Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:JMF/Archive 3

Source 📝

276:
where your money will go in the event of your death, if there is not a valid will in place). This is a fantastic service that no one else offers and is completely free. The second feature (also free) provides access to tremendous databases that allow users to search for unclaimed inheritance. These are much needed and sought after services. They are extremely relevant to the topic, and they are properly identified as "external links." Moreover, this certainly is not "spam." Wiki users want the information. Having the links there does not diminish the article or its contents. The information is relevant and properly labeled as an external link. What is the problem??
227:. If you look at the template it suggests - quite strongly and obviously - that one should use it is such as way to be logical given the left/right stations displayed to the reader. North to South, or West to East. Euston and Watford (on the WCML were correct, as was Bushey and *some* of the others, but at some point further up the line they had got reversed. I was correcting that error. In fact "Previous" should normally be the next stop to the West or North, and "Next" the adjacent stop to the East or South. This is also more logical looking at the succession box for people who normally read left to right (as per English) -- 480:, if all's well (by which I mean I get a luxury cruise to the Carribean), I will look into tackling UAs. It could be a while mind! Give me a nudge in a month or so and I'll see what I can put together! I wish there were more users with cartographical skill, I'm actually self-taught out of frustration nobody else could take this on! 1139:
I assume you are talking about the squad template that is commonly used at the bottom of player articles - the one which lists players number and surname. My opinion is no. The squad template is for players who are eligble to play for the first team and who do so on a regular basis (obvoiusly this is
598:
Hello! I am the creator of the page on Jock Campbell and would like to add a note on his title (He is Lord Campbell of Eskan accordimg to his biography, which I own) but am not sure how to add to the talk page. Do I simple click on "edit" and add a comment? Thank you for your corrections, by the way.
271:
Hello again. I am very new to this, in case you can't tell. That said, I have read the wiki policies and I do not agree that the two links you deleted must be deleted. There is an argument to be made that they are "blatant advertising" as you said. However, advertising is not per se prohibited on
57:
Hi - noticed that you'd altered the stadium:mk article saying that the hotel might now be in doubt because of the M&S deal. What's the story here then? My understanding was that the hotel (which is part of the stadium itself) would go ahead whatever - they were just waiting for a chain to take up
1143:
With regard to the "Current squad" section found on the club pages, I am a fan of putting all players including those in or out on loan in the one section rather than having a separate section for loanees, but I can see advantages both ways. The wonderful thing about wikipedia is that if someone has
1106:
from articles relating to the borough (settlements, transport etc), but I will add that they are in ceremonial Buckinghamshire. I also believe that the naming policies we have at the moment are good enough, especially since they aid in geographical references. In other words I think that ceremonial
904:
ceremonial counties were introduced in the 1990s following the decision to create unitary authorities in places like Hartlepool, Leicester and Milton Keynes; for these purposes, Milton Keynes remains in Buckinghamshire. The list of ceremonial counties includes the metropolitan counties such as the
867:
Upon reading your remarks on my talk page again, you appear to be describing following naming conventions (which are an official policy) as "vandalism". No matter how "crazy" you think that may be, it's still following policy. I suggest you retract that remark, and if you disagree with the policy
72:
Hello. Thanks for the comments. I have been planning this one for a long time. I feel that Moot halls and hills could remain separate as they do both separately reflect the Moots themselves at different times in history. In Scotland things were rather different and I almost used Mote Hill instead -
275:
The InheritanceNetwork.org is the most comprehensive organization providing inheritance-related information on the web. It has two fantastic and unique features that wiki readers may be interested in. One allows you to calculate your inheritance (either what you will inherit from a relative or
1147:
On a similar subject, what are your views on the "Technical staff" section? I have reverted two edits on the MK Dons page which have included Dean Lewington in the technical staff as captain. I have reverted these as in my opinion the captain is a member of the "playing staff" not the technical
903:
article. To summarise, these "ceremonial counties" are not the same as the supposed "Traditional Counties" as you appear to be claiming. Essentially, the "Traditional Counties" ceased to exist in 1974, and I have no time whatsoever for the group of editors who constantly promote them. The
703:
Hello, John. It is interesting to me to find you by accident around Knowledge (XXG) (though I suppose we frequent similar aritcles, so perhaps it's not an accident). I live in California and my brother is absolutely obsessed with Milton Keynes...because he's one of the very (very, very) few
91:
Hello. Thanks for the info. Doops does seem very uptight. I have never come across someone with such subjective views. All part of the rich tapestry of Wiki I suppose. Funny how you put a lot of effort in and then get treated like a mass murderer. Lets see what happens next.
851:
is not what the disambiguator is, but how it was formatted. Whether the naming convention specifies boroughs, counties, unitary authorities or something else entirely should be used, the title should always use a comma rather than parentheses. This is why I moved it back.
452:
will forgive me for leaving their county's to the end.... it's been a massive project for me and taken all but a complete year!... What's sad is the forthcoming Local Government Act 2008/09 which will change some boundaries in some non-metropolitan counties... oh joy.
343:
I can't really do much about the size of the template due to the amount of detail and where feature are placed etc, as well as what the right one with eough coulumns etc. But i can adjust the image further. I think i know what you mean and so i will sort it out.
1035:, as I've suggested before. Perhaps you should suggest that for places that are clearly, and undisputedly, suburbs contained within the urban area of a particular town/city, the town/city name should be used as the disambiguator. (So, for example, 272:
wikipedia. Advertising can also be seen as providing useful and relevant information. Most of the wiki policies focus on prohibiting unrelated information and not allowing self-interest or bias to sway an article. These links don't do that.
421:
Regarding the "dubious tag", next moths Buses mag will have an article on them, so I may as well wait for that to come out and see if it says anything (and also get a more recent citation), rather than search through a lot of old copies!!
745:
Thanks for your comment, much appreciated. The subject is not an area I know a great deal about, but even so, it looks like some editors have been forgetting some pretty basic Knowledge (XXG) fundamentals and not citing adequate sources.
31:
Hello! I hope you are feeling great. With regards to your concern, I was following the rating of the football template (which I did not rate personally). If you are not satisfied with this rating, perhaps, you can change it to at least a
302:
References for the dates are now added. The station does have an interesting history, and it would be worth someone's time to add in a bit more detail plus a link for the disused line to Newport Pagnell. I notice as well that the actual
162:
No problem at all! And thanks for the thanks! I'm just sorry it took so long for me to get round to drawing it (I've been doing them since February!). Hope it helps in furthering your work to Bucks related content! Thanks again,
73:
however most Scottish authors do call them Moot hills. It is a strangely ignored topic & some archaeologists don't even consider that prominent hills could be moots. I may have an in depth look at Moot Halls at some point.
820:
I do not wish to be involved in an edit war, and so I am happy to wait until a third party makes a comment at the discussion page. I have put my argument as clearly as I think I can. I hope we can come to an agreement soon.
1111:- having MK in the article name for Olney makes it seem that Olney is a suburb of the town, which it is not). I am still interested in your argument however, so please resond on my talk page if you want to. 279:
One final note, according to wikipedia's page on advertising (I don't know how to link to it), "Advertising is a paid, one-way communication." By wiki's own definition, those links aren't advertising...
1095:. Using this defination, Slough is in ceremonial Berkshire, or Slough unitary authority, Abingdon is in ceremonial Oxfordshire (but not a UA) and Solihull is in the ceremonial county of the 444:
I don't know what I'll do when I've finished these maps! I have two more left for England, then I need to cleanup some of the few that weren't uploaded by myself (!). I hope the folk of
380:
I deleted the coordinates not because "them's the rules", but because "them's the way the software likes it". If anything precedes the redirect statement, the redirect doesn't work.
921:
on this subject states, if disambiguation is needed, then it is these ceremonial counties that should be used. If that doesn't narrow things down enough (as with the case of
652:
No, in the US the correct way to do it would be how you did, also. So they shouldn't have been mdashes in the first place. I was removing spaces from mdashes because of a new
1010:
I don't see how that template is "a mess": it links directly to all the relevant articles at their current titles. That's what it's for. And by your argument, why doesn't
246:
Hello. I received your recent message. Based on your comments, I have revised the links to be in accordance with the policies you referenced. Kind regards, vafiii
730:
If there is a barnstar for heroic copyediting in the face of adversity, consider youirself duly awarded! Great work on an article confounded by political dogma. --
82:
Hello. I haven't come across many references to Moot halls being built on Moot Hills. Most moots were too small and often not in a good place for a building.
138: 841: 1067:
Hi. I just want to clear up a misunderstanding you might have of me. I am not pushing for the traditional counties to be used, otherwise I would say
620:(i.e. {{Template:uw-vandalism1}}) :-) I have now fixed the template and reviewing the user's edits, so perhaps he will be blocked soon :-) Cheers, 549:
Thank you for explaining. I think that prod is the best way to go. Generally hoaxes are not speediable unless they are exceptionally obvious.
307:
is a bit sparse. I would invest time myself, but I tend to stick to my own territory when making "substantial" edits, i.e. south of Watford.
1107:
counties should stay on any disambiguation pages, as they are more general, especially when a borough and a town share the same name (e.g.
619:
Howdy :-) I used the {{uw-huggle1}} template. Normally, templates would add a stamp with the template name included into <!-- --: -->
137:. Hopefully someone should come along to calibrate and amalagamate this into the infobox syntax asap. In the meantime, it can be viewed 571:. Currently the article is tagged for a proposed deletion and if no one removes it, the article will be deleted in less than 4 days. 766:
Actually it is. It may not be governed by Bucks County Council but it is still in ceremonial Buckinghamshire. Using your argument,
735: 193: 900: 874: 801:
I do not know how to bring a subject like this to debate. If you really must, please feel free to do so. I'll comment later.
568: 406: 388: 261: 958:
is a unitary authority): articles on predecessor settlements of Telford requiring disambiguation live quite happily at
1015: 635: 731: 1036: 296: 130: 1032: 360:
In fact i found i could reduce the width by lengthening the template and putting some of the text on two lines.
848: 534:
seems to be a professional sports player, which is, in general, notable. Is there something that I am missing?
402: 384: 209:
Yeh it's something to do with the server that, I read a technical reason somewhere once but I've forgotten it!
1103: 922: 249: 1096: 1040: 1011: 963: 878: 365: 349: 333: 1076: 934: 775: 689: 322: 304: 767: 512: 918: 308: 1092: 959: 751: 604: 427: 312: 1116: 1048: 993: 955: 886: 857: 826: 806: 787: 1153: 1134: 930: 469: 361: 345: 329: 232: 979:
doesn't require any disambiguation at all, as it is clearly the primary topic for that name.
717: 685: 680:
Just a quick note to let you know (as a leading MK based editor) that I have left a note at
576: 554: 539: 473: 257: 653: 38: 1072: 681: 633: 508: 501: 490: 134: 120: 93: 83: 74: 747: 600: 449: 423: 1112: 1108: 1044: 989: 905: 882: 853: 822: 802: 783: 657: 531: 111: 102: 43: 17: 1144:
a differing viewpoint then they are quite free to provide valid info in either way!
1149: 1088: 656:
rule; I was assuming they were correctly used... thanks for fixing that. Cheers, ·
445: 228: 59: 1031:
Anyway, if you don't like the policy, you should propose a modification to it at
711: 572: 550: 535: 287: 253: 210: 200: 782:. Olney is in Buckinghamshire, and so I think the article should reflect this. 621: 484: 457: 173: 166: 151: 144: 1157: 1120: 1080: 1052: 997: 976: 950:
doesn't come into this at all. For instance, another comparable example is
890: 861: 830: 810: 791: 755: 739: 720: 693: 670: 642: 608: 580: 558: 543: 516: 495: 461: 431: 410: 392: 369: 353: 337: 316: 290: 265: 236: 213: 203: 178: 156: 114: 96: 86: 77: 62: 58:
the running of it. The M&S would be a seperate development on the site.
47: 1084: 947: 456:
Once "finished" however, I have promised a few local maps to some users:
437:
Re: Bolder boundary around UAs in the county maps (low priority request!)
951: 1068: 129:
You may be pleased to know that further to your communication on the
908:. So your examples of Croxteth and Castle Bromwich are irrelevant. 844:
about the general issue of how disambiguation should be used here.
899:
You appear to have not heeded my recommendation about reading the
465: 199:? I would have thought the template method is appropriate here? 141:. I hope it is well recieved!... just 15 more counties to go :( 401:
the redirect statement? ... sure, might as well give it a try.
954:(in the county of Shropshire for ceremonial purposes only, as 133:
talk page, I have completed a localised map for the county of
1043:.) This sounds similar what you appear to be advocating. -- 877:
thoroughly: they are modern-day entities as specified by the
507:
Why would a popular culture section be deleted as trivia? --
705: 704:
roundabout enthusiasts in the U.S. He created and maintains
225:"Orginally Previous was southbound and Next was northbound" 929:
district-level disambiguation should be used (so we have
868:
then start a discussion about it on the policy talk page.
708:. Also..I am a giant economics nerd :-). See you around, 383:
The coordinates made it a broken redirect. Now it works.
527: 108: 1102:As I've said, I will never remove references to 53:Stadium:mk hotel in doubt due to M&S deal? 27:RE: Article rating for Milton Keynes Dons F.C. 946:The 1967 establishment of Milton Keynes as a 847:However, the reason I moved the page back to 842:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject UK geography 8: 774:, as Reading is the unitary authority and 110:The above author is far from non-notable! 328:See reply. Btw, should i implement it? 676:stadium:mk article copyright violation 526:I would very much like to understand 7: 684:to highlight a copyright violation. 988:I hope everything is clear now. -- 441:Hello JMF! Thanks for the contact, 283:Thank you for your consideration. 24: 569:Knowledge (XXG):Proposed deletion 919:official Knowledge (XXG) policy 1135:User_talk:Zorro77#Paul_Mtichel 901:Ceremonial counties of England 875:Ceremonial counties of England 1: 1158:11:24, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 1014:sound like it should be near 432:17:39, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 411:18:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 393:18:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 370:14:38, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 354:14:26, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 266:23:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 237:23:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 214:15:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 204:00:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 126:Hello John Maynard Friedman, 840:I'm currently commenting at 517:15:36, 17 January 2008 (UTC) 496:02:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC) 338:18:38, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 317:18:37, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 291:06:37, 1 December 2007 (UTC) 179:20:14, 22 October 2007 (UTC) 157:22:47, 20 October 2007 (UTC) 97:20:18, 10 October 2007 (UTC) 1121:18:50, 28 August 2008 (UTC) 1053:21:44, 27 August 2008 (UTC) 1016:Bourne End, Buckinghamshire 998:21:04, 27 August 2008 (UTC) 891:00:33, 27 August 2008 (UTC) 873:Also, I recommend you read 862:00:15, 27 August 2008 (UTC) 831:20:38, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 811:20:09, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 792:19:21, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 115:17:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 87:10:06, 6 October 2007 (UTC) 78:10:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC) 63:09:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC) 48:08:33, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 1173: 1126:loanees on squad templates 609:17:03, 20 April 2008 (UTC) 1037:Handsworth, West Midlands 756:20:44, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 740:16:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 581:18:06, 5 April 2008 (UTC) 559:13:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 544:21:44, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 131:Template:Infobox UK place 849:Bletchley, Milton Keynes 797:WikiProject UK Geography 721:20:20, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 694:09:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 1104:Milton Keynes (borough) 923:Walton, Buckinghamshire 671:13:23, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 643:11:26, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 1148:staff. Your thoughts? 1041:Handsworth, Birmingham 1012:Stone, Buckinghamshire 964:Wellington, Shropshire 879:Lieutenancies Act 1997 762:OLney, Buckinghamshire 194:Milton Keynes parishes 185:Milton Keynes parishes 935:Walton, Milton Keynes 776:Wanborough, Wiltshire 732:John Maynard Friedman 189:Why have you substed 1140:fairly subjective). 1063:Government Structure 768:Caversham, Berkshire 1093:ceremonial counties 1091:. I instead prefer 960:Madeley, Shropshire 780:Wanborough, Swindon 770:should be re-named 530:. At first glance 1039:would be moved to 956:Telford and Wrekin 772:Caversham, Reading 615:Vandalism template 931:Walton, Aylesbury 925:, for instance), 470:East Renfrewshire 305:page for the line 297:Wolverton Station 268: 252:comment added by 1164: 719: 714: 668: 639: 631: 626: 567:By prod I meant 494: 474:Stockton-on-Tees 323:Varsity Line RDT 247: 198: 192: 177: 155: 46: 41: 1172: 1171: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1128: 1073:Buckinghamshire 1065: 838: 818: 799: 764: 728: 712: 709: 701: 699:How interesting 682:Talk:Stadium:mk 678: 658: 650: 640: 637: 627: 622: 617: 596: 591: 524: 505: 502:Newport Pagnell 481: 439: 419: 378: 326: 300: 244: 222: 196: 190: 187: 164: 142: 135:Buckinghamshire 124: 121:Buckinghamshire 106: 70: 55: 39: 37: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1170: 1168: 1127: 1124: 1064: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 983: 982: 981: 980: 970: 969: 968: 967: 941: 940: 939: 938: 912: 911: 910: 909: 894: 893: 870: 869: 837: 834: 817: 814: 798: 795: 763: 760: 759: 758: 727: 724: 700: 697: 677: 674: 649: 646: 636: 616: 613: 595: 592: 590: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 562: 561: 523: 520: 504: 499: 450:Worcestershire 438: 435: 418: 415: 414: 413: 377: 374: 373: 372: 357: 356: 325: 320: 299: 294: 243: 242:External Links 240: 221: 218: 217: 216: 186: 183: 182: 181: 123: 118: 105: 100: 69: 66: 54: 51: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1169: 1160: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1136: 1131: 1125: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1109:Milton Keynes 1105: 1100: 1098: 1097:West Midlands 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1062: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 999: 995: 991: 987: 986: 985: 984: 978: 974: 973: 972: 971: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 945: 944: 943: 942: 936: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 915: 914: 913: 907: 906:West Midlands 902: 898: 897: 896: 895: 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 871: 866: 865: 864: 863: 859: 855: 850: 845: 843: 835: 833: 832: 828: 824: 815: 813: 812: 808: 804: 796: 794: 793: 789: 785: 781: 777: 773: 769: 761: 757: 753: 749: 744: 743: 742: 741: 737: 733: 726:Fiat Currency 725: 723: 722: 718: 716: 715: 707: 698: 696: 695: 691: 687: 683: 675: 673: 672: 669: 667: 664: 661: 655: 647: 645: 644: 641: 634: 632: 630: 625: 614: 612: 610: 606: 602: 593: 589:Jock Campbell 588: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 565: 564: 563: 560: 556: 552: 548: 547: 546: 545: 541: 537: 533: 532:David Hallett 529: 522:David Hallett 521: 519: 518: 514: 510: 503: 500: 498: 497: 492: 488: 486: 479: 475: 472:and possibly 471: 467: 463: 459: 454: 451: 447: 442: 436: 434: 433: 429: 425: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 397: 396: 395: 394: 390: 386: 381: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 358: 355: 351: 347: 342: 341: 340: 339: 335: 331: 324: 321: 319: 318: 314: 310: 306: 298: 295: 293: 292: 289: 284: 281: 277: 273: 269: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 241: 239: 238: 234: 230: 226: 219: 215: 212: 208: 207: 206: 205: 202: 195: 184: 180: 175: 171: 168: 161: 160: 159: 158: 153: 149: 146: 140: 136: 132: 127: 122: 119: 117: 116: 113: 109: 104: 103:Marcus Binney 101: 99: 98: 95: 89: 88: 85: 80: 79: 76: 67: 65: 64: 61: 52: 50: 49: 45: 42: 35: 26: 19: 18:User talk:JMF 1146: 1142: 1138: 1132: 1129: 1101: 1089:Warwickshire 1066: 926: 917:Now, as the 846: 839: 819: 800: 779: 771: 765: 729: 710: 702: 679: 665: 662: 659: 651: 628: 623: 618: 597: 525: 506: 483: 477: 455: 446:Bedfordshire 443: 440: 420: 398: 382: 379: 362:Simply south 346:Simply south 330:Simply south 327: 301: 285: 282: 278: 274: 270: 245: 224: 223: 188: 169: 147: 128: 125: 107: 90: 81: 71: 56: 33: 30: 686:ColourSarge 376:Coordinates 248:—Preceding 1033:WT:NC:CITY 778:should be 509:Roleplayer 478:After that 458:Birmingham 1081:Berkshire 977:Bletchley 836:Bletchley 816:Edit Wars 748:SallyScot 706:this site 601:Arunadasi 594:Arunadasi 528:this edit 462:Middlesex 424:Arriva436 309:Ravenseft 68:Moot Hill 1113:Mpvide65 1085:Solihull 1077:Abingdon 1045:RFBailey 990:RFBailey 975:Anyway, 948:New Town 883:RFBailey 854:RFBailey 823:Mpvide65 803:Mpvide65 784:Mpvide65 638:contribs 417:MK Metro 262:contribs 250:unsigned 1150:Zorro77 1130:hi jMF 952:Telford 648:Dashes. 286:Vafiii 229:AlisonW 60:Zorro77 44:iva1979 34:B-class 1087:is in 1079:is in 1071:is in 1069:Slough 713:JHMM13 663:ndonic 654:WP:MOS 573:Jon513 551:Jon513 536:Jon513 288:Vafiii 254:Vafiii 211:Severo 201:Severo 94:Rosser 84:Rosser 75:Rosser 881:. -- 485:Jza84 466:Wales 399:After 167:Jza84 145:Jza84 112:Giano 16:< 1154:talk 1133:see 1117:talk 1083:and 1049:talk 994:talk 962:and 933:and 927:then 887:talk 858:talk 827:talk 807:talk 788:talk 752:talk 736:talk 690:talk 629:Vand 605:talk 577:talk 555:talk 540:talk 513:talk 491:talk 448:and 428:talk 407:talk 389:talk 366:talk 350:talk 334:talk 313:talk 258:talk 233:talk 220:WCML 174:talk 152:talk 139:here 36:. -- 1099:. 482:-- 165:-- 143:-- 1156:) 1119:) 1075:, 1051:) 996:) 937:). 889:) 860:) 852:-- 829:) 809:) 790:) 754:) 746:-- 738:) 692:) 611:) 607:) 579:) 557:) 542:) 515:) 476:. 468:, 464:, 460:, 430:) 409:) 403:DS 391:) 385:DS 368:) 352:) 336:) 315:) 264:) 260:• 235:) 197:}} 191:{{ 1152:( 1115:( 1047:( 1018:? 992:( 966:. 885:( 856:( 825:( 805:( 786:( 750:( 734:( 688:( 666:O 660:A 624:A 603:( 599:( 575:( 553:( 538:( 511:( 493:) 489:( 487:· 426:( 405:( 387:( 364:( 348:( 332:( 311:( 256:( 231:( 176:) 172:( 170:· 154:) 150:( 148:· 40:S

Index

User talk:JMF
S
iva1979
08:33, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Zorro77
09:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Rosser
10:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Rosser
10:06, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Rosser
20:18, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Marcus Binney

Giano
17:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Buckinghamshire
Template:Infobox UK place
Buckinghamshire
here
Jza84
talk
22:47, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Jza84
talk
20:14, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Milton Keynes parishes
Severo
00:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Severo

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.