User talk:Jingiby/Archive 17

987:...След разкритията в Цариград и конфискацията на динамита там, солунските атентатори решават първо да осигурят нов динамит, а после да продължат. Това обаче се оказва трудно. Във Върховния македонски комитет в София за председател вместо Борис Сарафов, който ги е снабдявал до момента, е избран Иван Цончев. Той отказва помощ на гемиджиите, защото атентатите ще навредят на България. Орце Попйорданов отива чак в Женева, за да намери Сарафов, който дотогава ги е подпомагал финансово. Получава от него обещание да му прати динамит през Марсилия и Дедеагач и 10 000 лева. Първата пратка минава успешно през турската митница като лекарство за филоксера, но е прибрана от Иван Гарванов – председател на ЦК на ВМОРО. Това изостря крайно отношенията на гемиджиите с организацията и те престават да я държат в течение на своята работа. Атентаторите успяват да се снабдят със 160 кг. динамит от България, пренесен в чували с ориз или тенекии със зехтин, и решават да се справят само с него (вероятно този е бургаския). Заради недостатъчния експлозив се отказват да взривят и одринската поща. За сметка на това решават с наличния динамит да извършат още няколко атентата, които да всеят ужас в Солун... 323:

shouldn't. I'm not disrespecting its people or their right to an idenity. I'm not even saying that these people are not Macedonians in one way or other. What I am saying, is that the map identifying FYROM as the Republic of Macedonia is not current or correct. I would personally like to see it as a republic of some sort of Macedonia, but history isnt' that black or white. As you know there are other Macedonias and that is why there is a dipute currently underway. Let's talk about it. Perhaps I will better udnerstand your perspective and you mine. Kind Regards, Veluhi

1265:. The Balkan Federation furthermore was a federation of states that included a Greater Yugoslavia within it, but Romania and Greece that was included in the Federation was not going to be wholly annexed into Yugoslavia. It was a federation promoted by Tito and the SFRY. Greater Yugoslavia was supported by both the Kingdom of Yugoslavia and Tito, as well as the British government in 1941 - again prior to the SFRY. Here is what I added when, it clearly states that a Greater Yugoslavia was pursued before the SFRY: 1814: 31: 675:

inclined at the time or that it was deemed the Germany of the Balkans? I think the infobox can take it. And while I am at it, I might as well add the same text to every single article of a Romanian, Serbian, and Montenegrin people (born pre-1878) and every Bulgarian (born pre-1908). I am not yet sure how this newborn rule would apply to US citizens and Canadians, but I will definitely be looking into the matter. --

3409:. That's a fact. Saying "whoops, I messed up!" tends to get better results than posting flippant messages to the person calling you on your behaviour in a language other than English (obwohl ich selber Deutsch verstehen kann, können viele hier in der englischen Knowledge es nicht verstehen ). So you're wasting bytes casting aspersions on FutPerf when you should be thinking about what you're going to do with 965:Динамитът е произведен във фабрика в Бургас, създадена от Гоце Делчев през 1900 година (по това време предлага и Михаил Герджиков да оглави организацията в Одринско), и е пренесен от фелдшера Кръсто Халчов Стоянов в Цариград, който го препраща до брат си Димитър в Солун.(Иван Карайотов, Стоян Райчевски, Митко Иванов: История на Бургас. От древността до средата на ХХ век, Печат Тафпринт ООД, Пловдив, 2011, 1457: 3024:

as a constituent of it. If you insist on such a formulation, then it would be more to the point to say "Macedonian and the other South Slavic languages...", avoiding those long-winded opening sentences. "Language contact between Macedonian and Serbo-Croatian during Yugoslav times, influenced the Macedonian so much, that even today the colloquial speech of the city" is unacceptable English. --

1510:

republic unifying the Balkan Peninsula on the basis of internationalism, socialism, social solidarity, and economic equality.". This has nothing to do with the general idea of a Greater Yugoslavia as promoted by the Kingdom of Yugoslavia - a conservative royalist dictatorship since 1929. This nullifies the previous discussion that was not aware of the examples outside the Balkan Federation.--

3209: 1941:

numbers because you have cited the actual publications rather than citing abstracts. I would appreciate it if you could help me find these articles. I do not find the current form of citation a reliable means of referencing. It's not the sources I have a problem with, just the way it has been cited, all other sources in the article have the relevant page numbers for verificiation.

950:Все пак организация с името БМОРК към 1903 не съществува. Атентатите са организирани в Солун от ученически кръжок под влиянието на анархистите от Женевската група. Парите и динамита им са от ВМОК на Сарафов. Гарванов ги плаши с ликвидация, понеже застрашават организацията на въстанието, а Делчев се пазари с тях да ги отложат. Учениците обещали, а сетне се отметнали. 2646:. Undoing other editors—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See below for exemptions. 3117:

type (linguists invariably consider language contact as it occurs naturally). The first source speaks of cultural assimilation in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia (i.e. before the implementation of the standard) and does not explicitly mention language. The second source similarly speaks of cultural assimilation and discrimination in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. --

3775: 3186: 3172:, when Macedonia was set up as a Yugoslav Republic and Macedonian was proclaimed as its literary language, the Macedonian dialects...has been subsumed under this new linguistic standard, which raised them to four... Although there is no clear dividing line between these two languages (Bulgarian and Macedonian) on level of dialect, the 648:=independent nation. There is no condition for a member state to leave a trade bloc except that it is no longer signatury to the affairs and can therefore no longer have a say in matters. Before 1908, all of Bulgaria was internationally recognised as having been Ottoman territory and that takes precedence on infoboxes where 3321:

Und bückte sich wieder nieder und schrieb auf die Erde. Da sie aber das hörten, gingen sie hinaus, einer nach dem andern, von den Ältesten bis zu den Geringsten; und Jesus ward gelassen allein und das Weib in der Mitte stehend. Jesus aber richtete sich auf; und da er niemand sah denn das Weib, sprach

3301:

And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground. And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst. When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the

3110:

After the forced serbianisation implemented during the interbellum, the subsequent intensive language contact between Macedonian and Serbo-Croatian reached its height during Yugoslav times, so much so that the colloquial speech of the city of Skopje has been described as a "creolized form of Serbian"

3023:

in "Torlakian was also widely regarded". "Together with Bulgarian and Torlakian" is an overstatement: Bugarian, Macedonian, Serbo-Croatian and Torlakian are all included in the Balkan sprachbund. This is an article about Macedonian, so the Balkan sprachbund itself isn't being defined, only Macedonian

2932:

Hello! I did not delete reliable information from Cyrillic script like you write on my page. My edits are not "unconstructive". I changed "Old Macedonian" to "Old Bulgarian". And from "Macedonian brothers" i deleted the word "Macedonian". And my edits are not reverted or removed like you say. At this

1582:

You removed my template of pictures of ethnic Macedonians saying the edit was not constructive. This is completely, utterly and absolutely untrue. All of people represented on the template are recognized as ethnic Macedonians by both the Macedonians and the Republic of Macedonia. The only POV that is

438:

for its 1999-2008 period. During that time it was nominally within Serbia (including the union with Montenegro until 2006) but in February 2008, it declared independence. These days with more countries than there were then and slightly different circumstances, Kosovo's road to full recognition is not

3577:

What the source says is: ...The development of a Slav literacy was crucial in preventing assimilation of the Slavs, either by cultures of the north, or by the Greek culure to the south... Thus as Crampton notes, the legacy helped the Bulgarians develop a national consciousness which, though far from

2507:

Please, explain what do you want to say with these sources, how they are related to the alleged Delchev's Macedonian regional indentity etc. I waited several days for this, but you didn't answer. In this situation, the return of the sources should go through further dialogue. I hope you will respect

2293:

The Bulgarian loyalties of IMRO's leadership, however, coexisted with the desire for multi-ethnic Macedonia to enjoy administrative autonomy. When Delčev was elected to IMRO's Central Committee in 1896, he opened membership in IMRO to all inhabitants of European Turkey since the goal was to assemble

494:

Very similarly, Serbia defined itself independent from 1869 within its constitution but it took until 1878 for this to be recognised. Bulgaria also achieved the status it desired at the same treaty and this gave the country its full outline including Macedonia and the area of West Thrace (Greece) up

3256:

More specifically: Jingiby, you need to re-examine your whole method of editing. You keep copying text all over the place, all the time. I've realized for a long while that you never, ever write any article content of your own. Your English is far too poor for that. If you tried, your text would be

2705:

I'm going to remove the two genetic-related paragraphs in the origin section of Turkish people because there is already a page called Genetic history of the Turkish people which is about the genetic studies of Turkish related people, and there is no need to mention the same or similar contributions

566:

as an entity went through various stages of promotion so simply listing POS per se doesn't say very much unless the individual knew the condition of the entity in the given year. Although BG raised its status to kingdom immediately from 1908, it still remains that the pre-1908 entity had no de jure

3271:

side to it. Keep stuff in one place. Second, it makes it impossible to track where material originally comes from and who is responsible for it. Third, it actually is a copyright violation too. Even if the text is a freely licensed Knowledge text, you must not copy it without attribution. The very

3131:

The cultural assimilation included also forced linguistic serbianisation. The local dialects were regarded Serbian. More, the locals were regarded Serbs. The Serbian was the only language teached in the schools. I am going to modify my statement and to support it with reliable sources which point

1940:

Thanks for your quick reply Jingiby. Yes I found a few summaries from random websites as well but I wondered if you actually had these articles, or have at some point had access to them. I've tried finding them on specialised searches such as JSTOR but can't find them anywhere. I've asked for page

1509:

that demonstrates that Greater Yugoslavia is not completely connected to the Balkan Federation supported by Tito and the SFRY. The article says that the Balkan Federation was a left-wing revolutionary socialist idea and says "The central aim was to establish a new political unity: a common federal

1210:

present at significant freqeuncies in Macedonians, Serbians, Bulgarians, Romanians and northern Greeks. Croats and Bosnians are dominated so much by I2, Slovenians have little E3b if at all; southern Greeks have mostly E3b and J2, northern Slavs mostly R1a, and western Europeans almost exclusively

674:

Sorry to interfere in what looks like a really interesting debate, which might as well end with having possibly the lamest infobox text wiki-wide. Is this detail really that important that it should be in the infobox? I mean, shouldn't we add, for example, that Bulgaria also also a bit anti-Russia

3116:

You cannot splice two sources together to arrive at your conclusion. From the second source ("creolized form of Serbian") is isn't explicit if it arose from a forced serbianisation or otherwise. Given that the source speaks of "language contact", it is unlikely that it is referencing force of any

1382:

As you can see it is distinct from the Balkan Federation - Greater Yugoslavia existed prior to the SFRY's support of such a federation, and proponents of a Greater Yugoslavia including both the Kingdom of Yugoslavia and the SFRY never sought to annex the whole of Greece and Romania into a Greater

3562:

You have been warned a number of times about misrepresenting sources. Poulton (2000) does not mention a "distinct Bulgarian ethnic consciousness" arising from the development of Old Church Slavonic literary. He says the effect of it prevented the assimilation of the Slavs and the legacy of which

3228:

for more information on uploading your material to Knowledge. For legal reasons, Knowledge cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a

1984:

3. Alu insertion polymorphisms and an assessment of the genetic contribution of Central Asia to Anatolia with respect to the Balkans. Berkman CC, Dinc H, Sekeryapan C, Togan I. Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University, 06531 Ankara, Turkey. American Journal of Physical

1893:

article regarding their genetics; however, I have not been able to find them anywhere. Do you by any chance have copies of these articles which you can send me? Furthermore, are the studies within these article based on all people from Anatolia or just people who consider themselves to be ethnic

1654:

When there are seven different sources that state that the Pomaks speak Bulgarian and the only contradictory sources are a tertiary source that doesn't actually say anything like that and a source that mentions in passing that Macedonian speaking Muslims are sometimes referred as Pomaks, that is

2344:

I do not understand your agenda. Delchev was supporter of the motto "Macedonia to the Macedonians". He fought for autonomy of the area, not for unification with Bulgaria. He allowed the inclusion of the non-Bulgarians in the anti-Ottoman struggle. Neither Greeks, nor the Serbians supported such

2456:

Oh, this is clear. However I have to remind that we are talking about Gotse Delchev and the assertion that he (maybe?!) "...progressively constructed a particular spirit of regional identity". Please, note that we are not talking about regional identity in this region in general, but about the

2360:

I agree with all your sentences and I want to make a clarification only to the latter. In fact, the clarification should be made to the text in the article. There are a claim in the article that Delchev "... progressively constructed a particular spirit of regional identity". The source do not

1187:

Bosnia. Bosnia has until recently been demographically sparse and culturally isolated, so the idea of a demographic expansion from there is not probable. Rather, the high frequency of I2a2 there is due to a recent founding event (lie the high R1b in Basques, or high E1b1b in Kosovo Albanians).

561:

What you're saying is at odds with the article which states that POR was a vassal of the OE. In other words, it was de facto independent. To that end, it s still required that we present the sovereign body. Serbia's principality was proclaimed with the first uprising in 1804, became internally

3167:

The south-Slavic linguistic area is generally regarded as as one of the most interesting in Europe... The number of languages into which this continuum is officially segmented has been subject to change, however. Up until World War II there were three: Slovenian, Serbo-Croatian and Bulgarian.

2230:

Dear Jingiby, you are right about 14th c., but in the 7th c. that area was called Atil-kiji in Bulgarian, and I do not want to enter into pissing contest with POV people. Atil-kiji is the first historical name for the area that we know, from 9th c. or some earlier. Next one was Bessarabia. In

322:

Hello there. I have noticed you have reversed my editing. I would like to discuss this with you if that is ok. My objection is with regard to the Republic of Macedonia. As you might know it is provisionally listed with the name FYROM. I'm not saying this state does not exist or that it

562:

recognised in 1830, funtioned independently from 1867 with the expulsion of Ottomans, defined itself independent in 1869 with the new constitution, gained internationally recognised status in 1878 at the Treaty of Berlin and finally elevated itself to kingdom in 1882. So as you can see,

1969:

1. Turkish Population Structure and Genetic Ancestry Reveal Relatedness among Eurasian Populations, Uğur Hodoğlugil1, Robert W. Mahley, The Authors Annals of Human Genetics © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/University College London, Issue: Annals of Human Genetics, Volume 76, Issue 2,

2523:

I still have doubts about the adequacy of one or two sources to the question (specifically for Delchev), but the argument for Young Macedonian Literary Society is excellent. I will not read literally the sources anymore. You can go back sometime and reflect on some of them. Regards,

1342:, the British government supported the creation of a Greater Yugoslavia after the war due to opposition to the Bulgarian government's accession to the Axis Powers, in May 1941 endorsing Dr. Malcom Burr's paper in favour of the incorporation of Bulgaria into Yugoslavia after the war. 731:

I agree. It should be city and country of birth only with no intermediary entities (ie. Ottoman Empire only). Suzerain states are a bit of a pain however, the host nation is not a functioning authority. Nevertheless, I have amended it in a more compromising way, see what you think.

1153:

I am beginning to think that Nordvedt is correct about I2a2. Basically, he uses the 'germline mutation' rate rather than "effective evolutionary". The latter blows out age estimates by a factor of 3 (ie 8ky rather than 2.5 kYA for I2a2; or "Palaeolithic" vs "Neolithic" for R1b).

3404:

Jingiby, I'm afraid I may be wasting my time here, but I've got to ask: Do you not understand the severity of this situation? Copyright violations are dealt with more strictly than any other offence on Knowledge except plain old vandalism. People who violate copyright here get

609:. I think we've concluded this Jingiby. The principality was a suzerain body which was internationally recognised as having been an entity of the Ottoman Empire. Bulgaria divorced itself from its former overlord in 1908 even if there was no Ottoman influence after 1878. 3340:И опять, наклонившись низко, писал на земле. Они же, услышав и будучи обличаемы совестью, стали уходить один за другим, начиная от старших до последних; и остался один Иисус и женщина, стоящая посреди. Иисус, восклонившись и не видя никого, кроме женщины, сказал ей: 772:

This idea was popular during the 18-th and 19-th century. For example Blasius Kleiner in his History of Bulgaria from 1761 wrote that the Bulgarian name came from the name of the river Volga. For the first time this hypothesis was mentioned by the Byzantine historian

2406:

Thank you for this source. It is interesting, but it does not surprise me with something fundamentally. I red about Macedonian-Adrianopole state (NB!), but I couldn't find evidences for Macedonian (regional) identity. Maybe I have not red carefully. Can you help me,

3150:

Can you please provide excerpts from sources 20-26. Where do they state "Macedonian dialects were described by most linguists as being dialects of Bulgarian"? Or are *you* deciding who "most linguists" were based on the number of sources *you* find on Google Books?

1583:

blatant, is your Bulgarian POV, which I understand you recognize some of my people as Bulgarian or non-Macedonian. It's fine with me but it's not fine when you are going so far to alter the page because of your biased opinion, not because they are non-Macedonians.

931:Всичко с времето си, пък и учениците не са били сами, или как достига динамита от Бургас в Солун?. По-добре, да не привличаш много внимание, за да нямаме дискусия за изтриване на българите от мак.. . В момента нямам време, а ще съм пак сам срещу доста-- 2007:

Sorry if this is annoying you, but I'm not asking for the page numbers of the whole article from a journal, only the page number in which you are specifically citing. It doesn't matter, I'll try find access to these articles some place else. Thanks

2434:...The Bulgarian historians, such as Veselin Angelov, Nikola Achkov and Kosta Tzarnushanov continue to publish their research backed with many primary sources to prove that the term 'Macedonian' when applied to Slavs has always meant only a 3578:

that associated with modern nationalism, was strong to preserve the concept of Bulgaria and the Bulgarians as a distinct entity... This sence was cemented by the conquests of Simeon the Great (i.e. during the 9th and 10th centuries...)

495:

to the sea. Then came the turn of events because of western interest and Bulgaria had its wings clipped, we both know the story from that point. I admit I am not one for comprehending the full facts on self-governing entities; I know

707:. Particularly if the text has no direct relation to the subject of the article. It is not that important if he was born in an independent or a puppet-state as long as he was born there. I hope this could help resolve the dispute. -- 3367:

Does that mean you are refusing to change your editing habits? I need a clear, unambiguous promise from you that you are going to edit differently in future; without that, I'll have to take you straight to either

1699:

All sources mention the Torbeshi, some Torbeshi and Gorani as part of the wider Pomak comunity. Their language is described as Macedonian or transitional between Macedonian, Serbian and Bulgarian, i.e. Torlakian.

133:? For some reason, the diff only shows me one huge big paragraph without actually highlighting the modified bits, and short of parsing every single word of it I'm just not finding your modification. By the way, 2132: 3785:

regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is

2128: 1684:

Of your sources two didn't mention Pomaks at all, one mentioned them without saying what language they spoke and the fourth specifically explained that they speak Bulgarian. So they are not adequate.

588:

Bulgaria was then not a sovereign state. Bulgaria is also today not fully sovereign state, as part from the EU. However, then and now it has been an separate mostly self-governing entity, i.e. state.

1430:

The central aim was to establish a new political unity: a common federal republic unifying the Balkan Peninsula on the basis of internationalism, socialism, social solidarity, and economic equality.

3433:

Heimstern, I am not an Idiot. Certainly, also I do not think I'm infallible. One learns his lifetime. My desire is what was done by me wrong until now, must not to be repeated again in the Future.

157:. By the second, the idea is that after the attacks of the Gemidzhii it was launched mass mobilization of Ottoman soldiers and that led to the tracking of Delchev's cheta and later to his killing. 2430: 1925:'s site is a summary of the most important DNA studies of the Turkish population with direct links to the Abstracts. Also, there are not page's numbers on abstract publications. Regards. 2289:

Also, by Delchev the term Macedonian was beginning to acquire the significance of a certain political loyalty, that progressively constructed a particular spirit of regional identity."

3688: 3178:

Language, discourse and borders in the Yugoslav successor states - Current issues in language and society monographs, Birgitta Busch, Helen Kelly-Holmes, Multilingual Matters, 2004,

1655:

nearly not enough for Macedonian to be included as a native language of the Pomaks. In fact, a note should be added that the Torbesh and Goranis are rarely referred as Pomaks today.

3267:

Internally copying text from other Knowledge articles, as you very often do, is also bad. Don't do that either. First, it leads to unnecessary duplication of material, often with a

3420:? Really? You think that's going to solve your problem? Maybe you should read the one about "let him who stole steal no longer", since copyright violation is essentially stealing. 3926: 3684: 1235:

is no longer valid because I have found evidence of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia seeking to create a Greater Yugoslavia. This was not the Balkan Federation proposed by Tito and the

2979:

Before changing the content of the pages drastically as you did there discuss it on the talk-page and provide a lot of reliable sources in support of your opinion. Thank you.

3297:...But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not. So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them: 3019:"Similarly to Macedonian" is clumsy English in this case; here "similarly" means "in the same way". It's a common conjunctive in formal English. The ref does not source the 2245:

Barefact, I have changed the name of the river from Borysthenes to Danapris immediately after your comment with an edit on July 2. Just take a look on the article. Regards.

439:

as smooth as Bulgaria's was in 1908 but that's another story. How would you feel about the old Kosovo solution to this situation: Principality of Bulgaria (nominally within

2563:

has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Bulgaria". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation.

1353:

Cecil Frank Melville. Balkan racket: the inside story of the political gangster plot which destroyed Yugoslavia and drove Britain out of the Balkans. Jarrold, 1941. Pp. 61.

2567:

is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the

3816: 1853: 3043:

Are you actually following the related discussion at Talk:Turkey or are you just blindly reverting? Because Lumialover makes a very valid point at that discussion.

1432:". This has nothing to do with the general idea of a Greater Yugoslavia as promoted by the Kingdom of Yugoslavia - a conservative royalist dictatorship since 1929.-- 3871:

It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.

2294:

all dissatisfyed elements in Macedonia and Adrianople regions regardless of ethnicity or religion in order to win through revolution full autonomy for both regions

3373: 2361:

asserts that. The idea for autonomy, the admission of other nationalities do not confirmed the assertion that Delchev constructed a particular spirit of regional

1113: 1023: 605:

Bulgaria is a sovereign nation. 27 sovereign states compose the EU: the EU in turn is an intergovernmental trade bloc. Prior to the EU, Bulgaria was a member of

1827: 1469:

Makedonski Laf od Smilevo like your picture though, thankyou for helping me with the articles whoever you are ? A Bulgarian Historian ? Anyway goodluck

1109: 1019: 3930: 3712: 2124: 3832:

discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.

2389:Идването на Гоце Делчев в Тракия и някои уточнения по този повод. Идеологическите спорове между Гоце Делчев и Стоян Лазов. Непубликувани спомени на очевидци 1542: 3284:

If your English is too poor to contribute constructively with your own text, you should reconsider whether this project is really the right place for you.

1748: 3736: 3708: 296:

Maybe, but it still looks awkward and disconnected. I suggest we trim the ethnogenesis part to a minimum, it creates a lot of ground for speculation. - ☣

3188:. That means in simple words: In the South - Slavic dialect continuum, the Macedonian language was delimited from Bulgarian after the Second World war. 2108: 1538: 1412:

The Kingdom's goal of a Greater Yugoslavia nor the British support in 1941 of Yugoslav annexation of Bulgaria is not related to the Balkan Federation.--

1362:

Sabrina P. Ramet. The three Yugoslavias: state-building and legitimation, 1918-2005. Bloomington, Indiana, USA: Indiana University Press, 2006. Pp. 172.

390: 3317:

Aber Jesus bückte sich nieder und schrieb mit dem Finger auf die Erde. Als sie nun anhielten, ihn zu fragen, richtete er sich auf und sprach zu ihnen:

2508:

my desire to clarify the situation according the rules and you will not continue with the attempt to impose your POV without explanations. Thank you.--

1744: 3732: 3672: 3532: 3479: 3221: 2854: 2084: 2068: 1758: 1552: 1123: 1033: 846: 400: 3787: 3782: 3336:Но Иисус, наклонившись низко, писал перстом на земле, не обращая на них внимания. Когда же продолжали спрашивать Его, Он, восклонившись, сказал им: 3225: 2791:

cover? If it doesn't cover all the formerly uncited text, it'd be great if you could add a citation needed tag before the sources sections. Cheers,

2104: 1316: 1262: 1236: 836: 386: 351: 2080: 1257:

The reason why it is inappropriate is because I have found sources demonstrating that a Greater Yugoslavia was advocated during the period of the

3522: 434:

to Vlado Chernozemski but on principle, the practice is still to provide sovereign nations. A latter day instance of a similar scenario involves

3257:

riddled with grammatical errors. When you add substantial amounts of text somewhere, it appears it is almost always copied from somewhere else.

3237:, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators 2870: 832: 2732: 2576: 1206:

In fact, if you observe all the haplogroups R1a, R1b, E3b, I2a and even J2 of Europe - what do you notice about their distribution ? They are

3668: 3564: 3528: 3518: 3475: 3152: 3118: 3025: 2850: 2064: 1754: 1548: 1119: 1029: 969: 842: 801: 704: 396: 3469: 2894: 2866: 2572: 1606: 2933:

time they are still there in the article.The only difference is the words "Byzantine Greek" is added in front of "brothers". Thank you.

3465: 3380: 3288: 3248: 2890: 2217: 1857: 141: 2525: 2509: 2492:

Do not delete reliable sources, please. If you don't understand their meaning and their interconnection, I kan't help you. Thank you.

2476: 2458: 2408: 2373: 2330: 2301: 631: 3584: 3264:, is copyright violation plain and simple. Never do that again; the next time I catch you doing it I will ask for an indefinite ban. 2583:

Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 6 August 2012.

699:

Sarcasm aside, I really think this info is quite unnecessary in this case. As the text stood, one could simply click on the link to

236: 503:

but am I not right in thinking that suzerain status deemed the region was still subject to another's sovereignty? Or did the term

2368:

P.S. If on the base of his political views, we accept the construction of some regional identity, should we talk about Macedonian-

3680: 3661:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

3608: 2949: 2728: 2821: 2736: 2568: 2422:

Chek then "Contested Ethnic Identity: The Case of Macedonian Immigrants in Toronto, 1900-1996, Chris Kostov, Peter Lang, 2010,

1793: 3525:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3472:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1751:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1545:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1116:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1026:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 839:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 393:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3865: 3665:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3377: 3285: 3245: 3182: 2965:

Stop your propaganda POV on the Cyrillic page. This is not Skopie pedia! If you continue you will be banned for vandalism.

2847:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2739:, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the 2426: 2214: 2061:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 138: 3326:

Sie aber sprach: Herr, niemand. Jesus aber sprach: So verdamme ich dich auch nicht; gehe hin und sündige hinfort nicht mehr!

1981:, Who Are the Anatolian Turks? A Reappraisal of the Anthropological Genetic Evidence, Aram Yardumian and Theodore G. Schurr. 1894:

Turks? Also, you have not placed any page numbers for your citation, it would help if you include those within the article.

758:

Hi. Have you heard of any works or scholars who have attempted to link the name "Bulgar" with the river "Volga" ? Happy NY

3635: 2773: 2740: 2598: 2560: 2206: 270:

of the subsection makes no sense. There is no connection whatsoever between the paragraphs before and after this text. - ☣

3165:

No problem, all of this old books are describing Macedonian as part of Bulgarian. But more interesting is this citation:

3912: 3389:

Future, Ich kenne dich gut and du mich, also. Die Future wird zeigen, ob jeder von uns wird sich ändern. Das ist alles.

2748: 339: 72: 67: 3309: 2706:

repetitively in both of the articles. You can go on genetic-related contributions on the genetic related page. Thanks.

183:. I am not planning to follow up on this complaint myself. If you want to have admins look into the matter, please use 3000:

Perhaps you are interest on this article which I nominated for deletion, so I'm welcoming you to particite. Thank you.

2817: 2806: 38: 59: 3240: 2669:

NP - I see someone else is now involved - hopefully we can get the IP to the talk page if it is reverted again.

1789: 3662: 3568: 3156: 3122: 3029: 2844: 2744: 2058: 1602: 1216: 1197: 1159: 763: 700: 431: 3509:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3452:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1861: 3627: 2796: 2747:. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see 2529: 2513: 2480: 2462: 2412: 2377: 2334: 2305: 1323:

sought to create a Greater Yugoslavia that would incorporate within Yugoslavia's borders: Aegean Macedonia,

541: 470: 473:

by the Principality of Bulgaria in 1885 and this fact was de jure reconized by the Empire in 1886 with the

2945: 2594: 1506: 1272: 1101: 1011: 563: 2345:

strange ideas. He supported this unusual regionalism, and Delchev developed strong his local patriotism.

1598: 1168:

And what about the place of origin of this mutation - Poland/Ukraine/Belarus or Croatia/Bosnia/Slovenia?

3829: 2711: 1820: 1813: 1669:

I added several sources that part of the Pomaks are speaking Macedonian. Do not delete them. Thank you.

1519: 1312: 1258: 1070: 232: 2231:

addition, even Greeks did not know exactly where Borysthenes was, the name was applied to few rivers.

2172:

Ow, a Serbian-Bulgarian kerfuffle :) Sorry, I'm not clued in automatically. Please feel free to apply

1835: 1798: 228: 3704: 3376:. (Oh, and don't you Jesus me; I for one will have no compuctions throwing stones at you if needed.) 3217: 2941: 2937: 2619:

from editing to prevent further disruption. While any edit warring may lead to sanctions, there is a

1594: 1211:

R1b. I am writing a paper which I hope to get published which explains the significance of this fact

327: 224: 192: 180: 101: 93: 3905: 3854: 3424: 3213: 3089: 3059: 3044: 2759: 2564: 1736: 1633: 1530: 1428:

The article says that the Balkan Federation was a left-wing revolutionary socialist idea and says "

1332: 1212: 1193: 1155: 774: 759: 537: 3306:

She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more...

2329:

Which title? We have an assertion in the text and probably inadequate (to the assertion) source.--

2196: 2038:, which in academic literature is used to communicate succinctly concerning the complex research. 891:Не към наясно как точно става. Ако знаеш - прехвърли я. Тя е с изтекли авторски права. С поздрав! 3882: 3728: 3615: 3268: 3093: 3063: 3048: 2792: 2547: 2533: 2501: 2448: 2400: 2354: 2323: 2309: 2268: 2236: 2035: 1587: 1232: 331: 3929:, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located 2735:. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the 2365:. This is not the same. Even faithful things can not be proved by sources that do not say that. 1227:

The discussion on Greater Yugoslavia did not include pre-Tito proposals of a Greater Yugoslavia

3760: 3647: 3592: 3581: 3563:

bolstered bolstered a national identity "far from that associated with modern nationalism". --

3548: 3495: 3438: 3394: 3357: 3193: 3179: 3141: 3078: 3005: 2984: 2918: 2901: 2769: 2691: 2657: 2590: 2543: 2497: 2444: 2423: 2396: 2350: 2319: 2250: 2200: 2156: 2139: 2100: 2043: 2020: 1994: 1953: 1930: 1906: 1875: 1774: 1705: 1674: 1568: 1491: 1402: 1328: 1173: 1139: 1086: 1049: 996: 966: 955: 896: 862: 786: 741: 661: 639: 618: 593: 576: 549: 520: 482: 474: 452: 430:

We both know the history of Bulgaria's long transition to independence. You were right to add

416: 374: 359: 313: 286: 252: 206: 162: 115: 47: 17: 3344:Она отвечала: никто, Господи. Иисус сказал ей: и Я не осуждаю тебя; иди и впредь не греши... 2970: 2707: 2620: 2173: 2166: 2076: 1720: 1689: 1660: 1626: 1308: 1296: 1065: 977: 936: 922: 914: 881: 335: 3842:

It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about

2616: 1846: 1474: 1320: 824: 809: 645: 466: 298: 272: 188: 97: 3901:. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion. 2586:

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.

813: 3781:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

1918: 1852:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

3942: 3890: 3886: 3790:". Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! 3510: 3421: 2829: 2755: 2674: 1977:

2. Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia, Issue: Volume 50, Number 1 / Summer 2011,

1890: 1515: 1437: 1417: 1388: 1248: 1192:), because this region, too, was hardly if at all inhabited in the 6 - 7 th centuries. 440: 3276:

do is acknowledge the copying in your edit summaries (e.g. "... copying material from

989:

50-те най-големи атентата в българската история, № 2. Солунските атентати, Крум Благов

3898: 3751: