539:
31:
322:
none with the words "Knowledge (XXG)" came up and recieved 26 resultshttp://www.google.co.uk/search?as_q=Byzantine-Ottoman+Wars+&hl=en&num=10&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=Byzantine-Ottoman+wars&as_oq=&as_eq=Knowledge (XXG)&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&as_rights=&safe=off. So it seems thats not unfound.
156:
dates in the edit-histories and the fact that you had never edited those articles before, reveal who has been stalking whom. Now you are about to start again, so I'm obliged to give you a warning. I tried to reconcile with you via email but you turned me down, you might as well stay clear off the articles I edit. If you are bored that's not my problem, just leave my contribution list alone.
81:(1) Me being a sockpuppet of Greier's would require him to have been using essentially the same open proxy ever since I registered on Knowledge (XXG) Ɣnd have somehow managed to hack the server of a renown national institute from which I have recently been corresponding with one of the administrators.
321:
In response to your comment about the nature of the terminology, I agree that it is not exactly a well known term. However, this is not because the term itself is not used; rather information about the conflict is lacking. In any case, I googled for the words
Byzantine Ottoman wars and made sure that
255:
Firstly, that article doesnt question its reliability. Furthermore, the AFP article which has been posted on several news organization webpages has been exposed as a lie. The reporter did absolutely no research. Iranica released its own letter objecting to the lies in the articles. I will try to find
77:
I have been falsely accused of being a sockpuppet of a banned user named Greier. I hereby wish to state explicitly that this is not the case. I have been a bona fide, be it infrequently posting user since 2005, when I first registered as
Iblardi. I am Dutch and operate from an IP address based in the
155:
This is just an excuse. This had not been the case, it only became the case once you decide to be editing everything you saw on my contribution list. At some point, prior to wub's warning, I'd go through my contribution list then I'd go through yours and find you editing the exact same articles. The
396:
Well, without going into specifics, sometimes it is difficult to determine exactly which part of a statement was taken from a source, especially when it concerns more general information and the source is not directly accessible. It is certainly not my intention to suggest those references say
173:
Like I said, if you want to reconcile with me all you have to do is reply to my emails. There is no need to involve third parties in this. The mediation proposal was made for a content dispute, but in reality there is none. There's only an action-reaction kind of communication which causes all
93:. An administrator who performs an IP-check will be able to see that, if the accusation were true, the user who called himself Greier would at the time have been performing three edits from two different IP-addresses within one minute, and on two completely unrelated subjects.
369:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are
385:
It's obvious that you are watching my edits, which is fine but do remember that whatever you think of me or my edits, that changing facts which you consider 'obvious' requires new references, so don't try (wether consciously or not) to include your claims under my
397:
something different than they do, of course. As to "me watching your edits", I have this article in my watchlist, so naturally it comes up every once in a while and I may or may not decide to contribute on that occasion. Have a nice day.
344:, and removing reliably sourced material is considered vandalism in wikipedia. Please seek consensus for each of your removals first or they will be reverted and try to discuss changes rather than engaging in an edit war.- Best regards
472:
I suggest you look up
Personal Attacks first before you start accusing people of making them. You denied watching my edits and I proved you were. So how do we call that action? Lying. It's not a personal attack that's a well proven
305:. Also, I'm not too convinced about the article's content. I had marked it as 'unsourced' but someone removed the tag and added some references at the bottom of the page. The referencing is still poor and the content dubious.
406:
In that case, isn't is more logical to assume it isn't in the source? Really the excuse for watching my edits doesn't fly. Like I said I don't mind, but don't lie about it. This isn't the first time.A nice day
142:
Point taken. Although it is hard to completely avoid him, since there is some overlap of fields of interest, I'll do my best to stay clear of the guy. I didn't mean to be disruptive.
374:
123:
Hi, I know it can be difficult to stay away from people you've been in conflict with, but try and avoid following Miskin's contributions. Such behaviour can be considered
202:
Please restore any ISBN-numbers you may find deleted by user:Iblardi, or numbers connected by a hyphen in general. I appear to be pestered by some kind of malware.
108:
Given this and the e-mail evidence you sent me I have unblocked you. I have replied to your e-mail with more information and hopefully answers to your questions.
301:
Greetings
Iblardi. Can you help me verify the content of this article? I know the unit existed but I'm pretty sure that the most popular anglophone name is
366:
445:
Yes, that has happened once or twice. But a few isolated instances do not mean that I am following you around in any structural way. Relax about it.
484:
A flame war over what? Calling someone a liar without proof is a PA. And a what is or isn't a PA isn't determined by you, but trough wikipedia.
370:
362:
188:
Look, I promise I'll try to be calmer from now on, it's just that the feeling of being followed creeps me out. I have to go too for now.
493:
I am not even talking about WP:NPA, but you are right: calling someone a liar without proof is a personal attack. I rest my case.
84:(2) Furthermore, after some research I have found at least one example of simultaneous postings by me and the banned user:
546:
38:
365:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to
436:) a mere 18 minutes after I did and reverted my edit? I don't care what you think about me, but I'm not stupid.
124:
315:
295:
267:
257:
242:
429:
358:
228:
555:
503:
485:
474:
455:
437:
408:
387:
131:
112:
47:
17:
416:
Ehm... Just compare your and my list of contributions, OK? There's nothing to "lie" about.
337:
345:
216:
The listing for type species is the original binomial and authority, not the current one.
341:
323:
286:
225:
502:
As I already said, proof has been provided. Accept it and move on. Have a nice day.
494:
464:
446:
417:
398:
203:
143:
128:
109:
99:
506:
497:
488:
477:
467:
458:
449:
440:
420:
411:
401:
390:
348:
326:
309:
289:
270:
260:
245:
241:
Thanks for your comment. Also, please see my response regarding your last comment.
231:
206:
192:
178:
160:
146:
136:
117:
102:
554:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
306:
189:
175:
157:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
285:
impressed me considering your history with Miskin. My hat is off to youĀ :) --
220:
is correct for type species, even though it later got moved to the genus
336:
You are removing sourced material from the article based on your own
78:
Netherlands. In my defense, I wish you to consider two things:
533:
25:
425:
I see, so I'm supposed to believe that it's coincidence you
434:
an article I find hard to believe you yourself searched for
463:
Now quit the personal attacks. This is getting annoying.
426:
282:
91:
88:
85:
340:, like it or not, the references you removed respect
266:Oh, nevermind, its already there. Have a good day.
8:
454:I am relaxed,I just don't like people lying.
127:, and can't be good for either of you.
552:Do not edit the contents of this page.
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
24:
537:
29:
74:To anyone who is reading this,
1:
118:12:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
103:12:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
507:20:04, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
498:19:55, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
489:19:46, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
478:19:23, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
468:19:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
459:19:14, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
450:18:32, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
441:18:21, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
421:17:58, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
412:17:50, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
402:17:29, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
391:14:12, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
588:
373:. Reviewers' concerns are
232:22:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
207:01:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
147:05:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
137:21:43, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
361:has been nominated for a
327:09:01, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
193:20:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
179:20:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
161:19:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
349:18:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
310:21:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
290:19:20, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
271:12:56, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
261:12:55, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
363:featured article review
246:22:45, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
316:Byzantine-Ottoman wars
550:of past discussions.
381:You watching my edits
296:Immortals (Byzantine)
256:the Iranica response.
42:of past discussions.
430:Dominicus Lampsonius
359:William the Silent
354:William the Silent
237:Roman Persian Wars
575:
574:
562:
561:
556:current talk page
332:Justinians Origin
281:I have to admit,
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
18:User talk:Iblardi
579:
571:
564:
563:
541:
540:
534:
367:featured quality
134:
115:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
587:
586:
582:
581:
580:
578:
577:
576:
567:
538:
383:
356:
334:
319:
299:
279:
253:
239:
214:
200:
132:
113:
96:With regards,
72:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
585:
583:
573:
572:
560:
559:
542:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
382:
379:
355:
352:
333:
330:
318:
313:
298:
293:
278:
275:
274:
273:
252:
249:
238:
235:
218:Simia pygmaeus
213:
210:
199:
196:
186:
185:
184:
183:
182:
181:
166:
165:
164:
163:
150:
149:
121:
120:
71:
70:Correspondence
68:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
584:
570:
566:
565:
557:
553:
549:
548:
543:
536:
535:
508:
505:
501:
500:
499:
496:
492:
491:
490:
487:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
476:
471:
470:
469:
466:
462:
461:
460:
457:
453:
452:
451:
448:
444:
443:
442:
439:
435:
431:
428:
424:
423:
422:
419:
415:
414:
413:
410:
405:
404:
403:
400:
395:
394:
393:
392:
389:
380:
378:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
353:
351:
350:
347:
343:
339:
331:
329:
328:
325:
317:
314:
312:
311:
308:
304:
297:
294:
292:
291:
288:
284:
276:
272:
269:
265:
264:
263:
262:
259:
250:
248:
247:
244:
236:
234:
233:
230:
227:
223:
219:
211:
209:
208:
205:
197:
195:
194:
191:
180:
177:
172:
171:
170:
169:
168:
167:
162:
159:
154:
153:
152:
151:
148:
145:
141:
140:
139:
138:
135:
130:
126:
119:
116:
111:
107:
106:
105:
104:
101:
97:
94:
92:
89:
86:
82:
79:
75:
69:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
568:
551:
545:
473:observation.
433:
384:
357:
335:
320:
302:
300:
280:
254:
240:
221:
217:
215:
212:type species
201:
187:
122:
98:
95:
83:
80:
76:
73:
60:
43:
37:
544:This is an
268:Azerbaijani
258:Azerbaijani
243:Azerbaijani
36:This is an
386:reference.
346:Bartebly62
174:problems.
125:harassment
569:ArchiveĀ 1
303:athanatoi
61:ArchiveĀ 1
324:Tourskin
287:Domitius
226:UtherSRG
547:archive
495:Iblardi
465:Iblardi
447:Iblardi
418:Iblardi
407:indeed.
399:Iblardi
251:Iranica
204:Iblardi
144:Iblardi
129:the wub
110:the wub
100:Iblardi
39:archive
427:edited
338:WP:POV
307:Miskin
277:Miskin
229:(talk)
190:Miskin
176:Miskin
158:Miskin
342:WP:RS
222:Pongo
16:<
375:here
371:here
283:this
224:. -
198:Note
133:"?!"
114:"?!"
504:Rex
486:Rex
475:Rex
456:Rex
438:Rex
409:Rex
388:Rex
377:.
90:,
87:,
558:.
432:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.