193:, since he's commenting on the interests that Brown shares with him, as evidenced by the themes Brown used in the book. Finding ways to incorporate material into relevant sections with cohesive themes is sometimes tricky, but if you feel that it doesn't fit with the other material in that section, one possible solution I would suggest would be to change the heading slightly to "Literary criticism and analysis". What do you think?
23:
60:
Just a friendly reminder that when you post messages on discussion pages, you need to sign your messages, otherwise it gets very confusing for other editors and no one knows who wrote what. All you have to do is type four tildes (or click the signature button, as mentioned above) at the end of your
165:
Good tips. Sorry for my sloppy editing. I was admittedly tired and secretly hoping a smarter official at Wiki would make it look better. Agree with most everything you said. Only dispute: Umberto Eco's comment is not a criticism, it's an extemporaneous thought (Dan Brown was a character in his
306:
Since this isn't a social networking site like
Facebook, the only way to "friend" someone is to talk to them by leaving messages on their talk page, or by emailing them (which you can only do if they have that function enabled, which will be indicated by the "E-mail this user" link in the lefthand
268:- Don't be daunted by these last two lists; you can just learn the policies and guidelines gradually, bit by bit like I did; I just put these here in case you ever feel ambitious and want to dive right in. Personally, I think the three most important sections there are for newbies to learn are the
280:
A lot of the other stuff I learned was just a matter of looking at articles, and seeing how others had done. For example, when I wanted to learn how to format text in bold or italics, I'd find some bold or italics in an article, click on "edit", and see how what markup was used for those effects
145:
Thanks for adding those additional reviews to the article. Hopefully it looks more balanced now. If you have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of
44:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
188:
can be found by doing a search for either "The Da Vinci Code" or "Dan Brown". Yes, I agree it's not a criticism, but a comment by a writer like Eco would certainly seem to be a valuable addition to the article. While not criticism, it does seem
115:
Salman
Rushdie and Umberto Eco are prominent writers, and therefore, comments that they make in interviews or in lectures is perfectly valid for inclusion. They do not have to be in the form of "reviews". The topic of that section is
107:
opening tag, which is used when a source is cited multiple times in an article. That source was used for other material in the article, and by removing the entire cite, you cause cite errors to occur, as seen with Cite #19
558:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
123:
Salon.com is a legitimate publication. You offered no rationale for the removal of the material sourced to that publication's story. If you cannot offer such a rationale, please do not remove such material.
92:
Although link rot is a genuine problem, removal of information, solely because the link has gone dead, is not a valid solution to the problem. More on this is explained at
492:
Good to know. Thanks for the head's up. I sometimes need those extra 4 characters on the edit comments (seriously), so that will come in handy at some point.
247:
137:
A minor point, but references should be placed right after the supported material, or right after the punctuation that comes at the end of it.
237:
583:
40:
523:
185:
130:
piece was not from the author of it, it was from a comment left by a user in the
Comments section. This is not a valid source, as per
426:
41:
399:
242:
579:
352:
You mean like projects? Well, I'm not an expert in that area, but I can tell you that I'm a part of a couple of projects, like
353:
265:
281:(three apostrophes on each side of the formatted text for bold, two for italics), so I recommend doing this when applicable.
273:
269:
260:
232:
570:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
575:
418:
384:
414:
361:
166:
book?) It's a random joke, not criticism. Also, I couldn't find the actual quote used in the source cited.
519:
422:
31:
527:
284:
And if you want to get to know other
Wikipedians and interact with them in person, you can always come to
571:
252:
27:
369:
321:
296:
211:
155:
147:
104:
93:
395:
547:
538:
567:
551:
429:
for more information on signatures and talk pages. If you have any other questions, please ask on
131:
493:
457:
331:
167:
50:
563:
555:
138:
365:
317:
292:
207:
151:
566:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
559:
470:
You only really need to sign edits on talk pages and
Knowledge (XXG) namespace pages. --
391:
103:
Even when you do remove a reference for valid reasons, please note if it is employing the
206:
that began that section, which you correctly reverted. Cool collaborating with you! :-)
479:
442:
430:
66:
413:
Hey
Jasonnewyork! I just wanted to point out that you don't have to sign (~~~~) your
61:
message and it will automatically sign your username and the date/time. Thank you. –
46:
38:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
313:
472:
435:
62:
587:
531:
501:
487:
465:
450:
403:
373:
339:
325:
300:
215:
175:
159:
70:
54:
554:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Knowledge (XXG)
456:
Oh, didn't know that. I just always throw it in there just to be sure.
285:
291:
If you every have any other questions or need help, just ask! :-)
288:
meetings. I sometimes go to them myself, since I live in Jersey.
76:
Ahhh, I thought it auto signed it. Will sign in future. Thanks.
35:
357:
30:
and
Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should
255:- This is to ask questions about how to edit Knowledge (XXG).
356:. When tried to replace "Comics" with "Philosphy", I found
312:
And after doing so looking around, I found that there's a
364:, which includes a Directory. Let me know if that helps.
26:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
203:
109:
85:
360:
of search results, and on that page I saw a link for
546:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
204:the balanced introductory summary on the reviews
228:I'd be happy to help. Here are some resources:
385:Talk:Criticism of atheism#Concepts of Atheism
330:Awesome, thanks! I'll check it out. Cheers.
8:
417:. You do not have to sign any edits in the
316:, so maybe you can try checking them out.
307:sidebar on their user page and talk page).
390:Ive replied on the talk page. Regards, -
276:sections of the List of policies page.
139:Spaces do not go in front of citations
88:, a number of points need to be made:
7:
427:Knowledge (XXG):Talk page guidelines
354:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Comics
14:
572:review the candidates' statements
39:
21:
100:material, with the updated url.
86:your edits to The Da Vinci Code
578:. For the Election committee,
548:Arbitration Committee election
539:ArbCom elections are now open!
314:Wikimedia District of Columbia
202:Sorry I neglected to maintain
1:
588:16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
532:06:59, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
126:The comment sourced to that
574:and submit your choices on
502:01:32, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
488:01:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
466:01:27, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
451:01:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
362:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject
248:New contributors' help page
603:
580:MediaWiki message delivery
423:Knowledge (XXG):Signatures
216:18:44, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
176:16:12, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
160:20:57, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
404:07:53, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
71:18:12, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
55:19:05, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
497:
461:
374:19:04, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
340:17:42, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
335:
326:16:43, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
301:06:36, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
238:Avoiding Common Mistakes
171:
94:Knowledge (XXG):Link rot
184:The comment by Eco in
552:Arbitration Committee
84:Hi, Jason. Regarding
556:arbitration process
243:Starting an article
568:arbitration policy
286:Wikimedia New York
266:List of guidelines
224:Learning the Ropes
522:comment added by
96:. I restored the
80:The Da Vinci Code
17:Your recent edits
594:
534:
484:
483:
477:
476:
447:
446:
440:
439:
261:List of policies
233:Editing Tutorial
120:. Not "reviews".
43:
25:
24:
602:
601:
597:
596:
595:
593:
592:
591:
576:the voting page
542:
517:
514:
481:
480:
474:
473:
444:
443:
437:
436:
421:. You can read
411:
388:
226:
82:
34:by typing four
32:sign your posts
22:
19:
12:
11:
5:
600:
598:
545:
541:
536:
513:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
433:, thanks. --
419:main namespace
415:edit summaries
410:
409:Edit summaries
407:
387:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
345:
344:
343:
342:
309:
308:
278:
277:
263:
257:
256:
250:
245:
240:
235:
225:
222:
221:
220:
219:
218:
197:
196:
195:
194:
186:this interview
179:
178:
150:. Thanks. :-)
143:
142:
135:
124:
121:
113:
101:
81:
78:
74:
73:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
599:
590:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
540:
537:
535:
533:
529:
525:
521:
511:
503:
499:
495:
491:
490:
489:
486:
485:
478:
469:
468:
467:
463:
459:
455:
454:
453:
452:
449:
448:
441:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
408:
406:
405:
401:
397:
393:
386:
383:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
341:
337:
333:
329:
328:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
310:
305:
304:
303:
302:
298:
294:
289:
287:
282:
275:
271:
267:
264:
262:
259:
258:
254:
251:
249:
246:
244:
241:
239:
236:
234:
231:
230:
229:
223:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
200:
199:
198:
192:
187:
183:
182:
181:
180:
177:
173:
169:
164:
163:
162:
161:
157:
153:
149:
140:
136:
133:
129:
125:
122:
119:
114:
111:
106:
102:
99:
95:
91:
90:
89:
87:
79:
77:
72:
68:
64:
59:
58:
57:
56:
52:
48:
42:
37:
33:
29:
16:
543:
524:41.77.137.96
518:— Preceding
516:keep it up
515:
494:Jasonnewyork
471:
458:Jasonnewyork
434:
431:my talk page
412:
389:
332:Jasonnewyork
290:
283:
279:
227:
190:
168:Jasonnewyork
148:my talk page
144:
127:
117:
97:
83:
75:
20:
366:Nightscream
318:Nightscream
293:Nightscream
208:Nightscream
152:Nightscream
564:topic bans
392:Stevertigo
191:analytical
98:New Yorker
28:talk pages
560:site bans
512:good work
358:this page
253:Help Desk
118:Criticism
520:unsigned
132:WP:USERG
128:Guardian
105:ref name
274:Conduct
270:Content
47:SineBot
550:. The
482:(Talk)
445:(Talk)
36:tildes
584:talk
528:talk
498:talk
475:Luke
462:talk
438:Luke
425:and
370:talk
336:talk
322:talk
297:talk
272:and
212:talk
172:talk
156:talk
110:here
67:talk
63:BMRR
51:talk
544:Hi,
586:)
562:,
530:)
500:)
464:)
402:)
398:|
372:)
338:)
324:)
299:)
214:)
174:)
158:)
69:)
53:)
45:--
582:(
526:(
496:(
460:(
400:c
396:t
394:(
368:(
334:(
320:(
295:(
210:(
170:(
154:(
141:.
134:.
112:.
65:(
49:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
