User talk:Jamesmaharrison - Knowledge (XXG)

1758:

or marketing manager for Caxton. If this is a case, you are in direct violation of Knowledge (XXG)'s terms and conditions. I am not going to publicly post the evidence - however - a public search for combinations of your username, the company name Caxton and approximations of a clear name derived from the username lead very quickly to a marketing agency, one of its directors and a twitter account of that person, from which posts about Caxton have been made. Other sources connect this marketing agency and Caxton. Your claims of being a "learner" are not credible, if you are, I will certainly not assist commercial editing efforts. Previous pages have rightly been deleted. Not by me, btw, but by volunteer administrators of Knowledge (XXG) after reviewing various sources.

3400:) via this page and directly - only to be ignored or offered no guidance as to how to resolve this. I have now written a letter to the Wikimedia and the Foundation asking for some guidelines. I am aware that I indirectly and without intent broke some of the Wiki regulations especially with regard to logging in - but have explained this. I am also now well versed in working within the guidelines. however the Admin in question does not want to know or help! Is there a way I can get this resolved. In addition, it seems that that I am not the only one to be impacted by anonymous bullies hid behind the admin label - see 1808:

time to time; interview with CEO - not neutral/PR; news about investment rounds - investments are a given; executives talking about topical points - again a given as part of their job and probably elaborate PR). What ORGCRIT looks for is essentially significant and sustained independent editorial coverage in notable sources. For example, an FT editor analysing their annual report. Editorial in the Guardian that discusses the company in a boarder context (though more than a mention in passing as part of a list of companies), etc. Republished press-releases are insufficient.

1775:

allowed to write something - even if it is objective. I thought it was the Objectivity that was key? Please don't take this the wrong way and I don't want to sound like an argumentative arse, I am honestly looking for guidance to feedback, but if we don't start the page and open it up for others to edit and amend - how is a page supposed to appear? is Caxton allowed to write their own? Other pages I have written I have done in my spare time and with no association but was just looking to get this started? do you have any thoughts on this? thank in advance fro you help

2823:

was a technical issue. I realise this was a huge red flag now. Also I have been clear in the above conversation about the contributions and how I want to add - this is not just about the knowledge I have but also as I want to be able to add more varied contributions. I am happy to work with someone and take any additional advice but also keen to try and move forward. I have made the request to work with people above but with no response. Please can you un block me. I look forward to resolving this and moving forward

1738:

way we can work together to help me write pages in a way that are not immediately deleted by you? I want to learn how it's done and have been following the guidelines but for some reason you still delete them. As the expert I - and from what I can see on your profile others too - am asking for your help and guidance and not just a link to an article that I have read and then delete my content regardless - please provide helpful feedback for me and others. I really look forward to hearing from you.

2714:

incorrect info . Similar to yourself, you are an expert in moderating the site - and clearly have been doing so very well for several years - I don't see that as a conflict of interest when dealing with issues? I would be very happy to work with you to ensure that you see no conflicts - I am trying to be as transparent as possible - Perhaps with your direction this can be the last time this sort of issues arises for me? I am asking for your help

187: 1839: 781: 3482:

encyclopedia, not your personal ones. Strikethrough the insults targeting admins and refrain from making more. Many people have gotten second or third chances for actions far worse than anything you did, but at some point, they all had to make the case that they would be a net positive for the encyclopedia. If you actually do that, you'll find admins are quite willing to give chances, sometimes to a fault.

3310: 3129: 2737: 2522: 2320: 2180: 2036: 892: 557: 366: 1690: 1054: 1953: 1865: 1520: 1420: 1320: 1791:) and clearly state on your user page and on the article's talk page that you have a conflict and what your relationship is. You may suggest new articles via AfC (which is where the Caxton article is now). You may suggest changes to be made to existing main space articles by posting the suggested change on their talk pages. Do not edit the article about Lee-Browne directly. 1153: 836: 800:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 334: 295: 631: 598: 440: 407: 3090:. As you will see in the above conversations I am well aware of the parameters to make contributions despite my previous error that got me blocked. I have been clear on what I am doing and it would be great to get my account un blocked so i can continue to Contribute in the right way! I look forward to a speedy resolution 3481:

If you're actually frustrated you can't post, then you'd best be served by acting in a manner that is more likely to result in you posting again. Acknowledge that you won't attempt to create a page about a family member. Indicate what edits you like to make that serve the interest of making a quality

3469:

If you want to get unblocked, you're going about it in exactly the wrong way. First, you'll have a very hard time finding an administrator who will allow you to create a page about a family member under these circumstances. You're far more likely to get another chance from an admin if you agree *not*

3215:

Please can I get my account unblocked - see conversations above on my page and I am now very clear on how I was tagged - I have read all the documents and just want to start contributing again. I have tried to reach out to the admin @sirsputnik several times but not had any response. I have asked for

2125:

in 2019 but I have not logged in to my account for several years. Also I have often commentated on leaders in the Fintech and natural resources space. Please can I have my ban lifted as I want to start adding to pages again as I feel I have a lot to add. Also I feel there has been a mistake as I have

1757:

The more concerning question, which you have not responded to yet and which has been raised by several people, is if you are connected or received payment from the subject - directly or indirectly. There is an overwhelming case to be made from public sources that you act in a capacity of social media

1609:

left a message regarding a possible conflict of interest. I do agree with him that there are strong indications of conflicted editing. A response would be much appreciated. I shall also move the Caxton article to draft because a) it does not conform to wikipedia standards as it is written, b) it does

723:

I've explained the use of it on my talkpage. A redirect and a bunch of people's talkpages and internal records does not remove its 'orphan' status. At this point, while I am still assuming good faith on your part regarding this removal my assumption is wearing thin. Do not remove it again, please.

3395:

despite numerous attempts over the last month I am still blocked as an editor / contributor. This is very frustrating as I want to add some content and comments and also submit a page up about my grandfather who was a leading administrator and charitable benefactor in the cricket world, Business and

2667:

thanks for getting back to me - To answer your question, I wanted to add information on a number of the open banking and neo bank solutions as well as the global regulatory bodies. I am often asked for information about the regulators and different types of licences companies can apply for. Also it

2607:

I wanted to go in and start adding some content for some fintech stuff - you can look me up f you want and i have been working int eh UK fintech space for the last 5 years at some high profile businesses - all I want to do is add some detail to so some pages that i have insights into. In addition io

2265:

User:Yamla As mentioned earlier I was blocked on my account so I wanted to see if I could register under a different email to see if that was blocked and there was something up with the page - alas I also fell foul by complete accident of the multiple user rules - I am sorry I didn't know this - I

517:

asking for some help here and also some help from user Mabdul about this. its a really simple thing i am sure but i want to get is sorted. what code do i need to pu withteh photo to make sure that it remains on the page? some help would be much appreciated as the links that have been given to me are

2845:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword

2822:

further to the conversations above I have been though all the Knowledge (XXG) guidelines and advice pages and can now understand why I was initially blocked - especially for trying to use multiple log in accounts - however this was not done to navigate around the system but more to understand if it

2671:

Some of the information on the Wiki pages is unclear and I would like to add to help clear it up as best i can. I also want to comment on some of the related banking technology pages and how the technology is evolving using the citations and well with in the Knowledge (XXG) policy. I don't have any

3477:

You're asking for an unblock, which requires an admin to trust you. Instead, you throw out insults. Sir Sputnik was very clear about the problem in your last declined unblock request, yet you seem to have completely ignored the substance of what he told you both in terms of policy and that someone

3273:

have placed myself, given that one of the main purposes of that process is to allow for review by a different administrator. Finally, given that you are still proposing to write about subjects where you have a clear conflict of interest, I don't realistically see you being unblocked any time soon.

3030:

HI There, I still seem to be blocked despite the above? I am keen to update and contribute to a few pages regarding cricket and the history of the game etc.... As well as related charities - all as mentioned above. Can you please unblock my page as i am aware of all the requirements now needed to

2004:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

1916:

1794:

This aside, the Knowledge (XXG) community is very active in certain areas. Finance is one of them. I would normally expect unrelated editors to create articles about people and companies if they are noteworthy. This may be my humble opinions, however in all the installments of the Caxton article I

1786:

Thanks for this. Paid editing does not per-se exclude you from participating in Knowledge (XXG). Your are correct in your assumption that one of the reasons why those policies are in place is to ensure that articles are written from a neutral point of view. If you have a conflict - even if you are

1774:

thanks for the clarification - yes I work for a marketing agency that has a relationship with Caxton so I will stop immediately trying to get this published. It was an honest oversight as having read the rules I didn't realize that if you have an association with the company or subject you are not

1737:

I am not sure why you keep deleting all my posts and now have questioned my authenticity - as you will see I have responded to your accusations! In addition, it is hard to learn how to do this better if you do not ever give me the chance to amend the pages so "you" are happy with them? Is there a

1575:

1471:

1371:

1105:

3272:

Regarding your email, so long as you have access to this page please keep your unblock requests public. I have provided the feedback Deepfriedokra was asking for elsewhere. Procedural issues like the one above notwithstanding, I will, as a general rule, not evaluate requests to lift blocks that I

1807:

as "checklist" for notability. In a nutshell, mere existence of a company is not sufficient. Media coverage that is in the form of "business as usual coverage" is not sufficient (e.g. company is FCA registered - that's a given; company launches new product - all companies launch new products from

1714:

been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Knowledge (XXG) policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the

2678:

Finally I am also keen to update and increase my own status on Knowledge (XXG) as I don't like that I have been labelled in this way and would be really grateful is you can help and provide some tips and guidance on how to improve my current status. I love Knowledge (XXG) and have been a huge

1811:

If you want to get this article over the line, add more editorial coverage that goes beyond PR and business-as-usual, make sure every statement is supported by independent coverage and show it. Remove puffery (being the first regulated under a new regulation is puffery. That's not a noteworthy

215: 2713:

I would have thought that having the experience in the industry makes me more insightful - sorry to be a pain but can you explain how that gives me a conflict of interest. Surely Knowledge (XXG) wants people who know what they are talking about adding content rather than people who are adding

206:

Before it can be added to Knowledge (XXG), your submission should have references. All articles on Knowledge (XXG) should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is

135:. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Knowledge (XXG), and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. 81:. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Knowledge (XXG), and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. 27:. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Knowledge (XXG), and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. 3051:

Please see the conversation above. Please can you unblock me so that I can start contributing again - i am keen to get back to this and also understand the parameters for doing so. I am also very keen to run stuff past you to make sure it is all OK? thank you in advance

3478:

else would have to review the request. And then you threw out a link to a Reddit page from a year ago in which a handful of people made unsubstantiated accusations about Knowledge (XXG) admins. Your actions are simply making it less likely any admin will trust you.

227: 223: 222: 226: 225: 224: 3291:) thank you for you response. However i am not trying to write about anything that i have been blocked for, I have been clear and open about what I want to contribute to - philanthropy, sports, history and setting up a page for my grand father. 1787:

not editing an article as part of a direct client assignment or pitch or whatever - you may be subconsciously biased. Hence the disclosure requirement. You are welcome to edit in accordance with policy if you follow the disclosure process (see

2694:

You may make a new unblock request for someone else to review. You said above you "have been working int eh UK fintech space for the last 5 years at some high profile businesses" so you absolutely have a conflict of interest in your field.

623:

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to

432:

1094:. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. 668:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in

477:

2473:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Jamesmaharrison". The reason given for Jamesmaharrison's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: w:en:Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Jamesmaharrison".

2516:

I am just trying to log in from home - i wanted to see if i could log in under a different account or if i had been blocked for no apparent reason - i was trying to use another account and that was blocked. please up block me

1985:, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read 1897:, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read 1452:, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read 1352:, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read 1753:

Thank you for your statement in the investigation about sockpuppetry I have opened. An administrator will review behavioural and technical evidence, such as non-public IP logs, to make a determination on the use of multiple

220: 219: 216: 221: 218: 1815:

Given the scope of the editing and in light of your partial disclosure, I will bring the Lee-Browne and Caxton articles to the attention of the conflict of interest noticeboard for community input.

3426:

You will not be unblocked to edit about your grandfather. Your unblock request does not make it clear what else you plan to edit about. Calling admins anonymous bullies also does you no favors.

1710:, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Knowledge (XXG) administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you 2266:

am just trying to use the knowledge I have built up commentating on the fintech space to add to some of the pages in existence and also raise awareness of other key issues and regulations.

3485:

If you continue to make tenuous unblock requests, the most likely result is that someone removes your talk page access. This would not be beneficial for you because once you can only make

1008:, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the 1010: 1157: 311: 2675:

There are also a number of amazing people beyond Finance - I have recently spoken to who have done great things in the philanthropic space that I believe people should know about.

1305:

Thanks Beeblebrox - ill do that - then I presume I can submit it for publication - I also want to do Julies restaurant, the previous owner and few others - I love doing this stuff!

1703: 1707: 199: 756: 521:

In addition, i have also saught permission from both the subject and the publisher for the use of this image and it has been said that they are all comfortable with it.

1235:

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see

2668:

is important for the public to be aware that some of the best known providers have a more complex regulatory framework that should be more within the public domain!

1168:(COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the 933:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

569:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. 378:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. 581: 390: 751:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

217: 1843: 998: 658: 467: 302:. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the 3462:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

3350: 3265:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

3169: 2909:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2777: 2657:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2562: 2426: 2368: 2311:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2220: 2171:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2076: 253: 3470:

to do that. You announce that you're suddenly fluent in guidelines, but the paragraph right before is a good indication that you're *not* well-versed about

252:

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can

1702:

by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Knowledge (XXG) account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at

1553: 839:

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Knowledge (XXG). This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to

3086:{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello despite a number of conversations with different admins my account is still blocked. The original block was put in place by @ 3109:

It would be great to get my account unblocked a it seems that I am not getting any response right now - can you help or shed some light on the delay (

1982: 1942: 1894: 1854: 1557: 1549: 1509: 1449: 1409: 1349: 1309: 1236: 1043: 912: 812: 678: 487: 3294:

In addition in wrote to you direct as I have posted several times asking for help and direction with no response - how am i able to expedite this?

3404:. There seem to be lots of chat conversations about this. I look forward to getting a better understanding of the process and a speedy resolution 2623:

with "fintech" so you need to tell us how your future edits will align with policy as well as if there are other topics you want to edit about.

1556:

how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the

142:, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on 88:, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on 34:, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on 3447: 3250: 2894: 2872: 2642: 2296: 2156: 844: 686: 495: 260: 143: 89: 35: 3345: 3164: 2772: 2557: 2420: 2363: 2215: 2071: 1161: 1666:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge (XXG)'s 1242:

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

605:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 414:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 2009:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 1921:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 1580:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 1476:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 1376:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 1228: 1110:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 1091: 908: 879: 748: 528: 3216:

help and offered to have all my contributions reviewed in advance but still no response - please can I get this fixed? Many thanks

2922: 1847: 1208: 1170: 158: 104: 85: 77: 50: 31: 23: 855:

submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on

967: 923:

The draft also lacks references discussing the subject and is written like an advertisement in parts. References should be from

916: 662: 654: 471: 463: 3402:

here for jhttps://www.reddit.com/r/wikipedia/comments/zcudop/why_are_so_many_wikipedia_admins_bullies/?rdt=62731ust one example

1706:, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with 1962: 1874: 1529: 1429: 1329: 1063: 1020:, a friendly space on Knowledge (XXG) where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 904: 1990: 1902: 1457: 1357: 1175: 796:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 572:

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

381:

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

298:

Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from

3364: 3183: 2791: 2576: 2450: 2382: 2234: 2090: 648: 565: 457: 2006: 1918: 1577: 1473: 1373: 1107: 1087: 801: 682: 642: 491: 451: 320:

The article still contains many external links in the article text which isn't allowed by the policy of Knowledge (XXG).

153: 99: 45: 2432: 139: 131: 3323: 3142: 2750: 2535: 2327: 2193: 2049: 1468: 1445: 1413: 1368: 1345: 1313: 941: 883: 840: 2438: 3317: 3136: 2744: 2529: 2187: 2043: 1969: 1881: 1536: 1436: 1336: 1070: 186: 3489:

requests and not be able to participate extensively in discussion, the chances of you ever being unblocked go down.

1670:

and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

752: 744: 3432: 3322:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

3141:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

2749:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

2534:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

2192:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

2048:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

374: 1699: 2966: 169: 115: 61: 2732:, Can we have a discussion to see how i can get this all back up and running - i am keen to get more involved 792: 709: 2972:

to confirm no recent socking. User agrees to avoid finance and edit about History and Cricket and UK sports.

1913: 1890: 1858: 341:, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the 3110: 3005: 2977: 2930: 1659: 1561: 532: 524: 314:

to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the

3494: 3405: 3328: 3295: 3217: 3147: 3114: 3091: 3071: 3053: 3032: 3015: 2941: 2824: 2755: 2715: 2680: 2540: 2342: 2198: 2054: 1739: 1634:, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from 1605:

Hi Jamesmaharrison, thanks for your new article about Caxton FX and your edits about one of its founders.

1268: 538: 3396:

supporting POWs after WW2. I have been specific about my potential content posts, I have reached out to (

2331: 3427: 3397: 3288: 3278: 3236: 2483: 1195: 764: 613: 422: 1102: 1079: 1047: 1016: 577: 386: 901:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

2001: 1978: 1946: 1631: 1623: 1497: 1484: 1397: 1384: 1293: 1247: 1165: 1135: 1122: 820: 279: 165: 111: 57: 1804: 1800: 606: 415: 315: 2991: 705: 1610:

not have sufficient sources and c) to allow for independent oversight re. the potential conflict.

848: 3001: 2973: 2926: 2020: 1932: 1819: 1762: 1732: 1723: 1674: 1614: 1591: 729: 1796: 1285: 259:

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also,

1552:, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not 1160:

your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things

3490: 2679:

supporter and advocate over the last decade and want to do more as I have some time to do so.

1572: 1545: 1513: 1086:, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a 1014:. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the 342: 303: 3486: 1986: 1898: 1788: 1453: 1353: 1218: 1117: 3456: 3274: 3259: 3232: 3087: 3048: 2957: 2903: 2710: 2700: 2651: 2628: 2505: 2478: 2359: 2305: 2282: 2165: 2122: 760: 690: 499: 350: 322: 3471: 2620: 1812:

achievement, it just means they submitted their paperwork at the right time and correctly).

1667: 1083: 898: 852: 194: 180: 2880: 2142: 1606: 1289: 1243: 915:. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid 816: 275: 264: 1645: 1639: 1635: 928: 924: 797: 1981:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under 1893:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under 1448:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under 1348:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under 1082:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under 675:

Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

484:

Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

337:

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Knowledge (XXG), as you did to

2987: 1026: 978: 865: 856: 346: 307: 2846:

your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

1655: 1651: 1548:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

208: 3070:

HI There - i still seem to be blocked? is there anything i can do to expedite this?

2016: 1928: 1587: 725: 1185:

articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;

997: 2729: 2696: 2664: 2624: 2501: 2278: 2005:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1917:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1576:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1472:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1372:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1106:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

515: 338: 306:. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been 299: 3498: 3437: 3413: 3303: 3282: 3240: 3122: 3099: 3079: 3061: 3040: 3023: 3009: 2995: 2981: 2949: 2940:

I will be contributing to pages relating to History and Cricket and UK sports.

2934: 2884: 2850:

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Knowledge (XXG),

2832: 2723: 2704: 2688: 2632: 2509: 2286: 2146: 2024: 1936: 1822: 1765: 1747: 1726: 1677: 1617: 1595: 1503: 1403: 1297: 1276: 1251: 1141: 1033: 985: 891: 872: 824: 768: 733: 713: 695: 661:

justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See

546: 504: 470:

justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See

355: 327: 283: 173: 119: 65: 2876: 2335: 2138: 2608:

have been adding content on and off to Knowledge (XXG) for the last 12 years

931:(third-party) sources that discuss the subject in significant detail. Thanks, 242:

Smith, John. "", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref: -->

2921:

Please describe what edits you would make unrelated to Fintech or any other

1021: 973: 860: 3401: 345:. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been 591:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

400:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

1961:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

1873:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

1528:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

1428:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

1328:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

1062:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

2408: 1288:

but it is temporarily protected form being re-created in article space.

1152: 835: 2338:

lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

231:

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

1996:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

1908:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

1567:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

1463:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

1363:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

1097:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

71:

Problems with upload of File:Majid Jafar Crescent Petrolium Image.jpg

17:

Problems with upload of File:Majid Jafar Crescent Petrolium Image.pdf

1560:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about 1264:

Am I still able to amend and write this page in the right format?

213: 552:

File permission problem with File:Majid Jafar Chatham House 1.jpg

940:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

149:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

95:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

41:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

1799:. They may be notable, however, this needs to be supported by 968:

Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors

3308: 3127: 2735: 2520: 2318: 2178: 2034: 2011: 1951: 1923: 1863: 1688: 1582: 1518: 1478: 1418: 1378: 1318: 1112: 1052: 890: 779: 555: 364: 185: 2121:

Hello I have been blocked and had my account suspended by @

759:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

619:

to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

428:

to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

1116:, or if you have already done so, you can place a request 125:

Problems with upload of File:Majid Jafar Chatham house.jpg

3444:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

3247:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

2891:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

2639:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

2293:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

2153:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

1704:

Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Jamesmaharrison

3464:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

3267:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2911:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2659:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2313:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2173:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1850:

incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.

1650:

Information that can't be referenced should be removed (

947:

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the

845:

User:Jamesmaharrison/sandbox/Application Risk Management

3378: 3374: 3368: 3359: 3355: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3197: 3193: 3187: 3178: 3174: 3160: 3156: 3152: 2805: 2801: 2795: 2786: 2782: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2590: 2586: 2580: 2571: 2567: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2487: 2456: 2444: 2396: 2392: 2386: 2377: 2373: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2248: 2244: 2238: 2229: 2225: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2137:

This does not address your abuse of multiple accounts.

2104: 2100: 2094: 2085: 2081: 2067: 2063: 2059: 957: 949: 670: 479: 361:

File permission problem with File:Majid Jafar Image.jpg

239:"The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref: --> 1217:

to your organization's website in other articles (see

811:

will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

665:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

474:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

200:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Majid Jafar

1833:

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

944:

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

3316: