158:
contribution to a section which undid the balance of the two views being presented there. The addition is an opinion of one of the two sides being discussed to which both views already had equal say, and the fair and sympathetic views of both sides is now being undermined. The reason for removing the contribution Cunado added was stated in the "summary of changes", yet Cunado chose to ignore the concern and restore, again and again. What's one to do, for it seems all the contributor need to do is restore thrice and he can ignore the stated concerns? It's not my wish to be involved in such things, yet I feel obligated as a contributor to the article to defend it when I see fit. How can this be done when 3rr can be levied by a contributor who had at the article first, and can then restore three times to have his way? Thank you in advance.
477:
shifted the Sunni hadith reference located in the Sunni hadith book Sahih al-Tirmidhi from the Shia section on the page, to the Sunni section; after all why would someone use a Sunni refernce to explain Shia beliefs? It makes no logical sense to have a Sunni reference under the Shia heading. I am baffled at how easily you undid all my long research. I want wikipedia to keep some integrity! So once again why did you undue my edits?
953:
366:
536:, but just archived it. As an administrator of the English Knowledge, this is a request to add your username in some format into your signature. I don't care if you have "Baha'i Under the Covenant" in it or not, as I do not know enough about the Baha'i faith to understand why it is an issue. It is a general guideline that your signature have your username in it. Please put "Jeff" in your signature in some form.â
723:
133:
630:
508:
that "While not an absolute requirement, it is common practice for a signature to resemble to some degree the username it represents." I think it would ameliorate the issues a bit if you were to add your username into your signature once more, but you could still retain the message. A possible format
585:
twice now. I can't quite understand your edit summary. I've re-read the source a few times, as you suggested, and it clearly supports the material in our article. Could you please stop deleting cited and relevant info and explain on the article talk page what your objections are? Have you read the
476:
I was just wondering why you have undone my edit to the page referring to Imam Mahdi (Peace be on him). Knowledge wanted more references and I provided many references. Considering this page has information from practically only one source, I provided many sources to provide a balnced view. I also
1058:
It hasn't by you. It's not the content that the point, it's the publisher, because self-published works have no reliable source of fact-checking and thus it's out. In wikipedia, users don't get to decide what is truth, but what is verifiable, and they way to decide if it's veriable if someone
869:
There were spelling corrections and content change, and it was two hours after you made the comment. I'm not trying to make a big case about that change in particular, but your style of editing your comments a dozen times over several hours does make it hard to follow and it's been that way for a
157:
William, in the interest of avoiding problems in the future, I was hoping you could offer some advice for me should similiar situations in the future arise. You suggested to "make an effort to discuss your changes". The edits which led to these four reverts involved me removing what I felt was a
840:
Well, there are two fallacies to your concern with this. 1)Correcting spelling mistakes is not a redaction of a comment. 2)No one had yet replied to the comment that I was correcting the spelling of. So, this quote from the policy page, while completely relevant in it's own right, is not at all
844:. If you were there long enough to undo my spelling correction, couldn't you have taken a moment to contribute to the discussion? Instead of wasting your time on this sort of non-productive pettiness, why don't you respond to the direct questions being posed to your concerns?
802:
It is best to avoid changing your own comments. Other users may have already quoted you with a diff (see above) or have otherwise responded to your statement. Therefore, use "Show preview" and think about how your amended statement may look to others before you save it.
444:
you made was almost 6 hours after your first comment. I'm sure you can see why that becomes a problem for people following. It is also a lot easier to follow the history if you make a comment in a single edit. Try using preview and re-reading before saving.
734:
prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
167:
Really, you need to step back a bit: having two sides prepared to revert indefinitely won't help the article. The first thing to do is discuss this on the articles talk page; if that doesn't help, try to find others interested (page
1021:
Can you tell me what the difference is between those two sites? "Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published". Both self-published, both written about Mason Remey, both not written by Mason Remey. Regards, --
38:
Thank you for your kind note on my talk page today. This medium does indeed present many difficulties in effective communication. It's a written medium, but treated often as a spoken one. We're all new at it and learning.
825:
A placeholder is a phrase such as "". This will ensure that your fellow editors' irritated responses still make sense. In turn, they may then wish to replace their reply with something like, ""
645:
prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for
672:
806:
Altering a comment after it has been replied to robs the reply of its original context. It can also be confusing. Before you change, consider taking one of the following steps:
698:
think that data has to come off. Nobody's got any business accessing that. What were they thinking setting it up so that you can have that kind of access without a password?
126:
1041:
then either are valid. If not then the content does not warrant inclusions. Why are you asking me here when it' been asked and answered three times on the discussion page?
248:
article is hardly a blog post, it is a well-sourced academic paper with 50 footnotes that happens to be hosted on blogspot.com and the content is formatted in blog form.
554:
It is currently impossible to click on your username to reach your user or user talk pages. Please make sure you have it set so that there is a link to either place.â
53:
Sorry I wasn't clear that the user had deleted the entire contents of the article :) That's what the RfC was suppossed to be about, the existance of the article :)
287:
That was not nice. Now I have re-add it. If you have a problem with it state it. Otherwise fix up the grammar and other minor problems you may have with it.
143:. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the
653:. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --
610:
When the points regarding self-publication are completely on-point, and you keep on not accepting them, what more is there to add. Regards, --
392:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may
151:
209:
Are much appreciated. Feel free to inform me when you're being ganged up against. My email settings are also turned on btw :)
1007:
973:
102:
274:
257:
70:
752:
509:
you could use is "Jeff " with one item linking to your userpage and the other to your user talk, or your contributions.â
491:
98:
985:
736:
731:
650:
642:
393:
140:
586:
article itself, and if so, do you feel that the passage does not accurately represent it? Please elaborate a bit at
17:
1003:
965:
960:
742:
638:
449:
382:
373:
176:
148:
810:
Contact the person(s) who replied (through their talk page) and ask if it is okay to delete or change your text.
747:. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
760:
703:
684:
590:. I've taken the liberty of quoting the relevant portion of the source there. Also, please be aware of the
288:
1042:
890:
845:
82:
505:
879:
787:
748:
587:
330:
318:
314:
218:
By the way, on your user page, your have a section "Backround". I think you mean "Background". :)
78:
1064:
1027:
756:
727:
699:
680:
658:
646:
615:
486:
461:
351:
196:
114:
106:
74:
40:
561:
543:
516:
401:
270:
253:
23:
694:
This got taken down from WP:AN and I was directed to WP:Oversight. I'm following up there. I
69:
As I see that you have dealt with some original research issues on ], can you take a look at
1068:
1053:
1031:
1011:
991:
901:
884:
856:
792:
775:
764:
707:
688:
662:
619:
600:
567:
549:
522:
494:
466:
430:
426:
404:
354:
291:
277:
260:
240:
is a collection of well-sourced and documented essays on various topics within the scope of
222:
213:
199:
179:
162:
159:
117:
87:
59:
43:
452:
is about user names, but it would not be a long stretch to apply it to changed signatures.
952:
365:
54:
637:
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be
504:
Add "Jeff" or some other form of your username to your signature, please. It does say in
871:
779:
582:
326:
722:
629:
1060:
1038:
1037:
If information from either could pass the bar for inclusion based on the 5 points of
1023:
969:
934:
654:
611:
596:
591:
533:
453:
418:
411:
388:
347:
340:
322:
219:
210:
169:
981:
977:
555:
537:
510:
266:
249:
173:
101:
and removed most of the non-BUPC stuff. I also redirected
Messianic prophecies to
448:
Also, please change your signature back to something that is less controversial.
927:
422:
132:
813:
Use strike-through or a place-holder to show the comment has been altered.
831:
do not apply strike-through to other editors' comments without permission.
241:
841:
relevant to the undo you just enacted on my spelling corrections edit
532:
I am posting this, again, as you did not respond to it here or at
346:
You're frustrated, but tone it down. You're both skating close to
245:
237:
233:
930:
236:
article is hardly a blog in the conventional sense of the word.
951:
628:
364:
131:
333:.) And repeatedly referring to your own edits as "honest"
999:
924:
842:
578:
441:
337:
334:
311:
308:
305:
302:
193:
144:
139:
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the
870:
long time. Try using the preview function more often.
105:. Although I will be doing some more documentation on
679:
security problem that needs your earliest attention.
124:
984:. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may
440:I've noticed that you re-edit the talk page a lot.
301:Be advised: repeatedly refering to others' edits
964:from editing for a short time in accordance with
673:Talk:BahĂĄ'Ăs Under the Provisions of the Covenant
940:made on February 26 2009 to Leland Jensen": -->
65:original research on Messianic related articles
649:, even if they do not technically violate the
1059:else has decided to publish it. Regards, --
755:. You know well enough to stay off the 3RR.
8:
127:BahĂĄ'Ăs Under the Provisions of the Covenant
244:. The "blog post" that I linked to on the
726:You currently appear to be engaged in an
297:Warning: Be Civil and Assume Good Faith
641:from editing Knowledge. Note that the
594:, which serves to limit edit-warring.
103:Messianic prophecies (disambiguation)
7:
751:among editors. If necessary, pursue
125:User notice: temporary 3RR block on
816:Strike-through is typed <s: -->
99:Messianic prophecies (views: BUPC)
31:
232:The blog that I linked to on the
917:User notice: temporary 3RR block
721:
97:Jeff, I have set up the article
265:I responded on my TALK page. --
405:14:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
355:21:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
24:User talk:Jeffmichaud/Archive2
1:
1012:23:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
974:discuss controversial changes
902:07:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
885:05:27, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
857:05:13, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
793:01:16, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
765:02:44, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
663:03:43, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
620:04:37, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
568:05:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
550:23:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
523:08:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
396:by adding the text {{unblock|
377:from editing for a period of
223:18:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
88:22:55, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
71:Messianic Religious Practices
60:09:15, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
972:. Please be more careful to
495:15:41, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
467:22:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
214:17:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
44:03:21, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
980:rather than engaging in an
966:Knowledge's blocking policy
708:00:57, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
689:21:30, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
601:23:23, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
431:19:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
383:Knowledge's blocking policy
292:17:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
200:19:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
1087:
417:please see my comments at
77:. Thanks for your help. --
18:User talk:General Disarray
1069:13:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
1054:04:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
1032:20:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
450:Knowledge:Username policy
278:04:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
261:20:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
180:09:09, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
163:07:25, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
152:11:46, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
118:05:44, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
93:Messianic prophecies BUPC
283:Why did you undo my edit
109:it is largely complete.
472:Mahdi (Peace be on him)
956:
634:
485:You have a new email.
369:
136:
1017:CMR.com & CMR.net
955:
632:
368:
135:
1004:William M. Connolley
998:The duration of the
923:Regarding reversions
817:like this</s: -->
506:Knowledge:Signatures
177:William M. Connolley
149:William M. Connolley
994:|Your reason here}}
988:by adding the text
739:. If you continue,
588:Talk:Hoxsey Therapy
579:well-cited material
577:Hi. You've removed
381:in accordance with
329:w/o discussion are
978:dispute resolution
968:for violating the
957:
753:dispute resolution
635:
370:
228:Your recent revert
172:) and after that,
137:
107:Messianic prophecy
84:ÂŁâŹĂ„V⏠m⏠Ä mâŹÂ§Â§Ă„gâŹ
75:Messianic prophecy
1051:
986:contest the block
970:three-revert rule
899:
854:
770:Editing talk page
737:three-revert rule
732:three-revert rule
651:three-revert rule
643:three-revert rule
592:three-revert rule
394:contest the block
341:assume good faith
238:Reb Chaim HaQoton
141:three-revert rule
85:
22:(Redirected from
1078:
1049:
1043:
995:
948:
947:
943:
897:
891:
882:
876:
852:
846:
790:
784:
730:. Note that the
725:
564:
558:
546:
540:
519:
513:
489:
464:
458:
398:your reason here
387:Edit warring on
189:"Drainage ditch"
83:
57:
27:
1086:
1085:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1050:
1045:
1019:
1014:
997:
989:
949:
945:
941:
939:
938:
919:
898:
893:
880:
872:
853:
848:
800:
788:
780:
772:
719:
670:
627:
608:
575:
562:
556:
544:
538:
530:
517:
511:
502:
487:
483:
474:
462:
454:
438:
415:
407:
362:
327:Major revisions
299:
289:124.170.187.147
285:
230:
207:
191:
130:
95:
67:
55:
51:
36:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1084:
1082:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1044:
1018:
1015:
958:You have been
950:
937:
921:
920:
918:
915:
913:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
892:
862:
861:
860:
859:
847:
835:
834:
833:
832:
826:
823:
811:
799:
796:
771:
768:
718:
715:
713:
711:
710:
669:
666:
626:
623:
607:
604:
583:Hoxsey Therapy
574:
571:
529:
526:
501:
498:
482:
479:
473:
470:
437:
434:
414:
408:
371:You have been
363:
361:
360:September 2007
358:
339:is counter to
298:
295:
284:
281:
229:
226:
206:
203:
190:
187:
186:
185:
184:
183:
129:
123:
122:
121:
94:
91:
66:
63:
50:
47:
35:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1083:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1052:
1048:
1040:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1016:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1002:is 24 hours.
1001:
993:
987:
983:
979:
975:
971:
967:
963:
962:
954:
944:
936:
935:Leland Jensen
932:
929:
925:
922:
916:
914:
903:
900:
896:
888:
887:
886:
883:
877:
875:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
858:
855:
851:
843:
839:
838:
837:
836:
830:
827:
824:
821:
815:
814:
812:
809:
808:
807:
804:
797:
795:
794:
791:
785:
783:
777:
769:
767:
766:
762:
758:
757:MARussellPESE
754:
750:
746:
744:
738:
733:
729:
724:
716:
714:
709:
705:
701:
700:MARussellPESE
697:
693:
692:
691:
690:
686:
682:
681:MARussellPESE
678:
675:. You have a
674:
668:Check out ...
667:
665:
664:
660:
656:
652:
648:
644:
640:
631:
624:
622:
621:
617:
613:
605:
603:
602:
599:
598:
593:
589:
584:
580:
572:
570:
569:
565:
559:
552:
551:
547:
541:
535:
527:
525:
524:
520:
514:
507:
499:
497:
496:
493:
490:
480:
478:
471:
469:
468:
465:
459:
457:
451:
446:
443:
435:
433:
432:
428:
424:
420:
419:Talk:Bostanai
413:
412:Talk:Bostanai
409:
406:
403:
399:
395:
391:
390:
389:Leland Jensen
384:
380:
376:
375:
367:
359:
357:
356:
353:
352:MARussellPESE
349:
344:
342:
338:
335:
332:
331:not Vandalism
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
309:
306:
303:
296:
294:
293:
290:
282:
280:
279:
276:
272:
268:
263:
262:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
227:
225:
224:
221:
216:
215:
212:
205:Your comments
204:
202:
201:
198:
197:MARussellPESE
195:
188:
181:
178:
175:
171:
166:
165:
164:
161:
156:
155:
154:
153:
150:
147:is 24 hours.
146:
142:
134:
128:
120:
119:
116:
115:RickReinckens
112:
111:
110:
108:
104:
100:
92:
90:
89:
86:
80:
76:
72:
64:
62:
61:
58:
48:
46:
45:
42:
41:MARussellPESE
33:
25:
19:
1046:
1020:
959:
912:
894:
873:
849:
828:
819:
818:and ends up
805:
801:
798:Own comments
781:
773:
745:from editing
740:
720:
717:Edit Warring
712:
695:
676:
671:
647:edit warring
636:
609:
595:
576:
553:
531:
528:Signature, 2
503:
484:
475:
455:
447:
439:
421:. thanks.
416:
397:
386:
378:
372:
345:
300:
286:
264:
231:
217:
208:
192:
138:
113:
96:
68:
52:
49:Jahbulon RFC
37:
928:February 26
741:you may be
625:3RR warning
319:they aren't
889:Oky-doky.
400:}} below.
820:like this
776:WP:REDACT
749:consensus
500:Signature
442:this edit
336:, &
315:vandalism
310:, &
34:Thank you
1061:Jeff3000
1047:Disarray
1024:Jeff3000
982:edit war
976:or seek
926:made on
895:Disarray
850:Disarray
728:edit war
655:Jeff3000
612:Jeff3000
606:Response
597:MastCell
379:24 hours
275:Contribs
258:Contribs
220:Wjhonson
211:Wjhonson
56:Seraphim
996:below.
992:unblock
961:blocked
743:blocked
677:serious
639:blocked
633:Warning
557:Ryƫlóng
539:Ryƫlóng
512:Ryƫlóng
436:request
374:blocked
323:uncivil
317:, when
242:Judaism
79:Eliezer
1039:WP:SPS
874:Cuñado
829:Please
782:Cuñado
696:really
573:Hoxsey
534:WP:ANI
488:Rudget
456:Cuñado
423:Jon513
170:WP:RFC
1000:block
581:from
481:Email
402:Shell
321:, is
246:David
234:David
174:WP:DR
145:block
16:<
1065:talk
1028:talk
1008:talk
942:edit
931:2009
881:Talk
878:⌠-
789:Talk
786:⌠-
774:Per
761:talk
704:talk
685:talk
659:talk
616:talk
463:Talk
460:⌠-
427:talk
410:see
385:for
271:Talk
267:ŚšŚ"Ś§
254:Talk
250:ŚšŚ"Ś§
160:Jeff
73:and
933:to
348:3RR
325:. (
313:as
307:,
304:,
194:LOL
1067:)
1030:)
1010:)
990:{{
778:,
763:)
706:)
687:)
661:)
618:)
566:)
563:ç«éŸ
548:)
545:ç«éŸ
521:)
518:ç«éŸ
429:)
350:.
343:.
273:|
269:|
256:|
252:|
81:|
1063:(
1026:(
1006:(
946:]
822:.
759:(
702:(
683:(
657:(
614:(
560:(
542:(
515:(
492:.
425:(
182:.
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
