1207:). I see the article on Indigenous Australians as it stands already states: "The proportion of Aboriginal adults married (de facto or de jure) to non-Aboriginal spouses has increased to 74% according to the 2011 census, up from 71% in 2006, 64% in 1996, 51% in 1991 and 46% in 1986.". Given the sensibilities involved, I'd be happy to take any proposed edits concerning this contentious subject to the talk page in the first instance from now on. All in all it's not as bad as its being made to sound is it? If block evasion is the only substantial issue. If I was ever blocked before. It was that long ago now I honestly don't recall anything about it. In my jurisdiction, even criminal convictions get expunged after ten years. I've already seen that it seems like anyone who is prepared to admit Australian aborigines are and will keep integrating into the host culture are in for a very tough slog on wikipedia, even with all the references in the world behind you. It seems remarkable to me to find census figures for the exogamy rate in the article on Indigenous Australians at all. There's no POV pushing going on here. What about if I give an undertaking to do all these things I have said and sign in from this sole account and I be allowed to continue my good work? You can really see that some of these articles I have spruced up really were poverty stricken before I found them, and all this time I've donated to wikipedia was worth money. All I can say is, I did create one identity for my PC. And then on my laptop, I sign in as Jodyrootes. I don't know why I started doing that. And now that I think of it, there could have been one other account, but the issue may have been I didnt make the alias memorable enough. Anyhow, I propose to use this one exclusively from now on. So this is a repeat my previous unblock request. I'd like a non Australian to entertain this unblock request please. I think this is all a bit political because of the wikipedia article I had input into on the Eureka Jack, which had a mountain of sources, and which has now been taken down and will be missed. Surely not! That was one of wikipedias best efforts! Being accused of of a conflict if interest is a bit predictable isnt it? I'm not a member of any orgnisations that might give rise to a conflict. I'm just a student of pure vexillologicial science. I invite you to look at the recent revisions that have been made to the Eureka flag article, its a lot poorer now is not? Thats blatant politically motivated moderating from Nick-D. Who was actually the person who banned Glorious revolution in the first instance was they not? Some of the regular editors of those two articles didnt mind my input and they even improved on it as did your image editors with some of the artwork and now its just gone??? Tell me in biased instead!
1599:
at all the content I have added since 2013. It was all done in the usual way you'd expect of a wikipedia editor acting in good faith. The Eureka Jack article even made it into the newspapers. If I keep on keeping on like that, using only this account from now on, would it really be so horrible if I continued my work? I believe that since 2013 I havent been involved in one edit war. I've started up discussions on several talk pages. As I have said, in my jurisdiction criminal convictions even drop off your record after ten years. It just seems a bit unfair that Nick-D can totally savage the Eureka flag article, but leave bits and pieces I added here and there, but minus the sources I gave, and he doesn't get kicked up the bum and I do? You can really see from the revisions he made it was politically motivated. When are you going to sanction Nick-D for that? Do whatever you want to do. Anyone who saw it before can see it's a poverty stricken article on the Eureka flag you have now.
532:
previous claims that only red ensigns are depicted in the official portrait, the field of the flag flying vertically in the second position in the order of precedence is predominantly blue, and may either be shown as a Union Jack or a blue ensign. One of the flags flying from the flag poles standing vertically in front of the building also has something of a blue streak. Both artists have made small errors in detail, as Power has positioned one of the westernmost horizontal facade poles as turned 90 degrees to the front and depicted facing the crowd instead. Other photographs taken that day also appear to show a large Union Jack flying horizontally from another, lower facade pole also at the western end. However neither of these two features are in evidence in the lithograph as one would expect from the north westerly perspective chosen by the unknown artist.
1615:
mentioned in an
Australian newspaper article and all. Even if you dont uphold this request, can we put the Eureka Jack article back? And return all the content Nick-D took out of the Eureka flag article? He even left what I wrote about the Roll up banner but without the sources I provided! Wouldnt anyone else get kicked up the bum for doing that? Thats over kill dont you reckon? He didnt even reverse each and every one of my edits. Other editors even got in there and cleaned up some of my contributions to those two articles after I put them up there. It's not like Knowledge does not have a bit of a reputation for partisan, capricious moderators. Wishing I had a conflict of interest doesnt make it so. It's wikipedias loss.
1203:
and I see no examples of such edits have been cited. I'll admit, I could have truncated down some of what I have written even more, but is that a banning offence? They were basically all quality additions. The Eureka flag article in particular is light years ahead of where it was. There has been articles in the mainstream media citing the demographic threat indigenous
Australians are facing, so there's nothing new or novel in that either, and would it be so horrible if there was just a one world race one day??? (see here
375:
1363:
into
Jodyrootes, so I set up JohnWayneCourier. Once again, I invite you to look at Nick-D's revisions to the Eureka flag article. Whose biased? Why leave some content I contributed and not excise it all? Was it really neccesary to delete the Eureka Jack article which had around 200 sources when multiple editors had been involved? He's the only editor who seems to have a problem with that content.
1429:
1277:
1117:
31:
761:
697:
1046:
536:
George on the Union Jack is red and of darker shade that the blue of St Andrew's Cross. It is interesting to note that the blue on the Union Jack matches the shade of
Australian flag which, to my eye means that the Australian flag has a blue field not red which would have matched the shade of the red St George's Cross.”
540:
Australian flag variants were present on this occasion. However the choice would likely have been one Power - who left behind the words “It was decided .. flags in red” - would have made alone, and the fact that there was no comment when the official rendition was unveiled is also considered revealing.
1514:
Well if this is what goes on I'm happy to stay away. But is it really not possible we have have a finite ban? In any event, can we restore the Eureka Jack article? It was mentioned in a newspaper article. It really was a sterling effort. And can we restore the content to the Eureka flag article? He's
539:
The 1927 mystery deepens according to other corroboration as to the presence of red ensigns, with a correspondent for The West
Australian reporting that: "The sunlight streamed through the crimson of drooping flags”. When one binds all the available evidence together, this strongly suggests that both
1537:
No. You must address the original reasons for your block in a way that makes it completely clear that the issues will not happen again. Since subsequent issues like legal threats and racist nonsense have popped up, there is quite a bit to account for. The bigger problem is that you've simply lied
1635:
If you were to unban me, I could undo all those revisions, and we could take it from there. If Nick-D didn't like it, we could argue it around on the talk page. So as long as I continued to edit in the usual way, there'd be no problem. Everyone would be a winner. Otherwise, as I say, good luck with
1614:
What about it indeed? Even if it was me, I cant remember back that far. People grow up. Cant we just start over? Look at the state of the Eureka flag article now its gone backwards. And the Eureka Jack article which was one of wikipedias best efforts and will be missed, with the article having been
1598:
The only substantial issue seems to be whether I'm glorious revolution or not, and not the way I have conducted myself anytime recently. I'm sorry I cant help you there but I just dont remember back that far. But even if I look to you like I was blocked previously. Cant we just start over now? Look
1515:
even left some of my content about the Roll up banner but without the sources I provided! Wouldnt anyone else get kicked up the bum for doing that? There were other editors involved in these then just me. Otherwise, good luck with preserving some of these third or fourth rate encyclopedia articles.
1202:
I'm just trying to make a contribution. I'm a newbie. What did I do wrong? Instead of this, why don't you give me some constructive advice? I'm happy to be reasonable and talk about these edits I proposed on the relevant talk pages. It was all sourced material. There's nothing opinionated about it,
1362:
Can we have a non
Australian adjudicate on this one? Cant we let the ban expire one day? Is that really a big issue when as I read it you are allowed multiple accounts in any case? I let my computers worry about remembering passwords. Originally I was away from home with my laptop and couldn't log
884:
and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the
535:
Upon microscopic examination, the only hard evidence in at least one of the photographs taken that day seems to show a blue ensign draped behind the Union Jack. John
Christian Vaughan, vexillographer and former CEO of the Royal Australian Historical Society, has ventured to say: “The Cross of St
531:
The seemingly unresolvable controversy over the type of
Australian flags used at the 1927 opening ceremony of the second provisional parliament house in Canberra is now one step closer to being solved. The latest research being carried out by the Australian Flag Society shows that, contrary to
1015:
When placing a new request at the graphics lab, please be sure to give it a title in the field marked "Subject/headline" so that it creates a new section. When you don't do so, it appends the body of the request to the last existing section, and makes navigation difficult. Thanks.
726:
or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our
1666:
Perhaps Nick-D can explain why he removed the Eureka Jack article and removed all that sourced content from the Eureka flag article? I think those edits were politically motivated. The Eureka flag article used to be a hug dinger compared to what it is now.
864:.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Knowledge. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at
718:
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
809:.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of
793:, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
1385:
Multiple accounts are allowed in some cases, but using an alternate account to evade a block is not. Neither is using two accounts to agree with yourself and create an impression of consensus when it's just you.
418:
The research originated with the
Australian Flag Society. It's hitting inboxes as we speak. I think it would be only a matter of time until a newspaper gets onto it. Something like that can't stay a secret
1688:
Due to your excessive use of the unblock template I have removed your talk page access. There are other users who need their blocks reviewed and you have already been reviewed by several people.
1538:
many times before in unblock requests; that will make it very difficult to appraoch the issues in a convincing way. Silly nonsense like "I can't remember back that far" is just a non-starter.
484:
The genie is out of the bottle now. Let's talk about it on the talk page. I think the
Australian Flag Society is a good enough source even before one of their media releases gets written up.
948:
FYI. The reference tags in articles come immediately after the punctuation mark ~ not after a space. Please do this from now on as it is tiresome correcting them. Thank you.
331:! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there!
39:
23:
314:
1576:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
1420:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
1268:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
313:
443:, galleries are discouraged and the edit clearly is based on personal analysis by a Knowledge editor, regardless of where it may have originated. Such
239:
Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The
985:
918:
839:
664:
835:
830:
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you
732:
1692:
1469:
1317:
1157:
60:
790:
750:
391:
981:
914:
660:
1561:
1405:
1253:
1204:
1095:
842:. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Knowledge, it still needs to comply with the other
199:
621:. Use indenting and when signing your name, sign at the end of your post, rather than using a separate line just for your signature. --
170:
843:
248:
1464:
1312:
1152:
978:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
911:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
657:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
614:
383:
379:
98:
242:
525:
You are quite wrong about that. I'm on their email list and here is their latest offering (I'm not a member or anything):
1234:
770:
501:
The Australian flag society isn't a source for the edits that you made. Most of what you wrote was original research. --
162:
1083:
1441:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1289:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1230:
1129:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
886:
211:
1442:
1290:
1130:
1054:
824:
1483:
1436:
1331:
1284:
1171:
1124:
777:
740:
336:
154:
731:
for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see
970:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
903:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
649:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
1069:
1065:
1061:
869:
723:
1025:
953:
890:
633:
577:
513:
470:
406:
142:
49:
881:
786:
754:
708:
690:
846:
to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the
294:
56:
45:
1205:
http://www.news.com.au/national/more-aborigines-entering-mixed-marriages/story-e6frfkvr-1225696982117
1103:
798:
789:, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the
728:
134:
847:
736:
704:
283:
126:
865:
856:
343:
332:
328:
885:
speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
447:
is not permitted on Knowledge. Everything added to Knowledge must be supported by third party,
1696:
1588:
1238:
1018:
1001:
949:
934:
680:
622:
566:
559:
502:
459:
395:
387:
354:
261:
1570:
1414:
1262:
1089:
838:. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see
1670:
1645:
1619:
1600:
1516:
1447:
1364:
1295:
1208:
1135:
1099:
618:
594:
565:
Fact tags are for completely unsourced content, not for challenging existing citations. --
487:
423:
87:
1544:
1391:
802:
712:
1082:. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
1079:
992:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
925:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
861:
806:
671:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
654:
552:
528:“The 1927 Mystery Unravels” (12 July 2014) 2(1) Flag Breaking News (ISSN 2203-2118)
997:
993:
975:
930:
926:
676:
672:
448:
444:
350:
1636:
preserving some of these third or four rate encyclopedia entries. I tried my best.
374:
30:
971:
904:
650:
821:. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators
455:
did not add anything, it simply restored thesame gallery and original research.
247:
1064:
that was created to violate Knowledge policy. Note that multiple accounts are
251:
button, on the tool bar above Knowledge's text editing window, also does this.
1539:
1387:
68:
67:
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to
769:
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
1701:
1678:
1653:
1627:
1608:
1593:
1551:
1524:
1395:
1372:
1243:
1216:
1107:
1031:
1005:
957:
938:
893:
744:
684:
639:
602:
583:
519:
495:
476:
431:
412:
358:
299:
1045:
241:
876:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
908:
1237:. Given this fact the sock puppetry block is entirely appropriate.
1229:
Your unblock request makes it obvious you are the same person as
349:
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend,
258:
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the
1040:
1427:
1275:
1115:
834:
verify that externally by one of the processes explained at
759:
695:
233:
192:
119:
80:
386:
of published material to articles as you apparently did to
711:, and it appears to include material copied directly from
59:– I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the
1558:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1402:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1250:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1578:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1422:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1270:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
854:
It covers a topic on which we already have an article -
1587:
Australian. What about the Gloriousrevolution account?
1497:
1493:
1487:
1478:
1474:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1345:
1341:
1335:
1326:
1322:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1185:
1181:
1175:
1166:
1162:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1078:, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
974:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
907:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
785:
Hello, and welcome to Knowledge. This is a notice that
653:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
563:
456:
452:
440:
707:. I have performed a web search with the contents of
548:
Please do not remove citations and replace them with
1435:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1283:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1123:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1691:If you wish to seek further review you can use the
803:
http://www.nethelper.com/article/Lambing_Flat_riots
722:If substantial content is duplicated and it is not
713:
http://www.nethelper.com/article/Lambing_Flat_riots
55:If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at
966:Disambiguation link notification for December 28
899:Disambiguation link notification for December 12
862:section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion
807:section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion
767:
645:Disambiguation link notification for December 5
166:– a summary of Knowledge's most important rules
138:– quick reference on Knowledge's mark-up codes
44:I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to
8:
174:– a thorough step-by-step guide to Knowledge
48:. As a first step, you may wish to read the
305:Jodyrootes, you are invited to the Teahouse
394:for all of your contributions. Thank you.
840:Knowledge:Requesting copyright permission
836:Knowledge:Donating copyrighted materials
733:Knowledge:Donating copyrighted materials
325:! Thanks for contributing to Knowledge.
146:– an overview of Knowledge's foundations
1693:Knowledge:Unblock Ticket Request System
1583:Let me make something very clear, I am
771:the guide to writing your first article
158:– a Wizard to help you create articles
7:
1662:Euerka Jack and Eureka flag articles
1094:below. However, you should read the
887:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
868:, or to discuss new information at
776:You may want to consider using the
130:– a guide on where to ask questions
69:the world's largest encyclopedia...
703:This is an automated message from
14:
613:Please familiarise yourself with
1044:
589:Sorry about that I'll reedit it.
373:
312:
246:
240:
29:
615:Knowledge:Talk page guidelines
1:
1032:20:16, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
1006:09:00, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
958:06:56, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
939:09:06, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
215:– Knowledge's hub of activity
203:– a guide on how you can help
1235:User talk:Gloriousrevolution
894:08:15, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
791:criteria for speedy deletion
780:to help you create articles.
745:08:09, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
685:08:59, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
341:
1702:05:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
1679:03:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
1654:04:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
1628:03:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
1609:04:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
1594:03:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
1552:04:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
1525:04:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
1439:, who declined the request.
1396:03:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
1373:03:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
1287:, who declined the request.
1244:03:27, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
1217:03:09, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
1127:, who declined the request.
1108:17:23, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
451:. The change that you made
61:New contributors' help page
1717:
1231:User talk:JohnWayneCourier
1080:may be reverted or deleted
310:
1562:guide to appealing blocks
1406:guide to appealing blocks
1254:guide to appealing blocks
1096:guide to appealing blocks
813:, but not as a source of
797:It appears to be a clear
640:12:42, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
603:04:05, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
584:04:00, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
520:15:42, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
496:15:37, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
477:15:35, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
432:15:33, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
413:15:28, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
359:01:17, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
200:Contributing to Knowledge
1674:
1649:
1623:
1604:
1520:
1368:
1212:
1092:|Your reason here ~~~~}}
819:say it in your own words
817:. This part is crucial:
598:
491:
427:
300:14:08, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
279:good luck, and have fun.
75:Finding your way around:
1233:who also appears to be
870:the article's talk page
844:policies and guidelines
1432:
1280:
1120:
1053:This account has been
878:contest the nomination
782:
764:
700:
163:The simplified ruleset
22:Hello Jodyrootes, and
1484:change block settings
1431:
1332:change block settings
1279:
1172:change block settings
1119:
1068:, but using them for
1027:Tell me all about it.
763:
699:
143:Knowledge's 5 pillars
40:Welcome to Knowledge!
25:Welcome to Knowledge!
1037:Blocked indefinitely
994:opt-out instructions
927:opt-out instructions
825:blocked from editing
735:for the procedure.)
673:opt-out instructions
296:(tell Luke off here)
99:Department directory
1086:by adding the text
787:Lambing Flat Banner
755:Lambing Flat Banner
709:Lambing Flat Banner
691:Lambing Flat Banner
558:tags as you did at
337:I'm a Teahouse host
1433:
1281:
1121:
984:• Join us at the
917:• Join us at the
866:Lambing Flat riots
857:Lambing Flat riots
765:
701:
663:• Join us at the
439:As I indicated in
378:Please do not add
344:Visit the Teahouse
228:Additional tips...
171:Guide to Knowledge
1113:
1112:
1084:appeal this block
1028:
989:
922:
891:Narutolovehinata5
882:visiting the page
668:
562:while logged out.
560:Flag of Australia
445:original research
441:this edit summary
388:Flag of Australia
380:original research
366:
365:
361:
274:
273:
223:
222:
187:How you can help:
182:
181:
109:
108:
88:Table of contents
1708:
1684:Talk page access
1575:
1569:
1549:
1542:
1503:
1501:
1490:
1472:
1470:deleted contribs
1430:
1419:
1413:
1351:
1349:
1338:
1320:
1318:deleted contribs
1278:
1267:
1261:
1191:
1189:
1178:
1160:
1158:deleted contribs
1118:
1093:
1048:
1041:
1030:
1026:
1023:
979:
912:
801:infringement of
762:
729:copyright policy
698:
658:
629:
626:
573:
570:
557:
551:
509:
506:
466:
463:
449:reliable sources
402:
399:
390:. Please cite a
377:
348:
346:
327:Be our guest at
316:
309:
308:
292:
289:
286:
250:
244:
234:
212:Community portal
193:
120:
81:
33:
28:
26:
1716:
1715:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1686:
1664:
1581:
1573:
1567:
1566:, then use the
1555:
1545:
1540:
1528:
1491:
1481:
1467:
1450:
1443:blocking policy
1428:
1425:
1417:
1411:
1410:, then use the
1399:
1376:
1339:
1329:
1315:
1298:
1291:blocking policy
1276:
1273:
1265:
1259:
1258:, then use the
1247:
1220:
1179:
1169:
1155:
1138:
1131:blocking policy
1116:
1087:
1039:
1019:
1017:
1013:
986:DPL WikiProject
968:
946:
919:DPL WikiProject
901:
783:
760:
758:
751:Speedy deletion
696:
694:
665:DPL WikiProject
647:
636:
627:
624:
611:
580:
571:
568:
555:
549:
546:
516:
507:
504:
473:
464:
461:
409:
400:
397:
392:reliable source
384:novel syntheses
371:
362:
347:
342:
307:
302:
290:
287:
284:
275:
230:
224:
189:
183:
116:
110:
77:
34:
24:
21:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1714:
1712:
1685:
1682:
1663:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1617:
1616:
1556:
1535:
1531:Decline reason
1512:
1508:Request reason
1505:
1426:
1400:
1383:
1379:Decline reason
1360:
1356:Request reason
1353:
1274:
1248:
1227:
1223:Decline reason
1200:
1196:Request reason
1193:
1114:
1111:
1110:
1049:
1038:
1035:
1012:
1009:
967:
964:
945:
944:Reference tags
942:
900:
897:
874:
873:
852:
778:Article Wizard
766:
757:
753:nomination of
748:
737:CorenSearchBot
705:CorenSearchBot
693:
688:
646:
643:
634:
610:
607:
606:
605:
591:
590:
578:
545:
542:
523:
522:
514:
482:
481:
480:
479:
471:
421:
420:
407:
370:
367:
364:
363:
326:
319:
317:
306:
303:
272:
271:
268:
267:
254:
253:
252:
232:
226:
221:
220:
217:
216:
206:
205:
204:
191:
185:
180:
179:
176:
175:
167:
159:
155:Article wizard
149:
148:
147:
139:
131:
118:
112:
107:
106:
103:
102:
93:
92:
91:
79:
73:
65:
35:
20:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1713:
1704:
1703:
1700:
1699:
1694:
1689:
1683:
1681:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1668:
1661:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1596:
1595:
1592:
1591:
1586:
1580:
1579:
1572:
1565:
1563:
1554:
1553:
1550:
1548:
1543:
1534:
1532:
1527:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1511:
1509:
1504:
1499:
1495:
1489:
1485:
1480:
1476:
1471:
1466:
1462:
1461:global blocks
1458:
1457:active blocks
1454:
1449:
1444:
1440:
1438:
1437:administrator
1424:
1423:
1416:
1409:
1407:
1398:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1382:
1380:
1375:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1359:
1357:
1352:
1347:
1343:
1337:
1333:
1328:
1324:
1319:
1314:
1310:
1309:global blocks
1306:
1305:active blocks
1302:
1297:
1292:
1288:
1286:
1285:administrator
1272:
1271:
1264:
1257:
1255:
1246:
1245:
1242:
1241:
1236:
1232:
1226:
1224:
1219:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1199:
1197:
1192:
1187:
1183:
1177:
1173:
1168:
1164:
1159:
1154:
1150:
1149:global blocks
1146:
1145:active blocks
1142:
1137:
1132:
1128:
1126:
1125:administrator
1109:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1091:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1072:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1056:
1050:
1047:
1043:
1042:
1036:
1034:
1033:
1029:
1024:
1022:
1010:
1008:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
990:
987:
983:
977:
973:
965:
963:
960:
959:
955:
951:
943:
941:
940:
936:
932:
928:
923:
920:
916:
910:
906:
898:
896:
895:
892:
888:
883:
879:
871:
867:
863:
859:
858:
853:
851:
849:
845:
841:
837:
833:
827:
826:
820:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
795:
794:
792:
788:
781:
779:
774:
772:
756:
752:
749:
747:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
725:
724:public domain
720:
716:
714:
710:
706:
692:
689:
687:
686:
682:
678:
674:
669:
666:
662:
656:
655:Jack Crawford
652:
644:
642:
641:
637:
631:
630:
620:
617:, especially
616:
608:
604:
600:
596:
593:
592:
588:
587:
586:
585:
581:
575:
574:
564:
561:
554:
543:
541:
537:
533:
529:
526:
521:
517:
511:
510:
500:
499:
498:
497:
493:
489:
485:
478:
474:
468:
467:
457:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
429:
425:
417:
416:
415:
414:
410:
404:
403:
393:
389:
385:
381:
376:
368:
360:
356:
352:
345:
340:
338:
334:
330:
324:
318:
315:
311:
304:
301:
298:
297:
293:
281:
280:
270:
265:
264:
263:
257:
256:
255:
249:
243:
238:
237:
236:
235:
231:
229:
219:
214:
213:
209:
208:
207:
202:
201:
197:
196:
195:
194:
190:
188:
178:
173:
172:
168:
165:
164:
160:
157:
156:
152:
151:
150:
145:
144:
140:
137:
136:
132:
129:
128:
124:
123:
122:
121:
117:
115:
105:
101:
100:
96:
95:
94:
90:
89:
85:
84:
83:
82:
78:
76:
71:
70:
64:
62:
58:
53:
51:
47:
43:
42:
41:
32:
27:
16:
1697:
1690:
1687:
1669:
1665:
1618:
1597:
1589:
1584:
1582:
1577:
1559:
1557:
1546:
1536:
1530:
1529:
1513:
1507:
1506:
1479:creation log
1446:
1434:
1421:
1403:
1401:
1384:
1378:
1377:
1361:
1355:
1354:
1327:creation log
1294:
1282:
1269:
1251:
1249:
1239:
1228:
1222:
1221:
1201:
1195:
1194:
1167:creation log
1134:
1122:
1075:
1071:illegitimate
1070:
1057:indefinitely
1052:
1051:
1021:MjolnirPants
1020:
1014:
991:
976:Vinegar Hill
969:
961:
950:Afterwriting
947:
924:
902:
877:
875:
855:
831:
829:
822:
818:
814:
810:
784:
775:
768:
721:
717:
702:
670:
648:
623:
612:
567:
547:
538:
534:
530:
527:
524:
503:
486:
483:
460:
422:
396:
372:
329:the Teahouse
322:
320:
295:
278:
277:Jodyrootes,
276:
269:
260:
259:
227:
225:
218:
210:
198:
186:
184:
177:
169:
161:
153:
141:
133:
125:
113:
111:
104:
97:
86:
74:
72:
66:
57:my talk page
54:
50:Introduction
38:
37:
36:
1062:sock puppet
972:Eureka Jack
905:Eureka Jack
811:information
651:Eureka Jack
266:is for you.
1671:Jodyrootes
1646:Jodyrootes
1620:Jodyrootes
1601:Jodyrootes
1517:Jodyrootes
1475:filter log
1448:Jodyrootes
1365:Jodyrootes
1323:filter log
1296:Jodyrootes
1209:Jodyrootes
1163:filter log
1136:Jodyrootes
1100:PhilKnight
996:. Thanks,
929:. Thanks,
675:. Thanks,
609:Talk pages
595:Jodyrootes
488:Jodyrootes
424:Jodyrootes
323:Jodyrootes
135:Cheatsheet
114:Need help?
1560:read the
1494:checkuser
1453:block log
1404:read the
1342:checkuser
1301:block log
1252:read the
1182:checkuser
1141:block log
980:Read the
913:Read the
848:help desk
815:sentences
799:copyright
659:Read the
544:Citations
369:July 2014
127:Questions
1465:contribs
1313:contribs
1153:contribs
1074:reasons
823:will be
619:WP:TPYES
419:forever.
333:Hajatvrc
1698:Chillum
1590:Chillum
1571:unblock
1488:unblock
1415:unblock
1336:unblock
1263:unblock
1240:Chillum
1176:unblock
1098:first.
1090:unblock
1066:allowed
1055:blocked
998:DPL bot
962:Sorry!
931:DPL bot
860:. (See
805:. (See
677:DPL bot
351:HostBot
262:Sandbox
17:Welcome
1547:(talk)
1076:is not
1011:Advice
909:Denovo
628:Legend
625:Aussie
572:Legend
569:Aussie
508:Legend
505:Aussie
465:Legend
462:Aussie
401:Legend
398:Aussie
1564:first
1408:first
1256:first
1060:as a
1675:talk
1650:talk
1624:talk
1605:talk
1541:Kuru
1521:talk
1392:talk
1388:Huon
1369:talk
1213:talk
1104:talk
1002:talk
954:talk
935:talk
832:must
741:talk
715:.
681:talk
599:talk
553:fact
492:talk
453:here
428:talk
355:talk
285:Luke
46:stay
1585:not
1498:log
1445:).
1346:log
1293:).
1186:log
1133:).
982:FAQ
915:FAQ
889:.
880:by
661:FAQ
382:or
321:Hi
245:or
1695:.
1677:)
1652:)
1626:)
1607:)
1574:}}
1568:{{
1533::
1523:)
1510::
1492:•
1486:•
1482:•
1477:•
1473:•
1468:•
1463:•
1459:•
1455:•
1418:}}
1412:{{
1394:)
1381::
1371:)
1358::
1340:•
1334:•
1330:•
1325:•
1321:•
1316:•
1311:•
1307:•
1303:•
1266:}}
1260:{{
1225::
1215:)
1198::
1180:•
1174:•
1170:•
1165:•
1161:•
1156:•
1151:•
1147:•
1143:•
1106:)
1088:{{
1004:)
956:)
937:)
828:.
743:)
683:)
638:)
601:)
582:)
556:}}
550:{{
518:)
494:)
475:)
458:--
430:)
411:)
357:)
339:)
291:94
288:no
282:–
63:.
52:.
1673:(
1648:(
1622:(
1603:(
1519:(
1502:)
1500:)
1496:(
1451:(
1390:(
1367:(
1350:)
1348:)
1344:(
1299:(
1211:(
1190:)
1188:)
1184:(
1139:(
1102:(
1000:(
988:.
952:(
933:(
921:.
872:.
850:.
773:.
739:(
679:(
667:.
635:✉
632:(
597:(
579:✉
576:(
515:✉
512:(
490:(
472:✉
469:(
426:(
408:✉
405:(
353:(
335:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
