Knowledge

User talk:Jeremi AI

Source 📝

122:. I was approached by journalists, one of the South African media, asking them to help understand the problem that exists today in Cape Town. I prefer to work only with authoritative sources. In Knowledge i am really a beginner. But I can not answer for the mistakes of people I do not know. And I think this is absolutely objective. If you have suggestions on how to make the article better, I will gladly take note of it. I will also be grateful for the help in creating the next articles. I think I answered all the questions. If there are no other questions, please remove this label becouse i cannt to continue working. 206: 379: 154: 27: 51:
been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Knowledge policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Knowledge
180:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
95:
Somebody called Michel Sher has been using multiple accounts (all of which were blocked), and you've joined Knowledge and immediately written about something that they were writing about, in the same style. Click through to
217:
from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Knowledge, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
184:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
341:
Also note that Knowledge articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Knowledge project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in
47:, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Knowledge administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you 467:, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee 44: 97: 40: 177: 214: 166: 39:
by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Knowledge account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at
296: 295:
be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See
437: 415: 350:
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be
421: 343: 468: 43:, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with 270: 239: 354:
from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —
258: 334:
confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see
235: 190: 114:
I study cults. More than 5 years. I do not know who and what wrote before me. Now I work with scientific articles
459: 393: 351: 170: 450: 411: 311: 266: 36: 406: 401: 389: 186: 436:. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the 454: 335: 281: 277: 161: 145: 446: 385: 323: 210: 115: 105: 61: 362: 427: 254: 265:.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to 213:
have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of
480: 464: 420:
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the
227: 123: 74: 226:
amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double
307: 262: 119: 101: 57: 378: 355: 231: 291:
own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you
250: 209:
Hello Jeremi AI, and welcome to Knowledge. All or some of your addition(s) to
424:, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: 474: 330:
be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you
449:
have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by
410:
reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be
482: 366: 261:. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, 194: 131: 109: 82: 65: 440:
to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
326:
before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources
25: 245:
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information
318:
be possible to include greater portions of a source text.
269:
information and to demonstrate that the content is not
159:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
253:. Following the source's words too closely can create 165:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
388:indicate that this user account has been or may be 276:Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is 100:
for more details and to explain what's going on. --
98:Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/Michel_Sher 41:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Michel Sher 35:Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into 178:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Nongoloza cult 8: 396:indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. 263:hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue 463:loosen or remove this block, or issue an 45:the guide to responding to investigations 297:Knowledge:Donating copyrighted materials 7: 238:in the sections on "text". See also 257:, so it is not permitted here; see 167:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 453:due to the Wikimedia Foundation's 344:Knowledge:Copying within Knowledge 14: 338:for the steps you need to follow. 230:(") and cite the source using an 176:The article will be discussed at 400:Note that multiple accounts are 377: 204: 152: 306:(that is, for sources that are 247:in your own words and structure 242:, for how to cite sources here. 280:. You may also want to review 240:Help:Referencing for beginners 222:You can only copy/translate a 1: 438:Unblock Ticket Request System 234:. You can read about this at 259:Knowledge:Close paraphrasing 469:may be summarily desysopped 499: 483:21:19, 30 April 2017 (UTC) 386:Knowledge's technical logs 367:14:15, 28 April 2017 (UTC) 322:, please seek help at the 236:Knowledge:Non-free content 195:17:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC) 132:12:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC) 110:18:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC) 83:18:05, 19 April 2017 (UTC) 66:17:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC) 422:guide to appealing blocks 169:or whether it should be 127: 78: 20:Sockpuppet investigation 200:Knowledge and copyright 30: 29: 336:Knowledge:Plagiarism 282:Knowledge:Copy-paste 278:Knowledge:Copyrights 312:compatibly licensed 211:Conjunction fallacy 465:IP block exemption 445: 255:copyright problems 116:Massimo Introvigne 31: 443: 271:original research 490: 477: 435: 432:Your reason here 381: 360: 208: 207: 187:Justeditingtoday 156: 155: 28: 498: 497: 493: 492: 491: 489: 488: 487: 486: 485: 475: 472: 444:Administrators: 425: 382: 374: 358: 304:very rare cases 232:inline citation 228:quotation marks 205: 202: 157: 153: 150: 73:What happened? 55: 54: 32: 26: 22: 12: 11: 5: 496: 494: 455:privacy policy 451:administrators 442: 441: 419: 404:, but not for 399: 398: 392:. It has been 390:used abusively 383: 376: 375: 373: 370: 348: 347: 339: 300: 285: 274: 243: 201: 198: 162:Nongoloza cult 151: 149: 146:Nongoloza cult 144:Nomination of 142: 141: 140: 139: 138: 137: 136: 135: 134: 88: 87: 86: 85: 33: 24: 23: 21: 18: 16: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 495: 484: 481: 479: 478: 470: 466: 462: 461: 456: 452: 448: 439: 433: 429: 423: 417: 413: 409: 408: 403: 397: 395: 391: 387: 380: 371: 369: 368: 364: 357: 353: 345: 340: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 308:public domain 305: 301: 298: 294: 290: 286: 283: 279: 275: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 220: 219: 216: 212: 199: 197: 196: 192: 188: 182: 179: 174: 172: 168: 164: 163: 147: 143: 133: 129: 125: 121: 120:Eileen Barker 117: 113: 112: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 93: 92: 91: 90: 89: 84: 80: 76: 72: 71: 70: 69: 68: 67: 63: 59: 53: 50: 46: 42: 38: 19: 17: 473: 458: 431: 407:illegitimate 405: 384: 349: 331: 327: 319: 315: 303: 292: 288: 249:, in proper 246: 223: 203: 183: 175: 160: 158: 148:for deletion 56: 48: 37:sockpuppetry 34: 15: 52:community. 447:Checkusers 372:April 2017 251:paraphrase 215:permission 324:help desk 124:Jeremi AI 75:Jeremi AI 460:must not 412:reverted 102:McGeddon 58:McGeddon 428:unblock 416:deleted 402:allowed 394:blocked 356:Diannaa 352:blocked 328:may not 320:However 171:deleted 457:. You 434:~~~~}} 314:), it 267:verify 224:small 476:Mkdw 363:talk 191:talk 128:talk 118:and 106:talk 79:talk 62:talk 49:have 414:or 316:may 310:or 302:In 293:may 289:you 287:If 426:{{ 365:) 359:🍁 332:do 193:) 173:. 130:) 108:) 81:) 64:) 471:. 430:| 418:. 361:( 346:. 299:. 284:. 273:. 189:( 126:( 104:( 77:( 60:(

Index

sockpuppetry
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Michel Sher
the guide to responding to investigations
McGeddon
talk
17:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Jeremi AI
talk
18:05, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/Michel_Sher
McGeddon
talk
18:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Massimo Introvigne
Eileen Barker
Jeremi AI
talk
12:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Nongoloza cult
Nongoloza cult
Knowledge's policies and guidelines
deleted
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Nongoloza cult
Justeditingtoday
talk
17:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Conjunction fallacy
permission
quotation marks
inline citation

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.