293:
cannot take the time to learn the nuances of wiki formatting, but is willing to generate new important content if the process is not made too arduous. Based on this last cycle: no one with my responsibilities will take the time to do writing if it takes this long and requires this much angst on all sides to make it work (and I am yet the "least of these" in the scientific echelons). To return to the main point: Perhaps a two-prong review is needed, one based on wiki format and other wiki-criteria, and the other based primarily on content. The former would only result in delay in appearance if errors are singularly or cumulatively egregious, the latter could delay appearance in the case that an **expert** reviewer noted significant errors in fact or emphasis. Bottom line, the credential and process questions posed were and are sincere questions. We don't learn, and things don't change, by beating around the bush. Emotion creates opportunity for virtue insofar as it allows distillation, from any given haze, of the key elements necessary for process understanding and change. Since I don't know your system, I ask again, please elevate, and keep me in the loop. I would propose a 15 minute phone conference with someone in authority of the over-arching review process. But then I am old-fashioned, results oriented, and and very time-constrained. Prof D
158:
are if it is unsourced, if it is copyvio, and if the subject is not notable. Other cases apply; however, they usually apply in conjunction with another or in an unrelated manner. For example, declining due to lack of context is usually done because the content doesn't establish notability, but you believe the person might be notable. This might be something like Jo
Schmuck owns a company. You realize that this person may be notable; however, you absolutely cannot tell by that one sentence. The other biggie is the BLP violation one, but I'm sure you knew that. Do you use the helper script? My general guideline is that if it would pass AFD it should pass AFC; however, that guideline appears to be about to fail for me :( In any case, thanks for your work! I've not seen you around before, where are you active?
485:
references to "me" or "my" and replaced them with "she" or "her." I don't think any of these changes are likely to be an issue, but you may both wish to have a look them and undo them if you think the original was better. With respect to the publications, it's my view that the reader should be able to readily access the information about the subject (insofar as possible) within
Knowledge (XXG) itself rather than have to hit the reference links and go to external sources to find out why the subject is notable and what they have published/done. However, if she doesn't wish any of her publications to be noted within her page that's okay with me. I agree that the article is ready to be moved to the main space now. Cheers, Susan Snowysusan 21:48, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
537:
mentioned. Namely, the tone of the talk was changed to a formal tone, all of the peacock phrases were removed, and all of the citations were either changed or verified. I have been meticulous with citations and secondary references and I had a discussion with a few members of
Knowledge (XXG) regarding the fact that many of the citable articles only existed as copies on websites and no longer existed on the original journal or newspaper sites and therefore were not useful. I have been very thorough with Excirial and other Knowledge (XXG) staff suggestions and the fact that you simply cut and paste the identical comments as his prior to my changes implies that you did not properly review the article, the citations, and the changes I made to the article.
588:
ask you about the following sentences which are from secondary sources. Although they may seem subjective, they do come from heavy weights in the field and their exclusion would be undermining the impact John has had on them and on communities they are involved in. Alternatively, I have also found negative comments so I could include those as well to balance the viewpoints. I will continue looking for more objective commentary and send them ahead, but the problem I have found is that many secondary sources now only exist as copies on websites and not in the original source website or archives.
373:
in order to keep everything from imploding on us. A lot of our editors fit the definition of children. Yes, you are selling your articles to children (some of whom are more strict than I am), none of whom have any expertise in half the subjects that we're approving (but then again, this is
Knowledge (XXG), and no one person knows everything). I am not within that group, but I do believe that articles should be improved as much as possible (so, paragraphs), if possible. You do have valid concerns though in that the process does have issues, and we are trying to hash out all of these arguments
392:
calliopejen, who I trust, and Daniel
Mietchen, whose work I became aware of. Perhaps it is impatience -- of a type you will feel when the myriads of your interests in people, activities, things narrow to a very few of each -- that makes me say, I have to find assurances of a path to contribute quality content without further major hitches, or otherwise have to "change horses in mid-ride". Life is too short. Cheers, and if any further "paths" for process change come to mind -- if Jimmy is your uncle -- let me know. Prof D
566:
your article. The comments I added were "Hey. You provide a great overview of de Ruiter's "awakening" and work, but not really enough objective analysis of what impact he's had on the philosophical community for this to really be an encyclopedic article." Since it's true that your article underwent major improvements and I think it's valid that you're contesting my judgment, I'll ask another review -- probably
Excirial, since he was the previous reviewer, for a second opinion. Cheers,
1264:
918:
769:
704:
208:. It's a new program with the aim of increasing new editor retention, specifically relating to female editor retention. You can share your knowledge and ask questions about things you might be a bit rusty on. In any case, it's great to have you back and I hope you stay! It's totally cool if you can't edit during the school year too, I probably didn't make more than 100 total edits during my first year of college.
658:
1059:
845:
508:
1324:
1009:
37:(3) If you believe that it is better to leave this content unavailable, because of the formatting issue, so be it. I will elevate this issue as broadly as I can, to as many as I can, to see what I consider to be an additional deep flaw in an organization already struggling vis-a-vis the quality of its scientific content.
592:
extraordinary powerfulness and draw.”(38) American contemporary spiritual teacher and author, Ram Dass (Richard Albert), called de Ruiter “the real thing”.(41) Known as an accessible teacher, De Ruiter has been called a modern day
Socrates seeking out the ultimate knowledge of the deepest self.(42)(43)
157:
I actually didn't, I was going to wait until tonight just because I wanted to see your comment and make sure I wasn't missing something. (Occasionally editors decline a submission and don't really give all of the reason in the decline) In any case, the three most major reasons to decline an article
1348:
Awww no!!! Basically college has taken over my life and I've been having enough trouble writing papers and doing problem sets and remembering to sleep, eat, and breathe as it is, let alone go on IRC. I'll try and reappear sometime (and start editing again... derp) And in the meantime, hugs to all of
591:
Doctor Carl
Mindell, former Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at New York’s Albany Medical College, refers to de Ruiter as “the most powerful spiritual teacher I’ve ever seen — and I’ve seen a goodly number of them.(36)(37) John’s teaching is single-mindedly from the absolute, and as such, carries an
565:
Hi. Thanks for your messages. It's true that you made major improvements and I recognise that and thank you for it, but more importantly than the template were the comments I added below, which I thought more applicable to your article. I was very much on the fence about whether to decline or accept
312:
resulted in their loss of ability to create articles. In addition, once you created an account, you lost the need to submit an article through the articles for creation process. In the future, you can create by searching for the title of the new article in
Knowledge (XXG)'s search bar. At the top
372:
The thing about AFC is that you are having people approve articles who basically are trusting that you aren't lying blatently to us (and this is a legitimate fear that we're doing this unknowingly). We have hundreds of articles that come in each day, and we have to equally approve hundreds each day
277:
Please do not badger our editors. Ice is new to the process and she is learning. Knowledge (XXG) is a website built on compromise, and we are all working together in order make the site better. I helped her review that article, and it does need work, but that does not mean that it is far from being
587:
Thank you for your comments and support. I really appreciate your feedback as I do want to produce a quality article and not simply get something posted that isn't good quality. You mentioned adding an objective analysis of what impact John has had on the philosophical community so I would like to
462:
About that list of publications, you'll see that I mentioned to her that it would be great to include a section like "Selected publications" which would list a few (usually less than 10?) particularly outstanding, notable, or otherwise exceptional works important to others in her field. You could
183:
Ah. I'll definitely keep that in mind when I review articles. Regarding my
Knowledge (XXG) activity, it's been sort of strange. I was active back around 2008/09ish and did some editing of book articles, meteorology, super minor stuff. For a while when I had time, I helped out with Milhist A-class
321:
Click on that red link and you can create the article. If you feel you can create the article in one draft, or create an acceptable article in one draft and improve upon it later, you can add all of the context in the edit window that shows up. If you feel that you would like to create a draft
292:
The comment above is not a badgering, which is a loaded word with the potential to divert the discussion. Rather, it is a sincere, direct question that should be elevated if it touches on areas of policy not the bailiwick of frontline editors. Again, you have an article written by a prof that
391:
Thank you for the guidance. You are a very accomplished young man, an wiki is lucky to have your participation/devotion. Things change by virtue of substance, relationship/network, and timing -- the right ideas coming together with the right people at the right time. I have already messaged
245:
What specific credentials does this reviewer have, to approve or disapprove an article with content such as this? And why is the decision being placed back into his hands of a reviewer who simply approved an earlier reviewer's erroneous format disapproval decision? I simply cannot fathom this
484:
Good day. First let me apologize - I didn't know you were still working with Dr. Miettinen on the article and it wasn't my intention to interfere with an ongoing process. I also cleaned up some of the grammar, added some citations where they were missing, added section headers, and took out
261:
Hello. I accept my judgment might not have been perfect (I'm a flawed human being too), see Ryan Vesey's comment above. Your article has been approved and moved to mainspace and I'm certain it will be very valuable to readers. I'm sorry that this process or the "back-and-forth" has caused you
536:
If you read the articles reviewed by Nathan and Excirial you would have seen that the latter was a completely different article from the first. And, if you read the article reviewed by Excirial and compared it to the one you reviewed, you would have seen that I addressed all of the issues he
936:, which will be a small-scale meetup of all interested Wikimedians from the New England area. We will socialize, review regional events from the beginning of the year, look ahead to regional events of 2014, and discuss other things of interest to the group. Be sure to
262:
exasperation or pain, but please trust that I am speaking with perfect honesty when I say that I appreciate your contributions as a professional in the area. I will do my best to improve my actions particular in the context of Articles for Creation. Thank you, again.
1211:
1142:
1086:
246:
process, and how wikipedia expects anyone with professional responsibilities in a subject area to set aside time for the back-and-forth, for what should have been a simple "filling" of a clear scientific hole in wiki's content. I am beyond exasperated. Prof D.
184:
reviews, making sure stuff made sense/was consistent, read well, etc. And then high school kicked in (it still is) and pretty much killed any active editing of mine. I started doing AfC extremely recently (literally, a couple days?) mostly due to meeting
791:
campus on Saturday, January 18th, from 3-5 PM. Afterwards, we will be holding an informal dinner at a local restaurant. If you are curious to join us, please do so, as we are always looking for people to come and give their opinion! Finally, be sure to
203:
Well keep up your good work. The one decline was corrected. (In any case, it should have been approved in June and it was reasonable for you to defer to the previous reviewer) Since you are a female editor, I thought you might be interested in the
307:
To be frank, there are no credentials. Knowledge (XXG) is a community of volunteers and in essence, nobody is required to review any of the articles submitted. The process exists as a way to facilitate the contributions of IP editors after the
1065:
As you may have already heard, the Knowledge (XXG) community lost an invaluable member of the community last month. Adrianne Wadewitz was a feminist scholar of 18th-Century British literature, and a prolific editor of the site. As part of a
40:(4) As the subject line implies, I will not continue this discussion. If this is the way the system functions, then it simply is dysfunctional beyond repair (as it pertains to my involvement), and I will retire from work on it. Cheers.
1200:
After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:
1131:
After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:
355:
Thanks Ryan. This is useful information. And no slight intended by my pressing this after you disappeared from chat. Simply was confused by what occurred, and wanted the matter finished, so I could move on to other things. Cheers.
463:
easily make this a sub-heading under the "Research Publications" section which you have added. Just a suggestion, a compromise of sorts! Good luck! I'm really glad to see the changes that you've made. Hopefully she gets back promptly.
1217:
1148:
734:
448:
Thanks so much! Personally, I think it was a good idea for you to link Professor Miettinen's publications rather than write them all. I think that the article is much improved and I think that it is acceptable. I'm going to ask
1020:
1016:
1002:
1301:
1278:
377:, as that really is the only place where things can be recorded and accomplished. I would suggest that you bring any issues that you have there, as I'm sure that others would like to hear from you as well.
1205:
1136:
75:
794:
783:
759:
188:
and realizing I couldn't just look at a huge backlog and not do anything about it. I indeed do use the helper script. I definitely screwed up here, but hopefully that means it won't happen again.
1080:
326:. Clicking that will allow you to create the article in your userspace. Once you have finished the article, you can move the article by using the move button at the top of the page. Read
1070:, New England Wikimedians, in conjunction with local institutions of higher learning, have created three edit-a-thons that will be occurring in May and June. The events are as follows:
860:
from March 1 - March 31. We encourage you to join in an edit-a-thon near you, or to participate remotely if you are unable to attend in person (for the full list of articles, click
681:
737:, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future!
861:
421:
A different reviewer was pasting the entire list of publications and I do not wish them to be here. I have provided a link to publications of Professor Kaisa Miettinen.
1074:
1273:
Thank you, gnomish user banging your head against your "keyboard when encountering poorly written articles", for fixing them, for working on quality articles such as
1019:
edit-a-thon from 9:00-5:00 pm. You are more than welcome to attend, as there will be free food and drink, and an outing afterwards. If you are interested, please
938:
908:
620:
Thank you for your comments, I've added a few of my own on your talk page. Also, remember to sign your posts by typing four tildes (like this: ~~~~). Cheers,
34:(2) Please understand that content experts often are not, and will not become, expert wiki editors. I am not, and will not. I simply do not have the time.
856:
is excited to announce a series of Knowledge (XXG) edit-a-thons that will be taking place at colleges and universities throughout Massachusetts as part of
1067:
1224:
Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August:
1155:
Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August:
374:
1244:
1175:
1106:
1036:
987:
818:
788:
720:
608:
553:
418:
You had recently reviewed my submission and asked for references to be able to accept. I have done it now. Is this acceptable now?
489:
I've reviewed most of the cleanup that you did and think that it's good. Thanks for your opinion (and very, very quick response)!
1093:
We hope that you will be able to join us, whether you are an experienced editor or are using Knowledge (XXG) for the first time.
345:
223:
173:
116:
101:
added to it. Aside from that do you see any reason to decline? I will look at it tonight, but I thought I'd talk to you first.
31:(1) Please search within wiki for "macromolecular assembly", and you will see it is referred to repeatedly without definition.
1277:
in collaboration, for a so far last edit summary "amusing, but I don't really think that's necessary...", - you are an
323:
1212:
Adrianne Wadewitz Memorial Edit-a-thon on June 25th at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (exact location TBA)
1143:
Adrianne Wadewitz Memorial Edit-a-thon on June 25th at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (exact location TBA)
1356:
678:
to edit and create Knowledge (XXG) entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields.
627:
573:
522:
496:
470:
269:
195:
149:
134:
65:
17:
58:
See my reply below. Yes, the system is flawed, but it shouldn't prevent you from contributing your expertise!
322:
prior to moving the article, you should notice the fifth bullet point which allows you to create the page at
1368:
1359:
1342:
1313:
1293:
746:
630:
612:
576:
557:
525:
499:
473:
441:
401:
386:
365:
350:
302:
287:
272:
255:
228:
198:
178:
152:
137:
121:
68:
52:
596:
541:
1309:
1289:
779:
604:
549:
309:
205:
600:
545:
457:. She seems to be heavily interested in your article and I think it would be right to ask her opinion.
1274:
742:
454:
450:
338:
216:
166:
109:
1350:
621:
567:
516:
490:
464:
433:
425:
263:
189:
143:
128:
59:
1243:. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from
1174:. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from
1105:. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from
1035:. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from
316:
986:(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from
817:(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from
675:
437:
429:
1263:
81:
The lack of sections is not a reason to decline an article. Instead it should be accepted with
857:
127:
No, otherwise it seems good. I'm sorry to have offended anyone over this. I'll do this myself.
1338:
1305:
1285:
1032:
975:
890:
703:
674:), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at
397:
361:
319:", but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
298:
251:
95:
48:
1240:
1171:
1102:
967:
917:
806:
768:
667:
382:
283:
670:
is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (
1365:
1330:
738:
331:
209:
159:
102:
85:
1333:
mentioned that it's been a while since we've seen you on IRC. Look how sad he is! :(
717:
1214:, where we will also be hosting a "how to conduct an edit-a-thon" session beforehand
1145:, where we will also be hosting a "how to conduct an edit-a-thon" session beforehand
1089:, where we will also be hosting a "how to conduct an edit-a-thon" session beforehand
1334:
1028:
971:
886:
393:
357:
294:
247:
44:
825:
657:
946:
1236:
1167:
1098:
963:
802:
671:
378:
327:
279:
185:
1015:
On May 3rd, the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem, Massachusetts will be hosting a
950:
1087:
June 25th at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (exact location TBA)
1008:
1208:, with complete travel reimbursements available for those who participate
1139:, with complete travel reimbursements available for those who participate
636:
1058:
844:
826:
You're invited: Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March
1220:, which will feature at least one guest speaker, and possibly many more
1206:
Cape Cod Wiknic and Photography Blitz on June 14th in Barnstable County
1151:, which will feature at least one guest speaker, and possibly many more
1137:
Cape Cod Wiknic and Photography Blitz on June 14th in Barnstable County
1322:
928:
879:
945:
Also, if you haven't done so already, please consider signing up for
27:
Trained, experienced subject expert, likely to leave over this point
1323:
954:
76:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Macromolecular assembly
1228:
1159:
716:
Hope you and your family are enjoying the holiday season, Icy!
638:
You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard
680:
Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit
646:
U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University -
1057:
1007:
916:
843:
833:
Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March -
767:
656:
878:
Further information on dates and locations can be found on
583:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/John de Ruiter
1077:, in the Digital Scholarship Commons on the second floor
864:). Events are currently planned for the cities/towns of
1052:
Adrianne Wadewitz edit-a-thons in Southern New England
784:
2014 kick-off party and Knowledge (XXG) Day Celebration
752:
New England Knowledge (XXG) Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18
1235:
If you have any questions, please leave a message at
1166:
If you have any questions, please leave a message at
1097:
If you have any questions, please leave a message at
1027:
If you have any questions, please leave a message at
998:
278:
perfect. Thanks for your submission, and good luck!
1194:Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians!
1125:Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians!
1075:
May 21st at Northeastern University's Snell Library
1081:May 22nd at Brown University's Rockefeller Library
911:: April 19th at Clover Food Lab in Kendall Square
313:of the search results will be a phrase that says
1218:3rd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
1149:3rd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
735:2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
729:2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
1300:A year ago, you were the 925th recipient of my
8:
1003:Peabody Essex Museum Edit-a-thon Spring 2014
1045:Adrianne Wadewitz Memorial edit-a-thons
455:See this at the bottom of her talk page
1187:New England Wikimedians summer events!
1118:New England Wikimedians summer events!
694:
453:for a brief second opinion though --
142:Ah. You've done it for me. Thank you.
1023:, as we would love to see you there!
789:Massachusetts Institute of Technology
7:
24:
1262:
1083:, in the Digital Scholarship Lab
932:would like to invite you to the
702:
506:
1017:Native American and Chinese Art
762:: January 18 at MIT Building 5
432:) 20:39, 11 August 2012 (UTC) (
1270:fix of poorly written articles
241:Credential and process "check"
1:
1369:19:10, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
1360:21:17, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
1343:07:43, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
778:You have been invited to the
721:06:03, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
1068:worldwide series of tributes
960:We hope to see you there!
687:00:24, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
631:02:45, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
613:00:41, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
577:12:30, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
558:18:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
526:21:57, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
500:21:50, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
474:21:26, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
442:20:39, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
414:my article--kaisa miettinen
324:Special:Mypage/ARTICLE NAME
1387:
1314:06:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
1294:12:14, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
1193:
1124:
1051:
907:
900:
858:Wikiwomen's History Month
832:
801:I hope to see you there!
758:
747:09:28, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
701:
695:'Tis that season again...
645:
402:16:40, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
387:16:21, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
366:16:33, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
351:16:12, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
315:You may create the page "
303:15:37, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
288:22:18, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
273:22:11, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
256:22:01, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
229:04:42, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
199:04:09, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
179:03:30, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
153:22:07, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
138:22:06, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
122:21:29, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
69:22:11, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
53:21:06, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
1229:Wikimania 2014 in London
1160:Wikimania 2014 in London
924:Dear Fellow Wikimedian,
787:at Building Five on the
775:Dear Fellow Wikimedian,
666:Now in its fourth year,
18:User talk:IceUnshattered
949:and connect with us on
929:New England Wikimedians
854:New England Wikimedians
780:New England Wikimedians
733:You are invited to the
1327:
1062:
1012:
1000:You're invited to the
942:if you're interested.
921:
848:
798:if you're interested.
772:
661:
330:for more information.
1326:
1061:
1011:
920:
847:
771:
660:
310:Seigenthaler incident
1275:Alaska-class cruiser
451:User talk:Snowysusan
885:Questions? Contact
880:our user group page
1328:
1279:awesome Wikipedian
1063:
1013:
995:Edit-a-thon invite
934:April 2014 meeting
922:
849:
773:
676:Harvard Law School
662:
1253:
1252:
1248:
1184:
1183:
1179:
1115:
1114:
1110:
1040:
991:
983:
982:
898:
897:
894:
822:
814:
813:
726:
725:
692:
691:
688:
616:
599:comment added by
561:
544:comment added by
348:
226:
176:
119:
1378:
1353:
1302:PumpkinSky Prize
1266:
1237:Kevin Rutherford
1234:
1191:
1190:
1168:Kevin Rutherford
1165:
1122:
1121:
1099:Kevin Rutherford
1096:
1049:
1048:
1026:
985:
964:Kevin Rutherford
947:our mailing list
905:
904:
883:
835:You are invited!
830:
829:
816:
803:Kevin Rutherford
756:
755:
706:
699:
698:
685:
668:Ada Lovelace Day
648:You are invited!
643:
642:
624:
615:
593:
570:
560:
538:
519:
514:
510:
509:
493:
467:
379:Kevin Rutherford
346:
280:Kevin Rutherford
266:
224:
192:
174:
146:
131:
117:
100:
94:
90:
84:
62:
1386:
1385:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1351:
1321:
1298:
1297:
1267:
1258:
1189:
1120:
1047:
1042:
1006:
997:
903:
901:You're invited!
850:
828:
754:
731:
710:Happy Holidays!
697:
663:
641:
622:
594:
585:
568:
539:
534:
517:
507:
505:
491:
482:
480:Kaisa Miettinen
465:
424:Thanks ksindhy
416:
264:
243:
190:
144:
129:
98:
92:
88:
82:
79:
60:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1384:
1382:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1320:
1317:
1272:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1257:
1254:
1251:
1250:
1232:
1231:
1222:
1221:
1215:
1209:
1196:
1195:
1188:
1185:
1182:
1181:
1163:
1162:
1153:
1152:
1146:
1140:
1127:
1126:
1119:
1116:
1113:
1112:
1091:
1090:
1084:
1078:
1054:
1053:
1046:
1043:
999:
996:
993:
981:
980:
972:Maia Weinstock
913:
912:
902:
899:
896:
895:
884:
851:
842:
839:
838:
837:
827:
824:
812:
811:
764:
763:
753:
750:
730:
727:
724:
723:
713:
712:
707:
696:
693:
690:
689:
686:
684:to do either.
679:
664:
655:
652:
651:
650:
640:
635:
634:
633:
584:
581:
580:
579:
533:
530:
529:
528:
502:
481:
478:
477:
476:
459:
458:
415:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
370:
369:
368:
275:
242:
239:
238:
237:
236:
235:
234:
233:
232:
231:
140:
78:
73:
72:
71:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1383:
1370:
1367:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1358:
1354:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1325:
1318:
1316:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1296:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1282:
1280:
1276:
1271:
1265:
1255:
1249:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1230:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1219:
1216:
1213:
1210:
1207:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1198:
1197:
1192:
1186:
1180:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1161:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1150:
1147:
1144:
1141:
1138:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1129:
1128:
1123:
1117:
1111:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1094:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1069:
1060:
1056:
1055:
1050:
1044:
1041:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1024:
1022:
1018:
1010:
1005:
1004:
994:
992:
989:
979:
977:
973:
969:
965:
961:
958:
956:
952:
948:
943:
941:
940:
935:
931:
930:
925:
919:
915:
914:
910:
906:
892:
888:
881:
877:
873:
872:South Hadley,
870:
867:
863:
859:
855:
852:
846:
841:
840:
836:
831:
823:
820:
810:
808:
804:
799:
797:
796:
790:
786:
785:
781:
776:
770:
766:
765:
761:
757:
751:
749:
748:
744:
740:
736:
728:
722:
719:
715:
714:
711:
708:
705:
700:
683:
677:
673:
669:
665:
659:
654:
653:
649:
644:
639:
632:
629:
625:
619:
618:
617:
614:
610:
606:
602:
598:
589:
582:
578:
575:
571:
564:
563:
562:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
531:
527:
524:
520:
513:
503:
501:
498:
494:
488:
487:
486:
479:
475:
472:
468:
461:
460:
456:
452:
447:
446:
445:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
422:
419:
413:
403:
399:
395:
390:
389:
388:
384:
380:
376:
371:
367:
363:
359:
354:
353:
352:
349:
344:
343:
342:
337:
336:
335:
329:
325:
320:
318:
311:
306:
305:
304:
300:
296:
291:
290:
289:
285:
281:
276:
274:
271:
267:
260:
259:
258:
257:
253:
249:
240:
230:
227:
222:
221:
220:
215:
214:
213:
207:
202:
201:
200:
197:
193:
187:
182:
181:
180:
177:
172:
171:
170:
165:
164:
163:
156:
155:
154:
151:
147:
141:
139:
136:
132:
126:
125:
124:
123:
120:
115:
114:
113:
108:
107:
106:
97:
87:
77:
74:
70:
67:
63:
57:
56:
55:
54:
50:
46:
41:
38:
35:
32:
26:
19:
1329:
1306:Gerda Arendt
1299:
1286:Gerda Arendt
1283:
1269:
1268:
1233:
1223:
1199:
1164:
1154:
1130:
1095:
1092:
1064:
1025:
1021:sign up here
1014:
1001:
984:
962:
959:
944:
937:
933:
927:
926:
923:
909:NE Meetup #5
875:
871:
869:Northampton,
868:
865:
853:
834:
815:
800:
793:
782:
777:
774:
760:NE Meetup #4
732:
709:
647:
637:
595:— Preceding
590:
586:
540:— Preceding
535:
511:
483:
423:
420:
417:
340:
339:
333:
332:
317:ARTICLE NAME
314:
244:
218:
217:
211:
210:
168:
167:
161:
160:
111:
110:
104:
103:
80:
42:
39:
36:
33:
30:
601:Planktonium
546:Planktonium
328:Help:Moving
1366:Emufarmers
876:Cambridge.
739:EdwardsBot
504:...aaaand
347:Review me!
225:Review me!
175:Review me!
118:Review me!
1349:you!!!!!
1245:this list
1241:talk page
1176:this list
1172:talk page
1107:this list
1103:talk page
1037:this list
1033:talk page
1029:Ed Rodley
988:this list
939:RSVP here
819:this list
795:RSVP here
682:this page
1256:Precious
951:Facebook
609:contribs
597:unsigned
554:contribs
542:unsigned
434:Ksindhya
426:Ksindhya
206:Teahouse
186:this guy
96:Sections
1335:Legoktm
955:Twitter
887:Girona7
866:Boston,
394:Meduban
358:Meduban
295:Meduban
248:Meduban
45:Meduban
970:) and
86:wikify
43:ProfD
341:Vesey
219:Vesey
169:Vesey
112:Vesey
16:<
1364::v —
1339:talk
1310:talk
1304:, --
1290:talk
976:talk
968:talk
953:and
891:talk
874:and
862:here
807:talk
743:talk
672:STEM
605:talk
550:talk
512:Done
438:talk
430:talk
398:talk
383:talk
375:here
362:talk
334:Ryan
299:talk
284:talk
252:talk
212:Ryan
162:Ryan
105:Ryan
49:talk
1355://
1352:Icy
1331:Emu
1239:'s
1170:'s
1101:'s
1031:'s
957:.
626://
623:Icy
572://
569:Icy
532:AfC
521://
518:Icy
515::)
495://
492:Icy
469://
466:Icy
268://
265:Icy
194://
191:Icy
148://
145:Icy
133://
130:Icy
91:or
64://
61:Icy
1341:)
1319::(
1312:)
1292:)
1284:--
1281:!
990:.)
978:)
882:.
821:.)
809:)
745:)
718:Ed
611:)
607:•
556:)
552:•
444:)
440:)
400:)
385:)
364:)
301:)
286:)
254:)
99:}}
93:{{
89:}}
83:{{
51:)
1357:♫
1337:(
1308:(
1288:(
1247:.
1178:.
1109:.
1039:.
974:(
966:(
893:)
889:(
805:(
741:(
628:♫
603:(
574:♫
548:(
523:♫
497:♫
471:♫
436:(
428:(
396:(
381:(
360:(
297:(
282:(
270:♫
250:(
196:♫
150:♫
135:♫
66:♫
47:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.