617:
status of ICAATS. They have also pointed to the fact that the government routinely provides certificates to ICAATS accredited non Indian students to enable them to transfer credits. Thus the legality issue has been settled by the governemtn. I have therefore removed the statment made by an earlier editor. (I think he was writing from an
American perspective. I am an Indian, and write from an Indian perspective). In fact some more of the stateements will be edited in the light of my recent investigations with the government and leagal agencies here in India."
884:
309:"the right of conferring or granting degrees shall be exercised only by a University established or incorporated by or under a Central Act, or a State Act, or an Institution deemed to be University or an institution specially empowered by an Act of the Parliament to confer or grant degrees. Thus, any institution which has not been created by an enactment of Parliament or a State Legislature or has not been granted the status of a Deemed to be University, is not entitled to award a degree."
268:
judged in the light of how it is perceived in it own country. Thus I propose to revise this (but no
American institution) that you have edited. However, I will wait for a day or two so you can tell me if I am doing wrong by correcting a western-centric assessment to an Indian-centric assessment with additional comments to show the difference between how the institution is perceived in India as well as in USA, and thus making it an NPOV article.
772:
122:
793:
is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us
153:
Thank you very much CaliEd for the less than warm welcome given to me. I am new guy among the editors, and I think you are supposed to only "correct" me whereas you have issued a "warning" and even a "threat" for a SINGLE act of correction I did on a single essay. I feel you are being unfair to me. I
610:
Quote: "It seemed to me that two groups of editors have come up with conflicting information. I therefore called up the education department and also my lawyer, and based upon the information supplied by them I have recociled the information from both the sides. I have also included reference to the
363:
My interest is in India. I am not a
Christian. I was drawn into this battle when I made edits to an Indian institution which happned to be Christian. However, I do not with to be part of this battle. You Christians are welcome to fight with each other and "hit" each other (your word) or destroy each
599:
I think I was unable to convey my intention properly. What I meant was that "I did an investigation and am posting on the basis of that. More information and documentation will be added soon". I hope it is clear now. I contact lawyers for my personal confirmation not for any legal action, nor did I
232:
I will leave a message for CaliEd as well. He(?) also used "rv." (revert) as an edit summary to describe the insertion of what seems to me to be extreme bias. This is also unacceptable. I will direct him to the talk page so that you two can work it out. I'm sorry you have had to deal with this sort
683:
Thank you for your 'explanation'. Unless a person indulges in vandalism, a warning to that person is a threat. There is no case of vandalism against me. I simply made corrections to one essay related to an Indian institution, and gave some information in the talk page, that is all. If the citation
627:
I also want to record my observation here that it seem many of you
Christian editors or editors from the so-called Christian countries seem to be having a mutual fued. I am not part of that. I am interested only in truth and fairness about "Indian" institutions. So I hope you will not drag me into
466:
You say, "I have never described anything as "hiting;". Fortunately, the Wiki keeps a record of all what one has written. As I said, I just happened to edit one Indian school and "met" you only to realize that some religious infighting was going on and I was caught in the midest of crossfire. I do
616:
Quote: "Dear MmM in the entry on ICAATS I am sorry I should have removed the clause about GAAP that was introduced by another editor. As I wrote earlier (see discussion related to that article) I had a discussion with several
Education Department authorities and they all have pointed to the legal
467:
not wish to be part of it. I do not wish to make any claims about things which are not part of my main interest. Do hit whatever you wish to "hit" (your word, and there is a record). I am no more interested in your explots related to
Christian institutions, and this is my last post on that topic.
267:
Trinity is an Indian institution, whereas your revert is totally US-centric. This does not do justice to an Indian institution as it is being seen through an
American lense, making the revert a POV that does not do justice to an Indian institution. Each institution, culture, and custom should be
207:
Having looked into this more fully, I want to let you know that, speaking as an admin, your edits to the article in question don't warrant the response given to you. That is a templatized warning for "blatant vandalism." You were not doing that. This is a content dispute that should be discussed
406:
You yourself describe your work as "hiting" and therefore I feel I would only be wasting my time. More so because you are "hitting" (your word) Christian institutions on the Wiki. I was drawn accidentally into making edits on one such institution. As long as you are trying to "hit" no amount of
852:
experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a
165:
Kindly notice, I am not a
Christain. I am an Indian. I only made one correction about an Indian institution and the Indian systems about which I know well. You do not have to be unfair to me or you do not have to bully me. Just a suggestion would have done. Also, I am interested only in a fair
751:
Thank you. I do understand your concern. My contribution has been mainly in welcoming and tutoring newcomers, which does not go to the mainspace but rather to talk pages. I will wait for the right time, though I have been able to spot many vandalisms to correct, and also to report some to
925:
159:
I am interested in anything Indian, and have already made contribution on a number of subjects. You, on the other hand, have been chasing only
Christian institutions, and it seems you felt adrenalin rushing when I made a correction in an instution that is
432:
No sir, I have never described anything as "hiting;" you are making things up. You have only editted one school on wikipedia (Trinity), you keep mentioning religion, etc. I think you are the person (or people) who have been removad data on the related
353:
I have been going through all the edits you made, and notice that some kind of a battle is going on among
Christian sects about which of their institutions is accredit and which is not. I use the term "battle" becuase you describe your work as
915:
315:
The Indian department makes clear: "It is emphasized that these fake institutions have no legal entity to call themselves as University/Vishwvidyalaya and to award ‘degree’ which are not treated as valid for academic/employment
171:
I also notice that you are making all your corrections Americo-centric. Please notice that USA is not the only country in the world and the essays in Knowledge needs to represent all the countries and their policies in a fair
935:
611:
government sites which the officers in the education department brough to my notice. I would want our Indian institutions, culture, religions, etc. represented properly and NPOV. India Gate 03:24, 31 August 2006 (UTC)"
930:
436:
As I wrote above, three days ago, "If you want to claim it is anything, but a diploma mill give a source!" You have not done so. You don't want to offer sources, that's fine- don;t expect the page to change though.
251:
Thank you sir for your help. I am a workaholic and would love to remain calm and make some substantial contributions to the Wiki. I welcome advice, correction, and guidance if my work is ever substandard or biased.
920:
640:
I am sure you are supposed to be civil to other editors and not mock them. Perhaps you are more senior on the rung, but this is definitely bad and uncivil behaviour on your part calling me Crazy nut.
622:
Of course if any of my posts need to be reverted, it is ok. I am here to learn and each piece of info which other editors pass on to me is a learning experience. I hope I am more clear now.
684:
was not sufficient or absent, you could have added the citration needed tag. Instead you issued me what was a plain threat. I assume Wiki administrators are not supposed to bully people.
69:. It is always wise to read the talk page of an existing article before making major changes on it. Even then, I typically ask if anyone minds that I make a change. Very often they do! ;-)
605:
Since you have responded in a threatening manner to a discussion I had with another person, I will quote the full statement in the next paragraph so you can check if I threatened anyone:
600:
imply anything more than what I wrote. Your letter is more in the nature of a threat. I am sure you are not supposed to do that to me. You are bound by a code of honour as much as I am.
154:
also think you are not supposed to threaten anyone. A single act of correction cannot be considered vandalism, I suppose, unless I write something very bad. I wrote only something good.
733:
Hi - I see your application for vandalproof, it's very unlikely to be success at present. One of the selection criteria is a mainspace edit count of 250, you current have 98.
407:
evidence would convince you. Moreoever, I am moving to my main area of interest which is India. I might come back to you you when you beging "editing" instead of "hitting".
93:
Thank you very much for the warm welcome. I hope to be learning much and contributing much. I am stunned Deepu Jospeh by the amount of work you have done on the Wiki
942:
656:, not a threat. I have no need to threaten you, I can simply block you from editing. The remarks on my Talk page were not written by me. Your investigation remains
541:
263:
Dear CaliEd you have reverted my editing of Trinity School of Apologetics and Theology to a previous edit. However, I wish to submit the following to you:
364:
other. I will confine myself to making contributions about India and other subjects which are of my primary Interest. I am proud of my motherland.
381:
I am not interested in your religion or nationalism. I want you to back up "None of your observations apply to religious education in India" with
53:
848:
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most
29:(a.k.a. thunderboltz). Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
841:
is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group
869:
857:
213:
531:
956:
819:
527:
that organize themselves around a central theme. I suggest you make contact with the following groups and ask for their opinion.
302:
865:
536:
905:
633:
Here is the insulting terminology you used about me "Crazy nut is talking about his lawyer and adding uncited things" at
129:
22:
321:
Seems cut and dry to me. Degrees without government recognition are not " valid for academic/employment purposes."
705:
Just a friendly reminder, the vandalism warning goes on the author's talk page, not the main page of the article.
138:
837:
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the
948:
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
128:
Welcome to Knowledge. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the
736:
699:
962:(user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
838:
798:
If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
47:
883:
818:
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see
556:
242:
221:
199:
60:
33:
524:
945:
that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
282:
190:. I hope that you two can resolve your differences, but if you need help doing so please check out our
317:
310:
104:
87:
26:
801:
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
706:
133:
73:
66:
43:
715:
Thank you! It was a mistake I discovered immediatly after posting. I will be correcting the error
742:
166:
representation of Indian institutions, and I am not interested in your religion that is not mine.
132:
if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered
752:
administrators where their intervention was needed. Thanks once again for your courteous reply.
547:
If you aren't able to get something worked out, another approach to take is an article content
967:
794:
in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
552:
238:
217:
195:
143:. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.
753:
716:
685:
641:
570:
468:
408:
365:
269:
253:
209:
178:
94:
498:"Fortunately, the Wiki keeps a record of all what one has written;" good, show me where.
233:
of thing so early in your time here, but outbursts do happen here. Thank you for staying
926:"Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
903:
message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the
288:
234:
187:
39:
103:
Thank you very much for the comments. Looking forward to more edits by you. Cheers! --
790:
666:
586:
548:
344:
Thank you very much. None of your observations apply to religious education in India.
79:
Again, welcome! And if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask - Just
661:
582:
578:
382:
191:
657:
574:
569:
Whatever your intentions, alluding to conversations with lawyers can get you in
499:
438:
386:
332:
322:
144:
911:
that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
737:
http://tools.wikimedia.de/~essjay/edit_count/Count.php?username=India+Gate
807:
294:
973:
873:
771:
756:
745:
719:
709:
688:
670:
644:
593:
559:
502:
471:
441:
411:
389:
368:
335:
325:
272:
256:
245:
224:
202:
181:
147:
107:
97:
118:
If you want to claim it is anything, but a diploma mill give a source!
121:
882:
813:
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
879:
RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
634:
291:
directory of higher education, which lists accredited schools.
81:
952:
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded
770:
120:
216:. If you need a neutral third party, I'm here for you two.—
943:
more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general
856:
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at
864:
and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying.
85:
to leave me a message; or add {{helpme}} to this page.
916:
Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
177:Kindly help me, but do not threaten or bully me.
136:, and if you continue in this manner you may be
853:dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
542:Knowledge:WikiProject Countering systemic bias
652:Actually my note to you was in the tone of a
8:
936:Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
628:this mutual fued seemingly among Christians.
114:Trinity School of Apologetics & Theology
303:India University Grants Commission Act 1956
285:UNESCO list of accredited schools in India.
186:I'm sorry that you felt bullied. We have a
573:. Your conversations with others are not
519:Accreditation and countering systemic bias
331:As for your sources, you have given none.
931:Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
921:Editor-focused central editing dashboard
635:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:JzG
7:
893:Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
839:current system we introduced in 2011
188:policy against being mean to newbies
141:from editing without further warning
581:. Several of your recent edits are
532:Knowledge:WikiProject Universities
14:
295:University Grants Commission list
766:
585:and are likely to be reverted.
537:Knowledge:WikiProject Education
907:2016 Community Wishlist Survey
757:03:34, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
746:08:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
289:Indian Department of Education
1:
874:04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
720:15:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
710:15:22, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
689:18:59, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
671:13:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
645:17:54, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
594:16:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
54:Sign your posts on talk pages
34:The five pillars of Knowledge
974:01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
830:New deal for page patrollers
560:15:16, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
503:03:29, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
472:03:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
442:03:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
412:02:54, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
390:02:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
369:02:35, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
336:20:47, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
326:20:25, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
273:11:39, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
257:06:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
246:06:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
225:06:10, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
203:06:01, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
182:05:56, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
148:04:40, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
108:06:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
98:02:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
990:
866:MediaWiki message delivery
662:reliable secondary sources
579:reliable secondary sources
56:using four tildes (~~~~).
42:, post a question at the
957:User wikipedia/RC Patrol
700:Guggi the magical fruit
660:unless referenced from
192:dispute resolution page
21:Hello, India Gate, and
887:
789:Hello India Gate! The
775:
763:New Page Patrol survey
523:We have groups called
313:
125:
67:Consensus of standards
886:
774:
307:
124:
297:of oversight groups.
941:Further, there are
664:. All clear now?
577:; you need to cite
549:request for comment
25:to Knowledge! I am
888:
860:New Page Reviewers
845:has been created.
780:New page patrol –
776:
126:
976:
963:
843:New Page Reviewer
827:
826:
822:
782:Survey Invitation
583:original research
981:
971:
961:
955:
951:
908:
817:
767:
590:
989:
988:
984:
983:
982:
980:
979:
978:
959:
953:
906:
896:
881:
834:Hi India Gate,
832:
785:
765:
731:
703:
588:
567:
521:
116:
90:
65:Take a look at
19:
12:
11:
5:
987:
985:
966:Best regards,
939:
938:
933:
928:
923:
918:
890:
880:
877:
831:
828:
825:
824:
815:
812:
810:to take part.
803:
802:
799:
787:
778:
764:
761:
760:
759:
730:
727:
725:
723:
722:
707:Wildthing61476
702:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
676:
675:
674:
673:
638:
637:
630:
629:
624:
623:
619:
618:
613:
612:
607:
606:
602:
601:
566:
563:
545:
544:
539:
534:
520:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
434:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
374:
373:
372:
371:
358:
357:
356:
355:
348:
347:
346:
345:
339:
338:
299:
298:
292:
286:
276:
275:
262:
260:
259:
230:
229:
228:
227:
205:
174:
173:
168:
167:
162:
161:
156:
155:
115:
112:
111:
110:
92:
86:
78:
77:
76:
70:
63:
57:
51:
36:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
986:
977:
975:
969:
964:
958:
949:
946:
944:
937:
934:
932:
929:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
913:
912:
910:
909:
902:
901:one-time-only
897:
895:
894:
885:
878:
876:
875:
871:
867:
863:
862:
861:
854:
851:
846:
844:
840:
835:
829:
823:
821:
814:
811:
809:
806:Please click
800:
797:
796:
795:
792:
786:
784:
783:
773:
769:
768:
762:
758:
755:
750:
749:
748:
747:
744:
743:Charlesknight
739:
738:
734:
728:
726:
721:
718:
714:
713:
712:
711:
708:
701:
698:
690:
687:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
672:
669:
668:
663:
659:
655:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
643:
636:
632:
631:
626:
625:
621:
620:
615:
614:
609:
608:
604:
603:
598:
597:
596:
595:
592:
584:
580:
576:
572:
564:
562:
561:
558:
554:
550:
543:
540:
538:
535:
533:
530:
529:
528:
526:
518:
504:
501:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
473:
470:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
443:
440:
435:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
413:
410:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
391:
388:
384:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
370:
367:
362:
361:
360:
359:
352:
351:
350:
349:
343:
342:
341:
340:
337:
334:
330:
329:
328:
327:
324:
319:
318:
312:
311:
306:
304:
296:
293:
290:
287:
284:
281:
280:
279:
274:
271:
266:
265:
264:
258:
255:
250:
249:
248:
247:
244:
240:
236:
235:calm and cool
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
206:
204:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
184:
183:
180:
176:
175:
170:
169:
164:
163:
158:
157:
152:
151:
150:
149:
146:
142:
140:
135:
131:
123:
119:
113:
109:
106:
102:
101:
100:
99:
96:
89:
84:
83:
75:
71:
68:
64:
62:
58:
55:
52:
49:
46:or ask me on
45:
41:
37:
35:
32:
31:
30:
28:
24:
16:
968:Stevietheman
965:
950:
947:
940:
904:
900:
898:
892:
891:
889:
859:
858:
855:
849:
847:
842:
836:
833:
816:
805:
804:
788:
781:
779:
777:
740:
735:
732:
729:Vandal proof
724:
704:
665:
658:unverifiable
653:
639:
568:
553:WAvegetarian
546:
525:wikiprojects
522:
320:
314:
308:
300:
278:My sources:
277:
261:
239:WAvegetarian
231:
218:WAvegetarian
196:WAvegetarian
137:
130:welcome page
127:
117:
105:thunderboltz
91:
88:thunderboltz
80:
61:Edit summary
48:my talk page
38:If you need
27:Deepu Joseph
20:
972:Delivered:
305:explains,
59:Provide an
899:This is a
820:NPP Survey
754:India Gate
717:India Gate
686:India Gate
642:India Gate
575:verifiable
469:India Gate
409:India Gate
366:India Gate
316:purposes."
270:India Gate
254:India Gate
179:India Gate
160:Christian.
95:India Gate
82:click here
591:you know?
587:Just zis
571:hot water
565:Watch it.
214:talk page
134:vandalism
74:User page
72:Create a
44:Help Desk
850:current
654:warning
212:on the
210:civilly
172:manner.
139:blocked
23:welcome
17:Welcome
557:(talk)
500:CaliEd
439:CaliEd
433:pages.
387:CaliEd
354:"hit".
333:CaliEd
323:CaliEd
243:(talk)
222:(talk)
200:(talk)
145:CaliEd
383:WP:RS
870:talk
808:HERE
301:The
40:help
791:WMF
667:Guy
589:Guy
385:.
283:The
970:—
960:}}
954:{{
872:)
741:--
551:.—
237:.—
194:.—
868:(
555:•
241:•
220:•
198:•
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
