Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:JoeJShmo

Source 📝

141:. His stand up shows have been cancelled because of threats of violence against him because of his views, and perhaps also because he is Jewish. I thought, if he can be brave like that, and pay the price, maybe I can do something small like make a meaningful user page. BTW, I am being stalked. I had a slightly threatening visit on my talk page from Nableezy, who asked me to explain what I meant by "Knowledge (XXG) Gestapo," which I mentioned here. I did not know I had to explain myself to anyone in private conversations I might have on talk pages. I told him it was obviously just a joke. Everyone knows Knowledge (XXG) is the free-est, most democratic and open forum for discovering the truth. Stay well. 1207:
completely irrelevant to the arguments he was making, and that I was agreeing to. I then made the point that the tactic he was arguing against is commonly used to against editors with a right-leaning POV. I was referencing such a POV generally, not specific to PIA. Please explain your reasons for characterizing this as a violation more clearly. Or perhaps you misread my intentions, in which case I welcome you to remove the block.
1090: 1348:
with the conflict itself. I will also note your message to the user there, in which you characterize a discussion of the potential of appealing a topic ban as falling under the topic ban. If you truly believe that, I'm afraid I have little chance of helping you see any error you may have made here. However, I'll leave this comment here for the record.
266:
comment, I'll just rewrite it to address your concerns. Also, your raising of ECR is entirely moot as: 1. I am EC and 2. I am under the impression that ECR doesn't apply to user spaces. For the record, I didn't realize the topic ban extended to talk pages, as I assumed that was exempt subject to the same rules as ECR being inapplicable to user space.
1347:
If a single edit is enough than the point is moot. However, for the record, the first diff did not fall under the topic ban as I explained above, and neither did the third diff, which is obvious. Discussing the oversized presence of a certain admin in the IA space of Knowledge (XXG) has nothing to do
1165:
regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important
87:
I just looked through all the bullying you have been subjected to from the Knowledge (XXG) gestapo, and want to commend your incredible ability to keep your cool. Bravo. I was threatened today with an AE, and fixed my rant (I admit it was a rant) to hopefully comply with the bizarre restrictions that
1206:
I see you're referring to a certain comment I left on a user's talk page. That comment was in reference to arguments being made against users being banned largely based off vague references to their block log. The fact that the editor making the arguments had been dragged to AE in regards to PIA was
265:
I don't know whether it's common practice to consider giving advice to other editors in following EC guidelines as violating a topic ban, in fact I didn't even consider that a possibility seeing to how illogical that would be, but I strongly suspect it isn't. If you tell me it is, I won't restore my
155:
Wow. Kudos to Barry Weiss and to others like him. Mattisyahu comes to mind, his shows also got canceled because he's pro Israel. It seems to be a common tactic of that side to stifle dissenting speech and shut down voices they don't like. I suppose the truth hurts; it can be scary to realize how sad
103:
Thank you! It's nice to see a friendly face in this cold place. I just took a look at your edit history- I'm impressed by what you've managed to do. Very accurate description of what I've been put up against. The hypocrisy and double standards are hardly even subtle. "Eisav soneh es yaakov"- they'll
485:
Also, can someone clarify why the practice is apparently to treat such a topic ban as applying to userspace if the Committee thought it logical to exempt userspace from the conflict area in regards to regular PIA restrictions? If this is because of the 'broadly construed' language, I'd ask the same
338:
Upon further inspection I take issue with the breadth of your removal. I cannot in good faith seriously construe linking the rules of ARB on the conflict and informing the user of the 1RR rule as falling under the spirit of the topic ban. Do you have reason to believe this is common practice or is
1423:
just saw your comment on the crypto request. I am actually EC (just subject to a topic ban in IA) and am fully able to edit in the crypto space. You've misread my intentions here, and I'd appreciate if you struck the end of that comment and clarified. I raised the request because I thought those
156:
it is that one has filled the vacuum of meaning in their life with a fallacious cause who's roots can often be traced back to common anti-Semitism. And your last sentence made me lol! All the best, don't lose heart. The truth is on our side, after all.
644:
a specific part of the edit was in fact in violation of a ban. And I'm tired of your characterizing normal discussion as refusing to get the point. You've done this countless times; it's unhelpful and stifles discussion. Please stop it.
1269:
I responded to the first diff above. And the last diff is laughable to interpret as falling under the topic ban. As for the second diff, I do see your point. But is one diff really enough for the one week site wide block?
1303:
You again fail to respond or explain yourself further short of providing diffs. You did this last time too, and it took being dragged to EA for you to further explain yourself. Please engage in discussion on talk pages.
160:(btw, I see one of the stalkers of my talk page already replied to you. I removed his comment. He somehow managed to completely mischaraterize what you were saying; he's done the same to me many times. Just ignore him.) 858:
The more I think about it, the more I wonder why the practice here is apparently to treat the breadth of a topic ban as wider than the Committee thought it logical to define in regards to regular PIA restrictions...
1473:
This is a prime example I advocated for reducing Joe's topic ban to a simple "indefinite until appealed" topic ban, rather than a topic ban until "re-extended-confirmed". It causes too much confusion. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez
623:. That said, refactoring other users' comments is generally frowned upon, so it's usually better to simply revert the entire edit rather than to censor specific sentences. @JoeJShmo, it's the umpteenth time you're 778:
Also, the question I was discussing with selfstudier was whether the specific sentence linking the ARB rules and the 1RR rule fell under the spirit of the topic ban. Perhaps you can clear that up.
829:. Not sure if this is specifically by PIA and not by all ECR. Either way, I had previously assumed a topic ban in PIA wouldn't be more wide spread than the original area of conflict itself. 1377:
Any comments related to the topic area, not just the real world conflict but anything about the topic area itself, is covered. You can keep arguing this, but its going to end with either a
584:
Agreed. That's incredibly deceptive since I wouldn't have replied were it not for the removed material; that's what I was replying to. I've reverted that edit. Please strike it if need be.
1096: 1385:
indef block. Or, and this is the wiser move, consider that people who have tens of thousands of edits have a better understanding of the rules here, and try to adapt to them.
104:
never let us forget it. I saw one of them who said a contributor was 'POV' on Israel... because "he's Jewish". They're shameless. And by the way, I love your user page.
1109:. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. 1162: 393:
I'll take this to mean it was your own judgement call. In the future, I encourage you to ask for advice whether something specific falls under a topic ban
749:
As I mentioned above, I was not aware that topic bans apply to userspace, as I assumed that was subject to the same exception as ECR. Now I know better.
250:
Your tban and ECR cover comments written anywhere and I have removed those comments that violate the restrictions at HumansRightsIsCool user talk.
1138: 1134: 1333:
I'm not sure what more you want than diffs to clear violations of your topic ban. Yes, a single edit is enough, but you had multiple violations.
1116: 1112: 969:
That's alright, you're just doing your job ;). By the way, where do I go to do a regular appeal of the ban when I feel that's appropriate?*
941: 1338: 1256: 1147: 1017: 955: 740: 1003: 610: 200:
You actually put a smile on my face. That was he first time anyone has ever acknowledged me in an AfD discussion before. :)
909:
Which part of "anywhere on Knowledge (XXG)" you don't understand? Also, a detailed explanation has been linked for you as
295:
No objection to your giving advice, every objection to your commenting about the conflict, which are the parts I removed.
486:
question in regards to why an admin would apply a ban in a wider manner than the Committee generally thought appropriate.
39: 34: 1101: 72: 1053:
I just enabled it but the 'email user' option isn't showing for me right now. Perhaps it takes some time to process.
624: 1463: 1334: 1300: 1266: 1252: 1203: 1143: 736: 370: 1166:
notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
51: 521: 1479: 621:
Anyone is free to revert any edits made in violation of a ban or block, without giving any further reason
616: 1458: 1420: 1021: 959: 722: 679: 546: 431: 384: 300: 255: 146: 93: 1505: 816: 589: 529: 480: 1382: 902: 1013: 951: 1457:
I still think you have your hands fun with difficult areas and jumping into another is not wise.
1387: 919: 633: 57: 1475: 1043: 910: 898: 735:
It was a topic ban violation. If you continue to violate your topic ban you will be blocked.
517: 426:
No, I won't be doing that and I am only doing it now because you are contesting the obvious.
1133:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the 1123: 718: 717:
I thought the 1521 edits involved an EC restriction, my apologies. Just a tban breach then.
675: 542: 476: 427: 380: 296: 251: 142: 134: 89: 53: 1488:
I don't see what's causing any confusion here; the provisions are clearly set forth in the
1378: 1038:
I want to give you some tips (how not to get into trouble) but your email is disabled :( .
826: 808: 1501: 944:
you filed against your topic ban as declined as there was not a consensus to overturn it.
812: 585: 525: 1002:
That was the right place to appeal it. The procedure and places to appeal are listed at
1137:
on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (
1008: 946: 516:
I think it's useful to remember that the principles of general site-wide policies like
1519: 1427: 1351: 1307: 1273: 1210: 1176: 1056: 972: 914: 893: 862: 832: 781: 752: 691: 648: 628: 558: 490: 443: 400: 342: 312: 269: 218: 205: 164: 107: 1039: 1089: 688:
You must've missed it above when I told you I am EC. That's never been revoked.
138: 1454:
I have done so. Apologies for misreading, I thought E/C had been removed.
913:– can you please indicate which policy wording there you find unclear? — 541:
to alter comments that have been replied to, creates a false impression.
201: 55: 1540: 1509: 1483: 1468: 1448: 1394: 1372: 1342: 1328: 1294: 1260: 1231: 1197: 1151: 1077: 1047: 1025: 993: 963: 921: 883: 853: 820: 802: 773: 744: 726: 712: 683: 669: 635: 593: 579: 550: 533: 511: 464: 435: 421: 388: 363: 333: 304: 290: 259: 239: 209: 185: 150: 128: 97: 627:, and I fear you're heading towards getting blocked from editing. — 520:
are still also in force, and not only ArbCom stuff. We don't get to
811:
makes no exceptions for userspace. Something isn't adding up here.
901:
from making any edits that relate to the Arab-Israeli conflict (
1516:
I hear you, I'll take that point. Thanks for clearing this up!
58: 17: 133:
Thank you about my user page. I was inspired by an interview
1088: 915: 629: 1119:) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: 1111:
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the
1128:
Your reason here OR place the reason below this template.
1004:
Knowledge (XXG):Contentious topics#Appeals and amendments
1497: 1493: 1489: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1236: 907: 538: 376: 1141:), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 1099:, and for violating your topic ban., you have been 440:This hardly qualifies as obvious, but I digress. 88:are unequally enforced. Stay strong and brave. 1424:sanctions may have been outdated. Thank you. 1126:|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. 1105:from editing Knowledge (XXG) for a period of 66:This page has archives. Sections older than 8: 1173:Kindly point me to the diffs in question. 1161:In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following 1247:are all violations that took place after 1135:arbitration enforcement appeals template 896: 620: 76:when more than 5 sections are present. 7: 1163:procedure instructing administrators 827:Definition of the "area of conflict" 674:Violation of a ban and ecr, both. 14: 70:may be automatically archived by 1494:Arbitration noticeboard closure 196:I just saw the AfD.. thank you. 905:) anywhere on Knowledge (XXG). 339:this your own judgement call. 309:No problem. I'll reword that. 1: 640:The question here is whether 1159:Reminder to administrators: 1559: 825:It says it in ARBPIA. See 397:you remove it, not after. 1541:04:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC) 1510:04:09, 30 July 2024 (UTC) 1484:03:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC) 1469:02:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC) 1449:01:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC) 1395:01:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC) 1373:23:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 1343:23:34, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 1329:23:28, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 1295:19:22, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 1261:11:01, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 1232:10:05, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 1198:09:20, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 1152:09:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 1113:guide to appealing blocks 1078:02:35, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 1048:01:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 1026:11:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 994:12:16, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 964:12:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 922:14:27, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 884:10:47, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 854:10:39, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 821:10:29, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 803:10:19, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 774:10:13, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 745:10:10, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 727:10:17, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 713:10:11, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 684:10:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 670:10:07, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 636:09:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 625:refusing to get the point 594:17:23, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 580:15:43, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 551:15:41, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 534:12:12, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 512:11:43, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 465:09:34, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 436:09:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 422:09:29, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 389:09:22, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 364:09:18, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 334:09:13, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 305:09:09, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 291:09:07, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 260:08:52, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 240:02:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 210:00:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 186:22:19, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 151:18:18, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 129:20:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 98:20:07, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 1490:topic ban notice above 1093: 73:Lowercase sigmabot III 1335:ScottishFinnishRadish 1301:ScottishFinnishRadish 1267:ScottishFinnishRadish 1253:ScottishFinnishRadish 1204:ScottishFinnishRadish 1144:ScottishFinnishRadish 1092: 807:That makes no sense; 737:ScottishFinnishRadish 555:Should've struck it. 371:ScottishFinnishRadish 1097:arbitration decision 1094: 940:Hi JoeJShmo, I've 936:AE appeal declined 539:It is bad practice 524:; they all apply. 1167: 942:closed the appeal 903:broadly construed 611:talk page stalker 161: 80: 79: 45: 44: 1550: 1539: 1534: 1531: 1528: 1525: 1522: 1466: 1461: 1447: 1442: 1439: 1436: 1433: 1430: 1421:Star Mississippi 1390: 1371: 1366: 1363: 1360: 1357: 1354: 1327: 1322: 1319: 1316: 1313: 1310: 1293: 1288: 1285: 1282: 1279: 1276: 1230: 1225: 1222: 1219: 1216: 1213: 1196: 1191: 1188: 1185: 1182: 1179: 1157: 1132: 1131: 1076: 1071: 1068: 1065: 1062: 1059: 992: 987: 984: 981: 978: 975: 917: 882: 877: 874: 871: 868: 865: 852: 847: 844: 841: 838: 835: 801: 796: 793: 790: 787: 784: 772: 767: 764: 761: 758: 755: 711: 706: 703: 700: 697: 694: 668: 663: 660: 657: 654: 651: 631: 614: 578: 573: 570: 567: 564: 561: 510: 505: 502: 499: 496: 493: 463: 458: 455: 452: 449: 446: 420: 415: 412: 409: 406: 403: 374: 362: 357: 354: 351: 348: 345: 332: 327: 324: 321: 318: 315: 289: 284: 281: 278: 275: 272: 238: 233: 230: 227: 224: 221: 215:You're welcome! 184: 179: 176: 173: 170: 167: 159: 135:Michael Rapaport 127: 122: 119: 116: 113: 110: 75: 59: 31: 30: 18: 1558: 1557: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1532: 1529: 1526: 1523: 1520: 1517: 1464: 1459: 1440: 1437: 1434: 1431: 1428: 1425: 1417: 1415:StarMississippi 1388: 1364: 1361: 1358: 1355: 1352: 1349: 1320: 1317: 1314: 1311: 1308: 1305: 1286: 1283: 1280: 1277: 1274: 1271: 1249:you were warned 1223: 1220: 1217: 1214: 1211: 1208: 1189: 1186: 1183: 1180: 1177: 1174: 1170: 1169: 1121: 1120: 1086: 1069: 1066: 1063: 1060: 1057: 1054: 1036: 985: 982: 979: 976: 973: 970: 938: 897:you are hereby 875: 872: 869: 866: 863: 860: 845: 842: 839: 836: 833: 830: 794: 791: 788: 785: 782: 779: 765: 762: 759: 756: 753: 750: 704: 701: 698: 695: 692: 689: 661: 658: 655: 652: 649: 646: 608: 571: 568: 565: 562: 559: 556: 522:pick and choose 503: 500: 497: 494: 491: 488: 481:Red-tailed hawk 456: 453: 450: 447: 444: 441: 413: 410: 407: 404: 401: 398: 368: 355: 352: 349: 346: 343: 340: 325: 322: 319: 316: 313: 310: 282: 279: 276: 273: 270: 267: 248: 231: 228: 225: 222: 219: 216: 198: 177: 174: 171: 168: 165: 162: 120: 117: 114: 111: 108: 105: 85: 71: 60: 54: 25: 12: 11: 5: 1556: 1554: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1455: 1416: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1155: 1154: 1115:(specifically 1095:To enforce an 1087: 1085: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1035: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 997: 996: 937: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 924: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 805: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 582: 536: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 336: 247: 244: 243: 242: 197: 194: 193: 192: 191: 190: 189: 188: 157: 84: 81: 78: 77: 65: 62: 61: 56: 52: 50: 47: 46: 43: 42: 37: 27: 26: 21: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1555: 1542: 1538: 1536: 1535: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1467: 1462: 1456: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1446: 1444: 1443: 1422: 1414: 1396: 1392: 1391: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1370: 1368: 1367: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1326: 1324: 1323: 1302: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1292: 1290: 1289: 1268: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1229: 1227: 1226: 1205: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1195: 1193: 1192: 1172: 1171: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1142: 1140: 1136: 1129: 1125: 1118: 1114: 1108: 1104: 1103: 1098: 1091: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1073: 1072: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1033: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1010: 1005: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 995: 991: 989: 988: 968: 967: 966: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 948: 943: 935: 923: 920: 918: 912: 908: 906: 904: 900: 895: 891: 885: 881: 879: 878: 857: 856: 855: 851: 849: 848: 828: 824: 823: 822: 818: 814: 810: 806: 804: 800: 798: 797: 777: 776: 775: 771: 769: 768: 748: 747: 746: 742: 738: 734: 728: 724: 720: 716: 715: 714: 710: 708: 707: 687: 686: 685: 681: 677: 673: 672: 671: 667: 665: 664: 643: 639: 638: 637: 634: 632: 626: 622: 618: 612: 607: 595: 591: 587: 583: 581: 577: 575: 574: 554: 553: 552: 548: 544: 540: 537: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 514: 513: 509: 507: 506: 487: 482: 478: 474: 466: 462: 460: 459: 439: 438: 437: 433: 429: 425: 424: 423: 419: 417: 416: 396: 392: 391: 390: 386: 382: 378: 372: 367: 366: 365: 361: 359: 358: 337: 335: 331: 329: 328: 308: 307: 306: 302: 298: 294: 293: 292: 288: 286: 285: 264: 263: 262: 261: 257: 253: 245: 241: 237: 235: 234: 214: 213: 212: 211: 207: 203: 195: 187: 183: 181: 180: 158: 154: 153: 152: 148: 144: 140: 136: 132: 131: 130: 126: 124: 123: 102: 101: 100: 99: 95: 91: 82: 74: 69: 64: 63: 49: 48: 41: 38: 36: 33: 32: 29: 28: 24: 20: 19: 16: 1537: 1518: 1498:AE log entry 1445: 1426: 1418: 1386: 1369: 1350: 1325: 1306: 1291: 1272: 1228: 1209: 1194: 1175: 1158: 1156: 1127: 1117:this section 1110: 1106: 1100: 1074: 1055: 1037: 1007: 990: 971: 945: 939: 899:topic banned 880: 861: 850: 831: 799: 780: 770: 751: 709: 690: 666: 647: 641: 617:WP:BANREVERT 576: 557: 508: 489: 484: 461: 442: 418: 399: 394: 379:reasonable? 360: 341: 330: 311: 287: 268: 249: 236: 217: 199: 182: 163: 125: 106: 86: 67: 22: 15: 1465:Mississippi 719:Selfstudier 676:Selfstudier 543:Selfstudier 483:any input? 477:Doug Weller 428:Selfstudier 381:Selfstudier 297:Selfstudier 252:Selfstudier 143:DaringDonna 90:DaringDonna 1502:Left guide 1496:, and the 1383:WP:NOTHERE 1034:hello fren 813:Left guide 586:Left guide 526:Left guide 377:my removal 139:Bari Weiss 1084:July 2024 1009:Callanecc 947:Callanecc 137:had with 40:Archive 2 35:Archive 1 1389:nableezy 1139:by email 1018:contribs 956:contribs 916:kashmīrī 894:JoeJShmo 642:the edit 630:kashmīrī 23:Archives 1480:say hi! 1124:unblock 1102:blocked 1040:Emdosis 911:WP:TBAN 518:WP:TBAN 83:Support 68:14 days 1492:, the 1379:WP:CIR 1243:, and 1130:~~~~}} 1107:1 week 809:WP:ECR 395:before 1381:or a 1506:talk 1476:User 1460:Star 1339:talk 1257:talk 1245:this 1241:this 1237:This 1148:talk 1044:talk 1022:logs 1014:talk 960:logs 952:talk 817:talk 741:talk 723:talk 680:talk 615:Per 590:talk 547:talk 530:talk 432:talk 385:talk 301:talk 256:talk 246:Tban 206:talk 147:talk 94:talk 1393:- 375:Is 202:9t5 1533:mo 1530:Sh 1521:Jo 1508:) 1500:. 1482:) 1441:mo 1438:Sh 1429:Jo 1365:mo 1362:Sh 1353:Jo 1341:) 1321:mo 1318:Sh 1309:Jo 1287:mo 1284:Sh 1275:Jo 1259:) 1251:. 1239:, 1224:mo 1221:Sh 1212:Jo 1190:mo 1187:Sh 1178:Jo 1150:) 1122:{{ 1070:mo 1067:Sh 1058:Jo 1046:) 1024:) 1020:• 1016:• 1006:. 986:mo 983:Sh 974:Jo 962:) 958:• 954:• 876:mo 873:Sh 864:Jo 846:mo 843:Sh 834:Jo 819:) 795:mo 792:Sh 783:Jo 766:mo 763:Sh 754:Jo 743:) 725:) 705:mo 702:Sh 693:Jo 682:) 662:mo 659:Sh 650:Jo 619:, 592:) 572:mo 569:Sh 560:Jo 549:) 532:) 504:mo 501:Sh 492:Jo 457:mo 454:Sh 445:Jo 434:) 414:mo 411:Sh 402:Jo 387:) 356:mo 353:Sh 344:Jo 326:mo 323:Sh 314:Jo 303:) 283:mo 280:Sh 271:Jo 258:) 232:mo 229:Sh 220:Jo 208:) 178:mo 175:Sh 166:Jo 149:) 121:mo 118:Sh 109:Jo 96:) 1527:J 1524:e 1504:( 1478:/ 1474:( 1435:J 1432:e 1419:@ 1359:J 1356:e 1337:( 1315:J 1312:e 1299:@ 1281:J 1278:e 1265:@ 1255:( 1218:J 1215:e 1202:@ 1184:J 1181:e 1146:( 1064:J 1061:e 1042:( 1012:( 980:J 977:e 950:( 892:@ 870:J 867:e 840:J 837:e 815:( 789:J 786:e 760:J 757:e 739:( 721:( 699:J 696:e 678:( 656:J 653:e 613:) 609:( 588:( 566:J 563:e 545:( 528:( 498:J 495:e 479:@ 475:@ 451:J 448:e 430:( 408:J 405:e 383:( 373:: 369:@ 350:J 347:e 320:J 317:e 299:( 277:J 274:e 254:( 226:J 223:e 204:( 172:J 169:e 145:( 115:J 112:e 92:(

Index

Archive 1
Archive 2
Lowercase sigmabot III
DaringDonna
talk
20:07, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
JoeJShmo

20:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Michael Rapaport
Bari Weiss
DaringDonna
talk
18:18, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
JoeJShmo

22:19, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
9t5
talk
00:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
JoeJShmo

02:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Selfstudier
talk
08:52, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
JoeJShmo

09:07, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Selfstudier

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.