995:, protecting user pages full of insults don't transmit anything positive about you. Some of those insults have been posted by you, like " is awarded for going beyond the call of duty to protect the article "Javier Solana" from attack by rather 'strange' people". "Strange" isn't a word to use in reference to any person and far less in the Knowledge (XXG). Ah, and be more clever. SqueakBox is accessing the Knowledge (XXG) from an IP, it's been proved, and you and nobody has blocked him. Your bias against me is evident. So, if you repeat your attacks against me I will start the process to have you desysoped.
1100:
contact the learning institution itself for verification. So far I have been correct in my suspicions. The subject gets upset when you show them they were lying. There is a paranoid claim like "you were out to get them." When really all you sought was verification, because things the subject wrote or said sounded "fishy". I wouldn't be surprised if
Shermer's credentials are a "teensy bit" exaggerated. Critical historians are very suspicious of autobiographies. If the author likes themself they have a tendency to make themselves look good.
31:
1549:) and characterise it as such, you actually imply that said editions are neither. I've added content (at least to the Trinidad and Tobago article) regarding its overall geographic location that was not present beforehand, only to have it reverted because of 'legalistic' niceties. I have taken your comments under advisement, but you could be a lot more productive by copyediting instead of reverting useful information
83:
75:
91:
1319:, I count 10 who desired Merge, 6 for all other solutions... It was an entirely separate article, it seemed (in this case) to make sense to make it an entirely separate section -- if it doesn't scan well or there are artifacts, go ahead and fix it. I think just deleting the material negates the community consensus on the AfD, which after all was Merge and not Delete.
190:. You have now violated two separate policies in the course of your attacks on me. In addition, by simply deleting the comments (which detailed your policy violation) you have done what you scolded me for doing. Stop your nonsense. As I said before, try editing articles instead of going on policy-violation sprees.
1570:
I didn't remove "useful information" - first I removed factually incorrect information, and then I removed horribly written trivia. Knowledge (XXG) is hypertext - there is no need to explain that the Lesser
Antilles are part of the Caribbean. More importantly, if you feel the need to insert trivia,
1435:
Hey
Guetterda thanks a lot for sending the needfull, and also thanks a lot for those words of help you said but listen what I have is the book that has been printed by the organization itself so will it be ok to put those details as it is? Because as you see I can reffer to these books for more clear
1007:
That is, "restoring JosĂ© Luis RodrĂguez
Zapatero from the POV of another user who claims to write about saints." when Hagiographer means exactly to "write about saints" isn't a direct attack? I'm the first who would like to forget SqueakBox forever but I can't do it while he's insulting me right now.
928:
I'm still working on it, I think most of articles in the top category will go to a subcategory (it's already down from 86 to 23). The tree is not perfect yet, but I think it was necessary to bring some order into this category. Feel free to check, correct or help out :-) Basically every island should
522:
That's why at my law school, evals are collected pre-final exam, pre-grade. This is a big problem incidentally, since in the final exam is often the only piece of assessment, accounting for 90-100% percent of the grade in the vast majority of exam classes. So if a professor taught well, but designed
507:
I suppose my underlying concern comes from my experience with teaching evaluations. Student evaluations can influence hiring, tenure and promotion for faculty and teaching assistants. Getting good evaluations pays off, getting bad evaluations can hurt you. I believe that this is a major driver of
185:
have been unintentional, your refusal to address my concerns suggests that it was intentional. Your next personal attack seems intentional, since you made the same sort of statements which, when made by me, you called a personal attack. I wouldn't have considered it a personal attack, but based on
1444:
Odd, how all the RV's, that I get come from the same group that hangs out on the evolution pages. What are the chances out of about 1.4 million pages on
Knowledge (XXG), all the reverts, RFG's, etc. I get are from a small group of people who post to a few common pages? I am beginning to think
764:
does not score as "objectively real" with the creationists because the creationists do not have the cognitive apparatus and experience within which the presentation could ever in a million years--without enormous evolutionary advancements of the creationists' cognitive apparatus--score with them as
593:
More to the point, it's hard to figure out what you mean by editorialising. You say you speak for
Weyrich, but you are altering what TheocracyWatch had to say; your assertion that Wiccans are satanists is inaccurate; and the language you are inserting is less neutral and more opinionated than what
1277:
For something like an
Olympic medalist, I don't think that it's wrong to have a small number of people in that category. For consistency sake, I think it's important to have all the countries represented. If consensus turns out not to be the case, it's easy to change the categories and reorganize.
751:
Separate from my cognition, I would say, is "fact"--which the standard
English dictionary defines as "Information presented as objectively real." And what is "objectively real" depends critically on the experience level of the audience. I can present something which for me and for other informed
269:
This isn't worth my time anymore because of a personal attack you on another user. I have removed your comments from my talk page and have no interest in discussing the matter anymore. Feel free to get the last word in and then archive this conversation. The facts are in the history; I will let
1423:
Hello friend? I do have a question. Now that the pagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Pentecostal_Mission#sent_an_email_to_author has been deleted, and now that we are asking for permission from the authors of that book why do we have to contact them? See we have our own book about the churuch, maybe
491:
Have been talking in circles, you mean? FM and JZ have said all there is to say. You have ignored their rationale and continue to revert to a less accurate version. Are you saying that if I add "listen to JZ and FM" on the talk page you will suddenly see the light? What is the point of adding
1349:
since a large number of your fellow editors want the material (which someone did hella work to compile) to exist in the article. However, I did stop my work on the AfD backlog to fix the text, which you could have done and saved us all extra work. In the future when something like this comes up,
1099:
Thanks for pointing out my error. I think it has been corrected. I have found scholarly credentials are commonly copied from one place to another. They are sometimes very difficult to track down to the original sources. When I am very suspicious, you must have some knowledge about the subject, I
1436:
detail. And about permission the organization does not have any such rule or authorized person or lable to get permission from it is free to do so. Will that be ok. Thanks a lot from my heart.Will suerly do the needful as on outsider. Rencin
Matthew.rencin24 06:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
961:. Sorry this has gotten lost amidst the bickering, which I'm not especially interested in. If a sentence says "Paul Weyrich is orange, and the sky is pink" I'm not going to hesitate to challenge the statement that the sky is pink even if I have no opinion on the hue of the article subject.-
1462:
Has it occurred to you that often people are interested in the same subjects? If you look at the
Astronomy pages, you will see the same names again and again. Same for Abortion related articles, Religious and mythology related,etc. Accusing established editors and indeed Administrators of
1012:
recommends or at least recognize it's difficult not to believe you're helping SqueakBox to insult me because he helped you in the past to harass other users. (You can remove your own personal attacks from that page, if not I might post in my own user page that you're "strange")
571:
You are editorializing, period. It is not permitted to attempt to get inside someone's head or say what they intended to do. I cleared up the inaccuracies that your edit restored. Considering that I know Mr. Weyrich personally, I feel I understand his views better than you do.
781:
on whatever shores they fulfilled their mission. One religion presents as "fact" what the audience cannot ever accept as "fact" unless they convert and believe by faith what they cannot--with their limited experience and cognitive ability--ever see as "objective reality."
200:
I thought you said you have no ongoing conversation with me and told me to stop replying (or harrassing as you said)? Yet here you are days later bringing the issue up again - seems like your accusation of harrasment is quickly turning around towards you. And if you read
457:
1593:
Hey man I just finished creating the page. Now can anything be done on this? if so please do let me know. It will be of great help to know how to let the page to be brought to its initial stages.Thanks buddy.rencin24 10:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
1370:"? You closed the article as a Merge. In the world of AFD, a merge is a keep. So no, you're wrong there - I did not "recreate a dfeleted article". Please don't make false accusations of policy violations against me. That is highly offensive.
1142:
on the GA review page, but the problem is I don't know how to evaluate the source someone has provided to argue that the page isn't sufficiently broad by leaving something out about bacteria resistance or something, could you take a look? It's at
295:
be worried. I find it amusing that a person who cannot accumulate 350 mainspace edits in over a year and who cannot follow the rules they scold others about takes it upon himself to try to drive people who actually contribute encyclopaedic
1341:. While I appreciate your faith in my ability to do everything, I don't have the temporal resources to close AfD's and edit the merges to complete satisfaction. You can't just recreate the article when a large number of your fellow editors
594:
was there before. If you know Weyrich well enough to speak for him then you probably shouldn't be editing the article anyway - if you are too close to the issue to be objective then I suggest that you stay on the article's Talk page.
646:
I'll be moving to Connecticut tomorrow along with my family. I'll be leaving Knowledge (XXG) for a while until everything gets set up at our new home. It all depends on my Internet access, but I'll be seeing you in a week or two. Bye!
1463:
sockpuppetry is completely unacceptable, as is your habit of telling everyone with whom you disagree to "lay off" or "cut it out". Who the hell are you to order Guettarda or myself what to do? I've had about enough of your attitude.
1122:
Yeah, good. I have just returned from the mountains and starting next semester in the middle of September. It will be tough I think. :) Btw, I have uploaded some photos also from mountains to Commons, you can check them out. -
219:
You have a remarkable ability to twist the truth, don't you? Calling me a liar is a clear personal attack on your part. To begin with, I have not, to the best of my knowledge, said anything that was false, let along
121:
I have no ongoing conversation with you. Someone who engages in personal attacks while lecturing others about personal attacks is just trolling. We have no ongoing conversation. Please lay off the harrassment. I'm
205:
you would have seen that saying someone has lied or is lying is not a personal attack. In any case, I'm off to the movies and will be posting a RfC against you when I get back so that other parties can get involved.
692:
924:
Maybe the Antilles category could be removed, it only has three childs at the moment. Lesser and Greater Antilles would be direct childs of Caribbean islands then. Also, maybe the Leeward Antilles could form a
1337:. and ten user agreed that (1) the article should not exist as a separate article, and (2) on the other hand the material should not be deleted, and (3) therefore the material should be moved into the article
1292:
I sometimes venture into articles dealing with Guyana, Trinidad, and Suriname. Mainly I looked at Basdeo PAnday and Naipual. Is there a stub marker for Trinidad bio? I tried a load of combos but it did not
353:
You have violated the 3 revert rule on the AIDS dissidents category page. Please undo your changes and see the discussion underway on the talk page, and participate if you feel you have something to add.
239:
no ongoing conversation, which is why I archived the page. I raised a separate issue, which was your ongoing harrassment on me, your false accusations and your ongoing personal attacks against me. So no,
752:
people is "objectively real"--but if my audience does not have the experience within which what I say is "objectively real" for them, then I have failed to score a "fact" with that particular audience.
1334:
1316:
321:
Just a word of support. Don't let anyone bait you into acting in a way that doesn't well reflect your integrity. Be well and calm and confident in your contributions and you'll be just fine. :) --
453:
1023:
Feel free to call me "strange" on your user page, if you lay off picking fights with people. If that's what it takes for you to settle down and stop obsessing about SB, then be my guest.
456:, the first bill in history that contains an article from Knowledge (XXG). It appeared on DYK and right away somebody "tags" it for deletion. I inviteyou to express yourself here:
508:
grade inflation, which lowers the overall quality of tertiary education. There are enough forces which limit your fearlessness as an admin. While there are a few people who are
908:
478:
about your reversions? We've been discussing this material for several days, and it would be nice if you would add your input if you continue to revert our changes. Thanks,
1194:
582:
The edit you make has inaccurate information. Stop inserting inaccurate information and people will stop reverting you. Oh, and try to keep your edit summaries accurate.
632:
article, I thought I would ask for your input into a discussion myself and the other editors are having. Please see the talk page and contribute whatever you want. Thanks
270:
others make their own conclusions from it. I am not worried about my actions. Do not comment on my talk page regarding this issue again or I will simply revert on sight.
820:
While or is exclusive in boolean logic, it definitely is not exclusive in English. So yes, the rationale for your edit is mistaken. Guettarda 13:15, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
387:. Some sections are a bit out of my area of expertise and someone with a more solid background in Caribbean biology could provide some help/expertise/enlightment.
1449:. Funny thing is that I am a well-known figure in human evolutionary biology who discovered one of the few real examples of classic Darwinian evolution in humans
823:
I gave you two sources to back up my view point. Please provide some sources for yours. However, if you have a problems with my edit, please take this up in
402:
Whatever you can give me is fine by me. The article still has two to three days before I move it to main space. You can give your advice after it is moved to
1379:
Err, um, OK, not to split hairs. Anyway, on consideration, I realized you right about the whole thing. I slapped myself with a trout, and it hurt like hell.
103:
Please note that archiving talk page discussions, while they are in progress, could be taken as misleading and/or hostile and at the very least violates
1164:
1157:
903:
147:
comment appies to. Compounded by the fact that when you restored the archive to your liking, you also deleted my reply to one of your comments.
543:
The solution has to be a professor eval before the exam and an exam-only eval after the exam. But they're not doing it despite suggestions... -
475:
383:
Hi Guettarda, long time no see. Hope all is well. I am just writing to ask for your opinion on an article I am writing. It is currently in my
164:
Article? Think you're a bit confused. Deleted your comment? It's still in the page history - don't get so attached to your own verbiage.
244:- your harrassment, personal attacks, and ongoing false accusations against me. Which I have not archived, in case you didn't notice. "
523:
an awful exam (say, way too easy, which is a big problem, given the mandatory curve), there is no way to reflect that in the ratings. -
1085:
Could you delete the email containing section on my page? I seem to always screw up when I try to just delete specific difs. Thanks.
1144:
859:
were only a part of the Caribbean islands, but it appears all of the Caribbean islands are also in the Antilles. What do you think?
1189:, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to
664:
1182:
1059:
there is no possibility of having experimental science or hypothesis testing in a system which fails to exclude the supernatural
143:
If you want to end the discussion that's fine. However getting the last word in then quickly archiving the page is what the my
744:
I agree with you. I agree with you because my act of what you call "observation" is inescapably shaped by the mechanics of my
609:
I'm chipping in as a mediator. IF you agree with me working on the case, please drop a note stating so on my talk page. --
760:
presents evolution as "fact"--that is, he presents evolution as "information that he presents as objectively real." But
228:
it makes statements about me as a person. So no, you are incorrect when you say that you have not made personal attacks.
1445:
you-all are sockpuppets. Anyway, cut it out. Sorry if I stepped on some toes with the anticreationists by supporting
554:
534:
1190:
855:, you may want to check this category as well, to check for mistakes. There's something I'm not sure of: I thought the
1330:
248:" - you keep engaging in personal attacks and making false accusations against me. As soon as I became aware of your
803:
Nope, "or" is exclusive in normal English language. In logic, the concept of "or" is a little bit more tricky. See
975:
you can explain something in a few words that the help article couldn't explain in something longer than a thesis?
865:
852:
1228:
929:
be as low as possible into the tree. Also this tree should be for the islands, not for countries / cities / etc.
888:
878:
1424:
that could help you out to do something!! Please do let me know. Thanks.rencin24 08:30, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
898:
883:
1112:
Yeah, it was my intention to make it sound like Slim Shady. It is nice to hear from you again. How are you? -
186:
your logic I assume you meant it as one. However, your latest accusation was an unequivocal violation of out
688:
325:
1599:
1466:
Consider this a formal warning to cease harassing editors with whom you are involved in a content dispute.
1407:
774:
52:
648:
41:
1554:
1523:
1522:
Hello ... noted, but the same could be said of your comments. Please be more discerning in the future.
1297:
384:
873:
1470:
1225:
940:
828:
812:
684:
660:
573:
550:
530:
403:
761:
104:
1483:
769:
From a very secular viewpoint in which there is no God, never has been a God, never will be a God,
427:
271:
207:
148:
112:
17:
1038:
That's why it's called the Workshop. Feel free to add additional names with representative edits.
1101:
706:
680:
458:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Dr. Jose Celso Barbosa Post Office Building Designation Act
322:
1595:
1506:
1403:
1198:
1139:
1014:
999:
958:
944:
930:
770:
757:
482:
461:
411:
392:
1446:
1380:
1351:
1320:
1294:
1247:
Someone is posting not to positive things about you, and want to bring it to your attention.
1039:
629:
30:
1009:
724:
Greetings, my friend! I have appreciated and relished your thoughts and careful analyses.
202:
187:
1148:
1068:
848:
656:
611:
545:
525:
431:
512:
fearless, starting people off like that seems to be a good way to produce cowed admins.
1572:
1533:
1497:
1487:
1371:
1208:
1024:
824:
595:
583:
513:
493:
369:
339:
301:
253:
191:
165:
131:
58:
808:
1453:
1279:
1250:
1168:
1124:
1113:
1064:
1575:
1557:
1536:
1526:
1509:
1500:
1490:
1473:
1456:
1410:
1383:
1374:
1354:
1323:
1302:
1282:
1267:
1253:
1211:
1201:
1171:
1151:
1127:
1116:
1089:
1075:
1042:
1027:
1017:
1002:
982:
965:
947:
933:
831:
815:
786:
713:
699:
669:
636:
615:
598:
586:
576:
558:
538:
516:
496:
485:
464:
434:
415:
396:
372:
358:
342:
328:
304:
274:
256:
210:
194:
168:
151:
134:
115:
68:
1264:
1086:
1072:
979:
962:
783:
739:
633:
479:
407:
388:
1571:
don't insert in into the middle of an existing sentance. It's just bad writing.
82:
74:
1450:
1233:
745:
355:
90:
1338:
1309:
710:
696:
65:
1402:
article; I reverted once and want others to check it before I do it again.
851:. Correct if you think it is wrong. I've been doing this while cleaning up
804:
1346:
856:
334:
Thanks Ryan. You're awesome as always. I'm far too stressed (real life
1545:
I meant exactly what I said. When you format commentary using italics (
693:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Black billionaire (2nd nomination)
368:
to the page in 24 hours. Please stop adding nonsense to my talk page.
778:
233:
I thought you said you have no ongoing conversation with me and told me
109:
you should leave current, ongoing discussions on the existing talk page
126:
to take a break. I don't have the patience for the regular crap - I
988:
I believe you should learn to use your privileges in a positive way
1263:
Thanks for rving to the one I meant to rv to on the Ross article.
81:
1399:
1317:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/PYGMIES + DWARFS arguments
1236:
998:
Remove SqueakBox's insults from the user page you've protected.
338:
WP), I'm trying to take a break. Hopefully I'll get a chance.
181:
is a clear personal attack. While your initial personal attack
811:
for more info. Do you actually have problems with my edit? --
733:
evolution happened (and continues to happen) is an observation.
1052:
Hey, buddy, one last question before I'm banned for life. ;-)
444:
Are you Afro-Trinidadian, Indo-Trinidadian or mixed of the 2.
111:. Please allow the discussion to finish before archiving it.
25:
799:"Or" is non-exclusive Guettarda 04:26, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
1315:
Huh? Why not? How else? That's what the people wanted, see
454:
Dr. Jose Celso Barbosa Post Office Building Designation Act
430:, if you're not too busy could you take a look. Thanks. --
1223:
came from, perhaps I just don't do enough crossing out.
1598:
The link for the page is here da. Please do the needfull
605:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for mediation/Armando/Daily Kos
1532:
Really? What comments of mine are you talking about?
1363:
1248:
1063:
Can I get a source for this? And does this include Dr.
993:
738:
I would agree with you. But I also think I understand
179:
1398:
please police an anonymnous editors "summarizing" the
291:
Given your complete disregard for policy, I think you
1553:. Again, please be more discerning in the future.
909:
Category:Islands of the United States Virgin Islands
756:
And what I observe from my experience is that, yes,
1505:Why not? Dozens of countries have such a category.
1243:
Someone is posting not to positive things about you
246:ere you are days later bringing the issue up again
1197:and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
57:
628:As you are obviously taking in interest in the
364:Huh? What are you talking about? I have two
687:, I expect you to at least make a comment at
8:
1167:? This user has continual removed material.
1165:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Vivaldi
1158:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Vivaldi
224:. Your accusation of "lying" is both false
1008:So, please delete that personal attack as
862:At the moment the category tree would be
426:Hi, asked a while ago if you'd read over
130:have no patience with your harrassment.
78:Um, other people may want to use the bed.
45:and will be back on Knowledge (XXG) soon.
1350:maybe consider just fixing it yourself.
847:Hi Guettarda, I've followed the list in
773:is in the same secular situation as the
89:
73:
959:Talk:Paul_Weyrich#Controversial_section
904:Category:Islands of Trinidad and Tobago
1222:Thanks, can't think where <str: -->
870:Caribbean islands not in the Antilles?
252:personal attacks, I replied to them.
7:
1343:don't want it on the Knowledge (XXG)
1145:Knowledge (XXG):Good articles/Review
1177:Please, stop your personal attacks.
1048:Causation and the limits of science
64:What, not even a picture of a cat?
24:
762:Stephen Jay Gould's presentation
705:I have moved everything back to
29:
939:I've copied this discussion to
1576:03:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
1558:14:43, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
1537:03:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
1527:02:48, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
1510:01:43, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
1501:14:51, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
1491:16:33, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
1474:15:35, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
1457:00:43, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
1440:RV on nobel controversies page
1411:16:30, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
1384:05:27, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
1375:12:52, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
1355:07:12, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
1324:18:54, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
1303:02:51, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
1283:21:58, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
1268:05:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
94:One good cat deserves another.
1:
1452:. Not a creationist at all.
1368:recreation of deleted article
1254:18:17, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
1212:15:37, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
1202:07:12, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
1181:Please see Knowledge (XXG)'s
1172:20:29, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
1152:13:03, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
1128:19:50, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
1117:19:39, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
492:snide comments here anyway?
86:Are you even listening to me?
69:09:04, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
642:Well, friends, this is it...
145:could be taken as misleading
1273:Olympic medalist categories
1090:23:26, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
1076:19:49, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
1043:18:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
1028:15:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
1018:14:16, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
1003:06:26, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
983:18:44, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
966:18:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
948:12:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
934:12:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
832:16:12, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
816:05:35, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
787:22:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
714:19:56, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
700:18:54, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
679:As you reverted my move of
670:01:53, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
637:20:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
616:05:20, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
599:03:34, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
587:03:27, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
577:23:22, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
559:17:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
539:15:34, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
517:15:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
497:03:12, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
486:16:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
465:16:20, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
435:02:41, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1616:
1331:PYGMIES + DWARFS arguments
866:Category:Caribbean islands
853:Category:Caribbean islands
474:WOuld you care to comment
416:23:36, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
397:23:16, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
373:05:38, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
359:05:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
349:Violation of 3 revert rule
343:01:08, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
329:01:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
305:05:50, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
275:02:28, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
257:00:41, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
211:00:46, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
195:23:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
188:policy on personal attacks
169:23:17, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
152:02:11, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
135:01:04, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
1496:Why Biota of Lithuania?
1163:Can we move to close the
889:Category:Islands of Haiti
879:Category:Greater Antilles
777:when they confronted the
116:23:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
1069:survival of bodily death
899:Category:Lesser Antilles
884:Category:Islands of Cuba
621:Michael Lee-Chin Article
242:this is a separate issue
1518:RE: Trinidad and Tobago
1193:for disruption. Please
1138:There's a dispute over
953:Weyrich/First Amendment
689:Talk:Black billionaires
448:Requesting your opinion
775:Christian missionaries
231:As to your statement "
95:
87:
79:
71:
709:pending consensus. --
300:out of the project.
93:
85:
77:
63:
1134:Could I ask a favor?
941:Talk:Lesser Antilles
765:"objectively real."
720:Your worthy comments
685:Wealthy black people
675:Wealthy black people
452:I wrote the article
404:Fauna of Puerto Rico
99:Archiving Talk Pages
1185:policy. Comment on
1183:no personal attacks
428:G. Ledyard Stebbins
222:intentionally false
18:User talk:Guettarda
1345:, nor delete from
707:Black billionaires
681:Black billionaires
470:Godless discussion
323:User:RyanFreisling
96:
88:
80:
72:
39:is taking a short
1140:Natural Selection
1067:'s research into
971:How is it that...
874:Category:Antilles
771:Stephen Jay Gould
758:Stephen Jay Gould
668:
614:
557:
537:
178:Calling me a liar
55:
49:
48:
1607:
1555:Cogito ergo sumo
1524:Cogito ergo sumo
1447:Raymond Damadian
992:Edits like this
654:
651:
630:Michael Lee-Chin
610:
549:
529:
379:Some help needed
61:
51:
33:
26:
1615:
1614:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1591:
1520:
1481:
1471:KillerChihuahua
1442:
1433:
1431:Thanks but how?
1421:
1396:
1333:was up for AfD
1313:
1300:
1290:
1275:
1261:
1245:
1220:
1179:
1161:
1136:
1110:
1097:
1095:Michael Shermer
1083:
1050:
1036:
990:
973:
955:
849:Lesser Antilles
844:
842:Lesser Antilles
829:Roland Deschain
813:Roland Deschain
797:
722:
677:
649:
644:
623:
607:
569:
505:
472:
462:Tony the Marine
450:
442:
424:
381:
351:
319:
101:
59:
56:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1613:
1611:
1590:
1587:
1585:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1540:
1539:
1519:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1480:
1477:
1468:
1467:
1464:
1441:
1438:
1432:
1429:
1427:
1420:
1417:
1415:
1395:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1358:
1357:
1312:
1306:
1298:
1289:
1286:
1274:
1271:
1260:
1257:
1244:
1241:
1219:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1178:
1175:
1160:
1155:
1135:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1109:
1106:
1096:
1093:
1082:
1079:
1061:
1060:
1049:
1046:
1035:
1032:
1031:
1030:
989:
986:
972:
969:
954:
951:
937:
936:
926:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
911:
906:
896:
895:
894:
891:
886:
871:
860:
843:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
825:Talk:Evolution
796:
790:
768:
755:
736:
735:
721:
718:
717:
716:
676:
673:
643:
640:
622:
619:
606:
603:
602:
601:
590:
589:
568:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
504:
501:
500:
499:
471:
468:
449:
446:
441:
438:
423:
420:
419:
418:
380:
377:
376:
375:
350:
347:
346:
345:
318:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
262:
261:
260:
259:
229:
214:
213:
176:
175:
174:
173:
172:
171:
157:
156:
155:
154:
138:
137:
100:
97:
60:File:Meow3.jpg
50:
47:
46:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1612:
1603:
1601:
1597:
1588:
1586:
1577:
1574:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1559:
1556:
1552:
1551:carte blanche
1548:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1538:
1535:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1525:
1517:
1511:
1508:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1499:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1489:
1485:
1478:
1476:
1475:
1472:
1465:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1455:
1451:
1448:
1439:
1437:
1430:
1428:
1425:
1419:Hello Friend?
1418:
1416:
1413:
1412:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1393:
1385:
1382:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1356:
1353:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1322:
1318:
1311:
1307:
1305:
1304:
1301:
1296:
1287:
1285:
1284:
1281:
1272:
1270:
1269:
1266:
1258:
1256:
1255:
1252:
1249:
1242:
1240:
1238:
1235:
1231:
1230:
1227:
1217:
1213:
1210:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1176:
1174:
1173:
1170:
1166:
1159:
1156:
1154:
1153:
1150:
1146:
1141:
1133:
1129:
1126:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1115:
1107:
1105:
1103:
1094:
1092:
1091:
1088:
1080:
1078:
1077:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1065:Raymond Moody
1058:
1057:
1056:
1053:
1047:
1045:
1044:
1041:
1033:
1029:
1026:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1016:
1011:
1005:
1004:
1001:
996:
994:
987:
985:
984:
981:
978:Thank you :)
976:
970:
968:
967:
964:
960:
952:
950:
949:
946:
942:
935:
932:
927:
923:
912:
910:
907:
905:
902:
901:
900:
897:
892:
890:
887:
885:
882:
881:
880:
877:
876:
875:
872:
869:
868:
867:
864:
863:
861:
858:
854:
850:
846:
845:
841:
833:
830:
826:
822:
821:
819:
818:
817:
814:
810:
806:
802:
801:
800:
795:
791:
789:
788:
785:
780:
776:
772:
766:
763:
759:
753:
749:
747:
743:
742:
734:
730:
727:
726:
725:
719:
715:
712:
708:
704:
703:
702:
701:
698:
694:
690:
686:
682:
674:
672:
671:
666:
662:
658:
653:
641:
639:
638:
635:
631:
626:
625:Hi Guettarda
620:
618:
617:
613:
604:
600:
597:
592:
591:
588:
585:
581:
580:
579:
578:
575:
566:
560:
556:
552:
548:
547:
542:
541:
540:
536:
532:
528:
527:
521:
520:
519:
518:
515:
511:
503:Teacher evals
502:
498:
495:
490:
489:
488:
487:
484:
481:
477:
469:
467:
466:
463:
460:. Thank you
459:
455:
447:
445:
439:
437:
436:
433:
429:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
400:
399:
398:
394:
390:
386:
378:
374:
371:
367:
363:
362:
361:
360:
357:
348:
344:
341:
337:
333:
332:
331:
330:
327:
324:
316:
306:
303:
299:
294:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
276:
273:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
258:
255:
251:
247:
243:
238:
234:
230:
227:
223:
218:
217:
216:
215:
212:
209:
204:
199:
198:
197:
196:
193:
189:
184:
180:
170:
167:
163:
162:
161:
160:
159:
158:
153:
150:
146:
142:
141:
140:
139:
136:
133:
129:
125:
120:
119:
118:
117:
114:
110:
107:which states
106:
98:
92:
84:
76:
70:
67:
62:
54:
44:
43:
38:
35:
32:
28:
27:
19:
1592:
1584:
1550:
1546:
1521:
1507:Greg Grahame
1482:
1469:
1443:
1434:
1426:
1422:
1414:
1404:Slrubenstein
1397:
1367:
1342:
1329:The article
1314:
1291:
1276:
1262:
1246:
1234:5 September
1224:
1221:
1199:Hagiographer
1186:
1180:
1162:
1137:
1111:
1104:1 Sept 2006
1098:
1084:
1062:
1054:
1051:
1037:
1015:Hagiographer
1006:
1000:Hagiographer
997:
991:
977:
974:
956:
938:
925:subcategory.
893:maybe others
798:
793:
792:Response to
767:
754:
750:
740:
737:
732:
728:
723:
678:
645:
627:
624:
608:
570:
567:Paul Weyrich
546:CrazyRussian
544:
526:CrazyRussian
524:
509:
506:
473:
451:
443:
425:
382:
365:
352:
335:
320:
297:
292:
249:
245:
241:
236:
232:
225:
221:
182:
177:
144:
127:
123:
108:
102:
40:
36:
1381:Herostratus
1352:Herostratus
1321:Herostratus
1102:User:Kazuba
1055:You wrote:
1040:Fred Bauder
957:Please see
1229:Farmbrough
1207:ROFLMAO.
1149:Homestarmy
574:Pravknight
105:WP:ARCHIVE
1589:Page Done
1573:Guettarda
1534:Guettarda
1498:Guettarda
1488:Guettarda
1372:Guettarda
1339:PZ Meyers
1310:PZ Meyers
1209:Guettarda
1195:stay cool
1025:Guettarda
746:cognition
596:Guettarda
584:Guettarda
514:Guettarda
494:Guettarda
370:Guettarda
340:Guettarda
317:Keep cool
302:Guettarda
254:Guettarda
192:Guettarda
166:Guettarda
132:Guettarda
128:certainly
42:wikibreak
37:Guettarda
1600:New Page
1596:rencin24
1454:Pproctor
1347:PZ Myers
1299:Bakatalk
1280:Sue Anne
1232:, 12:55
1125:Darwinek
1114:Darwinek
1073:Uncle Ed
1034:Workshop
857:Antilles
665:contribs
661:messages
422:Reminder
272:Paul Cyr
208:Paul Cyr
149:Paul Cyr
113:Paul Cyr
53:Archives
1295:Bakaman
1288:Request
1265:JoshuaZ
1251:Arbusto
1239:(GMT).
1187:content
1169:Arbusto
1087:JoshuaZ
980:Blowski
963:choster
784:Rednblu
779:heathen
634:Blowski
480:Karwynn
408:Joelito
389:Joelito
385:Sandbox
298:content
1259:Thanks
1218:Strike
1191:blocks
1010:WP:NPA
913:others
647:--Slgr
483:(talk)
356:Wclark
293:should
250:latest
235:". I
203:WP:NPA
124:trying
1479:Recat
1293:work.
1108:Hello
1081:Favor
652:ndson
612:Drini
555:email
535:email
366:edits
16:<
1547:must
1408:Talk
1400:Race
1394:race
1366:? "
1335:here
1237:2006
1226:Rich
1071:? --
945:Piet
931:Piet
809:here
807:and
805:here
731:that
729:But
711:Ezeu
697:Ezeu
695:. --
657:page
551:talk
531:talk
476:here
440:Hey!
432:Peta
412:talk
393:talk
66:El_C
1486:?
1484:Huh
1406:|
1364:Huh
1308:re
827:.--
741:why
691:or
683:to
510:too
406:.
336:and
237:had
226:and
183:may
1602:.
1278:--
1147:.
943:.
794:Or
782:--
748:.
663:-
659:-
572:--
414:)
395:)
354:--
667:)
655:(
650:@
553:/
533:/
410:(
391:(
326:@
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
