166:
university. At UNSW the faculty is not generally famous whereas the school is. Except for cases like the faculty of law which is in effect the school of law plus the school of taxation, very few faculties are well know. It is their schools such as the School of
Computer Science Engineering that get credited in the press and journals with discoveries. In my opinion the faculties, except for the small ones, are often purely administrative. This seems to differ right across Australia with Sydney having Faculties, UNSW having Schools and RMIT having Colleges and Schools. I probably don't have anywhere enough experience to decide whether to go with individual school articles or not but at the moment i think the redirect idea, at least until a school can have enough information to be a viable article, is great. Also point noted on the Vice-Chancellors in the template point. Thanks for your adivce!
140:
Faculties correspond to what an
American university would be more likely to call Colleges or Schools within the university. If so, the "School" level for USW is greater subdivision than is usually called for -- check the articles for the University of California or Columbia for examples of how it is generally done. We do have a few articles for individual academic departments, but only the very most famous--articles about others are almost always deleted. If you do have one or two such departments, that's one thing, but not
493:
349:
297:
241:
24:
510:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
165:
Hi thanks for your much valued input! I can understand what you are saying about our schools and indeed in some cases these schools are not worth noting. However UNSW is a very "school" based university as compared to somewhere in
Australia like the University of Sydney which is a more faculty based
139:
As one of the administrators dealing a good deal with university articles, I suggest that you not try articles on the individual schools. Terminology varies by country, but I think your schools correspond to
American Departments -- Department of English, Department of History, etc, and your
144:
the departments at USW -- or anywhere else -- are likely to be at that level. So what I'd like to have done is combine the articles and turn the present School articles into
Redirects. I can help you do that, if you like. And, by the way, you really ought to read
149:(on businesses and other organisations). Additionally, we don;t generally list individual people in the university template--rather, you ought to do an article "Vice-Chancellors of the USW", in which you can list them with links to their individual articles
375:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
323:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
267:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
76:
Yeah I'm slowly adding content to those pages and should be done by the end of the day. I thought that the schools were probably too much and was looking for a way to code it so the faculties could be expanded and closed. Any ideas?
379:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qwerty Binary
327:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qwerty Binary
271:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
411:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
62:
you've created. I like the idea of combining all of the various boxes into one, but I don't know that it needs to contain the names of all the schools; shouldn't the faculties be enough?
264:
372:
320:
455:
208:
because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the
213:
361:
309:
253:
522:
481:
59:
466:
436:
480:. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to
46:
Hey friend. Why are you creating so many articles with just a template? You should add content, or someone will probably delete them.--
477:
462:
459:
432:
205:
502:
423:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
209:
201:
506:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
428:
511:
365:
313:
257:
248:
232:
381:
329:
277:
96:
67:
356:
340:
450:
As an
Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of
30:
I try to do the right thing and strive to improve
Knowledge. If I make a mistake, please let me know.
424:
221:
400:
391:
273:
167:
106:
92:
78:
63:
420:
404:
304:
288:
419:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
530:
416:
408:
217:
146:
47:
412:
156:
507:
526:
534:
470:
440:
385:
333:
281:
225:
175:
160:
114:
100:
86:
71:
52:
151:
23:
407:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Knowledge
454:
into
Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place
491:
488:
Orphaned non-free image File:Oxford Falls Grammar Emblem.png
216:
if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
476:
This message has been automatically sent to all users in
265:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/UNSW School of Education
354:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
302:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
246:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
373:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/UNSW Vice-Chancellors
360:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
308:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
252:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
521:will be deleted after seven days, as described in
212:. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at
399:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
321:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/UNSW Chancellors
196:Possibly unfree File:OFGS Signature Shot 2001.jpg
458:, please read the proposal and comment there.
523:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
517:Note that any non-free images not used in any
8:
456:at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board
482:Category:Opted-out of message delivery
42:University of New South Wales articles
200:A file that you uploaded or altered,
7:
503:File:Oxford Falls Grammar Emblem.png
362:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
310:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
254:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
91:Sorry, not really my strong point!
14:
425:review the candidates' statements
371:The article will be discussed at
319:The article will be discussed at
263:The article will be discussed at
202:File:OFGS Signature Shot 2001.jpg
446:Fair Use in Australia discussion
347:
295:
239:
22:
17:
478:Category:Australian Wikipedians
206:Knowledge:Possibly unfree files
431:. For the Election committee,
401:Arbitration Committee election
392:ArbCom elections are now open!
1:
535:18:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
512:our policy for non-free media
441:13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
48:
282:05:57, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
427:and submit your choices on
386:02:26, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
334:02:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
550:
463:MediaWiki message delivery
460:MediaWiki message delivery
433:MediaWiki message delivery
492:
471:11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
226:21:02, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
176:10:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
161:04:49, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
115:06:19, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
101:03:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
87:01:21, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
72:00:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
53:19:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
364:or whether it should be
312:or whether it should be
256:or whether it should be
249:UNSW School of Education
233:UNSW School of Education
171:
110:
82:
497:
500:Thanks for uploading
495:
405:Arbitration Committee
357:UNSW Vice-Chancellors
341:UNSW Vice-Chancellors
210:file description page
204:, has been listed at
409:arbitration process
58:That's quite a big
498:
421:arbitration policy
36:
508:claim of fair use
484:
34:
33:
15:
541:
494:
475:
351:
350:
305:UNSW Chancellors
299:
298:
289:UNSW Chancellors
243:
242:
50:
26:
18:
549:
548:
544:
543:
542:
540:
539:
538:
525:. Thank you. --
490:
448:
429:the voting page
395:
352:
348:
345:
300:
296:
293:
244:
240:
237:
198:
105:All solved now!
44:
35:
12:
11:
5:
547:
545:
489:
486:
447:
444:
398:
394:
389:
346:
344:
339:Nomination of
337:
294:
292:
287:Nomination of
285:
238:
236:
231:Nomination of
229:
214:the discussion
197:
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
189:
188:
187:
186:
185:
184:
183:
182:
181:
180:
179:
178:
124:
123:
122:
121:
120:
119:
118:
117:
43:
40:
38:
32:
31:
28:
16:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
546:
537:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
515:
513:
509:
505:
504:
487:
485:
483:
479:
473:
472:
468:
464:
461:
457:
453:
445:
443:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
393:
390:
388:
387:
383:
377:
374:
369:
367:
363:
359:
358:
342:
338:
336:
335:
331:
325:
322:
317:
315:
311:
307:
306:
290:
286:
284:
283:
279:
275:
269:
266:
261:
259:
255:
251:
250:
234:
230:
228:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
195:
177:
173:
169:
164:
163:
162:
158:
154:
153:
148:
143:
138:
137:
136:
135:
134:
133:
132:
131:
130:
129:
128:
127:
126:
125:
116:
112:
108:
104:
103:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
88:
84:
80:
75:
74:
73:
69:
65:
61:
57:
56:
55:
54:
51:
41:
39:
29:
27:
25:
20:
19:
518:
516:
501:
499:
474:
451:
449:
396:
378:
370:
355:
353:
343:for deletion
326:
318:
303:
301:
291:for deletion
274:Stuartyeates
270:
262:
247:
245:
235:for deletion
199:
168:Irishroyalty
150:
141:
107:Irishroyalty
79:Irishroyalty
60:template box
45:
37:
21:
93:Tim Bennett
64:Tim Bennett
417:topic bans
413:site bans
218:Acather96
519:articles
452:Fair Use
366:deleted
314:deleted
258:deleted
147:our FAQ
403:. The
49:Patton
527:B-bot
531:talk
467:talk
437:talk
382:talk
330:talk
278:talk
222:talk
172:talk
157:talk
111:talk
97:talk
83:talk
68:talk
514:).
397:Hi,
152:DGG
142:all
533:)
469:)
439:)
415:,
384:)
368:.
332:)
316:.
280:)
260:.
224:)
174:)
159:)
113:)
99:)
85:)
70:)
529:(
496:⚠
465:(
435:(
380:(
328:(
276:(
220:(
170:(
155:(
109:(
95:(
81:(
66:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
