
430:Murray
415:WP:3RR
377:Murray
290:Phase4
209:. See
367:block
298:CeBIT
232:(per
445:talk
425:Ruby
404:talk
372:Ruby
308:talk
283:keep
191:GFDL
447:)
406:)
398:.
354:.
310:)
267:--
220:.
199:{{
187:}}
181:{{
133:.
89:)
74:)
443:(
402:(
306:(
288:?
35:ε
30:e
27:o
24:M
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
