User talk:Joegoodfriend - Knowledge (XXG)

2632:

that the article in its current state is bloated and the four or five main "conspiracy theories" are lost in a jumble of details, particularly for the uninformed reader. In the example above, there is so much material regarding the idea of a New Orleans conspiracy that it is likely deserving of a stand-alone article. Fixing a topic as immense as this one is very difficult for experienced editors who are supposed to understand policies and guidelines regarding WP:WEIGHT, WP:RS, WP:SPS, WP:PRIMARY, etc., and virtually impossible for drive-by newbies who seem to think it will be resolved by adding a particular detail here or there. We all need to do a better job of taking the high road by not responding to sniping or discussion that is not relevant to article improvement. -

1473:

television cameraman Malcolm Couch shoot footage which shows Baker's motorcycle and Baker himself running towards the entrance. We know when, to within a second, of when this footage shows Baker, as it calibrates with the footage Dave Weigman who caught the presidential limousine before it reached the underpass. Far from the "15 seconds" Baker estimated it took to get in the front door and the "by 10 seconds" estimated by some conspiracy theorists, Baker is last seen in the Couch footage 18 seconds after the third shot, and it would have taken him a further 13 seconds to get to the front door at the same pace, let alone get in the door (Bugliosi, endnotes, p. 471). This adds much more time than most have supposed before Baker encountered Oswald.

966:

sentence or two mention of the Bringueir confrontation, and maybe a sentence stating that Garrison extensively investigated Oswald whereabouts during his investigation. Then we could jump cite that says "For further information regarding Oswald's Stay in New Orleans see the Trial of Clay Shaw article", where we can go a little more in depth about the alleged Ferrie Oswald connections, the assassination party with Russo, the anti-Castro Cubans, 544 Camp, etc. I'd really like your help or thoughts because contrary to what Mtracy thinks, I do want a balanced article. However, I am not going to sacrifice readability so that every little tidbit is in the article.

2341:(wow) will help you with some ideas about how to cope with Brandon. RPJ, like Brandon, believed that everyone else in the talk pages was involved in a vast conspiracy to promote false and misleading propaganda. Regarding the famous backyard photos of Oswald, RPJ refused to respond to the questions I raised, instead started a new thread to attack my motives and suggested that I am personally part of a conspiracy to hide key conspiracy evidence from the public. This is in contrast to Jack, who considers me part of a "dishonest" and "ludicrous" "crowd" conspiracy dedicated to SPREADING dubious conspiracy theories about the assassination. Good luck. 1424:

among other things. I should make my position clear. I cannot understand why the files of the Soviet spy system should be seen as conclusive about anything. We have the trial evidence, the analysis by various researchers, the biographical data, books by Whittaker Chambers and Alger Hiss,etc.etc. There is a difference in quality. It seems to me that there is an anxiety among right-wing people and writers in the USA to believe Hiss guilty regardless of the facts. This shows in their question-begging, personal abuse and charges that those who do not agree with them are stupid, crypto-communists, and so on.Rhosfawr

1341:

referncing that website cites a total of 96 witnesses. The Lifton book, Best Evidence, which I've cited here lists 90 total. So I'm not sure how to resolve those discrepancies here. Perhaps we should remove the data cited in footnote "5. Dealey Plaza Eyewitnesses; Earwitness Tabulation." as the number of witnesses listed on the website does not correlate with the figures posted here? (I hate removing info from Knowledge (XXG) though as it all seems valuable in some way, even if to discredit the Warren Commish supporters). Thanks again, and please do let your voice be heard on the Jim Braden DELETION debate.

2561:"Indeed, the level of denial from the conspiracy crowd in terms of addressing the reams of concrete evidence linking Oswald and the rifle to the crime is such that it approaches Holocaust denial. EVERY piece of incriminating evidence was planted and/or faked many of them claim. While there may be some who indeed believe that, we don't likewise insert "alleged" to the Holocaust because there are those who claim the official investigations were frauds. To deny the evidence is to deny the veracity of standard forensic techniques and therefore the conclusions of ANY criminal case." 1090:

traffic-HOW LONG were they stuck before he asked for the transfer?), catch a taxi, exit the taxi two blocks from his rooming house, go inside, grab his pistol and jacket, and then be at Oak Cliff at 1.13 where he allegedly killed Officer Tippit.?!!!! I agree with you that he had to have had a ride to Oak Cliff. Was the transfer found on Oswald after his arrest? What time was stamped on the transfer? Lawyers would have run riot with all of these details which the WC so blithely dismissed.--

3848: 3457: 3253: 3841: 3450: 3246: 1486:

alleged Grassy Knoll assassin HAD to have been, HE SAW NO ONE at the time of the assassination. You will note that when interviewed by Mark Lane, Lane conspicuously avoids asking him the direct, simple question of who he saw standing behind the fence in a position where it is thought assassins stood. That's because it is clear he had an UNOBSTRUCTED VIEW of that part of the fence and he SAW NO ONE there. You can't get around this.

1323:

so-called "ear-witness" tabulation. These both refer to witnesses who testified to the Warren Commission, not all known witnesses to the assassination who have gone on record. The people that the WC cited as "witnesses" drew heavily from government people and the press in the motorcade, NOT bystanders in Dealey plaza. The motorcade witnesses could of course be counted on not to rock the boat on the WC's pre-ordained conclusions.

2160: 3602: 2914: 1613: 3756: 3525: 3337: 2970: 2751:

late 1960s and early 1970s touching on Garrison's investigation on which to build such an article, however, it seems as though articles like this tend to serve as a magnet for primary source material such as witness statements and police reports. IMO, editors are conducting a form of original research when they insert testimony and documents that haven't been discussed in reliable secondary sources. -

248:. Oswald did not kill Tippit, and it’s easy to produce facts that shows he didn’t. But this section just starts with “According to the Warren Commission report,” and has no balance. If anyone has time to work on this, please do so. I can help you with facts regarding this or any other aspects of the JFK articles. Just remember, you can get the truth past Gamaliel, if you do your homework. 1229:. If you don't like this entry, perhaps you should think about merging it. Anyways, the reason I had been considering a fork was because I thought the original Kennedy conspiracy article talked too much about the CIA instead of other competing theories. I am personally a fan of the LBJ-Masonic theory, which is barely mentioned in the original article. 2077: 1808: 418: 1583:

Hi, I see you have the one major film of Keaton's listed; another found by James Mason in 1955 is "The Boat". Does anyone know the list of titles that Mason discovered and had restored? He found these in Keaton's old house that he bought and remodelled.75.21.113.40 (talk) 09:26, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

1560:

No one will ever say Jack doesn't do his homework. And I'd like to add that you've never made an edit to an article with which I did not agree. I'm also aware that Mark Lane is a person who has a hard time always telling the truth, and that calls into question everything he's said and written. I need

1389:

Yes, they did work together. MacLean was the British liason officer to the Office that Hiss directed. Of course the fact that Hiss worked with a major league KGB agent does not automatically condemn him of anything similar. James Angleton worked with, and was a personal friend of Kim Philby. Angleton

1322:

Keep going. Something to keep in mind: this business about what "the witnesses" has been a way for the pro-Warren crowd to make points in a weasel-word sort of way. For instance the phrase, "none of the witnesses actually on the Grassy Knoll believed that any shots came from the Grassy Knoll." Or the

671:

You're welcome. I have to admit that the Knowledge (XXG) interface is a bit clumsy for arranging images. The key point about a biography article is that the most representative picture should appear in the upper right-hand corner of the article. If you intend to improve this article further, you may

133:

The evidence that most clearly exonerates Oswald has to do with his movements immediately following the assassination. Oswald was met by his manager and a police officer in the second floor lunchroom between 70 and 90 seconds after the shooting. According to Warren, this was enough time for Oswald to

2569:

In case you’re wondering, I personally believe that there was a second shooter in Dealey Plaza, and I agree with the Director and lead investigators of the HSCA that the “New Orleans conspiracy” is true: Oswald was working with David Ferrie and other anti-Castro Cubans and that the assassination was

2479:

I agree that the article could use some major-league editing, and I'll try to keep an open-mind. I think there's way too much, "Jim Marrs says this." My principal concern is that the article not be rewritten along the lines, "this is all fringe, so the article should mostly be a rehash of Posner and

1485:

You said: "Bowers said, “in the vicinity of where the two men I have described were, there was a flash of light or smoke.”" That's not quite he said when questioned by the WC etc. Further, what he "saw" happened on the OTHER side of the fence - ie. on the Elm Street side. On the near side, where the

1472:

While I have seen some reconstructions of the time it took Baker to confront Oswald as short as 70 seconds, this is largely based on some of the confusion due to the questioning of where the timing starts - from the first shot (for Baker) or the last shot (for the assassin). However, as I mentioned,

1423:

Hullo JoeGoodfriend. I am Rhosfawr. I saw your note to me about what sounds like an attempt to close debate on the Hiss case on Knowledge (XXG). Unfortunately I did not keep a copy and can't remember your suggestion. I have studied the Hiss case for years and have written a book which deals with it

544:

This seems to be a simple problem; Editors who stand by the Warren Commision, and those who don't. It's a case of "Yes it is", and "No it isn't". The truth is that nobody knows what happened, because nobody actually saw Oswald actually fire the rifle. This is a fact, despite one or two people saying

2646:

I agree the article is bloated. I'm not of a strong opinion of what needs to be trimmed first; any suggestion is welcome as far as I'm concerned. On the one hand, I admit I'm tempted to ignore the TALK discussion not relevant to article improvement, and that might be the responsible thing to do. On

2565:

In other words, (1) he believes Oswald acted alone, the evidence is incontrovertible, and anyone who disagrees MUST be lying or crazy, (2) to say that any of the principal witnesses were mistaken is to call them liars and part of a conspiracy to spread lies, and (3) he styles himself as the world’s

2255:

I had no idea things had gotten so bad. I've strayed away from them for the last couple of years, and every time I wandered back, BrandonTR was a good reason not to stick around. It appears he isn't the only problem, but perhaps if we resolve this big one it will go along way towards making these

1876:

First of all, we need reliable sources for the Obama-Davis claim. David Fredosso claims that "Dreams From My Father" documents the relationship. Does the book in fact do this? On what pages does it do so? Also, apparently Davis is not mentioned by name in "Dreams", Fredosso is making an assumption.

1528:

In the WC testimony, it seems that Bowers is describing two men at the WEST end of the fence, i.e., by the underpass end. However, when Lane talks to him, it is clear he means the EAST end, near the pergola, near where Zapruder was standing. However, he states that the two men are obscured from his

1522:

Hi Joe. Sorry to add all this stuff to your page, but I think the Lee Bower stuff has to be underlined. The WC testimony and the interviews by Lane are somewhat unclear as to what, precisely Bower saw behind the fence during the actual assassination. For the former, it's because it's not always 100

1506:

That's not true. We know that other agents were there - I can name them - who may have been mistaken for SS agents. The only question is whether they self-identified themselves as SS or whether witnesses mistakenly assumed they were SS agents, or whether witnesses misunderstood the agents when they

1340:

Thanks again, Joe. I will! Regarding the dubious "none of the grassy knoll witnesses heard shots from the knoll" claim in the article's footnotes, the tabulation just seems wrong. I checked out the referenced web page, and it lists at LEAST 150 witnesses. The portion of this Knowledge (XXG) article

197:

RPJ is also for full disclosure, and he´s also a good editor. The two do not agree at all, so read the archive page. RPJ has taken a lot of criticism, which I think was heavy-handed. Because I resented the attacks I was also attacked. "Your hero - RPJ" was one, which made me feel ill. Step back and

2750:

was not meant to be spiteful. As I mentioned previously, I believe the New Orleans conspiracy is likely deserving of a stand-alone article and I could see a direct link to it even being placed in the LHO article. There are plenty of reliable secondary sources and neutral newspaper reports from the

2631:

sides of the issue to complain about neutrality issues with this article. My own perspective, as one who believes Oswald acted alone, is that the article does not suffer from major neutrality issues; however, I do think that the article suffers on other points. In my opinion, the primary issues is

1374:

Alger Hiss probably knew thousands of people. It doesn't add anything to the article to simply list them. Is there some significance to the relationship in question? Did they work together? Without any context, the text adds no value to the article. Why do you think the acquaintance is significant

1880:

Second, text regarding an Obama-Davis relationship may be germane to the biographical articles on either man, but it doesn't really belong in the CPUSA article. While the names of prominent CPUSA members may be included in the article, any further information about them belongs elsewhere. Thanks.

1481:

But someone was up there, weren't they? Someone, if not Oswald, fired shots. YOU supplied witnesses who claimed to see two men up there - where did they go? Can't have it both ways. If Oswald was truly (ha ha) on the floor he claimed he was, SOMEONE ELSE was on the sixth and THEY had to escape. I

768:

I am having a tough time explaining to Vidor on why his edit warring on the topic of whether the lead should state that the dictabelt evidence has been debunked, or C.I.Q is not the right way to go. He is simply going into this less accurate/more accurate argument which is IMO irrelevant. Your

2612:

I do find it hilarious how all these guys keep inserting little colloquialisms as if to make it obvious that they are actually thinking about this, instead of simply repeating an obstinate viewpoint which has no relevance to the entry. e.g., "Hey, I was intrigued by how much the evidence clearly

1477:

You "And if it’s so easy to see or hear someone in that building, why didn’t Bonnie Ray Williams see and or hear Oswald while he was eating lunch on the 6th floor from 12-12:15? Why didn’t the people on the 5th floor report hearing someone flying down the stairs at breakneck pace, when it was so

2766:

Thanks Location, I really appreciate your reaching out. It's difficult to contribute because no one on the talk pages for the subject agrees with my point of view on the evidence except Brandon, and he hates me more than anybody. He's repeatedly condemned me as in the tank for the Warren Report

1747:

these are three great research videos by Bob Harris one of the best JFK researchers in my opinion He says here that The shooters may have used a suppressor weapon and due to this, Many witnesses like Clint Hill, Charles Brehm, Mary Moorman and others, didn't hear it at all. He comes up with an

1209:

Hi. Why are you deleting whole sections from this article without discussing it first on talk? Much of the text you deleted is properly sourced and has been in the article a long time. Some of it was hammered out as consensus/compromises to long-standing disputes. (And since I wrote a lot of it

1466:

A few quick answers to your points: Oswald's description. The bottom line is Brennan instantly reported what he saw, as for his height etc, true, he couldn't have seen enough to accurately deduce that, but he may have estimated based on what he may have seen - his torso. NONE of your witnesses

965:

You've come up with a good idea on the Oswald page on how to trim the overbloated New Orleans section. What I want to do is just have the section plainly state what Oswald did that summer. I'd like to treat it as though LHO were alive and BLP would cover the section. Also no quotes, a brief

2550:

I notice that the editor who created the thread hasn't posted to TALK recently and hasn't made any edits to the article. It's not the first time I've seen an editor get mad that an article doesn't reflect their point of view, and demand other editors do a bunch of research and make a bunch of

152:

Also, Oswald was seen in the lunchroom 5-10 minutes BEFORE the motorcade was scheduled to arrive, he was not on the 6th floor then as Warren claimed. Also, Warren's explanation for how Oswald got a rifle into the building was nonsense, and it never did establish a motive. Hey, thanks for your

129:

Pleased to make your acquaintance. I don't know if Wecht commented specifically on Oswald's involvement, however, I believe any serious examination of the evidence quickly demonstrates Oswald's innocence. Suggested are Summers 'Conspiracy', Walt Brown's 'Treachery in Dallas', and Henry Hurt's

240:

Hey guys, thanks for your comments. Let’s look at this situation objectively. I would like to see more of the facts regarding the conspiracy to kill JFK on these pages as much as you would. Now, normally, if you read a history textbook, or an encyclopedia, you’re lucky to get any information

1089:

Joe, once again I have a problem with the time factor involved in Oswald's flight from the TSBD. This time it's in regards to his boarding of the city bus at 12.40 and then at 1.13 has already shot JD Tippit in Oak Cliff! How could he manage to ask for a bus transfer (after bus was stuck in

299:

materials by all means add it. As a side note--If you have an issue with an edit of mine, please refer directly to me by name so that I will know you are referring to me. I think editors get irritated when they get accused of vandalism, hiding information, or are told they're stupid or

269:

names of users, because they tend to get a bit irritated by it. They know what they said, and they know why they said it. Let´s all concentrate on "The article", and then we can work together. "If you do your homework", (JoeGoodfriend) is a phrase that should be respected, and embraced.

3349:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

736:

Alright, I'm new to this, so forgive my ignorance on some of the ground rules. Perhaps there is a better resolution than a mass revert. I feel this article is negatively biased. What do you think? Smaller scale revisions, with time allowed for others to decide yay or nay? RJWitherby

2670:. I think that discussion demonstrates that all of us, myself included, waste a lot of time on things that don't really help improving the relevant articles. I walk on eggshells with BrandonTR and still feel that he takes everything antagonistically. Anyway, I liked your suggestion in 3537:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1539:

I don';t know how more explicit one can get. Of course, Lane omitted this crucial section from his film, focussing on his "smoke or flash of light" line. What was the "smoke" or "light"? Since there was no one behind the fence, it could very well have been a reflection from the limo

1877:

Do we know for a fact that Obama was talking about Davis, and Fredosso isn't just guessing? Finally Fredosso says, "Davis who was, according to one of his sympathetic biographers, a member of the Communist Party USA." Ok, which biographer? Is that biographer a reliable source?

1536:

Now I could see back or the South side of the wooden fence in the area, so that obviously that there was no one there who could have - uh - had anything to do with either - as accomplice or anything else because there was no one there - um - at the moment that the shots were

1523:

per cent clear as to where the several individuals he speaks of are standing, exactly and what they were doing during the assassination, for the latter, Bower explicitly describes what was happening at the moment of the assassination but Lane omits this from his documentary.

1300:

which isn't covered. And some data here that conflicts with info I have in my books (see my recent additions to Witness statistics). I will work to add valuable items as I have time. In the meantime, I hope you will put your two cents in on whether we KEEP or DELETE the

691:

No harm intended, I just figured I'd incorporate more of the language from the staff reports into the section. However, I do think it is important to state that impressions of the report were not and are not official conclusions of the HSCA, lest there is confusion.

193:

I think you will find (and I know that Gamaliel will not mind me saying this) that Gamaliel has extremely strong opinions about conspiracies. He thinks "they´re nuts", and he supports the Warren Commision report, but he is still a good editor and administrator.

1499:

Joe, there was no one behind the fence because Bowers says there was no one behind the fence! And those who said that is where the shots came from didn't report shots from the TSBD. And we KNOW shots were fired from there. Dealy Plaza was an echo chamber.

2982:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1280:

You are definitely on the right track. This article has LONG needed someone knowledgeable to tackle the subject of "suspects in Dealey Plaza other than Oswald," covering Dal-Tex/Braden, the tons of evidence of conspirator(s) on the grassy knoll, etc.

368:

I appreciate your consideration. I'm not afraid of going toe-to-toe with Sb, he can be a little mean, but I'll put my knowledge against his any time. Have a look at Sb's contribution history. Apparently, wikipedia is all he does, seven days a week.

3065:

I'd never seen that article. Wow, it seems kind of silly. It's just trivia, and pure trivia is supposed to be excluded from Knowledge (XXG). Anyway, I've added a 'KEEP' comment. If you think you have consensus among those commenting, add the edit.

2661:

In that discussion, I think CanadaJack was referring to what you yourself described as people who attempt to "refute the irrefutable". Obviously, the two of you differ on what is irrefutable, so the analogy was interpreted as a slight against you.

2534:

thanks for your replies at the entry on JFK assasination theories. I truly don't understand these folks. what are they suggesting? that we resolve the entire historical issue here? on our own? I don't understand what their suggestion actually is.

1639:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

2940:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1124:

But didn't the time stamped on the transfer place him on the bus when the WC had him in the taxi? Oswald just did not have the opportunity to have done so much and moved over a large territory in the space of 43 minutes. Physics do not

3130:

missing on his talk page too. Seriously, I wouldn't worry about it too much. You've already made valuable contributions to the discussion, so even if you stepped back a bit now it wouldn't at all be a loss. Cheers, and thanks again!

1845:

How does the title 'The Obama Chronicles,' Part 3: Barack Obama's Mentors not support that Davis was one of Obama's mentors? There is no doubt that there was mentor-like relationship to the man. What part of "mentor" do you dispute?

2279:

Jack flat-out called me a liar. I gave him a chance to back down, but he came right back again calling me a liar and part of a "dishonest" and "ludicrous" crowd. I'm not going to debate with someone who plays me like that. Thanks

545:

that "It looked like him". Asking for citations (when all the books written about the subject are POVs anyway) is going nowhere. RPJ is asking that all points of view are included, i.e., "let the reader decide" - which is fair.

2725:

It's all good. This particular conflict epitomizes the way the article has been going in the wrong direction for some time -- becoming a laundry list of what very persons say they "believe" about the assassination. Thanks.

1407:

I guess you could work it into the end of the "Accusations of espionage" section, but I'm not sure what you could say about it other than, "although the two worked together, Hiss has never been linked to MacLean's spying."

550:

I understand that Knowledge (XXG) is about facts, but don't forget that Bush and Blair both believed that "Weapons of mass-destruction" were in Iraq before it was invaded. Give RPJ his own page, and stop fighting. Be nice.

1931:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

814:

You don't by chance still have the bowtie nametag Uncle Al gave away to all the kids, do you? I never went on the show, but I always wanted one of those tags- primarily because of the '9' logo it had on it! LOL (from

702:

Yes, there is an important distinction between the opinions of the staff reports and the Committee's conclusions. I have no objection to noting this is the paragraph. One edit war over this material was enough. Thanks.

1643:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

3799: 3565: 3377: 3010: 2944:

2613:

shows there is no validity to any alternate theories whatsoever. funny story, how if you read all the real sources, they all point to that conclusion only. funny how that is, isn't it?" that kind of thing. :-) --

2869:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2647:

the other hand, that means a certain editor gets to use the TALK page as his personal blog. It's tough for a serious amateur historian like myself to be repeatedly told I'm no different from a Holocaust denier.

1545:

Lane has been caught red-handed on several occasions misrepresenting evidence, even lying about what people have said. If he was honest about Bower's testimony - he wasn't - we'd not be debating this issue now.

345:

Sbharris has been editing since November, 2005, and Joegoodfriend has been editing since March, 2006. Sbharris is no position to talk about newcomers. This is not what Knowledge (XXG) needs. Please be nice.

1587:

This is from the talk page at lost films that were rediscovered. I see you are active and knowledgeable; do you know where I can find a list of the Buster Keaton film discovery made by James Mason in 1955?

1492:

Name the witnesses. Some of those say that the "smoke" was from motorcycles, other from a position which couldn't reasonably be from a rifle. And others didn't report anything of the sort until much later.

976:

Sounds good. I'm disappointed in our new editor friend. Another editor who seems to have a lot of knowledge, yet has a cavalier attitude, takes offense immediately, and who is quickly ready to push an edit

2276: 980:

Suggest that you start a new section on LHO talk proposing the above solution. I'll jump right in and second the motion, and I think pretty soon we'll have a consensus that can tag-team on needed edits.

3783:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3549:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3361:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3046:

because her death is not unusual. But my edit was reverted. Even after providing satisfactory citations/sources, the death of Isadora is not being removed. What do you think further steps should be?

2994:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 750:

This is critical: Use fatual statements backed by citations from reliable sources. If your citations are valid, other editors will have a harder time justifying changing or reverting your new text.

2784:

FYI: In LHO, I placed a proposal for a re-write on the talk page. This is not meant to be a substitute for the a full article touching on Garrison's investigation or the New Orleans conspiracy. -

2241:

I would be glad to contribute to an RFC. I wish I had some friends on these talk pages. You know, CanadaJack and I aren't on speaking terms any more since he repeatedly called me a liar. Oh well.

1529:

line of sight as they move in FRONT of the fence as the "caravan" as he calls it passes. In photos from the far side of Elm, we in fact see three men, two of whom are likely the ones he refers to.

2193: 935:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

888:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

841:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

168:

Thanks for your comments. I know it gets confusing, because of the numerous replies from other editors (sometimes sarcastic and without paragraphs) but real humour is always appreciated. Your,

3769: 3172:, to bring it to the state before the dispute. You will realise what i am saying once you see the history. Should there be a discussion on the talk page, i request you to take part in it. — 667:

Hi, I wrote the John Clem article. I wasn't sure how to clean it up after another editor added a third picture. You did a fine job, much thanks. Joegoodfriend 05:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

1748:

amazing theory on the Single Bullet theory, he suggests that it was not planted like what many said but it may have come FROM another victim who had nothing to do with the assassination.

795:

By an odd coincidence, I became acquainted with the hosts of both shows. I appeared on Uncle Al as a tyke in 1974. We then moved to Ames, IA where I often bumped into Betty Lou Varnum of

2671: 2509: 2461: 2330:

I just had to see what he said, and I found this attack on you: "Just admit it. You don't want this in the article because it goes against the propaganda you are trying to promote."

119:

Do you know if he believes that Oswald was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy at all? Also do you know of any other researchers that hold this opinion as well.

2570:

greenlighted by mob boss Carlos Marcello. In the article, I was the original author of the New Orleans conspiracy, other published theories, and some other stuff as well. Cheers.

2464:, an idea to add a list of prominent lone gunman critics near the beginning of the article has been proposed. I'm wondering if you might be willing to work on it with me. Thanks! 1823: 190:

Let´s not get personal about this. You say you´re new to this, but I would advise you to take a step back and look at the article, and not get involved in personal squabbles.

2303:

of an RFC. I wanted to see if you thought the summary was appropriate and if you had any suggestions or concerns. Feel free to edit the draft and to add diffs if you wish.

1470:

Truly - As I said, from the reconstructions, what you said is correct (75s, 90s, etc). We had this discussion already, on the "conspiracies" page, remember? To refresh...

134:

look out the window, drop the rifle charge down the stairs and arrive in the lunchroom, with a couple of seconds to spare. However, Warren either ignored or was unaware that:

2168: 2164: 2034:

and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

1669:

I am not the same person who does the misspelling and anything else and I am not going to do a debate on here so delete this soon but I want you to see and decide on this.

140:

2. Witnesses on the fifth floor testified that it was so quiet that they could hear footsteps on the floor above, yet neither saw nor heard anyone running down the stairs.

2338: 580: 576: 3169: 2566:

greatest expert on what those questioning the official conclusions believe, despite the fact that he seems to never have read the better-regarded works on the subject.

753:

Follow wikipedia's rules on reliable sources, NPOV, etc., and soon it will be your text that becomes consensus, and other editors will defend your work. Best of luck.

295:, I think you'll find that most disputes relating to JFK is a result of what is the proper spin to put on the source and not the content of the sources. If you have 1954: 2937: 1636: 995:

FYI--There is significant evidence that "our new editor friend" is neither new or a friend. But on another note, I'll be listing the proposal on the LHO page.

645:

Edits by anonymous ips or alternative accounts which mirror RPJ's editing behavior are subject to the remedies applied to RPJ. Blocks and bans to be logged at

44: 2926: 2324:

You did a good job on the draft. I haven't been reading every thread on the assassinations page recently; a lot of the topics just haven't been interesting.

1625: 1183:

Joegoodfriend, thanks for deleting that remark directed against me on the Lee Harvey Oswald talk page. If someone has the temerity to call another person a

3428:

Hi. Wish I had to more to edit the JFK assassination articles. And it hard to want to get into more fights with certain editors who shall remain nameless.

1226: 927:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at 880:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at 833:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at 2586:

hm, I agree with you. i do feel that somebody somewhere in the government might have played some role. I have a few different ideas on who and where. --

642:

RPJ is placed on indefinite probation. He may be banned from the site for an appropriate period by any administrator if he edits in a disruptive manner.

3142:

Thanks. I'm the original author of a number of sections of that article. I'll be introducing "Second Oswald Theory" as soon as I can get around to it.

1297: 3663: 2334: 939: 932: 892: 885: 845: 838: 673: 646: 629: 572: 562: 216: 64: 2216:

I've read the quotes from BrandonTR that you posted and, if anything, he's a bigger problem than I thought. Would you be willing to sign on to an

2089: 943: 896: 849: 212: 37: 2557: 1767: 1801: 54: 3821: 3579: 3391: 3024: 2894: 1972:

talk page before reverting any more content. An RFC on the specific issues might be useful to gain more community input to the dispute. --

931:

carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at

884:

carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at

837:

carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at

1936: 713:

Thanks for the supportive words. I know I'm constantly fighting an uphill battle because the status quo goons suffer so strongly from the

607:, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as 3733: 3725: 1785: 1687: 1589: 1104:

Hi Jeanne, yes Oswald had the transfer on him when he was arrested. I have made some additional remarks on this subject today on the

75:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

2811: 1654: 744:

Use the talk page first. Itemize a few things you think are biased point-of-view. See who agrees. Sign your posts on talk with 4 "~"

3667: 2038: 2031: 1158:

A pity it didn't have the time stamped on it. That could have proved Oswald was still on the bus when the WC had him in the taxi!--

2220:

regarding his conduct? I hate to go to these measures, but in the absence of outside intervention I don't feel we have a choice.

137:

1. The sniper's nest was found 'closed', in other words, the heavy boxes had been pushed back into place after the assassination.

891:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

844:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

149:

5. The officer's originally testimony stated that Oswald was drinking a Coke from the lunchroom machine, that's more time still.

84: 3817: 3575: 3387: 3020: 2890: 938:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our

3792: 3558: 3370: 3003: 428:. Please do not restore this material to the article or its talk page. If you do, you may be blocked for disruption. See the 3655: 3613: 3591: 2196:. I never forget a slight. :) By the way, in case you were wondering, Joe Goodfriend is my real name. Take care and thanks. 2044: 1756:

and in this video, he says Hill reacted to one shot at frame 285 and another that was fired just after the fatal head shot.

392: 2085: 496: 3659: 928: 881: 834: 399:

a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the

241:

regarding any kind of conspiracy, that’s just the way mass media works. But there is some good balance in these articles.

3878: 2930: 2881:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2554:

I’ve been arguing with Jack on that talk page for about 10 years. I think this recent statement he made explains a lot:

1629: 1261:

on Dealey Plaza at the time of the murder. The article contains useful, sourced information, but is being targeted for

429: 388: 3804: 3570: 3382: 3087: 3015: 2886: 3108:

Will do Earl. FYI, Jack's repeatedly called me a liar, and I'm reluctant to get into any protracted debate with him.

2327:

I have an idea for you. Taking another look, I see that you edited some of Brandon's comments for personal attacks.

2807: 2081: 2069: 1305:

article. There is quite a lively discussion going on, and I feel many of the editors chiming in are ill-informed.

3136: 3098: 3082:

Request for comment at John F. Kennedy Assassination Conspiracy Theories (RE: interpretations of the HSCA report)

829: 722: 49: 3509: 3305: 2300: 951: 904: 876: 857: 186:"RPJ, please stop this. Full disclosure: I believe President Kennedy was killed as the result of a conspiracy." 3780: 3546: 3358: 2991: 3642: 1950: 1946: 143:

3. Two persons on the 4th floor left by the stairs 30 secs. after the shooting, but saw no one on the stairs.

3882: 3737: 3729: 3491: 3413: 3287: 3220: 3200: 3179: 3055: 1192: 1163: 1130: 1095: 1020: 105: 1781: 1683: 59: 3043: 3036: 2823: 2105: 2097: 1925: 1912: 1789: 1778:

Sorry I cannot put on the names of the videos so you can know what they called. Well, what do you think?

1691: 1593: 1346: 1310: 1270: 383:

Watch for 3RR violation! Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in

3671: 2882: 1768:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXWC87-WOKU&list=UUejjF--PW1v2IyEo1A6US0A&index=9&feature=plcp

69: 3609: 3595: 1650: 1551: 1512: 587: 249: 154: 1443:

is the Alger Hiss RFC. It would be great if we could get your opinion on the proposals. Thanks again.

1302: 1262: 465:

for clarification that blogs are not reliable sources, especially for articles about living persons.--

3689: 3132: 3094: 2667: 2013: 1977: 1859: 1534:

But, just in case there is ANY confusion as to what, exactly, he saw behind the fence, he says this:

1033: 718: 3763: 3533: 3345: 2978: 2960: 2858: 2849: 2770:

A spin-off article is a good idea and I'd be glad to work on it when I can find the time. Regards,

1851: 1425: 947: 900: 853: 341:"This response (By Sbharris) on the Lee Harvey Owald talk page is frowned upon by Knowledge (XXG): 292: 3847: 3776: 3542: 3456: 3354: 3252: 2987: 2878: 2862: 1759: 396: 3429: 3315: 3194: 3173: 3143: 3109: 3067: 3051: 2950: 2834: 2789: 2771: 2756: 2727: 2715: 2679: 2648: 2637: 2571: 2517: 2481: 2469: 2421: 2395: 2377: 2366: 2342: 2311: 2281: 2264: 2242: 2228: 2197: 2179: 2088:

with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going

1988: 1882: 1831: 1717: 1703: 1702:

I've always been intrigued by 'dark-complected man.' What's with the radio, and fist in the air?

1562: 1444: 1429: 1409: 1376: 1324: 1282: 1211: 1188: 1159: 1143: 1126: 1109: 1091: 1059: 1016: 982: 816: 800: 788: 754: 704: 370: 101: 3870:

Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Knowledge (XXG), and have a happy and enjoyable

3480:

Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Knowledge (XXG), and have a happy and enjoyable

3276:

Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Knowledge (XXG), and have a happy and enjoyable

1871: 1254: 425: 1738:

Almost all of the witness heard three shots that day, the three Oswald was said to have fired.

3840: 3679: 3638: 3449: 3245: 2819: 2747: 2445: 2101: 2093: 1504:

Number of fake secret service agents on the knoll: At least one. (Plus two more near the SBD).

1342: 1306: 1266: 1250: 1105: 1071: 1048: 923: 714: 654: 575:. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, 3788: 3554: 3366: 3127: 2999: 2874: 2866: 2437:

Talk:Joni_Ernst#RfC: Can material that is critical to the subject be included in the article?

3811: 2618: 2591: 2540: 2499: 2142: 1645: 1547: 1508: 1397: 1365: 1258: 552: 360: 351: 347: 271: 224: 202: 173: 79: 3791:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3784: 3625: 3557:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3550: 3369:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3362: 3002:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2995: 2877:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2870: 2217: 2030:

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at

603:

Hello, when you want to link to the article about something British, please do not link to

517: 462: 454: 436: 435:

Knowledge (XXG) does not publish "unconfirmed rumors", as your edit is headed. Please read

244:

We need to work on the sections that don’t have a good balance, such as the section on the

3685: 2672:

Talk:John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories#Section regarding prominent critics

2510:

Talk:John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories#Section regarding prominent critics

2436: 2413: 2009: 1973: 1942: 1440: 616: 480: 228: 1741:

And all the reporters said that they heard three shots, Proof Oswald acted alone right?

296: 219:

to the Oswald and JFK articles (and any other wikiarticles!). You're an editor like me,

1680:

You gotta admit, whetever there was a conspiracy or not, their reactions were strange.

2127: 1904:'The Obama Chronicles,' Part 3: Barack Obama's Mentors; September 19, 2008; FoxNews.com 1847: 996: 967: 770: 693: 608: 525: 500: 484: 440: 404: 325: 301: 120: 88:, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type 3624:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be

1855: 1497:

Some of the witnesses on the knoll who were sure shots were coming from behind them...

78:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on

3710: 2946: 2785: 2752: 2711: 2675: 2663: 2633: 2513: 2465: 2417: 2391: 2362: 2304: 2257: 2221: 2172: 2058: 1987:

There is already a request for comment on the talk pages. Your thoughts are welcome.

1903: 1827: 1234: 1167: 1134: 1099: 784: 676:. I personally do not bother with them, but a number of biography editors like them. 620: 612: 170:"I’m going to stab my own brain with a curtain rod if I think about this much longer" 3714: 1677:

It not because I am beating you up on this, but I just think his facts are correct.

2921: 2905: 2440: 1863: 1064: 1041: 3755: 3524: 3336: 2969: 2416:. Please view all the links I provided and then respond appropriately. Thank you. 457:

and have now made a total of over 5 reverts in less than 12 hours on the article

109: 2614: 2587: 2536: 2495: 2135: 1815: 1620: 1604: 1463:

Our little debate was cut off... rightfully so... I just get so carried away...

1393: 1361: 458: 384: 1139: 635:

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

94:

on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

1969: 1751: 1672: 717:. However, I'd still rather fight than give up, even at my age. Thanks again. 466: 3215:

hi, can you suggest me some possible wordings for the latest issue? Thanks. —

2333:

So, it seems Brandon is a practically a reincarnation of our old friend RPJ!

1935:

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for

495:

Since Mediation is currently having a severe backlog, I took the case to the

3885: 3871: 3858: 3825: 3741: 3693: 3583: 3500: 3481: 3467: 3437: 3422: 3395: 3323: 3296: 3277: 3263: 3229: 3206: 3185: 3151: 3126:

Yes, he's a real treat to work with, isn't he? I suspect there's a {{paid}}

3117: 3102: 3075: 3059: 3028: 2954: 2898: 2842: 2827: 2793: 2779: 2760: 2735: 2719: 2683: 2656: 2641: 2622: 2595: 2579: 2544: 2521: 2503: 2489: 2473: 2450: 2425: 2399: 2385: 2370: 2350: 2318: 2289: 2271: 2250: 2235: 2205: 2186: 2148: 2109: 2062: 2017: 1996: 1981: 1890: 1835: 1793: 1725: 1711: 1695: 1659: 1597: 1570: 1555: 1516: 1452: 1433: 1417: 1401: 1384: 1369: 1350: 1332: 1314: 1290: 1274: 1238: 1219: 1196: 1151: 1117: 1075: 1052: 1024: 999: 990: 970: 955: 908: 861: 808: 773: 757: 726: 707: 696: 680: 657: 623: 590: 555: 528: 503: 487: 469: 443: 407: 373: 363: 354: 328: 304: 274: 252: 231: 205: 176: 157: 123: 1187:, they shouldn't turn around and create their own fantasy as that IP did!-- 403:

of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -

3047: 2746:

Hi, Joegoodfriend. I just wanted to let you know that the RFC I opened in

787:. I guess I'm a little biased like that. Thank you for your info. (from 783:

I was not aware that there was another kids show that ran longer than the

324:

on the Clay Shaw page regarding the Max Holland article. Please comment.

3706: 2054: 1965: 1230: 677: 521: 220: 201:

I´m glad that you´re working on the Kennedy pages, by the way. Have fun.

3795:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3678:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

3561:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3373:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3006:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2167:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is

2076: 1939:, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided. 1807: 227:

and everybody else. Don't let anyone scare you off from editing a page.

3773:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3407:

I was wondering. But now I am glad to see that edited in recent past :)

2865:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

2462:

Talk:John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories#NPOV Train Wreck

1772:

this time delete everything I said on here and tell me what you think.

604: 597: 3090:. I was wondering if you might be available to weigh in on the issue? 2627:

If I may, I agree with Joe that it is relatively common for people on

2008:. I would strongly suggest both of you work together on a new RFC. -- 1490:

Number of witnesses identifying smoke coming from the grassy knoll: 7.

417: 1257:, a suspicious character in the JFK assassination who was inside the 338:

I thought I should add this to the Oswald page, because it needs it.

1039:

Nice work on finding out more info on this film thought to be lost!

674:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history#Military person infobox

245: 1482:

mean, clearly, Brennan saw SOMEONE up there. What happened to him?

647:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests_for_arbitration/RPJ#Log_of_blocks_and_bans

3042:

Hello, I recently removed the death of Isadora Duncan, 1927; from

1478:

quiet they could hear the bullet shells hitting the floor above?"

1960:

Resolve content dispute on Alger Hiss talk before reverting again

579:. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, 3808:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1862:(who would be a mentor to the teen-aged and future US president 1015:

I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and a Happy 2009.--

322: 3798:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

3564:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

3376:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

3009:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

2435:

An RFC on an article you recently edited is being conducted at

2006: 1870:

Hi Red. Take a look at wikipedia's policies on reliable sources

1561:

a break right now, but I'll think about all this soon. Thanks.

1360:

Why do you consider the association with MacLean not relevant?

1142:. It does not have the kind of time stamp you are thinking of. 2390:

LOL! Thanks; don't know why I couldn't see that. Best wishes,

2256:

articles somewhere people will want to work instead of fight.

2092:, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. 1760:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u08P2R2l5T8&feature=related

1253:

article, I wanted to bring to your attention a new article on

300:

brainwashed, not because someone mentioned them specifically.

2039:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests#Requests for arbitration

1814:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

3846: 3839: 3600: 3455: 3448: 3251: 3244: 2125:, which named you as a party, has been declined. Please see 1806: 416: 3193:

I wanted to send you an email, but you havent enabled it. —

3088:

John F. Kennedy Assassination Conspiracy Theories talk page

2558:

Talk:Assassination_of_John_F._Kennedy#Infobox_violates_NPOV

1296:

Thanks, Joe. I am finding a lot of info I'd like to add to

2925:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

1624:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

823:

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Floppyandfriends.jpg

3724:==Alger Hiss==Thank you for defending my rep (years ago) 870:

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Charles Dean AP.jpg

3767:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

1467:

initially reported what they later say they saw - NONE.

524:. Feel free to add any comments you feel are necessary. 3779:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3666:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

3648:

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing

3545:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3357:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2990:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2919:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2707: 2328: 2163:

Hello. Please participate in the current discussion at

2121: 1618:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3631:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

1964:

Joegoodfriend Please resolve content differences with

1108:

page that I think will answer some of your questions.

146:

4. The rifle was carefully hidden, not simply dropped.

3086:

A rather heated debate has recently developed at the

2165:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

581:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/RPJ/Workshop

577:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/RPJ/Evidence

483:

on RPJ. Please feel free to add your own comments.

3409:

By the way, you should enable the email function. —

2080:An article that you have been involved in editing, 1265:. Your help saving it would be greatly appreciated. 942:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 895:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 848:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 764:

Debunked/Disproven v. Called Into Question/Disputed

571:An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: 2938:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Charles Dean 1637:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Sam Granato 917:Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ciravolo.jpg 198:watch the fireworks, but try and remain neutral. 3170:John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories 2857:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1249:Hi, based upon your helpful contributions to the 439:carefully, before you get yourself into trouble. 424:You have made an edit that could be regarded as 2412:Hi, I've posted a note to you on the Alger Hiss 741:Hi, thanks the message. A couple of suggestions. 639:RPJ is banned from Knowledge (XXG) for one year. 2119:This is a courtesy notice to inform you that a 2032:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests#Alger Hiss 1716:Hm. Bowers seems like a straight-up guy to me. 3732:) 02:41, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Jeffkisseloff 3512:}} to user talk pages with a friendly message. 3308:}} to user talk pages with a friendly message. 1439:Hello again Rhosfawr. I received your messge. 33:Here are a few links you might find helpful: 3162:Edit on JFK assassination conspiracy theories 2337:Perhaps the RPJ request for arbitration, and 2131:for potential suggestions on moving forward. 359:Apologies for this. Ramsquire sorted it out. 8: 3703:I'm Sorry I got mad at you over Alger Hiss. 933:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline 886:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline 839:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline 630:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/RPJ 573:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/RPJ 563:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/RPJ 265:Another comment (sorry): Try not to mention 1822:redirect, you might want to participate in 1227:CIA Kennedy assassination conspiracy theory 3750: 2706:My apologies for my response to your edit 1818:. Since you had some involvement with the 1752:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvqCtaBkyyE 1673:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NB-TLTWAh6s 2927:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 1626:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 1298:Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories 1205:Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories 2169:Long term incivility from User:BrandonTR 586:On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, 3637:notice, but please explain why in your 1896: 769:thoughts would be greatly appreciated. 391:from editing Knowledge (XXG) under the 2806:After somebody else added an entry to 1941:If you have any questions, please see 1665:Umbrella Man & Dark-Complected Man 1390:is still seen as a great CIA officer. 2361:Just curious--what does 072713 mean? 2115:Request for Arbitration case declined 516:This is a notice that I have filed a 461:I have blocked you for 24 hours. See 45:Don't let grumpy users scare you off. 7: 3764:2019 Arbitration Committee elections 3682:of each individual file for details. 3534:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 3531:Hello, Joegoodfriend. Voting in the 3346:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 3343:Hello, Joegoodfriend. Voting in the 2979:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 2976:Hello, Joegoodfriend. Voting in the 1826:(if you have not already done so). 1245:JFK Assassination / Dal-Tex Building 211:Hi, I just want to encourage you to 3781:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 3547:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 3359:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 2992:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 1210:myself, I'm kind of fond of it :)) 453:As you were warned above about the 65:Contribute, Contribute, Contribute! 3747:ArbCom 2019 election voter message 3626:deleted for any of several reasons 3616:because of the following concern: 3518:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 3508:Send Halloween cheer by adding {{ 3330:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 3304:Send Halloween cheer by adding {{ 1375:enough to include in the article? 14: 3651:{{proposed deletion/dated files}} 3634:{{proposed deletion/dated files}} 2936:The article will be discussed at 2883:review the candidates' statements 2812:List of rediscovered film footage 2134:For the Arbitration Committee, — 2045:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration guide 1734:Why people only heard three shots 1635:The article will be discussed at 172:, made me laugh a lot :) Thanks. 3754: 3523: 3335: 2968: 2912: 2158: 2075: 2005:Please my response to CJK here: 1922:The media file you uploaded as: 1611: 929:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 882:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 835:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 747:Yes, Make small scale revisions. 653:For the Arbitration Committee -- 619:by writing out ] or ]. Regards, 28:We can't say that loudly enough! 3802:and submit your choices on the 3620:unused, low-res, no obvious use 3568:and submit your choices on the 3380:and submit your choices on the 799:at the local grocery. Go Reds! 395:, which states that nobody may 3742:02:41, 11 September 2019 (UTC) 3715:22:20, 10 September 2019 (UTC) 3423:23:58, 27 September 2018 (UTC) 3168:I recently made some edits on 2889:. For the Election committee, 2859:Arbitration Committee election 2850:ArbCom elections are now open! 1459:Oswald, TSBD, Grassy Knoll etc 944:media copyright questions page 897:media copyright questions page 850:media copyright questions page 387:. If you continue, you may be 1: 3826:00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC) 3584:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 3029:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 2955:20:35, 12 November 2016 (UTC) 2899:13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 2710:. I have fixed my comment. - 2684:17:13, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 2657:21:07, 7 September 2014 (UTC) 2642:06:37, 7 September 2014 (UTC) 2623:16:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC) 2596:16:06, 5 September 2014 (UTC) 2580:17:37, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 2545:15:07, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 2522:04:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC) 2504:15:08, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 1660:23:47, 27 December 2011 (UTC) 1025:08:25, 18 December 2008 (UTC) 956:13:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC) 909:20:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC) 809:23:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 658:05:24, 20 December 2006 (UTC) 624:23:59, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 591:12:57, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 529:23:44, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 504:19:55, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 317:Request for Comment:Clay Shaw 3886:22:22, 30 October 2021 (UTC) 3501:12:26, 15 October 2018 (UTC) 3396:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 3324:23:09, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 3297:21:08, 28 October 2017 (UTC) 2192:I have added my thoughts to 2100:) 16:02, 5 July 2013 (UTC) 1794:20:27, 25 January 2012 (UTC) 1726:16:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 1712:04:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 1696:17:53, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 1598:09:28, 24 October 2011 (UTC) 1197:15:13, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 1168:07:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1152:00:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1135:09:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 1118:01:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 1100:08:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 940:criteria for speedy deletion 893:criteria for speedy deletion 846:criteria for speedy deletion 681:15:28, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 556:20:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 488:01:48, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 470:19:49, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 444:16:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 408:16:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 350:20:19, 4 August 2006 (UTC)" 3720:Talk comments re Alger Hiss 3670:allows discussion to reach 3438:18:32, 1 October 2018 (UTC) 3048:talk page of unusual deaths 3013:and submit your choices on 2885:and submit your choices on 2494:um agreed. yes, exactly. -- 2490:17:17, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 2474:17:28, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 2456:List of lone gunman critics 2451:03:27, 16 August 2014 (UTC) 1915:missing description details 1076:09:59, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 1053:10:07, 3 January 2009 (UTC) 862:05:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 779:Thank you for clarification 343:"Don´t bite the newcomers". 97:We're so glad you're here! 3903: 3877:—usernamekiran • sign the 3818:MediaWiki message delivery 3662:exist. In particular, the 3576:MediaWiki message delivery 3388:MediaWiki message delivery 3207:12:13, 25 March 2017 (UTC) 3186:12:09, 25 March 2017 (UTC) 3152:06:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC) 3076:18:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC) 3021:MediaWiki message delivery 3011:the candidates' statements 2891:MediaWiki message delivery 2808:List of rediscovered films 2736:15:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC) 2720:23:25, 22 April 2015 (UTC) 2357:Compromise proposal 072713 2084:, has been proposed for a 2082:Timeline of Sun Myung Moon 2070:Timeline of Sun Myung Moon 1955:09:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC) 1775:This is the last message. 1418:02:55, 2 August 2009 (UTC) 1402:01:21, 2 August 2009 (UTC) 1385:00:02, 2 August 2009 (UTC) 1370:23:42, 1 August 2009 (UTC) 830:Image:Floppyandfriends.jpg 727:01:20, 20 April 2016 (UTC) 374:21:42, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 364:21:55, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 355:20:31, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 329:17:19, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 305:20:37, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 275:19:36, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 110:20:37, 14 March 2006 (UTC) 3656:proposed deletion process 3230:23:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC) 3118:18:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC) 3103:21:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC) 3060:08:11, 4 March 2017 (UTC) 2843:16:14, 14 July 2015 (UTC) 2794:20:28, 23 July 2015 (UTC) 2426:18:55, 5 March 2014 (UTC) 2400:15:45, 28 July 2013 (UTC) 2386:15:01, 28 July 2013 (UTC) 2371:06:46, 28 July 2013 (UTC) 2351:00:42, 17 July 2013 (UTC) 2319:18:58, 16 July 2013 (UTC) 2290:21:55, 15 July 2013 (UTC) 2272:21:44, 15 July 2013 (UTC) 2251:21:39, 15 July 2013 (UTC) 2236:21:32, 15 July 2013 (UTC) 2206:02:31, 15 July 2013 (UTC) 2128:the Arbitrators' opinions 1891:20:26, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 1856:13:40, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 1571:19:52, 20 July 2011 (UTC) 1556:18:13, 20 July 2011 (UTC) 1517:15:57, 20 July 2011 (UTC) 1453:17:11, 10 June 2013 (UTC) 1434:11:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC) 1351:20:34, 22 July 2009 (UTC) 1333:22:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC) 1315:21:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC) 1291:19:48, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 1275:19:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 1239:05:19, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 1220:05:16, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 877:Image:Charles Dean AP.jpg 413:Your edits to Larry Craig 253:21:51, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 232:17:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 206:17:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 177:10:51, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 158:20:35, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 124:19:07, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 82:. Or, please come to the 3816:to your user talk page. 3694:01:01, 26 May 2019 (UTC) 3433: 3319: 3147: 3113: 3071: 2929:or whether it should be 2838: 2828:01:30, 9 July 2015 (UTC) 2780:02:48, 3 June 2015 (UTC) 2775: 2761:15:25, 2 June 2015 (UTC) 2731: 2652: 2575: 2485: 2381: 2346: 2285: 2246: 2201: 2194:the thread about Brandon 2187:19:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC) 2149:20:41, 7 July 2013 (UTC) 2110:16:02, 5 July 2013 (UTC) 2063:13:30, 4 July 2013 (UTC) 2018:14:43, 30 May 2013 (UTC) 1997:18:53, 29 May 2013 (UTC) 1992: 1982:16:40, 29 May 2013 (UTC) 1886: 1836:15:52, 24 May 2012 (UTC) 1802:Redirects for discussion 1721: 1707: 1628:or whether it should be 1566: 1448: 1413: 1380: 1328: 1286: 1147: 1113: 1058:And nice work on adding 1000:16:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 991:02:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC) 986: 971:23:10, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 804: 774:23:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 758:03:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 708:15:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC) 697:00:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC) 2674:and responded there. - 2122:request for arbitration 1840: 1824:the redirect discussion 1507:identified themselves. 518:request for arbitration 60:Play nicely with others 3851: 3844: 3622: 3605: 3460: 3453: 3256: 3249: 3044:list of unusual deaths 3037:list of unusual deaths 2810:, I decided to create 2742:New Orleans conspiracy 1926:File:Orion Clemens.jpg 1913:File:Orion Clemens.jpg 1811: 1800:J.D. Tippit listed at 1081: 961:Oswald and New Orleans 421: 321:I'm asking for an Rfc 3850: 3843: 3777:Arbitration Committee 3761:Hello! Voting in the 3698: 3618: 3614:proposed for deletion 3604: 3543:Arbitration Committee 3510:subst:Happy Halloween 3459: 3452: 3355:Arbitration Committee 3306:subst:Happy Halloween 3255: 3248: 2988:Arbitration Committee 2961:ArbCom Elections 2016 2863:Arbitration Committee 2339:subsequent "workshop" 2068:Merge discussion for 1810: 921:Thanks for uploading 874:Thanks for uploading 827:Thanks for uploading 420: 3868:Hello Joegoodfriend: 3668:files for discussion 3643:the file's talk page 3478:Hello Joegoodfriend: 3403:glad to see you back 3274:Hello Joegoodfriend: 2668:Reductio ad Hitlerum 1860:Frank Marshall Davis 1140:Here is the transfer 1034:Dance on the Volcano 50:Meet other new users 2867:arbitration process 2480:Bugliosi." Thanks. 130:'Reasonable Doubt'. 85:Newcomers help page 3852: 3845: 3793:arbitration policy 3660:deletion processes 3610:File:Johnlclem.jpg 3606: 3596:File:Johnlclem.jpg 3559:arbitration policy 3461: 3454: 3371:arbitration policy 3257: 3250: 3004:arbitration policy 2963:: Voting now open! 2879:arbitration policy 2833:Right on. Thanks. 1812: 1579:Buster Keaton list 1060:The Spiders (film) 924:Image:Ciravolo.jpg 479:I've initiated an 422: 16: 3832: 3831: 3592:Proposed deletion 3513: 3309: 2748:Lee Harvey Oswald 2317: 2270: 2234: 2185: 1947:Theo's Little Bot 1784:comment added by 1686:comment added by 1251:JFK Assassination 1106:Lee Harvey Oswald 715:Semmelweis reflex 539:I added something 455:three revert rule 393:three-revert rule 246:killing of Tippit 70:Tell us about you 55:Learn from others 3894: 3862: 3815: 3758: 3751: 3683: 3653: 3652: 3636: 3635: 3603: 3527: 3507: 3499: 3498: 3496: 3471: 3444:Halloween cheer! 3421: 3420: 3418: 3339: 3303: 3295: 3294: 3292: 3267: 3240:Halloween cheer! 3228: 3226: 3225: 3219: 3203: 3197: 3182: 3176: 2972: 2916: 2915: 2508:Joe, please see 2448: 2443: 2314: 2309: 2307: 2267: 2262: 2260: 2231: 2226: 2224: 2182: 2177: 2175: 2171:. Thank you. — 2162: 2161: 2154:ANI notification 2146: 2140: 2130: 2124: 2079: 1906: 1901: 1796: 1698: 1658: 1615: 1614: 1259:Dal-Tex Building 1067: 1044: 797:The Magic Window 672:wish to look at 115:Dr. Cyril Wecht. 92: 3902: 3901: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3865: 3856: 3837: 3809: 3749: 3722: 3701: 3677: 3664:speedy deletion 3650: 3649: 3633: 3632: 3601: 3599: 3588: 3587: 3528: 3520: 3515: 3514: 3492: 3489: 3488: 3474: 3465: 3446: 3414: 3411: 3410: 3405: 3400: 3399: 3340: 3332: 3311: 3310: 3288: 3285: 3284: 3270: 3261: 3242: 3222: 3221: 3217: 3216: 3201: 3195: 3180: 3174: 3164: 3133:Earl of Arundel 3095:Earl of Arundel 3084: 3040: 3033: 3032: 3016:the voting page 2973: 2965: 2917: 2913: 2910: 2887:the voting page 2853: 2804: 2744: 2704: 2532: 2458: 2446: 2441: 2433: 2410: 2376:July 27, 2013. 2359: 2312: 2305: 2265: 2258: 2229: 2222: 2214: 2180: 2173: 2159: 2156: 2143: 2136: 2126: 2120: 2117: 2073: 2028: 1962: 1957: 1943:Help:Image page 1917: 1909: 1902: 1898: 1843: 1841:Obama's mentors 1805: 1779: 1736: 1681: 1667: 1648: 1616: 1612: 1609: 1581: 1461: 1358: 1247: 1207: 1178: 1084: 1082:Oswald's flight 1065: 1042: 1037: 1010: 1008:Merry Christmas 963: 919: 872: 825: 781: 766: 734: 719:99th Percentile 689: 665: 633: 617:British English 601: 566: 541: 497:Mediation Cabal 477: 451: 430:blocking policy 415: 381: 336: 319: 182:Another point: 166: 117: 90: 25: 19: 12: 11: 5: 3900: 3898: 3889: 3888: 3876: 3869: 3866: 3853: 3838: 3836: 3833: 3830: 3829: 3800:the candidates 3770:eligible users 3759: 3748: 3745: 3721: 3718: 3700: 3697: 3674:for deletion. 3654:will stop the 3598: 3589: 3566:the candidates 3529: 3522: 3521: 3519: 3516: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3486: 3479: 3475: 3462: 3447: 3445: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3408: 3404: 3401: 3378:the candidates 3341: 3334: 3333: 3331: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3282: 3275: 3271: 3258: 3243: 3241: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3210: 3209: 3167: 3163: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3121: 3120: 3083: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3052:—usernamekiran 3039: 3034: 2974: 2967: 2966: 2964: 2958: 2911: 2909: 2904:Nomination of 2902: 2856: 2852: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2803: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2768: 2743: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2703: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2567: 2563: 2555: 2552: 2531: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2506: 2457: 2454: 2432: 2429: 2409: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2358: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2335:Remember this? 2331: 2325: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2277:In this thread 2213: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2155: 2152: 2116: 2113: 2072: 2066: 2049: 2048: 2042: 2027: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2000: 1999: 1961: 1958: 1929: 1928: 1920:Dear uploader: 1918: 1916: 1910: 1908: 1907: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1878: 1874: 1842: 1839: 1804: 1798: 1735: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1666: 1663: 1610: 1608: 1603:Nomination of 1601: 1580: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1542: 1541: 1531: 1530: 1525: 1524: 1460: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1421: 1420: 1357: 1354: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1294: 1293: 1246: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1206: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1177: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1083: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1036: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1009: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 978: 962: 959: 948:BetacommandBot 918: 915: 913: 901:BetacommandBot 871: 868: 866: 854:BetacommandBot 824: 821: 812: 811: 780: 777: 765: 762: 761: 760: 751: 748: 745: 742: 733: 730: 711: 710: 688: 685: 684: 683: 664: 661: 651: 650: 643: 640: 632: 627: 609:United Kingdom 600: 594: 565: 560: 559: 558: 547: 546: 540: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 509: 508: 507: 506: 476: 473: 450: 447: 414: 411: 380: 377: 335: 332: 318: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 309: 308: 307: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 277: 258: 257: 256: 255: 242: 235: 234: 181: 165: 162: 161: 160: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 135: 131: 116: 113: 73: 72: 67: 62: 57: 52: 47: 42: 21: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3899: 3887: 3884: 3880: 3875: 3873: 3864: 3863: 3860: 3849: 3842: 3834: 3828: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3813: 3807: 3806: 3801: 3796: 3794: 3790: 3786: 3782: 3778: 3772: 3771: 3766: 3765: 3760: 3757: 3753: 3752: 3746: 3744: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3719: 3717: 3716: 3712: 3708: 3704: 3696: 3695: 3691: 3687: 3681: 3675: 3673: 3669: 3665: 3661: 3657: 3646: 3644: 3640: 3629: 3627: 3621: 3617: 3615: 3611: 3597: 3593: 3590: 3586: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3572: 3567: 3562: 3560: 3556: 3552: 3548: 3544: 3539: 3536: 3535: 3526: 3517: 3511: 3503: 3502: 3497: 3495: 3490:usernamekiran 3485: 3483: 3473: 3472: 3469: 3458: 3451: 3443: 3439: 3435: 3431: 3430:Joegoodfriend 3427: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3419: 3417: 3412:usernamekiran 3402: 3398: 3397: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3384: 3379: 3374: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3360: 3356: 3351: 3348: 3347: 3338: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3317: 3316:Joegoodfriend 3313: 3312: 3307: 3299: 3298: 3293: 3291: 3286:usernamekiran 3281: 3279: 3269: 3268: 3265: 3254: 3247: 3239: 3231: 3227: 3224: 3218:usernamekiran 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3208: 3204: 3198: 3196:usernamekiran 3192: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3183: 3177: 3175:usernamekiran 3171: 3161: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3144:Joegoodfriend 3141: 3140: 3138: 3134: 3129: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3119: 3115: 3111: 3110:Joegoodfriend 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3091: 3089: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3068:Joegoodfriend 3064: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3038: 3035: 3031: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3017: 3012: 3007: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2984: 2981: 2980: 2971: 2962: 2959: 2957: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2942: 2939: 2934: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2923: 2907: 2903: 2901: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2851: 2848: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2835:Joegoodfriend 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2818:is on there. 2817: 2813: 2809: 2802:New film list 2801: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2772:Joegoodfriend 2769: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2749: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2728:Joegoodfriend 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2701: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2649:Joegoodfriend 2645: 2644: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2630: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2572:Joegoodfriend 2568: 2564: 2562: 2559: 2556: 2553: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2529: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2482:Joegoodfriend 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2455: 2453: 2452: 2449: 2444: 2438: 2430: 2428: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2407: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2378:Joegoodfriend 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2343:Joegoodfriend 2340: 2336: 2332: 2329: 2326: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2315: 2308: 2302: 2299:I've started 2291: 2287: 2283: 2282:Joegoodfriend 2278: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2268: 2261: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2243:Joegoodfriend 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2232: 2225: 2219: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2198:Joegoodfriend 2195: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2183: 2176: 2170: 2166: 2153: 2151: 2150: 2147: 2145: 2141: 2139: 2132: 2129: 2123: 2114: 2112: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2078: 2071: 2067: 2065: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2046: 2043: 2040: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2033: 2025: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1989:Joegoodfriend 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1959: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1945:. Thank you. 1944: 1940: 1938: 1933: 1927: 1924: 1923: 1921: 1914: 1911: 1905: 1900: 1897: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1883:Joegoodfriend 1879: 1875: 1872: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1838: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1809: 1803: 1799: 1797: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1776: 1773: 1770: 1769: 1765: 1762: 1761: 1757: 1754: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1742: 1739: 1733: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1718:Joegoodfriend 1715: 1714: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1704:Joegoodfriend 1701: 1700: 1699: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1678: 1675: 1674: 1670: 1664: 1662: 1661: 1656: 1652: 1647: 1641: 1638: 1633: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1622: 1606: 1602: 1600: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1585: 1578: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1563:Joegoodfriend 1559: 1558: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1544: 1543: 1538: 1533: 1532: 1527: 1526: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1505: 1501: 1498: 1494: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1468: 1464: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1445:Joegoodfriend 1442: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1410:Joegoodfriend 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1377:Joegoodfriend 1372: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1355: 1353: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1325:Joegoodfriend 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1299: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1283:Joegoodfriend 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1212:Joegoodfriend 1204: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1144:Joegoodfriend 1141: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1110:Joegoodfriend 1107: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1068: 1061: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1045: 1035: 1032: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1007: 1001: 998: 994: 993: 992: 988: 984: 983:Joegoodfriend 979: 975: 974: 973: 972: 969: 960: 958: 957: 953: 949: 945: 941: 936: 934: 930: 926: 925: 916: 914: 911: 910: 906: 902: 898: 894: 889: 887: 883: 879: 878: 869: 867: 864: 863: 859: 855: 851: 847: 842: 840: 836: 832: 831: 822: 820: 818: 817:Professor2789 810: 806: 802: 801:Joegoodfriend 798: 794: 793: 792: 790: 789:Professor2789 786: 785:Uncle Al Show 778: 776: 775: 772: 763: 759: 756: 755:Joegoodfriend 752: 749: 746: 743: 740: 739: 738: 731: 729: 728: 724: 720: 716: 709: 706: 705:Joegoodfriend 701: 700: 699: 698: 695: 686: 682: 679: 678:Hal Jespersen 675: 670: 669: 668: 662: 660: 659: 656: 648: 644: 641: 638: 637: 636: 631: 628: 626: 625: 622: 618: 614: 613:Great Britain 610: 606: 599: 595: 593: 592: 589: 584: 582: 578: 574: 569: 564: 561: 557: 554: 549: 548: 543: 542: 538: 530: 527: 523: 519: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 505: 502: 498: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 486: 482: 474: 472: 471: 468: 464: 460: 456: 448: 446: 445: 442: 438: 433: 431: 427: 419: 412: 410: 409: 406: 402: 398: 394: 390: 386: 378: 376: 375: 372: 371:Joegoodfriend 366: 365: 362: 357: 356: 353: 349: 344: 339: 333: 331: 330: 327: 323: 316: 306: 303: 298: 294: 293:Joegoodfriend 290: 289: 288: 287: 286: 285: 284: 283: 276: 273: 268: 264: 263: 262: 261: 260: 259: 254: 251: 250:JoeGoodfriend 247: 243: 239: 238: 237: 236: 233: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 209: 208: 207: 204: 199: 195: 191: 188: 187: 183: 179: 178: 175: 171: 163: 159: 156: 155:JoeGoodfriend 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 132: 128: 127: 126: 125: 122: 114: 112: 111: 107: 103: 102:Adrian~enwiki 98: 95: 93: 87: 86: 81: 76: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 56: 53: 51: 48: 46: 43: 41: 40: 36: 35: 34: 31: 29: 24: 3867: 3855: 3854: 3803: 3797: 3774: 3768: 3762: 3734:24.164.186.4 3726:24.164.186.4 3723: 3705: 3702: 3680:page history 3676: 3658:, but other 3647: 3639:edit summary 3630: 3623: 3619: 3607: 3569: 3563: 3540: 3532: 3530: 3493: 3477: 3476: 3464: 3463: 3415: 3406: 3381: 3375: 3352: 3344: 3342: 3289: 3273: 3272: 3260: 3259: 3223: 3165: 3092: 3085: 3041: 3014: 3008: 2985: 2977: 2975: 2943: 2935: 2922:Charles Dean 2920: 2918: 2908:for deletion 2906:Charles Dean 2854: 2820:Clarityfiend 2815: 2805: 2745: 2705: 2664:Godwin's law 2628: 2560: 2533: 2512:. Cheers! - 2460:Hi, Joe. In 2459: 2434: 2411: 2360: 2298: 2215: 2157: 2144: 2137: 2133: 2118: 2102:Steve Dufour 2094:Steve Dufour 2074: 2053: 2050: 2029: 1963: 1934: 1930: 1919: 1899: 1864:Barack Obama 1844: 1819: 1813: 1786:92.16.23.173 1780:— Preceding 1777: 1774: 1771: 1766: 1764:and finally 1763: 1758: 1755: 1750: 1746: 1743: 1740: 1737: 1688:92.16.23.173 1682:— Preceding 1679: 1676: 1671: 1668: 1642: 1634: 1619: 1617: 1607:for deletion 1590:75.21.113.40 1586: 1582: 1535: 1503: 1502: 1496: 1495: 1489: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1471: 1469: 1465: 1462: 1422: 1392: 1388: 1373: 1359: 1343:DrippingGoss 1339: 1307:DrippingGoss 1295: 1267:DrippingGoss 1248: 1225:I put it in 1215: 1208: 1184: 1063: 1040: 1038: 964: 946:. Thank you. 937: 922: 920: 912: 899:. Thank you. 890: 875: 873: 865: 852:. Thank you. 843: 828: 826: 813: 796: 782: 767: 735: 732:Reed Article 712: 690: 666: 652: 634: 602: 585: 570: 567: 478: 452: 434: 423: 400: 382: 367: 358: 342: 340: 337: 320: 266: 200: 196: 192: 189: 185: 184: 180: 169: 167: 118: 99: 96: 89: 83: 80:my talk page 77: 74: 38: 32: 27: 22: 20: 3805:voting page 3571:voting page 3383:voting page 3314:Thanks! :) 1820:J.D. Tippit 1816:J.D. Tippit 1744:Maybe NOT! 1646:FisherQueen 1621:Sam Granato 1605:Sam Granato 1548:Canada Jack 1540:windshield! 1509:Canada Jack 588:Thatcher131 553:andreasegde 520:concerning 459:Larry Craig 385:Larry Craig 361:andreasegde 352:andreasegde 348:andreasegde 272:andreasegde 225:andreasegde 203:andreasegde 174:andreasegde 3789:topic bans 3686:FastilyBot 3555:topic bans 3367:topic bans 3000:topic bans 2875:topic bans 2816:Metropolis 2408:Alger Hiss 2026:Alger Hiss 2010:Mike Cline 1974:Mike Cline 1970:Alger Hiss 1356:Alger Hiss 1303:Jim Braden 1255:Jim Braden 426:defamatory 229:Mytwocents 217:contribute 91:{{helpme}} 3879:guestbook 3872:Halloween 3859:Halloween 3785:site bans 3699:I'm Sorry 3672:consensus 3612:has been 3608:The file 3551:site bans 3482:Halloween 3468:Halloween 3363:site bans 3278:Halloween 3264:Halloween 2996:site bans 2871:site bans 2702:Apologies 2414:talk page 2212:BrandonTR 1848:Redhanker 1441:This link 1185:fantacist 1176:Thank you 997:Ramsquire 968:Ramsquire 771:Ramsquire 694:Ramsquire 663:John Clem 526:Ramsquire 501:Ramsquire 485:Ramsquire 441:Crockspot 405:Patstuart 334:Newcomers 326:Ramsquire 302:Ramsquire 153:time. :) 121:Ramsquire 3684:Thanks, 3128:template 3093:Thanks! 3050:Thanks. 2947:Muboshgu 2786:Location 2753:Location 2712:Location 2676:Location 2634:Location 2551:changes. 2514:Location 2466:Location 2418:Yopienso 2392:Yopienso 2363:Yopienso 2306:Gamaliel 2259:Gamaliel 2223:Gamaliel 2174:Gamaliel 2051:Thanks, 1937:deletion 1828:Location 1782:unsigned 1684:unsigned 1655:contribs 1588:Thanks!! 1426:Rhosfawr 1263:deletion 621:Jeff3000 596:link to 267:specific 39:Be Bold! 23:Welcome! 3812:NoACEMM 2931:deleted 2442:Cwobeel 2301:a draft 1968:on the 1630:deleted 1066:Lugnuts 1043:Lugnuts 655:Srikeit 605:British 598:British 568:Hello, 449:Blocked 389:blocked 213:Be Bold 3883:(talk) 3857:Happy 3641:or on 3494:(talk) 3466:Happy 3416:(talk) 3290:(talk) 3262:Happy 2861:. The 2615:Sm8900 2588:Sm8900 2537:Sm8900 2496:Sm8900 2447:(talk) 2218:WP:RFC 1951:error? 1858:"poet 1537:fired. 1394:IAC-62 1362:IAC-62 1189:jeanne 1160:jeanne 1127:jeanne 1125:lie.-- 1092:jeanne 1017:jeanne 687:Oswald 463:WP:BLP 437:WP:BLP 401:effect 397:revert 164:To you 2086:merge 1866:), " 1062:too. 467:MONGO 297:WP:RS 17:'ello 3835:Boo! 3822:talk 3775:The 3738:talk 3730:talk 3711:talk 3690:talk 3580:talk 3541:The 3487:– — 3434:talk 3392:talk 3353:The 3320:talk 3283:– — 3202:talk 3181:talk 3166:Hi, 3148:talk 3137:talk 3114:talk 3099:talk 3072:talk 3056:talk 3025:talk 2986:The 2951:talk 2895:talk 2839:talk 2824:talk 2790:talk 2776:talk 2757:talk 2732:talk 2716:talk 2708:here 2680:talk 2666:vs. 2653:talk 2638:talk 2629:both 2619:talk 2592:talk 2576:talk 2541:talk 2530:note 2518:talk 2500:talk 2486:talk 2470:talk 2422:talk 2396:talk 2382:talk 2367:talk 2347:talk 2313:talk 2286:talk 2266:talk 2247:talk 2230:talk 2202:talk 2181:talk 2106:talk 2098:talk 2090:here 2059:talk 2014:talk 1993:talk 1978:talk 1887:talk 1852:talk 1832:talk 1790:talk 1722:talk 1708:talk 1692:talk 1651:talk 1594:talk 1567:talk 1552:talk 1513:talk 1449:talk 1430:talk 1414:talk 1398:talk 1381:talk 1366:talk 1347:talk 1329:talk 1311:talk 1287:talk 1271:talk 1235:talk 1216:talk 1193:talk 1164:talk 1148:talk 1131:talk 1114:talk 1096:talk 1072:talk 1049:talk 1021:talk 987:talk 977:war. 952:talk 905:talk 858:talk 805:talk 723:talk 291:Hey 215:and 106:talk 3707:CJK 3594:of 2855:Hi, 2767:(?) 2439:- 2431:RFC 2138:ΛΧΣ 2055:CJK 1966:CJK 1231:ADM 615:or 522:RPJ 481:RfC 475:RfC 379:3RR 221:RPJ 3881:• 3824:) 3814:}} 3810:{{ 3787:, 3740:) 3713:) 3692:) 3645:. 3628:. 3582:) 3574:. 3553:, 3436:) 3394:) 3386:. 3365:, 3322:) 3205:) 3184:) 3150:) 3139:) 3116:) 3101:) 3074:) 3058:) 3027:) 3019:. 2998:, 2953:) 2945:– 2933:. 2897:) 2873:, 2841:) 2826:) 2814:. 2792:) 2778:) 2759:) 2734:) 2718:) 2682:) 2655:) 2640:) 2621:) 2594:) 2578:) 2543:) 2535:-- 2520:) 2502:) 2488:) 2472:) 2424:) 2398:) 2384:) 2369:) 2349:) 2288:) 2249:) 2204:) 2108:) 2061:) 2016:) 1995:) 1980:) 1953:) 1889:) 1854:) 1834:) 1792:) 1724:) 1710:) 1694:) 1653:· 1632:. 1596:) 1569:) 1554:) 1515:) 1451:) 1432:) 1416:) 1400:) 1383:) 1368:) 1349:) 1331:) 1313:) 1289:) 1273:) 1237:) 1218:) 1195:) 1166:) 1150:) 1133:) 1116:) 1098:) 1074:) 1051:) 1023:) 989:) 954:) 907:) 860:) 819:) 807:) 791:) 725:) 611:, 583:. 551:-- 432:. 223:, 108:) 100:— 30:) 3874:! 3861:! 3820:( 3736:( 3728:( 3709:( 3688:( 3578:( 3484:! 3470:! 3432:( 3390:( 3318:( 3280:! 3266:! 3199:( 3178:( 3146:( 3135:( 3112:( 3097:( 3070:( 3054:( 3023:( 2949:( 2893:( 2837:( 2822:( 2788:( 2774:( 2755:( 2730:( 2714:( 2678:( 2651:( 2636:( 2617:( 2590:( 2574:( 2539:( 2516:( 2498:( 2484:( 2468:( 2420:( 2394:( 2380:( 2365:( 2345:( 2316:) 2310:( 2284:( 2269:) 2263:( 2245:( 2233:) 2227:( 2200:( 2184:) 2178:( 2104:( 2096:( 2057:( 2047:. 2041:; 2012:( 1991:( 1976:( 1949:( 1885:( 1873:. 1850:( 1830:( 1788:( 1720:( 1706:( 1690:( 1657:) 1649:( 1592:( 1565:( 1550:( 1511:( 1447:( 1428:( 1412:( 1396:( 1379:( 1364:( 1345:( 1327:( 1309:( 1285:( 1269:( 1233:( 1214:( 1191:( 1162:( 1146:( 1129:( 1112:( 1094:( 1070:( 1047:( 1019:( 985:( 950:( 903:( 856:( 803:( 721:( 649:. 499:. 104:( 26:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index