980:
certainly has its charms to say the least. Thing may start more slowly, but if in the end it achieves more consent then in long run it may turn out to be a faster matter to resolve things. I wonder if it was written by Dayaks directly, though, the
English is too native for that (eg "... binary oppositions that establish conceptual order?"). I suspect the cooperation of an anthropologist. Note also that they speak of 'colonialism, both past and present', which is a point rarely mentioned. The Dutch colonists have been replaced by Javanese ones. Anyway, I suppose we can establish that there has been cannibalism among Dayaks, though to a small extent. I've put it back in the article, but I'm not sure about the wording. I don't entirely follow the reasoning in the Dayakology article.
961:, which begins by describing "headhunting" and "cannibalism" (their quotation marks) as myths, but then goes on to explain why they do it! It's a long read, I'm afraid, but the facts are all there. I am tempted to laugh at what seems to be their hypocrisy ("We don't do it. Well, all right, we do, but the spirits make us do it", etc.), but then I have to be fair and admit that every culture goes to extreme lengths to justify its own crimes. They kill with machetes; we do it with bombs. Sweet dreams. --
248:". This includes the articles that you quoted, which are about electric motors. Electric motors are complicated beasts, and come in many different types, and it may well be that our articles on them could be expanded, but I'm probably not the person to do it. If there is any particular fact about magnetic fields that you think we have missed, please explain it to me and I will try to help. If you want to enlist the help of other Wikipedians,
583:
conditions should be classified as sources. Since a resistor only approximates an ideal current source for an infinitesmal range of conditions (at a specific load resistance and specific voltage it will give the correct current, but not if either varies) I wouldn't classify it as a source. But I'm willing to budge. -
91:
Thanks for your additions to the
Electrical Engineering article. The new caption for Edison is far more informative than the old one. I have removed Tesla from the article because he is not mentioned in the History section of the article. Please feel free to re-add him to the article preferably with
974:
For which 'we' now have the excuse of terrorism (no, really, it's the others who are the terrorists...). I wonder if in your remark you meant to refer to cannibalism as a crime. I came across a few discussions on the internet in which it seemed that people thought headhunting was bad but cannibalism
830:
article, in whivh you stated that the name means 'upstream'. Aren't you confused with 'dahulu' (which also means that)? Also, you state that they were cannibals, but I've read a fair bit about them and never heard of that. They were (and occasionally still are) headhunters. But there were (and still
685:
Your statement "Digital oscilloscopes usually acquire 50 milion samples per second" meant that most DSOs have exactly that sampling rate. It may not be what you meant, but it's what you said, and it's not true. A truer statement would be that "DSOs in common use have a wide range of maximum sampling
600:
A voltage source is a device that sources current into a load so that the voltage across its terminals is largely independent of the load impedance over a given range of load impedances. Voltage sources range in performance from 'ideal' (useful for calculations, but but nonexistent), through 'fairly
369:
by "Mr Static" says that an electrometer "can be run as a charge meter (high capacitance) or as a static voltmeter (low capacitance)". (By the way, Mr Static's web pages are a goldmine of information on electrostatics.) The general picture seems to be that an electrometer is any electrical measuring
291:
Thank you
Striver. You are entitled to your point of view - free speech and all that - but I'm not sure that it is fair to use Knowledge (XXG) to promote it. Someone is paying to store and serve all this data, and you and I are entitled to use these facilities only to further the aims of Knowledge
935:
By the way, if you search for "dayak cannibalism encyclopedia" you'll see that most online encyclopedias simply copy
Knowledge (XXG) (loads of them, often old copies - lazy bastards!), and considering we two seem to be the only ones discussing this I'd say we have a huge responsibility in educating
928:
nomadic and ignorant of agriculture. That stance doesn't need to have interfered with acuracy, but calling the Punan Dayaks doesn't give me too much confidence in the article. And what to think of 'houses made of bamboo'? For the rest I don't see too many inaccuracies. So I'm not sure, but I really
606:
A current source is a device that sources a largely constant current into a load regardless of the voltage across its output terminals over a given range of voltages. Current sources range from 'ideal' (useful for calculations, but nonexistent), through 'fairly good' (such as op-amp current sources
993:
Yes, I did imply that cannibalism and headhunting were crimes, but I hadn't thought very hard about it. I suspect that they're not crimes in the legal sense, at least not in secular states. It just seemed to me that it was a disrespectful way to treat the deceased. Many cultures like to bury their
979:
mind getting killed in the first place. Anyway, about the article. The way it is presented may look funny to us, but probably has to do with the way Dayaks talk things through. As in many parts of the world, first you establish a friendly atmosphere and then slowly you come down to business. Which
107:
My pleasure. I think the
History section is looking good now, although it still lacks a global POV. As for Tesla, I don't really care whether his picture is there or not. I think your approach is right - to have pictures of those mentioned in the text, and no others. As I have removed his picture
582:
The approximation to an ideal source is very poor, and it seems that by that logic, anything could be considered a voltage source through a
Thevenin conversion. I would argue that only things that make a reasonable (whatever that means) approximation to an ideal source over a certain range of
560:
It depends on whether you're talking about an ideal source or a practical approximation to one, I suppose. The articles should say that in circuit theory the terms "voltage source" and "current source" have an implied "ideal" before them, whereas in circuit design they often refer to very poor
457:
I can see why charge measurement is difficult. However, the
Millikan oil drop experiment is an example of a non-contact method for measuring free-floating charged objects (but only if you know their mass). Arguing from symmetry, it ought to be possible to measure a fixed object by making your
956:
I agree with you about the 1911 encyclopedia. Statements like "The Dyak is decidedly intelligent..." don't give you much confidence, but all research of that era was probably in the same style. I wonder if you have access to any old Dutch-language works on the subject? The
Dayakology website
479:
True, I'm not saying it's not possible to measure the charge on an object. I'm just saying that a device that changes measurement as you move it closer to or farther away from an object is definitely not measuring charge, where charge = excess charge on a single object. It would have to be
1459:
as synonymous with electric charge. It seems to me that: "Electricity is a general term applied to phenomena involving a fundamental property of matter called an electric charge." is a good definition. I don't think electric power is a phenomenon but rather a technological application of
686:
rates, from a few tens of megasamples per second for cheap models, through mid-range models at around 50 to 100 megasamples per second, to one or two gigasamples per second for the most expensive." If you want to go into more detail than that, it would perhaps be better to add it to the
929:
want to know this. I've
Googled the combination of the two terms ("dayak cannibalism") and there are quite a few writings about this, a lot of hogwash, and some quoting each other, but some of it seems fairly reliable. But nothing conclusive. The most reliable source I found is
1439:
Use of the revert button is not an accusation of vandalism. The edit in question was a joke that did not belong in the article, so I removed it. Perhaps you mean that I should have explained my reason in the edit summary, in which case I admit to being lazy on that occasion.
1016:
Yes, I was thinking that too. Just one more thing to round this off here. I was only talking about cannibalism. The way they headhunt is something different because that's the way they kill their enemy (at least, I've always assumed that). Which of course is not ok.
370:
instrument that works on electrostatic rather than electrodynamic principles. E-field meters are a special case: although they are fundamentally electrometers, they are so specialised that they tend to have other names, including my favourite, the "E-field mill".
1470:
This is difficult. My definition errs on the side of strictness, while IMO yours is so broad that it fails to define the term. I could conclude from your version that chemistry is electricity, since all chemical reactions "involve" electric charge, yet
565:
represent the ideal forms, whereas electronic components are always non-ideal (obviously). I notice that there has been some heavy editing going on recently on those articles, so I'll have a quick scan of them to check that they haven't gone all weird.
899:
OK, I'll keep looking for evidence (or maybe I should have a rest from this morbid search and write about flowers and bunny rabbits instead!). However, it's easy to find an old reference to cannibalism - it's mentioned in a 1911 encyclopedia
505:. Later models measured the force or torque produced by electric fields, gave a numerical output, and were called absolute electrometers. Modern absolute electrometers are electronic, using first vacuum tubes and then op-amps as the detectors.
395:
Yes, I have seen all three definitions online. It seems that a charge measurement would be something like "this metal sphere has x coulombs of excess negative charge", though, and wouldn't be something you could measure by holding an object
893:
I already removed the cannibalism bit (along with several other edits), but if you can find good sources just put it back. But unless you (or I) can find a source that also mentions it for times before transmigrasi, I wouldn't call it
594:
Having read the talk pages for those articles, I see what all the fuss is about. Like you, I'm not too happy with the conflation of near-ideal sources with dodgy resistor networks, but the argument seems to be one of degree. How about
757:
is currently working his way through the list of official warnings, which Sidam is ignoring. After that, I think we'll have to do a survey of users for and against a ban. I doubt that anyone will be against, but you never know.
1046:
Yes, I can see why you find it inconvenient. Perhaps our article is aimed too much at specialists. I will try adding a comment at the top of the page for the benefit of people who are expecting the mains power article.
601:
good' (such as voltage regulators, monopolar generators and lead-acid batteries) down to 'crap' (such as voltage dividers). Whether or not a particular device can be considered a voltage source depends on the application.
1475:
is not mentioned in the list of phenomena in the article. I suspect that we can define the term only by listing the specific phenomena that it covers. I shall tweak the definition in your direction, so see what you
480:
something that you contact to an object and it measures the excess charge on the whole object. I'm not even sure how that would work on an insulator. So it's measuring voltage or electric field or something. -
1429:. You have used the revert button, which I feel, is not justified in this case as he was not committing vandalism. I just wanted to bring this to your attention as it may have been an oversight on your part. --
1405:
It is literal. The current goes back to the high-voltage transformer, which may be hundreds of km away, through the earth. I'll have a look at the article you mentioned to see if I can make any improvement.
1150:
That's an interesting suggestion. I haven't worked on a
Wikiproject yet, so I'm not sure what it would entail, but I just went off and read some of the Wikiproject:Physics stuff. Here are my first thoughts:
994:
own dead in one piece. The headhunter or cannibal might claim that, in his culture, the practice is a mark of respect for the dead warrior, but this isn't fair if the dead man was from a different culture.
381:
article that "electrometer also known as an electroscope " is not quite true, since electrometers are accurate quantitive devices and electroscopes are either roughly quantitative or merely indicative.
874:
that mentions "evidence of cannibalism", but I'll try to find something less equivocal. I remember reading that the Dayak practice was to cut off the head, and remove and eat the heart (here's another
1213:. If this gets other people interested, then the project might go forward. If people are indifferent then the project will stall, which would be better than going ahead without enough support. --
108:
once, and added it once, and been reverted both times, I feel it's time for me to sit back and let others argue it out. I will of course edit other bits of the article if I see the need. --
957:
obviously emphasises their own good side, but to my surprise does actually admit the horrors we are talking about. I Googled for "headhunters OR headhunting site:dayakology.com" and found
292:(XXG), not to pursue our own political ends, whether they be justified or not. Setting up a "guild" based on a prejudged view of world events seems to me to be contrary to the idea of
620:
In summary, there is a continuum from 'ideal' to 'crap', rather than a threshold below which a device is not a voltage/current source. Do you think this view might please everybody? --
615:) down to 'crap' (such as large resistors connected to constant high-voltage sources). Whether or not a particular device can be considered a current source depends on the application.
1181:
I'm not sure yet whether the existence of a Wikiproject makes a subject more or less accessible to newbies. I wouldn't like to do anything that creates a barrier to new contributors.
1337:
I'm new to Wiki, and will start a separate Cooling page as soon as I learn how! In the meantime, there I've been adding Cooling material to Cliffe, where it already had a mention.
713:, which should be sufficient to deal with that particular article. I'm not particularly familiar with how RfC's work, but in principle I am willing to countersign--it seems like
236:
Hi. I am aware of the arguments that have taken place on Knowledge (XXG) on this subject, but there is nothing to say about rotating magnetic fields that isn't covered under "
1034:
The title of this page is very missleading and really does not deal with what I think the average person would expect when he searches for transmission line. I would expect
1326:
Hoo Peninsula is looking great. In fact, a lot of the material is more detailed for this overview than for the individual villages, particularly Cooling. How would you and
502:
with an extremely high input impedance. Old electrometers produced a visible displacement of a moving part, and were called electroscopes or arbitrary electrometers
1545:
1390:
439:, either. We should have a group of "templates" for sending out in emails to different categories of people with good arguments persuading them to contribute. -
669:) I admit there are faster and slower ones, and few well funded labs far mor faster rigs, but ~50M is what you buy in a shop. My roommate's one can do 30 MHz. --
1364:
re-writing/referencing Cooling (off WP), so I'll plug that in from scratch when I'm (eventually) done. Everything else, Wiki WYSIWYG... Have a lovely Xmas :-)
273:
1481:
I agree with your second point. I remember thinking exactly that as I was editing the article, but then the devil made me press the "save" button. --
1227:
1210:
1175:
Some effort will be necessary to adminster the project. Judging by the large number of contributors to this subject, this may not be a problem.
529:
I think I've now got a clear enough understanding to be able to start editing articles, but if you want to go first, don't let me stop you! --
1350:
I like your suggestion. Anyway, I'm not a major contributor to that article, so don't worry about consulting me in future. Best wishes. --
999:
Anyway, I'm glad we have reached a consensus (for now) on the article. If we need to discuss the subject any further, shall we do so on the
710:
1534:
Wouldn't the flag on the selected anniversaries for December 31 look a little better if you added a border around it? {{border}} Thanks. —
1137:
1126:
1038:. I had to do a lot of hunting to find it. Do you think some editing, renaming, or something should be done. This is out of my pay grade.
784:
That's not our problem. If he wants to contribute to the English-language Knowledge (XXG), he will have to defend himself in English. --
420:
Yes, I thought about contacting him, but then I thought, he probably doesn't write this stuff for nothing. I hope you can prove me wrong.
458:
measuring instrument float. There are probably lots of kinds of "charge measurement" that all require different measuring techniques. --
1226:
The project was already started by another user, though I think we can consider it a prototype. You should bring up these concerns on
514:
If you can measure charge, then you can integrate it w.r.t. time to get current. This is how some current-measuring electrometers work
1266:
878:
that mentions removal of the heart). The main reference I used to write the article was a blood-curdling piece about the Dayaks in
845:
says it means "inland", which, in the context of a small island, I suppose is synonymous with "upstream". Perhaps it means both.
1178:
Contributors (including you and me) might get distracted by the bureaucratic work and spend less time actually writing articles.
975:
was really atrocious. I've never really understood this. I myself couldn't care less if people ate me after they kill me, but I
916:
Well it does. But I've got my doubts about this source. But that has partly to do with a paternalising stance. Like calling the
727:
Thanks. I'll wait to see what happens on WikiProject Physics before I go any further. I don't know how effective RfCs are. --
561:
approximations of those ideals. The voltage source symbol (a circle) and the current source symbol (two overlapping circles)
1165:
The statement of goals at the beginning of the Wikiproject would help us to decide on, and then stick to, a common purpose.
1398:
362:
75:
There were quite a lot of them, so I didn't have time to finish. I'm sure I'll get through them all sooner or later. --
1035:
659:
208:
that should have an article covering it and some seem to not see it as an important concept by itself. The articles "
753:
I know. I'll support a ban, and block him myself, but only after all the necessary procedures have been followed.
142:
Thanks. There was a nice, obvious, inviting gap waiting to be filled, so I couldn't resist. I don't even care if it
1426:
185:
Ok. I wasn't completely sure, but thought they were right originally. Gradients vs differences or something... -
706:
771:
Someone should check if He actually understands English tho'. If not we may need to issue warnings in Russian--
518:
1133:
1284:
608:
34:
1159:
It will give us somewhere to discuss generalities without cluttering the talk pages of node-level articles.
270:
I wonder if this guild is anything that you may benefit from, and in that case, feel invited to sign in :)
157:
511:. This can only measure the charge dumped on to the electrometer, not the charge on some distant object.
225:
46:
884:
magazine, which I will try to find for you. I can assure you that I wasn't thinking of New Guinea. --
690:
article. I know that I'm picky, but then so are all other Wikipedians. Please don't be put off :-) --
1555:
1538:
958:
930:
436:
405:
Yes, I've read Mr. Static's pages a lot lately (and asked him if he'd like to contribute!) :-) -
249:
509:
252:
is probably the best place to ask. There are some seriously clever people working on that page. --
128:
I liked your quick response to the anon's request to include some information on the mechanics of
1276:
1117:
1088:
772:
741:
675:
366:
312:
296:. I would recommend setting up your own website. Good luck in your investigations. Regards, --
54:
1315:
entirely dedicated to collecting information about Engineering. I invite you to join this wiki.
1162:
It might help to enforce consistency of facts and presentation within the electronics articles.
231:(PS., is there any other place I can goto to request that the topic be explained? Thanks again)
795:
343:
27:
1327:
1039:
875:
871:
848:
Small island? It's the third biggest island in the world! Do I detect an irony I don't get?
1505:
Re your To-do list, you may have noticed that I added a "power triangle" vector diagram to
1393:
for someone fairly ignorant of electrical engineering. How literal is that term? (Although
215:
1430:
939:
And by another way, flowers have a habit of getting decapitated too, and even dried (like
901:
802:
129:
119:
17:
1389:
I'd appreciate if you could make a dumbed-down explanation of the "earth return" part of
1184:
Have you thought about where to draw the boundaries of the subject? As I understand it,
740:
Im getting rather tired of Sidam now, so I think something should be done pretty soon!--
92:
a mention in the History section. Also feel free to edit any other part of the article.
1535:
1510:
1506:
1492:
1461:
1394:
1243:
I'm happy with what has been done on the project so far. Perhaps I'll see you there. --
1231:
1141:
1113:
634:
584:
553:
549:
545:
503:
481:
440:
406:
347:
241:
237:
186:
165:
133:
42:
1209:
I suggest we could start by writing a provisional intro page based on the template in
842:
521:
1331:
1330:(who seems to be a major contributor) feel if I pulled some of the detail out of the
940:
670:
68:
1087:
Sorry about that, Heron. I was just trying to tidy up the page. Anyway its OK now.--
508:
To measure charge, you can use an electrometer to measure voltage and then use Q=CV
1018:
981:
944:
849:
832:
687:
645:
377:
336:
282:
515:
315:
1456:
1422:
1365:
1341:
1066:
754:
718:
322:
98:
50:
1401:
my question, I figure that seeing a differently phrased answer couldn't hurt.)
1552:
1520:
1482:
1441:
1407:
1375:
1351:
1308:
1244:
1214:
1098:
1073:
1048:
1004:
1000:
962:
904:
885:
860:
812:
785:
759:
728:
714:
691:
649:
621:
612:
567:
530:
459:
383:
326:
297:
253:
173:
147:
109:
76:
1204:. Did you intend the project to cover both the physics and the engineering?
311:
Yes , I think this could be moved to another page. Would you care to oblige??
224:
both cover the concerned concept that should be listed in wikipedia. Thanks,
1472:
499:
1523:
1513:
1495:
1485:
1464:
1444:
1433:
1410:
1378:
1368:
1354:
1344:
1247:
1234:
1217:
1144:
1120:
1101:
1091:
1076:
1051:
1021:
1007:
984:
965:
947:
932:. But they seem too much bent on defending the Dayak to promote the island.
907:
888:
863:
852:
835:
815:
805:
788:
775:
762:
744:
731:
721:
694:
679:
652:
624:
570:
533:
462:
386:
329:
300:
285:
256:
228:
176:
150:
136:
112:
101:
57:
1360:
Hi, thanks for doing the moves I've only been talking about... In fact, I
1097:
No problem. By the way, I have raised another issue on your Talk page. --
1062:'"Perhaps they said 'There's a titmouse. Oh look, there's another one.'"'
358:
209:
33:
We were discussing on the industrial application of Synchronous motors as
903:(paragraph 5). I think that predates transmigrasi by several decades. --
1334:
page and into those for the separate villages (with a X-ref of course)?
1265:
666:
What is untrue about digital osciloscopes being able to take 50 MS/s? (
67:
please use what links here to check for double redirects and fix them.
880:
245:
172:
Sorry. I misunderstood the article. I have put them all back now. --
917:
827:
274:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Conspiracy: The World Conspiracy Guild
1312:
1270:
1254:
293:
831:
are) cannibals in New Guinea. Maybe that caused the confusion?
544:
What's your opinion on a voltage divider being classified as a
1292:
1072:
I use the same technique for the plural of mongoose. :^) --
1519:
Well done! I like To-Do lists that complete themselves. --
1421:
Hi, this is with reference to your revert of an edit by
644:
OK. I'm watching both those articles. The same goes for
943:). And what about bunny rabbits around Christmas? :) .
667:
579:
Yeah. I should have linked to the talk pages, I guess.
220:
201:
633:
Mostly agree. We should move this talk over there. -
49:
does not throw light on many aspects especially, the
717:
has been a continuous problem for some time now. --
1546:Knowledge (XXG):Selected_anniversaries/December_31
495:OK. Here's a summary of what I've learned so far.
375:By the way, the statement at the beginning of the
1112:An interesting discussion has just broken out on
959:"The Role of Adat in the Dayak and Madurese War"
435:Yeah, it's doubtful. I'm probably not the best
826:It looks like you wrote the first stub for the
1455:I don't believe that is appropriate to define
662:and sampling frequency of digital oscilloscope
346:measure charge, electric field, or voltage? -
200:Heron, could you see if you could look at the
1374:Glad you like it. Best wishes to you, too! --
365:is a basic instrument that reads only volts.
8:
212:" and "Introduction to Generators and Motors
1211:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject best practices
1491:Thank you. I like the new definition. --
357:says either voltage or charge, although
811:Thanks. I'll add it to my watchlist. --
548:, and a resistor being classified as a
1529:
1116:. Take a look, you may be interested--
859:No, you detect my ignorance. Sorry. --
355:The Penguin Dictionary of Electronics
7:
1132:I am wondering if we should start a
705:I just posted the difficulties with
1269:Thank you for your contribution at
801:Nice copyediting on this article!
711:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Physics
24:
321:I would gladly have done so, but
1340:All advice gratefully received!
1264:
84:Tesla and Electrical Engineering
1551:OK, as it's you. I tried it. --
1259:
1042:22:20, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
1530:Today's selected anniversaries
1248:17:00, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
1235:13:40, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
1218:19:31, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
1145:00:22, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
1121:23:21, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
1102:19:37, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
1092:19:17, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
1077:20:59, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
789:14:01, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
776:13:31, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
763:12:02, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
745:22:46, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
1:
1539:23:02, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
1524:21:22, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
1514:21:03, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
1496:21:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
1486:20:32, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
1465:18:37, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
1460:electromagnetic phenomona. --
1445:21:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
1434:14:24, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
1427:List of misleading food names
1411:21:35, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
1379:18:39, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
1369:17:56, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
1052:17:09, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
517:. It's called an integrating
361:measures current and charge.
1355:13:23, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
1345:23:34, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
556:14:54, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
350:16:12, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
58:02:38, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
1556:11:47, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
1293:Feel free to send me e-mail
1036:Electric power transmission
1022:18:34, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
1008:12:19, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
985:08:22, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
966:19:54, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
948:18:57, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
908:13:24, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
889:11:54, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
864:13:24, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
853:12:07, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
841:On the origin of the name,
836:09:55, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
816:17:20, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
806:16:08, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
732:19:44, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
722:19:15, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
695:19:40, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
680:21:22, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
660:Analog-to-digital converter
637:03:01, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
587:20:51, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
540:current and voltage sources
484:14:52, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
409:22:25, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
168:16:42, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
1571:
653:08:34, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
625:21:07, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
571:20:15, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
534:19:46, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
463:14:12, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
387:18:53, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
330:10:42, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
316:23:54, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
189:20:31, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
146:someone's homework. :-) --
1140:. What do you think? —
707:electromagnetic induction
301:09:27, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
286:01:35, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
257:20:32, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
229:19:26, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
177:18:50, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
151:16:54, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
137:23:32, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
113:16:11, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
102:13:41, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
609:Van de Graaff generators
519:transimpedance amplifier
210:Rotating magnetic fields
71:6 July 2005 22:41 (UTC)
1127:WikiProject Electronics
924:form of Dayaks who are
325:has beaten me to it. --
307:Heat Sensistive 'relay'
216:rotating magnetic field
202:rotating magnetic field
196:Rotating Magnetic Field
79:7 July 2005 18:05 (UTC)
35:power factor correctors
1279:- P R A D E E P Somani
1198:electrical engineering
1194:electronic engineering
1108:Interesting discussion
158:Peltier-Seebeck effect
39:Synchronous capacitors
1200:which is a branch of
498:An electrometer is a
221:Integrated Publishing
1304:New Engineering Wiki
1275:Please keep it up!!!
306:
63:when you move a page
278:Have a good day :)
250:Talk:magnetic field
163:Why nablas --: -->
47:synchronous motors
28:Synchronous motors
1301:
1300:
1030:Transmission line
796:Scientific method
678:
344:Talk:Electrometer
206:engineering topic
1562:
1309:Engineering Wiki
1287:
1280:
1268:
1260:
674:
1570:
1569:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1532:
1503:
1453:
1419:
1387:
1321:
1306:
1285:
1278:
1258:
1196:is a branch of
1188:is a branch of
1130:
1110:
1085:
1060:
1032:
936:the world! :) .
824:
799:
703:
664:
542:
359:this instrument
340:
309:
265:
198:
161:
123:
120:Crane (machine)
86:
65:
31:
22:
21:
20:
18:User talk:Heron
12:
11:
5:
1568:
1566:
1549:
1548:
1531:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1507:Electric power
1502:
1499:
1489:
1488:
1478:
1477:
1452:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1418:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1386:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1358:
1357:
1320:
1317:
1305:
1302:
1299:
1298:
1290:
1274:
1257:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1221:
1220:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1182:
1179:
1176:
1172:
1171:
1167:
1166:
1163:
1160:
1156:
1155:
1129:
1124:
1114:Talk:Capacitor
1109:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1084:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1059:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1031:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1011:
1010:
996:
995:
990:
989:
988:
987:
969:
968:
953:
952:
951:
950:
941:shrunken heads
937:
933:
920:the fifth and
911:
910:
897:
896:
895:
867:
866:
857:
856:
855:
823:
820:
819:
818:
798:
793:
792:
791:
781:
780:
779:
778:
766:
765:
750:
749:
748:
747:
735:
734:
702:
699:
698:
697:
663:
657:
656:
655:
641:
640:
639:
638:
628:
627:
617:
616:
603:
602:
597:
596:
591:
590:
589:
588:
580:
574:
573:
550:current source
546:voltage source
541:
538:
537:
536:
527:
526:
525:
522:(circuit here)
512:
506:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
413:
412:
411:
410:
400:
399:
398:
397:
390:
389:
372:
371:
339:
334:
333:
332:
308:
305:
304:
303:
264:
261:
260:
259:
242:electric motor
238:magnetic field
197:
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
180:
179:
160:
155:
154:
153:
122:
117:
116:
115:
85:
82:
81:
80:
64:
61:
37:and mainly as
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1567:
1558:
1557:
1554:
1547:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1537:
1525:
1522:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1512:
1508:
1500:
1498:
1497:
1494:
1487:
1484:
1480:
1479:
1474:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1463:
1458:
1450:
1446:
1443:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1416:
1412:
1409:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1384:
1380:
1377:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1367:
1363:
1356:
1353:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1343:
1338:
1335:
1333:
1332:Hoo Peninsula
1329:
1324:
1319:Hoo Peninsula
1318:
1316:
1314:
1310:
1303:
1297:
1295:
1294:
1288:
1282:
1281:
1272:
1267:
1262:
1261:
1256:
1253:
1249:
1246:
1242:
1241:
1236:
1233:
1229:
1228:the talk page
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1219:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1180:
1177:
1174:
1173:
1169:
1168:
1164:
1161:
1158:
1157:
1153:
1152:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1128:
1125:
1123:
1122:
1119:
1118:Light current
1115:
1107:
1103:
1100:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1090:
1089:Light current
1082:
1078:
1075:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1065:Brilliant. --
1063:
1057:
1053:
1050:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1041:
1037:
1029:
1023:
1020:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1009:
1006:
1002:
998:
997:
992:
991:
986:
983:
978:
973:
972:
971:
970:
967:
964:
960:
955:
954:
949:
946:
942:
938:
934:
931:
927:
923:
919:
915:
914:
913:
912:
909:
906:
902:
898:
894:'resurgence'.
892:
891:
890:
887:
883:
882:
877:
873:
869:
868:
865:
862:
858:
854:
851:
847:
846:
844:
840:
839:
838:
837:
834:
829:
821:
817:
814:
810:
809:
808:
807:
804:
797:
794:
790:
787:
783:
782:
777:
774:
773:Light current
770:
769:
768:
767:
764:
761:
756:
752:
751:
746:
743:
742:Light current
739:
738:
737:
736:
733:
730:
726:
725:
724:
723:
720:
716:
712:
708:
700:
696:
693:
689:
684:
683:
682:
681:
677:
672:
668:
661:
658:
654:
651:
647:
643:
642:
636:
632:
631:
630:
629:
626:
623:
619:
618:
614:
610:
605:
604:
599:
598:
593:
592:
586:
581:
578:
577:
576:
575:
572:
569:
564:
563:by definition
559:
558:
557:
555:
551:
547:
539:
535:
532:
528:
523:
520:
516:
513:
510:
507:
504:
501:
497:
496:
494:
493:
483:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
464:
461:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
442:
438:
437:wikivangelist
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
408:
404:
403:
402:
401:
394:
393:
392:
391:
388:
385:
380:
379:
374:
373:
368:
364:
360:
356:
353:
352:
351:
349:
345:
338:
335:
331:
328:
324:
320:
319:
318:
317:
314:
313:Light current
302:
299:
295:
290:
289:
288:
287:
284:
279:
276:
275:
271:
268:
262:
258:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
234:
233:
232:
230:
227:
226:165.201.42.84
222:
219:
217:
211:
207:
203:
195:
188:
184:
183:
182:
181:
178:
175:
171:
170:
169:
167:
159:
156:
152:
149:
145:
141:
140:
139:
138:
135:
131:
126:
121:
118:
114:
111:
106:
105:
104:
103:
100:
96:
93:
89:
83:
78:
74:
73:
72:
70:
62:
60:
59:
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
36:
29:
26:
19:
1550:
1533:
1504:
1501:Power Factor
1490:
1454:
1420:
1388:
1361:
1359:
1339:
1336:
1325:
1322:
1307:
1291:
1277:
1263:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1131:
1111:
1086:
1064:
1061:
1033:
976:
925:
921:
879:
843:this article
825:
800:
704:
688:oscilloscope
665:
646:electrometer
562:
543:
378:electrometer
376:
367:This article
354:
341:
337:electrometer
310:
280:
277:
272:
269:
266:
223:
213:
205:
199:
162:
143:
127:
124:
97:
94:
90:
87:
66:
45:. Your page
38:
32:
1457:electricity
1451:Electricity
1423:User:Jengod
1397:is already
1202:engineering
1186:electronics
1138:Electronics
1134:WikiProject
755:User:SCZenz
613:photodiodes
263:WikiProject
53:. Thanks --
51:mathematics
1431:Gurubrahma
1192:, whereas
1001:Talk:Dayak
876:BBC report
872:BBC report
803:Mamawrites
715:User:Sidam
204:? It's an
164:deltas? -
125:Hi Heron,
88:Hi Heron,
55:Davy Jones
1511:C J Cowie
1493:C J Cowie
1473:chemistry
1462:C J Cowie
1399:answering
1395:C J Cowie
1323:Hi Heron
1232:Omegatron
1142:Omegatron
870:Here's a
635:Omegatron
585:Omegatron
554:Omegatron
500:voltmeter
482:Omegatron
441:Omegatron
407:Omegatron
348:Omegatron
187:Omegatron
166:Omegatron
134:Solipsist
41:. Have a
1003:page? --
671:Alvin-cs
342:Does an
95:Thanks,
69:Plugwash
1190:physics
1170:Contras
1058:Titmice
1019:DirkvdM
982:DirkvdM
945:DirkvdM
850:DirkvdM
833:DirkvdM
396:nearby.
283:Striver
244:" and "
1544:Link:
1476:think.
1417:Revert
1366:JackyR
1342:JackyR
1328:Faedra
1067:Nathew
922:lowest
881:Granta
719:SCZenz
323:Meggar
246:dynamo
130:cranes
99:Cedars
1553:Heron
1521:Heron
1483:Heron
1442:Heron
1408:Heron
1376:Heron
1352:Heron
1311:is a
1245:Heron
1230:. —
1215:Heron
1099:Heron
1083:Sorry
1074:Heron
1049:Heron
1005:Heron
977:would
963:Heron
926:still
918:Punan
905:Heron
886:Heron
861:Heron
828:Dayak
822:Dayak
813:Heron
786:Heron
760:Heron
729:Heron
701:Sidam
692:Heron
650:Heron
622:Heron
595:this:
568:Heron
531:Heron
460:Heron
384:Heron
327:Heron
298:Heron
267:Hi!
254:Heron
218:, at
174:Heron
148:Heron
132:. --
110:Heron
77:Heron
16:<
1536:Alex
1509:. --
1391:SWER
1385:SWER
1313:wiki
1286:talk
1271:Pune
1255:Pune
1154:Pros
1136:for
1040:Phil
676:Talk
648:. --
611:and
607:and
552:? -
363:Here
294:NPOV
240:", "
43:look
1425:on
709:on
214:";
144:was
1440:--
1406:--
1362:am
1296:.
1273:.
1047:--
758:--
673:|
566:--
382:--
281:--
1289:)
1283:(
524:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.