37:
Guy, I really don't see any great "rudeness" in my comments directly above. My "interest" in the subject is that I read the book around 25 years ago (along with many other science fiction books which I've read). I actually have a number of articles devoted to works of science fiction which I've
21:
Unfortunately, your edits reduced the article to a third of its previous length, and even just examining what you left behind, a number of your changes were really not improvements (such as using "Rip Van Winkle´s" as a finite verb form, etc.). --
43:
27:
39:
23:
47:
38:
read on my watchlist, even if they don't dominate my pattern of edits...
31:
8:
7:
14:
1:
48:00:54, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
32:01:33, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
64:
17:The Futurological Congress
55:
63:
62:
58:
57:
56:
54:
53:
52:
19:
12:
11:
5:
61:
59:
51:
50:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
60:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
34:
33:
29:
25:
16:
20:
40:AnonMoos
24:AnonMoos
44:talk
28:talk
46:)
30:)
42:(
26:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.