268:
93:
41:
190:
FACT 3: A simple review of my edition backlog will show to any user that I only made contributions according to the Wiki standarts. None event of vandalism is of my autorship, I never vandalised anything! I think it affects me deeply, in a negative way, be confused with someone else and have my right
353:
Why you don't stop and think: hey, could someone, deliberately, trying to mess with Homem de Letras account by copying, word by word, the information he have? Maybe Homem de Letras got his account hacked, why not? I think you, misters, are frying me in the same pan as you frying OFFICER BOSCORELLI
178:
FACT 1: Perhaps I made myself unclear, since I am not well versed on
English and, not infrequently, I use the Google Translator to help me insert texts here. I made contribution on Zé Pilintra page because it is a well-known religious character here in my country. If "creation" means that I, as
197:
I ask, as evidence of good faith on me, that the ban be withdrawn and I can edit as usual. follow me and realize that I'm no wiki-thug! I want to keep my request for adminiship since I am not in debt with any other Wiki user nor with
Knowledge itself. Have a nice day.
179:
alleged, STARTED the page, it is not the truth! So, I am NOT OFFICER BOSCORELLI. When I wrote "from the scratch" I meaned: "restored the page from a blank content along with its references and well-styled text". It's a fact that the
183:
page is very well written and in accord to the
Brazilian religious beliefs, but, unfortunately, THIS IS NOT MY AUTORSHIP! I would like to congratulate those who autored the page because it's very accordingly to
187:
FACT 2: I made research on my behalf and I noticed that my account is FAR OLDER than the one from the blocked user, OFFICER BOSCORELLI. So, how can I be sock-puppet to an user with less Wiki-time than I?
220:
The evidence that you have misused multiple accounts is extremely clear and I see no reason to disturb this block. If you really intend to suggest that "your terminal is in common use" and that
22:
194:
FACT 4: My terminal is in common use, so I can not blamed for any misuse that may be associated with this machine (if the issues OFFICER BOSCORRELLI originates here).
394:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
308:
259:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
133:
303:
128:
412:, they have a lot of similarities (both from Minas Gerais, both students of business management, both claim to be police officers, etc.).
379:
244:
74:
322:
147:
62:
280:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
230:
105:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
281:
106:
48:
275:
100:
191:
to edit denied. I think the Wiki is a free and democratic territory and I hope that this unjust ban be lifted.
429:
417:
56:
30:
225:
447:
286:
199:
111:
82:
221:
425:
413:
26:
388:
354:
and, despite direct evidence relating MY account and some VANDALISM, you got NOTHING ON ME!
253:
68:
443:
433:
78:
21:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at
424:
Oh, and they're both exactly 29 years, 9 months, and 21 days old. Quite a coincidence.
180:
366:
451:
369:
234:
207:
86:
34:
40:
25:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
442:
That's quite enough personal attacks. Talk page access revoked.
224:
somehow applies, that's even more reason to leave it in place.
266:
91:
39:
376:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
241:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
396:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
261:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
410:
407:
336:
332:
326:
317:
313:
299:
295:
291:
161:
157:
151:
142:
138:
124:
120:
116:
274:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
99:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
365:Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --
59:through an indirect admission on your user page.
406:If you compare Homem de Letras's old user page
23:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
61:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may
8:
7:
14:
73:below, but you should read our
1:
420:) 12:51, 25 June 2010 (UTC
278:, who declined the request.
103:, who declined the request.
470:
452:02:36, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
434:12:52, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
409:and Officer Boscorelli's
380:guide to appealing blocks
370:17:31, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
245:guide to appealing blocks
235:13:12, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
208:12:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
87:20:45, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
75:guide to appealing blocks
35:20:43, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
401:
203:
57:User:Officer Boscorelli
402:For what it's worth...
271:
96:
44:
323:change block settings
270:
148:change block settings
95:
43:
71:|Your reason here}}
65:by adding the text
55:as a sockpuppet of
272:
97:
45:
233:
63:appeal this block
53:from editing for
461:
393:
387:
342:
340:
329:
311:
309:deleted contribs
269:
258:
252:
229:
226:Accounting4Taste
167:
165:
154:
136:
134:deleted contribs
94:
72:
469:
468:
464:
463:
462:
460:
459:
458:
404:
399:
391:
385:
384:, then use the
373:
356:
330:
320:
306:
289:
287:Homem de Letras
282:blocking policy
267:
264:
256:
250:
249:, then use the
238:
211:
200:Homem de Letras
155:
145:
131:
114:
112:Homem de Letras
107:blocking policy
92:
89:
66:
19:
12:
11:
5:
467:
465:
457:
456:
455:
454:
437:
436:
403:
400:
374:
363:
359:Decline reason
351:
347:Request reason
344:
265:
239:
218:
214:Decline reason
196:
195:
193:
192:
189:
188:
186:
185:
176:
172:Request reason
169:
90:
46:You have been
38:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
466:
453:
449:
445:
441:
440:
439:
438:
435:
431:
427:
426:SheepNotGoats
423:
422:
421:
419:
415:
414:SheepNotGoats
411:
408:
398:
397:
390:
383:
381:
372:
371:
368:
362:
360:
355:
350:
348:
343:
338:
334:
328:
324:
319:
315:
310:
305:
301:
300:global blocks
297:
296:active blocks
293:
288:
283:
279:
277:
276:administrator
263:
262:
255:
248:
246:
237:
236:
232:
227:
223:
217:
215:
210:
209:
205:
201:
182:
175:
173:
168:
163:
159:
153:
149:
144:
140:
135:
130:
126:
125:global blocks
122:
121:active blocks
118:
113:
108:
104:
102:
101:administrator
88:
84:
80:
76:
70:
64:
60:
58:
52:
50:
42:
37:
36:
32:
28:
27:SheepNotGoats
24:
16:
405:
395:
377:
375:
364:
358:
357:
352:
346:
345:
318:creation log
285:
273:
260:
242:
240:
222:WP:GOTHACKED
219:
213:
212:
177:
171:
170:
143:creation log
110:
98:
54:
51:indefinitely
47:
20:
181:Zé Pilintra
444:Courcelles
314:filter log
139:filter log
79:Courcelles
378:read the
333:checkuser
292:block log
243:read the
158:checkuser
117:block log
17:June 2010
367:jpgordon
304:contribs
184:reality.
129:contribs
389:unblock
327:unblock
254:unblock
152:unblock
77:first.
69:unblock
49:blocked
382:first
247:first
448:talk
430:talk
418:talk
231:talk
204:talk
83:talk
31:talk
337:log
284:).
162:log
109:).
450:)
432:)
392:}}
386:{{
361::
349::
331:•
325:•
321:•
316:•
312:•
307:•
302:•
298:•
294:•
257:}}
251:{{
216::
206:)
198:--
174::
156:•
150:•
146:•
141:•
137:•
132:•
127:•
123:•
119:•
85:)
67:{{
33:)
446:(
428:(
416:(
341:)
339:)
335:(
290:(
228::
202:(
166:)
164:)
160:(
115:(
81:(
29:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
