101:, however a review of your edithistory shows that antipathy for Lawless overwhelms your ability to edit neutrally on the subject, to the point where you have created an additional account to support your stance. As such, I have blocked you indefinitely. You can appeal the block, but I would not support an unblock without a topic ban on editing the Lawless article or its talk page.--
23:
59:
66:
36:
31:
52:
45:
41:
72:
97:
I initially considered blocking you for 2 weeks as you have edited some topics outside of
98:
102:
82:
22:
110:
90:
65:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
69:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
21:
58:, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
8:
7:
44:. Note that multiple accounts are
14:
1:
127:
60:may be reverted or deleted
67:guide to appealing blocks
42:abusing multiple accounts
111:18:09, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
91:18:09, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
26:
77:Your reason here ~~~~
25:
27:
40:from editing for
17:Multiple accounts
118:
108:
88:
80:
126:
125:
121:
120:
119:
117:
116:
115:
103:
94:
93:
83:
70:
63:
19:
12:
11:
5:
124:
122:
114:
113:
64:
29:You have been
28:
20:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
123:
112:
109:
107:
100:
96:
95:
92:
89:
87:
78:
74:
68:
61:
57:
55:
54:
47:
43:
39:
38:
34:
33:
24:
16:
105:
99:Seph Lawless
85:
76:
53:illegitimate
51:
49:
37:indefinitely
35:
30:
104:Jezebel's
84:Jezebel's
75:|reason=
50:not for
73:unblock
56:reasons
46:allowed
32:blocked
48:, but
106:Ponyo
86:Ponyo
62:.
81:.
79:}}
71:{{
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
