145:, got it, makes sense why you were asking! I promise I'm not being paid although that sure would be nice! :) Just a fan of edtech and tech. I made an improvement to that investor page only because I was googling who the guy was that was interviewing Doug. Since this was the first time I created a page I was clicking around to different pages to imitate the tone / style / sections and made some improvements along the way.
325:
383:
268:
439:
342:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see
72:
Hi Girth! Do I reply to you by simply writing right here? I hope this works. I am a teacher who loves technology in general and edtech in particular. I'm a user and fan of the
Mystery Science / Mystery Doug product, in addition to a variety of other technology tools and I'm interested in the people
148:
I read the links you provided, they were very helpful. I hope my improvements help address his notability. He really is a big deal, I'm amazed there isn't even more about him online! I think this speaks to a general under-appreciation of us teachers as professionals. The pure "business people" get
407:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
292:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
107:
So, what interested me was the fact that you wrote up all of these articles - about the company, the YouTube channel, and Peltz himself, plus you edited the article about one of their investors. That's very similar to the type of activity we sometimes see
76:
I see that the
Mystery Doug article wasn't complete enough. I got started with it but didn't put a lot of time into it yet so I probably shouldn't have published it. I didn't realize you could have things in a draft mode. Thanks for doing that!
51:
here. I noticed that you have been contributing a number of articles about companies and people connected with
Mystery Science. Can I ask whether you have any kind of connection to this company, or any of the people involved with it? Thanks
411:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
296:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
111:
editors who have been paid to write articles, or who are connected with the subjects. Editing like that isn't prohibited, but there are steps you have to take to declare your connection, which are outlined at
404:
149:
all the coverage in media. Meanwhile this guy is one of the most popular teacher in the country with kids with millions of fans, but I think I found some good sources that showed it.
104:, but basically you just type u|GirthSummit inside a set of curly brackets in your message (you need to sign your post with four tildes to trigger the notification).
289:
394:
279:
446:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
80:
I saw your feedback about the Doug Peltz article and I'm going to spend some more time on that and incorporate more and better source material. Thanks!
100:, hi - yes, you can reply like that, although it's easier if you ping me so I get a notification that you've replied. You can read more about that at
354:
236:
for this article. We don't host articles about commercial enterprises that aren't supported by reliable, secondary and independent sourcing. Thanks
208:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge (XXG)'s
338:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a
123:
Please do read those links I gave you - especially the stuff about sourcing, which is really what this all boils down to.
343:
398:
283:
212:
and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
389:
373:
31:
465:
334:
201:
309:
245:
221:
132:
61:
447:
150:
97:
83:
464:
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available
142:
476:
27:
458:
443:
431:
173:
165:
233:
48:
420:
301:
237:
213:
124:
53:
117:
101:
454:
209:
113:
472:
362:
457:. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request
339:
187:
181:
177:
197:
193:
416:
453:
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under
176:, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
358:
274:
258:
480:
442:
Hello, Jjwilliamson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
424:
366:
314:
250:
232:
A bit more on this - the sourcing needs to meet the standards described at
226:
158:
137:
91:
66:
37:
438:
22:
405:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Mystery
Science (company)
323:
393:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge (XXG) according to
278:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge (XXG) according to
192:
Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
120:. If you have no such connection, there isn't a problem.
387:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
272:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
471:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge (XXG).
353:will be deleted after seven days, as described in
290:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Doug Peltz
355:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
349:Note that any non-free images not used in any
200:on Knowledge (XXG)). I've moved your draft to
320:Orphaned non-free image File:Mystery doug.png
8:
461:of the content if it meets requirements.
395:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
280:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
21:Thanks for your edits to articles like
7:
14:
403:The article will be discussed at
288:The article will be discussed at
172:An article you recently created,
437:
381:
266:
1:
367:03:32, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
344:our policy for non-free media
315:12:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
251:19:44, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
227:19:41, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
159:17:14, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
138:16:47, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
92:14:59, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
67:19:37, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
425:07:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
210:general notability guideline
47:Hi - I'm Girth Summit, and
496:
481:11:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
390:Mystery Science (company)
374:Mystery Science (company)
324:
38:04:52, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
397:or whether it should be
282:or whether it should be
154:
87:
329:
335:File:Mystery doug.png
332:Thanks for uploading
327:
204:(with a prefix of "
182:independent sources
168:moved to draftspace
444:Draft:Mystery Doug
432:Draft:Mystery Doug
430:Concern regarding
330:
198:central importance
340:claim of fair use
191:
487:
441:
385:
384:
326:
307:
304:
270:
269:
243:
240:
219:
216:
207:
185:
130:
127:
59:
56:
36:
34:
495:
494:
490:
489:
488:
486:
485:
484:
435:
414:
386:
382:
378:
357:. Thank you. --
322:
312:
305:
302:
299:
271:
267:
263:
248:
241:
238:
224:
217:
214:
205:
170:
135:
128:
125:
64:
57:
54:
45:
32:
26:
19:
12:
11:
5:
493:
491:
434:
428:
380:
379:
377:
372:Nomination of
370:
321:
318:
310:
265:
264:
262:
257:Nomination of
255:
254:
253:
246:
222:
169:
163:
162:
161:
146:
140:
133:
121:
109:
105:
70:
62:
44:
41:
28:Steven Walling
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
492:
483:
482:
478:
474:
469:
467:
462:
460:
456:
451:
449:
448:article space
445:
440:
433:
429:
427:
426:
422:
418:
413:
409:
406:
400:
396:
392:
391:
375:
371:
369:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
347:
345:
341:
337:
336:
319:
317:
316:
313:
308:
298:
294:
291:
285:
281:
277:
276:
260:
256:
252:
249:
244:
235:
231:
230:
229:
228:
225:
220:
211:
203:
199:
195:
194:verifiability
189:
183:
179:
175:
167:
164:
160:
156:
152:
147:
144:
141:
139:
136:
131:
122:
119:
115:
110:
106:
103:
99:
96:
95:
94:
93:
89:
85:
81:
78:
74:
73:behind them.
69:
68:
65:
60:
50:
49:administrator
42:
40:
39:
35:
29:
24:
16:
470:
463:
459:userfication
452:
436:
415:
410:
402:
388:
376:for deletion
350:
348:
333:
331:
300:
295:
287:
273:
261:for deletion
174:Mystery Doug
171:
166:Mystery Doug
151:Jjwilliamson
98:Jjwilliamson
84:Jjwilliamson
82:
79:
75:
71:
46:
20:
143:GirthSummit
43:Connection?
473:FireflyBot
275:Doug Peltz
259:Doug Peltz
202:draftspace
311:(blether)
247:(blether)
223:(blether)
134:(blether)
63:(blether)
351:articles
234:WP:NCORP
178:reliable
455:CSD G13
417:Mccapra
399:deleted
284:deleted
118:WP:PAID
116:and at
102:WP:PING
23:Dropbox
17:Welcome
306:Summit
242:Summit
218:Summit
206:Draft:
196:is of
129:Summit
58:Summit
359:B-bot
303:Girth
239:Girth
215:Girth
126:Girth
55:Girth
477:talk
466:here
421:talk
363:talk
155:talk
108:from
88:talk
33:talk
346:).
114:COI
479:)
468:.
450:.
423:)
401:.
365:)
286:.
184:.
180:,
157:)
90:)
30:•
25:!
475:(
419:(
361:(
328:⚠
190:)
188:?
186:(
153:(
86:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.