User talk:Jacoplane/archive4

956:

I tend to see things through and I have to admit that it all sparked a little passion… forcing me to be far more subjective than I intended. It's just that everyone involved seems to say same thing, and most people agree that all SF games are playable, so I really wonder why this cannot be stated in main article (actually I do understand why this information is constantly hushed up, and I simply felt a need to post a few shouts, perhaps someone who has a really good reason for playing illegal games will here the words and have nicer life;). I guess that all this has something to do with my tendency to see these things in somewhat metaphysical levels, if you know what I mean. For a while I even thought about translating article about SF that I wrote for PCPlay magazine, and ask my editor for permission to post it on Wiki, but no time for such action, and I don’t think that I could translate everything in a manner that would satisfy me as an author. Anyway, just dropped by to thank you, and tell you that I'll try to stay involved. I've already quick scanned interesting link you provided (thank you for invitation), but, sadly, at the moment I have to freeze my Wiki activities. Guess will meet again in a few days, first I have to meet my deadlines;). BTW, I work for # of IT magazines and games are just a part of my interest, few months ago I wrote huge article about online encyclopedias, with special care for all Wiki projects, so in a way, I'm already heavily involved in Knowledge (XXG), or at least in the promotion of its lovely idea. Salute, --

604:

page seem have been resolved - except a discussion between User:Seraphim and User:Daniel.Cardenas heading "Being Stooges for Sony Marketing Department" which seems to be getting a little heated. Maybe a new page would help both of these users to cool off and consider the value of their discussion, or maybe not. Quote from this discussion:"i think you need to look inside at yourself and re-evaluate if you should be editing future-release articles" - if that was me I'd consider it insulting - I'm sure its all harmless fun but..

31: 1104: 1906:

wife (a fact that is nowhere on wikipedia and is not public) and then made derogatory harassment-oriented sockpuppets with her name in the title should be enough. I lost over an hours worth of work because this individual discovered my instant messenger account and "bombed" it while I was doing some VB work, crashing my PC.

1926:

Further revelations have been forthcoming- even as I was compiling the list of B4L IPs for the Rick Browser checkuser, he placed a personal attack on the "Request for Admin" page of user Jedi6, someone whom with the Rick Browser username has had NO prior contact with- in fact, the only person who has

1836:

Well, I have not followed this dispute, and there seemed to be simply a template on his userpage without any evidence presented as I mentioned on the talk page. I think that if people make accusations there needs to be evidence to back up their claims, and simply saying "look at his contributions" is

1370:

Thanks for the message. My rationale was that since he insistently reverted to his favoured version that contained glaring grammatical and spelling mistakes, he is not editing the article to improve it, but trying to disrupt it instead. At the very least, he is just reverting any-how anything that he

955:

Hola, Jackoplane & thank you for such kind reply, unfortunately, I'm also rather busy, currently I'm in the middle of Mark Ecko's Getting UP review (nice game, check it out if you will, it is quite artsy), and this StarForce issue is just in the way, should have already been behind me by now, but

1897:

Obviously that evidence stands out, but Rick's edits (which mostly center around Brazil topics), his style of speech, his first interjections into the ESRB topic (which was for him to put a grevious insult against me), the fact that he's been watching my user contributions just like Brazil4Linux has

1714:

You know I completely understand why you made that statement... Edits by both Raphael1 and Irishpunktom tend to suffer greatly from logical inconsistencies and in many cases are tantamount to obfuscation to merely tire those out who do try to attain true NPOV in a given article. I'm glad to see that

603:

Hello. Can you help - the Playstaion 3 talk page is getting very long but I can't find out how to archive it. Maybe you could and perhaps leave a link for me so that I can do it in the future if I need to. (The page is now much longer than any of the previous archives) Also most of the topics on the

1676:

It's a bit of a grey area. When the only subject of the image is the box, as in the image you linked to, it would be considered a derivative work, and therefore covered by the original copyright. Whereas a photo of a large shelf-full of video games would probably be okay, as the framing of the shot

1651:

And this is my fault how? The edit he was inserting in the Wikiproject clearly went against the Fair use policy. He was the one not being civil (are you saying I harassed him please show me where I did so) and he started revert warring. It's not at all a matter of group think, I just don't buy that

1640:

Check out doom127's userpage. He just sent me an email saying that the harassment he suffered on Knowledge (XXG) has annoyed him to the extent of abandoning his account. I was trying to get you guys to agree on this, and no, there WASN'T a consensus, despite what you and a few others are now doing.

1592:

Ow. Just ow. I know that may be the new ref style or whatever, but it's horrid. First of all I don't like it because it places all the referencing text in the article space, making it an absolute mess to read in the edit window. Second it took 43 nicely alphabetized references and expanded them out

461:

Hello. Please note that all images should have detailed source information. In is insufficient to tag them as promotional without a specific (i.e. URL) source. Images without this information will be deleted. If you reinstate the images you mention, could you also update the image description pages

1865:

Hi Jacoplane Thanks very much for the welcome! I'm a longtime Knowledge (XXG) user and sometime contributor, but not since the registration requirement was introduced. I replaced the LBA 3 article for two reasons: articles on forthcoming computer games are commonplace, as long as the disclaimer is

1631:

Dear friend, it seems that 66.210.134.5 has wrote nonsense again. This time, he (or she or it) has wrote some rubbish in the section "Trivia" about Bono (from U2) I am only a newbie, can you revert to last good version of the article? is it posible to block the changes of this person? last time he

489:

status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Knowledge (XXG) (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases

1905:

Listen, Jacoplane, I understand that you are attempting to be fair in this dispute. However, this user has been doing this (create sockpuppet, attack, disappear) for the better part of half a year now, and I quite frankly am sick of it. The fact that he was able to somehow discover the name of my

1204:

Thank you for your recent vote on my RFA. While the nomination failed, I was rather expecting it due to the big lapse between registration and recent edits. I appreciate the comments you left when you voted, and I will definitely keep them in mind. If you have any other suggestions as to how I

1186:! I look forward to using these tools to enhance and maintain this wonderful site. I will continue regular article/project contributions, but I will also allocate a sizable portion of my wikischedule toward administrative duties :) Thanks again, and if you have any questions/comments/tips, please 1221:

Thanks alot for personally vouching for me in my RFA, I am very pessimistic about it passing, although one never knows about these things. It meant alot the things that you say since frankly I really dont get any wikipreciation, besides I guess from my own personal enjoyment of doing it and the

684:(WCN) houden, volgend op Wikimania in Boston, gedeeltelijk erop inspelend middels een aantal discussiegroepen. Om iets dergelijks te organiseren is imput erg gewenst. Dus als je wilt meehelpen, of als je interesse hebt om bij een dergelijk evenement aanwezig te zijn, geef dat dan aan op 544:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 1375:. The vast amount of new accounts with only edit on that page is worrying, and is it really a coincidence that all of them are reverting to his favoured version? Not to mention a string of vandalism that my user and talk page received during that time. -- 1593:

to 63 unalphabetized references, many of them duplicated (as some sources are cited multiple times). I'm sorry to revert you on that, but I really think it was much nicer the way it was, and I'd ask you to not do that again on that article. Thanks.

807:

and have encouraged others to continue with February. This is consistent with what has been done in previous years. I also moved the month pages to a new name, consistent with the year ones; I hope I haven't broken any templates by doing that...

1243:

Hello, you recently removed an image from a current article. Please explain in more details why you believe fair use does not apply. I have re-read the fair-use articles and here is what is what i believe qualifies the picture for fair use.

635:

Thanks for your support on my recent request for adminship. It passed at 91/1/0, and I hope I can continue to deserve the community's trust. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help you, and if I make a mistake be sure to tell me.

1725::) Yeah well we'll see how long I'll last. I really hope I can keep a cool head and help people reach some sort of consensus. Although this article is tiring, I don't really have much time left to do things on WP I actually enjoy doing.. 1390:

I think it's beyond reasonable to assume that all the follow-up first-time and near first-time editors, as well as two new accounts which vandalised my user page, and four new accounts that vandalised my talk page are all sockpuppets of

1768:

on your new books list. I am currently studying about lonelyness and how Steinbeck reveals to us clues about what is going to happen next. Have an exam in school soon to do on it. Are you studying it or just reading it for pleasure?

768:

Thanks for nominating. Never knew about that, but I voted. How is it supposed to work? If enough people vote for it, do they collaborate to research and improve the article? I see that a minimum of 3 votes a week is necessary.

187: 360:

Jacoplane if you are an administrator, will you aid me in starting a team of fellow Wikipedians? Please sent me some information on being an administrator (because I believe I would be perfect for the job)!,

1930:

He's disrupting what should be a very serious and solemn vote on Knowledge (XXG), and I'm requesting your help in resolving it... What is normally done when someone leaps into an RFA with personal attacks?

1749:

I noticed you added a few details about StarCraft 64 to the StarCraft page. Have you played the game? If it has any extra missions, could you make a note of them there? (No need to go into detail, though.)

1901:

Once the Checkuser comes back and shows that Rick does indeed hail from Brazil, I have no doubt that he will once again vanish and wait another few weeks, then create yet ANOTHER sockpuppet to attack me.

397:

and therefore I have been installed as an administrator now, and I'm ready to serve Wikipedians all over the world with my newly acquired mop and bucket. If you have any questions, do not hestitate to

108:

No problem, you've done a lot of great work. It's funny, I was just thinking that we need a CVG barnstar. We've already got the controller image, we just need someone to smack it in front of a star. --

1568:

Sorry it as to be done! It's called owning! They know they are doing the wrong thing, because they want to vandal. So I notice, and if they think they are a smart @ss...they get a lil piece of me:P

1827:

Actually, you were revealed as a sockpuppet via your actions and your words. I've watched the entire dispute, and what was put on your page (a sockpuppet notice) is entirely appropriate, Rick.

324:

I know which edit. But I thought I would put it as a subsection under club career section where the table would be relevent. If you see the edit history, you would see thats where I put it.

540:

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1547:

Message received, is there any way to bring more editors to bear on this article to ensure a proper sum total NPOV since this article appears to be in such a precarious state relative to

1148:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any 232:

Jacoplane- If that was TheRingess you just tried to unblock again, it showed up in #wikipedia-en-vandalism as ] for some reason, that may have something to do with all this. --

1144:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

101:

Thank you so much for the barnstar! Maybe we should create a CVG barnstar, there are a lot of people who really deserve one. Cheers! Jacoplane 05:49, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

1882:

to a page on the Knowledge (XXG). And after all, it's an encyclopedia - and someone may wish to get information on a possible sequel to LBA 2. Hope I've convinced you! T.

1395:. If he pulls something like that off again, I'm going to block him. Even his malicious use of sockpuppets alone should get him a day or two. Tell me if you object. -- 1137:, meaning that is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. 848:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 88: 66: 390: 994:

recently as well as marking images for speedy deletion, so I feel like I'm taking on more of a janitorial role. Any advice before I'm subjected to the gauntlet?

1175: 778: 1614:

went into inactivity. The article has undergone some changes since the last comment. Please review the article in its current state. Thanks. Have a nice day.

708: 347:

I've vaguely heard of it. I don't think theres really much there to keep especially since it sounds like it isn't complete. I don't know. Rather merge with

626: 845: 571: 1641:

He was a good user, with a lot of good edits on Knowledge (XXG). Sigh... I guess what they say is true- Knowledge (XXG) IS a foundation of groupthink.

1957:

Thank you Jacoplane. Chances are that he'll just create another sock sometime in the future, but for the moment... there is peace. -bows- Good night.

1153: 545: 1145: 541: 1055: 84: 70: 1358:

I wouldn't consider reverting edits that change "focused" to "focussed" (ie. spelling errors) and introduce grammatical mistakes an edit war. --

158:

Im thinking about applying for adminship, do you think its a good idea? Or should i hold off for now till i build up my street cred some more. --

38: 54: 256: 207: 1372: 946:

Sadly, my first involvement in Knowledge (XXG) has resulted with dispute and I'm afraid that StarForce needs more of your attention…

781:

request for adminship. I'll try to put the admin tools to good and responsible use. If I do anything wrong you know where to find me.

1890:

I've written up a detailed summary regarding Brazil4Linux, Rick Browser, his actions and the ESRB dispute in an attempt to ascertain

1248:

the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;

524: 520: 404: 588: 1715:

you are back on it but I fear that you too may eventually tire out battling such illogical (and often times heavily POV) edits.

435:. It's a petition for getting the original voice actors back for the Sonic games (instead of the Sonic X voice actors). --anon 823: 711:, of course if you ever need a hand, let me know :) Also, I think your sig is the nicest looking one I have seen around :) - 493:

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use

42:

of inactive discussion. Please do not edit it. If you wish to revitalize an old topic, bring it up on the active talk page.

1870:) and also LBA 3 isn't original work - comments from Frédérick Raynal are available (original), as are sketches (original) 1042: 514: 1453:

Ya, I think the person meant to put it on the AfD page. I've never seen someone get so excited about math though ;-) --

1272:

The only copyright on page is for the forum sofware at the bottom, so the posts themselves may not even be copyrighted.

841: 1183: 219: 1867: 673:. Dit wordt de Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland (VWN). Je kunt je interesse om lid te worden van deze vereniging 1342:

Thanks for the info; I hope we somehow manage to turn him around. Hey, crazier things have happened on wiki...

574:. The admin tools will definitely be useful for dealing with vandalism more swiftly. Please drop a note on my 301: 215: 1059: 732: 693: 380: 289: 239: 1927:

ever to my knowledge bore a grudge against Jedi6 was in fact Brazil4Linux. You can take a look at it .

1125: 1092: 531: 481: 473: 508: 275: 527:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as

389:

Hi Jacoplane/archive4. On behalf of my right eye, I'd like to thank you for giving me your support on

334: 325: 316: 1392: 1352: 1019: 1001: 925: 804: 584: 579: 575: 118: 1878:. Sure, it ain't Pulitzer material, but I think that LBA 3 has every bit as much of a right as, eg, 1787:

I just read it again recently, and it is one of my favorite books, so that would be for pleasure :)

1282:

the amount and substantially of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and

957: 950: 1844: 1794: 1732: 1659: 1227: 1223: 1205:

could improve as a Wikipedian, so as to hopefully succeed next time, please let me know! Thanks! —

1187: 974: 827: 689: 656: 448: 413: 398: 159: 127: 17: 1511: 1497: 986:

Wow, it sounds cheesy but I'm honored. Yes, I am interested; I've started becoming more active in

30: 1772: 1474: 901: 876: 854: 718: 556: 297: 1510:

The screenshot from "The Dig." I already figured out the video filters, though. Thanks anyway! -

1894:

whether or not he is a sockpuppet of Brazil4Linux, and put it on the CheckUser Request page .

1574: 1816: 507:. If you believe the image qualifies under Knowledge (XXG)'s fair use guidelines, please read 244: 214:. However, for future reference, you are right. I will place it for review first. Thank you. — 173: 1226:). But I should have just done more in policy, like you had said. Oh well :/ Thanks anyway -- 1138: 211: 1777: 1683: 1645: 1594: 1480: 1428:

discussion in the same talk page. In particluar, I want to draw admin attention to the user

907: 882: 860: 1548: 1521: 991: 987: 669:

Beste allemaal Al enige tijd is er een Nederlandstalig chapter in oprichting, te vinden op

1611: 1014: 996: 920: 637: 366: 138: 109: 92: 74: 58: 1935: 1130: 1103: 872:

I was going to upload a new version your image but someone used a different filename. --

53: 1839: 1789: 1751: 1727: 1654: 1618: 1437: 1343: 1324: 1191: 1076: 969: 782: 736: 552: 490:

link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

444: 432: 408: 352: 200: 122: 1134: 255: 1716: 1698: 1586: 1552: 1536: 1470:

I have added you as a friend on digg so I can see what you been diggin' lately. :) --

1299:

the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

1207: 756: 712: 497: 348: 186:

I've managed to implement most of the (useful) suggestions from the peer review into

1129:. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a 1961: 1958: 1949: 1946: 1932: 1913: 1910: 1850: 1831: 1828: 1819: 1812: 1800: 1781: 1754: 1738: 1719: 1708: 1701: 1687: 1665: 1642: 1621: 1597: 1578: 1555: 1539: 1525: 1514: 1500: 1486: 1457: 1454: 1440: 1401: 1381: 1364: 1346: 1331: 1317: 1230: 1211: 1194: 1164: 1157: 1082: 1025: 1007: 980: 931: 913: 888: 866: 830: 812: 809: 785: 758: 739: 721: 697: 659: 645: 620: 617: 611: 608: 593: 560: 466: 463: 451: 421: 369: 355: 337: 328: 319: 305: 278: 263: 250: 234: 222: 194: 191: 176: 162: 141: 132: 112: 95: 77: 190:. If you were still keen on featured list status, I certainly wouldn't object :) 1679: 1328: 1314: 745: 731:

Since you have taken an interest in links. Please be kind enough to vote for my

616:

Somebody helped me do the above, Thanks anyway, you can now ignore this message.

260: 655:

Hey can you vote for my GCOTW collab? Michael Jackson's Moonwalker? Thanks!! --

641: 87:. This barnstar is in recognition of that, as well as your efforts to improve 1535:.... I'm thinking of submitting it for AfD for that reason alone. Thoughts? 1371:

doesn't like. I have requested for CheckUser but there is a huge backlog on

1237: 1071: 1052: 735:

to reduce overlinking of dates where they are not part of date preferences.

685: 681: 486: 1875: 1603: 1433: 1410: 607:

Anyway - how do I archive talk pages? (are there wiki guidlines?) Thank you

403: 1306:

in any case, the forum contents cannot be sold/marketed so there is none.

752: 485:. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the 688:. Ik hoop daar snel je imput tegemoet te zien! Met vriendelijke groet, 1420:

section in the article and put up a detailed rationale for it in the

1174:

Hey Jacoplane/archive4, how is it going? Thank you for supporting my

379: 1496:

How did you get ScummVM to output such a smooth-looking screenshot?

1421: 188:

Table of political parties in Europe by pancontinental organisation

1531:

Your "Islamophobia definition" link really does give me cause for

1048: 254: 52: 1432:, going through the discussions in the talk page of the article 1424:. Please review the edit and please comment on it. Also see the 504: 1041: 351:(see bottom of section: Sequels) where it's already mentioned. 751:

Thanks for the link. I'll check it out when I get a chance.

1222:

optimism in collaborations shown by some users (particularly

918:

In the future, just speedy it as an orphaned fair use image.

893:

Thanks, you can create one for your user page if you like at

1255:

It is a valid point to display an image to cite a criticism.

633:

With apologies for the impersonal AWB-ness of the message...

1289:

refer to previous, and the screenshot is 2 posts out of 76.

578:

page, should you have questions about any of my actions. --

967:

Would you be at all interested if I were to nominate you?

894: 91:

in general. Congratulations, and keep up the good work! --

274:

Thanks, That "user" was weird. And thanks for the revert.

431:

Hi, I was just wondering if you would like to sign this

1909:

The truth always comes out in the end, sir. Sincerely,

836:

Image:Newsupermario dsboxboxart.jpg listed for deletion

680:

Deze vereniging gaat eind augustus/begin september een

674: 172:

Thanks for the sweet barnstar! It was a nice surprise.

555:. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: 315:

Can yopu please explain how what I did was nonsense?

1632:(or she or it) spoils the article was yesterday!!! 1652:accusation. I was fine with your latest revision. 1323:Hello again, I have placed this discussion in the 1152:will be deleted after seven days, as described on 779:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Raven4x4x 210:for quite some time following the nomination at 707:I just wanted to say thank you for voting for 846:Knowledge (XXG):Images and media for deletion 570:Thank you for supporting me in my successful 521:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags#Fair_use 8: 822:Please vote for my gcotw candidate which is 803:Hi, I have copied the archive of January to 670: 840:An image or media file that you uploaded, 25: 1876:http://el-muerte.student.utwente.nl/lba/ 1141:if you think that that will be useful. 1677:would be a significant original input. 1327:for the article, please discuss there. 1182:, which means that I have been granted 777:Thank you for supporting my successful 401:. Once again, thanks for your support. 85:Current computer and video games events 1373:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for CheckUser 35: 1919:Intervention requested in Jedi6's RFA 7: 525:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags 1874:(secondary) from fansites, such as 1610:Hi, Its been a long time since the 1265:the nature of the copyrighted work; 842:Image:Newsupermario dsboxboxart.jpg 519:or one of the other tags listed at 1133:. However, the image is currently 682:Wikimedia Conferentie in Nederland 24: 1178:! It passed with a final vote of 393:. It ended with a final tally of 65:for your dedication to improving 1627:Nonsense in page about Bono (U2) 1217:thanks for your personal voucher 1102: 1040: 1036: 462:with an accurate source. Thanks 443:The removal was a mistake. :( — 402: 333:Ok. Will use edit summary then. 259:for removal of the Squid vandal 83:You've put a lot of effort into 29: 1098: 824:Computer and video game culture 551:This is an automated notice by 1: 1811:Can you protect my userpage? 1570:It's the way my game works:P 1069:Here's a userbox for you. -- 786:07:22, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 759:00:02, 27 February 2006 (UTC) 740:23:36, 26 February 2006 (UTC) 722:23:00, 25 February 2006 (UTC) 698:15:38, 25 February 2006 (UTC) 660:17:53, 23 February 2006 (UTC) 646:02:26, 24 February 2006 (UTC) 621:16:42, 24 February 2006 (UTC) 612:20:04, 23 February 2006 (UTC) 594:01:16, 23 February 2006 (UTC) 561:17:26, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 511:, and then use a tag such as 467:12:39, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 452:08:43, 19 February 2006 (UTC) 422:20:57, 18 February 2006 (UTC) 370:13:16, 17 February 2006 (UTC) 356:06:39, 17 February 2006 (UTC) 338:13:41, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 329:13:35, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 320:13:30, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 306:11:28, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 279:09:58, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 264:07:02, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 251:04:35, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 223:02:04, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 195:05:51, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 177:01:59, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 163:22:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC) 142:07:03, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 133:06:13, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 113:05:54, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 96:05:34, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 78:05:34, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 1436:should make it clear why. -- 1154:criteria for speedy deletion 1012:Do you plan to nominate me? 546:criteria for speedy deletion 28: 1416:I made some changes to the 1051:that thanks for supporting 799:Video gaming current events 651:Can you vote for my collab? 457:Re: Orphanbot image removal 399:forward them to my talkpage 1980: 1872:and reports and commentary 1755:20:05, 31 March 2006 (UTC) 1739:18:53, 31 March 2006 (UTC) 1720:18:49, 31 March 2006 (UTC) 1702:13:16, 31 March 2006 (UTC) 1688:12:03, 31 March 2006 (UTC) 1666:02:31, 31 March 2006 (UTC) 1646:02:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC) 1622:08:27, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 1598:04:21, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 1579:03:21, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 1556:02:19, 28 March 2006 (UTC) 1540:01:48, 28 March 2006 (UTC) 1515:01:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC) 1501:10:11, 25 March 2006 (UTC) 1487:13:13, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 1458:02:17, 16 March 2006 (UTC) 1441:18:36, 15 March 2006 (UTC) 1402:00:04, 16 March 2006 (UTC) 1382:23:44, 15 March 2006 (UTC) 1365:06:13, 15 March 2006 (UTC) 1347:03:51, 15 March 2006 (UTC) 1332:18:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC) 1318:18:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC) 1231:18:21, 13 March 2006 (UTC) 1212:07:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC) 1195:04:51, 10 March 2006 (UTC) 1026:00:47, 13 March 2006 (UTC) 1962:07:57, 3 April 2006 (UTC) 1950:07:35, 3 April 2006 (UTC) 1936:06:45, 3 April 2006 (UTC) 1914:06:03, 3 April 2006 (UTC) 1851:03:56, 3 April 2006 (UTC) 1837:not evidence in my mind. 1832:22:27, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 1820:19:44, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 1801:10:48, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 1782:10:41, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 1636:Well, I hope you're happy 1492:ScummVM Smooth Screenshot 1165:21:51, 9 March 2006 (UTC) 1091:Orphaned fair use image ( 1083:04:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC) 1008:03:45, 9 March 2006 (UTC) 981:02:46, 9 March 2006 (UTC) 932:22:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC) 914:19:01, 8 March 2006 (UTC) 889:23:35, 7 March 2006 (UTC) 867:20:19, 7 March 2006 (UTC) 831:19:21, 7 March 2006 (UTC) 813:16:46, 3 March 2006 (UTC) 182:Table of European parties 1898:done all stand to mind. 1868:Half-Life 2: Episode One 1764:Saw on Reader2 you have 818:Please vote for my GCOTW 503:to release it under the 1047:This user thinks it is 895:http://www.cooltext.com 671:http://nl.wikimedia.org 439:Mohammed cartoons image 208:featured article review 63:Current Events Barnstar 49:Current Events Barnstar 1815:are vandalizing it. -- 1693:oh how not sorry im am 1635: 1236:Removal of image from 1058:came in the form of a 387: 266: 80: 1697:the name says it all 1176:Request for adminship 1123:Thanks for uploading 844:, has been listed at 479:Thanks for uploading 385: 258: 119:Image:BarnstarCVG.png 56: 1393:User:Robust Physique 1353:User:Robust Physique 805:2006 in video gaming 515:Non-free fair use in 206:I hadn't discovered 1918: 1426:Alizee career over? 1238:StarForce#Criticism 1139:You may add it back 1126:Image:Cvgportal.jpg 1093:Image:Cvgportal.jpg 733:new bot application 482:Image:Nn_romney.jpg 474:Image:Nn_romney.jpg 290:User:195.85.154.162 18:User talk:Jacoplane 1111:This media may be 472:Image Tagging for 388: 267: 137:Not bad at all! -- 81: 71:current CVG events 1941:Checkuser results 1483: 1121: 1120: 1066: 1065: 910: 885: 863: 795:sorry about that 764:Chinese mythology 640:is always open. ( 634: 591: 343:GoldenEye Doom TC 46: 45: 1971: 1923:Hi Jacoplane... 1886:Regarding "Rick" 1847: 1842: 1797: 1792: 1780: 1735: 1730: 1686: 1662: 1657: 1485: 1484: 1479: 1430:Frits van Houten 1400: 1380: 1363: 1162: 1146:my contributions 1131:fair use license 1116: 1106: 1099: 1081: 1079: 1074: 1044: 1037: 1022: 1017: 1004: 999: 977: 972: 928: 923: 912: 911: 906: 887: 886: 881: 865: 864: 859: 717: 632: 583: 542:my contributions 536: 530: 518: 502: 496: 418: 411: 406: 383: 242: 130: 125: 117:How about this: 61:, award you the 33: 26: 1979: 1978: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1943: 1921: 1888: 1863: 1845: 1840: 1809: 1795: 1790: 1770: 1766:Of Mice and Men 1762: 1760:Of Mice and Men 1747: 1733: 1728: 1712: 1707:"Giving up" on 1695: 1678: 1674: 1672:Photos of boxes 1660: 1655: 1638: 1629: 1608: 1590: 1566: 1529: 1508: 1494: 1472: 1471: 1468: 1448: 1414: 1396: 1376: 1359: 1356: 1340: 1241: 1219: 1202: 1172: 1158: 1117: 1110: 1097: 1077: 1072: 1070: 1067: 1034: 1020: 1015: 1002: 997: 975: 970: 965: 944: 926: 921: 899: 898: 874: 873: 852: 851: 849: 838: 820: 801: 793: 775: 766: 749: 729: 715: 705: 667: 653: 630: 601: 568: 534: 528: 517:|article name}} 512: 500: 494: 477: 459: 441: 429: 424: 414: 409: 381: 377: 345: 313: 311:Owen Hargreaves 286: 272: 240: 230: 216:Eternal Equinox 204: 184: 170: 156: 128: 123: 89:WikiProject CVG 67:Wikiproject CVG 51: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1977: 1975: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1942: 1939: 1920: 1917: 1887: 1884: 1862: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1808: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1761: 1758: 1746: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1711: 1705: 1699:the southerner 1694: 1691: 1673: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1637: 1634: 1628: 1625: 1607: 1601: 1589: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1569: 1565: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1528: 1518: 1507: 1504: 1493: 1490: 1467: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1447: 1444: 1413: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1385: 1384: 1355: 1350: 1339: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1312: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1301: 1300: 1295: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1284: 1283: 1278: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1267: 1266: 1261: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1250: 1249: 1240: 1234: 1218: 1215: 1201: 1198: 1171: 1168: 1119: 1118: 1109: 1107: 1096: 1089: 1087: 1064: 1063: 1056:successful RFA 1045: 1035: 1033: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1010: 964: 961: 943: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 839: 837: 834: 819: 816: 800: 797: 792: 789: 774: 771: 765: 762: 748: 743: 728: 725: 704: 701: 666: 663: 652: 649: 629: 624: 600: 597: 567: 564: 476: 470: 458: 455: 440: 437: 428: 425: 378: 376: 373: 344: 341: 312: 309: 292:... they were 285: 282: 271: 270:66.109.196.176 268: 229: 226: 203: 201:Super Mario 64 198: 183: 180: 169: 166: 155: 152: 151: 150: 149: 148: 147: 146: 145: 144: 103: 102: 50: 47: 44: 43: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1976: 1963: 1960: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1948: 1940: 1938: 1937: 1934: 1928: 1924: 1916: 1915: 1912: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1893: 1885: 1883: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1860: 1852: 1849: 1848: 1843: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1830: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1818: 1814: 1806: 1802: 1799: 1798: 1793: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1774: 1767: 1759: 1757: 1756: 1753: 1744: 1740: 1737: 1736: 1731: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1718: 1710: 1706: 1704: 1703: 1700: 1692: 1690: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1671: 1667: 1664: 1663: 1658: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1644: 1633: 1626: 1624: 1623: 1620: 1615: 1613: 1605: 1602: 1600: 1599: 1596: 1588: 1587:J. K. Rowling 1584: 1580: 1577: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1563: 1557: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1538: 1534: 1533:great concern 1527: 1523: 1519: 1517: 1516: 1513: 1505: 1503: 1502: 1499: 1491: 1489: 1488: 1482: 1477: 1476: 1465: 1459: 1456: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1445: 1443: 1442: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1412: 1409: 1403: 1399: 1394: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1383: 1379: 1374: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1362: 1354: 1351: 1349: 1348: 1345: 1337: 1333: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1316: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1239: 1235: 1233: 1232: 1229: 1225: 1224:User:Vic_Vipr 1216: 1214: 1213: 1210: 1209: 1199: 1197: 1196: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1169: 1167: 1166: 1163: 1161: 1156:. Thank you. 1155: 1151: 1147: 1142: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1127: 1114: 1108: 1105: 1101: 1100: 1094: 1090: 1088: 1085: 1084: 1080: 1075: 1061: 1057: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1043: 1039: 1038: 1031: 1027: 1024: 1023: 1018: 1011: 1009: 1006: 1005: 1000: 993: 989: 985: 984: 983: 982: 979: 978: 973: 962: 960: 959: 953: 952: 947: 941: 933: 930: 929: 924: 917: 916: 915: 909: 904: 903: 896: 892: 891: 890: 884: 879: 878: 871: 870: 869: 868: 862: 857: 856: 847: 843: 835: 833: 832: 829: 825: 817: 815: 814: 811: 806: 798: 796: 790: 788: 787: 784: 780: 772: 770: 763: 761: 760: 757: 754: 747: 744: 742: 741: 738: 734: 726: 724: 723: 720: 714: 710: 702: 700: 699: 696: 695: 691: 687: 683: 678: 676: 672: 664: 662: 661: 658: 650: 648: 647: 643: 639: 628: 625: 623: 622: 619: 614: 613: 610: 605: 599:Page too long 598: 596: 595: 590: 586: 581: 577: 573: 565: 563: 562: 558: 554: 549: 547: 543: 538: 533: 526: 522: 516: 510: 506: 499: 491: 488: 484: 483: 475: 471: 469: 468: 465: 456: 454: 453: 450: 446: 438: 436: 434: 426: 423: 420: 419: 417: 412: 405: 400: 396: 392: 391:my recent RfA 384: 374: 372: 371: 368: 364: 358: 357: 354: 350: 349:GoldenEye 007 342: 340: 339: 336: 331: 330: 327: 322: 321: 318: 310: 308: 307: 303: 299: 298:Adrian~enwiki 295: 291: 288:For blocking 283: 281: 280: 277: 269: 265: 262: 257: 253: 252: 249: 248: 247: 243: 238: 237: 227: 225: 224: 221: 217: 213: 209: 202: 199: 197: 196: 193: 189: 181: 179: 178: 175: 167: 165: 164: 161: 153: 143: 140: 136: 135: 134: 131: 126: 120: 116: 115: 114: 111: 107: 106: 105: 104: 100: 99: 98: 97: 94: 90: 86: 79: 76: 72: 68: 64: 60: 55: 48: 41: 40: 32: 27: 19: 1959:Daniel Davis 1947:Daniel Davis 1944: 1933:Daniel Davis 1929: 1925: 1922: 1911:Daniel Davis 1908: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1891: 1889: 1879: 1871: 1864: 1838: 1817:Rick Browser 1813:User:Doom127 1810: 1788: 1771: 1765: 1763: 1748: 1726: 1713: 1709:Islamophobia 1696: 1675: 1653: 1639: 1630: 1616: 1609: 1591: 1567: 1564:Edit summary 1532: 1530: 1526:Islamophobia 1524:concerns on 1509: 1495: 1473: 1469: 1446:My talk page 1429: 1425: 1417: 1415: 1397: 1377: 1360: 1357: 1341: 1311: 1294: 1277: 1260: 1242: 1220: 1206: 1203: 1179: 1173: 1159: 1149: 1143: 1124: 1122: 1112: 1086: 1068: 1013: 995: 968: 966: 954: 948: 945: 919: 900: 875: 853: 850: 821: 802: 794: 776: 767: 750: 730: 706: 692: 686:nl.wikimedia 679: 668: 654: 638:My talk page 631: 615: 606: 602: 569: 550: 539: 532:db-unksource 492: 480: 478: 460: 442: 430: 415: 407: 394: 362: 359: 346: 332: 323: 314: 293: 287: 276:Mikereichold 273: 245: 235: 233: 231: 205: 185: 174:Thunderbrand 171: 157: 82: 62: 37: 1612:peer review 1595:Ëvilphoenix 1398:Миборовский 1378:Миборовский 1361:Миборовский 1188:let me know 746:Product Red 677:aangeven. 335:198.96.86.4 326:198.96.86.4 317:198.96.86.4 284:hey, thanks 73:article. -- 36:This is an 1945:It's him. 1866:included ( 949:Salute, -- 826:Thanks! -- 727:Date links 665:VWN en WCN 386:Thank you! 382:Thank you! 367:Metallifan 228:TheRingess 139:Pagrashtak 110:Pagrashtak 93:Pagrashtak 75:Pagrashtak 59:Pagrashtak 1752:Kimera757 1619:Soumyasch 1438:Soumyasch 1422:talk page 1344:Deckiller 1325:talk page 1313:Thankyou 1192:Deckiller 1184:adminship 963:Adminship 958:Lovelight 951:Lovelight 942:StarForce 783:Raven4x4x 737:bobblewik 553:OrphanBot 487:copyright 445:Kimchi.sg 353:K1Bond007 154:Adminship 1892:directly 1717:Netscott 1585:Refs on 1576:x<ino 1553:Netscott 1537:Netscott 1228:Larsinio 1208:akghetto 1150:articles 1135:orphaned 828:Larsinio 753:User:Zoe 713:cohesion 690:effeiets 657:Larsinio 589:contribs 557:Carnildo 509:fair use 433:petition 427:Petition 410:Soothing 395:(73/2/2) 168:Barnstat 160:Larsinio 69:and the 1880:HL2:Ep1 1829:The Eye 1807:Protect 1643:The Eye 1606:article 1512:NeoThe1 1506:ScummVM 1498:NeoThe1 1455:pm_shef 1113:deleted 1060:userbox 810:Azertus 703:Thanks! 618:HappyVR 609:HappyVR 523:. See 464:The JPS 363:A.S.A.P 212:WP:FARC 192:The Tom 39:archive 1773:Thorpe 1680:ed g2s 1604:Alizée 1549:WP:NOR 1522:WP:NOR 1520:Major 1475:Thorpe 1434:Alizée 1418:Future 1411:Alizée 1329:Fosnez 1315:Fosnez 1200:My RFA 1180:73/1/1 1170:My RfA 1053:Cyde's 1049:ironic 1032:Thanks 992:WP:TFD 988:WP:AFD 902:Thorpe 877:Thorpe 855:Thorpe 773:My RFA 709:my RFA 694:anders 627:My RfA 566:My RFA 375:My RfA 261:Tawker 1846:plane 1796:plane 1745:SC 64 1734:plane 1661:plane 1575:: --> 1160:Shyam 1021:shtak 1016:Pagra 1003:shtak 998:Pagra 976:plane 927:shtak 922:Pagra 791:Sorry 642:ESkog 129:plane 16:< 1841:jaco 1791:jaco 1778:talk 1729:jaco 1684:talk 1656:jaco 1481:talk 1466:digg 1190:! — 1078:Weys 1073:Cyde 990:and 971:jaco 908:talk 897:. -- 883:talk 861:talk 719:talk 675:hier 585:talk 580:Aude 576:talk 505:GFDL 498:GFDL 449:Talk 302:talk 294:fast 236:Rory 220:talk 124:Jaco 1861:LBA 1338:Hey 572:RFA 296:. 57:I, 1776:| 1769:-- 1682:• 1617:-- 1551:? 1478:| 1062:. 905:| 880:| 858:| 808:-- 644:) 592:) 587:| 559:. 548:. 537:. 535:}} 529:{{ 513:{{ 501:}} 495:{{ 447:| 365:-- 304:) 246:96 218:| 121:? 1115:. 1095:) 755:| 716:★ 582:( 416:R 300:( 241:0

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index