45:
451:
320:
guidance be a useful contributor. He did have a genuine question on my talk page which I tried to answer as best I could. But his behaviour had me at my wits end and on the verge of reporting him, but was unsure of the board it related to. For future reference what board should I report it to if I see this sort of thing happening again?
297:
For your latest personal attacks (including in edit summaries) and for your threat to engage in socking, you have now lost the ability to edit this talk page. A number of us went out on a limb to get you back last time, but you have thrown our goodwill in our faces - we will not make the same mistake
222:
You need to seriously cool it, dude. Your assault on MisterShiney was laden with personal attacks and was way out of line. And your accusing him of treason?! Well, that's so outrageously stupid it almost defies comment. You are lucky you are only blocked for 24 hours - I would have given you an indef
275:
Your block is for your obnoxious personal attacks and for your continued threats on this page - I apologise for not changing the reason in the block log, but I am not able to do so now. This comes after a significant block history for previous personal attacks, and for a vandalism spree - and you
271:
I think it is. I wasn't aware that administrators were allowed to block people for things they haven't done, if this change in policy has gone through without my notice, then please tell me. It would have been appropriate to just change the reason, there would have been no problems. I feel it is
319:
Thank you Admins for your swift action. I was not aware that the conversation was being monitored and am pleased (if not slightly freaked out) at the swift responses as I was about to ask that this user be investigated/talked to for his edits to my talk page. I beleive that this user can, under
516:
Because
Iamthemuffinman's talk page access is revoked, he will need to appeal it to the Arbitration Committee. In the review he will also need to promise he will never abuse multiple accounts again. If the block is lifted, I will post on AN about proposing an interaction ban between him and
280:". You have massively violated that condition this time, and that is why you are indefinitely blocked. If you think there is any possibility of your ever being unblocked while you remain unconvinced of the need to alter your stance, then you'd better start rethinking pretty quickly. --
272:
absolutely right to make it known that one has been the victim of such abuses, and your random escalation to indefinite mere seconds after your first message does absolutely nothing to convince me to alter my stance. Iamthemuffinman 18:40, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
130:
You have blocked me on outragous and falsive grounds, if this block is not lifted at once I will escalate to Arbcom and make a full complaint about your competence as an administrator. I have never, not once ever made legal threats as you claim.
211:
This will now be escalated fully, and I will force my way through to an outcome that makes you both regret your foolish decisions today. You were given the chance to redress this massive act of abuse, you have thrown it away, I
256:
ensure you pay" is absolutely not acceptable, I have upped the block to indefinite. If the threats continue, I will revoke your ability to edit this talk page (unless someone else does first). --
142:
First, your combative tone hardly augurs for some sort of flower garden blossoming beneath your feet following an unblock, especially given that the shortness of this block. Second, while
470:
412:
201:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
85:
294:
Nah I'll just get myself a new account, like the way I chose not to do the last time. Bye tosser.Iamthemuffinman 18:53, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
37:
An onslaught was it? It looked to me like your friend escalated the situation of his own accord. Iamthemuffinman 17:24, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
80:
223:
until you convinced us that your obnoxious behaviour was going to stop. Now go away and try to get a sense of proportion into your head! --
431:
I have also removed your ability to use the
Knowledge email system, as you have apparently used it to continue your abusive behaviour. --
502:
186:
363:
Thanks Boing. I assume that should a user suddenly appear making similar attacks on my page I should make you all aware of it at once?
238:
I would also have done an indefblock; and will seriously consider making it so in the face of any more threats or disruption.--
28:
436:
420:
396:
354:
303:
285:
261:
228:
99:
490:
244:
57:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
459:
58:
432:
416:
392:
350:
299:
281:
257:
224:
52:
482:
474:
466:
252:
For the continued threats after the unblock request (which I did not see when I was making my comment) - "I
276:
have also had your account globally locked in the past. When you were previously unblocked, you were told "
372:
329:
239:
172:
164:
63:
143:
22:
365:
322:
496:
489:. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
195:
168:
17:
I have blocked you briefly to give MisterShiney a chance to recover from your onslaught. —
278:
any further evidence of incivility or a battleground mentality will have you blocked again
388:
346:
18:
518:
521:
440:
424:
400:
382:
358:
339:
307:
289:
265:
246:
232:
176:
32:
415:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --
450:
517:
MisterShiney due to creating a hostile environment for that user.
445:
345:
For the kind of personal attacks you were subject to, I think
216:
ensure you pay. Iamthemuffinman 18:27, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
43:
411:
Iamthemuffinman, Hello. There is currently a discussion at
183:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
203:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
157:
147:
113:
109:
103:
94:
90:
76:
72:
68:
51:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
471:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Iamthemuffinman
387:Yep, definitely - I have recorded my actions at
413:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
148:remove others' comments from your own talk page
349:is the best place to request swift action. --
8:
391:to ask people to keep their eyes open. --
146:, though not always well-advised, to
7:
473:. Note that multiple accounts are
158:remove other users' comments from
14:
449:
501:below, but you should read the
1:
441:19:15, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
425:19:15, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
401:19:13, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
383:19:02, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
359:18:58, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
340:18:51, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
308:18:57, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
290:18:49, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
266:18:37, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
247:18:34, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
233:18:31, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
177:18:22, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
33:17:17, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
522:22:04, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
55:, who declined the request.
537:
469:per evidence presented at
503:guide to appealing blocks
187:guide to appealing blocks
512:Possible interaction ban
499:|Your reason here ~~~~}}
150:, it is most definitely
458:This account has been
389:WP:Ani#Iamthemuffinman
48:
100:change block settings
47:
160:their own talk pages
493:by adding the text
433:Boing! said Zebedee
417:Boing! said Zebedee
393:Boing! said Zebedee
351:Boing! said Zebedee
300:Boing! said Zebedee
282:Boing! said Zebedee
258:Boing! said Zebedee
225:Boing! said Zebedee
49:
509:
508:
491:appeal this block
465:from editing for
163:. So you stay in
528:
500:
453:
446:
381:
379:
370:
338:
336:
327:
241:Anthony Bradbury
200:
194:
119:
117:
106:
88:
86:deleted contribs
46:
536:
535:
531:
530:
529:
527:
526:
525:
514:
494:
481:using them for
377:
373:
366:
364:
334:
330:
323:
321:
206:
198:
192:
191:, then use the
180:
133:
107:
97:
83:
66:
64:Iamthemuffinman
59:blocking policy
44:
12:
11:
5:
534:
532:
513:
510:
507:
506:
454:
444:
443:
428:
427:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
375:
332:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
250:
249:
220:
219:
218:
217:
181:
140:
136:Decline reason
128:
124:Request reason
121:
42:
41:
40:
39:
38:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
533:
524:
523:
520:
511:
504:
498:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
467:sock puppetry
464:
463:
461:
455:
452:
448:
447:
442:
438:
434:
430:
429:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
409:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
385:
384:
380:
378:
371:
369:
362:
361:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
343:
342:
341:
337:
335:
328:
326:
309:
305:
301:
296:
295:
293:
292:
291:
287:
283:
279:
274:
273:
270:
269:
268:
267:
263:
259:
255:
248:
245:
243:
242:
237:
236:
235:
234:
230:
226:
215:
210:
209:
208:
207:
205:
204:
197:
190:
188:
179:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
161:
155:
154:
149:
145:
139:
137:
132:
127:
125:
120:
115:
111:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
82:
78:
77:global blocks
74:
73:active blocks
70:
65:
60:
56:
54:
53:administrator
36:
35:
34:
30:
27:
24:
20:
16:
15:
515:
486:
483:illegitimate
478:
462:indefinitely
457:
456:
374:
368:MisterShiney
367:
331:
325:MisterShiney
324:
318:
277:
253:
251:
240:
221:
213:
202:
184:
182:
159:
152:
151:
141:
135:
134:
129:
123:
122:
95:creation log
62:
50:
25:
169:Daniel Case
298:again. --
91:filter log
185:read the
110:checkuser
69:block log
485:reasons
165:time-out
81:contribs
29:contribs
19:RHaworth
519:Hto9950
497:unblock
475:allowed
460:blocked
196:unblock
144:it's OK
104:unblock
505:first.
487:is not
347:WP:ANI
153:not OK
189:first
437:talk
421:talk
397:talk
355:talk
304:talk
286:talk
262:talk
254:WILL
229:talk
214:WILL
173:talk
167:. —
23:talk
479:but
156:to
114:log
61:).
495:{{
477:,
439:)
423:)
399:)
357:)
306:)
288:)
264:)
231:)
199:}}
193:{{
175:)
138::
126::
108:•
102:•
98:•
93:•
89:•
84:•
79:•
75:•
71:•
31:)
435:(
419:(
395:(
376:✉
353:(
333:✉
302:(
284:(
260:(
227:(
171:(
118:)
116:)
112:(
67:(
26:·
21:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.