952:. Maybe it's because my first post I wasn't logged in but I have no doubt this page is on your watchlist; if it isn't I'd think it should be. I'm not exactly back, just have some time to kill, so killing stupid ideas seems like a good waste of time....maybe you have something to add here; to me this guy's reasoning is even more spurious than his facts....why is it so popular to attack the English language? Is there similar criticism of the Chinese language within the Chinese-speaking world? As with "Chinaman", the tub seems to be thumping over-loudly here; Chinglish is not a pejorative usage, just a hybrid term...what this guy thinks woudl constitute "academic proof" is quite beyond me; it's like asking for a proof that the sky is blue; the proof is taking a photo of it, I suppose; in this case it's sufficient to point to mainstream publications which have used the term, and it doesn't really amtter whether the term is prejudicial or not. This guy's long-winded point-by-point puts my own "rants" to shame in its thoroughness, at least I'm not irrelevant when I "rant"....it reminds me of Bo Yang's points about the behaviour of Chinese people when confronted with facts they don't like: change the facts, and tell your opponent who's bearing them that they need to learn conciliation. Anyway, maybe there's something pithy you can say to him that will end this nonsense; if he wants the article deleted he's welcome to create a user account and then nominate it for AfD; you and I both know it would fail that AfD....
1447:, or in this case just asking me to intervene, as we have already discussed the issue before). That way I can protect the page (which I have now done) which will either stop the edit warring or will force the IP to engage in discussion; simply reverting every day is not a way to solve problems, and you are in a position where you don't have the tools (blocks or protections) or the right (because you are already involved in the edit warring) to solve the problem. I didn't block you or the IP this time because I want to see if protection solves the problem, but don't think you can keep on edit warring. Again: if you encounter an editor like this, resolve the dispute through the proper channels, rather than just revert-warring for months.
347:
Saturday (March 27, 2010). I (or someone else) will edit the page accordingly in due course. Before you resume your self-appointed gatekeeper role, I'd be grateful if read the papers or simply do an online search, and you will discover that BrandHK has indeed been changed. The edited page will simply reflect these changes. Whether you like the changes or not is irrelevant - they have taken place. Whether you feel the brand's core values and attributes accurately describe HK is also irrelevant - these words or phrases have been chosen to describe the brand.
1487:
115:
31:
1300:
1536:
493:
1613:
238:
1361:
interested in discussion, 2) that WP bureaucracy is extremely slow especially since this is not a case of vandalism and while I'm waiting for action to actually be taken, incorrect information could be on an article for weeks, and 3) the user can easily register another account or use another IP to do the same edit. By the way, the information about MC Chang's wife is here:
653:
549:
1700:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
1384:
You've had 2 months to add that footnote and didn't; the fact that another editor is being tendentious doesn't give you an excuse to be tendentious as well. You always could have asked an outside editor to review the edits, after which if the IP continued edit warring then he would have been blocked;
346:
Hello again, HongQiGong. I note that once again you removed changes to the BrandHK page and reinstated the old, out of date and inaccurate material. Anyway, you should be interested to know that this page is now even more out of date, because BrandHK was relaunched with a new image and description on
1209:
is really quite shocking. You have been edit-warring with someone there for nearly 2 months, reverting almost every day, and as far as I can tell neither you nor the other editor has ever made an attempt to discuss the issue at the article talkpage or a user talkpage, all you have done was leave one
788:
hi, dozens of your reverts are done with a reason "no source" on but you don't seem to feel like discussing it even if the reverts are disputed. In all those cases, "no source" is REALLY the only reason for your revert because they aren't plagiarism, vandalism or defamation. A tag "Citation needed"
1037:
on the game and I wonder if more could be found. I don't know if there is any
Chinese (Cantonese) Google books where infos could be found, but if so it might be a good start. The game's known in China under the name Kanhu, Kanu or Dohu maybe. Dates, names and places are important too. I placed this
1650:
and discuss the matters so that we can reach a community consensus. I'd like to have it done before
Christmas, so I can spend the break making any necessary changes. The importance discussion is at the top of the page. The scope discussion is at the bottom, but we can move them together if we need
1645:
Hello. This message is to inform you that I have called for a reexamination of the scope document and the ratings system used by the project. The ratings system especially has run into problems and could benefit from a simplification and generalizations. The scope, too, could be reexamined to the
1405:
Nah, it was easier and less time consuming just to revert. And technically an editor cannot edit war just by himself or herself. So we'd have to let his bad edit stay if we were to avoid reverting, because he seems pretty determine to just revert to his edit. But now that you are here, you can
1360:
Ok cool. Will you protect the version you just added? By the way I know you want some kind of explanation to my behaviour, so here it is: yes I've been around long enough to know edit warring is frowned upon. I've also been around long enough to know that 1) a single-edit account or IP is not
1130:
My honest opinion is that this is a waste of time. It's not the first time the naming of this article and other similar articles of disputed geographical areas have been brought up and/or changed. These discussions will keep popping up until the disputes between those governments have been
891:
expires in 20 September 2010, I feel like we should take this opportunity to push the article to FA status without vandalism interferences. I started cleaning up the
History section since that was a section where we received large amount of negative remarks on. I thought about requesting a
723:
Over the course of a month, it has become apparent that both the parties proposing to include or not include those romanizations cannot be convinced by the arguments or guidelines brought up by the other side. Therefore, a compromise is trying to be found that will satisfy both parties.
1274:
I'm blocking you for long-term edit-warring. You are welcome to contest the block, but if you do so I advise you that an admin will be more likely to unblock you if you acknowledge the disruptive nature of your edits and give your assurance that you won't do it again in the future.
1438:
was not wise, given that you have already been blocked for making the exact same revert at the exact same article. Yes, I know the IP is being a bad boy and this time your edit is sourced, but still you should resolve these disputes through the proper channels
264:
165:
We would like to clarify that Mr. Chan's family originates from Shunde, Guangdong, instead of
Taishan. As such, we have already updated the concerned article with corresponding references (version as of Hong Kong time 6:30pm, 12 February 2010).
621:
Why did you revert my removal of a category sitting higher in the cat tree? All
Chinese Olympic basketball players belonging to this category shouldn't appear time and time again - your inclusion of higher category makes as much sense as adding
136:
I find this bizarre. I have the same message on my talk page, and am wondering if it's not a case of mistaken identity, maybe? Doesn't seem to concern me or be remotely related to any articles I usually edit, except the colour of my skin...
1161:) to commemorate the 5th anniversary of the Hong Kong Wikimedian community. You're sincerely invited, since it'll be great to get a few core members of the English Knowledge (XXG) community in Hong Kong to come along! --
967:
Actually it's really not on my watchlist. That article looks like another giant time sink. I'm not going to get involved. It might benefit from a more academic name, I suppose. I've only heard the term used for
1364:. It is one of the links in the References section, but it just wasn't footnoted in my edit. You can either add back that info about his wife or wait for my block to be over and I'll add it back. Thanks.
509:. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from
252:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also
1563:
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
209:
566:
prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for
322:. Since you've helped out with the article, perhaps you'd like to come and participate? I'm asking other users to join as well, and would appreciate your contributions. Thanks in advance!!!
766:
732:
725:
717:
690:
919:
Not sure how much I will be contributing. I don't devote nearly as much time to WP as I used to anymore. But I'll definitely help out when I can, if you decide to make a push for it.
1218:
template at each user's talkpage. If either of you continue this, I will either protect the article or block both of you for edit warring. You have been here long enough to know about
263:
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to
1271:, again with no explanation. So you're refusing to acknowledge that you edit-warred, and you're asking me to protect "your" version of the article? Absolutely unacceptable behavior.
389:
1693:
419:'s notability. I created this article when I was fairly new here and was not as aware of the notability guidelines for biographies. In the coming days, I'll merge it into
249:
231:
520:
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our
1038:
same message on User:Yue
Chinese talk page but I'd like to find other editors who can speak Chinese and related dialects and see if they could help ! Best regards,
128:
1003:
999:
1549:. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the
510:
1557:
513:
is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with
Knowledge (XXG) policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an
514:
1697:
521:
1647:
1478:
1332:
525:
1620:
1601:
728:
on a compromise has been given already, but it has not found unanimous agreement, so additional compromises are encouraged to be suggested.
1616:
1605:
185:
1701:
731:
One universally accepted point was to bring more users from the affected projects in to help achieve consensus, and you were one of those
169:
We appreciate your previous contribution to Mr. Chan’s profile on the
Knowledge (XXG) database. Thank you very much for your attention.
505:. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Knowledge (XXG) may not meet the criteria required by
159:
On behalf of Hang Lung
Properties, I would like to make clarifications regarding your edited article "Ronnie Chan" on Knowledge (XXG)
1546:
1493:
227:
1006:) on whether to rename the article "Standard Mandarin" to the title "Modern Standard Chinese" or "Standard Chinese", as proposed by
1416:
1374:
1257:
1141:
1067:
982:
929:
855:
830:
Not all
Koreans are racist. I for one however respect China. But it's the internet that breeds flamewars. Sad reality, isn't it?
814:
473:
1585:
1578:
1158:
371:
97:
1219:
89:
84:
72:
67:
59:
1320:
1054:
667:
571:
563:
517:; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
908:
506:
245:
1449:
1387:
1337:
1277:
1228:
1550:
1307:
1492:
Another editor has noticed your contributions to articles related to East Asia, and would like to invite you to join
594:
1174:
38:
1385:
making 50-some identical reverts to an article in less than two months is unacceptable no matter how you cut it.
1053:
Sounds like a very interesting topic. But I just don't have enough time to research this. Maybe people over at
635:
327:
217:
1316:
1120:
794:
501:
893:
319:
189:
1669:
1513:
597:
398:
359:
253:
181:
1627:
774:
1362:
972:
between Chinese and English, and not what is basically examples of bad Chinese-to-English translations.
716:(for the sake of simplicity, I called this case "words of English origin", more information on semantics
1709:
1486:
1213:
1188:
1165:
1099:
hi, you seemed to follow this article before. There is an ongoing discussion about changing the name of
1082:
1043:
1034:
1007:
429:
143:
1115:, which has exhaustively proven to become a gala for nationalists but left nothing to the community. --
662:
605:
567:
558:
288:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --
670:
prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Thank you.--
448:
and elsewhere in what could obviously been a very contentious subject. I hope I can return the favor.
1568:
1412:
1370:
1253:
1137:
1063:
1015:
978:
925:
851:
810:
770:
631:
533:
469:
323:
293:
213:
47:
17:
671:
1116:
870:
835:
790:
675:
367:
352:
601:
1655:
1507:
957:
623:
394:
593:
I have no software or program to type hanzi, so i need the characters in the image at this link
193:
1584:
There is currently a policy discussion that may concern a Wikiproject that you are a member of
415:
Hello HongQiGong, nice to meet you. After some consideration, I agree with your questioning of
1624:
1029:
Hello, User:HongQiGong, I wonder if you could find me some historical information on the game
1004:
I suggest Modern Standard Chinese as the English name for article now titled Standard Mandarin
904:
579:
121:
114:
1444:
1107:
to avoid stirring up an endless nationalistic debate over naming convention as we can see in
1705:
1458:
1396:
1346:
1326:
1286:
1237:
1181:
1162:
1104:
1078:
1039:
845:
You don't have to keep repeating that not all Koreans are racist. Nobody ever claimed that.
453:
424:
274:
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the
138:
1440:
285:
275:
268:
257:
1564:
1407:
1365:
1299:
1248:
1206:
1132:
1108:
1100:
1058:
1011:
973:
920:
846:
805:
627:
529:
464:
445:
338:
289:
1223:
265:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/World Information Technology and Services Alliance
1590:
969:
949:
866:
831:
363:
348:
1713:
1678:
1632:
1595:
1572:
1520:
1462:
1421:
1400:
1379:
1350:
1290:
1262:
1241:
1195:
1168:
1146:
1124:
1086:
1072:
1047:
1019:
987:
961:
934:
913:
874:
860:
839:
819:
798:
778:
679:
639:
609:
583:
574:. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. Thank you.
537:
478:
457:
434:
402:
375:
331:
297:
244:
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for
221:
145:
953:
600:. I know its from a blog, but i already have reliable sources proving that it exists.
278:
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
1535:
804:
Or people can just stop inserting information that is not backed up by any source.
1560:
until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
1112:
898:
575:
1619:
has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
656:
Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits, as you are doing in
552:
Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits, as you are doing in
175:
May Lam, Senior Manager, Corporate Communications, Hang Lung Properties Limited (
492:
449:
314:
304:
176:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1612:
387:
Hello. You are invited to take part in the deletion discussion on the redirect
237:
416:
408:
1542:
1527:
1497:
942:
888:
657:
645:
205:
1586:
Wikipedia_talk:Article_titles#Non-Roman_characters_in_redirects_to_articles
1579:
Wikipedia_talk:Article_titles#Non-Roman_characters_in_redirects_to_articles
615:
553:
1406:
protect the article to a state where the material is sourced. Thanks!
652:
548:
1030:
444:
My most sincere thanks and commendation for your recent cooperation on
420:
695:
including or not including romanizations for words of English origin
744:
You should give feedback on the first suggested compromise and are
1689:
892:
copy-editor to take quick look at it too, since I'm concern about
1315:
for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
950:
Talk:Chinglish#The_Spurious_Reasoning_Encouraged_by_This_Article
948:
Jeez, Hong, I thought you'd be all over me by now on this one -
758:
This is not a vote on including or excluding such romanizations.
210:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Hong Kong/archive2
25:
488:
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:AdultOctopusCard.jpg
383:
Deletion discussion: Comparison between roman and han empires
1472:
Per your participation in the WikiProject Council proposal,
1298:
1247:
I would love it if you could protect the article. Thanks.
491:
236:
160:
131:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
113:
1696:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets
1545:, which you created or to which you contributed, should be
1621:
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page
1226:, and other outlets for resolving content disagreements.
1435:
1268:
1180:
HI, could you translate this from Chinese into English?
765:
It would be highly appreciated if you came over to the
1077:
I have tried that already, but I understand. Regards,
423:; you can do it if you want. Thanks for the heads-up!
1157:
There will be a gathering in Hong Kong this weekend (
998:
Hi, editor of WikiProject China, please come to the
524:. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
312:
Hello, HongQiGong! I'm trying to get the article on
769:and helped find a solution. Thank you in advance.
250:World Information Technology and Services Alliance
232:World Information Technology and Services Alliance
1541:A discussion has begun about whether the article
1477:
1000:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Naming conventions (Chinese)
1496:, a collaborative effort to improve coverage of
511:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free use rationale guideline
1558:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Ethnoburb
709:
703:
570:, even if they do not technically violate the
1319:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may
120:Hello, HongQiGong. You have new messages at
8:
746:highly encouraged to provide other solutions
596:typed up so i can put it into this article
589:I Need this typed up in Traditional chinese
1648:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject East Asia
1474:
208:for FAR. Can you give your opinion here :
152:Clarification of Mr. Ronnie Chan's Profile
1641:WikiProject East Asia Scope & Ratings
1267:And you say that mere seconds before you
761:This is not a vote on compromises either.
685:Romanization for words of English origin
390:Comparison between roman and han empires
204:Hello ! I have nominated this article :
1476:
284:This is an automatic notification by a
887:Hi HongQiGong, the semi-protected for
693:, a discussion has been started about
660:. It appears you may be engaged in an
556:. It appears you may be engaged in an
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1323:by adding below this notice the text
789:can be used to avoid edit warring. --
7:
1617:Template:Disambig-Chinese-char-title
1606:Template:Disambig-Chinese-char-title
1033:. User:Ccyber5 kindly provided some
1159:Knowledge (XXG):Meetup/Hong Kong 51
24:
1556:The article will be discussed at
1055:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject China
1611:
1534:
1485:
651:
547:
507:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content
29:
1095:Diaoyu Islands /Senkaku Islands
1463:04:39, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
1422:17:02, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
1401:16:57, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
1380:16:53, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
1351:16:37, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
1291:16:37, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
1263:16:27, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
1242:16:07, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
1196:18:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
1169:07:44, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
1147:17:34, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
1125:11:39, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
1087:20:01, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
1073:17:31, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
526:media copyright questions page
1:
1714:18:18, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
1679:07:13, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
1596:02:13, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
1573:09:35, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
1311:from editing for a period of
1048:16:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
697:, such as Fainaru Fantajī in
355:) 04:20, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
222:13:49, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
194:10:34, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
1694:featured article review here
1633:04:55, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
1521:06:01, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
1448:
1386:
1336:
1276:
1227:
1002:and help on the discussion (
753:What this invitation is not:
522:criteria for speedy deletion
318:ready for DYK, and possibly
146:01:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
1020:20:53, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
988:22:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
962:20:30, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
935:06:53, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
914:03:02, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
875:14:24, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
861:14:18, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
840:14:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
820:13:58, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
799:08:09, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
710:
258:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
248:. The nominated article is
1729:
1331:, but you should read the
1175:List of townships of Anhui
1010:. Your reply is needed.--
994:Renaming Standard Mandarin
779:11:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
435:02:27, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
403:01:51, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
376:04:17, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
332:19:43, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
254:Knowledge (XXG):Notability
109:Yellowface and Racebending
1698:featured article criteria
1646:same end. Please come to
1479:WikiProject North America
1333:guide to appealing blocks
1317:make useful contributions
704:
680:00:42, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
640:00:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
610:20:15, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
502:File:AdultOctopusCard.jpg
479:13:42, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
458:03:42, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
298:01:04, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
271:with four tildes (~~~~).
739:What this invitation is:
584:17:22, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
538:09:06, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
499:Thank you for uploading
1602:Nomination for deletion
668:three-revert rule (3RR)
598:The Hundred-word Eulogy
564:three-revert rule (3RR)
324:Oh no! It's not here!!!
151:
1303:
883:Hong Kong to FA status
496:
241:
118:
1494:WikiProject East Asia
1302:
1008:User:WeijiBaikeBianji
495:
276:articles for deletion
240:
117:
42:of past discussions.
1500:on Knowledge (XXG).
826:Let me just say that
784:avoid abusing revert
267:. Please be sure to
18:User talk:HongQiGong
1329:|Your reason here}}
1153:Hong Kong gathering
515:image copyright tag
122:Nemogbr's talk page
1304:
1220:dispute resolution
1103:to a more neutral
624:Category:Sportsmen
497:
269:sign your comments
242:
129:remove this notice
119:
1688:I have nominated
1676:
1504:
1503:
1420:
1378:
1321:appeal this block
1261:
1205:Your behavior at
1145:
1071:
986:
933:
912:
859:
818:
572:three-revert rule
477:
379:
362:comment added by
184:comment added by
172:Yours sincerely,
156:Dear HongQiGong,
103:
102:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1720:
1675:
1670:
1667:
1615:
1538:
1519:
1510:
1489:
1475:
1453:
1410:
1391:
1368:
1341:
1330:
1281:
1251:
1232:
1217:
1135:
1105:Pinnacle Islands
1061:
976:
923:
902:
849:
808:
767:MOS:JP talk page
735:in the process.
715:
713:
707:
706:
691:MOS:JP talk page
655:
551:
467:
432:
427:
378:
356:
196:
141:
132:
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1728:
1727:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1686:
1671:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1643:
1630:
1609:
1582:
1551:deletion policy
1539:
1532:
1518:
1508:
1506:
1470:
1451:
1389:
1353:
1339:
1324:
1279:
1230:
1211:
1207:Min Chueh Chang
1203:
1178:
1155:
1109:Liancourt Rocks
1101:Senkaku Islands
1097:
1035:historical info
1027:
996:
946:
885:
828:
786:
711:Fainaru Fantajī
701:
687:
649:
632:Lukasz Lukomski
628:Category:People
619:
591:
545:
490:
446:Chinaman (term)
442:
430:
425:
413:
385:
357:
344:
339:Brand Hong Kong
310:
235:
214:Toutvientapoint
202:
179:
154:
139:
133:
126:
111:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1726:
1724:
1685:
1682:
1662:
1658:
1642:
1639:
1637:
1628:
1608:
1599:
1581:
1576:
1533:
1531:
1526:Nomination of
1524:
1512:
1502:
1501:
1490:
1482:
1481:
1469:
1466:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1305:You have been
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1272:
1269:reverted again
1202:
1199:
1192:
1185:
1177:
1172:
1154:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1117:Winstonlighter
1096:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1026:
1023:
995:
992:
991:
990:
970:code switching
945:
939:
938:
937:
894:WP:FA Criteria
884:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
865:No harm done?
827:
824:
823:
822:
791:Winstonlighter
785:
782:
763:
762:
759:
750:
749:
726:One suggestion
686:
683:
648:
643:
618:
613:
590:
587:
544:
541:
489:
486:
484:
482:
481:
441:
438:
412:
406:
384:
381:
343:
335:
309:
301:
234:
230:nomination of
225:
201:
198:
186:218.189.81.105
153:
150:
149:
148:
125:
112:
110:
107:
105:
101:
100:
95:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1725:
1716:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1683:
1681:
1680:
1677:
1674:
1668:
1666:
1652:
1649:
1640:
1638:
1635:
1634:
1631:
1626:
1623:. Thank you.
1622:
1618:
1614:
1607:
1603:
1600:
1598:
1597:
1593:
1592:
1587:
1580:
1577:
1575:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1561:
1559:
1554:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1537:
1529:
1525:
1523:
1522:
1517:
1516:
1511:
1509:Sven Manguard
1499:
1495:
1491:
1488:
1484:
1483:
1480:
1473:
1467:
1465:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1455:
1446:
1442:
1437:
1423:
1418:
1414:
1409:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1393:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1376:
1372:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1343:
1334:
1328:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1309:
1301:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1283:
1273:
1270:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1259:
1255:
1250:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1234:
1225:
1221:
1215:
1208:
1200:
1198:
1197:
1194:
1193:
1190:
1187:
1186:
1183:
1176:
1173:
1171:
1170:
1167:
1164:
1160:
1152:
1148:
1143:
1139:
1134:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1094:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1069:
1065:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1036:
1032:
1024:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
993:
989:
984:
980:
975:
971:
966:
965:
964:
963:
959:
955:
951:
944:
940:
936:
931:
927:
922:
918:
917:
916:
915:
910:
906:
901:
900:
895:
890:
882:
876:
872:
868:
864:
863:
862:
857:
853:
848:
844:
843:
842:
841:
837:
833:
825:
821:
816:
812:
807:
803:
802:
801:
800:
796:
792:
783:
781:
780:
776:
772:
768:
760:
757:
756:
755:
754:
747:
743:
742:
741:
740:
736:
734:
729:
727:
721:
719:
712:
700:
699:Final Fantasy
696:
692:
684:
682:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
664:
659:
654:
647:
644:
642:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
617:
614:
612:
611:
607:
603:
599:
595:
588:
586:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
560:
555:
550:
542:
540:
539:
535:
531:
528:. Thank you.
527:
523:
518:
516:
512:
508:
504:
503:
494:
487:
485:
480:
475:
471:
466:
463:No problem!
462:
461:
460:
459:
455:
451:
447:
439:
437:
436:
433:
428:
422:
418:
410:
407:
405:
404:
400:
396:
395:Gun Powder Ma
392:
391:
382:
380:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
354:
350:
341:
340:
336:
334:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:
307:
306:
302:
300:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
277:
272:
270:
266:
261:
259:
255:
251:
247:
239:
233:
229:
226:
224:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
199:
197:
195:
191:
187:
183:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
161:
157:
147:
144:
142:
135:
134:
130:
123:
116:
108:
106:
99:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1687:
1672:
1657:
1653:
1644:
1636:
1625:Plastikspork
1610:
1589:
1583:
1562:
1555:
1540:
1530:for deletion
1514:
1505:
1471:
1434:
1408:Hong Qi Gong
1366:Hong Qi Gong
1312:
1306:
1249:Hong Qi Gong
1214:uw-unsourced
1204:
1201:Edit warring
1189:
1182:
1179:
1156:
1133:Hong Qi Gong
1113:Sea of Japan
1098:
1059:Hong Qi Gong
1028:
997:
974:Hong Qi Gong
947:
921:Hong Qi Gong
897:
896:1a. Thanks,
886:
847:Hong Qi Gong
829:
806:Hong Qi Gong
787:
764:
752:
751:
745:
738:
737:
730:
722:
698:
694:
688:
661:
650:
620:
592:
568:edit warring
557:
546:
519:
500:
498:
483:
465:Hong Qi Gong
443:
414:
388:
386:
345:
337:
313:
311:
303:
282:Please note:
281:
280:
273:
262:
243:
203:
174:
171:
168:
164:
158:
155:
104:
78:
43:
37:
1706:Dana boomer
1654:Thank you,
1436:This revert
1131:resolved.
1079:Krenakarore
1057:can help.
1040:Krenakarore
941:IP user re
705:ファイナルファンタジー
426:Airplaneman
358:—Preceding
315:Linheraptor
305:Linheraptor
180:—Preceding
140:Ohconfucius
36:This is an
1565:Shadowjams
1012:TheLeopard
771:Prime Blue
530:Sfan00 IMG
417:Fred Chang
411:notability
409:Fred Chang
393:. Regards
290:Erwin85Bot
212:. Thanks.
98:Archive 10
1591:Handschuh
1543:Ethnoburb
1528:Ethnoburb
1498:East Asia
943:Chinglish
899:Ta-Va-Tar
889:Hong Kong
867:Komitsuki
832:Komitsuki
672:Veritasho
658:Nunchucks
646:Nunchucks
543:July 2010
364:PMJ Regan
349:PMJ Regan
206:Hong Kong
200:Hong Kong
90:Archive 7
85:Archive 6
79:Archive 5
73:Archive 4
68:Archive 3
60:Archive 1
1417:Contribs
1375:Contribs
1258:Contribs
1142:Contribs
1068:Contribs
983:Contribs
954:Skookum1
930:Contribs
856:Contribs
815:Contribs
733:selected
663:edit war
616:Yao Ming
559:edit war
554:Lucy Liu
474:Contribs
372:contribs
360:unsigned
246:deletion
182:unsigned
127:You can
1665:anguard
1547:deleted
1445:WP:RFPP
1335:first.
1327:unblock
1308:blocked
1191:Blofeld
1031:Khanhoo
1025:Khanhoo
905:discuss
689:On the
602:Дунгане
576:magnius
39:archive
1692:for a
1468:Invite
1441:WP:AN3
1313:1 week
1166:yck C.
666:. The
562:. The
450:μηδείς
440:Thanks
421:Newegg
1690:Japan
1651:to.
1224:WP:3O
909:what?
256:and "
16:<
1710:talk
1702:here
1673:Wha?
1661:ven
1569:talk
1515:Talk
1459:talk
1454:anaɢ
1413:Talk
1397:talk
1392:anaɢ
1371:Talk
1347:talk
1342:anaɢ
1287:talk
1282:anaɢ
1254:Talk
1238:talk
1233:anaɢ
1138:Talk
1121:talk
1111:and
1083:talk
1064:Talk
1044:talk
1016:talk
979:Talk
958:talk
926:Talk
871:talk
852:Talk
836:talk
811:Talk
795:talk
775:talk
718:here
676:talk
636:talk
606:talk
580:talk
534:talk
470:Talk
454:talk
399:talk
368:talk
353:talk
328:talk
294:talk
260:").
218:talk
190:talk
1684:FAR
1604:of
1184:Dr.
1163:Der
720:).
626:or
320:ITN
286:bot
228:AfD
178:)
162:.
1712:)
1704:.
1629:―Œ
1594:-
1588:.
1571:)
1553:.
1461:)
1443:,
1415:-
1399:)
1373:-
1349:)
1325:{{
1289:)
1256:-
1240:)
1222:,
1216:}}
1212:{{
1140:-
1123:)
1085:)
1066:-
1046:)
1018:)
981:-
960:)
928:-
873:)
854:-
838:)
813:-
797:)
777:)
708:,
678:)
638:)
630:.
608:)
582:)
536:)
472:-
456:)
401:)
374:)
370:•
330:)
296:)
220:)
192:)
94:→
64:←
1708:(
1663:M
1659:S
1567:(
1457:(
1452:ʨ
1450:r
1439:(
1419:)
1411:(
1395:(
1390:ʨ
1388:r
1377:)
1369:(
1345:(
1340:ʨ
1338:r
1285:(
1280:ʨ
1278:r
1260:)
1252:(
1236:(
1231:ʨ
1229:r
1144:)
1136:(
1119:(
1081:(
1070:)
1062:(
1042:(
1014:(
985:)
977:(
956:(
932:)
924:(
911:)
907:–
903:(
869:(
858:)
850:(
834:(
817:)
809:(
793:(
773:(
748:.
714:)
702:(
674:(
634:(
604:(
578:(
532:(
476:)
468:(
452:(
431:✈
397:(
366:(
351:(
342:.
326:(
308:.
292:(
216:(
188:(
124:.
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
