User talk:Hoopes/Archive 2 - Knowledge (XXG)

3286:

believes the World Trade Center was brought down by a nuclear bomb. Should I include her views on the relevant Knowledge (XXG) page? No, because her views have had no wider impact. I have always been of the opinion that regardless of who thought of what crazy idea when, Mardyks is not worthy of inclusion because his ideas have had no wider impact. Whatever impact they've had has been solely due to his own raging about being so hard done by. You might argue that is impact enough, but if that is the case then we've just told every crackpot on Earth that if they scream loud and long enough they'll eventually be taken seriously. If that's the world you want to live in, fine.

2312: 31: 3451:, I trace my encounter with the Galactic Alignment concept and mention other researchers who have explored the concept. Mardyks is mentioned." I think it's fair to say that the community in which this information circulates is not one that's known for scholarly practice, including direct attributions. I can't prove it, but I suspect the phenomenon of 2948:

is that an astrological publication is the very definition of an unreliable source. Astrologers are not known for the rigour of their peer review. If Mardyks were recognised as a driving force of the 2012 phenomenon, then his writings would be allowed on the basis of notability, but by and large, he isn't. So the source is not useable I'm afraid.

3612:

the MARDYKS discussion is now longer than the source article itself. It seems my NOTABILITY is on the rise. :) I am now counting to see how many minutes it takes for you to "CENSOR" this comment. 1 ... 2 ... 3 ... Maybe you should just breathe and try another approach, like TRUSTING! Trick or treat! *M* 17:16, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

1970: 3063:, a source whose notability is evidenced by the fact that it has an entry in Knowledge (XXG)! The citation has nothing at all do to with the issue of reliability. There is no implication that what Mardyks wrote is a reliable statement, only that the statement was actually made. It is a simple statement of 3085:

is not your forte. The issue is not whether astrology is reliable or correct or anything of the kind. The issue is one of what professional astrologers actually write and think and when. As noted above, Knowledge (XXG) has several entries on astrology. As a cultural and historical phenomenon, it is

2927:

edited by Joseph Gelfer. However, I'm still unclear on how citing facts and a direct quotation from Mardyks' 1991 article represent "conclusions" or "interpretations." They're facts and a quotation. Does reproducing them constitute "original research"? A better explanation of what's meant by that

2546:

However, the requirement that they do it in English on a computer with Internet access means that "the modern Maya" whose input it gets will not be those who can write only in Spanish, a Mayan language (of which there are LOTS), or who cannot write at all and have no access to Knowledge (XXG). Those

2420:

It's an excellent point. However, I think it's important to point out that both "the ancient Maya" and "the modern Maya" are convenient fictions that deny the considerable variation that has always existed in the culture of Mayan-speaking peoples. (The definition of the term "Maya" itself is a modern

1755:

I talked to you after class last week about doing alternative hypotheses of the Olmecs. I checked the page and it has and alternative section, but it also breaks off to another page which i would like to add David Hatcher Childress' ideas to. i didnt find his name or the book you handed out in class

3553:

That may be true, but it's not Knowledge (XXG)'s job to make such assumptions. Academics are free to do so, and when they do, Knowledge (XXG) is free to quote them. But Knowledge (XXG) isn't an academic journal; it has no innate authority. It cannot make any claims; only report the claims of others.

2096:

Andrew Vance: Professor Hoopes, I ran into some troule concerning my page. For some reason my page is already up for deletion. I will stop by your office hours tomorrow, the problem is that is went up for deletion while I was beginning to format it tonight. Does that mean I loose all of my work?

1148:

Hi Brigid! I think it would depend on which cave people you mean. Ancient humans lived in caves in a wide variety of different habitats in many different geographic regions, from China to Iraq to France to Mexico to Peru and elsewhere. They ate different specific things, which had more to do with

3611:

THIS IS A RESPONSE TO SERENDIPODOUS/OUS: I definately wouldn't say what's happening here makes me HAPPY, POD. A tiny, little bit of satisfaction, maybe. Remember from the Sante Fe Reporter article that the goal was "to machete a path through the 2012 stupidity". I do find it rather interesting that

3006:

Material such as an article, book, monograph, or research paper that has been vetted by the scholarly community is regarded as reliable. If the material has been published in reputable peer-reviewed sources or by well-regarded academic presses, generally it has been at least preliminarily vetted by

2947:

It gets tricky. If it didn't, Knowledge (XXG) would be a far more harmonious place than it is. Basically it boils down to two axions: 1. Knowledge (XXG) cannot interpret, only report. 2. All sources must be reliable. The issue of quoting Mardyks directly, as opposed to an academic paper citing him,

2266:

Dr. Hoopes, I finished my wikipedia page over Jacob Gass. I wrote to the publisher of "The Davenport Conspiracy Revisited" requesting if I could get copyright permission to use a couple of the photographs for my page, I did this last week and they still haven't gotten back to me yet. If they do I

2977:

what astrologers or people who believe in and practice astrology think! A skeptic or atheist might well say "the Bible is the very definition of an unreliable source" or "the Pope is the very definition of an unreliable source." An anarchist might say "the government is the very definition of an

2282:

Professor, I have submitted my article on the live page, however I am having issues getting the references to show up properly without errors. I followed what they said to do on their help page, but to no avail. If there is anything you can do to help me with fixing the reference listing I have to

2236:

Would you take a look at my article at my user sub-page. I have yet to include the citations I plan on because I haven't quite figured out the citing process. Additionally, there will be a little more content on all his works. Just haven't gotten there as of yet. Thanks. (Also, my brain hurts from

3398:

Can you point to me any direct link between the current galactic alignment concept and Raymond Mardyks? How many websites, scholarly papers, New Age publications or any similar materials credit Mardyks for bringing the galactic alignment to world attention? I'm not talking about citations. I mean

2855:

as far as I care. What matters is not who he is, but what he says. Your own comments about astrology and about topics directly pertinent to the subject of this article suggest you are not especially well informed or well qualified to evaluate its content. I urge you to read some of the work on

3538:

in 1991. Chagrined as this may make some feel, it seems likely that it was Mardyks who coined the phrase "galactic alignment" in the first place. Another is his documented direct influence (an as-yet undocumented indirect influence also seems likely) on key writers such as John Major Jenkins.

3112:

I've left a message on Dougweller's page asking him to clarify whether he thinks The Mountain Astrologer qualifies as a valid source in this context. And as I said above, I have no problem with academic journals siting fringe material; journals have their own authority to back them up. Knowledge

3348:

themes he discussed in that article have become amplified enormously in the subsequent 1500+ books, films, websites, and so forth that discuss the significance of 2012. Would it be helpful for me to include some citations to Mardyks' 1991 article in other publications? Or would that constitute

3285:

You probably missed where he was spamming and insulting everybody, including those who agreed with him. Anyway. The issue of inclusion vs exclusion is mainly about "notability"; i.e. is this just one guy spouting off, or has his particular brand of idiocy actually had a wider impact? My auntie

3031:

For God's sake Hoopes! Knowledge (XXG) does not consider an astrological magazine a reliable source! If it did Mardyks would have been included in the article years ago! Why can't you understand this? You're a professional scholar! You must understand that there's no such thing as a creditable

2398:

Leaving Mardyks aside for the moment, the biggest current flaw with the 2012 article is its lack of input from the modern Maya. I had to remove all references to modern responses when a particularly vociferous editor challenged the validity of my sources. Do you know of any decent sources that

1132:

Brigid Dunn---Hey Dr. Hoopes, my friend was telling me about the caveman diet,a modern diet based on the historical diet of cave people. It got me thinking about doing a page on the actual diet of cavemen, or something along that line...evolution of diet maybe? Do you have any suggestions?

3113:(XXG) doesn't. And yes sometimes siting fringe sites or articles is valid, but usually only if the person involved has had a significant impact on the concept being discussed. Still, if Dougweller does say on no uncertain terms that he agrees that the source should be kept I will back down. 3215:

Hey, I LOVE all you guys. Really, I do. My motivation has ALWAYS been to help this article not suck! Nothing personal POD. Really! And about that lollipop ... organic and sugar-free, PLEASE. Where would like me to sit? Purrrr. Purrrr. M*A*R*D*Y*K*S 18:14, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

1885:. All of these have tie-ins to interpretations of archaeological evidence and narratives about the past. Be sure to review the information in Knowledge (XXG) regarding writing about specific individuals. Tsarion has a big web presence that includes a large number of videos on 1278:

Hello! I was wondering if 'Paranthropology' (or para-anthropology) would be worthwhile... I ran across this idea and it could possibly be an emerging fringe subsection of pseudo-anthropology. However, I'm not sure if it's limited to being a journal or if there is more to it yet.

1004:

Another excellent topic! I suspect the library will be your best bet, especially given that Gass is a 19th century subject. You should look up some of the original discussions about his findings that were made at the time. (There may also be some discussion in the monograph by

1704:

Brigid Dunn, ok, I'm gonna skip over the idea of the caveman diet, there was a lot of "weight loss" info out there for following a caveman-like diet, but it was a bit difficult to narrow it down to actual historical info. Is it ok if I do the Epigraphic Society instead? Thanks

2009:) claimed it first. If they change their mind, you can do it. However, they have first dibs. I think it's a great topic, too! It's new, so I'm guessing most of the information will be online. However, you should also try to frame the discovery within a context of studies of 2687:

I would expect an astrologer to have an expertise in astrology. Given that "astrology" means western astrology, which derives ultimately from Babylon and has nothing to do with the Maya, I wouldn't argue he is an expert in the history or astrological practices of the Maya.

815:

Please sign this list (with four tildes) once you've created your Knowledge (XXG) user account. You should also add a short statement about what entry you'll be creating or working on. (You can see how your user page should appear by clicking on those of other students.)

3399:

direct attributions. I can find none. John Major Jenkins has openly stated that he never knew of Mardyks's work before publishing his idea, and yes he may be lying, but unless we can find direct evidence to the contrary (other than both having published articles in

1544:

I would like to create a page for Patrick Geryl if that is ok. I find the 2012 theory interesting, but I would like to learn more about it by researching Geryl's theories. Do you have any suggestions or specific things you would like to see on his wikipedia page?

1572:

Nathan Hutchcraft 20:48, 2 November 2010 (UTC) I seem to be having a problem uploading image files onto the website. When I try, it redirects me to a page saying that my account has been flagged to limit certain actions, including uploading files. Any ideas?

2789:(the one you refuse to have cited in this entry), that would become crystal clear. The claims being made about December 21, 2012 stem from an assignation of the values and interpretations of Western astrology--especially the psychological anthropology of 2888:

So write about that! In the context you raise, Mardyks's article constitutes a primary source and any conclusions you draw would be original research. But if there are any secondary papers which say just what you did, then they can certainly be included.

1889:. It's critical to provide a balanced perspective based on factual information. You may be challenged on his significance, so provide information that would support his inclusion in Knowledge (XXG). Models would include entries on other authors in the 2728:? (A Knowledge (XXG) entry that doesn't yet exist.) There are in fact LOTS of non-Western astrologies. Just google on "non-Western astrology" and you'll see. Astrology has nothing to do with the Maya? Try telling that to Bruce Scofield, author of 2441:), authentic Maya voices that would articulate fundamentalist Protestant Christian views, authentic Maya voices that would articulate non-religious views, and so forth. The search for an authentic, traditional, "pure" Maya view that is free of any 94:

You may have to search a bit to find good article topics that haven't already been created, but there is always work to be done in modifying and improving existing entries. There are many good sources of ideas for needed articles online.

2917:(Vol. 22). (Since it's in print, may I now take some of the points from that article and make them in Knowledge (XXG)? Or would that constitute self-promotion?) I've been enormously frustrated that an article written in Fall 2009 is 3455:

is relevant. That is, of people imagining a thought is new when it's actually something they heard or read about somewhere without knowing specifically where (a problem exacerbated in the context of co-consumption of knowledge and

1971:

I think it would be interesting to do the Vero Beach engravings, if that hasn't already been taken by someone else. Let me know if there are specific sources I should be looking at besides the three you've already provided. -Clare

856:

Professor Hoopes, I think that I am ready to go live with my article on psychic archaeology, could you take a look at it and see if I've made any mistakes or forgotten anything before I release it into Knowledge (XXG) at large?

2662:

I'm not sure what accreditation exists or does not exist for professional astrologers. As far as I know, Mardyks is an expert astrologer and has been practicing as such for at least thirty years. I'm also not clear on why

2758:

Mardyks is a western astrologer, not a Mayan one. And by the way, in case you haven't figured it out, which I'm pretty sure you have, Jimini Cricket is Mardyks; he posts under multiple names for reasons known only to him.

119:) does, too. New ones are appearing all of the time. However, it's important to choose something that is not too trivial. Meaningful topics are ones that are represented by bestselling books or that appear (as with the 3488:--"galactic alighment" is the "real" or "significant" one, and especially any assertion about the specifics of "the current galactic alignment concept," seem to me to be what's actually in the realm of original research. 1223:

Good for you! He's a fascinating and colorful character (as are many in the history of Maya archaeology). As you'll see that I've recommended to others, it's always a good idea to go to the original sources. I think

2529:

are all at work in the rich mix of culture represented by "the modern Maya," which nonetheless contains a great deal of traditional Maya culture--itself a syncretistic blend of ancient Maya beliefs and those of the

1461:

You've probably seen pictures of it. It was a supposed miniature mummy found in 1932 in San Pedro. It was found in a sitting position, and there was an x-ray taken of it, but the mummy mysteriously disappeared.

3180:. I think it's a valid request, if only after what Mardyks has put me through over that source for the last two years. I'm not entirely sure why you think I have a personal vendetta against Mardyks, Hoopes. 2267:

will be uploading the pictures so viewers can actually see a picture of Reverend Gass since pictures of him are scarce. If you see anything I could do to improve the page or add anything please let me know.

1553:. Basic biographical information is important, as well as a summary of interests, publications, and activities. Any reviews of his work should come from published sources. While his involvement in the 1528:

yeah I think I will take that topic and refine it. I have actually decided to change my Knowledge (XXG) article edit to paleopathology where I will focus on diseases that appear during the transition to

3375:

will reveal that many of the authors contributing to that magazine have subsequently played a significant role in promoting 2012 lore. If anything, the role of this publication and of the professional

1414:

I was wondering if I could change my topic to the San Pedro Mummy if no one is doing that one, I'm finding it extremely difficult to find information on the tuscan artifacts. Is it too late for this?

717:

The following entries already exist but are in need of substantial revision. If you decide to take one of these, please sign after it (with four tildes) so other students will know it's already taken.

2214:) Dr. Hoopes, I made my page live under "Pedro Mountain Mummy" since I basically revamped the entire page. If you have time could you take one last look at it and give me some feedback? Thank you. 1830:

entry. I am researching theories of the drum circle origin and would like to incorporate information on it's evolution. Do you agree on the title "Theories of Origin & Evolution" for my addition?

1395:

Great! It would be good to go back to some of the 18th and 19th century literature (when there were still discussions of the nature of thunderstones) to tell the story of their misinterpretation.

1109:

Dana Schwab---- I would like to do Forgotten Technology but I'm afraid I'll run out of things to say about Wally Wallington. Are there other forms of forgotten technology I can talk about? Thanks!

3431:

that my article "The How and Why of the Mayan End-Date in 2012 A.D." appeared (December 1994 issue)." This may be so, but Mardyks' earlier work, including both his contribution to the issue of

2825:, you'd see that it's filled with examples of Western astrology that are claimed to be relevant to interpretations of the author's life and human history as well as the Maya calendar. Academic 2477:

beliefs, but subtle elements of the latter that were added in the translation of the book from Spanish to English by self-confessed New Age scholar Robert Sitler. Another might be reportedly

2598:

if you want to check it yourself. I only obtained it a few weeks ago, but the direct quote makes it clear he was referring to a "galactic alignment" and the precession cycle before Jenkins.

1500:

No, I don't think so. What does it have to do with the theme of the course? I'm unclear on why you'd call it "Pleistocene disease" given that the transition to farming happened during the

2112:

Replied on your talk page,there was only an image link on the page which didn't work. You created it in article space but should have created it in user space. I've done that, it's now at

2978:

unreliable source." The bottom line is that there is no objective "truth" on "the very definition of an unreliable source." Astrologers may well identify Mardyks as "notable" even when

2166:

You will need a copy of Kenneth Feder, 1983, "American Disingenuous: Goodman's American Genesis -- A new chapter in cult archaeology", Skeptical Inquirer 7(4): 36-47. An excerpt is here

3460:, which specifically affects short-term memory). Is it original research just to note that Mardyks made a specific statement about the "galactic alignment" and 2012 in the pages of 3761:

Let me know if the additional references fixed the problem. I don't know why specific page numbers are needed when the topic at hand is basically the subject of the entire article.

3671:

Nice call out to Lovecraft. Don't know if it could be included in the article, but it is interesting to speculate that he may have been the originator of the "ancient aliens" meme.

2618:

is not a reliable source. Also, Mardyks is not an accredited expert in his field. That has been the issue since day one, but no one, least of all Mardyks, seems to understand this.

923:

Yes. That's a good choice, Kirby! The lessons to be learned from the effects of Josiah Priest's publications in early 19th century America are ones that shouldn't be forgotten.

1780:

Franchesca Conde - I would like to do my research on ancient drumming rituals and how some monolithic sites, like Stonehenge, may have been used and or built for this reason.

1117:

I have a copy of Wally Wallington's CD that I can bring to class tomorrow. Yes, there are other sources on "discovering" forgotten technology. I'll help you to look for them.

2421:

invention.) One might as well as for in put that reflects the views of "the Americans" or "the Europeans." The reality is that there are authentic Maya voices that represent

1613:

Okay. Why don't you query Brie on her talk page to make sure she's chosen something else and that it's okay to take this. I think it would be a good topic for someone to do.

3692:

Thanks! As a matter of fact, Jason Colavito has already written several articles and books that trace the "ancient aliens" meme to Lovecraft. I especially like his book

520:(I'll be adding more, too, as I find time.) If you decide to take one of these, please sign after it (with four tildes) so other students will know it's already taken. 2191:

I've just now read your suggestion. I still have some time to make additions to the article tomorrow. Take a look at what I have so far and let me know what you think

1549:

An interesting choice! I think you'll get the best ideas for this entry by looking at entries that have been created for other authors identified as contributors to

1496:

if that is alright. I will discuss the transition to farming and the diseases that were spread based on contact with domesticated animals. Would that be an ok topic?

2070:

Brigid Dunn Hey Dr. Hoopes, could you take a look at my epigraphy society page and maybe suggest some other topics to cover on the page, i feel stuck... thanks

1153:

represents would be in order. That is, does "the caveman diet" represent good archaeological interpretation or gimmicky sale hype? (Or a combination of both?)

1000:

I was very interested in Jacob Gass and his findings, I know the Library is a great resources, but can you think of any other resources I might be able to use?

2864:, including his recent article about the "Maya prophesy phenomenon," (Campion 2011) before you make any further decisions about what's relevant and what's not 2646:"It was the winner of the 1999 and 2000 Spica Awards for Best Astrology Publication and is widely acknowledged as the world's premiere astrology magazine." 2329: 1078:

Thanks! He's an important figure. Note that most of his work in South America was very high quality. Even great archaeologists can sometimes be wrong...

3638: 3310:

makes it clear that the early 1990s were a critical period for the growth and spread of specific ideas about 2012, most of which have a basis in popular

2801:)--onto elements of what's known about the ancient Maya calendar. If you read my recent article (Hoopes 2011), you'll see that the influence runs from 1808:

Okay, but what would the Knowledge (XXG) entry be? Would you be creating a new entry or addition to an existing one? Would it be an addition to the

438: 2469:

author Gaspar Pedro González (2010). However, the multiple layers of syncretism in this work include not only González' use of both contemporary

1589: 3480:"galactic alignment" to the attention of both the "Harmonic Convergence" community (if we can assume that's meaningful) and the English-speaking 3403:, which is, as you say, a very widely read and notable astrological publication) to give such credit to Mardyks constitutes original research. 1557:

is important, Geryl's interests have gone far beyond that. Be sure to be aware of Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines for writing about individuals.

2078: 1865:

Nice choice! Since it's a new entry, I think it should provide biographical data as well as discussing his specific theories. A section on

3007:

one or more other scholars... Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for checking the facts, or with no editorial oversight.

2244:

i am trying to insert a reference in order to define a term in my notes section and it doesn't seem to be working, what am i doing wrong?

1517: 2366: 528:

Note that others that may be relevant and appropriate can be found in the "Index of Names" that begins on p. 393 of Stephen Willams' book

2783:

have written is so important for understanding both its history and current manifestation. If you were to read Mardyks' 1991 article in

2044:) Dr. Hoopes, I was wondering if you could take a look at my talk page and see my latest update and make any notes you deem necessary. 974:. Do note that this book was published in 1991. You'll want to make your entry up-to-date by consulting some more recent publications. 3782: 3733: 3678: 3619: 3561: 3509: 3410: 3293: 3241: 3223: 3195: 3120: 3039: 3015: 2955: 2896: 2766: 2695: 2625: 2578: 2406: 1831: 1761: 2170: 1013:. You can also use the Web, of course, and perhaps write to the local historical society in Davenport, Iowa for some recommendations. 3582:

and facts about quotes from notable publications and the dates when they were published do not involve making any assumptions at all.

2375:(also known as "chia") over the addition of content relating to the plant's use in Mesoamerica. Would you mind giving your opinion at 1812:

entry, such as a section on "Ancient drumming sites" or "Theories of ancient drumming", or something else? You need to let me know.

2544:

The best way to have input of the modern Maya in Knowledge (XXG) is to encourage them to participate in the editing of this article.

2430: 2829:

scholars don't buy the connections between the two, but that doesn't mean the assertion of a connection is not central to the 2012

1149:

hunter/gatherer lifestyles than living in caves. Is there an entry on "the caveman diet"? Some critical thinking about what it

139: 2174: 3631: 1989: 1796: 1659: 1104: 750: 208: 3155:

the issue here. What matters is that a clear reference to the "galactic alignment" theory appeared in a major publication on

677:

A Knowledge (XXG) entry with a balanced perspective would be helpful. Note that objects such as this have precedents in the

3255:

What happens? He's happy? If you don't have a personal vendetta against him, I don't know why you'd be opposed to that. The

1955:

Okay! You might also comment on how continued reference to the myth also revealed things about the societies that used it.

1508:? That entry has a section on "Historical development of zoonotic diseases" that could use some expansion and improvement. 3336:(he later published his own articles about 2012 in that magazine), cites Mardyks' 1991 article in his own influential book 942:

I would like to cover the Tucson Artifacts. These are fascinating discoveries and the explanations are quite intriguing.

827:) 03:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC) Knowledge (XXG) has no page for Psychic Archaeology, would this be an acceptable project? - 3726:

be cited. I tried using one of your cited texts but she's demanding line and word. So please can you get her off my back?

2489:(1986), influenced by earlier ideas from Yucatec philosopher Domingo Martínez, whose work (which discusses the concept of 1431: 1310:

Jason Randall here, still trying to pick an area to research for the paper, will pick topic this weekend and update post.

958: 674: 603: 3188:; that I can assure you. He has them against many people. But I bear him no grudge. I just wish he would leave me alone. 3001: 1443:

No, you can change your topic if you like. (And someone else can try the Tucson Artifacts.) What's the San Pedro Mummy?

670: 666: 1951:

I would like to edit the entry on the Amazon and add a section about what the Myth reveals about Ancient Greek Society.

3427:, John Major Jenkins says, "I first became aware of Mardyks' work when an article of his appeared in the same issue of 2779:

That's right! However, Western astrology--NOT Mayan astrology--is what's behind the 2012 phenomenon. That's why what

2283:

properly show my references it would be appreciated, as I have tried several different ways with no success. Thank you

1672: 1585: 1537: 258: 3133:

Thanks. I appreciate your willingness to reconsider. If you look at the many Knowledge (XXG) entries that pertain to

3306:

On what grounds are you claiming that Mardyks' ideas "have had no wider impact"? The Knowledge (XXG) article on the

2923: 624:

such as those sites (many of which have been altered or destroyed ) that were described in the 1894 publication by

81: 76: 71: 59: 38: 1764:? You need to specify the page on which you plan to work. (I'll put some additional comments on your talk page.) 3380:

community in promoting the 2012 phenomenon has been underrepresented. This is not an issue of giving voice to a

3344:

in the area of astrology, why do you think Mardyks' article had little impact? The reality is that many of the

1690:

I was wondering if you could tell me if I published it correctly because I'm not sure if I finalized it. Thanks.

3502:

But what makes Mardyks more worthy of mention than any other pre-Jenkins appearance of the galactic alignment?

2725: 2113: 1336:

I would like to research the Holly Oak Gorget. Could you point me toward a good place to dig for information?

912: 161: 3032:

astrological degree or anything like established criteria for astrological training standards or peer review!

1521: 765: 3332: 3147: 3059: 2973:

opinion that an "astrological publication is the very definition of an unreliable source," that's definitely

2785: 2665: 2640: 2614: 2594: 1835: 3784: 3735: 3680: 3623: 3563: 3511: 3412: 3295: 3243: 3227: 3197: 3122: 3041: 3017: 2957: 2898: 2768: 2697: 2627: 2580: 2408: 2006: 805: 686: 456: 384: 3615: 3271:

sources. The rationale that's been followed for including some and excluding others remains unclear to me.

3219: 2247: 2217: 2047: 1977: 1784: 1647: 1577: 1419: 1070: 946: 591: 420: 1581: 1533: 779: 759: 442: 254: 1493: 3466:

All that's being credited is the fact that he actually published what he published when he published it.

2478: 2434: 2384: 2376: 1921: 1874: 1367: 1329: 1284: 1254: 1230: 738: 554: 328: 286: 802:

You may also find topics needing cleanup, revision, or other improvement listed on the following page:

3646: 3323: 3319: 2798: 2732:(1991). Whether Mardyks is an expert in the history or astrological practices of the Maya--that is, 2351: 2182: 2136: 2121: 1944: 1858: 1384: 1212: 1033: 464: 450: 230: 3384:

but of correctly identifying the significant role of popular astrology with respect to this topic.

2814: 2733: 2592:

I think credit should go where credit is deserved. I can send you a PDF of Mardyks' 1991 article in

2547:

latter may provide the most "traditional" or "authentic" input, but they are also the ones who seem

2466: 1861:. I would imagine for the purpose of this class it would emphasize his theories regarding Atlantis? 3372: 2241: 1985: 1913: 1792: 1695: 1655: 1640: 1635:) 04:34, 25 October 2010 (UTC) Megan Allen I will do mine on Samuel Kirkland Lothrop if that is ok. 1632: 1097: 908: 887: 784: 640: 544: 396: 356: 342: 314: 216: 157: 3777: 3775:

Personally, I thought things were OK before :) But that should keep her happy. I hope. Thanks :)

3728: 3673: 3556: 3504: 3405: 3327: 3288: 3236: 3190: 3160: 3115: 3034: 3010: 2950: 2891: 2822: 2761: 2690: 2620: 2573: 2401: 2318: 2311: 2259: 2229: 2102: 2002: 1850: 1827: 1710: 1138: 1064: 993: 682: 492: 380: 370: 272: 203: 189: 484: 3363:

From what I can tell, Mardyks was the first to publish on 2012 and the "galactic alignment" in

673:. The latest word is that the Smithsonian "does not dispute the authenticity" of this object. 3138: 3091: 2721: 2717: 2211: 2196: 2151: 2041: 1878: 1748: 1427: 1225: 954: 895: 862: 832: 824: 792: 599: 414: 300: 147: 3476:) to "world attention," but it seems to be an undeniable fact that he did bring the issue of 2207: 2037: 1458: 1411: 939: 3766: 3752: 3704: 3660: 3587: 3544: 3493: 3447:

milieus within which Jenkins was operating. Jenkins also writes, "In Appendix 1 of my book

3389: 3354: 3276: 3167: 3103: 3072: 2991: 2933: 2869: 2861: 2806: 2749: 2678: 2653: 2603: 2556: 2380: 2371: 2086: 2060: 2026: 1960: 1929: 1898: 1817: 1769: 1733: 1680: 1618: 1562: 1513: 1485: 1469: 1448: 1400: 1363: 1353: 1325: 1298: 1280: 1269: 1250: 1239: 1219:

I Would like to do my assignment on Guillermo Dupaix. Any suggestions for research? Thanks!

1197: 1173: 1158: 1122: 1083: 1049: 1018: 979: 928: 876: 847: 775: 478: 324: 282: 244: 47: 17: 3177: 2648:

Don't you see a contradiction there? Will you be editing that entry for erroneous claims?

665:- this artifact, found in June 2009, has been referred as the "oldest art in the Americas" 3723: 3642: 3435:

that appeared around the time of the Harmonic Convergence in 1987 and his 1991 article in

3307: 3256: 3054: 2910: 2852: 2844: 2810: 2802: 2737: 2713: 2347: 2291: 2275: 2178: 2159: 2132: 2117: 2014: 1940: 1882: 1609:

If Brie does not want to take on the Tuscan artifacts, I would like to take a shot at it.

1602: 1554: 1380: 1315: 1208: 1029: 460: 446: 226: 175: 120: 1756:-'the mystery of the olmecs'- as a reference on the page, so i thought that may work...? 2839: 1115:

You need to sign your post with four tildes so that I can have a link to your talk page.

743: 3381: 3264: 2857: 2851:

on the "Timewave Zero" model. So what if Jimini Cricket is Mardyks? He could be the

2848: 2526: 2167: 1981: 1909: 1788: 1691: 1651: 1636: 1628: 1093: 675:

http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2010/oct/20/smithsonian-does-not-dispute-authenticity-of-in/

620:

Note: Also acceptable would be entries on archaeological sites formerly attributed to

392: 352: 338: 310: 212: 3464:, a notable astrological publication, prior to any mention of the subject by Jenkins? 2143:

I was wondering if you could take a look at my talk page and see how it looks so far.

671:

http://blogs.ngm.com/blog_central/2009/06/mammoth-art-in-america-or-mammoth-fraud.html

667:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/06/090610-oldest-art-mammoth-picture.html

3268: 3234:

I hope you see now Hoopes, this is what happens when you give Mardyks what he wants.

3134: 3087: 2255: 2225: 2098: 2071: 1846: 1706: 1550: 1134: 1060: 989: 732: 656: 621: 512:

of the entries that I would like to see created (in red) and/or improved (in blue).

488: 366: 268: 199: 185: 124: 2298:

Professor, I have fixed my referencing errors and the final product can be found at

1720:

Yes, Brigid. An entry on the Epigraphic Society would be good. The main website is

3719: 3522:

One principal quality that in academia and especially in history counts for a lot:

3452: 2794: 2736:--is irrelevant. He represents astrological practices and beliefs relevant to the 2518: 2442: 2192: 2147: 2018: 1744: 1423: 1293:

I wish I could say, but I don't know what it is. Could you tell me a little more?

1006: 950: 891: 858: 828: 820: 728: 722: 632: 625: 595: 410: 296: 143: 2299: 1348:(I can't remember the specific citation) and use primary soures whenever you can. 1067:) I am going to do my wiki project on Philip Ainsworth Means if that's alright! 1044:

Good choice! It's a fascinating site and one that's attracted a lot of interest.

111:) has regular discussions of hot topics in debates about pseudoarchaeology. The 3790: 3770: 3762: 3756: 3748: 3741: 3708: 3700: 3686: 3656: 3650: 3591: 3583: 3569: 3548: 3540: 3517: 3497: 3489: 3418: 3393: 3385: 3358: 3350: 3301: 3280: 3272: 3249: 3203: 3171: 3163: 3128: 3107: 3099: 3076: 3068: 3047: 3023: 2995: 2987: 2963: 2937: 2929: 2904: 2873: 2865: 2774: 2753: 2745: 2703: 2682: 2674: 2657: 2649: 2644:

is not a reliable source, the current Knowledge (XXG) article on it notes that,

2633: 2607: 2599: 2586: 2560: 2552: 2535: 2514: 2506: 2498: 2494: 2446: 2414: 2388: 2355: 2325: 2295: 2279: 2263: 2233: 2200: 2186: 2155: 2140: 2125: 2106: 2090: 2082: 2064: 2056: 2030: 2022: 2010: 1993: 1964: 1956: 1948: 1933: 1925: 1902: 1894: 1869:

would be nice, but there are many other things he has addressed, among them the

1854: 1839: 1821: 1813: 1800: 1773: 1765: 1752: 1737: 1729: 1714: 1699: 1684: 1676: 1663: 1622: 1614: 1606: 1566: 1558: 1541: 1525: 1509: 1489: 1481: 1473: 1465: 1452: 1444: 1435: 1404: 1396: 1388: 1371: 1357: 1349: 1333: 1319: 1302: 1294: 1288: 1273: 1265: 1258: 1243: 1235: 1216: 1201: 1193: 1177: 1169: 1162: 1154: 1142: 1126: 1118: 1101: 1087: 1079: 1053: 1045: 1037: 1022: 1014: 997: 983: 975: 962: 932: 924: 916: 899: 880: 872: 866: 851: 843: 836: 796: 690: 607: 474: 424: 400: 240: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1344:, which should provide some basic references. Be sure to go to the article in 778:- entry could use some more biographical information and link to a new page on 725:- entry on this important archaeologist could use major revisions and additions 135:

If you have picked the entry on which you'll be working, you may list it here.

2909:

I have and am still doing so! The article of mine (Hoopes 2011) cited in the

2741: 2287: 2271: 1725: 1598: 1311: 1185: 171: 2986:

standards you are using for defining "reliability" and "notability"? Thanks!

2913:

entry represents that, as does a double book review published in the journal

1504:. Why not tackle some of the controversies over archaeological evidence for 3481: 3444: 3377: 3311: 3156: 3082: 3053:

Please refer to editor Dougweller's comments on the discussion page for the

2830: 2709: 2670: 2510: 1180:

I would like to do my page on the concept: Science of Unitary Human Beings.

3424: 1857:

I would like to use one of your suggested topics and create a Wikipage for

2712:" means Western astrology? Not according to Knowledge (XXG)! What about 3457: 3057:

entry. There is no doubt whatsoever that Mardyks wrote what he wrote in

2826: 2790: 2490: 2470: 2438: 2426: 1866: 1671:

That's a good choice. Be sure to comment on his research concerning the

1505: 1501: 1464:

San Pedro where? (There are a number of them.) Can you give me a link?

762:- monument attributed with prophetic symbolism; needs more complete entry 470: 768:- entry needs section about his writings on ancient peoples (especially 3694:

The Cult of Alien Gods: H.P. Lovecraft and Extraterrestrial Pop Culture

3440: 3345: 2539: 2522: 2502: 2474: 2422: 2337: 1890: 806:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Pages_needing_attention/Pseudoscience

788: 769: 1916:) I'd like to use one of your suggested persons: Alberto Ruz Buenfil. 3368: 3260: 3142: 3095: 2531: 1870: 3151:

are frequently cited. Whether Mardyks himself is notable or not is

970:

I like it! You'll find a lot on this subject in Stephen Williams'

2724:? (Will you be deleting those Knowledge (XXG) entries?) How about 2369:, and have some knowledge in that area. I'm in an edit dispute at 1040:

Working on Dwarka, the submerged city off the west coast of India

3086:

a legitimate subject of scholarly inquiry. The same is true for

530:

Fantastic Archaeology: The Wild Side of North American Prehistory

1809: 587:-Canadian archaeologist who "pioneered Intuitive Archaeology." 116: 3697: 1362:

Professor Hoopes, I think I'm ready to go live with my article.

3468:

I don't think there's any implication at all that he brought "

25: 1920:

Cool beans! Be sure to link back to the entry on his father

2813:. None of that is Maya, so there is no reason to privilege 2455:

modern Maya" but you may find some examples of the views of

2332:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2310: 1721: 669:. However, it has also been questioned as a possible fraud 635:- archaeological site near Heidelberg (see Ch. 7, p. 167 in 2097:

Thanks just thought I would let you know. See you tomorrow

871:

Yep. I'll have a look at it and leave some comments soon.

543:. (He's not yet one of the George Carters listed on the 541:

Earlier Than You Think: A Personal View of Man in America

2730:

Day Signs: Native American Astrology from Ancient Mexico

2169:. If he's an academic, you need to meet the criteria at 108: 2344: 659:. Also known as the "Niven tablets" or "Niven stones". 2982:

don't. Can you please point me to information on the

1886: 3534:(1987) are not as clear as what Mardyks published in 735:) - could used more descriptive detail and evaluation 2819:

Tzolkin: Visionary Perspectives and Calendar Studies

1264:

Hi Emily! Do you have any ideas about a topic yet?

1184:

Cool! You'll find some good leads in the article by

2300:

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Vunil/Tucson_artifacts

3637:Is this abandoned? See the discussion about it at 2833:. It is! The assertions about astrology--mostly 1760:Hi Max. When you say "another page", do you mean 3526:. The brief, oblique, and imprecise mentions in 3318:in Maya studies). Mardyks was an acquaintance of 2921:not in print. Hopefully, it will appear soon in 655:- engraved objects claimed to have been found by 3696:(Prometheus Books, 2005). Check out his blog at 3474:as if there was just one or even a "correct" one 3081:Furthermore, your statements above suggest that 2673:. It's not as if that's an academic discipline! 2669:would not be a reliable source for professional 1009:. There are also some good sources mentioned in 919:I plan on doing Josiah Priest. Is that alright? 514:Please feel free to add additional entries that 3639:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Ancient Egypt 3371:and especially the index of previous articles 3159:years before it was first mentioned by writer 2399:reflect the views of the modern Maya on 2012? 705:of Indian revisionism - see Ch. 9 (p. 217) in 747:(1969). Needs more biographical information. 8: 2924:2012: Decoding the Counterculture Apocalypse 2485:(1990), a translation by New Age writers of 2463:13 B'aktun: Mayan Visions of 2012 and Beyond 2250:comment added 14:21, 5 November 2010 (UTC). 2220:comment added 23:42, 3 November 2010 (UTC). 2050:comment added 18:25, 31 October 2010 (UTC). 1391:I'd like to work on the thunderstone page. 1073:comment added 01:54, 20 October 2010 (UTC). 842:Thanks, Levi. This is an excellent topic! 3747:No problem. What information do you need? 2449:fantasy. You will not find "the views of 1924:(which could use some enhancing itself). 1826:I would like to create an addition to the 753:- more complete entry needed on author of 2317:Hello, Hoopes. You have new messages at 2237:having to listen and read his craziness) 2158:I am going to do my wikipedia article on 3094:, both of which rely upon references to 2817:in the discussion. If you were to read 2365:Hi, I see that you are a participant at 639:); this will require an addition to the 539:- 20th century archaeologist; author of 439:Marine archaeology in the Gulf of Cambay 3574:I understand. However, Knowledge (XXG) 3145:literature and publications similar to 2551:likely to contribute. It's a problem. 433:Articles for Revision (Already Claimed) 3667:Read your article in the Fortean Times 3484:community. Any arbitration of which-- 3367:. A visit to that magazine's website 3326:. Prominent 2012 phenomenon proponent 2969:Yes, it does get tricky. While it is 2171:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (academics) 2055:Thanks for letting me know. Will do. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3439:, were probably known to many in the 1192:. Be sure to check primary sources! 7: 3722:is demanding something you wrote in 2425:views (including ones who reference 2571:Why are you giving Mardyks credit? 2175:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people) 2001:Sorry, according to the timestamp, 1762:Pre-Columbian trans-oceanic contact 2493:, for example) in turn references 2461:modern Maya. One example would be 1340:Sure! Check out the discussion in 581:-Author and psychic archaeologist. 24: 3330:, who was presumably a reader of 3259:article has cited many different 2483:Secrets of Mayan Science/Religion 755:Lost Tribes and Sunken Continents 2346:- I can see why it was deleted. 1643:) 04:33, 25 October 2010 (UTC) 795:; claims to be reincarnation of 29: 3632:User:EvanyEmlins/Gosford Glyphs 2809:and concepts pertaining to the 1724:Be sure to review the entry on 751:Robert Wauchope (archaeologist) 237:Science of Unitary Human Beings 3250:19:02, 30 September 2011 (UTC) 3204:09:03, 29 September 2011 (UTC) 3172:06:37, 29 September 2011 (UTC) 3129:06:32, 29 September 2011 (UTC) 3108:06:13, 29 September 2011 (UTC) 3077:06:10, 29 September 2011 (UTC) 3048:06:00, 29 September 2011 (UTC) 3024:21:41, 22 September 2011 (UTC) 2996:17:23, 22 September 2011 (UTC) 2964:16:55, 22 September 2011 (UTC) 2938:15:21, 22 September 2011 (UTC) 2905:08:13, 22 September 2011 (UTC) 2874:05:32, 22 September 2011 (UTC) 2797:(who was a personal mentor to 2775:20:19, 21 September 2011 (UTC) 2754:05:08, 20 September 2011 (UTC) 2704:08:00, 19 September 2011 (UTC) 2683:02:18, 18 September 2011 (UTC) 2658:05:40, 22 September 2011 (UTC) 2634:06:47, 15 September 2011 (UTC) 2608:20:02, 13 September 2011 (UTC) 2587:17:58, 13 September 2011 (UTC) 2561:04:55, 20 September 2011 (UTC) 2415:16:00, 19 September 2011 (UTC) 1516:) 17:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC) 1: 3322:and participated in the 1987 2437:, and the like--representing 2356:14:02, 25 December 2010 (UTC) 2326:17:56, 24 November 2010 (UTC) 131:New Entries (Already Claimed) 117:http://www.badarchaeology.net 3709:22:23, 7 February 2012 (UTC) 3698:http://www.jasoncolavito.com 3687:18:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC) 3651:17:21, 3 November 2011 (UTC) 2843:were central to the work of 2296:22:25, 5 November 2010 (UTC) 2280:22:05, 5 November 2010 (UTC) 2264:21:37, 5 November 2010 (UTC) 2234:02:24, 4 November 2010 (UTC) 2201:07:05, 5 November 2010 (UTC) 2187:18:35, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 2156:17:41, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 2141:05:23, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 2126:17:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 2107:03:09, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 2091:21:15, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 2065:00:33, 1 November 2010 (UTC) 2031:00:33, 1 November 2010 (UTC) 1994:19:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC) 1965:01:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC) 1949:16:11, 28 October 2010 (UTC) 1934:01:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC) 1903:17:50, 27 October 2010 (UTC) 1855:01:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC) 1840:21:06, 1 November 2010 (UTC) 1822:17:50, 27 October 2010 (UTC) 1801:23:51, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 1774:20:19, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 1753:04:14, 25 October 2010 (UTC) 1738:20:38, 25 October 2010 (UTC) 1715:14:59, 25 October 2010 (UTC) 1700:11:26, 5 November 2010 (UTC) 1685:13:27, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 1664:04:27, 25 October 2010 (UTC) 1623:20:35, 25 October 2010 (UTC) 1607:04:14, 25 October 2010 (UTC) 1567:20:35, 25 October 2010 (UTC) 1542:23:24, 24 October 2010 (UTC) 1526:13:35, 25 October 2010 (UTC) 1490:15:42, 24 October 2010 (UTC) 1474:20:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC) 1453:17:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC) 1436:14:10, 24 October 2010 (UTC) 1405:20:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 1389:17:12, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 1372:18:15, 5 November 2010 (UTC) 1358:20:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 1334:05:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 1320:05:00, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 1303:13:22, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 1289:05:14, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 1274:19:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC) 1259:17:36, 22 October 2010 (UTC) 1244:00:08, 22 October 2010 (UTC) 1217:20:59, 21 October 2010 (UTC) 1202:00:08, 22 October 2010 (UTC) 1178:19:26, 21 October 2010 (UTC) 1163:23:46, 21 October 2010 (UTC) 1143:17:47, 21 October 2010 (UTC) 1127:23:02, 20 October 2010 (UTC) 1102:05:31, 20 October 2010 (UTC) 1088:02:07, 20 October 2010 (UTC) 1054:02:07, 20 October 2010 (UTC) 1038:00:04, 20 October 2010 (UTC) 1023:22:13, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 998:21:43, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 984:20:52, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 963:19:44, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 933:18:29, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 917:17:02, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 900:21:08, 28 October 2010 (UTC) 881:13:20, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 867:22:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC) 852:19:12, 18 October 2010 (UTC) 837:14:48, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 691:06:48, 28 October 2010 (UTC) 608:18:31, 21 October 2010 (UTC) 425:16:36, 4 November 2010 (UTC) 401:16:27, 4 November 2010 (UTC) 3592:19:40, 4 October 2011 (UTC) 3570:21:33, 3 October 2011 (UTC) 3549:21:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC) 3518:07:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC) 3498:04:51, 3 October 2011 (UTC) 3419:20:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 3394:20:48, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 3359:20:36, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 3302:19:59, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 3281:19:29, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 3067:that is readily verifiable. 1673:stone spheres of Costa Rica 3809: 3791:20:14, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 3771:20:09, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 3757:19:28, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 3742:16:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC) 3340:. Given the notability of 3184:certainly has one against 2860:by historian of astrology 2517:of various denominations, 2389:05:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 2077:Please have a look at the 2740:, which is the result of 2726:Native American astrology 2361:Neutral opinion requested 1722:http://www.epigraphy.org/ 293:San Pedro mummy (Wyoming) 2114:User:Vanvance/Jacob Gass 1492:I would like to discuss 1190:Archaeological Fantasies 787:- speculative writer on 707:Archaeological Fantasies 637:Archaeological Fantasies 3536:The Mountain Astrologer 3528:The Invisible Landscape 3462:The Mountain Astrologer 3437:The Mountain Astrologer 3401:The Mountain Astrologer 3369:The Mountain Astrologer 3365:The Mountain Astrologer 3342:The Mountain Astrologer 3333:The Mountain Astrologer 3148:The Mountain Astrologer 3060:The Mountain Astrologer 2786:The Mountain Astrologer 2666:The Mountain Astrologer 2641:The Mountain Astrologer 2615:The Mountain Astrologer 2595:The Mountain Astrologer 2367:WikiProject Mesoamerica 457:Thunderstone (folklore) 443:User:Ckolavalli///Draft 307:Samuel Kirkland Lothrop 3449:Maya Cosmogenesis 2012 3423:In his online article 3338:Maya Cosmogenesis 2012 2315: 760:Great Cross of Hendaye 573:The Atlantis Blueprint 196:Philip Ainsworth Means 3472:galactic alignment" ( 3349:"original research"? 2638:While you claim that 2525:hippies, and now the 2497:. The influences of 2487:Religión ciencia maya 2481:author Hunbatz Men's 2377:Talk:Salvia hispanica 2314: 2081:page for your entry. 1922:Alberto Ruz Lhuillier 1875:extraterrestrial life 1342:Fantastic Archaeology 1231:Antiquities of Mexico 1011:Fantastic Archaeology 972:Fantastic Archaeology 766:Eugène Viollet-le-Duc 739:Giorgio de Santillana 555:Giorgio de Santillana 391:Naacal Tablets"' by 109:http://hallofmaat.com 42:of past discussions. 3324:Harmonic Convergence 3176:I've left a post at 2319:Jsfouche's talk page 780:Forgotten technology 713:Entries for Revision 663:Vero Beach engraving 500:Possible New Entries 407:Forgotten Technology 377:Vero Beach engraving 3433:Meditation Magazine 3429:Mountain Astrologer 3425:Response to Mardyks 3002:WP:Reliable sources 2781:Western astrologers 2242:User:kirbyleekansas 2131:Britten Kuckelman: 1494:Pleistocene disease 888:Psychic archaeology 641:disambiguation page 545:disambiguation page 504:The following is a 349:Stephan A. Schwartz 335:Alberto Ruz Buenfil 140:Psychic archaeology 3715:Hoopes, I need you 3328:John Major Jenkins 3161:John Major Jenkins 3141:, you'll see that 2823:John Major Jenkins 2612:The issue is that 2330:remove this notice 2316: 1939:Britten Kuckelman 1887:http://youtube.com 1728:, who founded it. 1249:Emily Evans-Monce 1234:is calling you... 811:KU Student Authors 791:topics, including 553:- co-author, with 551:Hertha von Dechend 518:would like to see! 508:wish list of just 265:Epigraphic Society 3618:comment added by 3373:TMA Article Index 3222:comment added by 3139:pseudoarchaeology 3092:pseudoarchaeology 2722:Tibetan astrology 2718:Chinese astrology 1997: 1980:comment added by 1879:British Israelism 1804: 1787:comment added by 1667: 1650:comment added by 1594: 1582:Nathan hutchcraft 1580:comment added by 1534:Nathan hutchcraft 1439: 1422:comment added by 1226:Lord Kingsborough 1028:Chhaya Kolavalli 966: 949:comment added by 793:pseudoarchaeology 703:Debvabhasa school 611: 594:comment added by 585:J. Norman Emerson 569:When the Sky Fell 255:Nathan hutchcraft 87: 86: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3800: 3787: 3780: 3738: 3731: 3683: 3676: 3627: 3566: 3559: 3532:The Mayan Factor 3514: 3507: 3415: 3408: 3298: 3291: 3269:pseudoscientific 3246: 3239: 3231: 3200: 3193: 3125: 3118: 3044: 3037: 3020: 3013: 2960: 2953: 2915:Archaeoastronomy 2901: 2894: 2862:Nicholas Campion 2847:and his brother 2807:Helena Blavatsky 2771: 2764: 2700: 2693: 2630: 2623: 2583: 2576: 2473:scholarship and 2411: 2404: 2372:Salvia hispanica 2333: 2251: 2221: 2051: 1996: 1974: 1803: 1781: 1666: 1644: 1593: 1574: 1438: 1416: 1324:Erica Henderson 1105:Ligourio Pyramid 1074: 965: 943: 819:Levi Keach here 776:Wally Wallington 731:(also listed as 679:Holly Oak gorget 610: 588: 428: 279:Holly Oak gorget 223:Guillermo Dupaix 209:Ligourio Pyramid 168:Tucson artifacts 98: 90:Sources of Ideas 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 18:User talk:Hoopes 3808: 3807: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3799: 3798: 3797: 3785: 3778: 3736: 3729: 3724:2012 phenomenon 3717: 3681: 3674: 3669: 3635: 3613: 3564: 3557: 3512: 3505: 3413: 3406: 3308:2012 phenomenon 3296: 3289: 3257:2012 phenomenon 3244: 3237: 3217: 3198: 3191: 3123: 3116: 3055:2012 phenomenon 3042: 3035: 3018: 3011: 2984:Knowledge (XXG) 2958: 2951: 2911:2012 phenomenon 2899: 2892: 2853:Man in the Moon 2845:Terence McKenna 2811:Age of Aquarius 2769: 2762: 2738:2012 phenomenon 2714:Hindu astrology 2698: 2691: 2628: 2621: 2581: 2574: 2569: 2542:, and others. 2519:anthropologists 2409: 2402: 2396: 2363: 2341: 2334: 2323: 2308: 2245: 2240:Kirby Anderosn 2215: 2160:Jeffrey Goodman 2045: 2015:prehistoric art 1975: 1883:2012 phenomenon 1881:, and even the 1859:Michael Tsarion 1782: 1645: 1575: 1555:2012 phenomenon 1417: 1068: 1059:Hannah Kincaid 944: 907:Kirby Anderson 890:is now live. -- 813: 741:- co-author of 715: 699: 649: 618: 589: 579:Jeffrey Goodman 567:- co-author of 526: 502: 485:Antonio del Río 435: 418: 363:Michael Tsarion 133: 121:2012 phenomenon 113:Bad Archaeology 101: 92: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3806: 3804: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3759: 3716: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3668: 3665: 3634: 3629: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3572: 3361: 3320:José Argüelles 3265:counterculture 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3079: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2858:apocalypticism 2856:astrology and 2837:astrology--in 2815:Maya astrology 2803:Pierre d'Ailly 2799:José Argüelles 2734:Maya astrology 2660: 2568: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2527:World Wide Web 2431:crystal skulls 2395: 2392: 2362: 2359: 2340: 2335: 2324:Message added 2322: 2309: 2307: 2304: 2286:Jason Randall 2270:Jason Randall 2204: 2203: 2189: 2173:, if not, see 2129: 2128: 2094: 2093: 2068: 2067: 2034: 2033: 1968: 1967: 1937: 1936: 1906: 1905: 1843: 1842: 1824: 1779: 1777: 1776: 1741: 1740: 1688: 1687: 1626: 1625: 1597:Jason Randall 1570: 1569: 1531: 1530: 1518:99.191.255.199 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1462: 1408: 1407: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1276: 1247: 1246: 1207:Robby Proctor 1205: 1204: 1168:Adrienne Birt 1166: 1165: 1130: 1129: 1091: 1090: 1057: 1056: 1026: 1025: 987: 986: 936: 935: 909:Kirbyleekansas 905: 904: 903: 902: 885: 884: 883: 812: 809: 800: 799: 782: 773: 763: 757: 748: 736: 726: 714: 711: 710: 709: 698: 695: 694: 693: 660: 653:Naacal Tablets 648: 645: 644: 643: 617: 614: 613: 612: 582: 576: 562: 548: 525: 522: 501: 498: 497: 496: 482: 468: 454: 434: 431: 430: 429: 423:comment added 404: 388: 374: 360: 346: 332: 321:Gosford Glyphs 318: 304: 290: 276: 262: 248: 234: 220: 206: 193: 179: 165: 158:Kirbyleekansas 151: 132: 129: 125:Internet memes 100: 97: 91: 88: 85: 84: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3805: 3792: 3789: 3788: 3783: 3781: 3774: 3773: 3772: 3768: 3764: 3760: 3758: 3754: 3750: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3743: 3740: 3739: 3734: 3732: 3725: 3721: 3714: 3710: 3706: 3702: 3699: 3695: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3685: 3684: 3679: 3677: 3666: 3664: 3662: 3658: 3653: 3652: 3648: 3644: 3640: 3633: 3630: 3628: 3625: 3621: 3620:69.247.77.234 3617: 3593: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3571: 3568: 3567: 3562: 3560: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3546: 3542: 3537: 3533: 3529: 3525: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3516: 3515: 3510: 3508: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3495: 3491: 3487: 3483: 3479: 3475: 3471: 3467: 3463: 3459: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3417: 3416: 3411: 3409: 3402: 3397: 3396: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3379: 3374: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3347: 3343: 3339: 3335: 3334: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3300: 3299: 3294: 3292: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3258: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3248: 3247: 3242: 3240: 3232: 3229: 3225: 3224:69.247.77.234 3221: 3205: 3202: 3201: 3196: 3194: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3149: 3144: 3140: 3136: 3135:pseudoscience 3132: 3131: 3130: 3127: 3126: 3121: 3119: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3088:pseudoscience 3084: 3080: 3078: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3061: 3056: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3046: 3045: 3040: 3038: 3025: 3022: 3021: 3016: 3014: 3008: 3003: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2962: 2961: 2956: 2954: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2926: 2925: 2920: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2903: 2902: 2897: 2895: 2887: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2841: 2840:Hamlet's Mill 2836: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2787: 2782: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2773: 2772: 2767: 2765: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2702: 2701: 2696: 2694: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2667: 2661: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2642: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2632: 2631: 2626: 2624: 2617: 2616: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2596: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2585: 2584: 2579: 2577: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2536:Teotihuacanos 2533: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2459: 2454: 2453: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2413: 2412: 2407: 2405: 2393: 2391: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2379:? Thank you, 2378: 2374: 2373: 2368: 2360: 2358: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2339: 2336: 2331: 2327: 2320: 2313: 2305: 2303: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2284: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2268: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2252: 2249: 2243: 2238: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2222: 2219: 2213: 2209: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2146:Justin Klaas 2144: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2049: 2043: 2039: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2017:, as well as 2016: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2003:Larsonjayhawk 2000: 1999: 1998: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1973: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1915: 1911: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1832:70.94.218.175 1829: 1825: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1739: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1702: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1551:pseudoscience 1548: 1547: 1546: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1460: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1413: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1322: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1277: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1232: 1227: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1107: 1106: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1072: 1066: 1062: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1003: 1002: 1001: 999: 995: 991: 985: 981: 977: 973: 969: 968: 967: 964: 960: 956: 952: 948: 941: 934: 930: 926: 922: 921: 920: 918: 914: 910: 901: 897: 893: 889: 886: 882: 878: 874: 870: 869: 868: 864: 860: 855: 854: 853: 849: 845: 841: 840: 839: 838: 834: 830: 826: 822: 817: 810: 808: 807: 803: 798: 794: 790: 786: 785:David Wilcock 783: 781: 777: 774: 771: 767: 764: 761: 758: 756: 752: 749: 746: 745: 744:Hamlet's Mill 740: 737: 734: 733:Jungfrau Park 730: 727: 724: 721: 720: 719: 712: 708: 704: 701: 700: 697:Organizations 696: 692: 688: 684: 683:Larsonjayhawk 680: 676: 672: 668: 664: 661: 658: 657:William Niven 654: 651: 650: 646: 642: 638: 634: 631: 630: 629: 627: 623: 622:Moundbuilders 615: 609: 605: 601: 597: 593: 586: 583: 580: 577: 574: 570: 566: 565:Rand Flem-Ath 563: 560: 559:Hamlet's Mill 556: 552: 549: 546: 542: 538: 537:George Carter 535: 534: 533: 531: 523: 521: 519: 517: 511: 507: 499: 494: 490: 486: 483: 480: 476: 472: 469: 466: 462: 458: 455: 452: 448: 444: 440: 437: 436: 432: 426: 422: 416: 412: 408: 405: 403: 402: 398: 394: 389: 386: 382: 381:Larsonjayhawk 378: 375: 372: 368: 364: 361: 358: 354: 350: 347: 344: 340: 336: 333: 330: 326: 322: 319: 316: 312: 308: 305: 302: 298: 294: 291: 288: 284: 280: 277: 274: 270: 266: 263: 260: 256: 252: 251:Patrick Geryl 249: 246: 242: 238: 235: 232: 228: 224: 221: 218: 214: 210: 207: 205: 201: 197: 194: 191: 187: 183: 180: 177: 173: 169: 166: 163: 159: 155: 154:Josiah Priest 152: 149: 145: 141: 138: 137: 136: 130: 128: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 106: 105:Hall of Ma'at 99:Hall of Ma'at 96: 89: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3776: 3727: 3720:User:Mercy11 3718: 3693: 3672: 3670: 3655:I'll check. 3654: 3636: 3614:— Preceding 3610: 3579: 3575: 3555: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3523: 3503: 3485: 3482:astrological 3477: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3461: 3453:cryptomnesia 3448: 3436: 3432: 3428: 3404: 3400: 3364: 3341: 3337: 3331: 3315: 3287: 3235: 3233: 3218:— Preceding 3214: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3152: 3146: 3114: 3064: 3058: 3033: 3030: 3009: 3005: 2983: 2979: 2974: 2970: 2949: 2946: 2928:would help. 2922: 2918: 2914: 2890: 2838: 2834: 2818: 2795:Dane Rudhyar 2784: 2780: 2760: 2729: 2689: 2664: 2645: 2639: 2619: 2613: 2593: 2572: 2570: 2548: 2543: 2511:Theosophists 2486: 2482: 2462: 2457: 2456: 2451: 2450: 2400: 2397: 2370: 2364: 2342: 2285: 2269: 2254:Andrew Vance 2253: 2239: 2223: 2205: 2145: 2130: 2095: 2069: 2035: 2019:Paleoindians 1969: 1938: 1908:Alison King 1907: 1844: 1778: 1742: 1703: 1689: 1627: 1596: 1571: 1532: 1480: 1409: 1378: 1345: 1341: 1323: 1309: 1248: 1229: 1206: 1189: 1167: 1150: 1131: 1114: 1108: 1092: 1058: 1027: 1010: 1007:Cyrus Thomas 988: 971: 937: 906: 818: 814: 804: 801: 754: 742: 729:Mystery Park 723:Cyrus Thomas 716: 706: 702: 678: 662: 652: 636: 633:Heiligenberg 626:Cyrus Thomas 619: 584: 578: 572: 568: 564: 558: 550: 540: 536: 529: 527: 515: 513: 509: 505: 503: 406: 390: 376: 362: 348: 334: 320: 306: 292: 278: 264: 250: 236: 222: 195: 181: 167: 153: 134: 112: 104: 102: 93: 65: 43: 37: 3530:(1975) and 3098:literature 2515:Protestants 2499:Franciscans 2495:Freemasonry 2394:Modern Maya 2381:First Light 2246:—Preceding 2224:Sam Crooks 2216:—Preceding 2206:Brie Wight 2046:—Preceding 2036:Brie Wight 2011:Paleolithic 1976:—Preceding 1845:Sam Crooks 1828:Drum Circle 1783:—Preceding 1743:Max Wescoe 1646:—Preceding 1576:—Preceding 1457:Brie Wight 1418:—Preceding 1410:Brie Wight 1379:Jacob White 1364:HendersonEL 1326:HendersonEL 1281:EvanyEmlins 1251:EvanyEmlins 1069:—Preceding 945:—Preceding 938:Brie Wight 797:Edgar Cayce 590:—Preceding 524:Individuals 419:—Preceding 325:EvanyEmlins 283:HendersonEL 36:This is an 3643:Dougweller 3641:. Thanks. 2821:(1994) by 2742:syncretism 2567:Uh, Hoopes 2507:Freemasons 2443:syncretism 2348:Dougweller 2328:. You can 2179:Dougweller 2133:Britkuckel 2118:Dougweller 1941:Britkuckel 1726:Barry Fell 1381:Jacobwhite 1209:RobProctor 1186:Alan Sokal 1113:Hi Dana. 1030:Ckolavalli 461:Jacobwhite 447:Ckolavalli 227:RobProctor 182:Jacob Gass 3445:astrology 3378:astrology 3312:astrology 3157:astrology 3083:astrology 2710:Astrology 2671:astrology 2467:Q'anjobal 1982:Cjordan89 1910:Alison.ek 1789:Fconde108 1692:Jhawkfan1 1652:Jhawkfan1 1637:Jhawkfan1 1629:Jhawkfan1 1094:Jmlies721 393:Cjordan89 353:Stephrobs 339:Alison.ek 311:Jhawkfan1 213:Jmlies721 123:as major 115:website ( 107:website ( 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 3616:unsigned 3524:Priority 3458:cannabis 3220:unsigned 2827:Mayanist 2791:Alan Leo 2491:Hunab Ku 2471:Mayanist 2447:Romantic 2439:Mayanism 2427:Atlantis 2306:Talkback 2256:Vanvance 2226:Sgcrooks 2099:Vanvance 2072:brigidsu 1990:contribs 1978:unsigned 1893:genre. 1867:Atlantis 1847:Sgcrooks 1797:contribs 1785:unsigned 1707:Brigidsu 1660:contribs 1648:unsigned 1590:contribs 1578:unsigned 1529:farming. 1506:Zoonosis 1502:Holocene 1432:contribs 1420:unsigned 1135:Brigidsu 1061:Hkincaid 990:Vanvance 959:contribs 947:unsigned 604:contribs 592:unsigned 489:Gorhan21 471:Zoonosis 367:Sgcrooks 269:Brigidsu 200:Hkincaid 186:Vanvance 3779:Serendi 3730:Serendi 3675:Serendi 3578:report 3558:Serendi 3506:Serendi 3441:New Age 3407:Serendi 3346:New Age 3290:Serendi 3238:Serendi 3192:Serendi 3117:Serendi 3036:Serendi 3012:Serendi 2952:Serendi 2893:Serendi 2835:Western 2763:Serendi 2692:Serendi 2622:Serendi 2575:Serendi 2540:Toltecs 2523:New Age 2503:Jesuits 2479:Yucatec 2475:New Age 2423:New Age 2403:Serendi 2338:Amazons 2302:thanks 2248:undated 2218:undated 2208:bri3jor 2193:Klsmn22 2148:Klsmn22 2048:undated 2038:bri3jor 1891:New Age 1745:mwescoe 1459:bri3jor 1424:Bri3jor 1412:bri3jor 1346:Science 1071:undated 951:Bri3jor 940:bri3jor 892:LeviK3a 859:LeviK3a 829:LeviK3a 821:LeviK3a 789:New Age 770:Toltecs 647:Objects 596:LeviK3a 561:(1969). 506:partial 421:undated 411:dschwab 297:bri3jor 144:LeviK3a 39:archive 3763:Hoopes 3749:Hoopes 3701:Hoopes 3657:Hoopes 3584:Hoopes 3541:Hoopes 3490:Hoopes 3486:if any 3386:Hoopes 3351:Hoopes 3273:Hoopes 3267:, and 3261:fringe 3178:WP:RSN 3164:Hoopes 3143:fringe 3100:Hoopes 3096:fringe 3069:Hoopes 2988:Hoopes 2930:Hoopes 2866:Hoopes 2849:Dennis 2831:mythos 2746:Hoopes 2675:Hoopes 2650:Hoopes 2600:Hoopes 2553:Hoopes 2532:Olmecs 2083:Hoopes 2057:Hoopes 2023:Hoopes 1972:Jordan 1957:Hoopes 1926:Hoopes 1895:Hoopes 1871:occult 1814:Hoopes 1766:Hoopes 1730:Hoopes 1677:Hoopes 1615:Hoopes 1559:Hoopes 1510:Hoopes 1482:Ktwest 1466:Hoopes 1445:Hoopes 1397:Hoopes 1350:Hoopes 1295:Hoopes 1266:Hoopes 1236:Hoopes 1194:Hoopes 1170:Abirt4 1155:Hoopes 1151:really 1119:Hoopes 1080:Hoopes 1046:Hoopes 1015:Hoopes 976:Hoopes 925:Hoopes 873:Hoopes 844:Hoopes 616:Places 475:Ktwest 241:Abirt4 3580:facts 3382:crank 3000:From 2919:still 2549:least 2445:is a 2288:Vunil 2272:Vunil 1599:Vunil 1312:Vunil 172:Vunil 16:< 3767:talk 3753:talk 3705:talk 3661:talk 3647:talk 3624:talk 3588:talk 3576:does 3545:talk 3494:talk 3443:and 3390:talk 3355:talk 3277:talk 3228:talk 3168:talk 3137:and 3104:talk 3090:and 3073:talk 3065:fact 2992:talk 2971:your 2934:talk 2870:talk 2793:and 2750:talk 2679:talk 2654:talk 2604:talk 2557:talk 2385:talk 2352:talk 2343:see 2292:talk 2276:talk 2260:talk 2230:talk 2212:talk 2197:talk 2183:talk 2152:talk 2137:talk 2122:talk 2103:talk 2087:talk 2079:talk 2061:talk 2042:talk 2027:talk 2013:and 2007:talk 1986:talk 1961:talk 1945:talk 1930:talk 1914:talk 1899:talk 1851:talk 1836:talk 1818:talk 1810:drum 1793:talk 1770:talk 1749:talk 1734:talk 1711:talk 1696:talk 1681:talk 1656:talk 1641:talk 1633:talk 1619:talk 1603:talk 1586:talk 1563:talk 1538:talk 1522:talk 1514:talk 1486:talk 1470:talk 1449:talk 1428:talk 1401:talk 1385:talk 1368:talk 1354:talk 1330:talk 1316:talk 1299:talk 1285:talk 1270:talk 1255:talk 1240:talk 1213:talk 1198:talk 1174:talk 1159:talk 1139:talk 1123:talk 1098:talk 1084:talk 1065:talk 1050:talk 1034:talk 1019:talk 994:talk 980:talk 955:talk 929:talk 913:talk 896:talk 877:talk 863:talk 848:talk 833:talk 825:talk 687:talk 600:talk 571:and 510:some 493:talk 479:talk 465:talk 451:talk 415:talk 397:talk 385:talk 371:talk 357:talk 343:talk 329:talk 315:talk 301:talk 287:talk 273:talk 259:talk 245:talk 231:talk 217:talk 204:talk 190:talk 176:talk 162:talk 148:talk 103:The 3786:ous 3737:ous 3682:ous 3565:ous 3513:ous 3470:the 3414:ous 3316:not 3297:ous 3245:ous 3199:ous 3153:not 3124:ous 3043:ous 3019:ous 2980:you 2975:not 2959:ous 2900:ous 2805:to 2770:ous 2716:? 2699:ous 2629:ous 2582:ous 2465:by 2452:the 2435:ETs 2410:ous 1228:'s 1188:in 557:of 516:you 487:by 473:by 459:by 445:by 417:) 409:by 379:by 365:by 351:by 337:by 323:by 309:by 295:by 281:by 267:by 253:by 239:by 225:by 211:by 198:by 184:by 170:by 156:by 142:by 3769:) 3755:) 3707:) 3663:) 3649:) 3626:) 3590:) 3547:) 3496:) 3392:) 3357:) 3279:) 3263:, 3230:) 3186:me 3182:He 3170:) 3106:) 3075:) 3004:: 2994:) 2936:) 2872:) 2752:) 2744:. 2720:? 2681:) 2656:) 2606:) 2559:) 2538:, 2534:, 2521:, 2513:, 2509:, 2505:, 2501:, 2433:, 2429:, 2387:) 2354:) 2294:) 2278:) 2262:) 2232:) 2199:) 2185:) 2177:. 2162:. 2154:) 2139:) 2124:) 2116:. 2105:) 2089:) 2063:) 2029:) 2021:. 1992:) 1988:• 1963:) 1947:) 1932:) 1901:) 1877:, 1873:, 1853:) 1838:) 1820:) 1799:) 1795:• 1772:) 1751:) 1736:) 1713:) 1698:) 1683:) 1675:. 1662:) 1658:• 1621:) 1605:) 1592:) 1588:• 1565:) 1540:) 1524:) 1488:) 1472:) 1451:) 1434:) 1430:• 1403:) 1387:) 1370:) 1356:) 1332:) 1318:) 1301:) 1287:) 1272:) 1257:) 1242:) 1215:) 1200:) 1176:) 1161:) 1141:) 1125:) 1100:) 1086:) 1052:) 1036:) 1021:) 996:) 982:) 961:) 957:• 931:) 915:) 898:) 879:) 865:) 850:) 835:) 689:) 628:. 606:) 602:• 547:.) 532:. 441:- 399:) 127:. 3765:( 3751:( 3703:( 3659:( 3645:( 3622:( 3586:( 3543:( 3492:( 3478:a 3388:( 3353:( 3314:( 3275:( 3226:( 3166:( 3102:( 3071:( 2990:( 2932:( 2868:( 2748:( 2708:" 2677:( 2652:( 2602:( 2555:( 2458:a 2383:( 2350:( 2321:. 2290:( 2274:( 2258:( 2228:( 2210:( 2195:( 2181:( 2150:( 2135:( 2120:( 2101:( 2085:( 2059:( 2040:( 2025:( 2005:( 1984:( 1959:( 1943:( 1928:( 1912:( 1897:( 1849:( 1834:( 1816:( 1791:( 1768:( 1747:( 1732:( 1709:( 1694:( 1679:( 1654:( 1639:( 1631:( 1617:( 1601:( 1584:( 1561:( 1536:( 1520:( 1512:( 1484:( 1468:( 1447:( 1426:( 1399:( 1383:( 1366:( 1352:( 1328:( 1314:( 1297:( 1283:( 1268:( 1253:( 1238:( 1211:( 1196:( 1172:( 1157:( 1137:( 1121:( 1096:( 1082:( 1063:( 1048:( 1032:( 1017:( 992:( 978:( 953:( 927:( 911:( 894:( 875:( 861:( 846:( 831:( 823:( 772:) 685:( 681:. 598:( 575:. 495:) 491:( 481:) 477:( 467:) 463:( 453:) 449:( 427:. 413:( 395:( 387:) 383:( 373:) 369:( 359:) 355:( 345:) 341:( 331:) 327:( 317:) 313:( 303:) 299:( 289:) 285:( 275:) 271:( 261:) 257:( 247:) 243:( 233:) 229:( 219:) 215:( 202:( 192:) 188:( 178:) 174:( 164:) 160:( 150:) 146:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.