User talk:Jallan - Knowledge (XXG)

1258:

a while a split on VfD between the "every high school is notable and deserves an article" group and "most high schools are not notable". The not-notable votes have tended to be outvoted resulting in keeping of what were often only stubs which never did get fixed up and only get in the way of people searching on the web for information on a school when the same bad stub comes up again and again on Knowledge (XXG) mirrors. Currently, the tendency seems to be the other way, for the first time, I think, perhaps because it has become more and more obvious that these articles don't get cleared up and that no-one knows what good articles would be for ordinary schools. The path you are following, that of recording the news of a single school year, seems to me far too granular for the Knowledge (XXG) project, to be unsustainable, unless you intend a master article on each school with dependant articles for every school year. If so, you should indicate this.

1397:

substance of most Knowledge (XXG) high school articles which don't provide any reason why a particular high school is notable and often don't say much at all. An encyclopedia article should not provide only the minutiae of present day information such as the name of the current prinipal and whether a football team is doing well, all likely to be out of date even a year from now. Yet a history of a high school would be mostly nothing but such disjointed minutiae: names of principals, lists of teaching staff, awards won each year by teams or bands or clubs, average grades obtained compared to other schools, additions and renovations of the building, and so forth. Such an article would be encyclopedic. But people don't write them.

1304:

not every high school will include an article. I think that even now, Knowledge (XXG) contains articles that all Wikipedians until today have written because they wanted. There are many things or events in the world that probably deserve a space in Knowledge (XXG), but no one has written about it yet. What I am saying is: If there is interest in a High School, let the interested Wikipedian write about it and don't destroy his/her work. Maybe only a few High Schools will get a Knowledge (XXG) article. Maybe many. But why should we bother about the ones that nobody has written about yet? Let the interested parties write about them.--

1373:

particular school during a few years of their lives at most. Immediate family also care while a child or sibling is attending such a school. But most don't think that their school is special or notable or stands out. That most high school articles are uniformative stubs reflects the fact that the editor writing such an article either doesn't care much or just can't make a good article from information easily available oor both. What people do care about is their own years in "high school" in general rather than about the history of the particular high school or high schools that they attended.

826:

Danes or Jutes, had special agendas, such as Curt Weibull (it was only a skirmish in his academic wars, and he even talked of "killing" the disciples of his enemies. He was very succesful in killing them). Almost every single page I can find on the Geats on the Internet either does the same or consider it to be the most likely identification. Do you think it is worthwile trying to standardize the terminology (calling the Gautar Geats) or do you find the identification too uncertain? I'd also like to thank you for the work you're putting into the mythology part.--

2403:

my heart). But how do you, in Knowledge (XXG), spell a hooked o with an accent over it, which is rarely a problem, I admit, unless you are transliterating Old Icelandic, where the difference was real? I mean, it's OK to use ö instead of the hook, when ö suffices, but when you are, say, giving examples of old poetry, where there was a real difference, (ö is an umlaut of a, o with a hook and an accent is an umlaut of á), one being short, the other long, what do you do? If all this has been discussed to death, I apologize. As I said, I've been away.

2289:), of the arguement or arguments you consider vital and germane to the discusion and vote. Frankly, MOST all of you are being silly over nothing of particular importance, since both names can be redirected into the one used. I have left a comment concerning my contribution to the article, which contribution — seems to have triggered the current edit and revision wars. For that I apologize, but see the Comments on the vote. I am also taking the liberty of putting the vote section AFTER the Comments about same. 1024:

tragic event. When he arrives, he falls asleep, or is it a trance?, and the guide reveals himself to be the spirit of the general who died in battle, or committed suicide etc. (It's often unclear whether the revelation is real or not.) The farmers who started the legend in Shingo need not have been aware of Noh, a dramatic form of the military aristocracy; Noh had arisen from peasants' art forms, and legends of the sort that the plays present might have been common.

1381:

is attending. Then, they have interest after graduating, because the school is always part of their personal histories. So, in this case, 3000 people become interested every year. Over the course of 20 years it is 60,000 people that have or might have interest in the school at one point in their lives. And this doesn't count the people that might have interest in the school of an ex-alumni that suddenly becomes famous and starts appearing in the media.--

2802: 190:

the previous article was and how much it owed to POV's that scholars have long discarded. Even the out-of-date Catholic Encyclopedia entry on which is pre-Eissfeldt has a POV denying a connection between Moloch and Milcom, makes no mention whatsoever of Carthage or Melqart and all that and is honest enough to mention the theory it is possible that some child sacrifices were to Yahweh though it argues otherwise and quite possibly argues correctly.

324:(even the demons) can agree on. Yes, it would be difficult to call the Iraq War a "persecution" of Muslims and Arabs, because people in the US can be so completely convinced of its "humanitarianism," whether they mean "intended" or "genuine." People thought the Spanish American War was to "liberate" Cubans from the cruel Spanish; in the end some US admiral ordered his "troops" to kill everyone on a Philippine island over the age of "ten years." 303:

would be more useful to a researcher than attempting to settle in dogmatic NPOV fashion whether something was persecution or not. If you disagree, then set down your ordering that is in your mind and see if there is any consensus to accept it. Otherwise you will only inspire revert wars to get that category off various entries (and people who don't want such wars will want it off also rather than face another POV to argue about).

2566:(i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. 21: 1794:

style of pottery or kind of grave did not mean a new people in the area, but just a new style of pottery or new burial customs.) But traditions about origins are also often confused, and ancient historians, like many modern ones (and like many editors in Knowledge (XXG)) were quite ready to fill in blanks with whatever dubious information they could find. (The

2550: 1056:

Knowledge (XXG) articles. I don't think that the idea of making a Knowledge (XXG) article as a class project for English or Journalism is far fetched. Once teachers all over the world start noticing Knowledge (XXG) as a powerful tool, I don't think that the "DELETE" community will be able to stop schools from becoming an integral part of Knowledge (XXG).

2130:) for subdivision of the bibliography into References (=sources actually used for the article) and Further reading, if you're up for it. Several people are working to improve the article now it's been nominated for FAC, but I'm thinking maybe you have the most expertise of them, and that's what the referencing job needs.--] 19:06, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2626: 1756:

or more different accounts of the supposed historical Arthur, some by very competent scholars, but all different. The arguments themselves are often worth the reading and worth repeating. But then other top scholars present other arguments equally strong for competing theories. I often point out that someone reading the

281:"If you want a persecution category then obtain clear consensus guidelines for it that detail what constitutes persecution with clear examples of where it applies and where it doesn't. If there is no consensus for such guidelines and examples, then it's all individual POV and there should be no category. 2528:

For your information: I have made a new text for the Norwegian corresponding article about Vikar since the previous text tried to, rather doubtfully, establish the figure as historic rather than a legendary figure. My new text is much closer to your English article. There have been though a few edits

1793:

either way. Archaelogy and linguistic study can very seldom prove individual pieces of history, but usually doesn't disprove it either. (Again and again when archaeology does seem to prove or disprove something, suddenly some archaelogist will show that the entire system dating is wrong or that a new

1003:

interesting. The articles could be copied to subpages of a Knowledge (XXG): or User: page. They might not need to be protected, as long as there is a prominent message regarding their status (seeing as they would be outside the encyclopedia space). If you want to run this experiment, I'll be happy to

2593:

that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped

2557:

in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have

2402:

I've been away from Knowledge (XXG) for a long time, and you have no time as it says on your page, but since you are apparently the person to ask, I have this question: What was originally a hooked o is now spelt, by consensus, as ö. Well and good. I can accept that (although the hooked o is dear to

1798:

traces Attila the Hun's kin back to Scandinavia.) Perhaps the puzzle pieces don't fit and never will, but there is nothing gained by hiding them when nothing has been proved to the point of general consensus. And in any cases, statements from ancient historians are worth citing just because they are

1755:

If you are doing a book about possible history underlying legends, then that kind of POV is quite expected and not at all disreputable. You should put forth your theories, not hold them back. But I've probably been rendered immune to attempts to extract fact from legend, in part by reading seventeen

1729:

I won't say, "Don't go", because I don't know the details. You've done a lot of good work that will remain. And this is project where people can participate at any time to the exact level at which they wish to, a place where one can jot down one's own notes on various things one is interested in for

1303:

My opinion here is again that although at the beginning you get minutiae, since Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia, with time contributors will replace MINOR information with more important and relevant information. Some information currently in the article will survive, some will be replaced. And

1257:

And mirror sites will want to mirror something different to stand out, not just Knowledge (XXG). What value to be just another of hundreds of mirror sites showing exactly the same Knowledge (XXG) content? But part of what Knowledge (XXG) must not do now is to try to be everything. There has been for

1238:

Fortunately, there will certainly be forks in Knowledge (XXG)'s future and competing projects or partially competing projects, partly because no volunteer project could sustain the kind of pressure of being anything close to the single source of information on all topics. The pressure alone would be

1121:

Regarding covering the present, the problem is that this school started operations in 1998 (I believe). My main source of information is the web, and it's hard to find articles about events that happened before 2003. I guess that with time that will change. Also, I guess that some students of the

262:

I respectfully disagree. Persecution is a serious subcategory of violence, under which discrimination and harrassment are less serious subcategories, but there is some overlap. Some would justifiably argue that 9-11 was 'latent anti-Americanism' taken to the level of persecution. There is a case for

2276:

This is the message I've been dropping on anyone on the Talk or Article pages since 13 May, I'd appreciate it if you can familarize yourself on the small article and stand-by to jump in on Tuesday with some cogent watersprays from a logical firehose! Thanks for the trouble -- the issue is trivial,

1380:

In this case, this high school produces about 1000 graduates every year. This means that about 1000 prospective students (maybe more, because some have interested but never enroll) and their parents have some interest every year. Then, they have interest during the course of the years the student

1323:

Maybe, but I don't see another medium for it yet. I have contributed on different articles in Knowledge (XXG), and just recently decided on creating an article about this school, and make it better than the school's own web site, make it informative, interesting, and of Knowledge (XXG) value. But

1019:

I can't imagine historians ever working out the details of the origin of the legend, but I've imagined that it started with two Christian (Catholic) missionaries, among the many who were active in the Tohoku region in the 1500s and early 1600s. They might have been priests or brothers, and/or could

796:

Jallan, you really went above and beyond the call of duty in trying to eliminate the B-Movie Bandit once and for all. Unfortunately he's back, he's reverting articles and it's business as usual for the jerk. Others are still happily formatting these stupid things since, heaven forbid, information

648:

Thanks for standing up and voicing your opinion. It angers me that people are hiding behind "it's fact so it can't be deleted". Oftentimes, I don't think a lot of these advocates know the full extent of this stuff. It's been going on for at least four months. See the beginning of my first talk page

492:

As a practical matter, by the way, for articles on Jews and Judaism I happen to prefer the time-tested Encyclopedia Judaica system as a usable, practical compromise between standard modern Hebrew and historical purity. Do you know anything about Unicode for the special symbols in that system (e.g.

488:

If you could do that for the Tiberian points that would be wonderful. I cannot do it myself for two reasons: (a) because my graduate courses in Biblical Hebrew and Aramaic were far too many years ago for me to remember this stuff; and (b) because I know absolutely nothing at all about how they are

189:

I have contacted him on his talk page asking him about his concerns. If they are stylistic, he might be able to improve the article or suggest improvements. (Unfortunately getting as technical as I did did made some of the early presentation somewhat turgid.) He may simply not realize how incorrect

127:

There is quite a bit more to add to Agenor and Phoenix genealogy which I will get to eventually, unless someone else does. But outside of idiosyncratic genealogical links and inconsistant genealogical information, everything that applies to Phoenix in some texts can be found applied Agenor in other

1295:

The problem is that the issue is bigger than your article alone. What kind of encyclopedia article can one write about a normal high school that is not simply what is happening at the moment? Do we want mere lists of minutiae for every year for each high school? Yes, we do, if we want to find that

1105:

I would quite like to see such material existing on the web, but possibly another project than Knowledge (XXG) would be the proper forum, just as the rambot articles, really, are not appropriate to Knowledge (XXG) though they are tolerated here. The conflict I am having is that I really think that

1093:

I don't think so. A 70-year old high school would probably have NATIONAL awards, that will REPLACE the State awards currently on the article. It would probaly have Nationally or Internationally famous Ex-Alumni, that will REPLACE the local recipients of $ 500 grants currently on the article. It

1023:

After the missionaries died, the people might have come to believe that one was truly Jesus. This would be sort of a reversal of the story line of many Noh plays: in them, a wandering priest arrives at a place where he meets a person and asks to be shown the location of a battle, suicide, or other

825:

When I arrived at Knowledge (XXG), "Geats" was already used as the name for the Gautar/Götar. Almost everything seems to point to the conclusion that they are one and the same, and I consider etymology to be a fairly reliable source. Moreover, the Swedish authorities who has claimed that they were

302:

I've seen too many bad categories. I mostly stay away from all that. And I dislike the entire idea of heirarchical categories. This looks like another bad category. You might have a single non-heirarchical category of "claimed persecution" that was NPOV to allow searching for all such claims. That

1396:

Notable high schools, like notable people, or notable organizations of any kind, would be those mentioned in media as being recognized for some reason other than merely existing and performing their normal, mundane functions. The repetative litany that "high schools are notable" is belayed by the

1044:

Delete. I appreciate the work the writer is doing here. But...would the author cover the similar material for every year to the same depth if the school were seventy years old? Does the author expect this article to be maintained to the same depth for the next forty years, for this and every high

598:

Would you be alright with the plan I stated above: I plan on putting Encyclopedia Frobozzica (from which all these entries come) on Wikisource and linking (or even redirecting) from the various entry names on Knowledge (XXG). Most likely, I'll put a short stub for each of the entries on Knowledge

397:

Actually, we tried mediation. I put some introductory observations (inherently POV on my part, subject to further overview). The next thing IZAK did was bring the complete argument over the the mediation request page. Also, mediation was rejected and instead there was supposed to be additional

352:

The opinion differences between US and the rest of the world is due a administration and media-induced ignorance, and this ignorance (unintended it may be) is itself a cause for "anti-American sentiment." "Dont speak too soon for the wheel's still in spin..." yes, but this is possible to do among

286:

I would agree with this, except that in my mind there can be a logical ordering of these issues into what they are. Ill plead guilty that my use of the classification question is to effect improvement in the articles themselves, by catalysing the questions, "what does this fit under" and "what is

163:

I've attempted to incorporate some of the material from the alternative viewpoint on this page. However, I can see you do raise important and serious concerns. If you have time, please have a quick look at the article and add a {msg:disputed} flag and/or re-add the NPOV marker if you're not happy

2209:

I don't have any great preference, but want to get something started to clear up the maze of redirects and strange spellings that currently afflict the Norse mythology articles. (Actually, many of them aren't strange, it is just that they don't agree with one another.) As you have mentioned, you

1799:

said by ancient historians. Even if statements are shown to be incorrect, they have the value of evidence against those who would put total faith in everything that an ancient historian claims and are often valuable for showing what people formally believed. I will continue to keep an eye on the

1165:

And I would not want Knowledge (XXG) to ever become the "main" source of information in the world. (Imagine the edit conflicts! Argggh! Millions of dollars might depend on getting a single line into a Knowledge (XXG) article and making it stay there. Kids and teachers at Dr. Michael M. Krop High

443:

liturgical transliteration. I think these are perfectly valid and worthy of participation, but not at the total expense of every other Hebrew linguistics study concern. Please support a multi-religious multi-cultural scientific NPOV mandate for studying Hebrew linguistics on Knowledge (XXG). -

551:

with redirects. Notability should be the key for both fictional and non-fictional articles. Are the subjects of the articles likely to appear mentioned casually in works unrelated to the place or places where they are primariliy mentioned? We don't want an article on every person mentioned in a

360:

But perhaps not by using with blanket categories which oversimplify, especially something like "persecution" which is so often claimed where closer examinations shows it should not be. And some people deserve to be persecuted, i.e. trolls to take a trivial example. Also compulsive liars (of any

2214:

Hi Jallan, no I have nothing against you changing the names into more normal English adaptations. I don't mind at all. Concerning the spelling, and I am going to add that to the discussion page, I am starting to think that we should either go the whole hog and have a hypercorrect spelling with

2138:

Jallan, thank you very much for your full answer. I'm only sorry to say it's a bit wasted on my Talk page, this is far from being my field. I do know about references and bibliographies, I deal with them in my day job as you do, and I have a couple of points there (though I don't honestly know

1055:

within the next 2 years. Students all over the world are using Knowledge (XXG) and will use even more as an enciclopedic reference tool. I believe that as time passes, more and more studends, and probably even the school teachers and/or administrators, will be involved in maintaining their own

1730:

others to appreciate, at least such notes as are encyclopedic. And then one can hopefully see them corrected or bettered. And if worsened by a later editor, well the originals are still in the history. And it is so nice to be able to actually change errors in material one reads! There is not

1372:

Most high schools are normal high schools much like any other normal high school. People mostly neither know nor care about any of them individually. Those who care about a particular school are mostly those employed at that school or by the local Board of Education or who are attending that

1692:

Yes, I agree with the naming, it is very hard. As I use Swedish works of reference, I am restricted to Swedish forms and as often as I remember, I try to look for a common English form. Perhaps, the best solution would be to stick to the Old Icelandic forms all the way (except for Thor and

2125:

seems to have gotten doubled when you edited it, would you like to take a look at it? (I'm uncertain as to which bits represent your changes, I'd better not mess with it.) Incidentally, if you know about this stuff, would you maybe like to turn the primary sources (the eddas) into proper

590:

article. We've had other cases where short articles about fictional universes have been merged for the same reasons. Knowledge (XXG) is intended as an encyclopedia, not a biographical dictionary or place name dictionary. There is difference of emphasis between the two, which is sometimes

1404:

As mentioned before, after 20 years of starting operations, a high school would be of interest or potential interest to at least 50,000 people. And with the growth in Knowledge (XXG) an in Wikipedian numbers, I am sure that articles of high schools will eventually evolve to become more

783:

to delete the article about the Bradley Amendment because it was a POV rant. Even though the discussion period has run out, no one's acted on that thread yet. I've completely rewritten the article. I'd appreciate it if you'd take a read through and see if it's now worthy of a keep.

2345:

If you are local to Japan, some history of the canals or Sea-channel is certainly germane to the ongoing discussion, moreover, any cogent arguement you condsider being particularly telling needs to be clearly repeated in the current on going comments if you want them counted on in the

217:

is a site of frequent heated edit wars, and the more heated editors generally won't accept anything more than the Modern Israeli Hebrew and Standard Arabic names for the city. I've even heard some of the expanded forms derisively called "pseudo-IPA" and such. That's why I linked to

2514:

I was told to merge my article on Hannibal and Melqart with this article I tried my best to fit it appropriately, feel free people to rearrange its positioning. By the way this article on Melqart rocks I struggle to find information on the subject but this is superb, great job!!!

310:"For example, it seems to me that within the US in respect to anti-terrorist government policy that people who strongly support the current government position and those who are against the current government position can probably in individual cases claim persecution by others. 1106:

what you are doing is probably about the best that can be done for a normal, non-notable, high school. And it's not encyclopedic because it covers only the present. (This is a problem with many articles in Knowledge (XXG), contributed by editors fixated only on what is current.)

2292:

Still, I have just spent over four hours of valuable spare time, and would welcome your thoughts after you read and understand the distinction I put forth between a governments termonology as a governing body and a geographical reference like an archepelego, which it certainly

661:

I'd like to thank you as well. This person has exceptionally pained Mike due to the subject matter, or perhaps the lack of it. It's pained me simply because I care about how this site should be treated, and even my shortest contributions have not only been useful IMO, but I

1166:

School in great editorial fights to insure that the entire world sees the correct viewpoint about some event happening in Dr. Michael M. Krop High School that year because on that single article depends how the world views their school. School boards would get in on the act.

469:

be true, because otherwise they could never have adopted that pointing in any of their texts. However, at the same time, their Hebrew is not best represented by the Tiberian points, which they adopted over the course of time later in history, by rather by the Babylonian

1045:

school? I am close to voting Keep on this one and would interested in AAAAA's comments because, unusually for high schools, we have a very capable editor who is obviously trying very hard and intelligently to create an excellent article. Jallan 17:56, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)

1027:

Having identified the missionaries as Jesus and his brother, the people could then have tried to make the other pieces of the puzzle fit. They would rely on the teachings of the missionaries, as well as stories they had told about travels that they or others had done.

1085:

and the response by another user. The difficulty is granularity. To cover a 70-year old high school in the depth you are attempting here would probably amount to writing a short book on the school. And yet you have not yet named in full the current teaching staff by

572:

to Zork information on the web, both Wiki-source and other. I think that would be more useful than numerous short stubs requiring a user to jump from entry to entry, entries which are unlikely to ever be looked up directly from the Search box. Almost any mention of

423:

studies. I'm trying to challenge mono-cultural mono-sectarian dominance over a linguistic field that we all should be sharing together. I invite you to participate in trying to pluralize Hebrew language conventions for Knowledge (XXG). In particular, not only is

1584:

because I think much more people interested about the sagas are looking there. Let us wait one week (one week? Wiglaf writes a dissertation and it will take some time until Io is back again) for more feedback and see then what actions should be done. Best regards

1898:, the officer choose to misunderstand the German offices use of the phrase "discuss surrender terms" and told the officer that his small band of paratroopers would like to take a whole German division prisoner but there was not room in the building for them all. 812:

You might want to be just a bit more careful with your redirects; I fixed several of yours that weren't properly typed. For reference, the correct format is #REDIRECT ]. I'm not admonishing you; I'm just trying to keep the mess on Knowledge (XXG) to a minimum.

1051:

Regarding the question if the article will be maintained with the same depth for the next forty years: I think that Knowledge (XXG) is quickly becoming the MAIN source of enciclopedic information IN THE WORLD. I envision wikipedia getting a TOP 100 place in

374:

ROFL. All your points are well taken. I will consider them carefully in my verdict; though I feel a slight favoritism toward action on the classification idea than inaction, I will do so in a way that generates dialogue and consensus, whatever that may be.

1764:

are mostly history, and that the characters have nothing at all to do with Gundahari, Attila the Hun, Theodoric the Goth and so forth, but are historical princes of Saxony and surrounding regions, though ones not actually mentioned in surviving history.)

2353:. Now is the time to take a deep breath, for rational concise summaries, not all the arguing that is so wearisome in 66 printed pages - half a novelette, I'd guess! It's certainly a lot to ask your fellow editors to wade through on a minor issue. 1742:

I got that impression from the way the discussion concentrated on the possible historical elements and ignored the entire Valkyrie lover element found in the tales of all three of the Helgi figures. The result is something like a discussion of

2617: 1315:

Unfortunately, on the topic you have chosen, the excellence of what you are doing is far from the only issue. Are you producing an excellent article of a kind that should not actually be in Knowledge (XXG) but in some other more specialized

2152:, along with my original question? It's quite an active page at the moment. I hope you'll agree, but I won't do it until I hear from you, in case you'd rather not get inexorably drawn into the Ginnungagap.--] 02:20, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC) 981:

I've taken your comment into due consideration, and have listed this page on the VfD for a public vote. If people there think it can never possibly be more than a stub in regards to the full number of possible entries, then so be it.

2554: 2594:

for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the

1420:

And there's no point in retaining bad stubs when it would be just as easy for a knowledgeable editor to start an article fresh. Knowledge (XXG) is not improved by bad articles that don't improve and are unlikely to improve.

128:

texts, including some of the genealogical links. A full discussion of Agenor alone would end up saying almost everything that can be said about Phoenix (and vice versa). They are impossible to separate in a full discussion.

797:

must not be lost! Result: I've lost whatever interest that I had in contributing to this project. I'm not blanking my pages, but nor am I planning on returning. Best way to reach me during the week is my work e-mail:

2143:

hardasses are going to insist on a division into "references used" vs. "further reading", they always do). But that's unfortunately the sum of my competence here, I only got drawn into some superficial copyediting of

763:

OK, I see your point. Would you agree that the characters "correspond to each other" in particular stories? BTW, I appreciate your edits, but don't the diacritics make it harder for non scholars to search the names?

319:

Well, certainly there is a tendency of problematic wars to come back home; toothpaste may not go back in the tube, but the real ugly and dangerous demons need to go back in the box regardless; that's something that

2101:

had asked me, among other things, for a cooling off period of about two weeks between he and I. That time has now passed. In case you're interested, I wanted to let you know that I have reopened the discussion at

917:

I don't think clan would work. I don't recall it ever being used in English translations, probably because there's nothing particularly like a clan in the old accounts, no word corresponding in Old English or Old

2251:, (thence to then YOU! Congrats! Booby Prize, but I badly need some responisble People to help me mediate therein that are familiar with things Japanese... Sorry, but I infer that's still YOU!) in the last month 2757:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 718:

I did nominate the kings of Numenor pages for deletion and it seems that they're too popular. Apparently my factual pages on election results are far less notable than lists of names out of a Tolkein appendix.

1113:

I think Knowledge (XXG) is the perfect place. You are right that the school is still non-notable, but I have no doubt that with years it will have some kind of national interest (as most high schools will, I

2277:(Is proper name plural or singular, Forsooth!) save there seem to be at least two teens in a war going well over three hundred edits in this one month sampling interval, over 70 edits in the past three days. 1265:

I have no intention of writing an article on EACH school. For now, I am only interested in ONE school. But I am already working on getting other people involved, so the article keeps evolving for years to

899:

By ??? I meant any kind of phrase such as "generally held to be the same as". Since there is no obvious alternative name for the house of Yngling, I'd vote for keeping it as it is. One possibility could be

1173:

This WILL happen (if not happening right now already). The higher traffic Knowledge (XXG) gets (and it is climbing), the higher probability of this occurring. I and believe it WILL happen, eventually.--

257:

might belong under persecution if you can find somewhere some people who are being persecuted for that anything, wherever exactly the lines between opposition, discrimination, and persecution are drawn."

585:

that prompts a user to look up the name is probably going to be explicitly in context that mentions Zork. So put the information all together, using an annotated list of persons and characters within a

2210:

generally use Swedish sources and often accordingly use Swedish spellings. Do you have any objections to me generally changing those spellings to more normal English adaptations of the Norse originals?

1751:

Great, you seem to know a great deal about this legend. Concerning the dating, the author is pretty believable. He was once one of the foremost scholars. That does not mean that he was right, though.

291:

have some postive effects within the articles for defining the scope and discerning genuine material from the pap, and this in turn might make the editing of these more reasonable. Thats where one's

1894:

And yes "school boy humour" is childish! But it is from that play on words, that a whole strand of British humour comes. For example instead of saying "nuts" when asked to surrender at the brige in

2647: 239:

I've quickly cobbled up some of your thoughts on the Hellenistic literary approach (leaving out some casual asides), in the hopes that you'll look over this new section and bring it up to speed.

1350:

I vote to delete most high school articles not just because the article is a stub but because most schools are not notable and won't ever ever generate an encyclopedia article beyond a bad stub.

2722:

when it is apparent that you haven't actually bothered to read qualifications as to the problem at hand. Please try to reacquaint yourself with the art of discussion as opposed to abuse! --

2390:

Well that's my heads up, and appeal -- Hope you can help. I really don't have a dog in this fight! If you can alert a few others qualified on matters Japanese, by all means, please do so!

2296:

More to the point, I'd like to see your defense regarding your favorite POV of what I had to say viz a viz the mergest attitude of the senior editors and administrators that frequent the

682:

Uh, you seem to have put your VfD listing above mine, although it comes after it in time. Just a mistake, I'm sure, and I don't suppose it'll really confuse anybody, in fact never mind.

2478:

If you're still interested in the topic, I wonder whether you'd be kind enough to allow me to merge the daughter article into the new article. They seem to have an 80 percent overlap.

2670: 1202:

There would be thousands of undercover Wikipedians paid to assure that what their employers want to appear is what does appear. There are suspicions that some of this is happening now.

415:

is trying to decide all Hebrew linguistics issues for Knowledge (XXG) by themselves. But Hebrew is not purely the realm of Judaism; it is also the realm of Samaritans, Christians and

1048:

My guess is that if the school was 70 years old, it would have many famous alumni and it would have received several national awards. As of now, the school is too young to have that.

338:

So, yes, reality and fantasy have some distance between them. A great little test of this schism with reality might be to try put the Iraq War under the "humanitarianism" category.

1760:

would never be able to extract the truth about characters like Gunther, Etzel, Dietrich, and Ermanaric. (Of course Heinz Ritter claims that the legends, at last as presented in the

1136:

The difference between a Knowledge (XXG) article and a Web Log for a school is that a Web Log would the "journal", and an article evolves (with time) to a more enciclopedic state.--

1445:

Hello. You don't appear to be an administrator, but I think you should be. If you would like for me to nominate you, I will do so. You may reply here or on my talk page. Regards,

2869: 2481:

If I'd seen your article first, I might have merged the other direction. But as things stand, the new article is linked in quite a few places, as part of a series of articles on

1482:. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. You might find the new 2864: 1715:

article? An anonymous user keeps insisting on removing the accounts of Jordanes and Procopius. I am so tired of reverting those changes that I am taking a long break from it.--

1016:

Thanks for the work on the Shingo page. The legend is of course controversial. Nobody will be surprised to find people posting rants and dissertations there from time to time!

465:(One technical note on what you wrote: Yemenite Jews read Hebrew in a way, as you suggest, that may be correctly extrapolated from texts with Tiberian pointing. This in fact 331:

I was thinking more of individual people losing jobs, etc. because they disagree with the local consensus or the boss on the issues, whether they are right-wing or left-wing.

1983: 2300:

discussions. To my recollection, I don't recollect any of you hotheads in this dispute ever spending anytime thereon, possibly excepting Mel Etitis, but rarely even then.

1082: 485:), describing when and how they have been used, by whom and for what purposes, what the rationale behind each one is, and what each one's weaknesses and advantages are. 780: 515:

Dear Jallan, I constantly humbled by your knowledge of Norse mythology. I have suggested that Bordeur's transcription is to be a norm for Knowledge (XXG) articles.

2643: 2446: 755:

Why is the connection between these two characters so controversial? They apparently correspond to each other in at least two stories in two related traditions.--

1915: 1911: 1738:

Yes, the purpose of the book is to try to find the kernels of real history behind the legends. I did not realize that I had transposed that POV into the article.

2016: 1919: 1617: 2360:

a dozen other Administrators I'm acquainted with take a look at the debate after the time below. I will in fact ask for twenty commitments, so be clear and

2164:, and I thought you might be interested in commenting on a broader application of the formatting to other city articles. The discussion (for now) is at 2830: 1483: 1475: 731:

I like your work on the naming in Norse mythology. Could you only please see to it that the links work afterwards. An example: in the page your renamed

2632: 1220:

For something comparable, did you know that reviewers for amazon.com are sometimes sent free copies of books by publishers if they will write reviews?

2366:

Thankyou for your time, attention, and good professional behaviour. I'll check the Talk state again no sooner than Monday around Noon (UTC), And ask

1818: 633: 626: 535: 63: 365:

is a weighted term. I think attempting to include terms weighted with POV as categories is most unwise! I can amuse myself by imagining a category

1191:

Maybe the limit will be the size of a Knowledge (XXG) article. Maybe these kind of lists will be deleted by average wikipedians. I don't know.--

666:

go back over my contribs every so often to check for inaccuracies and such. In fact, I just realized that I goofed on an article of mine, namely

2559: 694:

Absolutely, that's fine. See how close the listings are in time, too? Maybe my twin will be younger than yours when s/he returns to earth. :-)

1821:. I think we are nearly there, though there are a small number of points to resolve. I look forward to receiving your comments in due course. 1147:

It would probably be a good thing if every high school and public school and local charity and university club and so forth had one of these.

2782: 2464: 2103: 1882:

You might appreciate this quote from Dylan Thomas (I hope I'm remembering it correctly): "I am in love with the shape and sound of words."

974: 35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 2434: 1864:

Jallan, thanks for the info about International English. I'd like to learn more. Do you know any decent online references about this?

2814: 2661: 1747:

which concentrated on the political relationships between Geats, Swedes, Danes, and Heathobards and ignored Grendel and the dragon.

1557: 2488:

Perhaps you'd like to simply edit the new article with info from your article, then we can do a redirect from old to new? Thanks! --

1950:

all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the

614:

Since you participated in the discussion on this subject, could you express your opinion on what to do with the substub template at

1530: 934:). Every person had to belong to an ätt in order to have some kind of legal security, and children and freed thralls were formally 2702:

I see that you've had no experience of Knowledge (XXG) to speak of since 2005. I would suggest that you should remind yourself of

2657: 2442: 2426: 459: 412: 27: 2778: 2482: 942:

had been around for several hundred years, as the sagas claim, there would have been hundreds of men claiming to belong to the

68: 58: 47: 2438: 2418: 481:

article. The idea would be to present the different systems of transliteration one at a time (not letter by letter as in

2187:

Hi, Jallan. I will try to help mediate with this, but probably won't be able to give it any deliberation until tonight.

2769:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2000: 1947: 1277:

But eventually downloading of every high school yearbook into Wiki-source or a comparable project will probably happen.

73: 2774: 1828:

Thanks for the heads up on talk about my changes to the Manual Jallan, I have left my thoughts on the subject there.

1651: 1471: 131:

And beyond genealogy there's almost nothing to be said about either. They are just links in the genealogical chain.

599:(XXG), along with a link to the specific entry on Wikisource. If you have any problems with that, let me know. -- 1357:

Maybe bad stubs should be deleted. I would not mind. But an article with a lot of effort into it, let it live.--

1899: 519:

I agree. How that is implemented is another question, but Brodeur's translation is great, as far as I can judge.

996: 84: 2195:

You're welcome, Jallan. Glad if I could help, one way or another. I figured why you were away. Happy new year.

1986:

Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at

1959: 2563: 92: 2817:. Please accept this friendly invitation from a member of the project. I can't wait for us to work together! 1053: 850:

for Beowulf. Considering the fact that most Anglophones have heard of the Geats, but have never heard of the

267:... and thats the nature of pov... But "persecution" by its most general definition should trancend pov, no? 1478:

before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the

1458: 1446: 1428:

I agree. Bad stubs should probably be removed. Articles with quite a lot of work on them should remain.--

615: 50:

to Knowledge (XXG). Please use the "move this page" link to move pages in future. You can find out more on

1725:

It was the next day, that I realized that I could ask you, since I am thinking of leaving Knowledge (XXG).

478: 2770: 2247:... I'm just making the rounds to everyone that has made their mark on Tsushima Islands which lead me to 2727: 2381: 2371: 2286: 2169: 114: 2433:

has changed. Henceforth there are separate categories for Wikipedians who are professional linguists (

1129:

What your article feels like is the beginning of a kind of web log for Dr. Michael M. Krop High School.

955: 2558:

been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the

2342:

to finish the job. As it is, this matter will probably double the time it takes for such a simple job.

2011:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "

963: 706:

Thank you for the jeremiad on the village pump (re: naming policy). You saved me from going on one :)

2165: 2149: 1931: 926:

as a social unit bigger than a family but smaller than a tribe, there is a term in Scandinavian, the

650: 380: 2746: 2737: 951: 901: 582: 2846: 2822: 2472: 1621: 420: 154: 2766: 2750: 2502:

You are listed in the linguist by profession category. Would you please look at the discussion at

2126:

bibliograpical references, from their present sad state? There's also a need (proclaimed by me on

862:(??? Gauts)" as is already done concerning other names, e.g. "Hrólf Kraki (Hrodhulf)" and "Adils ( 165: 2534: 2216: 1841: 1716: 1703: 1685: 1670: 1633: 1590: 1580:

Dear Jallan, I wished I would have found this informations one month ago. I moved your answer to

1565: 1491: 983: 967: 905: 892: 827: 765: 756: 744: 416: 219: 106: 2703: 2590: 2449:). You are currently listed under the former category; please reassign yourself if necessary. — 1990:

those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

2801: 1970:

license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Knowledge (XXG)'s license, the

2598:. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through 2506:? It has been suggested that professional opinions are required to resolve the dispute there. 2084: 2071: 1994: 1927: 1822: 1706:

and tell me whether they are NPOV. I have summarized them from a Swedish book from the 1920's.

1059:

Your KEEP vote will be greatly appreciated, when and if you change your mind. I hope so :) --

1005: 814: 773: 619: 578: 2762: 2754: 1474:. Congratulations!. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the 1081:

Your answers did not cover my questions. Please also check my comments on another article at

999:), I think your idea of taking 100 or whatever random pages and asking for comments would be 164:

with the results (with hindsight, I should have checked with you before removal). Thanks! --

80: 51: 2723: 2571: 2516: 2176: 1951: 1529:

Hi, Jallan. You might already know about this, but in case you don't ... there is a poll at

1503:

Congratulations, Jallan! We're in the same 'class,' so to speak! ] 21:43, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)

1031:

But of course all of this is speculation! I hope nobody ever takes my ramblings as history.

872: 667: 440: 149:. Thanks for fighting the good fight against cranks. I've been in that situation myself. -- 110: 88: 2765:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2758: 2707: 2599: 2297: 2140: 2127: 2028:

I agree to ] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

1923: 1711:

Since you're an administrator, and can revert easily, would you like to keep an eye on the

1606: 1454: 1296:

minutiae. It would be helpful if this were on the web. But should it be in Knowledge (XXG)?

2489: 2471:

article. Being unaware of your daughter article, I created an independent article called "

2450: 2161: 2145: 2122: 2115: 1610: 1581: 1551: 1517:

Thank you for the tone, balance and improved accuracy you've recently given this entry. --

482: 474:(supralinear), which corresponds exactly to actual usage with no need for extrapolation.) 429: 425: 376: 2595: 2323:

before I suspended that effort the other night because this shameful fued was going on —

1684:

Dear Jallan, I'd want to thank you for you great and inspiring work on the Norse sagas!--

398:

comment. Not sure, but I think this multi-user comment is what we've been seeing. :P -

2842: 2818: 2678: 2468: 2046:

I agree to ] all my contributions to any ], county, or city article as described below:

959: 801: 740: 732: 671: 637: 600: 445: 436: 399: 223: 150: 2492: 2349:

I will make sure this message goes to each contributor to the article the past month,

743:, which destroyed the link. I have been spending some time on making the links work.-- 2858: 2689: 2530: 2228: 2196: 2188: 2107: 1963: 1883: 1876:

Jallan, I love your comments and the quote. You made a beautiful, sonorous argument.

1865: 1853: 1662: 1625: 1586: 1561: 1534: 1487: 720: 695: 683: 587: 569: 561: 557: 345:

Which would have the same results as trying to put it under a "persecution" category.

477:

I want to urge you to make a special contribution, which perhaps would best be in a

2604: 2076: 1829: 785: 707: 574: 274:

Then so define it with examples of what fits and what doesn't and obtain consensus.

2653: 2660:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to 369:

to be applied to most "sacred" books. But I don't think it would help in any way.

2567: 2463:

Many years ago, when you were twee l'il thing, you originated an article called

2430: 2173: 2005: 1943: 1879:

But unfortunately, I expect the meaning will be lost on the intended audience.

1806: 1518: 1422: 1398: 1374: 1351: 1340: 1317: 1297: 1278: 1259: 1240: 1221: 1203: 1185: 1167: 1148: 1130: 1107: 1087: 1074: 931: 798: 736: 592: 311: 240: 191: 182: 132: 98: 2053:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "

2503: 1979: 1547: 1429: 1406: 1382: 1358: 1336: 1325: 1305: 1285: 1267: 1247: 1228: 1210: 1192: 1174: 1155: 1137: 1115: 1095: 1060: 670:. I'm not going to wait for the mistake to grow into fact. :^P Take care. - 20: 1852:

Hi, Jallan. You did an excellent job prosecuting the neutral spellings rule.

950:

was quite different from a Scottish clan. I don't insist on calling them the

2215:

thorns, eths and diachritic marks, or make the names as plain as possible.--

2098: 2019:. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page: 1644: 1479: 501: 494: 292: 214: 210: 204: 181:

has reverted your excellent new material. This is a problem user to watch.

54:. Here are some other useful links in case you haven't already found them; 1910:

Should RFC pages be placed on VfD to be deleted? I'm considering removing

1470:

I'm pleased to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an

2522: 1658: 1654: 1032: 888: 880: 2303:

In any event, I'm neutral here, and have asked that the article be kept

2753:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

2409: 1699: 884: 876: 863: 520: 2652:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

1094:

might have few instances of events that have some national interest.--

361:

philosphical persuasion whether they themselves know they are lying).

1895: 1800: 1712: 1343:

wrote at the Vfd discussion in another school, for further reference.

471: 178: 2625: 1930:. Your comments on whether I should do this would be appreciated. - 2850: 2786: 2731: 2692: 2677:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

2610: 2575: 2538: 2453: 2412: 448: 402: 226: 157: 135: 119: 2338:. I saved that on my hard drive, but I don't need to wade through 859: 855: 177:

User:Trc, a Roman Catholic apologist with no previous interest in

2635:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 2075:. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- 871:

I think that tribal names are fine in the plural, but I agree on

2529:

lately on the English article that you may want to check out. --

2148:

through voting on it on WP:FAC. Is it OK if I copy your post to

2139:

when/if I'll find the time to make them--I'll just say that the

2062: 2015:" template into their user page, but there are other options at 1971: 1004:

help you out; (or I could run it if you can't be bothered :P ).

565: 553: 146: 1819:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Manual of Style/Draft trim (November 2004)

854:

I will provide the other name in parenthesis, e.g. "Gauts (???

2441:) and Wikipedians who simply have an interest in linguistics ( 2080: 800:. I'm there during business hours Pacific, or UTC minus 7. - 145:

I noticed your participation in the discussion and editing of

15: 1781:

presented in history writing. One could just as well ask for

1184:

Should all A students be listed in the article on graduation?

1122:

school will eventually read the article and contribute to it.

2624: 1643:

Corrected old style signature. It conflicts with the actual

2097:

Hi, Jallan. Thanks for your support about the style guide.

2813:

You appear to be someone who may be interested in joining

1457:. Please reply there to accept the nomination. Good luck! 2668:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

2828: 1777:

argument is quite spurious as it can be claimed of many

1773:

from both history, linguistics and archaeology, and the

500:

Thanks! That software program you recommended is great.

251:

Hi, Jallan. Welcome and thanks for the honest critique.

2809:

You are cordially invited to join WikiProject Phoenicia

2718: 2712: 2679: 2586: 1666: 1629: 1594: 1569: 408:

Invitation for Hebrew linguistics project participation

2656:. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can 2166:

Talk: Tucson, Arizona#Other Arizona and nearby cities.

2104:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Manual of Style (jguk's changes)

1840:

Thanks for your kind comments about the article! :)--

1083:

Knowledge (XXG):Votes_for_deletion/Alonso_High_School

213:, I've been advised in the past that it's not wise. 203:

As much as I would really love to live every name of

1817:

FYI, I have (at last) responded to your comments on

2585:Hello. You are receiving this message because of a 842:for stories appearing in Scandinavian sources, and 1209:I am pretty sure that this is happening already.-- 975:List of real people appearing in fictional context 2745:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 2284:after you read my Comments in the subject dispute 2235:I Need your help on 'Move Tsushima Islands' Issue 1916:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Jwrosenzweig 1912:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Slrubenstein 1605:Dear Jallan, could you please take a look at the 1550:in the past. Maybe you have some time to look at 2544:Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity 1982:, to use our articles. Since you are among the 1920:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/John Kenney 821:What is your opinion on Gautar, Götar and Geats? 263:that, but in perspective, its a fine example of 199:Names of Jerusalem in the main Jerusalem article 109:? Clearly, each should have their own article. 2687:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge (XXG)! 2160:Hi. I saw that you voted on the RFC regarding 1560:. Would be happy to get your feedback. Thanks! 1546:Dear Jallan, I could see that you have editet 1613:. I am fully confident, that you do it right. 8: 2870:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages 2282:I would appreciate a rational explaination ( 2172:, if there's interest in doing so.) Thanks! 1618:User:Gangleri/tests/Unicode ISO 8859-1/Runes 634:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Hebrew languages 627:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Hebrew languages 536:Knowledge (XXG):Votes for deletion/Great Sea 432:transliteration, as some people want to use 91:. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 2865:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery 2562:and the userright will be restored per the 2356:I will also personally be making sure that 222:rather than listing all the names there. - 2443:Category:Wikipedians by fields of interest 2234: 560:article. Make redirects of these names to 2799: 2633:Doctor Dolittle Meets a Londoner in Paris 2618:Doctor Dolittle Meets a Londoner in Paris 2330:, unfortunately, on whether one uses the 995:From the discussion on the Village Pump ( 2650:to see how you can improve the article. 2560:Knowledge (XXG):Bureaucrats' noticeboard 1227:I didn't know, but I am not surprised.-- 649:archive. I'm accused of BEING that guy! 31:. Jallan has not edited Knowledge (XXG) 2716:, and escalating to an outright attack 1650:Maybe you have something to add to the 1552:Talk:Norse saga#Characters "Ǫ" == : --> 552:Shakespeare play either. So expand the 28:This user may have left Knowledge (XXG) 2806: 2321:I'd copyedited over two and half hours 779:Good evening, Jallan. On 26 Aug, you 462:was really quite impressive. Thanks. 2646:. You may like to take a look at the 2642:, which is recorded on the article's 2447:Wikipedians interested in linguistics 1558:Knowledge (XXG):Invalid article names 428:transliteration challenged, but also 7: 2710:before you start ranting at me (per 2465:Sefer haYashar (Biblical references) 1582:Talk:Norse saga#feedback from Jallan 1553:& # 4 9 0 ;< and "ǫ" == : --> 1531:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Manual of Style 460:Knowledge (XXG): WikiProject Judaism 2370:to do the same. PLEASE BE CONCISE. 413:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Judaism 79:If you have any questions, see the 2435:Category:Wikipedians by profession 2239:Hi! You appear to be an QUALIFIED 2065:, I would like to know that too. 1070:Problems with High School articles 14: 2771:review the candidates' statements 2638:The article has been assessed as 2061:". If you only prefer using the 1533:that you might be interested in. 493:het, zaddi with dots underneath)? 2800: 2548: 2458: 2351:so you are not being singled out 2121:Hi, Jallan. The Bibliography at 2017:Template messages/User namespace 2006:Free the Rambot Articles Project 1698:Could you please have a look at 1020:have been related as brothers. 887:is apparently taken. What about 265:the pot calling the kettle black 19: 2483:Lost books of the Old Testament 2055:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} 2049:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} 2031:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} 2013:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} 1453:I've posted your nomination at 458:That essay on the talk page of 2777:. For the Election committee, 2747:Arbitration Committee election 2738:ArbCom elections are now open! 2413:20:49, 19 September 2005 (UTC) 1734:to be a regular contributor. 1620:. You may take a look also at 1239:hideously counter-productive. 439:colloquial transliteration or 1: 2787:08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 2419:Category:Wikipedian linguists 2227:Jallan, sorry to see you go. 1926:. Each of them was listed by 419:as a whole, and also secular 2796: 2611:00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC) 2454:17:09, 9 November 2005 (UTC) 1997:- Lots of questions answered 1484:administrators' how-to guide 1476:administrators' reading list 64:How to write a great article 2851:10:12, 15 August 2020 (UTC) 2773:and submit your choices on 2262:help — Bring lots O water! 1783:conclusive evidence against 1622:Talk:Runic alphabet#Unicode 1616:It was hard for me to make 2886: 2779:MediaWiki message delivery 2732:01:49, 21 April 2015 (UTC) 2539:14:19, 14 March 2009 (UTC) 1954:Attribution-Share Alike ( 1872:Style guide: "Rock-ribbed" 1324:it obviously takes time.-- 1035:22:55, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC) 817:03:06, Sep 11, 2004 (UTC) 710:04:52, Aug 24, 2004 (UTC) 653:15:29, Aug 12, 2004 (UTC) 632:You are hereby invited to 504:03:50, Jul 22, 2004 (UTC) 497:09:45, Jul 21, 2004 (UTC) 287:this thing, really?" This 105:Why the move of Agenor to 2493:23:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC) 2395:Old Norse Spelling, again 2362:respectful of our time!!! 2231:05:20, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC) 2191:15:17, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2179:01:37, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2110:07:08, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1934:03:46, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1868:08:48, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1856:05:18, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1844:19:44, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1832:09:04, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1825:21:25, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1809:01:19, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1785:the Scandinavian origins. 1688:12:43, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1541:Old Icelandic characterrs 1521:23:48, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC) 1497:04:12, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC) 1465: 1425:19:55, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1401:19:55, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1377:19:55, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1354:19:55, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1339:, have copied below what 1320:19:55, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1300:19:55, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1281:19:55, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1262:19:55, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1243:19:55, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1224:19:55, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1206:19:55, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1188:19:55, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1170:19:55, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1151:19:55, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1133:19:55, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1110:19:55, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1090:19:55, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1077:19:55, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1008:08:39, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC) 970:20:04, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC) 908:19:18, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC) 830:08:32, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC) 804:05:11, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC) 751:Beowulf and Bödvar Bjarki 723:16:19, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC) 698:01:09, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC) 686:00:36, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC) 674:22:05, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC) 640:08:17, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC) 449:02:43, 18 July 2004 (UTC) 227:03:37, 28 June 2004 (UTC) 185:17:17, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC) 101:23:23, Nov 1, 2003 (UTC) 2693:10:55, 20 May 2014 (UTC) 2680:leaving us some feedback 2658:create articles yourself 2596:bureaucrats' noticeboard 2576:21:40, 9 July 2011 (UTC) 2459:Comin' back to haunt you 2384:03:09, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2374:03:09, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2219:19:14, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC) 2156:Tucson, Arizona and more 1902:11:14, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1886:06:50, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1719:16:33, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1636:17:07, 2004 Nov 18 (UTC) 1597:05:17, 2004 Nov 12 (UTC) 1572:20:52, 2004 Nov 11 (UTC) 1537:05:26, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1449:17:26, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC) 1441:Nomination for adminship 1432:21:16, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1409:21:16, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1385:21:17, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1361:21:16, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1328:21:16, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1308:21:16, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1288:21:16, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1270:21:16, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1250:21:16, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1231:21:16, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1213:21:16, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1195:21:16, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1177:21:16, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1158:21:16, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1140:21:16, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1118:21:16, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1098:21:16, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1063:18:38, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1039:Michael Krop High School 986:00:38, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC) 895:10:29, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC) 788:01:18, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC) 759:19:04, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC) 747:08:30, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC) 622:21:22, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC) 595:18:06, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC) 523:15:13, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC) 489:represented in Unicode. 403:09:14, 8 July 2004 (UTC) 314:18:47, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)" 243:01:26, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC) 194:17:41, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC) 168:00:49, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC) 158:23:41, 29 May 2004 (UTC) 136:15:18, 21 May 2004 (UTC) 120:03:29, 21 May 2004 (UTC) 83:, add a question to the 2616:Your submission at AfC 2253:trying to mediate this 2199:05:49, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC) 2168:(It might get moved to 1860:"International English" 1673:20:26, 2005 Mar 5 (UTC) 1461:04:26, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC) 997:Random page meanderings 603:19:19, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC) 384:22:14, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC) 2629: 2325:proper English grammer 991:Random page experiment 591:unfortunately missed. 556:article. Create a new 479:Hebrew transliteration 454:Hebrew transliteration 256:Anti-<anything: --> 2815:WikiProject Phoenicia 2751:Arbitration Committee 2662:Articles for Creation 2628: 2368:the uninvolved others 2287:Talk:Tsushima Islands 2183:International English 2069:what you think at my 2001:Multi-Licensing Guide 1966:if they prefer. The 1647:software version 1.4. 938:at the Tings. If the 616:Template talk:Substub 2591:administrator policy 2564:re-sysopping process 2555:community discussion 2467:, a daughter to the 2439:Wikipedian linguists 2340:yet another 70 edits 2150:Talk:Norse mythology 1900:Philip Baird Shearer 1486:helpful. Cheers! -- 834:I'll keep the forms 367:Religious propaganda 353:reasonable people. 247:What is persecution? 52:Knowledge (XXG):Move 2755:arbitration process 2498:linguist assistance 2473:Lost Book of Jasher 2427:user categorisation 2298:Knowledge (XXG):VfD 1995:Multi-Licensing FAQ 1554:& # 4 9 1 ;< 1154:I would not mind.-- 714:What is notability? 564:. Include links in 421:Canaanite languages 295:must be strong. ;) 2840: 2811: 2767:arbitration policy 2630: 2255:flaming revert war 2170:WikiProject Cities 2134:Norse mythology II 2067:Please let me know 2059:{{MultiLicensePD}} 1836:Helgi Hundingsbane 1789:Exactly. We don't 1704:Helgi Hundingsbane 1607:WP:RfD#November 11 1459:Wile E. Heresiarch 1447:Wile E. Heresiarch 966:would work fine.-- 417:Abrahamic religion 220:Names of Jerusalem 107:Agenor and Phoenix 69:Naming conventions 59:How to edit a page 33:since January 2005 2839: 2838: 2807: 2795: 1938:Article Licensing 1890:The third thought 956:Yngling (dynasty) 774:Bradley Amendment 39: 38: 2877: 2835: 2833: 2804: 2797: 2721: 2715: 2698:A word of advice 2682: 2607: 2581:Notice of change 2552: 2551: 2517:user:king Alaric 2421:recategorization 1974:, but it allows 1958:) v1.0 and v2.0 1952:Creative Commons 1946:to get users to 1906:RFC pages on VfD 1525:English versions 1405:"encyclopedic"-- 964:Ynling (lineage) 936:led into the ätt 873:House of Yngling 668:Tamiya Blackfoot 441:Ashkenazi Hebrew 23: 16: 2885: 2884: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2831: 2829: 2794: 2775:the voting page 2741: 2717: 2711: 2700: 2695: 2664:if you prefer. 2654:Knowledge (XXG) 2622: 2605: 2583: 2549: 2546: 2526: 2512: 2500: 2461: 2423: 2397: 2316: 2271: 2237: 2225: 2206: 2185: 2162:Tucson, Arizona 2158: 2146:Norse mythology 2136: 2123:Norse mythology 2119: 2116:Norse mythology 2095: 1944:started a drive 1940: 1932:Ta bu shi da yu 1908: 1892: 1874: 1862: 1850: 1838: 1815: 1682: 1661:. Best regards 1611:Talk:Norse saga 1543: 1527: 1515: 1493:explains it all 1468: 1466:You're a sysop! 1443: 1072: 1041: 1014: 993: 978: 946:. However, the 914: 875:. It should be 823: 810: 794: 777: 753: 729: 716: 704: 692: 680: 659: 646: 630: 612: 533: 513: 511:Norse mythology 483:Hebrew alphabet 456: 430:Standard Hebrew 426:Tiberian Hebrew 410: 395: 249: 237: 235:Greek mythology 201: 175: 143: 74:Manual of Style 44: 12: 11: 5: 2883: 2881: 2873: 2872: 2867: 2857: 2856: 2841: 2837: 2836: 2827: 2805: 2793: 2790: 2744: 2740: 2735: 2699: 2696: 2685: 2684: 2675: 2648:grading scheme 2637: 2623: 2621: 2614: 2582: 2579: 2545: 2542: 2525: 2520: 2511: 2508: 2499: 2496: 2469:Sefer haYashar 2460: 2457: 2422: 2416: 2396: 2393: 2392: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2376: 2375: 2364: 2354: 2347: 2343: 2314: 2301: 2294: 2290: 2279: 2278: 2263: 2236: 2233: 2224: 2221: 2205: 2204:Norse spelling 2202: 2201: 2200: 2184: 2181: 2157: 2154: 2135: 2132: 2118: 2112: 2094: 2091: 2089: 2051: 2050: 2047: 2044: 2033: 2032: 2029: 2026: 2009: 2008: 2003: 1998: 1976:other projects 1939: 1936: 1907: 1904: 1891: 1888: 1873: 1870: 1861: 1858: 1849: 1846: 1837: 1834: 1814: 1811: 1762:Thidrek's saga 1758:Nibelungenlied 1722: 1721: 1720: 1708: 1707: 1695: 1694: 1681: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1652:disambiguation 1648: 1638: 1637: 1614: 1601: 1599: 1598: 1576: 1574: 1573: 1542: 1539: 1526: 1523: 1514: 1511: 1509: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1467: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1442: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1345: 1344: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1119: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1071: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1057: 1049: 1040: 1037: 1013: 1012:Shingo, Aomori 1010: 992: 989: 988: 987: 977: 972: 960:Yngling (line) 952:Yngling (clan) 913: 910: 902:Yngling (clan) 897: 896: 868: 867: 822: 819: 809: 806: 793: 790: 776: 770: 769: 768: 752: 749: 735:, you renamed 728: 725: 715: 712: 703: 700: 691: 688: 679: 676: 658: 657:I second that! 655: 645: 642: 629: 624: 611: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 583:Flathead Ocean 539: 538: 532: 529: 527: 525: 524: 512: 509: 507: 455: 452: 437:Israeli Hebrew 409: 406: 394: 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 386: 385: 350: 349: 348: 347: 336: 335: 334: 333: 317: 316: 307: 306: 305: 284: 283: 278: 277: 276: 260: 259: 248: 245: 236: 233: 231: 200: 197: 196: 195: 174: 171: 170: 169: 142: 139: 125: 124: 123: 77: 76: 71: 66: 61: 43: 40: 37: 36: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2882: 2871: 2868: 2866: 2863: 2862: 2860: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2834: 2826: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2810: 2803: 2798: 2791: 2789: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2739: 2736: 2734: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2720: 2714: 2709: 2705: 2697: 2694: 2691: 2688: 2681: 2676: 2673: 2672: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2636: 2634: 2627: 2619: 2615: 2613: 2612: 2609: 2608: 2602:. Thank you. 2601: 2597: 2592: 2588: 2587:recent change 2580: 2578: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2556: 2543: 2541: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2524: 2521: 2519: 2518: 2509: 2507: 2505: 2497: 2495: 2494: 2491: 2486: 2484: 2479: 2476: 2474: 2470: 2466: 2456: 2455: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2420: 2417: 2415: 2414: 2411: 2407: 2404: 2400: 2394: 2391: 2383: 2382:24.61.229.179 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2373: 2372:24.61.229.179 2369: 2365: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2310: 2307:for the next 2306: 2302: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2288: 2285: 2281: 2280: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2269: 2268: 2261: 2257: 2256: 2250: 2246: 2244: 2243:disinterested 2232: 2230: 2222: 2220: 2218: 2212: 2211: 2203: 2198: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2190: 2182: 2180: 2178: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2155: 2153: 2151: 2147: 2142: 2133: 2131: 2129: 2124: 2117: 2113: 2111: 2109: 2105: 2100: 2092: 2090: 2087: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2073: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2048: 2045: 2043: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2030: 2027: 2025: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2018: 2014: 2007: 2004: 2002: 1999: 1996: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1964:public domain 1961: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1948:multi-license 1945: 1937: 1935: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1905: 1903: 1901: 1897: 1889: 1887: 1885: 1880: 1877: 1871: 1869: 1867: 1859: 1857: 1855: 1847: 1845: 1843: 1835: 1833: 1831: 1826: 1824: 1820: 1812: 1810: 1808: 1804: 1802: 1797: 1792: 1787: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1763: 1759: 1753: 1752: 1748: 1746: 1740: 1739: 1735: 1733: 1727: 1726: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1696: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1687: 1679: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1653: 1649: 1646: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1583: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1549: 1545: 1544: 1540: 1538: 1536: 1532: 1524: 1522: 1520: 1512: 1510: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1496: 1494: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1472:administrator 1460: 1456: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1448: 1440: 1431: 1427: 1426: 1424: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1408: 1403: 1402: 1400: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1384: 1379: 1378: 1376: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1360: 1356: 1355: 1353: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1333: 1327: 1322: 1321: 1319: 1314: 1313: 1307: 1302: 1301: 1299: 1294: 1293: 1287: 1283: 1282: 1280: 1276: 1275: 1269: 1264: 1263: 1261: 1256: 1255: 1249: 1245: 1244: 1242: 1237: 1236: 1230: 1226: 1225: 1223: 1219: 1218: 1212: 1208: 1207: 1205: 1201: 1200: 1194: 1190: 1189: 1187: 1183: 1182: 1176: 1172: 1171: 1169: 1164: 1163: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1150: 1146: 1145: 1139: 1135: 1134: 1132: 1128: 1127: 1120: 1117: 1112: 1111: 1109: 1104: 1103: 1097: 1092: 1091: 1089: 1084: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1076: 1069: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1047: 1046: 1043: 1042: 1038: 1036: 1034: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1011: 1009: 1007: 1002: 998: 990: 985: 984:Litefantastic 980: 979: 976: 973: 971: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 945: 941: 937: 933: 929: 925: 922:If we define 920: 919: 911: 909: 907: 903: 894: 890: 886: 882: 878: 874: 870: 869: 865: 861: 857: 853: 849: 845: 841: 837: 833: 832: 831: 829: 820: 818: 816: 807: 805: 803: 799: 791: 789: 787: 782: 775: 771: 767: 762: 761: 760: 758: 750: 748: 746: 742: 738: 734: 726: 724: 722: 713: 711: 709: 702:Naming policy 701: 699: 697: 689: 687: 685: 677: 675: 673: 669: 665: 656: 654: 652: 643: 641: 639: 635: 628: 625: 623: 621: 617: 609: 602: 597: 596: 594: 589: 588:Zork universe 584: 580: 576: 571: 570:Zork universe 567: 563: 562:Zork universe 559: 558:Zork universe 555: 550: 546: 543: 542: 541: 540:In Reply to: 537: 531:Zork Universe 530: 528: 522: 518: 517: 516: 510: 508: 505: 503: 498: 496: 490: 486: 484: 480: 475: 473: 468: 463: 461: 453: 451: 450: 447: 442: 438: 435: 431: 427: 422: 418: 414: 407: 405: 404: 401: 392: 383: 382: 378: 373: 372: 370: 368: 364: 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 346: 343: 342: 341: 340: 339: 332: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 323: 315: 313: 308: 304: 300: 299: 298: 297: 296: 294: 290: 282: 279: 275: 272: 271: 270: 269: 268: 266: 258: 254: 253: 252: 246: 244: 242: 234: 232: 229: 228: 225: 221: 216: 212: 209: 206: 198: 193: 188: 187: 186: 184: 180: 172: 167: 162: 161: 160: 159: 156: 152: 148: 140: 138: 137: 134: 129: 122: 121: 118: 117: 112: 108: 104: 103: 102: 100: 96: 94: 90: 87:or ask me on 86: 82: 75: 72: 70: 67: 65: 62: 60: 57: 56: 55: 53: 49: 41: 34: 30: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 2812: 2808: 2792:WP Phoenicia 2742: 2701: 2686: 2669: 2651: 2639: 2631: 2620:was accepted 2603: 2584: 2553:Following a 2547: 2527: 2513: 2501: 2487: 2480: 2477: 2462: 2424: 2408: 2405: 2401: 2398: 2389: 2367: 2361: 2357: 2350: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2324: 2320: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2283: 2266: 2265: 2264:(Better yet 2259: 2258:— I can use 2254: 2252: 2248: 2242: 2240: 2238: 2226: 2213: 2208: 2207: 2186: 2159: 2137: 2120: 2114:Doubling in 2096: 2088: 2070: 2066: 2058: 2054: 2052: 2041: 2035: 2034: 2023: 2012: 2010: 1987: 1975: 1967: 1962:or into the 1955: 1941: 1928:CheeseDreams 1909: 1893: 1881: 1878: 1875: 1863: 1851: 1839: 1827: 1816: 1805: 1795: 1790: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1767: 1761: 1757: 1754: 1750: 1749: 1744: 1741: 1737: 1736: 1731: 1728: 1724: 1723: 1683: 1600: 1575: 1528: 1516: 1508: 1492: 1469: 1444: 1073: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1015: 1000: 994: 954:. The names 947: 943: 939: 935: 927: 923: 921: 916: 915: 898: 851: 847: 843: 839: 835: 824: 815:Slowking Man 811: 795: 778: 754: 730: 717: 705: 693: 681: 663: 660: 647: 631: 620:Michael Snow 618:? Thanks. -- 613: 575:Queen Alexis 548: 544: 534: 526: 514: 506: 499: 491: 487: 476: 466: 464: 457: 433: 411: 396: 379: 366: 362: 359: 351: 344: 337: 330: 321: 318: 309: 301: 288: 285: 280: 273: 264: 261: 255: 250: 238: 230: 207: 202: 176: 144: 130: 126: 116: 113: 97: 89:my talk page 85:village pump 78: 45: 32: 26: 2724:Iryna Harpy 2640:Start-Class 2490:The Editrix 2431:linguistics 2429:scheme for 2328:does depend 2311:by placing 2241:interested 2093:Style guide 1848:Style guide 1775:no evidence 1680:Norse sagas 1659:de:Gangleri 1657:. See also 1513:Burgundians 1284:Probably.-- 1086:department. 932:Norse clans 741:Fýris Wolds 737:Fyris Wolds 733:Hrólf Kraki 690:Time travel 363:Persecution 293:m:wikifaith 2859:Categories 2843:~ Elias Z. 2819:~ Elias Z. 2763:topic bans 2504:Talk:Caron 2451:Psychonaut 2319:into it — 2309:three days 1980:WikiTravel 1978:, such as 1796:Ættartolur 1624:. Regards 1609:regarding 1548:Norse saga 1246:I agree.-- 545:Delete all 93:Wikipedian 81:help pages 2847:talkallam 2832:Let's go! 2823:talkallam 2759:site bans 2671:help desk 2644:talk page 2305:EDIT FREE 2245:bystander 2099:User:jguk 2072:talk page 1942:Hi, I've 1803:article. 1769:There is 1645:MediaWiki 1480:Main Page 1114:think).-- 808:Redirects 802:Lucky 6.9 792:Thank you 672:Lucky 6.9 638:Gilgamesh 601:Brian0918 549:Merge all 446:Gilgamesh 400:Gilgamesh 393:Mediation 322:everybody 224:Gilgamesh 215:Jerusalem 211:Jerusalem 205:Jerusalem 151:Decumanus 2704:WP:CIVIL 2690:LukeSurl 2531:FinnWiki 2406:Cheerio 2358:at least 2336:singular 2317:template 2229:Maurreen 2197:Maurreen 2189:Maurreen 2108:Maurreen 2057:" with " 2042:Option 2 2024:Option 1 1984:top 1000 1968:CC-by-sa 1960:Licenses 1956:CC-by-sa 1884:Maurreen 1866:Maurreen 1854:Maurreen 1830:adamsan 1700:Wulfings 1663:Gangleri 1655:Gangleri 1626:Gangleri 1587:Gangleri 1562:Gangleri 1535:Maurreen 1488:Cecropia 1316:project? 944:ynglings 940:ynglings 889:Scylfing 883:. Edit: 881:Scylfing 858:)" and " 848:Geatland 840:Gautland 721:Acsenray 708:→Raul654 696:Bishonen 684:Bishonen 610:Substubs 579:Aggthora 371:-Jallan 42:Welcome! 2606:MBisanz 2589:to the 2510:Melqart 2334:or the 2081:comment 2077:Ram-Man 1988:minimum 1771:support 1745:Beowulf 1266:come.-- 912:Yngling 885:Yngling 877:Yngling 864:Eadgils 786:Rossami 644:B-Movie 381:vertigo 166:EuroTom 48:welcome 46:Hello, 2749:. The 2708:WP:NPA 2600:WP:RFA 2568:RL0919 2332:plural 2272:Frank 2217:Wiglaf 2177:(talk) 2174:kmccoy 2141:WP:FAC 2128:WP:FAC 1924:WP:VFD 1896:Arnhem 1842:Wiglaf 1813:WP:MOS 1807:Jallan 1801:Heruli 1717:Wiglaf 1713:Heruls 1693:Odin). 1686:Wiglaf 1519:Wetman 1455:WP:RFA 1423:Jallan 1399:Jallan 1375:Jallan 1352:Jallan 1341:Jallan 1318:Jallan 1298:Jallan 1279:Jallan 1260:Jallan 1241:Jallan 1222:Jallan 1204:Jallan 1186:Jallan 1168:Jallan 1149:Jallan 1131:Jallan 1108:Jallan 1088:Jallan 1075:Jallan 968:Wiglaf 918:Norse. 906:Wiglaf 893:Wiglaf 852:Gautar 836:Gautar 828:Wiglaf 766:Wiglaf 757:Wiglaf 745:Wiglaf 651:Mike H 593:Jallan 472:niqqud 312:jallan 241:Wetman 192:jallan 183:Wetman 179:Moloch 173:Moloch 133:jallan 115:Kenney 99:Angela 2523:Víkar 2346:vote. 2315:Inuse 2085:talk) 1922:from 1779:facts 1430:AAAAA 1407:AAAAA 1383:AAAAA 1359:AAAAA 1337:AAAAA 1326:AAAAA 1306:AAAAA 1286:AAAAA 1268:AAAAA 1248:AAAAA 1229:AAAAA 1211:AAAAA 1193:AAAAA 1175:AAAAA 1156:AAAAA 1138:AAAAA 1116:AAAAA 1096:AAAAA 1061:AAAAA 1052:Alexa 930:(see 860:Geats 856:Geats 844:Geats 781:voted 739:into 727:Links 289:could 2783:talk 2728:talk 2719:here 2713:here 2706:and 2572:talk 2535:talk 2475:." 2425:The 2399:Hi! 2313:The 2267:Beer 2260:your 2223:Ciao 2063:GFDL 1972:GFDL 1918:and 1823:jguk 1791:know 1732:need 1702:and 1556:and 1001:very 924:clan 891:?.-- 846:and 838:and 772:re: 636:. - 568:and 566:Zork 554:Zork 502:Dovi 495:Dovi 467:must 434:only 155:Talk 147:Dido 141:Dido 111:John 2743:Hi, 2485:. 2293:is. 2249:Fg2 1335:I, 1033:Fg2 1006:TPK 962:or 948:ätt 928:ätt 904:.-- 879:or 866:)". 678:VfD 581:or 577:or 547:or 377:Ste 2861:: 2849:) 2825:) 2785:) 2761:, 2730:) 2574:) 2537:) 2410:Io 2106:. 2083:| 2036:OR 1914:, 1669:| 1667:Th 1665:| 1632:| 1630:Th 1628:| 1595:Th 1593:| 1589:| 1570:Th 1568:| 1564:| 1490:| 958:, 813:-- 664:do 521:Io 208:in 153:| 95:! 2845:( 2821:( 2781:( 2726:( 2683:. 2674:. 2570:( 2533:( 2445:→ 2437:→ 2270:) 2079:( 1671:T 1634:T 1591:T 1566:T 1495:® 982:- 375:-

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index