Knowledge

User talk:Jone Rohne Nester

Source đź“ť

985:
more content in this article (2 thirds) that would be cut out if merged because it would not be relevant to the shooting article. This song has existed for some time (over 2 decades) and sources have only become more available due to the shooting but also due to reports on right wing communities. Look if any editor thinks that the article ought to be deleted they are more then welcome to open that discussion and put it up for a vote. However this song/meme topic is notable in its own right and i've seen articles with much less sources and content survive. Best.
22: 469: 414: 233: 1010: 634: 1082: 341: 71: 547: 1058:. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. 833:
absolutely no weight, but that subject aside it gives the appearance that you nominated it as a grudge. I'd highly recommend you refrain from following Biwom's contributions if you two do indeed have a problem but I'll note that I don't see any substantial interactions between you two aside from Biwom's appropriate tagging of the article.
942:. Are you saying that i made it up? What do you mean as the sources are RS and i wrote it through those sourrces and also they are accessible for everyone. Also why a merger ? This is a song and popular meme on the internet among the right wing and it has a history. Can you elaborate on what you meant? Thanks. 965:
it's quite simple, you either create a page without connecting to the main event as basis of your argument(main subject of the page) or you merge the page as part of the main events. It seems that your article is purely based on the credibility of main events and it wouldn't stand alone. So it either
984:
is not a sufficient reason. I have linked the page to the page about the shooting. This song/meme is not a result of the shooting, but a cause. The song was a war tune during the wars of the 1990s that whipped up hatreds and has continued to do so many years after for the right wing. There is much
725:
for this link, I was not aware of it. I have nothing against it if that source would be removed and date of birth would be removed until someone will find more reliable source to verify that. P.S. I've also reverted your edit as it's not clear to me how did you come up with the conclusion that the
598:
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion
769:
Not sure what's your point here? You are more than welcome to go out there and find better sources instead of complaining on my page about the "quality" of the sources, which by the way are exactly the same ones as seen in majority of bios on Wiki. I've added sources that verify every single fact
832:
for deletion with a bogus rationale. You cannot claim no significance when this person is the first French female producer. I am not commenting on her notability in general but that statement, which is sourced and easily verifiable is enough that an argument the subject is not significant has
827:
is misguided. You should be commenting on the content and not the contributor, something you've been told several times. Nothing in your keep is an actual deletion argument or pertinent to the discussion at hand. I don't know what issues you and Biwom have but they are also irrelevant to the
83:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
353:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
874:
I'm not sure you're understanding what is being said to you - future comments like you've made on that AFD are likely to result in going to a drama board. That's also not a quote from me, as you'll note in the attribution. I certainly hope you'll heed that warning, though.
317:. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged 660:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
863:. I like it. It sort of tells you that you are insignificant and replacable. Which is kind of true and apply to all of us on Wiki. Today is you, tomorrow someone else. I'll treat your comment in exactly the same way. Thanks for your time, your comment noted 889:"Being said to you"? sounds kind of aggressive and very imperative. Then I guess see you in the future on drama board, no need to reiterate, I understand and as I've said your comment is noted, now if you don't mind I have some editing to do.... 485:
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
514: 579:, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read 966:
will be deleted or merged unless you can substantiate that the song alone somehow important (which I think it isn't) and by no means I'm saying that you've made it up but it just one way or the other. Thanks for stopping by
664:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
770:
I've wrote in the article, so where exactly do you see advertisiment? If you are unhappy with the sources such as the Mirror or the Guardian you can open a new discussion and I'll be happy to contribute there.
1125: 381: 111: 1109:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 365:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 95:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 321:. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 318: 281: 266: 1095: 458: 755:
If the only sources were of the quality of The Guardian, I doubt there would be any problem. Such high-quality sources are required. Why are the other sources there at all? --
430:
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
697: 407:
Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to post-1932 American politics and articles and content relating to living or recently deceased people
726:
article is written like an advertisiment while it has only a few sentences that are literally fact statements based on highly reliable sources such as
1025: 657: 646: 745: 576: 536: 517:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 461:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 39: 35: 1147: 395: 125: 196:, thanks for your feedback but I'm not sure what are you trying to say and how am I'm connected to the page you are referring to? thanks 298: 603:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 1143: 391: 250: 121: 1043:. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the 306: 1118: 556: 374: 104: 1130: 1051:
for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
1040: 584: 386: 286: 254: 116: 698:
Knowledge:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information
600: 495: 439: 302: 1048: 650: 314: 224: 48: 1044: 1032: 563: 310: 829: 816: 207:
You don't recall deleting the original version as "not notable" without any discussion at all? Short memory.
289:
is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means
171: 967: 890: 864: 771: 737: 294: 276: 197: 689: 1106: 981: 614: 527: 362: 92: 828:
discussion. Second, immediately prior to your comment, you went and nominated Biwom's recent creation,
880: 838: 733: 670: 213: 180: 1036: 990: 947: 927: 293:
administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the
290: 54: 641: 625: 595: 572: 540: 1089: 1047:
to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be
349: 79: 910:
Hi there! As a friendly reminder, please sign all your talk page comments with three tildes (
1137: 1102: 610: 522: 510: 475:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
454: 420:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
358: 88: 50: 21: 1117:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 684:
Hi Jone Rohne Nester. I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for
373:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 242:
it contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge. It does
144:
Hello Jone Rohne Nester. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of
103:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 876: 850: 834: 820: 666: 506: 499: 491: 487: 450: 443: 435: 431: 208: 191: 175: 145: 138: 692:. Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the 939:
Hi, i saw you placed a merge tag and also said "Can't objectively validate any of this"
1114: 792: 760: 705: 580: 370: 272: 262: 100: 468: 413: 232: 1110: 986: 960: 943: 915: 685: 366: 157: 96: 823:
previously. First, giving you the benefit of the doubt, I'll assume your comment at
1055: 1009: 727: 693: 1151: 1081: 1062: 994: 975: 951: 884: 842: 796: 764: 749: 709: 674: 618: 575:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under 530: 399: 340: 328: 215: 182: 161: 129: 70: 52: 599:
tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
1059: 325: 258: 1020:
Indefinite topic ban from blockchain and cryptocurrencies, broadly construed
788: 756: 720: 701: 148:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 855:
Thanks for your feedback. I'll quote your own words written on your page:
555:
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
153: 1121:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
377:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
107:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1099:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
590:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
269:. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a 696:
for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See
1134:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1024:
You have been sanctioned for continued promotional editing (see
857:"No need to give me the fire-and-brimstone warnings of your god" 781:
It's policy that poor sources shouldn't be used at all for BLPs.
481:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
426:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
1124:
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
380:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
110:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
246:
imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
55: 15: 605: 545: 1003:
You are topic banned from blockchain and cryptocurrencies
815:
Hi there. I wanted to give you some advice and reiterate
1093:
is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
1105:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
940: 824: 639:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
361:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
91:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
645:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
700:). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. -- 1016:The following sanction has been imposed on you: 577:section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion 553: 265:. The details of these sanctions are described 1031:This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an 305:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as 174:, huh? Just because you never heard of him? 1035:as authorised by the community's decision at 1018: 8: 505:For additional information, please see the 490:is in effect. Any administrator may impose 449:For additional information, please see the 434:is in effect. Any administrator may impose 1076: 731: 502:, when making edits related to the topic. 446:, when making edits related to the topic. 1026:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Dapp Life 658:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Dapp Life 347:Hello, Jone Rohne Nester. Voting in the 240:Please read this notification carefully, 77:Hello, Jone Rohne Nester. Voting in the 980:A stopover is always good. Nonetheless 557:the guide to writing your first article 494:on editors who do not strictly follow 438:on editors who do not strictly follow 1039:, and the procedure described by the 7: 1090:2019 Arbitration Committee elections 1054:You may appeal this sanction at the 350:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 80:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 647:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 601:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 562:You may want to consider using the 507:guidance on discretionary sanctions 451:guidance on discretionary sanctions 1073:ArbCom 2019 election voter message 784:The Daily Mirror is a poor source. 334:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 64:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 14: 656:The article will be discussed at 1080: 1008: 632: 467: 412: 339: 231: 69: 20: 1128:and submit your choices on the 787:I've cleaned up the article. -- 680:Famousbirthdays.com as a source 384:and submit your choices on the 114:and submit your choices on the 216:14:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC) 183:09:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC) 150:Not unambiguously promotional. 1: 1152:00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC) 1107:Knowledge arbitration process 531:19:31, 17 February 2019 (UTC) 400:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 363:Knowledge arbitration process 93:Knowledge arbitration process 1041:general sanctions guidelines 817:advice that was given to you 566:to help you create articles. 329:11:44, 24 October 2018 (UTC) 130:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 1056:administrators' noticeboard 585:Knowledge:FAQ/Organizations 1171: 1144:MediaWiki message delivery 1063:21:46, 16 March 2019 (UTC) 995:21:31, 16 March 2019 (UTC) 976:21:18, 16 March 2019 (UTC) 952:21:09, 16 March 2019 (UTC) 694:reliable sourcing criteria 500:page-specific restrictions 444:page-specific restrictions 392:MediaWiki message delivery 253:has authorised the use of 137:Speedy deletion declined: 122:MediaWiki message delivery 885:23:08, 1 March 2019 (UTC) 843:22:37, 1 March 2019 (UTC) 797:01:42, 2 March 2019 (UTC) 765:23:29, 1 March 2019 (UTC) 750:23:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC) 710:18:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC) 675:13:02, 1 March 2019 (UTC) 619:11:53, 1 March 2019 (UTC) 571:A tag has been placed on 257:for pages related to the 225:Decentralized application 162:07:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC) 1142:to your user talk page. 1033:uninvolved administrator 971: 894: 868: 775: 741: 686:biographical information 649:or whether it should be 201: 587:for more information. 511:Arbitration Committee's 488:discretionary sanctions 455:Arbitration Committee's 432:discretionary sanctions 1022: 606:deleting administrator 592:contest the nomination 581:the guidelines on spam 568: 550: 299:standards of behaviour 275:per twenty-four hours 1103:Arbitration Committee 1087:Hello! Voting in the 830:Christine Gouze-Rénal 549: 359:Arbitration Committee 89:Arbitration Committee 690:Yianni Charalambous 496:Knowledge's policies 440:Knowledge's policies 307:editing restrictions 295:purpose of Knowledge 1119:arbitration policy 551: 375:arbitration policy 251:community decision 105:arbitration policy 1158: 1157: 968:Jone Rohne Nester 891:Jone Rohne Nester 865:Jone Rohne Nester 772:Jone Rohne Nester 752: 738:Jone Rohne Nester 736:comment added by 596:visiting the page 287:General sanctions 255:general sanctions 198:Jone Rohne Nester 61: 60: 1162: 1141: 1084: 1077: 1012: 964: 930: 926: 923: 920: 913: 906:Signing comments 854: 724: 636: 635: 608: 548: 525: 471: 416: 343: 263:cryptocurrencies 235: 211: 195: 178: 177:The Pink Panther 73: 56: 24: 16: 1170: 1169: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1135: 1075: 1067: 1066: 1013: 1005: 958: 937: 928: 924: 921: 918: 911: 908: 848: 813: 718: 682: 637: 633: 630: 604: 569: 546: 544: 537:Speedy deletion 523: 520: 519: 472: 464: 463: 417: 409: 404: 403: 344: 336: 323: 322: 280:, as described 236: 228: 209: 189: 176: 169: 142: 134: 133: 74: 66: 57: 51: 29: 12: 11: 5: 1168: 1166: 1156: 1155: 1126:the candidates 1096:eligible users 1085: 1074: 1071: 1069: 1045:banning policy 1014: 1007: 1006: 1004: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 982:wp:idontlikeit 936: 933: 907: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 812: 809: 808: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 785: 782: 681: 678: 631: 629: 624:Nomination of 622: 564:Article Wizard 552: 543: 539:nomination of 534: 473: 466: 465: 418: 411: 410: 408: 405: 382:the candidates 345: 338: 337: 335: 332: 301:, or relevant 237: 230: 229: 227: 222: 221: 220: 219: 218: 168: 165: 141: 135: 112:the candidates 75: 68: 67: 65: 62: 59: 58: 53: 49: 47: 44: 43: 31: 30: 25: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1167: 1154: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1139: 1133: 1132: 1127: 1122: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1098: 1097: 1092: 1091: 1086: 1083: 1079: 1078: 1072: 1070: 1065: 1064: 1061: 1057: 1052: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1029: 1027: 1021: 1017: 1011: 1002: 996: 992: 988: 983: 979: 978: 977: 973: 969: 962: 956: 955: 954: 953: 949: 945: 941: 934: 932: 931: 917: 905: 896: 892: 888: 887: 886: 882: 878: 873: 872: 870: 866: 862: 858: 852: 847: 846: 845: 844: 840: 836: 831: 826: 822: 818: 810: 798: 794: 790: 786: 783: 780: 779: 777: 773: 768: 767: 766: 762: 758: 754: 753: 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 729: 722: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 707: 703: 699: 695: 691: 687: 679: 677: 676: 672: 668: 662: 659: 654: 652: 648: 644: 643: 627: 623: 621: 620: 616: 612: 607: 602: 597: 593: 588: 586: 582: 578: 574: 567: 565: 560: 558: 542: 538: 535: 533: 532: 529: 526: 518: 516: 512: 508: 503: 501: 497: 493: 489: 483: 482: 480: 470: 462: 460: 456: 452: 447: 445: 441: 437: 433: 428: 427: 425: 415: 406: 402: 401: 397: 393: 389: 388: 383: 378: 376: 372: 368: 364: 360: 355: 352: 351: 342: 333: 331: 330: 327: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 285: 283: 279: 278: 274: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 247: 245: 241: 234: 226: 223: 217: 214: 212: 206: 205: 203: 199: 193: 187: 186: 185: 184: 181: 179: 173: 166: 164: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 140: 136: 132: 131: 127: 123: 119: 118: 113: 108: 106: 102: 98: 94: 90: 85: 82: 81: 72: 63: 46: 45: 42: 41: 37: 33: 32: 28: 23: 18: 17: 1129: 1123: 1100: 1094: 1088: 1068: 1053: 1037:WP:GS/Crypto 1030: 1023: 1019: 1015: 938: 909: 860: 856: 814: 732:— Preceding 728:The Guardian 683: 663: 655: 640: 638: 628:for deletion 591: 589: 570: 561: 554: 521: 504: 484: 478: 476: 474: 448: 429: 423: 421: 419: 385: 379: 356: 348: 346: 324: 270: 248: 243: 239: 238: 170: 152:Thank you. 149: 143: 115: 109: 86: 78: 76: 34: 26: 1131:voting page 914:). Thanks! 611:Atlantic306 524:Doug Weller 387:voting page 277:restriction 172:Not notable 117:voting page 1115:topic bans 877:Praxidicae 861:Praxidicae 851:Praxidicae 835:Praxidicae 821:Ritchie333 717:Thank you 667:Praxidicae 371:topic bans 291:uninvolved 259:blockchain 210:TREKphiler 192:Trekphiler 101:topic bans 1111:site bans 642:Dapp Life 626:Dapp Life 573:Dapp Life 541:Dapp Life 513:decision 498:, or the 492:sanctions 457:decision 442:, or the 436:sanctions 367:site bans 167:Hinesight 97:site bans 987:Resnjari 961:Resnjari 944:Resnjari 916:Drewmutt 825:this afd 746:contribs 734:unsigned 509:and the 477:It does 453:and the 422:It does 303:policies 27:Archives 1138:NoACEMM 1049:blocked 651:deleted 811:Advice 315:blocks 297:, our 273:revert 1060:MER-C 326:MER-C 313:, or 1148:talk 1101:The 991:talk 972:talk 948:talk 929:talk 895:talk 881:talk 869:talk 839:talk 793:talk 789:Ronz 776:talk 761:talk 757:Ronz 742:talk 721:Ronz 706:talk 702:Ronz 671:talk 615:talk 609:. 583:and 528:talk 515:here 459:here 396:talk 357:The 319:here 311:bans 282:here 271:one 267:here 261:and 202:talk 158:talk 146:DYJA 139:DYJA 126:talk 87:The 1028:). 957:Hi 922:^ᴥ^ 912:~~~ 819:by 688:in 594:by 479:not 424:not 244:not 188:Hi 154:Mz7 1150:) 1140:}} 1136:{{ 1113:, 993:) 974:) 950:) 935:Hi 883:) 871:) 859:- 841:) 795:) 778:) 763:) 748:) 744:• 730:? 708:) 673:) 653:. 617:) 398:) 390:. 369:, 309:, 284:. 249:A 204:) 160:) 128:) 120:. 99:, 38:, 1146:( 989:( 970:( 963:: 959:@ 946:( 925:) 919:( 897:) 893:( 879:( 867:( 853:: 849:@ 837:( 791:( 774:( 759:( 740:( 723:: 719:@ 704:( 669:( 613:( 559:. 394:( 200:( 194:: 190:@ 156:( 124:( 40:2 36:1

Index


1
2

2017 Arbitration Committee elections
Arbitration Committee
Knowledge arbitration process
site bans
topic bans
arbitration policy
the candidates
voting page
MediaWiki message delivery
talk
18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
DYJA
DYJA
Mz7
talk
07:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Not notable
The Pink Panther

09:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Trekphiler
Jone Rohne Nester
talk
TREKphiler

14:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑