User talk:Huperphuff - Knowledge (XXG)

1089:"Cloverfield" and "Slusho" are reported names for the films, but it's reported as verifiable speculation, meaning that a prominent reliable source mentioned it as a possibility. The titles themselves are not verifiable, so to expound theories about the meaning of either one (despite the fact they may both be correct) is also unverifiable original research. Basically, there's a multitude of theories out there right now about the title or something in the trailer or images, but they don't warrant inclusion because it's not confirmed to be true. — 1349: 1293: 1684: 1210: 1450: 1406: 999: 1602: 1789: 1810:

is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us

1067:

Right, but you're adding on information that is not included in the citation and instead came from you. We've had a lot of discussion on the talk page about the verifiability of such information and how it should not be expounded upon by editors like ourselves. The fact remains with what is said in

723:

I really like your article and the search term "misa campo wikipedia" is getting a lot of popularity as when you type "misa c" on Google suggest the first term that comes up is "misa campo wikipedia" or "misa campo wiki". This means people are looking for her profile and details. Also, I can licence

1618:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if

641:

for any length of time, you will undoubtedly run into many self-promotional articles by bands who proclaim themselves to be "up and coming". "Up and coming" equals "not notable yet", which in turn equals "not notable". Believe me, sometimes I feel like I've speedy-tagged articles about damn near

1581:

For some reason this page suddenly showed up as a candidate for speedy deletion today, possibly as a result of some tweaking by the developers. Since you seem to be inactive I just went ahead and deleted rather than trying to fix it again, but should you return in the future it would be a simple

1869:

experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a

1108:

A lot of sites have reported their speculative coverage about this project, and the majority of them have been excluded. Instead, reliable sources like USA Today, The Star Ledger, and the news channel have been cited. All the other analysis that's been done is not cross the threshold into

545:

existing articles to properly link to the new ones. I've copyedited articles on subjects where I'm not an expert, but where I could at least improve the language and organize the facts better. Where else except Knowledge (XXG) can a nerd from Oregon make improvements to articles on

653:

Pictures: You don't need this many. Also, we're justifiably twitchy about copyrights around here, and pix that are simply pulled off a web site and used without permission or at least a decent fair-use rationale are subject to deletion. See Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines on

1241:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 646:

appears to have done enough interesting things to make the cut), and phrases like "up and coming" will usually prompt a sigh and an eye-roll from anyone experienced in this sort of thing. The phrases I've cited here basically say she's "up and coming". Not

1471:

Okay I'm sending this to everyone who has contributed (or tried) to this article and its previous incarnations. I have plenty of pics of her and I think she's hot, but I don't see her career at the point of sufficient exposure for an article here. Now

1538:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate 939:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate 861:

the speedy deletion templates on your notes page and removed the categories: now, you will see the templates but the page will not be tagged for deletion. When adding to the page, please substitute the templates and remove the categories they include.

751:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate 1427:

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

1263:

I know we got off to a rough start, but if you are interested in continuing work with film articles on Knowledge (XXG), I have worked on them for a while now. I work on mostly future films, though I have a few pet projects (just nominated

980:

It is wise to get permission first, before posting an image. Otherwise, you are creating a lot of extra work for everybody. Knowledge (XXG) cannot afford to get casual about copyright violations (real or potential) in this litigious era.

700:

I'm glad you're continuing to ask questions and reading up on how things work around here. I get a lot "Wah! You deleted my article!" messages on my talk page from people who Just Don't Get It, and instead of trying to understand

314:

of your user page to use as a workspace. You can then work on the article at your leisure, and then move it to the main article space when you are done. (You can also request that the subpage be deleted if you don't need it

403:. Knowledge (XXG) gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Knowledge (XXG), the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an 356:. Knowledge (XXG) gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Knowledge (XXG), the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an 411:

indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

364:

1162:

I apologize if I sounded anal; it's just that a lot of people tend to add speculation, either from their perspective or unreliable sources, to the article, and I find myself explaining the same issue repeatedly.

1268:

for GA status today). You can find subpages of links and guidelines on my userpage, if you are interested, and you can reach me at my talk page if there are any questions pertaining to film articles. —

1237:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

472:

policy to an extreme. It's no fun abusing someone who refuses to get angry, if you know what I mean. When you have more experience, I suggest you add some tools that'll make your "tagging" easier (

468:. A small warning... if you tackle vandals prepare yourself for receiving abuse / vandalism to your user pages. It's best to handle such abuse in an irritatingly good-natured way, taking our 1381:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 1325:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 504: 1045:, bringing unrelated facts together to further an argument. There is no official confirmation of Slusho in relation to this project, just "inside" reports that may very well be false. — 492:

I have exactly the same editing ability as you. No special sooper-sekrit powers are required for patrolling for vandalism and the like, just a good grasp of policies and procedures.

524:

Keep tagged articles on your watch list until they've been deleted, an admin removes the tag, or the article improves to the point where you feel safe rescinding the tag yourself.

1377:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1321:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

503:, which detail processes for dealing with articles that probably should be deleted but don't meet the speedy deletion criteria. Other permanent residents on my watchlist are 1424:. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. 508: 515: 650:"Supermodel": Okay, she's hot, but "supermodel" implies that she's achieved a high enough status in the modeling world that she'll never need to work as a barmaid again. 618:"Seeing as she is a fairly new model there isn't a lot of information available about her." Big strike against her, since all information in an encyclopedia should be 1542:, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. 943:, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. 755:, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. 637:"he is a new model and her career hasn't exploded yet", "working on her growing career as a model while being a barmaid in California": If you start patrolling the 1711:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

1370:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

1314:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

1231: 1707:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1366:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1310:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1465: 214: 530:

Some articles simply need improvement or cleanup. If you're not feeling up to doing it yourself, you can still flag them for attention with the appropriate

1622:

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created

476:

is excellent) but while you're still a newbie, I don't really recommend it. All in all, good luck! Just one last thing... what made you choose me to ask? --

1421: 83: 1135:. Since it's user-submitted, the verifiability of its information for a film before its release (and even afterward) is not certain. Here's an example: 1655: 1651: 1635: 1631: 1386: 1330: 1242: 220: 179: 1874: 1141:

shows Raimi as the director (not rumored or in talks or anything), yet Raimi has not made a decision about if he will continue with the series. —

1865:

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most

1858:

is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group

1659: 1565: 1509: 1246: 966: 778: 435: 388: 680:

General: The thing to keep in mind is that above all, Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia, not just a repository of random information. See

1886: 681: 1836: 307:

The welcome template I've added above contains many useful links to help files, policies and procedures. I hope you'll check these over.

1226:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge (XXG) constitutes fair use. Please go to

408: 361: 500: 1554: 1007: 955: 767: 424: 404: 377: 357: 165: 1378: 1322: 1238: 537:

Sometimes you find something you can latch onto and improve yourself. Someone created a series on articles on various albums by

464:. You'll need to get a good grasp of the speedy deletion criteria... they take some getting used to, I'm afraid - read them here 138: 209: 1882: 920: 456:

Good on you! I guess you want to "patrol recent changes" or become a member of the "counter vandalism unit". Start by reading

1699:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1358:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1302:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 531: 496: 434:. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at 387:. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at 200: 1712: 1643: 1549: 1501: 1371: 1315: 950: 762: 419: 372: 257: 322:, but on the other hand, we're not psychic and can only base an assessment of an article on what's there, not on what's 72: 1619:

the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

1461: 1003: 268: 1277: 1191: 1172: 1150: 1118: 1098: 1077: 1054: 1031: 554:? That's what it's all about--lots of people getting together and creating the best encyclopedia on Earth. :-) -- 1855: 1015: 261: 705:

their article got tagged, they just stomp off saying "Those meanies won't let me have my article!" Take care. --

1854:

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the

936: 748: 547: 527:

I've certainly been wrong before in my assessments of articles. If you're overruled, don't take it personally.

400: 353: 267:

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that

61: 50: 1182:

Please note that another experienced editor has reverted you... there's nothing false about what I'm saying. —

1815:

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.

94: 1639: 1575: 1505: 1496: 253: 116: 1835:

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see

1695: 1610: 1515:

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.

615:

Lose the interviews. They don't add much to the article, and they don't really belong in an encyclopedia.

190: 1535: 697:

Popularity: Popularity certainly contributes to notability, but they're not necessarily the same thing.

105: 1614:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 1223: 205: 1354: 1227: 1218: 1203: 1587: 1298: 1250: 127: 1818:

If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

1019: 473: 252:

for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on

1464:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 1433: 1413: 1390: 1334: 913: 1704: 1363: 1307: 541:(one of my faves)--I didn't do anything to the articles themselves, but I fixed or added links on 521:

Some people will complain at you, some will just ask questions. Always be ready with the answers.

1417: 1399: 884: 713: 670: 585: 562: 337: 297: 1457: 1443: 1132: 883:

Oh thanks for deleting accidental twin articles made on Rohrbeg and Kaltenbach. Delete at will.

858: 600: 241: 234: 1811:

in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

1770: 1757: 1667: 1480: 1265: 248:, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see 186: 1708: 1508:

and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at

1367: 1311: 457: 319: 249: 1683: 1520: 1348: 1292: 733: 638: 574: 244:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under the 1807: 1725: 1539: 1131:

Actually, IMDb is disputed as a reliable source. Take a look at the argument presented at

1042: 940: 898: 752: 655: 469: 465: 461: 245: 1753: 1583: 1429: 982: 845: 825: 809: 277: 161: 28: 1700: 1359: 1303: 623: 311: 1561: 1273: 1187: 1168: 1146: 1114: 1094: 1073: 1050: 1027: 962: 908: 863: 774: 691: 643: 431: 384: 286: 1449: 1405: 1209: 998: 619: 608: 514:

I'm enough of a cynical bastard that it's hard to Assume Good Faith at times, so when

706: 663: 578: 555: 330: 290: 1731:

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

289:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- 1766: 1663: 1476: 477: 447: 737: 725: 674: 1628:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

271:

wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template

1658:. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the 1601: 1516: 1011: 729: 897:

Hey, I don't recommend having a link and/or a page like that, since it implies

829: 793: 538: 1615: 1504:, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to 1269: 1183: 1164: 1142: 1110: 1090: 1069: 1046: 1023: 1824: 1890: 1788: 1774: 1671: 1591: 1569: 1524: 1484: 1436: 1393: 1337: 1281: 1253: 1195: 1176: 1154: 1136: 1122: 1102: 1081: 1058: 1035: 987: 970: 925: 887: 868: 852: 816: 782: 717: 589: 566: 480: 450: 341: 301: 1222:. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under 687:

Interviews: Simply linking to the interviews is the way to go, I think.

446:

Thanks for your message... what did you mean by "becoming a tagger"? --

642:

every crappy band on six continents (and I almost made it seven, but

551: 329:

Let me know if you have further questions. Thanks, and take care. --

318:

Sorry if the deletion seemed harsh. We try to be welcoming and to

1830:

Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

1648:

the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:28, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

1738:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

1545: