Knowledge

User talk:Igor B.

Source 📝

309:, since it may give you some pointers on how to approach subjects which you are directly involved in from a more unbiased perspective when writing Knowledge articles. I do hope this gives you some further information on how to make edits that are accepted by community consensus, and I would like to thank you for your continued work in improving this article. If you have any questions or concerns relating to Knowledge editing, or would like administrative intervention on a matter relating to the article, please do contact me or another administrator. Best regards, -- 305:, of interest to you for information on how articles must prevent a fair and balanced view of subjects; your removal of statements critical of the Bogdanov papers, for example, would thus slant the article somewhat in the favour of your point of view, which would clearly not be acceptable. In addition, you may find it of interest to read our guidelines on writing articles relating to oneself, 68: 25: 608: 264:. Regrettably, due to the revert war currently in progress over that page, I have had to adopt stricter enforcement of 3RR in an effort to bring it to a close. Please, do feel free to come back after the block has expires, but please, in the future, discuss the matter properly rather than reverting. If you need any help or assistance editing on Knowledge, feel free to contact me. -- 345:, as per the zero-tolerance policy currently in force on that article. Since I have blocked other editors of that article for similar violations, it would be somewhat unjust of me not to do the same in the case of your violations. I would like to ask you, however, to please refrain from making more than three reverts within 24 hours in the future. Best regards, -- 682: 649: 100:
account may as well stay permanently blocked. I'm a little concerned that the autoblocker might get you if you should happen to come in from the same IP as one of the permablocked accounts; please let me know if you should have any problems editing now or in the future, from lingering autoblocks or
16:
Hello, Igor. I see that you inserted a personal photo into the article, that's great. It should have a formal GFDL "tag" on its image description page (that you get to by clicking on the image in the article), and it should be personally inserted by you (not me), so could you do that, please? Don't
377:
All user accounts used by participants in the external controversy (involving the Bogdanov Affari) are banned from Knowledge pending resolution of this matter. The criteria for determining external involvement shall be a review of their edit history, it being presumed that if the vast majority of
186:
article. Could you do me a favor and provide me with a very brief (2 or 3 paragraphs) explanation in layman's terms of your and your brother's theses? I looked around a bit, but wasn't able to find anything suitable. Normally I wouldn't ask, but since you have such an extensive background in
164:
part which I have specifically ask you to back up. So you and other people here start taking me a little bit seriously, I have blocked you for 24 hours. When you come back, I expect you to address this sort of questions and raise problems in a constructive manner. Thank you.
300:
Dear Igor: Following your recent editing to Bogdanov Affair, and its subsequent reversion, I thought that I should explain to you the reason why the changes that you have made to the article have been reverted. You may find our policy document on article neutrality,
572: 674:
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to
719:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
143: 190:
Note that what I'm looking for is just a succinct explanation of the papers to provide context to the article about the whole controversy, not any discussion of the controversy itself. You can put it on my Talk page:
116:(though I hope you won't be in that situation again)! Doing that sets off the autoblocker and lengthens the block. I'm going to put a prominent warning and explanation about it to everybody, at the top of 590: 139: 77: 34: 120:, when I get the time. Please take a look at it when it appears, it'll have a useful link to the block log. Thanks again for registering this account. Best wishes, 620:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. 187:
bringing these subjects to everyday people (and since you obviously have the best idea of what the papers say) I thought you'd be the best person to provide it.
632: 709: 212:
Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be
81:, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. 38:, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. 382:
and related pages such as this arbitration that they are not Knowledge editors but persons involved in the external dispute. This group includes:
729: 17:
remove anything of what you already said on the page, just add {{GFDL}} or {{GFDL-self}}, whichever is more appropriate. {{GFDL}} expands to
733: 656:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 519: 505: 463: 421: 358: 322: 277: 237: 477: 449: 561: 302: 290: 109:. (A randomly chosen admin may not even have heard of the autoblocker; I'm a little unsure about the details of it myself.) 623:
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
713: 705: 699: 533: 435: 491: 84: 41: 159:
Igor, you have reverted again the article, removing significant content and restoring an unsubstansciated and doubtful
217: 96:
Thank you very much for editing from a name account. I assume you will be using this account only now, and that the
693: 355: 341:
Dear Igor: I regret that, once again, I have had to block you from editing for making 4 reverts within 24 hours on
319: 274: 234: 616: 573:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Regarding_The_Bogdanov_Affair/Proposed_decision#Ban_on_editing_Bogdanov_Affair
547: 407: 393: 280: 240: 213: 513: 499: 457: 415: 306: 294: 664: 509: 495: 453: 346: 310: 265: 225: 192: 106: 485: 471: 443: 439: 117: 555: 401: 97: 628: 481: 411: 125: 162: 657: 527: 397: 75:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the
32:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the
576: 221: 146: 102: 565: 467: 379: 371: 361: 342: 335: 325: 261: 250: 206: 183: 726:
Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
182:
Hi Igor. I'm starting to do a preliminary draft of sweeping (and neutral) edits to the
551: 541: 387: 257: 196: 121: 594: 523: 425: 224:
an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Thank you. --
607: 67: 24: 712:
justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See
256:
Dear Igor: You have been temporarily blocked for 24 hours, as you violated the
737: 160: 199: 166: 642:
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to
52: 537: 383: 144:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Regarding The Bogdanov Affair/Evidence
101:
whatever. If you can't get me, try for some computer-savvy admin such as
744: 597: 579: 564:), a new editor who has edited other areas, are banned from editing 364: 328: 283: 243: 169: 149: 128: 591:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Regarding The Bogdanov Affair
140:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Regarding The Bogdanov Affair
589:
The arbitraton committee has reached a final decision in the
606: 66: 23: 670:
to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
603:
File permission problem with File:PHOTO IGOR GRICHKA.jpg
721: 575:
is under consideration and may replace the total bans.
716:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
732:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 19: 692:If you believe the media meets the criteria at 60:hereby publish it under the following license: 8: 142:has been accepted. Please place evidence at 631:or another acceptable free license (see 536:) and all others who meet the criteria. 637:at the site of the original publication 627:make a note permitting reuse under the 195:. Thanks in advance for your help. 706:Knowledge:File copyright tags#Fair use 178:Claims of the Theses in layman's terms 568:, pending resolution of this matter. 7: 704:or one of the other tags listed at 550:), a regular Knowledge editor, and 14: 216:from editing Knowledge under the 680: 647: 303:Knowledge:Neutral point of view 291:Knowledge:Neutral point of view 220:, which states that nobody may 734:Media copyright questions page 571:A less restrictive injunction 78:GNU Free Documentation License 50:and {{GFDL-self}} expands to 35:GNU Free Documentation License 1: 745:15:17, 25 December 2010 (UTC) 714:Knowledge:File copyright tags 660:. If you take this step, add 598:03:35, 11 November 2005 (UTC) 205:Three-revert rule violation, 730:criteria for speedy deletion 580:19:07, 17 October 2005 (UTC) 365:16:11, 17 October 2005 (UTC) 329:12:08, 17 October 2005 (UTC) 284:00:43, 13 October 2005 (UTC) 244:20:36, 12 October 2005 (UTC) 58:I, the creator of this work, 617:File:PHOTO IGOR GRICHKA.jpg 370:Ban on editors involved in 200:16:39, 7 October 2005 (UTC) 170:16:03, 5 October 2005 (UTC) 150:15:35, 5 October 2005 (UTC) 129:16:35, 1 October 2005 (UTC) 760: 694:Knowledge:Non-free content 681: 648: 55: 378:their edits were to the 334:3RR violation block for 307:Knowledge:Autobiography 295:Knowledge:Autobiography 112:Don't ever try to edit 611: 71: 28: 614:Thanks for uploading 610: 177: 70: 27: 700:non-free fair use in 696:, use a tag such as 135:Arbitration accepted 118:Talk:Bogdanov Affair 289:A brief note about 728:, as described on 612: 193:User_talk:Bubamara 72: 29: 258:three-revert rule 218:three-revert rule 91: 90: 48: 47: 751: 742: 703: 687: 685: 684: 683: 669: 663: 654: 652: 651: 650: 352: 316: 271: 231: 107:NicholasTurnbull 53: 20: 759: 758: 754: 753: 752: 750: 749: 748: 738: 722:your upload log 702:|article name}} 697: 679: 677: 667: 661: 646: 644: 605: 587: 566:Bogdanov Affair 380:Bogdanov Affair 375: 372:Bogdanov Affair 347: 343:Bogdanov Affair 339: 336:Bogdanov Affair 311: 298: 266: 262:Bogdanov Affair 254: 251:Bogdanov Affair 226: 210: 207:Bogdanov Affair 184:Bogdanov Affair 180: 157: 155:Temporary block 137: 12: 11: 5: 757: 755: 678:permissions-en 672: 671: 645:permissions-en 640: 604: 601: 586: 585:Final decision 583: 374: 368: 338: 332: 297: 287: 253: 247: 209: 203: 179: 176: 174: 156: 153: 136: 133: 98:Igor Bogdanoff 89: 88: 82: 73: 63: 62: 46: 45: 39: 30: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 756: 747: 746: 743: 741: 736:. Thank you. 735: 731: 727: 723: 717: 715: 711: 707: 701: 695: 690: 688: 686:wikimedia.org 666: 659: 655: 653:wikimedia.org 641: 638: 634: 630: 626: 625: 624: 621: 619: 618: 609: 602: 600: 599: 596: 592: 584: 582: 581: 578: 574: 569: 567: 563: 560: 557: 553: 549: 546: 543: 539: 535: 532: 529: 525: 521: 518: 515: 511: 510:82.123.57.232 507: 504: 501: 497: 496:82.123.46.149 493: 490: 487: 483: 479: 476: 473: 469: 465: 462: 459: 455: 454:82.123.187.53 451: 448: 445: 441: 437: 434: 431: 427: 423: 420: 417: 413: 412:ProfesseurYIN 409: 406: 403: 399: 395: 392: 389: 385: 381: 373: 369: 367: 366: 363: 360: 357: 353: 351: 344: 337: 333: 331: 330: 327: 324: 321: 317: 315: 308: 304: 296: 292: 288: 286: 285: 282: 279: 276: 272: 270: 263: 259: 252: 248: 246: 245: 242: 239: 236: 232: 230: 223: 219: 215: 208: 204: 202: 201: 198: 194: 188: 185: 175: 172: 171: 168: 163: 161: 154: 152: 151: 148: 145: 141: 134: 132: 130: 127: 123: 119: 115: 114:while blocked 110: 108: 104: 99: 94: 86: 80: 79: 74: 69: 65: 64: 61: 59: 54: 51: 43: 37: 36: 31: 26: 22: 21: 18: 739: 725: 718: 708:, and add a 691: 676: 673: 665:OTRS pending 643: 636: 622: 615: 613: 588: 570: 558: 544: 530: 516: 502: 488: 474: 460: 446: 432: 429: 418: 404: 390: 376: 349: 340: 313: 299: 268: 255: 228: 211: 189: 181: 173: 158: 138: 113: 111: 95: 92: 76: 57: 56: 49: 33: 15: 577:Fred Bauder 249:3RR block, 147:Fred Bauder 103:Kim Bruning 85:disclaimers 83:Subject to 42:disclaimers 40:Subject to 468:Laurence67 440:CatherineV 710:rationale 633:this list 552:Ze miguel 629:CC-BY-SA 595:→Raul654 562:contribs 548:contribs 534:contribs 520:contribs 506:contribs 492:contribs 478:contribs 464:contribs 450:contribs 436:contribs 422:contribs 408:contribs 394:contribs 359:(e-mail) 350:Turnbull 348:Nicholas 323:(e-mail) 314:Turnbull 312:Nicholas 278:(e-mail) 269:Turnbull 267:Nicholas 238:(e-mail) 229:Turnbull 227:Nicholas 197:Bubamara 122:Bishonen 524:Luis A. 426:Igor B. 362:(cabal) 326:(cabal) 281:(cabal) 241:(cabal) 214:blocked 593:case. 482:EE Guy 356:(talk) 320:(talk) 275:(talk) 235:(talk) 222:revert 740:Kelly 658:here 639:; or 556:talk 542:talk 528:talk 514:talk 500:talk 486:talk 472:talk 458:talk 444:talk 430:talk 416:talk 402:talk 388:talk 293:and 167:Rama 126:talk 689:. 538:Rbj 522:), 508:), 494:), 480:), 466:). 452:), 438:), 424:), 410:), 398:XAL 396:), 384:YBM 260:on 105:or 724:. 698:{{ 668:}} 662:{{ 635:) 354:| 318:| 273:| 233:| 131:. 124:| 93:. 87:. 44:. 559:· 554:( 545:· 540:( 531:· 526:( 517:· 512:( 503:· 498:( 489:· 484:( 475:· 470:( 461:· 456:( 447:· 442:( 433:· 428:( 419:· 414:( 405:· 400:( 391:· 386:(

Index


GNU Free Documentation License
disclaimers

GNU Free Documentation License
disclaimers
Igor Bogdanoff
Kim Bruning
NicholasTurnbull
Talk:Bogdanov Affair
Bishonen
talk
16:35, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Regarding The Bogdanov Affair
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Regarding The Bogdanov Affair/Evidence
Fred Bauder
15:35, 5 October 2005 (UTC)


Rama
16:03, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Bogdanov Affair
User_talk:Bubamara
Bubamara
16:39, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Bogdanov Affair
blocked
three-revert rule
revert
NicholasTurnbull

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.