245:
72:
317:(SPAs) who were causing problems on the Barrett Watten page were blocked recently. Your account is also an SPA and today you seemed to accuse another editor of COI, even though she appears entirely uninvolved. I think it's only fair that Watten should be represented on the talk page, but you should make clear that that's what you're doing, if indeed that is what you're doing. Please read our
127:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
86:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the
19:
I'm reaching out to seek consensus on the
Barrett Watten page. I am trying to avoid violating the NPOV standards, but am interested in adding factual and relevant information to this page. Is there any way you would be interested in finding such a consensus?
261:
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
148:
I redacted your request on the Talk page. Please note that defamatory content is just as much a violation of BLP when it appears on a Talk page, even when reproduced in a request to remove it, as it is when it appears in an article.
290:
175:
174:
192:! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge and get help from experienced editors like
293:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
95:
151:
Please do not reproduce defamatory content you propose to remove on a Talk page, as it defeats the purpose of removing it from the article.
87:
325:, which explains how to disclose a COI. If it applies to you, you can simply leave a note on your user page. Many thanks,
103:
107:
271:
25:
115:
222:
37:
21:
120:
99:
98:
for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
83:
322:
154:
134:
48:
91:
206:
199:
189:
286:
251:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
42:
It's too late for you to start seeking consensus. You should now respond to the report at
326:
298:
282:
275:
267:
263:
124:
79:
43:
244:
318:
314:
132:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
94:
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
331:
303:
143:
71:
57:
29:
257:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
194:
123:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
217:
70:
114:
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
106:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
166:Historyofpoetry, you are invited to the Teahouse!
90:to work toward making a version that represents
130:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule
8:
281:For additional information, please see the
266:is in effect. Any administrator may impose
82:shows that you are currently engaged in an
278:, when making edits related to the topic.
186:! Thanks for contributing to Knowledge.
270:on editors who do not strictly follow
7:
283:guidance on discretionary sanctions
14:
243:
173:
119:—especially if you violate the
96:the bold, revert, discuss cycle
78:Your recent editing history at
319:conflict of interest guideline
1:
332:00:23, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
313:Hi Historyofpoetry, several
204:
44:the edit warring noticeboard
321:, particularly the section
347:
276:page-specific restrictions
212:We hope to see you there!
171:
304:23:04, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
228:16:07, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
144:15:50, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
58:16:14, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
30:15:56, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
315:single-purpose accounts
287:Arbitration Committee's
264:discretionary sanctions
238:Discretionary sanctions
75:
74:
309:Conflict of interest
272:Knowledge's policies
116:blocked from editing
207:Visit the Teahouse
104:dispute resolution
76:
330:
302:
235:
234:
229:
225:
221:on behalf of the
121:three-revert rule
338:
329:
301:
247:
227:
220:
214:
209:
197:
188:Be our guest at
177:
170:
169:
162:
160:
142:
140:
56:
54:
41:
38:Stophidingbehind
22:Stophidingbehind
16:Dear "History,"
346:
345:
341:
340:
339:
337:
336:
335:
311:
296:
295:
248:
240:
231:
230:
216:
210:
205:
193:
184:Historyofpoetry
168:
155:
153:
135:
133:
108:page protection
80:Barrett Watten
69:
49:
47:
35:
12:
11:
5:
344:
342:
323:WP:COIDISCLOSE
310:
307:
249:
242:
241:
239:
236:
233:
232:
223:Teahouse hosts
211:
187:
180:
178:
167:
164:
68:
65:
63:
61:
60:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
343:
334:
333:
328:
324:
320:
316:
308:
306:
305:
300:
294:
292:
288:
284:
279:
277:
273:
269:
265:
259:
258:
256:
246:
237:
226:
224:
219:
215:Delivered by
208:
203:
201:
196:
191:
185:
179:
176:
172:
165:
163:
161:
159:
152:
146:
145:
141:
139:
131:
126:
122:
118:
117:
111:
109:
105:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
73:
66:
64:
59:
55:
53:
45:
39:
34:
33:
32:
31:
27:
23:
17:
312:
297:
280:
260:
254:
252:
250:
213:
190:the Teahouse
183:
181:
157:
150:
147:
137:
129:
113:
112:
77:
62:
51:
18:
15:
100:noticeboard
289:decision
274:, or the
268:sanctions
92:consensus
88:talk page
285:and the
253:It does
195:Missvain
156:General
136:General
128:warring—
102:or seek
84:edit war
67:May 2019
50:General
327:SarahSV
299:SarahSV
218:HostBot
158:Ization
138:Ization
125:reverts
52:Ization
291:here
200:talk
26:talk
255:not
202:).
182:Hi
110:.
46:.
28:)
20:--
198:(
40::
36:@
24:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
