Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Hadrian89

Source 📝

538:
connservative in salford and it is meant to be derogatory, it is not a nickname widely used at all, and as you rightly say...it is not really notable in her life to be worth inserting.. I would take it out as derogatory but you are right .. that is not a good reason to remove it...but I would say that that was why it was inserted in the first place! Of course it is not really libelous, but if we are to create a really decent article then stuff like that is not needed even if 2 newspapers are reporting it in the present political climate... ta for looking at the cite/ broken..I did know that, and if I thought the piece was worth keeping I would have repaired them, I don't think it's worthy of a paragraph..do you? I was thinking of rip-in it out ? (
951:. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like 262:. Violating POINT is when arguing that no one notices vandalism to math articles, then making vandalistic edits to a number of obscure math articles and posting the (uncorrected) difs as proof. Your point (no one will notice! we should protect these articles!) is "proven" by your disruption of Knowledge (XXG). What the IP from the college was doing was simple vandalism, adding POV pushing essays to articles. 809: 154: 959:, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- 92:. The article is accurate overall, and so what I've been doing is simply adding references. Any good edition of Chaucer -- W.W. Skeat's for Oxford, or modern ones such as Fisher or Benson, includes a decent life of the poet, and could provide what's needed. Some minor details might have to be sourced in the 207:
Funny and clever. On the other hand, putting in edits you know to be unconstructive along with smaller good edits is also gaming the system. Question of priorities: it is more important that users not be redirected to Evil than there are small problems with internal links. Hadrian89 (talk) 16:08, 24
504:
you see how it works, so fast, I typed in to google ...chipmunk blears.. and it came up first...wikipedia.... It adds nothing to the article and imo is derogatory name calling and BLP guidlines are quite strict and are presently being tightened.. as far as I know..yes I took it out and I also took
123:
I'm pretty new editing Knowledge (XXG), so I suspect that there is a better way, but what I've done today is to perform a diff of two widely-separated versions. On Tim Duncan today, this usually includes several cases of vandalism, and some (not all) of them have been fixed. I then just click on
103:
What the article would more than this, if it's to aim for GA status, is a bit of a trim and re-organization. The excerpt from the Canterbury tales that's there seems to have been chosen more for its shocking content than as an illustration of Chaucer's language; a shorter passage, perhaps the
370:
However, there was support for his notion that "von Moltke" was behind the smuggling out of the last leaflet to Sweden and then to England. I added a footnote on this. Frau von Moltke said this in a speech she made to the White Rose Association after the war. This doesn't appear in the bio of
537:
It is meant to be about the hoarding of nuts as a ref to the expenses story.. which is already being given to much space in biographies, It is not widely known and is actually an attempt by those right wing papers to get people from salford to start calling her that and a push to insert a
650:
Obviously, it's an editorial commercial without any direct importance to the current Article improvement discussion. Therefore, its proper position in the TP is a chronological "Section" – because a commercial banner is no more important than any other topic for TP discussion about
104:
opening lines of the General Prologue, would to my mind be better. There's also not much of a sense of current Chaucer scholarship; some sort of outline should at least be there. I'll work towards adding that. Glad to see someone take an interest in the weedy garden! cheers,
440: 505:
out the edit b4 from londonplayer calling Derek draper ...dolly... and I will have a look at all his edits as they are probably all similar. Perhaps you would like to talk about that section that I commented on the cites not working on the talk page? (
704:
Just a head's up, I'm soliciting feedback on the VHEMT article in the talk section for the current revision, I've made a substantial revision in the effort to meet WP policy guidelines. Please take a look and let's discuss how to improve the article.
488:
The reallity of her situation is not important to me, helping to create a balanced article is, and the comment is irrelevent in her life story. I do not really want to discuss the chipmunk or flipper or whatever name calling with other editors.
866:
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to
955:. For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like 904:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
375:
but there's no reason to suspect that the old lady would lie about such a thing and Helmuth certainly had the connections to pull off such a plan. The book itself is available via Google books where you can download pieces of it.
306:, users are allowed to remove content from their own talk pages whether they are a registered editor or not. It is certainly tempting (and understandable) to want to restore warnings to potentially problematic users, but 769:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 581:. I've been working on the article some more; I think I will leave some comments of my own on the talk page, so if you'd like to take a look and see what still needs to be improved, that would be helpeful. 472:
The derogatory name calling in a couple of papers is not realy fitting in a biography of a living person and it is unworthy of us and wikipedia to propagate it. It would be better to remove it. regards
238:
Thanks for fixing. No, 'tweren't me. I only use wikipedia from a signed-on status. I start at wikipedia on my watch list, so I know right away if I've been signed off, by the 30-day thing or whatever.
310:
does not provide for this option. Be assured that admins who may be considering blocking a certain user will check their talk page histories, where all previous warnings are still visible. Cheers!
127:
Effectively, I'm undoing a whole slew of changes all at once...including all of the vandalism and all of the (incomplete) fixes, taking us back in time to whatever revision was good.
100:
is also a great source, though the idea that gives it its title is a speculative one. I would avoid John Gardner's bio, as it has some inaccuracies and is largely derivative anyway.
956: 944: 678:
Please respond to my User Talk Page within 72-hours. If you don't, I will assume you are in agreement with me and I'll revise your previous edit without further discussion.
404:
and was immediately reverted by ClueBot. ClueBot left a level 1 warning on his/her again recently blanked talk page. Surely that is a bit mild? Also, looking at the
821:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. 427:
Hi there! I'm afraid, that my English is not too perfect to understand what references you want me to add. Could you plz show me an example? Will appreciate any help!
833: 894: 966: 188:
Even if you want to revert the redirect, you can't revert my typo-fixes as well, because reverting all of an edit because part of it is unsatisfactory is
914: 952: 824:
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
922: 794: 272:
Thank you for the clarification, I should probably read all the way to the bottom of the page before I start quoting guidelines in future.
60:
page, the article has been removed several times by other editors before I did. If you think that it is notable enough to be enlisted on
848:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 683: 727: 948: 330: 295: 898: 890: 790: 184:
Yes, very funny BP. I'm sure we both know with whom the admins will side here. Hadrian89 (talk) 16:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
35: 359:...And of course BBC News regularly deletes such trivial comparisons from their articles. Ottre 17:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 578: 372: 918: 876: 781:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
960: 786: 299: 367:
Hi, yes I saw. It was largely illiterate and done by someone whose English is ... errr... let's say, less than good.
883: 817: 124:"undo" as though it was a single change, and Knowledge (XXG) gives me the right setup to automatically revert it. 605: 217:
I realise that, I have been involved too, but not as heavily as you. Lets just leave him and stop feeding him?
687: 109: 232: 197: 174: 73: 782: 158: 856: 636:
Undid revision 350056201 by 24.107.182.16 WikiProject banners are not subject to WP:TOPPOST; see WP:TPL
586: 345: 221: 829: 543: 527: 510: 494: 478: 263: 849: 758: 749: 577:
Hi Hadrian, I didn't know what you meant before when you said you left comments, and I just noticed
329:
Hey did you write at my user page? Oh did u edit my articles or requested to be deleted immediately
166: 157:
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Knowledge (XXG). Your edits appear to constitute
131: 601: 563: 454: 135: 778: 762: 408:, I see no main space edit from that IP address that was productive or added to the encyclopedia. 381: 315: 239: 105: 255: 248: 647:) of the Article Talk Page(TP)? Or, is it merely an editorial commercial for that WikiProject? 711: 193: 170: 69: 774: 766: 307: 303: 189: 582: 413: 341: 218: 89: 777:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 770: 405: 539: 523: 506: 490: 474: 911:
Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
559: 450: 274: 162: 41: 439: 739: 311: 707: 340:
Thanks! It's not quite GA (or FA) worthy yet, but I'm trying to get it there soon.
25:
Could I ask, is the criteria international significance or international interest?
38:
but all it said, rather vaguely, was that 'important' events should be reported.)
869: 845: 409: 28:
If the latter, then the Blagojevich impeachment has been widely reported abroad;
897:
justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See
926: 731: 662:
Wiki "Guideline" whereas WP:TPL is merely an unofficial "information" page (
146: 65: 843:
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to
600:
Thanks Hadrian! We were just going to add a period and got carried away.
735: 153: 972: 933: 798: 765:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
743: 716: 691: 609: 590: 567: 547: 531: 514: 498: 482: 417: 349: 319: 283: 266: 242: 226: 201: 178: 139: 113: 77: 643:
Does the WikiProject Death banner contribute to the primary purpose (
96:, which should be in most large research libraries. Terry Jones's 558:
I wonder if the American Realm is part of the British Empire....
387:
Hi Hadrian89, I noticed that you had issued a final warning (diff
130:
I suspect that there's a better way to do it, but I'm new here.
61: 57: 391:) to this anon user on 27 February 2009 after actions such as 807: 862:
to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
254:
POV pushing and unsourced commentary is not a violation of
804:
File permission problem with File:College Coat of Arms.jpg
615:
Dispute Resolution – Article Editor Requests Your Response
957:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon
945:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge
906: 401: 398: 396: 394: 392: 388: 259: 901:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
921:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 730:, a project dedicated to developing and improving 448:Thank you for reverting vandalism to my user pages 165:. If you would like to experiment, please use the 757:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 875:If you believe the media meets the criteria at 947:has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland 88:Hi Hadrian98, and thanks for your comments on 8: 891:Knowledge (XXG):File copyright tags#Fair use 400:. Today this user edited Jimbo's user page 953:Knowledge (XXG):The 1000 Challenge (Nordic) 627:Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (VHEMT) 434: 31:if the former, then your edit was correct. 917:. You may wish to read Knowledge (XXG)'s 56:Regarding the Blagojevich impeachment on 832:or another acceptable free license (see 119:re: How to revert several revisions back 64:, you would better post your opinion on 838:at the site of the original publication 828:make a note permitting reuse under the 444: 294:Hi. Recently you restored content to 7: 949:Knowledge (XXG):The 10,000 Challenge 899:Knowledge (XXG):File copyright tags 889:or one of the other tags listed at 726:You are invited to participate in 402:to add a claim about his sexuality 296:non believer evolution's talk page 14: 783:review the candidates' statements 36:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Years 877:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 634:19:28, 15 March 2010 – Hadrian89 438: 331:User talk:Non believer evolution 152: 389:including the editor's response 34:(I did check the guidelines at 939:Europe 10,000 Challenge invite 923:Media copyright questions page 789:. For the Election committee, 759:Arbitration Committee election 750:ArbCom elections are now open! 640:Are we at an impasse? (WP:DR) 16:Leave your comments below.... 1: 852:. If you take this step, add 818:File:College Coat of Arms.jpg 799:13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 658:In addition WP:TOPPOST is an 445: 373:Helmuth James Graf von Moltke 302:had removed themselves. Per 243:19:06, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 227:17:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 202:16:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 179:16:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 973:09:00, 6 November 2016 (UTC) 934:17:24, 3 December 2015 (UTC) 915:criteria for speedy deletion 666:an official Wiki Guideline). 461: 437: 140:20:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 114:13:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 78:06:36, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 785:and submit your choices on 988: 791:MediaWiki message delivery 717:01:12, 29 April 2010 (UTC) 692:21:44, 15 March 2010 (UTC) 610:17:21, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 350:20:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC) 320:21:56, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 744:15:35, 13 June 2010 (UTC) 619:Knowledge (XXG): Civility 591:19:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 284:06:22, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 267:19:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 51:49, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 573:William of Tyre comments 568:17:11, 6 June 2009 (UTC) 548:14:25, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 532:13:36, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 515:13:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 499:13:15, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 483:12:52, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 192:, which is forbidden. -- 418:04:01, 1 May 2009 (UTC) 962:Ser Amantio di Nicolao 812: 728:WikiProject Disability 300:non believer evolution 233:Talk:George Washington 815:Thanks for uploading 811: 763:Arbitration Committee 621:(WP:CIV) – (WP:FIVE) 258:as you seem to think 879:, use a tag such as 671:Wiki Love to you :-) 423:Talk:Tamlin (Тамлин) 406:contribution history 98:Who Murdered Chaucer 94:Chaucer LIfe Records 68:and get consensus.-- 767:arbitration process 653:article improvement 645:article improvement 208:February 2009 (UTC) 968:Lo dicono a Signa. 913:, as described on 813: 779:arbitration policy 734:related articles. 884:non-free fair use 465: 464: 190:gaming the system 979: 963: 931: 919:image use policy 888: 882: 861: 855: 810: 715: 442: 435: 224: 156: 145:Recent edits to 987: 986: 982: 981: 980: 978: 977: 976: 971: 961: 941: 927: 907:your upload log 886: 880: 859: 853: 808: 806: 787:the voting page 753: 724: 706: 702: 632:CONTESTED EDIT: 617: 598: 575: 556: 470: 459: 433: 425: 385: 365: 357: 338: 336:William of Tyre 327: 292: 290:A recent revert 264:KillerChihuahua 252: 236: 222: 215: 150: 121: 86: 22: 12: 11: 5: 985: 983: 965: 940: 937: 864: 863: 841: 805: 802: 756: 752: 747: 723: 720: 701: 698: 696: 680: 679: 677: 672: 668: 667: 639: 635: 633: 629: 628: 626: 624: 620: 616: 613: 602:Phoenixthebird 597: 594: 574: 571: 555: 554:American Realm 552: 469: 466: 463: 462: 460: 443: 432: 429: 424: 421: 384: 378: 364: 361: 356: 353: 337: 334: 326: 323: 291: 288: 287: 286: 251: 246: 235: 230: 214: 211: 210: 209: 186: 185: 169:. Thank you.-- 161:and have been 149: 143: 120: 117: 85: 82: 81: 80: 53: 52: 49: 39: 32: 29: 26: 21: 18: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 984: 975: 974: 970: 969: 964: 958: 954: 950: 946: 938: 936: 935: 932: 930: 925:. Thank you. 924: 920: 916: 912: 908: 902: 900: 896: 892: 885: 878: 873: 871: 870: 858: 851: 847: 846: 842: 839: 835: 831: 827: 826: 825: 822: 820: 819: 803: 801: 800: 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 776: 772: 768: 764: 760: 751: 748: 746: 745: 741: 737: 733: 729: 721: 719: 718: 713: 709: 699: 697: 694: 693: 689: 685: 684:24.107.182.16 681: 674: 669: 665: 661: 656: 654: 648: 646: 641: 637: 630: 622: 614: 612: 611: 607: 603: 595: 593: 592: 588: 584: 580: 572: 570: 569: 565: 561: 553: 551: 549: 545: 541: 535: 533: 529: 525: 521: 518: 516: 512: 508: 502: 500: 496: 492: 486: 484: 480: 476: 467: 458: 456: 452: 449: 441: 436: 430: 428: 422: 420: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 397: 395: 393: 390: 383: 379: 377: 374: 368: 362: 360: 354: 352: 351: 347: 343: 335: 333: 332: 324: 322: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 289: 285: 281: 277: 276: 271: 270: 269: 268: 265: 261: 257: 250: 247: 245: 244: 241: 240:Baseball Bugs 234: 231: 229: 228: 225: 220: 212: 206: 205: 204: 203: 199: 195: 191: 183: 182: 181: 180: 176: 172: 168: 164: 160: 155: 148: 144: 142: 141: 137: 133: 128: 125: 118: 116: 115: 111: 107: 106:Clevelander96 101: 99: 95: 91: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 54: 50: 47: 43: 40: 37: 33: 30: 27: 24: 23: 19: 17: 967: 942: 928: 910: 903: 893:, and add a 874: 868: 865: 857:OTRS pending 844: 837: 823: 816: 814: 754: 725: 703: 695: 682: 675: 670: 663: 659: 657: 652: 649: 644: 642: 638: 631: 623: 618: 599: 579:this subpage 576: 557: 536: 519: 503: 487: 471: 447: 446: 426: 386: 382:163.1.209.10 369: 366: 358: 339: 328: 293: 279: 273: 253: 237: 216: 194:Binarypascal 187: 171:Binarypascal 151: 129: 126: 122: 102: 97: 93: 87: 70:Belle Equipe 45: 15: 583:Adam Bishop 451:Maen. K. A. 342:Adam Bishop 219:Computerjoe 775:topic bans 732:disability 722:Invitation 540:Off2riorob 524:Off2riorob 507:Off2riorob 491:Off2riorob 475:Off2riorob 380:Anon user 363:White Rose 325:March 2009 895:rationale 834:this list 771:site bans 700:Feedback? 560:Dbrodbeck 431:Thank You 355:RE: 4chan 275:Hadrian89 213:Watch out 159:vandalism 147:Evolution 132:Russl5445 66:Talk:2009 42:Hadrian89 943:Hi. The 830:CC-BY-SA 673:(WP:EQ) 660:official 625:ARTICLE: 520:here... 312:Taroaldo 256:WP:POINT 249:WP:POINT 163:reverted 20:RE: 2009 708:Nuujinn 308:WP:TALK 304:WP:TALK 223:'s talk 167:sandbox 90:Chaucer 84:Chaucer 761:. The 468:Blears 410:EdChem 298:which 929:Kelly 596:Truth 850:here 840:; or 795:talk 740:talk 712:talk 688:talk 676:P.S. 655:. 606:talk 587:talk 564:talk 544:talk 528:talk 511:talk 495:talk 479:talk 455:talk 414:talk 346:talk 316:talk 280:talk 260:here 198:talk 175:talk 136:talk 110:talk 74:talk 62:2009 58:2009 48:) 17 46:talk 872:. 755:Hi, 736:Bib 664:not 522:] ( 909:. 887:}} 881:{{ 860:}} 854:{{ 836:) 797:) 773:, 742:) 705:-- 690:) 608:) 589:) 566:) 550:) 546:) 534:) 530:) 517:) 513:) 501:) 497:) 485:) 481:) 457:) 416:) 348:) 318:) 282:) 200:) 177:) 138:) 112:) 76:) 793:( 738:( 714:) 710:( 686:( 604:( 585:( 562:( 542:( 526:( 509:( 493:( 489:( 477:( 473:( 453:( 412:( 344:( 314:( 278:( 196:( 173:( 134:( 108:( 72:( 44:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Years
Hadrian89
talk
2009
2009
Talk:2009
Belle Equipe
talk
06:36, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Chaucer
Clevelander96
talk
13:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Russl5445
talk
20:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Evolution

vandalism
reverted
sandbox
Binarypascal
talk
16:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
gaming the system
Binarypascal
talk
16:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Computerjoe
's talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.