User talk:Jeraxmoira - Knowledge (XXG)

972: 2202: 1073: 3169: 2860:

egregious content like a copyright violation or BLP-violating content. I'm not sure how many articles you have created, but I'm sure you can empathize, especially with brand new editors who are just learning how to edit. If you have just offered a review of their draft, you might consider allowing them time to respond to your review of what they have written. Again, if there is unacceptable content, it should be tagged immediately. Thank you.

22: 4748:

over that. Another page had been part of a previous merge and I believe we need to retain it for attribution purposes. Also, the page creator has to be a confirmed sockpuppet, not just an editor listed on an open SPI report and has to be the sole or primary contributor to an article. Several articles you tagged had substantial contributions from several other editors so these articles weren't eligible for CSD G5. Please review

3452: 166: 3362: 3228: 4110: 3994: 4218: 4392: 2355: 2433: 1903: 3393: 3623: 4923: 5092: 4794: 5004: 2924: 2573: 2531: 1517: 693: 605: 501: 393: 355: 1804: 3323:, though the consensus on this has not weight here. If you have sources from other time periods pertaining to other events, please feel free to move it mainspace after adding them. I just got my visual/source editor fixed through the Teahouse IRC, so I couldn't leave you a personal note earlier regarding this. Cheers 4747:

I untagged a few of the pages you tagged for CSD G5 speedy deletion. Please examine each page before you tag it for deletion because not all of these articles, redirects and drafts met the G5 criteria. One article was in the middle of an article merger and I don't think speedy deletion takes priority

2702:

I will try to find better sources, but as you can see from the archived links I’ve used elsewhere in the article, many old articles have since become dead links and may not be publicly accessible via web search engines, though that doesn’t mean TamilNet was just making up stuffs when they were openly

1720:

i went through it and realized some angles of writing could easily look that way. I made changes. One was I wrote that subject when he was president of a co.psny grew the income exponentially... That was probably a mistake. I remove for. Rephrased it. I found another part too when I mention movies he

3742:

In this case, a before search was not needed as I did not nominate it for deletion. I'm sorry, but it is not the responsibility of NPRs to find sources while patrolling new articles, as this would take up a lot of time for what I believe is an unimportant/ low-interest topic. Regarding your deletion

3140:

This is my second barnstar given and I'll be honest, I got riled up at the AfD discussion at times. We certainly have opposed viewpoints, but whatever the outcome, this has been both an interesting and extensive discussion that has brought me closer to policies, guidelines, essays, even WikiProjects

3719:

I do see your point here, but I'd personally say travel guide listings are in fact RS for a place that is primarily known for it's tourism. Also, while you do point out that the policies as currently written do not explicitly ask you to perform a BEFORE search, I do think performing a BEFORE search

3291:

Hi Jeraxmoira, Thanks for reviewing the article Thotakura Gopichand. I felt that it passes notability test as all mainstream newspapers and mediaoutlets in India have written about him and two of them had full interviews. All are reliable, secondary sources and I took about 10 reliable citations,

2796:

Dear Jeraxmoira, I've noticed your extensive experience as a Wikipedian and was wondering if it would be possible to communicate with you privately online. If this isn't permissible, I'm more than willing to ask my questions publicly. However, I would greatly appreciate it if you could provide an

2294:

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at

1165:

3768:

is an absurd claim to make. The whole point of NPR is to make judgement calls on the notability of subject which inherently require a BEFORE check. Also, you do realize that draft deletions are automatic right, if the draft sits for six months in draftspace? I can understand using draftspace to

3738:

Travel/ tour company listings are not reliable for information on architecture, significance or the origins of a location/ temple's name. They can be used for uncontroversial claims, i.e. location, coordinates etc,. SEO optimized travel websites that copy content to rank high on Google are not

4517:

Cleanup templates (hopefully) attract the kind of people this article desperately needs. I am addressing some of the many many issues, but I have a wife and a mortgage, I can't give this terrible article all of my attention while there are millions of other articles that also desperately need

2859:

I realize that you are also an AFC reviewer and choose which draft articles to review but there is an unofficial guideline for page patrollers that states newly created articles shouldn't be tagged for deletion until at least an hour after a content creator has stopped editing unless there is

3947:

The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work (for example, a

4408:—I was shocked to see ya pick up on it just before it was deleted (G13), and even more shocked that it became an article! I forgot about that draft for a while and it came as a thankful surprise to see ya work on it. Thanks for all your effort you put into it, I appreciate it—a lot! :) ~ 1386:. It was declined last week but after making changes the reviewer said it was fine but couldn't review again and accept to be fair to everyone else. It has been a week now I don't know what to do. Apologies if I have not followed any correct protocols. Kindly assist. Thank you. 911: 1405:. Thank you for reaching out to me, but I am not an AfC reviewer. You can see from the notice at the top of the draft that there are 565 pending submissions waiting for review, and they are reviewed in no particular order. Right now, all we can do is wait. Cheers <3 4134:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

4018:

1194:

because I'm concerned that you have this user right. You just took a stub article, blanked the page and tagged it as a CSD G7, which it was not, was a completely inappropriate tagging. I don't think you fully understand the criteria for speedy deletion.

1312:, Noticed the tag you placed on the article I just created, How do you wish I improved on it? I have done some copyediting to reduce the infringement. Can you kindly help on areas you think to improve on it? Or do you suggest I do more copyediting? 4078:

to create an article with a source published on the same day, which made me think it was UPE. Sadly, there is no actual way to prove this unless this SPA goes back to their previous editing pattern or recreates a deleted article. The sources on

1621:

Salute to you, elder brother, on the page created by me, Ruhaan Rajput, Mr. CNMall41 had put a quick deletion on it, which you had deleted by saying that it was wrong. Now again they have deleted the page edited by me. Please help me. Thank you

2666:, and is allowed to be and has been used on Knowledge (XXG), provided explicit attribution is given for controversial claims. However, the articles I cited are only quoting public statements reported elsewhere, and are not opinion pieces. --- 4471:? Sure, the talkpage is full of COI edit requests but large parts of the article were also written by COI editors (or people who just get super enthousiastic thinking about these music royalty distribution systems, which is the same thing). 2092:

I believe 3-4 relevant Wikiprojects are enough for an article. You seem to have a better understanding of Knowledge (XXG) policies and DYK nominations for a fairly new account. Have you had any previous experience editing Knowledge (XXG)?

2709:

I don't mind adding "according to pro-rebel TamilNet" before every sentence citing it, but I thought that would kill the flow of the article and would be unnecessary given that the quotes are already attributed to individuals/groups. ---

4137:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has

4021:

1433:

Hello once more. Thanks for helping out in improving the article. It really means a lot. I found a few articles linked to it in other pages as shown in the talk page. Is it now safe to remove the tag indicating it's an orphan article?

2385: 2347: 4681:, the draft still does not have enough independent sources and many paragraphs are unsourced. I suggest that you focus on improving existing articles rather than creating your own until you have a better understanding of how 225:: I saw your message. If what I added is not allowed, no issues. I happen to come from that town and the things I added were things I know for sure - the notable people and a school. I don't readily have references for such. 3126: 4819: 4880:, Thank you for the message. I am aware of the tool, but it didn't show up on that particular draft. That's why I wanted an admin to look at it. On a separate note, when I get the time, I'll send you an email regarding 1255:

3 days back and it only has a single database entry. I couldn't move it since it already exists as a draft, and I didn't want to leave a redirect, so I chose to G7 it. I opted for a G7 deletion because when I moved

4261: 3880: 3891: 1282:, unless you specifically suspect undisclosed COI/UPE editing, you should not insist that an editor (even a new editor) use AfC and should instead proceed to AfD if the subject does not meet notability guidelines. 2812:

It is permissible, but unless you are sharing private information, I don't see the need for emails. Either way, I do not know how to access the wiki email and have never explored it. May I ask what this is about?

3021:

I owe you an apology of what I have reacted at the AN. In future, I will work as an ordinary editor with no rights. I will get accustomed to the community and learn new things. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️

1664:

hi, I am reaching out because I have been practicing (as you know by now I guess) in an area where I am interested, which is film producers, Canadian ones and those who work between the states and Canada.

4964: 2296: 1167: 4948: 2893:

or just in general? I believe it had 98% copyvio on Earwigs and I saw multiple warnings on their talk page, so I tagged it. I will try to be more considerate and assume good faith going forward. Cheers

1013:

before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, it basically boils down to checking CSD, notability, and title). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us.

2447: 2365:

There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Knowledge (XXG), and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact.

2954: 1547: 719: 527: 423: 5185:, I was expecting someone to ask this sooner or later, haha. JerAx is a very popular player in the Dota 2 esports scene and my username was partially inspired by his in-game name. I used to play 3253:

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

2838: 2798: 3182: 1331:, The {{Copyvio-revdel}} tag, which will notify the administrators to delete the revision history containing the copyrighted text. I've already removed the copyrighted content from the article. 4343:. You should not remove the AfD notice before the discussion is closed or deleted. There is also a bot that adds back the AfD notice if it is removed before a discussion is closed or deleted. 3766:

I'm sorry, but it is not the responsibility of NPRs to find sources while patrolling new articles, as this would take up a lot of time for what I believe is an unimportant/ low-interest topic.

4786: 2397: 3869: 865:

Yes, I have just installed the tool. Thank you for letting me know. I'm not sure if you remember, but you were the first one to welcome me on Knowledge (XXG). Hope you are doing good <3

4263: 2685: 2663: 2173:

If you are going to ignore questions that do not suit your agenda, then this will be my last reply to you. Have you had any previous accounts or prior experience editing Knowledge (XXG)?

2040: 1675:

Is there anyway you have time to review it for me and critique it? After removing what you suggested and rewording, there's a tag on there for "advert" and that is not my intention.

4831: 820:. Fair to say that I've learned a lot in the last couple of days. I'm really glad we crossed paths through this article. Your patience in guiding newcomers is truly admirable. <3 910:

and then an edit conflict on my AfD nomination resulted in me overwriting your CSD tag with twinkle. I thought I'd let you know that you're welcome to add anything at the AfD here:

3881:

https://www.google.com/books/edition/Encyclopaedia_of_Tourism_Resources_in_In/nxtnsT8CdZ4C?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=bhavnagar+Takhteshwar+Temple&pg=PA106&printsec=frontcover

3292:

though about 20 articles existed both in English and Telugu, all reputed newspapers. I am not sure, how you rated it. Anyway, I am writing this in good faith. thanksk and regards,

3892:

https://www.google.com/books/edition/INDIAN_TOURISM_ISSUES_CHALLENGES_AND_IMP/woJ5EAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=bhavnagar+Takhteshwar+Temple&pg=PA17&printsec=frontcover

948:. It's all good, no worries. I think it was only moved from draft but not created during the block so I guess G5 doesn't apply here. I'll drop a comment on the AfD, thanks <3 4634: 4130: 2038:! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the 2133:

Yes, they are under Wikiproject Internet. I hope you noticed of my second question as well; could you share some details about your prior experience editing Knowledge (XXG)?

1004:; Knowledge (XXG) needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference. 4226: 4222: 4967:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

3927:

FWIW, it was not created because he directed two films. Is there any particular guideline/policy that explicitly says directors with only one film are not deemed notable?

4014: 1953: 4265: 3337:

No Worries. Yes missed it and I got the point. thanks a lot and will let it be in the draft space until more news appears. Thanks for the clarification. Best Regards,

1672:

page that I started last week ? I have priced my information from many articles that I referenced and used your advice to keep it neutral by deleting certain things.

4500:

What's the pointing of having maintenance tags when you are addressing the issues? I assumed you were already fixing it. If not, I'll look into it once you are done.

4051:. I'm not sure what evidence there is for this, but you might want to take a look at this article as well and see if should also be flagged as possible UPE? Thanks. 5105: 3316: 2481: 2459:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

1984: 1962:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

3366: 2284: 1155: 2341: 1358:

Noticed an admin has removed the tag you placed. Thank you for the help, Patient and enlightenment I really appreciate. I believe I have alots to learn from you.

4083:

are all biography listings, primary sources, and press releases. I'll do a WP:BEFORE and nominate it for deletion when I get some time. Thank you for the ping

2252: 2028: 1850:

It was my first article, and I was nervous to get everything neatly done. De-orphaned as you suggested, I'm still getting a hang of this. We'll keep in touch!

1123: 2262:

You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.

1133:

You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.

2444:

This draft is really, really borderline for me. I would have accepted if it wasn't for the fact that the article have been deleted by AfD two times before.

4930: 4193: 4119: 4003: 2239: 1110: 4857:

Hi Jeraxmoira, I've been following the COIN discussion about Saqib and noticed your question about when a deleted draft was created. I suggest installing

4074:

that was published on the same day the article was also created, 25 June. The article also used the same image from the source. It's highly unlikely for a

3870:

https://www.google.com/books/edition/Tourism_in_India/fB1vNjjdazsC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=bhavnagar+Takhteshwar+Temple&pg=PA85&printsec=frontcover

4614:

topic area, since most of my edits are from there. I have made no edits even remotely pertaining to the 1M1B organisation outside of the Afd discussion.

4437: 1724:

I read several articles after I had messaged you to make sure things were more neutral and went over it again. So hopefully someone will review it again

1050: 718:. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the 526:. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the 4258: 1274:

G7 is not appropriate here, that's for self-requested deletion of an article you created. It also arguably wasn't appropriate for the move cleanup of

2474: 2216:

in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as

1977: 1087:

in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as

848:

of the speedy deletion criteria. I believe there is a script that will do all of this for you however i don't have the link for it at the moment. ―

94: 3807: 3770:

1 month old. The way I would have dealt with the article would have been to remove the unreliable sources, done a BEFORE check and then tagged it

907: 4588: 1017: 1606: 4947:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at 3311:. Yes, but all of the sources were from April 2024 and related to a single event. I mentioned the reason for draftifying on your talk page as 3268: 3262: 2259:

not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.

1130:

not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.

3761:

I hadn't looked at the history, I had assumed you were talking about my book sources. I'd agree that the sources you removed were unreliable.

1783: 2272:, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the 1143:, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the 4843: 2409: 1058: 3810:

to restore drafts that have been deleted. I will not be replying further as my explanations above address the concerns you raised. Cheers

2688:. It clearly states that it should be used with attribution, but I don't see any attribution in the article. Are you going to add it now? 5017:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

3743:

concern, the article was moved to the draftspace. Even if it hadn't been, any editor who nominates the article will have to do their own

2586:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

618:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

2937:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

1530:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

706:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

514:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

406:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

4599: 4595: 4075: 3570: 3320: 2842: 2802: 2319: 5046: 5025: 4991: 2986: 2965: 2911: 2704: 2615: 2594: 2560: 2457:

You should try to find additional sources that aren't plain interviews - the current article I see are on the short side. Good luck!

2439: 2420: 2396:

You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

1909: 1890: 1579: 1558: 1504: 997:

is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.

751: 730: 680: 647: 626: 592: 559: 538: 488: 455: 434: 380: 4858: 1933: 3798:

The claim you called absurd is followed day in and day out by new page reviewers. I believe that is also a reason why we have the

3486:

Hey, I just wanted to thank you for moving Prabhu Patil to draftspace. I was probably too hasty in accepting it. Have a good day!

3103: 3059: 2455:

Indian media is quite poor. Combined with its low freedom of press and tendency for paid reporting, extra care should be taken.

71: 3967:

counts as being widely cited. If the film won a national or international award for the director, then one film can be excused.

3942: 2950: 2501: 2450: 2004: 1945: 1940: 1543: 419: 4839: 3774: 2405: 1054: 523: 5042: 5021: 4570: 2982: 2961: 2754:. I understand your worry that they may be repeatedly recreated as articles by the gossip brigade, so to prevent that, I have 2611: 2590: 2054:, a friendly space on Knowledge (XXG) where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 1575: 1554: 747: 726: 643: 622: 555: 534: 451: 430: 2268:

Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using

1949: 1139:

Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using

38: 4374: 4370: 4326: 798:

Thank you as well for your collegial approach to this new article. Whatever the outcome I am pleased to have met you. 🇺🇦

4942: 4830:

You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

4295:

I think he is (if interviews are notable). Sorry if I was on bad terms earlier. I initially had a different perception of

3055: 2724:

I've now added the explicit attributions. I'd appreciate it if you could also review my article for approval. Thanks, ---

1786:. I want to bring to your attention that the external link to X doesn't lead to any page there. Can you please modify it? 4780: 4552: 4189: 3698: 2881:. Thank you for letting me know. I thought we had to wait 10 minutes before placing CSD A tags on new articles from this 2231: 2220:, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the 1927: 1102: 1091:, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the 4167:, Actually i wanted to know how to find reliable sources for every change. Can you please help me with editing the same 3802:

option in the MoveToDraft script. Mainspace articles can be moved to draft with a valid reason until they are more than

3636: 3547: 3469: 3279: 2059: 2014: 4123: 4007: 2235: 1106: 277: 4682: 2226:. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you 1097:. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you 1912:

has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KeepItGoingForward was:

1702:. I would need some time to look at it again.For more information about articles reading like an advert, please see 4968: 4954: 3720:

before taking a content action that could potentially result in a article being deleted is a good idea in general.

2077:

Hello. I saw you removed Wikiproject Internet from that article. Could you please explain why did you remove that?

1598: 795:

I knew that was what you meant. I felt it important to depersonalise anything that might be construed as personal.

507: 492: 4811:

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

3694: 4714: 4668: 4330: 4080: 4044: 3964: 3411: 2159:

If Nykaa and Flipkart being internet companies can be included under Wikiproject Internet, why not IMbesharam? --

1956:

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Knowledge (XXG).

844:

to draftspace. WHen doing so, please remember to tag the redirect that is left behind for speedy deletion under

50: 4366: 4336: 4322: 3655: 3648: 3500: 3207:, I am glad I could help! If not for TLA's poor source assessment table, I would have never voted in that AfD. 1855: 715: 669: 4071: 2703:

attributing statements to public figures. Other news sites have cited one of the quotes from TamilNet I used:

1873:. Some paragraphs are still left without citations and it would be great if you could reference them as well. 116: 1811:. I placed the entire URL instead of the username in the ID field. Thank you for bringing this to my notice. 5041:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

4951:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 3632: 3465: 3276: 2981:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

2946: 2610:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

2055: 2010: 1764: 1743: 1729: 1688: 1574:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

945: 933: 920: 746:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

642:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

554:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

477: 450:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

369: 361: 346: 1915: 4710: 4678: 4664: 4619: 4243: 4175: 3243: 3107: 3063: 2882: 2323: 2280: 2164: 2124: 2082: 1833: 1791: 1363: 1317: 1260:

previously, it was deleted under G7. Could you please let me know which criteria accurately applies here?

1252: 1151: 415: 273: 75: 3825: 2452:. Look out for sites where there is a "contribute" or "submit article" button or lack an editorial team. 1970: 1894: 1030: 5114: 4935: 4304: 4271: 4237: 4149: 4029: 3972: 3917: 3835: 3787: 3727: 3669: 3495: 3099: 2729: 2715: 2671: 2548: 1760: 1600: 78:

and wanted to welcome you to the Knowledge (XXG) community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

4296: 2886: 2295:

administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the

2213: 2050: 1166:

administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the

1084: 245: 104: 5103:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at

4526: 4490: 4476: 3582: 3544: 3342: 3297: 3151: 2221: 1627: 1439: 1424: 1391: 1092: 888: 854: 581: 296: 130: 4861:

which is what Saqib used to provide the data. It can be quite helpful when researching socks/UPE.

4752:

to better understand the exact conditions that need to be in place for the G5 criteria to be valid.

4358: 3604: 2442:

has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

1721:

was "known for" and realized they are just movies on his list of credits. Nothing more. Just facts.

1703: 1022: 4980: 3608: 3433: 3401:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

3315:, but you must have missed it as it would have looked like a regular move notice. Here is a recent 3247: 2890: 2304: 2217: 1870: 1866: 1851: 1539: 1088: 882:

Huh, so I was! What a coincidence lol. I am doing well. Glad to see that you installed the tool. ―

699: 684: 665: 179: 5067: 4352: 3702: 3686: 3659: 2751: 2705:

https://www.oneindia.com/2006/04/15/slanka-army-says-foils-attack-violence-simmers-1145084856.html

2290:

Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

2269: 1211:

And in the discussion below this one, I see another admin removed a tag you placed on an article.

1161:

Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

1140: 912:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Rakul Preet Singh

249: 4881: 4643: 4604:

the tag should only be used on pages that relate to the single-purpose account's "single purpose"

4416: 3555: 2949:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 2930: 2915: 2763: 2747: 2537: 2522: 2467: 2424: 2265:

If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.

1739: 1725: 1699: 1684: 1542:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 1275: 1257: 1228: 1136:

If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.

804: 473: 418:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 365: 230: 100:

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

56: 4362: 4254: 3803: 3312: 4196:. I did a search myself and I am not able to find many reliable sources/ reviews post-release. 5100: 5073: 4615: 4185: 4171: 4115: 4100: 4056: 3824:

I find your rationale and thought process troubling to say the least. I will bring this up at

3168: 3004: 2201: 2160: 2120: 2078: 1948:). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see 1829: 1787: 1359: 1328: 1313: 1072: 971: 399: 384: 85: 5109:

and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

2755: 1759:: I saw your orphan article tag. I have now linked the page to related articles. Thank you.-- 841: 5211: 5169: 5124: 5110: 4755:

But thank you for all of your contributions to the project, your patrolling is appreciated!

4300: 4267: 4230: 4145: 4025: 3968: 3913: 3829: 3781: 3721: 3682: 3663: 3488: 2725: 2711: 2681: 2667: 2541: 1477: 1279: 316: 52: 21: 4048: 4047:

and I noticed that you had marked the other article created by the same editor as possible

3769:

quickly move obviously underdeveloped pages off off mainspace, however, this page was : -->

3239: 2518: 2273: 2256: 1144: 1127: 1009: 994: 845: 342: 304: 292: 5190: 5148: 5128: 4903: 4885: 4866: 4725: 4686: 4522: 4504: 4486: 4472: 4445: 4344: 4339:, there was no G7 tag on the deletion discussion when you removed the AfD notice from the 4282: 4197: 4164: 4084: 3999: 3984: 3928: 3902: 3811: 3748: 3706: 3596: 3574: 3530: 3510: 3372: 3338: 3324: 3308: 3293: 3246:, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at 3242:

on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at

3208: 3190: 3078: 3052: 3030: 2895: 2814: 2777: 2689: 2174: 2134: 2094: 1874: 1812: 1779: 1756: 1707: 1645: 1638: 1623: 1488: 1449: 1435: 1420: 1406: 1402: 1387: 1355: 1335: 1309: 1261: 1232: 949: 883: 866: 849: 821: 577: 327: 253: 222: 202: 142: 125: 4749: 3690: 3961:

The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors;

3451: 2473:

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and

1976:

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and

165: 5054: 4976: 4544: 4340: 3689:. There's no point in having an article with tour/travel company listings that are not 3600: 3429: 2994: 2623: 2300: 1641:. I never removed the deletion tag. I believe it was User:Vishalwikiji who removed it. 1587: 1523: 1508: 778: 759: 655: 567: 463: 187: 252:, there needs to be a reliable source supporting the information that you are adding. 5096: 4814:

Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.

4638: 4468: 4460: 4433: 4409: 4168: 3603:

to the draft space. I have heavily rewritten it. Can you review it, please? Thanks,

3551: 3538: 3143: 2773: 2759: 2536:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

2116: 1286: 1191: 1174: 817: 799: 360:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

241: 226: 3437: 3181:

Thank you for your diligence with all this recent sock/UPE mess and pushing back at

3045: 915:

but if you wanted to throw the tag back on the page, I'm not opposed to that either.

4391: 4067: 4052: 3541: 3421: 2638: 2579: 2564: 1669: 1383: 4808:

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.

4503:

I call wyverns dragons as well and its just an inclination to mythical creatures.

3227: 2797:

email address or another form of contact so that I can reach out to you directly.

2238:. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the 2027: 1109:. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the 5204: 5182: 5162: 4922: 4660: 4611: 4577: 4548: 3662:

search) that push it over the brink of notability. Am I missing something here?

1473: 611: 596: 312: 4805:

On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.

3622: 3185:. The GQ article especially was a great catch and helped me with my research. 2432: 2354: 1902: 1481: 5091: 5010: 4995: 4958: 4899: 4877: 4862: 4637:

and decide whether you wish to leave an opinion for or against retention 🇺🇦

4441: 4405: 3204: 3186: 2318:

I saw the message and I will try to be at Teahouse. I really appreciate this

2112: 4436:. It was all you though; I only expanded it a little. And I often go through 3828:

for further discussion. However, we can agree to disagree for this thread :(

5020:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

4365:

instead of improve the article I hope I will not get restricted? I am sorry

2960:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

2589:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

1553:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

1029:

If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message at the reviewer's

771: 725:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

621:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

533:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

429:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

183: 3464:

Thank you for watching non notable politician. Stay safe and stay healthy!

1002:

it requires a good understanding of Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines

54: 4793: 3908:

It is clear that you created this because he directed two films. However,

2834: 2654:

Regarding your removal of TamilNet citations from my article submission:

295:

but please note that some wikis allow organisation accounts - see Commons

4757: 2878: 2862: 2655: 1334:

Regarding the improvement, I believe you've already rephrased it. Cheers

1248: 1213: 1197: 5218: 5198: 5176: 5158:

or affiliated with him in some way? Your username just made me wonder.

5136: 5118: 5080: 5024:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

4984: 4907: 4898:

Sometimes you have to switch to source editor for the link to show up.

4893: 4870: 4847: 4766: 4733: 4718: 4694: 4672: 4649: 4623: 4582: 4530: 4512: 4494: 4480: 4453: 4423: 4308: 4290: 4275: 4225:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is

4205: 4179: 4153: 4092: 4060: 4033: 3976: 3936: 3921: 3841: 3819: 3793: 3756: 3733: 3714: 3675: 3640: 3612: 3585: 3559: 3518: 3503: 3473: 3380: 3346: 3332: 3301: 3281: 3269:

Knowledge (XXG):Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit

3216: 3194: 3111: 3086: 3067: 3038: 3023: 3011: 2964:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

2903: 2871: 2846: 2822: 2806: 2785: 2766: 2733: 2719: 2697: 2675: 2644: 2593:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

2553: 2512: 2413: 2327: 2308: 2245: 2182: 2168: 2142: 2128: 2102: 2086: 2063: 2018: 1882: 1859: 1837: 1820: 1795: 1768: 1747: 1733: 1715: 1692: 1653: 1631: 1611: 1557:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

1496: 1457: 1443: 1428: 1414: 1395: 1367: 1343: 1321: 1293: 1269: 1240: 1222: 1206: 1181: 1116: 1062: 957: 939: 926: 893: 874: 859: 829: 810: 785: 729:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

673: 625:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

585: 537:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

481: 433:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

373: 335: 320: 281: 261: 234: 210: 192: 150: 135: 2635: 2507: 1419:

No problem. Thanks for the reply and helping out by editing it. Cheers

4519: 3093: 2048:

questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the

1782:, I noticed you added the external link category in the draft article 1251:. The stub article created by the same editor was already declined at 5186: 5003: 4659:

Hello Mr Jeraxmoira Could you please review and accept this article

3747:

search. If the subject is indeed notable, it will not be nominated.

3125: 2923: 2572: 2530: 1516: 1448:

I have removed it. It will be easier if you have Twinkle installed.

692: 604: 500: 392: 354: 5053:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

4706: 4257:

and the fact that one of your journal articles mentioned this film

3701:

that were cited in the article, making it unfit for the mainspace.

2993:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

2622:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

1586:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

1016:

If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the

758:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

654:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

566:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

462:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

5155: 4598:

tag you have inappropriately and improperly placed on my comment?

5013:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 2933:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 2582:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 1526:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 702:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 614:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 510:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 402:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 112:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

3629:

Thank you for your contributions, Jerax! i am happy to see you.

3569:

Hi Jeraxmoira, I'm looking for experienced editors to interview

2369:

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited.

1678:

Before I start working on a new one, I want to get this right.

1472:

I'm going to leave it un-salted for now. It's an easy honeypot.

4949:

Template:Did you know nominations/A. Sreekar Prasad filmography

2466:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

2376:, both to advertise the event and tally the points later using 1969:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

2502:

Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors

2005:

Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors

81:

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

57: 15: 3398:

Hello, Jeraxmoira. Please check your email; you've got mail!

2484:

associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the

1987:

associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the

5002: 4792: 3621: 3391: 3226: 3029:

FWIW, you don't owe me an apology or anything of that sort.

2922: 2758:

them against recreation. Hope that addresses your concerns.

2686:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sri Lanka Reconciliation/Sources

2571: 2529: 2431: 2353: 2200: 1960:

No references showing specific notability for Anthony Tieku.

1901: 1515: 1071: 970: 908:

List of awards and nominations received by Rakul Preet Singh

691: 603: 499: 391: 353: 1681:

Thank you, happy new year. Any help would he appreciated.

1278:--G6 would have been more appropriate here. In the case of 4260:, wouldn't you also consider Raghu Samarth to be notable? 4212:

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

4118:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

4002:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

3943:

Knowledge (XXG):Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals

2776:: Yes, I believe salting is a better solution, thank you. 2377: 1922:

coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in

1914:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

5031: