User talk:JNorman704 - Knowledge (XXG)

103:. I saw on your userpage that you have some expertise on Silicon Valley, so your contributions are very welcome. Also, I realize that it may have been too blunt for me to revert your entire addition to the treatment of employees section. I have moved the criticisms back into the article for this and other subjects to enhance NPOV, and although I understand that there is significant coverage of alleged abusive practices, your balancing contributions look helpful and I will try to integrate them into the Corporate Culture section (a task with which you are welcome to assist). Thanks, 126:

far. Also, the entire 'Controversies' section of this article had been flagged for lacking a neutral POV, and I was attempting to adjust the tone a bit with my edits. In any event, as an outsider at Zynga, I feel there are a number of positive things about the company culture that deserve mention as well as the criticisms, to help give the story balance. I'm looking forward to collaborating with you to make this section even better.

2129: 26: 2610: 2558: 2393: 2341: 2160: 1851: 1421: 1255: 1001: 900: 623: 2506: 2450: 2293: 2240: 1908: 1577: 1524: 305: 223: 2057: 1780: 600:. So the Plagiarism charge seems to me to be unfairly targeting Morin. I felt that deleting it was justified based on this from WP:BLP: "Contentious material about living persons (or in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." 1634: 1965: 824: 673: 2627:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2575:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2410:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2358:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2177:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1868:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1440:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1274:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1020:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 919:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 642:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 748: 2662: 1479: 62:. However, I've noticed that whenever I do a Google search on her name, her husband Marc Andreessen's Knowledge (XXG) article shows up among her top results, but her own Wiki article is nowhere to be seen. I'm wondering what might be causing this and if there is a solution? Thank you for any help you can offer. 198:

If you add this to the dispute resolution board or anywhere else, please add a notice the page. But I don't really understand your position. Do you personally doubt that ResearchGate is actually sending spam (despite a lot of scientists complaining in public on the net using their real name and their

1062:

is mighty promotional, and I saw on your user page that you edit for pay sometimes. I reckon you know that per the Terms of Use you need to disclose edits that you make for pay. I looked through your last bunch of edits and didn't see any disclosures. Maybe you haven't edited for pay recently, or

579:

The first site, Gawker who has an affiliation with Lifehacker would be more or less biased but there rae clear examples such as the use of muffin covers. The other site I posted also pointed out with links to sites that holds no affiliation. You can dispute the neutrality but don't delete items that

125:

Hi RJaguar3, and thank you very much for your note. I was going to reach out to see about striking a balance with this section. Certainly Zynga has received some criticisms, but I believe there is a lot more to the story about working at Zynga than what has been depicted in the Zynga Wiki article so

2020:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

74:

Unfortunately, we do not control Google's searches on Knowledge (XXG) pages. Often times, Google's search engines may take longer than usual to list your page in their databases. Also, it may already be indexed but may appeal lower down in the search results. Try requesting that your page be added

1104:

that went into effect on June 16, 2014. On June 18, 2014, I disclosed on my user page that I sometimes do paid edits for some clients of the OutCast Agency. I have been of the belief that I am following the terms of use, in that they state disclosure is required in “at least one of the following

1066:

But generally, our practice since the Terms of Use were amended about a year ago, has been to ask paid editors, and other editors with a Conflict of Interst, to make a COI disclosure on their userpage listing articles they have edited for pay or for which they otherwise have a COi, as well as

2069:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1150:, so I thought it would be OK to add a few significant awards to the Cerner article. However, if you feel any of my Cerner edits don’t adhere to Knowledge (XXG) neutrality or other requirements, I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to collaborate with you to make sure they 1208:

I appreciate your civil response as well as the helpful guidance. I will make my disclosures clearer on my user page and follow up on the other stuff you suggested ASAP. Thank you again. BTW, I noticed on someone's user page that you are one of their Wiki heroes, and I can see

2532:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

2476:

2319:

2266:

1792:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1934:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1603:

1550:

1181:

is one of Outcast's clients" That is "employer, client, and affiliation". If you could put that on your User page (and list any other clients that you are editing in Knowledge (XXG) for) that would be ideal. I added the

595:

To further clarify, plagiarism is a serious charge to make, and the site Brit Morin founded, Brit + Co., is up front about being a 'content curator,' something Mashable says everyone on the Web is in the Pinterest era. See

2097: 1820: 2536:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

2480:

2323:

2270:

1938:

1607:

1554:

1141:

As far as the edits I have already made to the Cerner page, I didn’t intend for any of them to be promotional. For example, I had seen Knowledge (XXG) company articles with a mention or listing of awards, such as

1379:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1324:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1665:

This draft, especially the second paragraph beginning "Brett became president", reads as if its purpose is to praise Brett rather than to describe him neutrally. (Let the readers decide whether to praise

1223:

That is kind of you to say. I seem to evoke strong feelings - there are people who wish I would leave and never come back too. But it is always a happy thing to get positive feedback, so thanks again.

2081:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1804:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2473: 1739:, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the 1177:

Thanks for your very civil response! Always nice, when this conversation goes professionally. So the spirit and letter of the ToU calls for something like: "I an employee of the ], and

1132:

Regarding Cerner: I had neglected to update my user page with a disclosure of those recent paid edits. But I have now done so, as well as disclosed the paid edit on the Cerner talk page.

1741: 1070:

Would you be willing to make such a disclosure on your user page? Also, are you/will you receive compensation from Cerner (or their agents) for edits to the Cerner article? Thanks!

2682:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --

1123:

That said, I totally understand the reason for your request. Going forward, I pledge to disclose all paid edits (a) on my user page and (b) on the talk page of the relevant article.

1499:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

1105:

ways: a statement on your user page, a statement on the talk page accompanying any paid contributions, or a statement in the edit summary accompanying any paid contributions.”

1931: 1114:

In other words, the terms state I must disclose in one of those three places, which I have done regarding OutCast, and that disclosing more than that is not a requirement.

2316: 539: 535: 2677: 2263: 1668:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

1190:

template to the talk page header, which will make it easier for you to post "edit requests" formally - the formal way includes a tag that posts a notice to the

349: 199:

spam even being archived in public email archives)? Or do you just think this should not be reported on Knowledge (XXG) because there are only primary sources?

2133: 1729: 1600: 1547: 1494: 2518: 2462: 2305: 2252: 1920: 1589: 1536: 968: 549: 478: 425: 168: 1998: 415: 1054:

Hi JNorman704. I work on conflict of interest issues in Knowledge (XXG) - I also work a lot on article related to health, which is how we overlapped at

263: 411: 2639: 2587: 2529: 2422: 2370: 2189: 2002: 1994: 1954: 1880: 1654: 1452: 1286: 1032: 931: 654: 2001:

how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the

964: 545: 474: 421: 164: 2111: 1834: 1404: 1349: 468: 158: 2025:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 1650: 1640: 1621: 464: 45: 2673: 2137: 1490: 154: 1702: 1658: 2107: 1830: 1400: 1345: 2090: 1974: 1813: 1751:, a friendly space on Knowledge (XXG) where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 1646: 542:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 471:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 418:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 161:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1183: 961:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 848: 697: 388: 368:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

282:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

2623:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2571:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2406:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2354:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2173:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1864:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1436:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1270:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1016:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 915:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 638:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2628: 2624: 2576: 2411: 2359: 2178: 2022: 1869: 1441: 1275: 1021: 920: 643: 311: 229: 511:

Can you provide the context of the picture you set on wk.fr, date and place, so that I can upload the caption ? Thanks,

2522: 2466: 2309: 2256: 1924: 1593: 1540: 1391:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1336:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2102: 1825: 1396: 1341: 1012: 1981: 1486: 2350: 953:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

527: 526:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

455:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

402:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

369: 355: 283: 269: 145:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

59: 1186:

tag to Cerner talk page so you don't have to worry about making further COI disclosures there. I also added the

1756: 1712: 1643:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

2402: 1432: 1266: 1091:, Thank you for your message and questions, and my apologies for the slow response. I’ve been out of the office. 2078: 1801: 634: 2169: 1187: 2669: 772:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

204: 2006: 2567: 1462: 883: 732: 304: 222: 2619: 1860: 1392: 1337: 911: 1944: 1610: 1557: 316: 234: 1747: 365: 279: 49: 1915: 1899: 580:

you simply disagree with. Deletion should be the last thing done and only after there is a consensus.

1752: 1708: 1676: 1625: 1294: 808: 2065: 1788: 1770: 1368: 1359: 1313: 1304: 581: 2486: 585: 249: 84: 2247: 2231: 2074: 1797: 1388: 1372: 1333: 1317: 403: 382: 200: 113: 2037: 1745:. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the 1504: 1457: 984: 939: 879: 828: 728: 677: 565: 494: 441: 184: 2086: 1809: 1384: 1376: 1329: 1321: 1191: 2540: 2430: 2145: 1997:, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not 1940: 1229: 1199: 1075: 32: 2089:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2082: 1812:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1805: 1387:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1380: 1332:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1325: 835:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

684:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

2647: 2595: 2378: 2300: 2284: 2197: 1888: 1657:. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid 1290: 1210: 1164: 1040: 853: 804: 800: 752: 702: 601: 127: 63: 2572: 2407: 2355: 2174: 1865: 1437: 1271: 1017: 916: 639: 2482: 871: 720: 80: 1993:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

2325: 2272: 2220: 975:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

658: 556:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

485:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

432:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

378: 175:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

107: 76: 2683: 2032: 1500: 1101: 980: 976: 935: 840: 561: 557: 490: 486: 437: 433: 407: 180: 176: 2056: 1779: 1728: 25: 352:. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 266:. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 2426: 2141: 2021:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1225: 1195: 1088: 1071: 788:

http://news.cnet.com/KPN,-Qwest-team-on-European-network/2100-1033_3-218186.html

512: 460: 343: 333: 323: 1633: 799:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

2643: 2591: 2457: 2441: 2374: 2193: 2017: 1990: 1958: 1884: 1584: 1568: 1531: 1515: 1036: 870:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

719:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

531: 359: 260:

were produced in a garage using 44 pounds (20 kg) of clay and 400 toothpicks?

1147: 1143: 456: 597: 273: 2216: 1973:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

958: 954: 255: 241: 146: 2688: 2661: 2651: 2599: 2547: 2490: 2434: 2382: 2330: 2277: 2224: 2201: 2149: 2115: 2093:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2044: 1948: 1892: 1838: 1816:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1760: 1716: 1614: 1561: 1508: 1478: 1468: 1408: 1353: 1298: 1233: 1218: 1203: 1172: 1079: 1044: 988: 943: 887: 812: 736: 661: 609: 589: 569: 515: 498: 445: 392: 208: 188: 135: 120: 88: 1375:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

1320:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

761: 689: 150: 2012:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

2513: 2497: 1194:

page where more people see it, and can respond to it. Thanks again!

1178: 1055: 794:

http://www.v3.co.uk/v3-uk/news/1948688/qwest-snaps-eunet</ref: -->

765: 2005:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about 2474:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Brit Morin (2nd nomination)

339: 100: 2096:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

1819:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

1675:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

1703:

Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors

299: 217: 20: 2660: 2608: 2556: 2391: 2339: 2211:

I wonder if you forgot to declare paid editing on Acumatica

2158: 2027: 1963: 1849: 1632: 1477: 1419: 1253: 999: 898: 621: 328:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 246:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 1067:

disclosing the conflict on the relevant article talk page.

2517:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

2461:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

2304:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

2251:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

1919:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

1588:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

1535:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

2140:

incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.

1682:

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the

994:

Orphaned non-free image File:Brit + Co. company logo.png

2511: