22:
114:
200:
Thanks: tried searching for "non-notable" but
Knowledge didn't have a definition (oops) nor is the complaint linked to a specific definition. So I will take a guess that some Knowledge editors consider this entry *could* be somewhat irrelevant to readers (e.g. like mentioning a specific fern may not
36:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "
201:
be interesting compared to the generic definition of fern). So I added some statistics to make the entry (more) notable. However, I would appreciate some guidance on this topic...
43:
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
88:. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
44:
177:
181:
169:
125:
103:
173:
33:
81:
85:
74:
29:
185:
192:
58:
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.
152:
93:
54:
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the
156:
63:
21:
189:
139:
55:
48:
37:
89:
138:
While all contributions to
Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be
202:
121:
107:
59:
162:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
210:
195:
97:
67:
32:, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for
112:
20:
180:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
145:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
45:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of CEP vendors
8:
151:notice, but please explain why in your
17:AfD nomination of List of CEP vendors
7:
140:deleted for any of several reasons
128:because of the following concern:
14:
1:
98:21:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
68:20:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
184:allows discussion to reach
165:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
148:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
51:with four tildes (~~~~).
226:
80:An editor has asked for a
170:proposed deletion process
211:12:42, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
206:
28:An editor has nominated
196:15:29, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
157:the article's talk page
117:
47:and please be sure to
25:
182:articles for deletion
126:proposed for deletion
116:
56:articles for deletion
38:What Knowledge is not
24:
133:Non-notable product.
73:Deletion Review for
86:List of CEP Vendors
75:List of CEP Vendors
30:List of CEP vendors
174:deletion processes
118:
49:sign your comments
26:
104:Proposed deletion
217:
167:
166:
150:
149:
115:
225:
224:
220:
219:
218:
216:
215:
214:
178:speedy deletion
164:
163:
147:
146:
113:
111:
82:deletion review
78:
19:
12:
11:
5:
223:
221:
188:for deletion.
168:will stop the
136:
135:
110:
101:
77:
71:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
222:
213:
212:
208:
204:
198:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
160:
158:
154:
143:
141:
134:
131:
130:
129:
127:
123:
109:
105:
102:
100:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
76:
72:
70:
69:
65:
61:
57:
52:
50:
46:
41:
39:
35:
31:
23:
16:
199:
172:, but other
161:
153:edit summary
144:
137:
132:
120:The article
119:
79:
53:
42:
27:
176:exist. The
122:TIBCO Hawk
108:TIBCO Hawk
186:consensus
124:has been
190:UtherSRG
34:deletion
90:Bardcom
203:Isvana
193:(talk)
155:or on
40:").
60:BJBot
207:talk
94:talk
64:talk
106:of
84:of
209:)
159:.
142:.
96:)
66:)
205:(
92:(
62:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
