18:
103:
Appeal was sent to Arbcom and never answered, and proof of me violating any
Knowledge (XXG) policy was never proven either. Heresay from a few users that have issues themselves is not much evidence, in my opinion.
152:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
137:
58:
116:
53:
119:
and find your indef block to be completely justified. No need for hearsay when I can see the evidence with my own eyes. —
31:
25:
30:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
72:
125:
146:
120:
36:
127:
16:
134:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
154:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
115:
I can't speak for ArbCom, but I did review many of your
86:
82:
76:
67:
63:
49:
45:
41:
24:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
8:
7:
14:
1:
128:19:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
28:, who declined the request.
170:
138:guide to appealing blocks
21:
73:change block settings
20:
22:
161:
151:
145:
123:
92:
90:
79:
61:
59:deleted contribs
19:
169:
168:
164:
163:
162:
160:
159:
158:
157:
149:
143:
142:, then use the
131:
121:
106:
80:
70:
56:
39:
32:blocking policy
17:
12:
11:
5:
167:
165:
132:
113:
109:Decline reason
101:
97:Request reason
94:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
166:
156:
155:
148:
141:
139:
130:
129:
126:
124:
118:
112:
110:
105:
100:
98:
93:
88:
84:
78:
74:
69:
65:
60:
55:
51:
50:global blocks
47:
46:active blocks
43:
38:
33:
29:
27:
26:administrator
153:
135:
133:
114:
108:
107:
102:
96:
95:
68:creation log
35:
23:
117:past edits
64:filter log
136:read the
83:checkuser
42:block log
54:contribs
147:unblock
77:unblock
37:Hdayejr
122:Travis
140:first
87:log
34:).
150:}}
144:{{
111::
99::
81:•
75:•
71:•
66:•
62:•
57:•
52:•
48:•
44:•
91:)
89:)
85:(
40:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.